The Winning Academy 20: Simple means safe

by Jan Markos
7/17/2023 – "KISS", which stands for "Keep it simple, stupid!", is a design principle first formulated by the US Navy in 1960, but which quickly caught on. KISS suggests that simplicity is preferable to complexity in most systems. Chess is no exception - Jan Markos knows more. | Photo: Jimee, Jackie, Tom & Asha on Flickr.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

"The most difficult task in chess is to win a won game."

I had heard this sentence from my coaches so many times as a teenager! And of course, for a good reason: before I turned 18, I had accumulated a respectable track record of spoiled winning positions in important games.

Why? After getting a decisive edge, I somehow expected that the game would finish automatically, by inertia. However, this is simply wrong. At a chessboard, you need to be careful and vigilant at all times.

And what exactly is your task when having a decisive advantage? Well, you need to turn a complicated winning position into a simple winning position. Simple means safe. In a simple position, it is usually quite difficult to go wrong. And thus, you will almost certainly get your deserved full point.

Good technique in chess simply equals to the ability to untie the Gordian knots arising on the board. Let's have a look at several examples:

Topalov-Carlsen, Bilbao 2008, White to move:

White is a pawn up and Carlsen's king is very vulnerable. There is surely more than one way how to finish the game with a direct attack. And honestly, this is exactly what I would have expected from Topalov, a renowned tactician.

However, the Bulgarian Super-GM kept his calm. He decided to win in the simplest and smoothest way. He played the prosaic 44.Nd6! and after 44…Qd7 he simplified into a won endgame: 45.Nxf7 Qxd2 46.Rxd2 Kxf7. In fact, this endgame is so easily won that after 47.c4 Ke7 48.Kc3 Carlsen resigned.

Surely this was not the most spectacular way how to finish the game. But a win against Carlsen is always an exceptional success and Topalov wanted to make sure that he will get the job done.

