FIDE Ethics imposes a six-month ban on Karjakin

by ChessBase
3/21/2022 – In reaction to public statements made by Sergey Karjakin about the war in Ukraine, the FIDE and Ethics and Disciplinary Commission banned Karjakin for six months "from participating as a player in any FIDE rated chess competition, taking effect from the date of this decision, 21 March 2022." Therefore, Karjakin will not be able to play in the Candidates Tournament that is scheduled to take place from 16 June to 7 July in Madrid, Spain. Grandmaster Sergei Shipov, who regularly works as a commentator, was not banned by FIDE for his statements about the war because "in comparison with Sergey Karjakin, Sergei Shipov is considerably less known and has, therefore, a less powerful platform." | Picture: Sergey Karjakin, Sergei Shipov | Picture: FIDE

Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally.
FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before. 

FIDE Press release, 21 March 2022

The FIDE Ethics and Disciplinary Commission (EDC) has reached a verdict on the case 2/2022, relating to public statements by grandmasters Sergey Karjakin (FIDE ID 14109603) and Sergei Shipov (FIDE ID 4113624).

The EDC First Instance Chamber, formed by Yolander Persaud (Guyana), Ravindra Dongre (India), and Johan Sigeman (Sweden) as Chairperson, unanimously decided as follows:

Sergey Karjakin is found guilty of breach of article 2.2.10 of the FIDE Code of Ethics, and is sanctioned to a worldwide ban of six months from participating as a player in any FIDE rated chess competition, taking effect from the date of this decision, 21 March 2022.

Sergei Shipov is found not guilty of breach of article 2.2.10 of the FIDE Code of Ethics. 

The article 2.2.10 of the Code of Ethics reads as follows:

“(…) Disciplinary action in accordance with this Code of Ethics will be taken in cases of occurrences which cause the game of chess, FIDE or its federations to appear in an unjustifiable unfavorable light and in this way damage its reputation.”

“The statements by Sergey Karjakin on the ongoing military conflict in Ukraine has led to a considerable number of reactions on social media and elsewhere, to a large extent negative towards the opinions expressed by Sergey Karjakin”, reads point 7.37 of the 10-page document where the EDC explains the reasons and legal background for its decision.

It continues: “A necessary condition for the establishment of guilt is that the statements have reached the public domain. This concept, with respect to disrepute clauses in sport, is not the world at large but the sport in which the accused engages, such as chess. Information concerning the accused's conduct which is not published in the media, but which can be learnt without a great deal of labour by persons engaged in the chess world or a relevant part of it, will be in the public domain and satisfy the public exposure element. The EDC Chamber is comfortably satisfied that this condition is fulfilled in this case.”

“The EDC Chamber finds, against the background given above, on the standard of comfortable satisfaction that the statements of Sergey Karjakin, which, by his own choice and presentation, can be connected to the game of chess, damage the reputation of the game of chess and/or FIDE. The likelihood that these statements will damage the reputation of Sergey Karjakin personally is also considerable”
, it concludes.

The Chamber explains its decision to not sanction Sergei Shipov with the following argument: “In comparison with Sergey Karjakin, Sergei Shipov is considerably less known and has, therefore, a less powerful platform. The statements made by Sergei Shipov are also of a slightly different and less provocative character than the ones made by Karjakin. In an overall evaluation of the potential negative impact on the game of chess and/or FIDE, the EDC Chamber is not sufficiently convinced that Sergei Shipov’s statements qualify as a breach of article 2.2.10.”

Sergey Karjakin has been advised by EDC that this decision may be appealed to the Appeal Chamber of the EDC by giving written notice of such appeal to the FIDE Secretariat within 21 days from the date upon which this decision is received. The notice of appeal must clearly state all the grounds for the appeal. Failing the due exercise of this right of appeal, the EDC Chamber's decision will become final.

Link

FIDE


Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.

James Satrapa James Satrapa 3/22/2022 09:14
These three responses all fail as generalisations. Karjakin is not responsible for hate speech (Monxxta), genocide (Martas), or advocating rape (arzi). Get real.

What did he actually say that was so wrong or so offensive and outside the bounds of free speech? Exact and attributable quotes please, otherwise the reply is worthless. Also please use your real names, as a signature block perhaps.

Put your credibility where your mouth is.
arzi arzi 3/22/2022 09:02
James Satrapa:"Disapprove of Karjakin's words all you like, but defend his right to say it."

