The Winning Academy 18: Magnus Carlsen's diagonals

by Jan Markos
2/20/2023 – In chess calculation, width is more important than depth. Virtually every decent player can calculate a forced line till the very end. However, only few can sense all the flavours of the position, find all the hidden ideas. To see the exceptions where everybody else only sees the rules. To find something unusual while all the others follow well-known patterns. In this article, Jan Markos shows you how Magnus Carlsen is able to come up with unexpected solutions in situations where an average club player would be totally confused. | Photo: Lennart Ootes, Archive

Let our authors show you how Carlsen tailored his openings to be able to outplay his opponents strategically in the middlegame or to obtain an enduring advantage into the endgame.

The Norwegian genius does calculate further. But in addition to that he is also able to see the position in its richness and find moves that are hidden to those with a more rigid approach to the position.

Funnily enough, in all the following examples it seems that central files are going to play the crucial role in the subsequent fight. However, we will soon find out that in fact not files, but diagonals will be truly important.

Therefore, we might half-jokingly say: "Carlsen sees diagonals where all the others only see files."

***

In the first example, a seemingly boring early middlegame has arisen:

Carlsen-Jakovenko, Nanjing 2009, White to move:

 

In this position without bishops, Black's c6-weakness does not play any major role. White's only advantage therefore lies in his small lead in development. Carlsen therefore needs to act fast. But how? Of course, 13.e4 seems to be very natural. But what to do after 13… dxe4 (Jakovenko played 13…0-0 and was significantly worse after 14.e5) 14.Nxe4 Qd5?

 

I use the position before 13.e4 frequently in my coaching sessions, and almost all my pupils get stuck in their calculations at his point. 15.Nc3 Qd6 seems to get White nowhere. 15.Re1 0-0 is also OK for Black.

However, Carlsen was able to discover the surprising 15.Qa3!. Unexpectedly, the a3-f8 diagonal plays the decisive role. White threatens to deliver a check on d6, and 15…0-0 loses material after 16.Nc3! (16.Qxe7?? Rfe8) Qe6 17.Re1.

Here's the complete game:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Be7 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Bf4 c6 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.Bxd6 Qxd6 8.e3 Ne7 A detailed review of this line is given in annotations to Onischuk - Kovacs in this issue. 9.Bd3 b6 10.Nf3 Ba6 11.0-0 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 12...0-0 13.e4 dxe4 14.Nxe4 Qd5 13.e4!       This is now extremely effective. 0-0 The point is that after 13...dxe4 14.Nxe4 Qd5 (or elswhere) 14...Qe6 15.Qa3 0-0? 16.Nfg5+- 15.Qa3! Black will not be able to castle! Therefore Dmitry Jakovenko decides to let the e4-pawn move forward. 14.e5 White now has an edge due to his space advantage. Qe6 15.Rae1 Rfe8 15...f6!? 16.Nh4! Ng6 16...f5!? It would take White a lot of time to prepare g2-g4. 17.Nxg6 Qxg6 18.Qd2 Nf8 18...f5 19.f4 Qf5? 19...f5 was possible here, too. Instead, Black blocks White's f-pawn with his queen, which proves ineffective. 20.Nd1 f6 21.Ne3 Qd7 22.Qd3 fxe5 Black finds a way to parry White's threat but White now obtains a crushing pawn avalanche. One of Philidor's model games had a similar course. 23.dxe5 Ne6 24.f5 Nc5 25.Qd4 Ne4 Desperation, rather than a blunder. White now wins a pawn and then converts his material advantage. 26.Nxd5!       Qxd5 26...cxd5 27.Rxe4+- 27.Qxe4 Rad8 28.e6 28.f6!? 28...Qxe4 29.Rxe4 Rd6 29...Rd2 30.b4! ≤30.g4 Rxb2 31.g5 Rb5 32.h4 Kf8 33.f6 Rd5 30...Rxa2 31.Rc1 Rc8 32.Rec4+- 30.g4 Kf8 31.g5 Ke7 32.Kg2 Rd5 33.Kg3 Kd6 34.h4 c5 35.f6 gxf6 36.gxf6 Rd3+ 37.Kh2 Rd2+ 38.Kh1 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2772Jakovenko,D27421–02009D31Nanjing Pearl Spring 2nd10

 

***

In the following diagram, White's positional advantage is undisputable. But how to convert it in the safest and most convincing way?

Carlsen-Anand, Moscow 2013, White to move:

 

Carlsen's pieces are harmoniously placed, whereas their black counterparts are occupying strange and modest positions. The a8-rook is undeveloped, the c7-rook is insufficiently protected, the e6-bishop is also vulnerable. Therefore, the position seems to be ripe for direct action. But how precisely should White break's Black's defences?

22.d5! is logical enough. And after 22…cxd5 it makes a lot of sense to exchange the queens, as Black has to retake with the rook: 23.Qxd7 Rxd7. But what to do next? Again, Carlsen has spotted a hidden diagonal. He first exchanged the black bishop 24.Nxe6 fxe6 and afterwards crowned his effort with an unexpected move:

 

I am sure that you can easily see that 25.Bh3! is the best move in the diagram position. However, Carlsen had to understand this before he played 22.d5.

