The Winning Academy 21: The Sharpest Middlegame

by Jan Markos
7/31/2023 – Opposite-coloured bishops (OCB) are tricky beasts. In many (but not all!) endgames, they turn the fight on the board into a boring tea-party, mostly ending in a draw. Many club players therefore expect that in the middlegame they will behave similarly. However, nothing can be further from truth. | Photo: pixabay.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

OCB middlegames are perhaps the sharpest middlegames in the chess world. Why? The reason is simple: these bishops never meet face-to-face. A light-squared bishop can never neutralize an attack of his dark-squared counterpart, and vice versa.

Therefore, in these middlegames the attacker is effectively a piece up. Thus, the main rule you should follow in OCB positions is: Attack! Do not look back, attack violently!

While the basic rule is simple enough, my experience as a coach is that the OCB middlegames are often being misevaluated and misplayed. For example, let us have a look at the following position:

Polgar-Anand, Mainz Rapid, 2003, Black to move:

Try to decide for yourself: Is White better, equal, or worse? What are the plans of both sides?

While many of my pupils (especially those rated under 2200) tend to be hypnotised by the c6-bishop and White´s queenside majority and usually answer that Polgar is equal or even slightly better.

The truth is that Black is winning. Why? Because in the OCB middlegames you have to attack and the most rewarding target of any attack is the king. And here, Black can organize an attack against the White king, making the white c6-bishop feel utterly useless.