Yes, if those words are just opinions. However, you can´t encourage the commission of a crime. "Let´s kill and rape all the British women and children." There is a line you can't cross.
Martas Martas 3/22/2022 08:59
James Satrapa - consider placing Voltaire to Mariupol and imagine him saying this to Karjakin, it suddenly has slightly different meaning, isn't it?
Supporting a genocide is considered a crime in civilized countries, maybe Karjakin is not fully aware of what he is doing by his statements which might be a reason why he still has GM title.
Monxxta Monxxta 3/22/2022 08:54
@James Satrapa
Applying Voltaire here is plain wrong, and it is surely not what he had in mind. It is contradicted by the tolerance paradox. As Popper described it: in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance.
The populists and extremists, mostly from the right side, that again plague todays societies, always start howling when their lies and hate is exposed and rejected, complaining about being oppressed and their right to free speech and free opinion being violated. And here comes the clue: hate is not an opinion. And that directly points to Karjakin.
arzi arzi 3/22/2022 07:20
JanneKejo and Neo-nazi. What is new, I mean neo? JanneKejo, a man who happily listens to the good news of a North Korean leader. Good news from a great humanitarian, Kim Jong-un.
James Satrapa James Satrapa 3/22/2022 07:15
"I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It" - possibly Voltaire

This defines the test of the framework of free speech.

Disapprove of Karjakin's words all you like, but defend his right to say it.
JanneKejo JanneKejo 3/22/2022 07:13
Having read Sergei Karjakin's tweets for the last few weeks, it seems to me that he is first of all condemning inhuman attacks against innocent people. The problem for many seems to be that the attacks he is mostly talking about are those commited by the Ukrainian neo-nazi batallions during the last 8 years, since the Maidan coup in 2014.

It is a fact that innocent people -- approximately 14 000 -- have been slaughtered in Ukraine during the last 8 years by those neo-nazi batallions. The killing in Ukraine didn't start last month. The goal of the Russian operation in Ukraine is partly to de-nazify the country and stop those killings and partly to stop the NATO-expansion eastwards to the Russian border.
arzi arzi 3/22/2022 06:53
Perhaps we should understand the difference between opinion and supporting a criminal attack? For example ... if you talk about the rape and give an opinion of that act:"rape is not a crime or rape is a crime." This is an opinion. However, if you talk about the rape and incite it: "Ukrainian women are great, let´s rape them, they are scum." This is not an opinion but a criminal incitement against certain group of people.

No, I don´t mean that Karjakin has said those things, I mentioned of.
Quanber Quanber 3/22/2022 06:32
Please wake up Karyakin if you ever have to play top level chess again. At the very least, it requires that your top level opponents do not cancel tournaments you participate in. Which is the situation right now. Many vill never give you that respect to play them. You will have to wake up first. Here is a wake up call :

The former Holocaust survivor Borys Romantshenko, was killed yesterday in Kharkiv. He was 96 years old. He survived concentration camps in Buchenwald, Dora-Mittelbau, Peenemünde and Bergen-Belsen, the death conveyor belts created by the Nazis. But he did not manage to survive a Russian grenade that hit his apartment in Kharkiv.
Every day of this war, it becomes more and more clear what Nazi - Putin means by his so-called 'de-Nazification' of Ukraine. Namely, a total slaughterhouse, where anyone who does not do as the monstrous Nazi - Putin wants it to be killed. Putin is the very definition of a war criminal.

You could also listen to the comments of guesting here.
WildKid WildKid 3/22/2022 06:06
I hope it goes without saying that I don't support Karyakin's delusional comments in any way whatsoever. I can only suppose that he's somehow entrapped in Russia's disinformation universe. But I still don't think it's fair to ban him from a tournament (such as the Candidates') that he's worked hard to properly qualify for, in accordance with rules laid down in advance by FIDE.

If organizers of invitational tournaments choose not to invite him, on the other hand, that's their right.
Leavenfish Leavenfish 3/22/2022 04:57
@guesting. Most everyone agrees with you, fortunately. This board attracts all sorts though...

I wonder who would be the next highest rate person on the rating list with the required # of games come May 1? Aronian? So? Ding doesn't have anywhere near enough rated games. If no one has enough games given the pandemic...maybe they can make a reasonable choice, cite the pandemic and simply allow Ding...or maybe just allow whomever finishes 3rd his current qualifier to go thru to the candidates? That may just be the best and least controversial option.
guesting guesting 3/22/2022 04:02
A chess player deffending the holocaust in Germany should be banned?! A racist chess player should be banned?! A chess player presentig homophobic behaviour should be banned?! The matter is not the opinion itself, but the message send to the wolrd from a public person influencing the new generations and awakening worst feelings of the older generations. I repeat: supporting genocide is not an opinion, is humanless behaviour.
I simple can not believe that anyone human on this Earth with a little dot of sense can find it normal bombing a school or a hospital full of pregs and children. Sorry, THIS IS NOT NORMAL.
Leavenfish Leavenfish 3/22/2022 03:44
@ Jacob woge - It's really neither here nor there, but a lady named Hall said that, not Voltaire. She was simply trying to wrap his ideas into a phrase.

In any case, how ironic that some would defend Karjakin's 'right' to say certain terrible things when he lives in a country and celebrates a man named Putin for whom the the right to say things extends only as far as he himself will allow.