Now Anand's position collapses, the e6-pawn is simply too weak. He tried 25…Kh8, but after 26.e5 Ng8 27.Bxe6 Rd8 28.Rc7 White was simply dominating the board.

Here's the complete game:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 0-0 5.Nge2 d5 6.a3 Be7 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Bd2 Nd7 9.g3 b6 Alternatives seen in practice: 9...N7f6 9...N5f6 9...N5b6 9...Nxc3 10.Nxd5 exd5 11.Bg2 Bb7 The bishop will be passive here. 11...Nf6 12.0-0 Bf5 This is a better square for the bishop. 12...Bb7 13.Bb4 was probably the best of all 13.Qc2 Bd6 13...a5!? 14.Bb4 a5 15.Bxd6 Qxd6 16.Rac1 c6 17.Rfd1 Rac8 18.Nc3 g6 1/2 (25) Bischoff,K (2561)-Tischbierek,R (2507) Austria 2004 19.Qb3 13.Rc1 Qd7 13...a5 again was appropriate 14.Qc2 Bd6 15.Bb4 Bxb4 16.axb4 c6 17.Nf4 a6 18.Qc3 Qd6 19.f3 Rfe8 20.Rfe1 Rad8 21.Rcd1 Nd7 22.e4 0-1 (44) Janssen,R (2484)-Tiviakov,S (2601) Dieren 2004 12...Ne4 13.Rc1 Bb7 13...Bf5!? 14.Qc2 Rc8 15.Rfd1 Bd6 16.Bb4!? Qf6 17.Nc3 Nxc3 18.Qxc3 c6 19.Bxd6 Qxd6 20.b4 Rc7 21.a4 Bc8 22.a5 Ba6 23.Ra1 1-0 (38) Ponomariov,R (2734)-Kramnik,V (2807) Wijk aan Zee 2003 CBM 093 [Ftacnik,L] 13.Bb4 13.Nf4 Qd7 14.Qb3 Rfd8 15.Rac1 Rac8 16.Rfd1 a5 17.Be1 a4 18.Qc3 c6 19.Qd2 Bd6 20.Qe2 Bxf4 21.exf4 Bh3= 1/2 (26) Grigoriants,S (2594)-Wells,P (2499) Dresden 2007 13...a5 14.Bxe7 Qxe7 15.Rc1 h6 16.Nc3 Qd7 17.Re1 Rfe8 18.Qb3 Rad8 19.Qb5 Qd6 20.Qb3 Qd7 21.Qb5 Qd6 22.Qe2 Qd7 23.Qb5 1/2 (23) Martinovic,S (2515)-Papp,G (2534) Chur 2010 12.Bb4!       White decides to get rid of his passive bishop at once, not giving Black a chance to prevent this exchange by means of ...a7-a5. 12.0-0 Re8 12...a5!? 13.Qc2 Nf6 13.Qc2 Bd6 14.Rac1 Qe7 15.Nc3 Nf6 16.Nb5 c6 17.Nxd6 Qxd6 18.f3 Nd7 19.Rfe1 c5 20.Bc3 1-0 (45) Milov,V (2632)-Cheparinov,I (2550) Dos Hermanas 2004 CBM 099 ext [Milov,V] 12...Nf6 12...c5 13.dxc5 bxc5 14.Bc3 Nf6 15.0-0 Ne4 16.Nf4!? 13.0-0 Re8 14.Rc1 c6 14...Bxb4!? 15.axb4 c6 makes sense after White has removed his rook from a1 15.Bxe7 Rxe7 16.Re1 Qd6 17.Nf4 Bc8?! This idea to improve the position of the bishop simply doesn't work. Alas, Black shouls defend passively, e.g. 17...Rc7 18.Qa4 Rc7 It was probably better for Black to admit his mistake and play 18...Bb7 19.f3! Be6 20.e4 dxe4?! The position after 20...Qd7 21.Nxe6 Qxe6 22.e5 Ne8 23.f4 is difficult for Black, according to GM A.Korotylev, but the text move is even worse. 21.fxe4 Qd7 21...b5 22.Qd1 Qd7 23.e5 Nd5 24.Nd3± A.Korotylev 22.d5! cxd5 23.Qxd7 Rxd7 24.Nxe6! fxe6 25.Bh3! Kh8 26.e5 Ng8 27.Bxe6 Rdd8 After 27...Re7 28.Bxd5 Rd8 White should convert his extra pawn but it was more stubborn than allowing White's rook to invade the 7th rank. 28.Rc7 d4 29.Bd7! Black decided that further resistance was senseless. In the event of 29.Bd7 Ne7 30.Rd1 Nd5 31.Rb7 Rdb8 32.Rxb8+ Rxb8 33.Rxd4 Ne7 34.Bb5 White wins a pawn, and his rook again breaks to the 7nd rank. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2864Anand,V27861–02013E46Moscow Tal Memorial 8th5

 

***

Vishy Anand also was the victim in the following example:

Carlsen-Anand, Bilbao 2012, Black to move:

 

White has a spatial advantage, and if he consolidates, he will simply be better. Anand therefore decided to try to throw some TNT into the middle of the board. He played the dynamic and dangerous 15…d5!.