Anand played 30…Kg7 and followed up with …h6-h5-h4 and …Rh8, destroying White´s kingside. Judit Polgar was totally helpless. Please, don´t forget to check the game in the viewer, it is definitely worth it.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be2 e5 The choice between the text and the Scheveningen continuation 6...e6 is largely a matter of taste. However, nowadays lines in the Sicilian with the move e5 are increasingly popular-not only the Najdorf, but also the Sveshnikov. 7.Nb3 Be7 8.0-0 Be6 8...0-0 is the other critical line of the 6.2 Najdorf, it occurred in the crucial 7-th game of the match. 9.Kh1 Nc6 10.Be3 10.f4 b5! 11.Bf3 Na5= 10...Be6 11.Qd2 a5 11...b5 12.Bf3 a5 13.a4 bxa4 14.Rxa4 Bd7 15.Ra3 d5 16.exd5 Nd4 17.Nxd4 Bxa3 18.bxa3 exd4 19.Bxd4 19.Qxd4 Rc8 20.Bg5± Timofeev 19...Rc8 20.Qd3 Re8 21.h3 h6 22.Nd1 Nh7 23.Ne3 Ng5 24.Bg4 Ne4 Timofeev,A-Kobalia,M/RUS-chT Togliatti/2003/ 12.Rfd1 a4 13.Nc1 a3!? 13...Ra5 5 14.Bf3 a3 14...Qc7 15.Qe2 Nb8 16.a3 Nbd7 17.N1a2 Nb6 18.Bxb6 Qxb6 19.Nb4 Qc5 20.Rd2 Bd8 21.Rad1 Bb6 22.Ncd5 Nxd5 23.Nxd5 Rd8 24.Bg4 Timofeev,A-Rashkovsky,N/RUS-ch Krasnoyarsk/2003/ 15.b3?! 15.Rb1! 15...Qc7 16.Nd3 Rc8 17.Rac1 h6! 18.h3 Nd4 19.Bxd4 exd4 20.Ne2 d5 21.e5 21.exd5 Nxd5 22.Nxd4 Bg5 23.Nxe6 fxe6 24.Qe2 Nc3! 25.Qxe6+ Kh8∞ vedie k zhruba vyrovnanej pozicii 21...Ne4 22.Qe1 Anand,V-Polgar,J/Mainz act/2003/ Bg5 13...Qc8 14.f3 Rd8 15.Bb6 Rd7 16.Nd5 Bd8 17.Bxd8 Qxd8 18.Bb5 Qa5 19.c4 Qxd2 20.Rxd2 Rdd8 21.Nb6 Ra5 22.Ne2 a3 23.b3 Kf8 24.Rad1 Ke7 25.Kg1 Ne8 26.Nc3± Short,N-Gelfand,B/Budapest/2003/ 14.Rb1 axb2 15.Rxb2 Qd7 16.f3 Rfc8 17.Nd5 Bxd5 18.exd5 Nd4 19.Bxd4 exd4 20.Qxd4 Qc7 21.Bd3 g6 22.Re1 Bf8 23.c4 Nd7 Timofeev,A-Sakaev,K/RUS-ch Krasnoyarsk/2003/ 9.f4 Qc7 10.Kh1 Some 30-40 years ago the main line was 10.f5 Bc4 11.a4 Nbd7 Nowadays especially thanks to Fischer it's known Black has sufficient his piece play balances the rather vague light-square weakness on d5. The clever waiting text-move became popular only later on. 10...h6N       Anand comes up with a novelty, the idea behind this inconspicuous move becomes clear, when we look at the alternatives. 10...0-0?! is typical castling "into it", after 11.f5 Bc4 12.g4! White has a dangerous d5!? Too passive is ≤12...h6?! 13.g5 hxg5 14.Bxg5 Nbd7 15.Rg1 Rfc8 16.Bxc4 Qxc4 17.Qf3 Kf8 18.a3 b5 19.Nd2 Qc6 20.Qh3 Short,N-Gelfand,B/Amsterdam/1996/ 13.g5!? 13.exd5 Rd8 14.Bxc4 Qxc4 15.Bg5 Nbd7∞ 13...Nxe4 14.Nxe4 dxe4 15.f6 Bd8 16.fxg7 Kxg7 17.Bxc4 Qxc4 18.Be3 Short has dealt a heavy blow to the other alternative, which was until recently considered playable: 10...Nbd7 11.g4! h6 11...exf4 12.g5 Ng8 13.Bxf4 h6 14.Nd5 Bxd5 15.Qxd5 hxg5 16.Qxf7+! Kxf7 17.Bxd6+± 12.g5 hxg5 13.fxg5 Nh7 14.Bg4!N 14.Nd5 Qd8!∞ 14...Nxg5 15.Bxg5 Bxg5 16.Bxe6 fxe6 17.Qg4 Bf4 18.Qxe6+ Kd8 19.Rad1! Re8 19...Rxh2+ 20.Kg1 Qb6+ 21.Nd4! 5,4+- 20.Qxd6 Qxd6 21.Rxd6 Ke7 22.Rg6± Short,N-Ghaem Maghami,E/Tehran m/2003/ 10...b5 11.a4!? b4 12.Nd5 Bxd5 13.exd5 ×b4, 10...exf4 11.Bxf4 is also pleasant for White, he has taken on f4 directly from c1 and has already made an important extra move 1. 11.Be3 Polgar plays a logical developing move, but interesting was also 11.Qe1!? 0-0 12.Qg3 Kh8 13.fxe5 dxe5 14.Nd4! 11.g4?! exf4 now doesn't make much sense. 