@fgkdjlkag - Yes, arguably so. I have a feeling if the mentally ill Fischer had tried to play in FIDE tourneys after spewing his hatred of Jews, he too would have been "penalized"...and rightly so. I am certainly no fan of 'cancel culture', but "Free Speech" has it's limits and an organization has a right to distance itself from it.
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 3/22/2022 03:31
@JanneKejo,
You write,
“What a pity that the western mainstream media has not told the western people what is and has been really going on in Ukraine and why…”.
So how about learning it from the Russian media instead:
https://meduza.io/en
Aighearach Aighearach 3/22/2022 03:26
Having the right to say whatever horrible disgusting thing pops into your mind does not actually imply that civil society will, or should, treat you the same way regardless of what you say.

It is merely about not being punished by the government.

Nobody is stopping him from saying whatever he wants. Nobody is even trying to. However, decent people won't want to be associated with him, certainly won't want to shake his hand, and professionals probably don't want to appear in group photographs of him. Especially, for example, award photographs.

Those of you defending him have merely failed to de-nazify your own mind before attempting to embark on a special propaganda campaign, though it turns out you have no power over the events. No matter how you stamp your feet and pretend to be making a principled argument.
tom_70 tom_70 3/22/2022 01:57
The beautiful thing about chess is that it doesn't care about your politics or prejudices. When you play, all that matters is chess and all the useless noise, like these political pieces, have nothing to do with what really matters in our beloved game. Not even from an informative or historical standpoint, they're just pure political propaganda.
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 3/21/2022 10:30
I agree with the first part of jwgoes comments. Karjakin seems to genuinely believe what he is tweeting. Can a player be penalised for mental illness or delusions?
physica physica 3/21/2022 10:02
1) Chess is just a board game.
2) However, has enjoyed good reputation among ancient warlords how to 'dry run' their military actions.
3) Let's found a multinational organization to define undisputed world chess champion and team championship (Chess Olympiad)
4) Let's find out that world politics already controls the opinions how things should be run. Arguably the organization is very disliked.
4) The time passes, aversion continues. Kasparov forms PCA which quickly dies. At this point it's transparent that dirty money and schemers run Fide actions.
5) It's 2022, Fide is used as a platform to stage world politics. Warlords and politicians play chess with real people and sanctions.

Circle of life. Gens una sumus.
Jacob woge Jacob woge 3/21/2022 09:59
Time to quote Voltaire.

“I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it.”

The age of principles have long since gone. But, it’s still fun to quote, and to imagine how it must have felt to actually mean it.

Of course, nobody does, and perhaps never has.
Federer17 Federer17 3/21/2022 09:13
VERY GOOD!
Actually 6 months is not enough. Not because he is Russian. Not because he has some opinion.
But because of his provocative and absolutely disgusting tweets. A person like that has no place in the chess events of civilized world.
Well done.
Jack Nayer Jack Nayer 3/21/2022 08:41
Utter nonsense.
Opinions are free as long as they are my opinions.
Shameful.
chessgod0 chessgod0 3/21/2022 08:14
This is a truly outrageous decision that will open the door to other kinds of censorship in world chess. Mark my words, it won't be before players are banned for NOT supporting certain movements or activism.

This is a dark day for world chess.
Theochessman Theochessman 3/21/2022 08:11
I'm not a fan of war.
But I'm not a fan of censorship either...
JanneKejo JanneKejo 3/21/2022 07:37
What Karjakin has said according to FIDE (https://www.fide.com/docs/decisions-resolutions/FIDE%20EDC%20Decision%20case%202%202022.pdf) are simple facts. I support him in this case. What a pity that the western mainstream media has not told the western people what is and has been really going on in Ukraine and why. In my opinion this FIDE resolution damages the reputation of FIDE. Cheap populism.
guesting guesting 3/21/2022 07:02
Karjakin himself should be awarded with a 5 years ban. Support genocide is not an opinion, its a humanless behaviour.
jwgoes jwgoes 3/21/2022 06:54
This decision dishonors FIDE and the game of chess. Karjakin has his own views of the world. He has lived in Ukraine and Russia, and takes these things in an emotional way. I do not think his sincerity can be in doubt, whatever the validity of his opinion is.

Many chess players have repugnant opinions, and defend evil of various kinds (though perhaps popular evils). Once FIDE declares itself to be in the business of becoming arbiter of personal and political expression, it discredits itself and the game of chess. This marks a significant turning point in the history of FIDE and sport. All those involved in this decision should receive 5-year bans from chess - it would be much more appropriate.
Zdrak Zdrak 3/21/2022 06:46
Great, Ding Liren is in the Candidates!
ArqueiroNegro ArqueiroNegro 3/21/2022 06:42
Don't worry, Karyakin. This is just a special disciplinary operation by FIDE, nothing to see here. And now you have plenty of time to denazify your social media accounts. Get to work ;)