For many club players, such an unpleasant surprise would be equal to a mental knockout. They would never recover, especially after finding out that the natural 16.exd5 Nxd5! 17.cxd5 Rxd5 leads to an edge for Black, as White loses the d4-knight.

However, Carlsen knew his way out of the danger zone. And again, a seemingly unimportant diagonal played a major role:

16.Nxc6 bxc6

 

17.Qe1!

Thanks to the threat Bc3-a5 White gets vital time, evacuating his queen out of the X-ray with a tempo. Because of this resource White is still a bit better.

In the following fight Carlsen skilfully increased his advantage, sacrificing a pawn for positional gains, and after Blacks 24th move the following position has arisen:

 

White has a clear edge. Black's knight on g7 is a poor creature, and the pawns along the e-file are very weak. Most club players would try to double or even triple along the e-file, trying to regain the e6-pawn. However, that would also allow Black to exchange his bad knight.

Carlsen, with his extraordinary chess vision, has discovered a different plan. He understood that not the e6-pawn, but the h7-pawn is the weakest spot in Black's camp. And again, a diagonal will be in the spotlight. The queen will travel along the c1-h6 highway.

Carlsen played 25.Nh3! and it soon transpired that Black is helpless against the Qd2-h6+Nh3-g5 maneuver. White won soon.