11...Nbd7 12.Nd5!? Original, this transformation is more typical with the pawn still on f2. However here the position of the on h6 gives White chances on the 12.f5 Bc4 13.a4 0-0 14.a5 Rfc8 leads to the type of positions, mentioned in the note to 10.f5. Anand has already reached this position by transposition: 15.Bxc4 15.Ra4 Bb5!= 15...Qxc4 16.Qf3 Qc7! ≤16...Qc6 17.g4! Nh7 18.Nc1 Bg5 19.Nd3 Bxe3 20.Qxe3 Ndf6 21.Rg1 d5 22.Nb4 Asrian,K-Minasjan,A/ARM-ch/1999/ 17.Nd2 17.g4?! d5! 18.exd5 Bb4 17...Qd8 18.Rfc1 Rc7 19.Nd5 Nxd5 20.exd5 Rac8 21.c4 Bg5 22.b3 Bxe3 23.Qxe3 Nf6 Kolev,A-Anand,V/Villarrobledo act/2001/ 12...Bxd5 12...Nxd5? 13.exd5 Bf5 14.fxe5 Bxc2 15.Qd2 Bxb3 16.e6! עe8 13.exd5 0-0 14.c4 b6 14...a5 15.Rc1 15.fxe5 dxe5∞ 15...b6 -14...b6 ≤15...a4 16.Nd2 4 only helps White to get his moving. 15.Rc1 15.fxe5 dxe5!∞ with a dark-square blockade is far from clear. 15...Nxe5? 16.Nd4! 16.Rc1 16...Nxc4 17.Bxc4 Qxc4 18.Nf5 This line shows one of the downsides of 10...h6. 15...a5 16.Nd2 16.f5 shuts the White's planned would have good chances for success, if he would control e4. However, here after Nh7 5Black gets dark-square play. 16...Ne4 17.Qc2 Ndf6 17...Ndc5? 18.Nxc5 Nxc5 19.f6 18.Nd2 16...Rfe8 Black still can't resolve the tension advantageously, 16...exf4?! 17.Bxf4 Ne5 allows 18.Nb3! 4-f5 17.Bd3!? White is better and it's a matter of character, which plan to choose. There is nothing unexpected in Judit training her sights on Black's 17.Nb1 3-b5Shipov 17...Bf8 17...exf4 18.Bxf4 Ne5 18...Bf8 19.Nb3 4-f5 Ne5? 20.Bxh6 19.Bxe5!? dxe5 20.Qf3 4In this position the comparison of the speaks in White's favour (later in the game it will be different). 18.Bc2?! Now Black manages to consolidate. 18.f5 White wants to stop possible with a4. b5!? 19.cxb5 Qb7 20.a4!? 20.Ne4 Nxe4 21.Bxe4 Nf6 21...Qxb5? 22.f6! 22.Qd3 Nxe4 23.Qxe4 Qxb5 24.f6 g6!? and despite Black's locked 8 matters are not so clear. 20...Qxd5 21.Nc4 18.Qf3!? exf4 18...g6? 19.f5± 19.Qxf4 4,1,3-g3 is unpleasant, as White has clear methods to strengthen his attack and Black can't finish his regrouping with g6? 19...Ne5 20.Bb1 a4 21.Bd4 20.Bd4 Bg7 21.Ne4+- 18...exf4 19.Bxf4 g6! 20.Ba4 Bg7 Natural, but possibly even better was 20...Nh5!? 21.Qf3 Ne5 21.Bc6 21.Nf3 Nh5= An interesting tactical possibility was 21.c5 bxc5 22.Nc4 Ne4! 22...Bf8?! 23.Qf3  23.Bxd7 Qxd7 24.Nb6 Qb7 25.Nxa8 Rxa8 and Black's centralized compensates for the exchange. 21...Rad8 21...Rab8!? 22.Qf3?!       After the second inaccuracy Anand takes over the initiative and gives a model demonstration of dark-square strategy. 22.Bxd7 Nxd7 23.b3= 22.Bg3!? Nh5 23.Bh4 Rb8∞ 22...Ne5 23.Bxe5 23.Qh3 Nxc6 24.dxc6 Nh5 23...Rxe5 24.Rce1 Qe7 25.Qg3 Ng4! Control of e5 enables Black to close the . 25...Nh5?! 26.Qf2 Qc7 27.Nf3 gives the to White. 25...Ne4 26.Nxe4 Rxe4 27.Rxe4 27.Qf2!? 27...Qxe4 28.Qf2 Rf8 29.b3 Bd4 30.Qd2= and Black's forces are not as well coordinated, as later in the game. 26.Nf3 Rxe1 27.Rxe1 Ne5 Although Black's edge is still not too large, it's difficult to defend such a position in a rapid game. Just as Larsen said long ago, Black is better not despite, but because of the 28.a3 28.Nd4 Qg5!? 28...Qc7 28...Qf8!? exchanges the but forces the to defend the ×b6. 29.Nxe5? This gives Black's advantage a more permanent form, White should have tried to keep the on the board with 29.Nd4!? The modest Qe7 seems better, but Black's edge still remains rather volatile. 29...Nxc4 30.Nb5 Qc8 30...Qb8 31.Re7 31.Qf2! Nxb2?! 32.Nxd6! 