Here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 One of the theoretical highlights of year 2008 has undoubtedly been the appearance of the Dragon Sicilian on the highest level. This happened thanks to efforts of Magnus Carlsen, who starting with the tournament in Baku (April 2008) fearlessly implemented the Dragon against 1.e4 in almost all his Black games. The Norwegian found new ideas and came with a fresh look at many Sicilian Dragon positions. In this extremely important game (a direct fight for the tournament victory in the Grand Slam Final) Magnus remains true to his style and goes for the Dragon again. On the other side Veselin Topalov shouldn't be invited twice to challenge his opponents in principled opening variations. The Bulgarian goes for what represents the most critical variation of the Sicilian Dragon these days. 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 Nc6 8.Qd2 0-0 9.Bc4 Bd7 10.0-0-0 Rc8 At this moment "the Chinese Variation" - 10...Rb8 is a worthy alternative to the main 10...Rc8. Its theory's development still has a long way before coming to sensible conclusions. 11.Bb3 Ne5 12.Kb1 About ten years ago this strong waiting move, useful in many further complications, started quickly to gain popularity and meanwhile became White's main weapon against the Dragon. Black's problem is that all active moves have certain drawbacks. 12.g4 b5! 12...a6 This is one of Magnus' amazing findings in the Dragon. The modest advance of the a-pawn used to have a very bad reputation: those players who tried 12...a6 in the past (also including GMs) were simply swept away in those games. This is explained by the fact that White starts a direct attack next and the move 12...a6 usually turns out to be a loss of tempo. Certainly Carlsen analyzed and tested the position a lot and must have come to the surprising conclusion that Black has sufficient potential for defence and counterplay. We'll see that actually the Norwegian wonderboy might be right - Black's position has indeed many hidden resources. But there is still a big problem: now even a small inaccuracy in defence from Black can easily be fatal. Thus in order to play well the resulting positions both sides (and especially Black) need the precision of a computer. Practice has shown that White retains better prospects after the more active moves: 12...a5 13.a4 12...b5 13.Ndxb5 12...Nc4 13.Bxc4 Rxc4 14.g4 b5 Comparied to 12.g4 b5, here the f3-pawn is not under attack and White can take on b5: 15.b3! Rc8 16.Ndxb5 Theeory has established that Black has serious problems here. In the past decade Black's main reply has become the defensive waiting move: 12...Re8 13.h4 In the second round of the same tournament (a week prior to the present game) Ivanchuk against Carlsen continued 13.Rhe1 Surprisingly, this move required from the Ukrainian around 40 minutes of thinking over the board. Then after b5 14.Bh6 Bxh6 15.Qxh6 instead of the typical, but rather questionable exchange sacrifice on c3, Black had the attractive possibility a5 15...Rxc3 16.bxc3 a5 17.f4 Neg4 18.Qh4 a4 19.Bxf7+ In the game the following wild complications lead to a draw, but there are possibilities to improve: Rxf7 20.e5 Nd5 21.e6 Nxc3+ 22.Kc1 White has the advantage after 22.Ka1! Bxe6 23.Nxe6 Qc8 24.Rd4 Nxa2 25.Qh3! Qxc2 26.Qf3 22...Bxe6 23.Nxe6 Qa5 24.Qxg4 Nxa2+ 25.Kb2 Qc3+ 26.Kxa2 Qxc2+ 27.Ka1 Qc3+ 28.Kb1 Qb3+ 29.Ka1 Qc3+ 1/2-1/2 Ivanchuk,V (2781)-Carlsen,M (2775)/Bilbao 2008 16.Ndxb5 Bxb5 17.Nxb5 a4 18.Bxa4 18.Bd5 Qb6 19.Nd4 Rc5 18...Qa5 19.b3 Rc5 13...h5 14.g4 hxg4 15.h5 Nxh5 16.Rdg1 The most critical position of the line 12.Kb1 these days. Rc5N Carlsen doesn't wait for Topalov to demonstrate his preparation and instead comes up with a good novelty. The queen is kept on d8 for defence. Previously 16...Qa5 was played: 17.Bh6 Bf6!? 17...Rxc3? turned out to lose right away in the rapid game Anand-Carlsen, Mainz 2008: 18.Bxg7 Kxg7 19.Rxh5!+- 17...Rc5 is the position which could also arise in the main game, see 17...Qa5 instead of 17...Kh7. 18.Rh4 Nxf3 19.Nxf3 Bxc3 20.bxc3 Qxc3 21.Qxc3 Rxc3 22.Bxf8 Kxf8 18.fxg4 Bxg4 and now instead of accepting the positional exchange sacrifice White must disturb the stability of the black pieces on the kingside with the surprising 19.Bf4 which leads to advantage. 19.Bxf8 Kxf8 20.Qe3 Rxc3 21.Qxc3 21.bxc3!? 21...Qxc3 22.bxc3 e6 0-1 Karjakin,S (2727)-Radjabov,T (2744)/Sochi 2008 (52). offered Black excellent compensation for two exchanges. 16...Nc4 17.Bxc4 Rxc4 18.fxg4 Nf6 19.Nf5! 17.Bh6 The immediate 17.f4!? was an interesting alternative: Nc4 18.Bxc4 Rxc4 19.f5 e5 After 19...Nf6 20.Bh6! Black probably must play the dubious position by retreating the bishop to h8, since Not 20.fxg6? fxg6 20...Nxe4 21.Nxe4 wins for White: Rxd4 21...Bxd4 22.f6!+- 22.Qh2+- 19...Qa5 20.Rxg4 Rxc3 20...Rfc8 21.Rxh5! Rxc3 21...gxh5 22.Rg1+- 22.bxc3 is the same 21.bxc3 Rc8 22.Rxh5 Rxc3! 22...gxh5 23.Rg1+- 22...Qxc3 23.Rh2+- 23.Rh2 Qb6+ 24.Kc1 Rxe3 25.Qxe3 Qxd4 25...Bxd4 26.Qb3 20.fxe6 fxe6 21.Rxg4 Qf6 22.Nde2 17...Kh7! Forcing the exchange of bishops on g7 reduces White's attacking potential (apart from gaining more air for the king, the rook will be able to go to h8 and the pawn on g6 won't be pinned anymore). After other moves Black is in troubles: 17...Qa5 18.Rh4! Nxf3 19.Nxf3 gxf3 Better is to exchange queens with 19...Bxc3 20.bxc3 Qxc3 21.Qxc3 Rxc3 22.Bxf8 Kxf8 even if after 23.Ng5 There is no question about White's advantage. E.g. Kg7 24.Bxf7 Kf6 25.e5+! Kxg5 26.e6 Bxe6 27.Bxe6 Nf6 27...Kxh4 28.Rxg4+ Kh3 29.Rc4++- 28.Rh2± 20.Rxg6+- 17...b5 18.Nd5± ∆e6 19.fxg4 Nxg4 20.Rxg4 exd5 21.Nf5+- The positional exchange sacrifice is not sufficient here: 17...Bf6 18.Bxf8 Kxf8 18...Qxf8 19.Nd5 Bg7 20.fxg4 Bxg4 21.Qg5 19.fxg4 Bxg4 20.Nd5 An important resource. With the queen on a5 (as in Karjakin-Radjabov, see 16...Qa5) White can't play this. Bg7 21.Ne3 Bd7 22.Nef5 Or 17...Bh8 18.fxg4 Bxg4 19.Bxf8 Qxf8 19...Kxf8 20.Qf2± 20.Rh4 18.Bxg7 Kxg7 19.f4 Again White had an interesting alternative: 19.fxg4 after which Black needs to play extremely precisely: Nxg4 19...Bxg4? 