Here's the complete game:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.Bb5+ During the whole tournament Carlsen consistently and mostly sucessfully avoided any heated theoretical debates in the openings, opting for lines such as 2.d3, or a quick exd5 against the French Defence. Also in this game he avoids the Open Sicilian with 3.d4 , his last Najdorf against the World Champion was rather disappointing: cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.g3 e6 7.Bg2 Be7 8.0-0 0-0 9.Nce2 Qc7 10.b3 e5!? 11.Nf5 Bxf5 12.exf5 d5! 13.Bxd5 Rd8 14.c4 Nxd5 15.cxd5 Qa5 16.Qd2 Qxd2 17.Bxd2 Rxd5 18.Be3 Nc6 1/2,Carlsen,M (2814)-Anand,V (2810)/Wijk aan Zee/2011/ 3...Bd7 The most solid response and the result of our game will hardly change this long-standing verdict. However, there have been some recent developments after the more enterprising 3...Nd7!? - see the notes to Bologan-Topalov, ECC Eilat 2012. 4.Bxd7+ Qxd7 5.c4 This continuation is White's best chance to fight for an opening edge - he puts his pawns on the light squares, as he has just exchanged the light-squared bishops. 5.0-0 occurs only rarely in top-level games and is generally considered too soft: Nf6 5...Nc6 6.Qe2 g6 7.c3 Bg7 8.Rd1 e5!? 9.b4 cxb4 10.cxb4 Nge7 11.d4 exd4 12.Bb2 0-0 13.b5 Ne5 14.Nxd4 Rac8 15.Nd2 d5 16.h3 Rfe8 17.Rab1 Qc7 18.Rbc1 Qb6 19.Rxc8 Nxc8!? 20.exd5 Nd6 21.Qf1 Rc8 Short,N (2698) -Anand,V (2811)/London/2011/ 6.Qe2 Simply boring is 6.Re1 Nc6 7.c3 e6 8.d4 cxd4 9.cxd4 d5 10.e5 Ne4 11.Nbd2 Nxd2 12.Bxd2 Be7 13.Rc1 0-0 14.Rc3 Rfc8 15.a3 Bd8 16.Qb1 Ne7 17.Rec1 Rxc3 18.Rxc3 Rc8 19.Qc2 h6 20.Rxc8 Qxc8 21.Qxc8 Nxc8= 1/2,Kuzubov,Y (2623)-Areshchenko,A (2691)/UKR-ch Kiev/2012/ 6...Nc6 7.Rd1 g6 8.c3 Qg4 9.Re1 Ne5 10.Nxe5 Qxe2 11.Rxe2 dxe5 12.Na3 Bg7 13.Nc4 Nd7 14.d3 0-0 15.a4 b6 16.Be3 Rfd8 17.Rd2 Rac8 18.g4 Nf8 19.f4 exf4 20.Bxf4 Ne6 21.Be3 Bf6 22.Rad1 Bg5 23.Kf2 Bf4 24.h4 h6= Mamedov,R (2634)-Negi,P (2664)/Istanbul olm/2012/ 5...Nf6 Black intends to develop his kingside first and possibly use the c-file before he plays Nc6. The alternative is 5...Nc6 6.Nc3 g6 7.d4 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bg7 9.Nde2!? seems more testing, as after 9.Be3 commits the bishop, Black has reasonable counterplay after Nf6 10.h3!? 10.f3 0-0 11.0-0 a6 12.a4 e6 13.Nde2 13.Rc1 Ne5 14.b3 d5 15.cxd5 exd5 16.Nxd5 Nxd5 17.exd5 Rfe8 18.Bf2 Qxd5 19.Qc2 Qd7 20.Rcd1 Rac8 21.Qb1 Qc7 22.Rfe1 Nd7= Adams,M (2722) -Dominguez Perez,L (2725)/London/2012/ 13...Rac8 14.Rc1 Rfe8 15.Bf2 Qe7 16.b3 Nd7 17.Nd4 Nb4 18.Kh1 Nc5 19.Bg1 h5 20.Rb1 Qd8 21.Nde2 Qc7 22.Qd2 Red8 23.Nd1 Nc6 24.Ne3 f5!? 25.exf5 gxf5 26.Nc2 Qf7 27.Nf4 Ne7 Tiviakov, S (2656)-Nakamura,H (2775)/Hoogeveen/2012/ (30) 28.Rfd1∞ 10...0-0 11.0-0 a6 12.a4 Rfc8 13.b3 e6 13...Qd8 14.Qd2 Nd7 15.Rab1 Nc5 16.Rfd1 Na5 17.Qc2 Rab8 18.b4 Nxc4 19.bxc5 Na3 20.Qb3 Nxb1 21.Nxb1 dxc5 22.Ne6 Qa5 23.Nxg7 Kxg7 24.Nc3 b5 25.axb5 axb5 26.Nd5 Qa4 27.Qb2+ f6 28.Ra1 Qxe4 29.Ra7 1-0 Spasov,V (2581)-Georgiev,K (2423)/Sunny Beach 2012/CB37_2012 14.Rc1 d5 15.Nxc6 bxc6 16.e5 Ne8 17.f4 a5 17...Qd8!?= prevents both a5 and Ne4. 18.Ne4 Bf8 19.Rf3 Qd8 20.Nc5 Rcb8 21.Bf2 Nc7 22.Qe2 Rb4 23.Kh2 Be7 /<=>,Carlsen,M (2826)-Nepomniachtchi,I (2730)/Moscow/2011/ 9...Nf6 10.f3 0-0 11.0-0 a6 12.a4 e6 White can develop his bishop more actively with 13.Bg5 h6 14.Bh4 Rfd8 15.Rb1 Qc7 16.Kh1 Rd7 17.Rc1 Re8 18.Nd5 exd5?! 