29...Bxe5 30.Qf2 Kg7 TUTO 31.b4 This active attempt gives Black's pieces more open space, but passivity is not much better. Black can play e.g., 8,h5-h4,f5 etc. axb4 32.axb4 h5 33.Qe3?! Consistent with White's 31-st move was 33.c5!? bxc5 34.bxc5 dxc5 34...Qa7 35.Qg1!? 34...Rb8!? 35.Qxc5 Therefore Rb8!? is better, but here White certainly has more chances to save the game than later on. 35...Bxh2 36.Re7 Qd6 36...Qb8 37.Qc3+ Kg8 38.Qf6 Qf4 39.Rxf7= 37.Qa7 Rf8 38.Be8 38.Rd7? Qf4 39.Qa4 Qxa4 40.Bxa4 Bg3-+ 38...Qf4 38...Bg3 39.Rxf7+ Rxf7 40.Qxf7+ Kh6 41.Qe6= 39.Rxf7+ 39.Bxf7? Bg3!-+ and Black's hides on g5 or h4. 39...Rxf7 40.Qxf7+! 40.Bxf7? Qh4! 40...Qxf7 41.Qd4+! Qf6 42.Qa7+ Kh6 43.Kxh2 Qe5+ and the with an extra on one flank gives only practical winning chances. 41.Be6+ Bc7+ 41...Kh6 42.Bh3 42.Bh3 Qg3 43.d6! Otherwise the stays trapped in the corner Qxd6 44.Kg1 g5 and despite the simplification Black's play on the dark squares remains dangerous. 40...Qxf7 41.Bxf7 Kxf7 42.Kxh2 g5 42...Kf6 43.g4! h4 44.g5+ Kxg5 45.Kh3= 43.Kg3 Kf6 44.Kf3 Ke5 45.d6 Kxd6 46.Ke4 Ke6 47.g3! Kf6 48.Kf3= Kf5 49.g4+! 33...Qa7 34.g3 Tries to solve the basic rank problem, but Anand immediately exploits the new ×. However, it's already too late for 34.c5 bxc5 35.bxc5 Rb8 5 36.g3 h4! 37.cxd6 37.gxh4 Qa2 38.Re2 Rb2! 39.Rxb2 Qxb2 40.Qg1 dxc5-+ 37...Qxe3 38.Rxe3 h3 39.Re1 Bxd6 5,g5-g4,f4-+ and White's remains pinned to the 1-st rank forever. 34...h4! 35.gxh4?! The 4 makes White understandably nervous, but there is no way to resolve the tension advantageously. 35.g4 Qa2 36.Qe2 Qb3 37.b5 Rc8 7-a7-+ 35.Re2 hxg3 36.hxg3 Rh8+ 37.Kg2 Qa1 These lines illustrate White's main problem-in the long run he can't prevent the penetration of Black's major pieces into his position. The text decisively weakens the but even after the better 35.Qb3 h3! White starts running out of moves: 35...Rh8 36.Kg2 hxg3 37.hxg3 Qa6 38.Bd7!? f5 is less convincing. 36.Rf1 36.Kg1 b5+ 37.Kf1 bxc4 38.Qxc4 Qa3-+ 36...f5 /-+ 35...Rh8 36.Qf2 Bf6 37.Rf1 Qe7-+ 38.Re1 38.Qxb6?? Qe4+ 39.Kg1 Bd4+-+ 38...Qd8 39.Re2 39.c5 Bxh4 40.Qd4+ Bf6 5 is similar to the game. 39...Bxh4 40.Qf4 Bg5 41.Qf2 Bf6 42.c5 bxc5 43.bxc5 Qb8!-+ c5,4 Dark-square strategy! Premature was 43...Be5?! 44.Rxe5 dxe5 45.d6 44.cxd6 44.Qg3 dxc5 45.Qxb8 Rxb8 46.Rc2 46.d6? Rb6-+ 46...Be7-+ was a way to prolong the game, although the is technically lost. Now the will decide faster. 44...Qxd6 45.Qe3 Rh5 46.Rf2 Be5 47.Qf3 Qe7 Anand is careful and doesn't want to allow even 47...Bxh2!? 48.Qxh5 48.Qxf7+ Kh6-+ 48...gxh5 49.Rxh2 Qf4-+ although White can't achieve a fortress. White sorely misses his on f3. 48.Re2 More resilient, but insufficient was 48.d6 Qa7!? 48...Bxd6 /-+ 49.d7 Qa1+ 50.Rf1 Rxh2+ 51.Kg1 Qa7+ 52.Rf2 Rxf2 53.Qxf2 Bd4 54.d8Q Bxf2+-+ and by combining the against White's bare with the advance of his Black wins. 48...Qg5 1 49.Qf1 Qg3 50.Qf2 50.Qg2 Qd3 51.Rf2 Qb1+ 52.Qg1 Qe4+ 53.Rg2 Rh8!-+ 8-b1 50...Qd3 51.h4 After 51.Re3 Qd1+ 51...Rxh2+-+ 51...Qc4-+ 52.Re1 the most convincing win is Rxh2+! 53.Qxh2 Qxe1+ 54.Qg1 Qe2 55.d6 55.Bd7 Qf3+ 56.Qg2 Qd1+ 57.Qg1 Qxd5+-+ 55.Ba4 Qe4+-+ 55.Bb7 Qf3+ 56.Qg2 Qh5+ 57.Kg1 Bd4+ 58.Kf1 Qd1# 55...Qh5+ 56.Kg2 Qg4+ 57.Kf1 Qc4+-+ 51...Qh3+ 52.Kg1 Rxh4 1#,4 52...Rxh4 53.Qxh4 Qxh4 54.Rxe5 Qd4+-+ 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Polgar,J2718Anand,V27740–12003B92Mainz m4