20.Rxh5 gxh5 20...Bxh5 21.Nf5++- 21.Nf5+ Kf6 22.Qh6+ Ng6 23.Nh4+- 20.Nd5 20.Nf5+ looks less attractive to me Rxf5!? 20...Bxf5 21.exf5 Ngf6 22.fxg6 fxg6 23.Qg2 Nf4 24.Qxb7∞ 21.exf5 Bxf5∞ 20...Rh8 21.Nf5+ Bxf5 21...gxf5? 22.Qg5++- 22.exf5 Nhf6 23.Rxh8 Qxh8 24.fxg6 fxg6 Strangely enough, Black seems to keep the balance here: 25.Nf4 After 25.Nxe7 Re5 26.Qxd6 a possible variation is Qf8 27.Be6 Ne4 28.Qd7 Nc5 29.Nxg6+ Kxg6 30.Rxg4+ Kf6 31.Rf4+ Kg5 with a draw due to the back rank weakness. 25...Re5 26.Ne6+ Kg8 and the analysis shows that White has little better than repeating moves. However, for the Black side to evaluate correctly such a position and find all this over the board is far from easy. 27.Nf4+ Kg7 28.Ne6+ Kg8= With the king on g7 the move 19.Rh4? is just bad, since after Nxf3 or 19...e6 20.Nxf3 gxf3 pawn g6 is protected (unlike in the variation 17...Qa5 18.Rh4). 19...Nc4 20.Bxc4 Rxc4 21.f5 e5! 21...Rh8 offers White nice compensation for the pawn: 22.Rxg4 e5 22...Nf6 23.Rgh4± 22...Qb6 23.Nce2± 23.fxe6 Bxe6 23...fxe6 24.Rhg1 Rh6 25.e5!+- 24.Nxe6+ fxe6 25.Qg2 25.Rhg1 Rh6 26.Qg2 Qe8 and Black holds somehow 25...Rh6 25...Qf6? 26.e5+- 26.Ne2 22.Nde2 Black is doing fine after 22.fxe6 fxe6 23.Nde2 23.Rxg4? e5 24.Nf5+ 24.Rxh5 Rf1+ 25.Nd1 Bxg4 26.Qh6+ Kf7-+ 24...Bxf5 25.Rxh5 Bxg4 26.Qh6+ Kf7 27.Qh7+ Ke8 28.Qxg6+ Kd7 29.Qxg4+ Kc6 and the king successfully escapes 23...e5 24.Qxd6 Qe8 with at least equal play 22...Rh8 Again the only move to keep the position alive. Black must cover the h6-square in order to retreat the knight after the coming Rxg4. 23.b3 Before taking on g4 White must drive his opponent's rook away from the fourth rank. After the immediate 23.Rxg4 Black exploitss the pin on the e-pawn: Bxf5 23.Qxd6 leads to a good endgame for Black: Bc6 24.Qxe5+ Qf6 25.Qxf6+ Nxf6 26.Rxh8 Kxh8 27.e5 Ne4 23...Rc6? Up till now Carlsen has defended very well, but now he makes a mistake, which is enough to lose such dangerous positions. The only move was 23...Rc8! Protecting once again square h8 was more important than defending pawn d6. 24.Rxg4 24.fxg6 fxg6 25.Qxd6 Qe8∞ 24...Nf6 25.Rgg1 After 25.Rxh8 Qxh8 26.Rg1 Black can already consider Rc6 since the plan Ng3 and Rh1 is no longer dangerous due to the possibility to activate the queen: 27.Ng3 27.Qe1 Qh5 28.Rh1 Qg5 27...Qh6∞ 25...Qe7 Black rooks are connected and although White has compensation for the pawn thanks to the pressure on the open files, the position remains balanced: 26.Ng3 Rxh1 27.Rxh1 Rh8∞ Thus we can conclude that with the correct 23...Rc8 Black would have kept a playable position. 24.Rxg4 White's main idea is to pin the knight (Rgh4), then continue Nd5, after which Black will find himself almost in zugzwang. Therefore Black must retreat the knight, but then White takes control over the h-file... Nf6 25.Rgg1!± /+- Suddenly it turns out that Black cannot defend against Ng3, followed by Rxh8 and Rh1, creating a decisive attack on the h-file. 25.Rgh4?? runs into Nxe4!-+ 25...Rxh1 26.Rxh1 Ng4 A nice way to protect the h6-square, but the knight on g4 is not stable and therefore it does not solve Black's defensive task. 26...Nh5 27.Nd5+- 27.Ng3 Kg8 28.Nd5 Complete domination. Black's position is hopeless. Rc5 29.Ne3 Topalov goes for a simple position, rightly assessing it as clearly better for White. Variations like 29.Qg2 Rxd5 30.fxg6 also favor White, but 29.Ne3 is more practical. 30.Qh3? Rd1+ 31.Rxd1 Nf2 After 30.exd5 Bxf5 31.Nxf5 gxf5 Black keeps possibilities for counterplay 29...Nxe3 29...Qg5 30.Qxd6+- 30.Qxe3 Qf6 31.Qh6 Qg7 32.Qg5 f6 33.Qd2 Black cannot protect his weaknesses on the entire board. Rc6 After 33...g5 the simple 34.Qxd6 or 34.Nh5 Qe7 35.Qh2 and wins due to the threat Nf4, coming with the knight either to g6 or e6. 34...Rc6 35.Qd5+± 34.Kb2?! Completely unnecessary. 34.Qa5 wins at once: b6 34...Rc8 35.Qd5+ Kf8 36.fxg6+- 35.Qxa6 Rc8 35...gxf5 36.Qa8+ Kf7 37.Nxf5+- 36.Qb7 gxf5 37.Qd5+ Kf8 38.Qxd6++- 34...gxf5 Carlsen misses the opportunity 34...Be8! 35.fxg6 Now after 35.Qa5 Black has Qc7 36.Qd5+ Bf7 35...Bxg6 and White has no direct win. 35.Qa5 Qe7 35...b6 36.Qd5+ Kf8 37.Nxf5± 36.Qd5+ Be6 37.Qd1! Due to the unfortunate position of the king on b2 37.Nxf5 allows Black a counter-sacrifice Rxc2+! and White's advantage is questionable after 37...Bxd5 38.Nxe7+ Kf8 39.Nxd5+- 38.Ka1 38.Kxc2?? Qc7+ 39.Kb2 Bxd5-+ 38...Qd7 39.Qd3 Bxf5! 39...Rg2 40.Qh3+- 40.Qxc2 40.exf5 Rc7!= 40...Bg6∞ 37...Qg7 38.exf5 Bf7 38...Qxg3 39.Rg1+- 39.Ne4 Kf8 40.Nxd6 Ke7 More stubborn is 40...Bg8 After 41.Ne4 the black king is too exposed. 41.Nxb7 The rest is simple - White has a material advantage and a winning attack. Qg8 42.Qd2 42.Rh7! ∆Qxh7 43.Qd8# 42...Rb6 43.Rd1 Qc8 44.Nd6 The technical decision. 44.Nd8 Qc7 45.Nxf7 Kxf7 46.Qd5+ Kf8 47.Rg1+- 44...Qd7 45.Nxf7 Qxd2 46.Rxd2 Kxf7 47.c4 Ke7 48.Kc3 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Topalov,V2777Carlsen,M27751–02008B78Grand Slam Final 1st8