18...Qd8! 19.Nxf6+ Bxf6 20.Bxf6 Qxf6= 19.cxd5 Qb6 20.Bf2 Qxb2 21.dxc6 bxc6 22.Rxc6 Rdd8 23.Rxa6 Qb4 24.Rb6 Qc4 25.Nd4 /+/-,Caruana,F (2773)-Anand,V (2780)/Sao Paulo/Bilbao/2012/ This game was played earlier. Although Black's position is quite playable, Anand presumably wanted to give the encounter with Carlsen a different character. 6.Nc3 g6 6...Nc6 7.d4 7.0-0 g6 8.d4 cxd4 9.Nxd4 Bg7 10.Nde2 Qe6!?∞ Kasparov, G (2851)-The World/Internet/1999/ leads to complications, which Black ultimately doesn't have to fear. See the notes to this game in CBM 74. 7...cxd4 8.Nxd4 More often than not Black avoids these complications and simply develops with g6 Now White can avoid the continuation from Kasparov-The World with 8...Qg4 However, here Black has to reckon mainly with 9.Qxg4 9.0-0 Qxd1 10.Rxd1 Nxd4 10...Rc8 11.Nde2 g6 12.f3 Bg7 13.b3 Nd7 14.Be3 0-0 15.Rac1 b6 16.Nd5 Rfd8 17.Nec3 e6 18.Nf4 Nc5 19.Nfe2 a6 20.Rd2 Rd7 21.Rcd1 Bf8 22.Bf4 Rcd8 23.Bg5 Rc8 24.h3 h6 25.Bf4 Rcd8 26.g4 Kg7 27.Kg2 Be7 28.Be3 Rb7 29.Nd4 Rc8 30.Nxc6 Rxc6 31.Bf4 b5 Rozentalis,E (2623) -Alterman,B (2580)/ISR-chT/2010/ 11.Rxd4 Rc8 12.Bg5 Nd7 13.Rc1 g6 14.Nd5 h6 15.Be3 Bg7 16.Rdd1 a6 17.b4 e6 18.Nb6 Nxb6 19.Bxb6 Ke7 20.c5 Be5 21.Rd3 Rc6 22.a4 Rhc8 23.a5 dxc5 24.Bxc5+ Ke8 25.Rcd1 Bf6 26.Kf1 Rd8 27.Ke2 Rcc8= Cheparinov,I (2621)-Lupulescu,C (2546)/EU-ch Warsaw/2005/ 9...Nxg4 10.Nxc6 bxc6 11.Bf4 A more enterprising try is the sacrificial g5!? 11...Rb8 12.h3 Ne5 13.Bxe5 dxe5 14.Na4 14.0-0-0 e6 15.Na4 h5 16.Rd3 Rh6 17.Rhd1 Rg6 18.g3 Rf6 19.f3 Rg6 20.g4 hxg4 21.hxg4 Rh6 22.a3 Be7 23.Kc2 Rh2+ 24.R1d2 Rh1 25.Rd1 Rh2+ 26.R1d2 Rh1 27.c5 Rb5 28.b4 a5 29.Rb3 Laznicka,V (2593)-Gashimov,V (2658)/Moscow/2007/ 14...e6 15.Ke2 Kd7 16.Rhd1+ Kc7 17.Rd3 Be7 18.Rad1 Rhd8 19.Rxd8 Bxd8 20.a3 a5 21.c5 Be7 22.Kd3 f5 23.f3 Rd8+ 24.Kc2 Rb8 25.Kc3 fxe4 26.fxe4 Rf8 27.b4 axb4+ 28.axb4 Bh4 29.Nb6 Rf7 30.Kb3 Bf2 31.Rd6 Bd4 32.Nc4 Rf1 33.Na5+- Ni Hua (2705) -Shengelia,D (2569)/ESP-chT Sabadell/2008/ 12.Bxg5 Bg7!? 12...Ne5 13.b3 Rg8 14.Bh4 Rg4 14...Bg7 15.Kd2 a5 16.Rab1 a4 17.Nxa4 Bh6+ 18.Kc2 Rg4 18...Rxg2 19.Bg3 Nxc4 20.bxc4 Rxa4 21.Rb8+ Kd7 22.Kb3 Ra7 23.f3 Rg5 24.e5 dxe5 25.Rd1+ Ke6 26.a4 Zhang Zhong (2608)-Petrosian,T (2581)/Tiayuan/2005/ 15.Bg3 Bg7 16.Kd2 Ng6 17.f3 Rg5 18.f4 18.Rag1 Bd4 19.Rc1 Kd7 20.Ne2 Bb6 21.h4 Ra5 22.Rc2 Rg8 23.Be1 Ne5 24.Nf4 Ra3 25.Ke2 Bd4 26.Bb4 1/2,Baklan,V (2585)-Atalik,S (2585)/YUG-chT Vrnjacka Banja/1998/ 18...Rg4 18...Ra5 19.a4 Rb8 20.Kc2 f5 21.Rae1 Kd7 22.Rhf1 e6 23.exf5 Rxf5 24.Ne4 Rbf8 25.Rd1 d5 26.Nc5+ Kd6 27.Nd3 /+/-,Soltau, A (2632)-Ugge,A (2567)/corr/2005/ 19.Raf1 h5 20.Nd1 Bh6 21.Nf2 Bxf4+ 22.Ke2 Rg5 23.Nh3 Rxg3 24.hxg3 Bxg3 25.Ng5 /~~ Atalik 13.Ke2 Rb8 14.Nd1 14.Rab1!? Rg8 15.Bf4 Bd4 14...Rb4 15.Rc1 Bxb2 16.Rb1 Ba3 17.Rb3 Rxb3 18.axb3 Kd7 19.Ne3 Rg8 20.h4 Nxe3 21.Bxe3 Rxg2 22.Kf3 Rg8 23.Ra1 Bb4= Jansa,V (2490)-Trapl,J (2340)/Ostrava/1976/ 9.Nde2 Bg7 10.f3 - 5...Nc6 , which transposes back to Caruana-Anand, mentioned above. 7.d4 cxd4 8.Nxd4 Bg7 9.f3 The other main try is 9.h3 , when Qc7!? has recently become popular: 10.Qe2 10.b3 allows the simplifying operation Qa5 11.Bd2 Nxe4! 