***

In OCB middlegames, the attacking prospects are usually worth more than a pawn. In the following example, I will show you a very simplified middlegame (or a sharp endgame, if you want), which is also often misjudged by my students:

Giri-Tiviakov, Amsterdam 2015 (line), White to move:

Usually, my pupils expect White to experience no problems at all, although they understand that converting the extra pawn is far from easy. However, Tiviakov assessed this position as slightly better for Black. From a practical point of view, he was correct. While objectively equal, Giri´s position is difficult to defend. I usually let my pupils to play several blitz games against Stockfish, and most of them lose twice or three times until they find the correct defensive method. (A rather sadistic way of coaching, I know, but an effective one.)

So, what should White do? There are several interesting ideas at his disposal. Firstly, he might play h2-h4-h5xg6, opening Black´s king to possible perpetual checks. (In OCB positions, you should attack, remember!) Also, at the right moment White might play c2-c3 or a2-a3, perhaps even sacrificing a pawn while giving his own king a bit of a breathing space.

A move you should avoid is b2-b3, as this push would severely weaken the dark squares around your king. In OCB middlegames, we avoid putting pawns around the king on the colour of our own bishop.

Here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Nf6 In one of my previous videos made for CBM I explained to the reader the serious problems which Scandinavian Defence players are facing now. So before the Dutch championship I did some serious work in order to find a replacement to the Scandinavian Defence for strong tournaments. And my choice fell on the line with 3...6, being played by the world's top players like Shirov, Morozevich and others. Previously I had played only 3...dxe4 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3 Nc6 7.Be3 cxd4 The line chosen by me in the game against Giri is not the only one which is playable. In the last round of the Dutch championship I chose another one - 7...Be7 which brought me a good position from the opening, although later I took too much of a risk, playing g7-g5 and losing. 8.Qd2 0-0 9.dxc5 Bxc5 10.0-0-0 Qb6 11.Nd4 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 Bxd4 13.Qxd4 Qxd4 14.Rxd4 a6 15.Be2 b6N 15...Nb8!? 15...f6 16.b3 Ra7 17.Kb2 Rc7 18.Nd1 Bb7 19.Ne3 b5 20.a4 bxa4 21.Rxa4 g5 21...Nc5 22.Ng4 f5 23.exf6 Nxf6 24.fxg5 Ne4 25.Re1 Nxg5 26.Bxa6 Bxa6 27.Rxa6 Rf4 28.h3 h5 29.g3 Rf3 30.Ne5 Rxg3 31.h4 Ne4 32.Rxe6 Kh7 33.Rc6 Rxc6 34.Nxc6 Rh3 35.Ne7 Rxh4 36.Nxd5 Kg6 37.b4 Kf5 38.Kb3 Rh3+ 39.Kc4 h4 40.b5 Rg3 41.b6 Rg7 42.Kd4 Nd6 43.c4 Rg4+ 44.Kc5 Nb7+ 45.Kb4 Re4 46.Ne7+ Ke5 47.Ng6+ Kf5 48.Rxe4 Kxe4 49.Nxh4 Ke5 50.Kb5 Kd4 51.Nf5+ Ke5 52.c5 Kxf5 53.c6 Nd6+ 54.Ka6 1-0 Bok,B-Tiviakov,S/Amsterdam 2015 (54) 7...a6 is another popular option. 8.Nxd4 Bc5 9.Qd2 0-0 10.0-0-0 a6 11.Kb1 Nxd4 12.Bxd4 b5 Now we came to a very popular position with a huge number of games played here. White can choose betewen 9 possible moves. 13.g3 Being surprised by my opening choice, Anish decides to go away from the main theoretical lines and chooses a rather rare continuation. But even with deep preparation it is not so easy to find an advantage for White. Let's discuss the main plans for both sides. It is obvious that White should play on the kingside, Black should try to develop the attack on the queenside. When playing on the kingside White can choose between pushing the h- and/or g-pawns or preparing the advance f4-f5-f6. Also attacking the pawn on e6. The latter plan is the one chosen by my opponent in this game. b4 In this game Black chooses the most typical plan beginning by pushing the queenside pawns as quickly as possible in order to activate the 'bad' bishop on c8 by creating the possibility to develop it to a6 if necessary. 