***

In the following example, Jobava showed an impressive ability to find a clear route out of a complicated endgame:

Jobava-Tregubov, Ohrid 2001, White to move:

Surely, White is better. However, I can imagine many scenarios how a club player would be able to spoil this position. For example, many rook endgames are actually drawn, because the passed d-pawn is too close to the black king.

However, Jobava was able to calculate a winning line. He decided to force matters:

33.Rxa5! Rxa5 34.d7 Rd8 35.Nc6 Raa8 The only move. However, now White enjoys full domination. 36.Ke2 Kf6 37.Rd6+ Kg7 38.Nxd8! An important subtlety. After the automatic 38.Ke3? Black draws with 38…Ra6!, pinning the rook. 38...Rxd8 39.Ke3 Kf8 40.Ke4 Ke7 41.Ke5

I am sure that it did not take Jobava more than ten minutes to calculate the sequence from 33.Rxa5 to the position diagrammed above. It is not complicated to calculate far provided that your opponent has to play forced moves all the time.

Now Black is in a zugzwang. Any pawn move would just weaken his kingside. Therefore, Tregubov played:

41…Rxd7, but after 42.Rxd7+ Kxd7 43.Kf6 Ke8 44.Kg7 White wins easily in a trivial pawn endgame.

To see a hidden simple pawn endgame in the complicated position before 33.Rxa5, that is a sign of an exceptional technical player! Tregubov got no chance to save himself.