12.Nxe4 Qe5 13.Qb1 f5 14.Bc3 Qxe4+ 15.Qxe4 fxe4 16.Nb5 Bxc3+ 17.Nxc3 Rf8 18.Nxe4 18.0-0 Na6 19.Rfe1 Nc5 20.Rad1 Kd7 21.Re3 Rac8 22.Rd4 Rf4 23.Nd5 Rf7 24.Rd2 Rc6 25.b4 Na4 26.Rxe4 e6 27.Ne3 Nc3 28.Red4 e5 29.R4d3 Ne4 30.Re2 Ke6= Bologan,V (2665)-Naiditsch,A (2712)/ESP-chT Melilla/2011/ 18...Rf5 18...Nc6 19.Rd1 Rf5 20.0-0 0-0-0 21.f4 Rdf8 22.g3 Kd7 23.Nc3 a6 24.Nd5 b5 Movsesian,S (2751)-Dominguez Perez,L (2717)/ Wijk aan Zee/2009/ 19.0-0 Kd7 20.Rad1 Na6 21.Rfe1 Raf8 22.Re2 Re5 23.g3 Nc5= 1/2,Movsesian,S (2711)-Svidler,P (2741)/EUCup Ohrid/2009/ 10...Nc6 11.Nc2 0-0 12.0-0 a6 12...Rfc8 13.b3 a6 14.Bb2 14.Bd2!? 14...Qa5 15.Ne3 Nd4 16.Qe1 Ne6 17.Rb1 Nf4 18.Ba1 b5 19.Ncd5 Qxe1 20.Nxf6+ Bxf6 21.Rfxe1 Bxa1 22.Rxa1 Kf8 23.Kf1 Nd3 24.Red1 Nc5= Alavkin,A (2460)-Kokarev, D (2603)/Kazan/2009/ 13.Bd2 e6 14.Rac1 Rfe8 15.Be3N 15.Ne3 Nd4 16.Qd3 Nd7 17.Kh1 Nc5 18.Qb1 Rac8 19.b4 Nd7 20.Qd3 Qb8 21.f4 b5 /=/+,Malakhov,V (2715)-Hracek,Z (2606)/EU Cup Ohrid/2009/ 15...Ne5 16.Na3 Rac8 17.b3 Qa5 18.Nab1 d5 19.f4 Nc6 20.e5 Nh5 21.Qf2?! 21.g4 Ng3 22.Qf2 Nxf1 23.Bb6 Qb4 24.Bc5= 21...d4! 22.Bxd4 Nxd4 23.Qxd4 g5! 24.fxg5 Bxe5 25.Qf2 Bf4 25...Ng3! 26.Rfe1 Bd6 Safarli 26.Ne4 Bxc1 27.Rxc1 Qe5 28.Re1 Kh8 29.Nbd2 Tiviakov,S (2656)-Hou,Y (2623)/ Hoogeveen/2012/ 9.0-0 Nc6 once again leads to Kasparov-The World. 9...Qc7!? With f3 instead of h3 this move is still rare - Black doesn't have the blow on e4 from the previous note! The standard continuation is 9...0-0 10.Be3 10.0-0 Rc8 11.b3 d5! is Ivanchuk's brilliant idea, Black easily equalised in the stem game 12.exd5 Nxd5 13.Nxd5 e6 14.Be3 exd5 15.cxd5 Na6 16.Rc1 Rxc1 17.Qxc1 Nb4 18.Qd2 Nxd5 19.Ne2 Qe7 1/2,Delchev,A (2577)-Ivanchuk,V (2704)/EU-ch Istanbul/2003/ 10.Bg5 is rare and for a good reason - here Black easily gets a good position with the accurate Nc6! 10...Rc8 11.b3 Qd8 12.Qd2 Nc6 13.Nde2 a6 14.a4 Nd7 11.Nde2 a6 12.a4 Qc7! 13.b3 Qa5 14.Qd2 b5! 15.cxb5 axb5 16.0-0 16.Nxb5 Nxe4 16...bxa4 17.bxa4 Rfc8 17...Nd7!? 18.Rfb1 Nd4 19.Nxd4 Rxc3 20.Kh1 Qc5 20...Rc5 21.Rd1 Rc4 22.Be3 Qa5 23.Qd3 Rc3 24.Qe2 Nd7 25.h3 Qa6 26.Qe1 Rc4 27.a5 Nc5 28.Rab1 Gharamian,T (2471) -Savchenko,S (2545)/Metz/2007/ Na4 10...Rc8 10...Nc6!? 11.0-0 a6 12.a4 e6 transposes to a satisfactory position from the 5...Nc6 lines, mentioned in the above notes. 11.b3 a6 12.a4 e6 12...Nc6 13.0-0 Qd8 14.Rb1 e6 15.Nde2 Qa5 16.Qxd6 Ne8 17.Qd2 Rd8 18.Qe1 Rd3 19.Nd1 Qb4 20.Nc1 Rd7 21.Qxb4 Nxb4 22.Nf2 Nc2 23.Bc5 b6 24.Bxb6 Na3 25.Ncd3 Nxb1 26.Rxb1 Balogh,C (2664)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2705)/Saint Louis/ 2012/ 13.Rc1 13.Nde2 Nc6 14.0-0 d5! 15.exd5 exd5 16.c5 Re8 17.Bf2 Rad8 18.Nd4 Qc7 19.Nxc6 bxc6 20.Bd4 a5 21.Ra2 Rb8 22.Ne2 Qb7 23.Qa1 Nh5 Laznicka,V (2610)-Wojtaszek,R (2635)/CZE-chT/2007/ 13...Nc6 14.0-0 d5 15.exd5 exd5 16.Nxc6 bxc6 17.cxd5 cxd5 17...Nxd5!?= 18.Bd4 Rd8 19.Qd3 Qb7 20.Ne2 Ne8 21.Rc3 Nc7 22.Bxg7 Kxg7 23.Nd4 Ne6 24.Nxe6+ fxe6 25.Rfc1 Rac8 26.Qe3 Rxc3 27.Rxc3 Qe7 28.Rc6 e5 Ni Hua (2625) -Areshchenko,A (2570)/Moscow/2005/ 9...Nc6 10.Nde2 and we are again back in Caruana-Anand. 10.b3 Qa5 Black's idea is to lure the bishop to b2 instead of its usual deployment on the c1-h6 diagonal (e3 or g5). 10...Nc6 11.Be3 Qa5 12.Rc1 Nh5 13.Nde2!? White avoids the endgame after 13.0-0 Nxd4 14.Bxd4 Bxd4+ 15.Qxd4 Qc5= /+/= 13...0-0 14.0-0 Kh8 15.Qd5 Qa6 16.Qd2 Qa5 17.Kh1 f5 18.exf5 gxf5 19.Nd5 Qd8 19...Qxd2 20.Rfd1 Be5 21.Ndf4 Qe8 22.c5 Nxf4 23.Nxf4 dxc5 24.Rxc5 24.Nd3! 