13...Qc7 is another possibility, keeping an eye on the e5-pawn , making the planned advance f4-f5 more difficult 14.h4 14.Qe3 Bb7 15.Bd3 Bxd4 16.Qxd4 Qc5 17.Ne2 Rac8 18.Rhe1 b4 19.f5 Qxd4 20.Nxd4 Nc5 21.g4 Rfe8 22.f6 g6 23.g5 a5 24.Nb5 Red8 25.Nd6 Rc7 26.Bf1 Ba6 27.Bxa6 Nxa6 28.Rd4 Nc5 29.Rh4 Ne4 30.Nxe4 dxe4 31.Rhxe4 Rd2 32.R4e2 Rcxc2 33.Rxd2 Rxd2 34.Rc1 h5 35.Rc8+ Kh7 36.Rf8 Rd7 37.b3 h4 38.h3 Rd3 39.Rxf7+ Kg8 40.Rg7+ Kf8 41.Rxg6 Rxh3 42.Rh6 Rh1+ 43.Kc2 Kg8 44.g6 Rg1 45.g7 Kf7 46.Rh8 1-0 Ikeda,J-Schon,E/Tuggeranong 2007/CBM 116 ext (46) 14...Nb6 15.Ne2 Bd7 16.Rh2 Rfc8 17.Ng1 b4 18.Nf3 Bf8 19.g4 Nc4 20.Qg2 Rab8 21.Bd3 Bb5 22.Ng5 h6 23.Qh3 Bc5 24.Bxc5 Qxc5 25.Re1 Na3+ 26.Kc1 Bxd3 27.Qxd3 Nxc2 28.Qh7+ Kf8 29.Rxc2 Qxc2+ 30.Qxc2 hxg5 31.fxg5 Rxc2+ 32.Kxc2 Rc8+ 33.Kb3 Rc4 34.Rg1 Re4 35.Rg2 a5 36.Ka4 Rxe5 37.Kxa5 Re4 38.Kb5 f6 39.g6 Ke7 40.h5 Ke8 41.a4 bxa3 42.bxa3 d4 43.a4 Re3 44.a5 Ra3 45.a6 e5 46.g5 Ke7 47.h6 Ra1 48.h7 Rb1+ 49.Kc6 Rb8 50.a7 Rd8 51.Rh2 1-0 Kelly,P-Hunt Grubbe,H/Sunningdale 2006/CBM 115 ext (51) 14.Ne2 The knight on a4 is clearly far away from the main area of the game and Black has no difficulties equalising after 14.Na4 Bxd4 15.Qxd4 Qa5 16.b3 Bb7= 17.Nb2 Rfc8 18.Bg2 Qc7 19.c4 bxc3 20.Rc1 c2+ 21.Ka1 a5 22.Rhe1 Nc5 23.Re2 Ra6 24.Rexc2 Rc6 25.Kb1 Nxb3 26.Rxc6 Qxc6 27.Rxc6 Nxd4 28.Rxc8+ Bxc8 29.Na4 Ba6 30.Kb2 Kf8 31.Nc5 Bb5 32.a4 Be2 33.Kc3 Nc6 34.Kd2 Bc4 35.Bf3 Ke7 36.Kc3 f6 37.exf6+ gxf6 38.g4 e5 39.fxe5 fxe5 40.g5 Kf7 41.Bh5+ Ke7 42.Bg4 Nd4 43.h4 Be2 44.Bxe2 Nxe2+ 45.Kd3 Nd4 46.h5 Ne6 47.Nb7 Nxg5 48.Nxa5 Kd6 49.Nb3 Ne6 0-1 Blair,D-Halliwell,A/England 1994/Corr Nr. 1 (49) 14...a5 Besides the text move Black could have also played 14...Qc7!? with equality. For example, 15.Qe3 15.Bxc5 Qxc5= 15...Bb7 15...a5= 16.h4 Be7 17.h5 h6 18.Ng1 a5 19.Nf3 a4 20.g4 a3 21.b3 Rfc8 22.g5 Qxc2+ 0-1 Goldmund-BigMomma/Internet Chess Club 2006/Computer & Internet 2011 (22) 15.Bh3N Only this move is new. 15.Bxc5 was played in a game almost 25 years ago when Black had no difficulties equalising either: Nxc5 16.Bg2 Qb6= 16...Qc7= 16...Bb7= 17.Qe3 Bb7 18.Nd4 a4 19.Rhe1 Ne4 20.Bxe4 dxe4 21.Nf5 Qc7 22.Nd6 b3 23.axb3 axb3 24.Qxb3 Bd5 25.c4 Rfb8 26.Qc3 Bc6 27.Kc1 Ra2 28.Nb5 Bxb5 29.cxb5 Qb6 30.Qc4 Ra1+ 31.Kc2 Raa8 32.Rd6 Qa5 33.Rxe4 Rxb5 34.Qa4 Rc5+ 35.Kb1 Qxa4 36.Rxa4 Rac8 37.Rad4 g5 38.Rd8+ Rxd8 39.Rxd8+ Kg7 40.Rd4 gxf4 41.gxf4 f6 42.b4 Rb5 43.exf6+ Kxf6 44.Kc2 Rh5 45.Kb3 Rh3+ 46.Ka4 Rxh2 47.b5 Ra2+ 48.Kb4 Rb2+ 49.Ka5 h5 50.b6 h4 ½-½ Elseth,R-Gausel,E/Oslo 1991/CBM 023 (50) 15.h4 Ba6 16.h5 Qb6 17.c3 Rfc8 18.g4 bxc3 19.Bxc3 Be3 20.Bd4 Bxd2 21.Bxb6 Bd3+ 22.Ka1 Bxe2 23.Bxe2 Bxf4 24.Bd4 Bxe5 0-1 Hanson,A-Amann,K/IECG email 2001/Corr 2008 (24) 15...Qc7 15...Re8!? was also in the style of the position, not only over-protecting the pawn on e6, but also attacking the e5-pawn when f5 exf5 would be played. 16.Rhe1 Re8 17.f5 White can no longer improve the position, so he has to make this move, connected with a temporary pawn sacrifice. Nxe5 It looks risky to take the pawn on f5 since after 17...exf5 18.Nf4 White can develop an initiative. E.g. Nb6 18...Nxe5 19.Nxd5+- 18...Qc6 is not good after 19.Bg2! 19.e6 fxe6 20.Bxf5 Nf8 21.Bxg7 Kxg7 22.Nh5+ Kh8 23.Qh6 Ra7 24.Qf6+ Kg8 25.Qg5+ Kh8 26.Qf6+= 19.Bxc5 Nxc5 20.Qxd5 Qxd5 21.Nxd5 Ra7= 19.Bxf5 Nxe5 20.Bxh7+ Kxh7 21.Rxe5 Rxe5 22.Bxe5 Bb7 23.Bd4 19...Nb6 20.c4± with advantage for White 19.Nh5 with slightly better chances. 