Here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Solozhenkin Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.cxb5 a6 5.b6 e6 This is becoming practically Black's most popular weapon against the 5.b6 system. Black doesn't want to give White a () in a semi-closed position, instead he strives for active piece play even for the price of a slightly compromised P-structure (in the position after 12 moves). 6.Nc3 Nxd5 7.Nxd5 exd5 8.Qxd5 Nc6 9.Nf3 Rb8 10.e4 10.Bd2 Be7 11.Bc3 0-0 12.e4 Rxb6 13.Bc4 d6 14.0-0 Bf6 15.Rad1 Be6 16.Qd3 Nb4 16...Bxc3 17.bxc3 Bxc4 18.Qxc4 Qf6 17.Qe2 Nxa2? 18.Bxa2 Bxa2 19.Ba5 Rxb2 20.Qxb2 Bxb2 21.Bxd8 Rxd8 22.Rd2 Rb8 23.Rxd6 h6 24.Rfd1± Georgiev,K-Vaisser,A/EU-ch plof Ohrid/2001/ 10...Be7 11.Bc4 0-0 12.0-0 12.Bd2 Rxb6 13.0-0 d6!? Accepting the sacrifice is risky: 13...Rxb2 14.Bc3 Rb6 15.Rad1 d6 16.Qh5 Bf6 16...Be6 17.Bxe6 fxe6 18.Qg4± 16...Qe8!?∞ 17.e5 g6 18.Qh6 Bg7 19.Qe3 Re8 20.Qf4 Be6 21.Rxd6 Qb8 22.Bxe6 fxe6 23.Ng5± Nd8 24.Rdd1 Bh6? 25.Rxd8! 1-0,Thorfinnsson,B-Zueger,B/EU-ch Ohrid/2001/ 14.Qh5 Be6 15.Bd5 Bf6 16.Bc3 Qe7 17.Rad1 Nd4! 18.Nxd4 cxd4 19.Bxd4 Bxd4 20.Rxd4 Rxb2 21.a3 Qa7 22.Rd3 h6 23.h3 Kh7 24.Qf3 Kg8= 1/2,Edzgveradze,N-Milov,L/ Oberwart op/1994/ 12...Rxb6 13.b3 This move shouldn't give White any advantage, but practice shows Black has <=> even after other continuations: 13.Qh5 d6 14.Ng5 14.Rd1 Be6 15.Bxe6 fxe6 16.Qg4 Qc8 17.Bd2 e5 18.Qxc8 Rxc8 19.Bc3 Nd4 20.Nd2 20.Bxd4 exd4 21.b3 a5 22.Rac1 Ra8 23.e5 d5 24.Ne1 a4 25.Nd3 axb3 26.axb3 Ra5 27.Nf4 Knaak,R-Hertneck,G/Baden-Baden/ 1992/ 20...c4 21.Rab1 Kf7 22.g3 Ne2+ 23.Kf1 Nxc3 24.bxc3 Bd8 25.Ke2 Ke6 26.Nf1 Rcb8 27.Rxb6 Rxb6 28.Ne3 Rb2+ 29.Rd2 Rxd2+ 30.Kxd2 Bg5= Vyzmanavin,A-Khalifman,A/Novosibirsk/1995/ 14.b3 Be6 15.Ng5 Bxg5 16.Bxg5 Qd7 17.Bd3 f5 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.Rad1 Ne5 20.Bxf5 Qxf5 21.f4 Ryskin, A-Sermek,D/Ljubljana op/1994/ Nf7 14...Bxg5 15.Bxg5 Qe8 16.Bf4 Be6 17.Bd3 c4 18.Bb1 Ne5 19.Qd1 Qb8 20.Bd2 Rxb2 21.Bc3 Rb5 22.f4 Nc6 23.f5 Bd7 24.Qd2 f6 25.a4 Rb7 26.Rd1 Rc8= Milanovic,D-Vuckovic,B/Belgrade/2001/ 13.Qd3 Nb4 14.Qe2 Bb7 15.Bd2 Bf6 16.a3 Nc6 17.Bc3 Bxc3 18.bxc3 Na5 19.Ba2 Qe7 20.Rfe1 Re8 21.Qe3 h6 22.Rad1 Rb2 23.Bd5 Bxd5 24.Rxd5 Nc4 Knaak,R-Zimmer,R/Bundesliga 9293/1993/ 13.Bf4 d6 14.Qd2 14.b3!? -13.b3 d6 14...Be6 15.Bd5 Bxd5 16.exd5 Na7 17.b3 Nb5 18.Qd3 Bf6 19.Rac1 a5 20.Nd2 Nc7 21.Nc4 Ra6 22.Qg3 Bh4 23.Qg4 f5 24.Qf3 Bg5 25.Bxg5 Qxg5 26.a4 f4 27.Rcd1 Rf5∞ Bajarany,I-Hertneck,G/Berlin/1997/ 13...d6 Even more energetic and convincing is 13...Na5! 14.Bf4 14.Be2?! Bb7 15.Qd2 Re6 16.e5 d6 17.exd6 Bxd6 18.Ng5 Rg6 19.Bd3 f5 20.f4 Dokhoian,Y-Hertneck,G/Bundesliga 9293/1992/ h6! 