24...Rd8 25.Qe1 Rxd1 26.Qxd1 Kasparov,S (2500)-Varga,C (2349)/Pardubice/2007/ Bd6 A similar type of position arises after 10...0-0 11.Be3 Qa5 12.Qd2 Nc6 13.Rc1= /+/=,Loaiza,Y (1902)-Ramirez,H (2089)/Puerto Boyaca/2012/ White's space advantage gives him a slight pull. 11.Bb2 11.Bd2 also deserves consideration, but Nc6 is still fine for Black after 12.Nd5 12.Nde2 0-0 12...Qd8 13.Bc3 e6 14.Nxc6 bxc6 15.Nxf6+ Bxf6 16.Bxf6 Qxf6 17.0-0 Rd8= 11...Nc6 12.0-0 0-0 13.Nce2N       Although objectively this novelty is not particularly dangerous, it's in keeping with White's strategy to avoid excessive simplification and retain fighting chances. 13.Kh1 Nd7 13...Nxd4 14.Qxd4 Nxe4 15.Qxe4 Bxc3 16.Bxc3 Qxc3 17.Qxe7 a5 14.Nd5 Rfe8 15.Bc3 Qd8 16.Nb5 16.Qd2!? 16...Bxc3 17.Ndxc3 a6 18.Nd4 Qb6 19.Nc2 Rac8 20.Qd2 Qc5 21.Qe3 Nce5 22.Rac1 b5 23.f4 Ng4 Bolshagin,V (2061)-Kokarev,D (2583)/Moscow/2011/ 23...Qxe3 24.Nxe3 Nd3 25.Rcd1 bxc4 26.Rd2 Nb4 27.Nxc4 Nb6= 24.Qf3∞ 13.Nd5 Nxd5 is simpler: 13...Qc5 14.b4 Qxc4 14...Nxb4 15.Nxe7+ Kh8 16.Rf2!? Qxc4 16...Nd7!? 17.Qa4 a5 18.a3 Qc7 19.Nxg6+ hxg6 20.axb4 15.Nxc6 Nxd5 16.Rc1 Qxa2 17.Bxg7 Kxg7 18.exd5 bxc6 19.Qd4+ 19.dxc6 14.exd5 Nxd4 15.Bxd4 Bxd4+ 16.Qxd4 b5= <=> 13...Rfd8 Anand returns to the idea of pushing d5 either after preparation (e6), or directly as in the game. 13...Nd7 14.Kh1 14.Bc3?! Qxc3 15.Nxc3 Bxd4+ 14...a6∞ 14.Bc3 14.Kh1!? /\ Qb6 14...Nd7!? 15.Qd2 prevents the following central break. However, Black's position remains solid and he can react differently already on move 14. 14...Qb6 15.Kh1 d5! 16.Nxc6 This is the only way to keep the tension in the position. ≤16.exd5 Nxd5! 17.cxd5 Rxd5 wins the piece back and already Black can claim a slight edge: 18.Qe1 Nxd4 19.Nxd4 Bxd4 20.Bxd4 Rxd4 20...Qxd4 21.Qxe7 Rd7 22.Qe2 Rad8 21.Qxe7 Rad8 16.cxd5 Nxd5 17.exd5 -16.exd5 16...bxc6 17.Qe1! Rdc8?! Leaving the d-file perhaps isn't a direct mistake, but it's certainly unnatural. The most logical response was 17...a5 /\ 18.e5 Nd7!? 19.e6 19.cxd5 cxd5 20.Bd4 Qb4 21.Bc3 Qb6= 19...d4 20.Bd2!? 20.Bxd4 Bxd4 21.Nxd4 Qxd4 22.Rd1 Qa7 23.exd7 Rxd7= 20.exf7+ Kxf7 21.Bd2 e5 22.Ng3 Kg8 23.Ne4 Nc5= /<=> 20...Nc5!? 20...fxe6 21.Nf4 e5 22.Ne6 21.exf7+ Kxf7= 18.e5 Ne8 ≤18...Nd7 19.e6 Bxc3 19...fxe6 20.Bxg7 Kxg7 21.Nf4 e5 22.cxd5 20.Nxc3 Nf6 21.exf7+ Kxf7 22.Rd1!? dxc4 23.Ne4 Nxe4 24.Qxe4 cxb3 25.f4 19.e6!?       Carlsen possibly felt his opponent's insecurity and goes for a direct attack. His approach pays off with surprising speed, but Black could have defended better. The alternative was 19.f4 e6!? is safer. 19...dxc4 20.f5! 20.bxc4 Qa6 20...gxf5 21.Rxf5 19...Nc7 20.f5 e6 21.f6 Bf8∞ 19...fxe6 20.Nf4 20.Bxg7 is harmless: Nxg7 21.Nf4 Qc7 22.Nxe6 Qd6 23.Nxg7 Kxg7= 20...Bxc3 21.Qxc3 d4 21...Ng7 22.Rae1 22.Qe5 Qb8= 22.c5 Qc7 23.Nd3!? 23.Qxg7+ Kxg7 24.Nxe6+ Kf6 25.Nxc7 Rxc7 [+] 22...d4 23.Qd2 c5 24.g4 transposes back to the game 22.Qd2!? 22.Qe1 c5 23.Nxe6 Rc6 24.Nf4 e6 25.Nd3 a5 /<=> is pleasant and almost riskless for White. However, here Black's defence is simpler than in the game, so Carlsen ambitiously envisages a different route for his queen. 