18.Bxe5 After 18.Bxc5 Qxc5 19.Nf4 Nf3 20.Qe3 Qxe3 21.Rxe3 Ng5 22.Bg2 Ne4= the ending is equal. 18...Qxe5 19.Nf4 Qd6 20.Nxd5 The analysis engine prefers to exchange the queens and go into an ending, although, of course, it is difficult to believe that White can get a substantial advantage in an ending where Black has the bishop pair in an open position. 20.Qxd5 Qxd5 21.Nxd5 Ra7 22.Nf4 22.fxe6 Bxe6 23.Nf4 Rd7 24.Rc1 Rd6= 22...Rae7 23.fxe6 fxe6 24.Bf1 g5 25.Nd3 Bb6 26.Ne5 After 20.f6 White doesn't have enough resources to create an attack and Black has many possibilities to neutralise white threats. E.g. Bb7 20...e5 21.Bxc8 Raxc8 22.Nxd5 Qe6 23.fxg7 Red8= 20...g6 21.Nxd5 Qd8 22.Ne7+ Bxe7 23.Qh6 Bxf6 24.Rxd8 Rxd8= 21.fxg7 e5 22.Nxd5 Rad8 23.Bg2 Bd4 24.Ne3 Bxg2 25.Qxg2 Qg6= 25...Qe6= 20...e5?! 20...Bd7 would be a more simple way to equality. After 21.Nf6+ 21.fxe6 Bxe6 22.Bxe6 Rxe6= 22...fxe6= 21...gxf6 22.Qxd6 Bxd6 23.Rxd6 exf5 24.Rxe8+ Rxe8= Black has nothing to worry about. 21.Qe2 21.Qg5 h6 22.Qg4 Rb8= is not dangerous for Black at all. 21...Bb7 22.Bg2 Winning the b4-pawn, opening lines on the queenside is very dangerous for White: 22.Nxb4 Bd4 23.c3 Qh6 22...e4! I was not able to foresee all the consequences of this pawn sacrifice clearly, but made the move very quickly. Sometimes you need to trust intuition and follow chess principles, like opening the position for the bishops and rooks (like in this case). After 22...Qb8 23.Qc4± White has a serious advantage. 23.Nc3?! White became scared and decided to exchange one of the black bishops, but by keeping a cool head, simply taking the pawn (a pawn is a pawn!) he could have kept a small advantage by 23.Bxe4 a4 or 23...Rad8 24.c4! 24.Ne3 24.f6 Bxd5 25.Rxd5 Qxd5 26.Bxd5 Rxe2 27.Rxe2 Rd8 28.Rd2 Re8 29.c3 bxc3 30.bxc3 gxf6 with a better pawn structure in an ending. 23...Qf6 24.Nxe4 Bxe4 It was possible to simply take the pawn on f5. But in my calculations I hadn't seen the move 28...5! 24...Qxf5 25.Qb5 25.Nf6+ gxf6 26.Qxe8+ Rxe8 27.Rxe8+ Bf8! 28.Bxb7 Qb5-+ 25...Bxe4 26.Rxe4 Rxe4 27.Bxe4 Qxe4 28.Qxc5= 25.Bxe4 Rac8 25...a4 was also possible with compensation for the pawn. 26.Qb5 Keeping material on the board by 26.Qc4 a4 would be risky for White since the material advantage here is not very important but what matters is the safety of the kings (in the positions with the opposite coloured bishops in the presence of the major pieces). So it is better for White to exchange several major pieces, which is exactly what my opponent is doing. 26...Bd4 27.Bb7 Rxe1 28.Rxe1 Rf8 29.Re8 Qb6 or 29...g6 30.Rxf8+ Kxf8 31.Qxa5 Qe7 32.c3 bxc3 33.Qa3= with a draw 30.Qd7?! It was better to exchange not only the rooks but the queens as well by 30.Rxf8+ Kxf8 31.Qxb6 Bxb6= with an immediate draw. 30...Bf6 31.Bf3 h6 Inside my head I had already resigned myself to a draw and failed to understand that Black was standing better and could have continued playing for a win by 31...g6 32.Rxf8+ Kxf8 33.Bd1 Kg7 34.fxg6 hxg6 TUTO with slightly better chances despite being a pawn down in an ending with opposite coloured bishops. What matters again is the situation of the kings. The black king is much safer and Black can play for an attack! 35.Qd3 Qg1 36.h4 32.Rxf8+ Kxf8 33.Qc8+ Ke7 34.Qb7+ And here the game ended in a draw. Without much trouble with Black I had been able to get a draw against one of the world's strongest players, despite playing the variation for the 1st time in my life! ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2791Tiviakov,S2639½–½2015C11NED-ch1