21.Nf3 Bxf4 14...Bb7 15.Qd3 Nxc4 16.bxc4 Re6 17.Nd2 Bc6 18.f3 Bg5 19.Bd6 Be7 20.Bg3 Bh4 21.Rab1 21.Bd6= 21...Bxg3 22.hxg3 Qg5 23.Kf2 f5 Avrukh,B-Berg,K/ Groningen/1993/ 14.Bf4 Be6 15.Qd3 Bxc4 15...Bf6 16.Rad1 Nd4 17.Nxd4 17.Nd2!? Bg5 18.Bxg5 Qxg5 19.f4 17...Bxd4 18.Be3 Bxe3 19.Qxe3 Bxc4 20.bxc4 Qf6 21.Rd5 Re8 22.Rfd1 g6 23.h3 Kg7 24.f4 Qb2 25.R5d2 Qf6 26.Rd5 Qb2 27.R5d2= 1/2,Khmelniker,I-Evdokimov,A/WCh U14 Oropesa/1999/ 15...Nb4 16.Qd2 d5 17.exd5 Nxd5 18.Rfd1 Nxf4 19.Qxf4 Rd6 20.Rxd6 Bxd6 21.Qe4 Bxc4 22.Qxc4 Qb6 23.Rd1 h6 24.g3 Re8 25.Kg2 Vasquez,R-Churin,L/Mar del Plata/1996/ 16.Qxc4 Bf6 16...Rb4 (Solozhenkin) allows White to keep a slight advantage: 17.Qxa6 Rxe4 18.Qxc6 Rxf4 19.Rfe1 Rb4 19...d5 Solozhenkin 20.Re5 d4 21.Rae1 Rf6 22.Qb5 Bd6 23.Re8 Qc7 24.h3 17.Rad1 Nd4 18.Nd2!? White has higher ambitions than the sedate 18.Nxd4 Bxd4 19.Rfe1 Re8 20.Qd5 Qf6 21.Be3 Bc3 /\Qe6= 18...Bg5 18...Qa8!? 19.Rfe1 Rb4 18...Nb5!? (Solozhenkin) was interesting as a try to get counterplay. For example, 19.Rc1 Bb2 20.Rce1 Qf6 19.Bxg5 Qxg5 20.Rfe1 h6 It is not a serious mistake, but not a perfect move. Probably Black didn't expect the next move of White otherwise he would play 20...Re8 (Solozhenkin) and if 21.Qd5 than 21.Qd3!? Solozhenkin Re6!? 21...Qxd5 22.exd5 Rbb8 23.Nc4 Rxe1+ 24.Rxe1 Kf8= 21.Qd5 21.Qd3!? /\Nf3+/=><d6 Re8 22.Nf3 22.Nc4 Solozhenkin Rc6= 22...Nxf3+ 23.Qxf3 Re6 21...Qxd5 22.exd5 a5?! Only this mistake allows White to develop an initiative. Modest and better was 22...Rb7 23.Nc4 Rd8 24.Re4 24.Re3 Solozhenkin Kf8 25.Rde1 Rbd7 25...Nc2?? Solozhenkin 26.Re8+ Black's position looks like quite solid. 24...Kf8 24...f5!? 25.Re3 f4 25.Rde1 Rbd7 /\f5,Re7= and White can't retain control of the <->e, let alone penetrate into Black's camp as in the game. 25...f5? 26.Re8+! Rxe8 27.Rxe8+ Kxe8 28.Nxd6+± 23.Re7! a4 24.Nc4 Rb4 24...Ra6 25.b4± Did Black overlook this resource? 25.Nxd6 axb3 26.axb3 Nxb3? Misplacing the N for a single move is practically fatal. Solozhenkin: 'It seems that only this serious mistake was the reason of Black's loss.' 26...Rxb3 /\ 27.Nb7 27.Rc7 Rd8= 27...c4 28.Kf1 c3! 29.Rxd4 c2 29...Rc8? 30.d6 c2 31.d7 c1Q+ 32.Re1+- 30.Rc4 Rb1+ 31.Ke2 c1Q 32.Rxc1 Rxc1 33.d6 26...Rd8! Solozhenkin forces White to exchange the active e7-rook: 27.Re8+ 27.Nxf7 Solozhenkin Rxd5= 27...Rxe8 28.Nxe8 Rxb3 and there is no 29.d6? because of Rb8 27.Kf1 Rbb8 27...c4 28.Rc7± 27...Rd4 Solozhenkin 28.Rxd4 Nxd4 29.Nb7 c4 30.Rc7 Ra8 31.g3± 27...Nd4 Solozhenkin 28.Nb7± 28.Rc7± Solozhenkin: 'The difference between the two knights is obvious now and that determins White's advantage.' Na5 28...Rb4!? 29.Nf5 g6 30.Ne7+ Kg7 31.Nc6± 29.Nf5 '!' Solozhenkin. This is much stronger than 29.Rxc5 Solozhenkin Nb7 30.Nxb7 Rxb7 exchanging knights. 29...g6 30.Ne7+ Kg7 31.d6 31.Rxc5± /+- 31...Rfe8 32.Rxc5 Ra8 32...Nb7 33.Rb5! /\Nc6+- Nxd6 34.Rxb8 Rxb8 35.Rxd6+- 33.Rxa5!+- A clean technical solution, White transposes into a won P_|_. Rxa5 34.d7 Rd8 35.Nc6 Raa8 36.Ke2 Kf6 36...f5 37.Ke3 Kf7 38.Rd6+- 37.Rd6+ Kg7 38.Nxd8 38.Ke3? Ra6 /\Rc6= 38...Rxd8 39.Ke3 Kf8 40.Ke4 Ke7 41.Ke5 Rxd7 41...f6+ 42.Rxf6 Rxd7 43.Rxg6+- 41...h5 42.f4+- 42.Rxd7+ Kxd7 43.Kf6 Ke8 44.Kg7 Not the only move, an alternative was 44.g4 Kf8 45.f4 Kg8 46.Ke7 Kg7 47.f5+- 44...h5 45.Kf6 Kf8 45...h4 46.h3+- /\Kg5-h4 46.h4 Kg8 47.f4 Kf8 48.f5 gxf5 49.Kxf5 Ke7 50.Kg5 Ke6 51.Kxh5 Kf5 52.g3 52.g3 Kf6 52...f6 53.g4+ Kf4 54.g5+- 53.Kh6+- /\Kg7 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Jobava,B2543Tregubov,P26281–02001A57EU-ch 2nd3