22...c5 23.Rae1 Ng7 24.g4! Limits Black's knight and prepares the follwing manoeuvre, which is easy to overlook. Rc6? And sure enough, Anand goes astray and fails to meet White's most dangerous idea. Black had better options, leading to balanced positions: 24...Qc6 25.Nh3 25.Re5 25...Rf8 26.Qh6 Rxf3 27.Kg1 Rxf1+ 28.Rxf1 Qe4 29.Qxh7+ 29.Ng5?? Qxg4+ 30.Kh1 Qh5 29.Rf4 Qe3+ 30.Kg2 Qd2+ 31.Kg1 Qe3+= 29...Kxh7 30.Ng5+ Kg8 31.Nxe4 Rc8 32.Ng5 Rc6 33.Rf7 Rd6 34.Kf2 Rd7 35.Rf4 24...Rf8 White would have possibly preferred to change his plan with 25.Nd3 25.Nh3 Rf6!? 25...Qc6 -24...Qc6 26.Qh6 g5 27.Qxg5 Qc6 28.Ng1!? 28.Nf4 h6 29.Qe5 Raf8 30.Re4 Qd6 28...a5 29.Re5∞ 24...Qd6 25.Re4 25.Nh3 e5 26.Qh6 Ne6 27.Ng5 Nxg5 28.Qxg5 Qf6 29.Qxe5 Qxe5 30.Rxe5 Rc7= 25...a5!? 25...Rf8 26.Nd3 26.Kg2 26.Rfe1 Rf8 25.Nh3! Suddenly Black is in trouble - his queen joins the defence one move too late. Ne8 25...Qd8 26.Qh6 Kh8 27.Ng5 Qg8 28.Re4 Rf8 28...e5 29.Rxe5 Ne6 30.Kg2± 29.Rg1!? Rf6 30.Rg3 Ne8 31.Rh3 Rf7 32.Rxe6!? 32.Nxf7+ Qxf7 33.Re2 /+/- 32...Rxe6 33.Nxe6 Nf6 34.Nxc5 g5 35.Rg3± 26.Qh6 Nf6 27.Ng5 d3?! Hastens the end. 27...Qa6 28.Re5 Qc8 29.Rfe1 Qf8 30.Qxf8+ 30.Qh3!? 30...Rxf8 31.Nxe6 Rfc8 32.Nf4± 28.Re5! Kh8 28...Qc7 29.Nxe6 Rxe6 29...Qxe5 30.Qg7# 30.Rxe6+- 28...Qd8 29.Nxe6 Rxe6 30.Rxe6 d2 31.Rd1 Qd3 32.Qe3+- 28...Rd8 29.Nxh7! Nxh7 30.Qxg6+ Kf8 30...Kh8 31.Rh5 31.Qxh7 d2 32.Qh8+ Kf7 33.Qh5+ Kf8 34.Rd1+- 29.Rd1+- Here White has no immediate mate, but Black remains completely paralysed, as due to Nf7 he has no access to the d8-square. Qa6 30.a4!? 30.Rxd3 Qxa2 31.Re1! Re8 31...Kg8 32.Red1 Qa5 33.f4!+- 32.Red1 Qb2 33.Rd8 Rc8 34.Nxe6 Ng8 35.Rxc8 Rxc8 36.Qe3+- also wins, but Carlsen doesn't want to give Black even the slightest chance. 30.a4 Qc8 31.Rxd3 Qg8 32.Rde3+- 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2843Anand,V27801–02012B52Grand Slam Final 5th9

 

***

All Carlsen's solutions in this article have something in common: once spotted, the ideas are pretty simple. Therefore, they might seem to be almost banal, not worthy of a World Champion. However, according to my coaching experience, they are in fact very difficult to find aboard.

Please remember that your own games are no different. Many positions that you will get in the following months will contain simple yet very original ideas, hidden gems. It is up to you to be creative and diligent enough to find them.

Once you will be able find unexpected and original ideas more often than your opponents, you will became a considerably better player.

Links


Jan Markos is a Slovakian chess author, trainer, and grandmaster. His book Under the Surface was the English Chess Federation´s 2018 Book of the Year. His last book, The Secret Ingredient, co-authored with David Navara, focuses on the practical aspects of play, e.g. time-management over the board, how to prepare against a specific opponent, or how to use chess engines during the training process. Markos was the U16 European Champion twenty years ago. At present he helps his pupils from several countries to achieve similar successes. Apart from focusing on the royal game, he is also the author of several non-chess books, focused on critical thinking, moral dilemmas, and phenomenology.

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.