***

Sometimes there is no attack against the king in sight. What to do then? Let us have a look how Anatoly Karpov solved this riddle:

Karpov-Khalifman, Linares 1995, White to move:

Well, this position seems to be pretty boring and drawish, don’t you think? How should White add life and sharpness to this dull situation?

Karpov did something unexpected. He played 23.d5!?, putting his central pawn on the colour of his own bishop. Now how should Black answer? If he takes on d5, White retakes with his bishop, centralizing this important piece. Khalifman took a different pawn with 23…dxc4?, but after 24.dxe6! Karpov nevertheless got the d5-outpost, as it transpired that after 24…Qxe6 (24…fxe6 considerably weakens Black´s kingside) 25.bxc4 the white c4-pawn is taboo because of the bishop fork on d5.

The only correct way for Black was 23…e5!, enabling Karpov to get a majority on the queenside, but threatening to get counterplay with …f7-f5 and …e5-e4. Yes, you already know it: in the OCB positions you should always look for any counterplay you can get.

In the following fight, Karpov misplayed on several occasions and Khalifman got some counterplay. In the diagrammed position, Black is to move and ready to consume the unprotected a6-pawn.

However, Khalifman was not careful enough. He took on a6 immediately 35…Qxa6? and after the logical 36.Rb7! Rf8 37.Re2! he was completely tied up to the vulnerable f7-square. All Karpov had to do was to put the e2-rook to f3, hitting f7 once more, and Black´s position was smashed into pieces.

Instead of the naïve 35…Qxa6, Black should have remembered that attack in more than material in the OCB positions and played the prophylactical 35…Rc7! Then after 36.Rb7 Rdd7! the 7th rank is well defended and the a6-pawn is still looking as a nice snack for the black Queen.

And here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nf3 Bg7 4.g3 c5 5.Bg2 Qa5+ 6.Nc3 Ne4 7.Bd2 7.Qd3 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Nc5 9.Qd1 Nc6 10.Be3 Ne6 11.Nxe6 Bxc3+ 12.bxc3 dxe6 13.0-0∞ 7...Nxd2 8.Qxd2 0-0 9.e3 d6 10.0-0 Nc6 11.h3 11.d5 Ne5= 11...cxd4 12.Nxd4 Bd7 13.Rfd1 White can hope for a small advantage only because his "e" pawn is still on e3. Otherwise would the absence of dark squared bishop promise small edge to his opponent. Nxd4?! 13...Rfc8 14.b3 a6 15.Rac1∞ 14.exd4 Bc6 15.Nd5 15.Rac1 Bxg2 16.Kxg2= 15...Qd8 15...Qxd2? 16.Nxe7+ Kh8 17.Rxd2 Bxg2 18.Kxg2± 16.Rac1 Rc8 17.h4 Qd7 18.b3 Rfd8 19.a4 Bxd5 Khalifman tries to save the game due to opposite colour bishops. Karpov is an excellent technician and he manages to make black's life rather misserable. 19...b6 20.Nb4 Bxg2 21.Kxg2 Qb7+ 21...a5 22.Nd5± 22.d5 20.Bxd5 TOTO b6 21.a5 e6 21...b5 22.a6± 22.Bf3 b5 23.d5! This is the main point, black will have inferior pawn structure in any variation. bxc4 23...e5 24.cxb5 Qxb5 25.b4± 24.dxe6 Qxe6 24...fxe6 25.bxc4± 25.bxc4 Qf5 25...Rxc4 26.Bd5 Rxc1 27.Bxe6 Rxd1+ 28.Qxd1 fxe6 29.Qc1 e5 30.Qc7± 26.Kg2 26.Bd5 26...Bf6 27.a6 h5 28.Re1?! Interesting inaccuracy, white could have prevented activisation of both black's rooks. 28.Bd5 Rb8 29.Bb7± 28...Rc5! 29.Bd5 Rb8! 30.Rc2 Kg7 31.Be4 31.Re3 Rb1 32.Rf3 Qe5 31...Qd7 32.Bb7 Qc7 33.Qd3 Rd8 34.Bd5 34.Rb1 d5! 34...Qa5 35.Rb1 Qxa6 35...Rc7 36.Rb7 36.Rb7 Rf8 37.Re2 Ra5? 37...Qa5 38.Re6! Rc7 39.Rxd6 39.Rxf6 Kxf6 40.Qd4+ Ke7 39...Rxb7 40.Bxb7 Rd8 41.c5 Rxd6 42.cxd6 38.Re3! Ra1 39.Rf3 Re1 40.Rxf6! Kxf6 41.Qf3+ 41.Qf3+ Kg7 41...Ke5 42.Qf4# 42.Rxf7+ Rxf7 43.Qxf7+ Kh6 44.Qf8+ Kh7 45.Qg8+ Kh6 46.Qh8# 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Karpov,A2780Khalifman,A26351–01995E60Linares 13th7

***

What to take away from this part of The Winning Academy? Please remember, that:

  1. The opposite-coloured bishops middlegames are usually very sharp, unlike the OCB endgames.
  2. In these middlegames you should be very active. You should try to attack, preferably the opponents king. If worse, you should prefer active counterplay to passive defence. Fortresses are very rare in OCB middlegames.
  3. Attacking prospects are often worth more than a pawn or two, as the attacking side is effectively a piece up.
  4. Try to put your pawns on the colour of the opponent’s bishop, restricting its activity. (This is also different from the OCB endgames. In the endgames you often want to have pawns on the colour of your own bishop, keeping it safe from the opponent´s bishop. However, in middlegames you are protecting space rather than pawns themselves.)
  5. Enjoy these positions! Being so sharp, the OCB middlegames tend to be fun to play!

Links

See also: Summer Special: Jan Markos: Middlegame Strategy


Jan Markos is a Slovakian chess author, trainer, and grandmaster. His book Under the Surface was the English Chess Federation´s 2018 Book of the Year. His last book, The Secret Ingredient, co-authored with David Navara, focuses on the practical aspects of play, e.g. time-management over the board, how to prepare against a specific opponent, or how to use chess engines during the training process. Markos was the U16 European Champion twenty years ago. At present he helps his pupils from several countries to achieve similar successes. Apart from focusing on the royal game, he is also the author of several non-chess books, focused on critical thinking, moral dilemmas, and phenomenology.

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.