***

A winning position is much better manageable if your opponent has zero counterplay. Therefore, the ability to rob your opponent of active possibilities therefore is the key skill of a good technique.

In the following example, Aronian untied the Gordian knot in a very elegant manner:

Aronian-Nakamura, Moscow 2012, White to move:

White is an exchange up, but Black has significant counterplay. Both …g5-g4 and …Be6-g4 are unpleasant threats. Also, the c6-knight eyes the central d4-square. Therefore, Aronian's task to convert his material advantage into a full point does not seem to be easy at all.

However, the Armenian managed to make the life simple for himself. He played the beautiful 25.Rxc6! bxc6 26.Qa1!, returning the exchange but conquering the important e5-pawn. With the fall of this pawn Nakamura's centre will collapse.

White won without any troubles.

Here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 d5 5.cxd5 Nxd5 6.Bg2 Nb6 7.0-0 Be7 8.d3 0-0 9.Be3!? Aronian refrains from the ambitious plan based on an early advance of the b-pawn (with or without d2-d3 in between), which has been long considered White's main chance for an advantage. Instead, he chooses a setup that is typical for the Classical Dragon. Well, having an extra tempo with reversed colours in what is considered a safe line for Black cannot hurt. f5 9...Be6 is more popular. Here is an example at a high level from recentt years; true, it was played in a rapid game. 10.Rc1 One of the main problems when playing lines with reversed colours is that what is excellent for Black does not always suit White. For instance, the freeing break 10.d4 leads to easy equality, but nothing more than that. exd4 11.Nxd4 Nxd4 12.Qxd4 Qxd4 1/2 Morovic Fernandez,I (2540)-Sokolov,A (2605)/Las Palmas 1989/EXT 1997 10...f6 11.a3 Nd4 12.Ne4 Bb3 13.Qd2 Nxf3+ 14.Bxf3 Bd5 15.Qc2 c6 16.Nd2 Kh8 17.Rfd1 f5 18.b4 Black somehow did not manage to neutralise White's queenside play and his kingside attack is not easy to develop. Bg5 19.Bxg5 Qxg5 20.a4 Qe7 21.a5 Bxf3 22.Nxf3 e4 23.dxe4 fxe4 24.Nd2 e3 25.axb6 exd2 26.Rxd2 axb6 27.Rd4 Ivanchuk,V (2779)-Kramnik,V (2759)/Nice 2009/ CBM 129 Extra (1/2, 65) 10.Rc1 Kh8 It is interesting that Nakamura delays the development of his c8-bishop, probably fearing the standard manoeuvre Nc3-a4-c5. Aronian had faced 10...Be6 a ve-e-ery long time ago: 11.a3 f4 This hands over the e4-square too easily. 11...Bf6 spares White any worries about ...f5-f4, allowing 12.Nd2 with some lasting queenside pressure: Rb8 13.Bc5 Re8 14.b4 Qd7 15.Nb3 Szabo,L-Kluger,G/Budapest 1954/ MCD (1-0, 46) 12.Bd2 g5?! 13.Ne4 Nd7 14.Rxc6! This is a well-known trick from the Classical Dragon. bxc6 15.Bc3 Aronian,L (2455)-Del Rio Angelis,S (2395)/Linares 1998/CBM 062 ext (1-0, 34) 11.a3 Bf6 As mentioned above, 11...Be6 can be met with 12.Na4 , see for instance Ibragimov,I (2540)-Schwartzman,G (2455)/Odorheiu Secuiesc 1993/CBM 036/[Belov] (1-0, 51) 12.Bc5 Immediately taking the available space. With the b7-pawn defended (...Be6 not played yet) Szabo's manoeuvre 12.Nd2 is less effective because of Nd4 followed by ...c6. 12...Re8 13.b4 Be6 Now that there is no danger of Na4-c5, Black finally develops his bishop. Still, White has made some significant progress in the meanwhile. 14.Re1!?N A hyper-flexible, but maybe too slow move. 14.Nd2 worked out well in the only previous game with this position: Nd5?! Inviting White to carry out a favourable operation in the centre. 14...a6!? 15.Nxd5 Bxd5 16.e4 fxe4 17.Nxe4 With excellent piece play for White in Onischuk,A (2495) -Fogarasi,T (2440)/Budapest 1993/CBM 037 ext (1-0, 75) If Aronian wanted to play e2-e4 anyway, I believe that 14.e4 would have been a more restrictive move order. 14...Qd7 Black could have tried 14...Nd7 when after 15.e4 Nxc5 16.bxc5 the queenside structural modifications do not favour White. 15.e4 Everything returns to normal now. White has a very pleasant position. a6 Black cannot prevent White from installing his queen's knight on e4. 15...f4?! 16.gxf4 exf4 17.d4± leaves White with a massive centre. 15...g6?! does not really keep the control over e4, since after 16.exf5 gxf5?! 17.b5 White wins a pawn. 16.Bh3?! This is asking too much. After the simple 16.exf5 Bxf5 17.Ne4 White has a great position. For instance, the threat against the d3-pawn created with Rad8 can be parried with 18.Nfg5 , in view of the possible fork on f7. 16...g6!= Now White can forget about the e4-square, while the weaknesses induced by Black's last move are not too relevant. 16...fxe4 17.Bxe6 Qxe6 18.Nxe4 Still, I prefer the position from the previous comment, with the bishops on the board. 16...Nd4 17.Bxd4 exd4 18.Ne2 fxe4 19.Bxe6 Rxe6 19...Qxe6 20.dxe4 Qxe4 21.Nf4 Qf5 22.Rxc7 20.Nf4 Ree8 21.dxe4 In fact, the centralising 16...Rad8 would have been entirely possible. 17.exf5 Bxf5 18.Bxf5 Qxf5 19.Ne4 Nd5 For once, Black's activity compensates for the strong e4-knight. 17.Be3 Qg7 18.Ng5 Played apparently without a clear plan. 18.Qc2!? 18...Bg8 19.Nf3 The knight has nothing to do on g5 and is exposed to ...f5-f4. Besides, the d4-square is crying for defence. f4!? Black does not care for a repetition of moves already. 20.Bxb6 cxb6 21.Nd5 g5? 21...Rad8 22.Nxb6 h5 After the careless 22...g5?! 23.Bg4! Black cannot unblock his kingside easily. 22.Bd7! What a shock! Black is in trouble already. Re6!? Desperation. 22...Red8 23.Bxc6 bxc6 24.Rxc6 I find this best. The greedy 24.Nxb6 Ra7 25.Rxc6 g4 offers Black some play for the pawns. 24...Bxd5 25.exd5 Rxd5 26.Qc2 White's pieces are more active and his king is safer. 23.Bxe6 Bxe6 24.Nxf6 Qxf6 25.Rxc6!? A technical decision, in the spirit of another great Armenian player, Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian. bxc6 26.Qa1+- White wins the central pawn and, inevitably, the game. a5 27.Qxe5 Qxe5 28.Nxe5 axb4 29.axb4 c5 30.bxc5 bxc5 31.gxf4 gxf4 32.Kg2 Ra3 33.Kf3 c4 34.Kxf4 cxd3 35.Rd1 Ra2 36.Nxd3 Bc4 37.f3 Rxh2 38.Ne5 Ba2 39.Rd7 Rh6 40.Nf7+ Bxf7 41.Rxf7 Kg8 42.Rf5 Rh1 43.e5 h5 44.Rg5+ Kf8 45.Kf5 h4 46.Rh5 Kg7 47.f4 h3 48.Ke6 Kg6 49.Rg5+ Kh6 50.Kf5 Rh2 51.Rg8 Rh1 52.e6 h2 53.Rg2 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Aronian,L2825Nakamura,H27751–02012A29Moscow Tal Memorial 7th1

***

When a player is able to find simple solutions to complex problems, he might benefit from it at all stages of the game, not only in won positions.

Here is an example of how beneficial this skill might be even at the very beginning of a game:

Short-Williams, West Broomwich 2003, White to move:

In this closed Sicilian position, Williams played …h7-h5 at a very early stage, threatening to follow up unpleasantly with …h5-h4. I had shown this position to several pupils, all of them rated well over 2000, and many of them struggled to find the correct antidote.

For example, 8.Bg5 does not solve anything, Black can still play 8…h4, as 9.Bxh4? loses a piece to 9…Bxh3 10.Bxh3 g5.

However, for Short this was a piece of cake. He understood that all he needs is to be able to answer …h5-h4 with g3-g4. After that Black's counterplay evaporates. Therefore, he played 8.Nd5 to be prepared to exchange the f6-knight. Now 8…h4 runs into 9.Nxf6+ Bxf6 10.g4. Williams answered 8…Ne5, attacking the g4-square one more time. However, Short responded calmly 9.f3!.

And that is the end of the story of the Black's attack along the h-file. There is no follow-up. The h5-h4 push will be always answered with g3-g4.

Admittedly, 9.f3 is not the most beautiful move ever played. But it serves its purpose, solving the problem with Black's activity on the kingside in a very efficient and effective manner. Short won convincingly in 28 moves.

Here's the complete game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 d6 6.Nh3 h5 7.0-0 Nf6 8.Nd5 Ne5 9.f3 h4 10.g4 Be6 11.Ndf4 Bd7 12.c3 Nc6 13.Rb1 e5 14.Nd5 Nxd5 15.exd5 Ne7 16.f4 Qc8 17.Nf2 f5 18.fxe5 dxe5 19.d6 Nc6 20.Qb3 Be6 21.Qb5 0-0 22.Bg5 e4 23.Qxc5 b6 24.Qe3 Ne5 25.Bxh4 Qd7 26.Bg3 Qxd6 27.gxf5 gxf5 28.dxe4 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Short,N2686Williams,S23751–02003B25BCF-chT 0203 (4NCL)9.2

***

When I was at my first Olympiad, 15-years old, I watched the games of all these grandmasters and thought: "I wish I could perceive the thoughts of these geniuses. Surely, they are thinking in a very complicated and sophisticated way!" Today, being a GM myself, I know the truth. Many of these professionals in fact weren’t thinking about complicated details. Instead, they were pondering: "What is the simplest way to win this?"

Simple is safe. To be simple means to be successful. Therefore, when you see a simple solution, go for it!

It is no shame to win effortlessly. On the contrary: the simpler you win today, the more energy you are going to spare for tomorrow.

Let us learn together how to find the best spot for the queen in the early middlegame, how to navigate this piece around the board, how to time the queen attack, how to decide whether to exchange it or not, and much more!

Links


Jan Markos is a Slovakian chess author, trainer, and grandmaster. His book Under the Surface was the English Chess Federation´s 2018 Book of the Year. His last book, The Secret Ingredient, co-authored with David Navara, focuses on the practical aspects of play, e.g. time-management over the board, how to prepare against a specific opponent, or how to use chess engines during the training process. Markos was the U16 European Champion twenty years ago. At present he helps his pupils from several countries to achieve similar successes. Apart from focusing on the royal game, he is also the author of several non-chess books, focused on critical thinking, moral dilemmas, and phenomenology.

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.