Mihail Marin: My most memorable game

by Mihail Marin
7/7/2021 – A multiple Romanian champion, Mihail Marin’s first major international success was achieved in 1987, when he qualified to the Interzonal Tournament played in Szirák. A famed author, he was described by Jeremy Silman as “one of the world’s finest chess writers”. Marin shares with us his most memorable game, a fantastic win with the white pieces played at the 1996 Chess Olympiad in Yerevan.

ChessBase 16 - Mega package Edition 2021 ChessBase 16 - Mega package Edition 2021

Your key to fresh ideas, precise analyses and targeted training!
Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.

More...

MMMG #10: Optimal form

Mihail MarinMihail Marin was born in Bucharest on 21 April 1965. A multiple Romanian champion, his first major international success was achieved in 1987 when he qualified to the Interzonal Tournament played in Szirák. Three years later, he played at the Interzonal in Manila. In 1988, Marin won the bronze medal on board 3 at the Thessaloniki Olympiad — that was the first of twelve Olympiads in which he represented Romania, the last one so far being Baku 2016.

For many years, Marin worked as a second of Judit Polgar, and in 2005 he accompanied the Hungarian star to three elite tournaments, including the San Luis World Championship.

Besides being a strong player, Marin has written a number of well-received books. Learn from the Legends was named the 2005 ChessCafe Book of the Year, while Secrets of Chess Defence was nominated for the 2003 ChessCafe Book of the Year, just to name two of his biggest successes. Jeremy Silman, also a well-known author, wrote of Learn from the Legends: “I can’t recall having seen a better book in the last two decades”.

In a lengthy interview with the Romanian grandmaster after he won the ChessCafe Book of the Year award in 2005, the then 40-year-old was asked whether he planned to fully devote to his career as a writer and teacher. Marin responded:

Time and human resources are so awfully limited that I haven’t managed yet to entirely adapt myself to the dual character of my professional activity. I achieve the best results (in both fields!) when I manage to induce in myself the psychological approach of an amateur: the pure pleasure of practising my hobbies without any concrete purpose. However, it can also happen that I work on a book longing for the next tournament to come or, on the contrary, to ruin a well started tournament just because I bear in mind so many things to write.

Taimanov wrote that whenever he plays chess he relaxes from playing the piano and vice versa, adding that this allowed him to have a never-ending vacation. He must have had a very happy life. This is the state of mind I would dream of.

The Romanian is very much an active player still. In fact, he is currently playing the Benasque International Open in the heart of the Pyrenees.

Marin has authored or collaborated with more than 30 ChessBase FritzTrainers.

Mihail Marin

Photo: Andreas Kontokanis


Played at the 1996 Chess Olympiad in Yerevan, Marin’s most memorable game was a sharp struggle against Belarusian GM Aleksej Aleksandrov.

Marin, Mihail vs. Aleksandron, Aleksej
Chess Olympiad, 1996 - Yerevan 
 

How could chess players, be they professionals or amateurs, ensure reaching the best form during a tournament? Many generations of players and trainers have concerned themselves with this critical tension, but as far as I know, nobody has given a 100% valid answer yet.

You sit down for your first round game, hoping for the best and trying hard not to think of the worst. You must be aware of the fact that only a few rounds later, or maybe just after the end of the tournament, you will be able to find out whether you were in optimal form or not. I have since ever tried to train my mind before the tournaments by solving tactical puzzles, and this method usually gave good results.

With the passing of the years, I have discovered that in order to play tournaments and games I could be really proud of, one more ingredient, which I could not control, was necessary: I needed to feel well in the city or resort hosting the tournament. Judging from several points of view, the Yerevan 1996 Olympiad was anything but the optimal environment. Our hotel (was it called Yerebuny?!) was modest, and most of my teammates considered the food to be absolutely awful.

Personally, I did not feel anything of that. After having served in the army, I cannot be so easily scared about such details. Following the presidential elections and the ensuing failed putsch, tanks and soldiers invaded the streets and one could hear shootings and cries during the night. It was a bit weird, of course, but it also added a bit of excitement. I remember that I wanted to take a photo of the nicely aligned tanks in the central square, when a soldier indicated that I should not.

On top of that, I had a permanent headache during the first half of the tournament. The travel had been long and tiring and there might have been some mystic influence of the Ararat mountain, the place where Noah’s Ark had landed long, long time ago. Despite all these factors, I greatly enjoyed my participation in this Olympiad. A quarter of a century has passed, so my memories are not so vivid any more, but I believe that I was touched by the
people’s kindness and warmth, and the fact that I was permanently curious about the culture of this small and remote country.

In short, the place offered me the best environment — it made me feel like in a genuine love story with the city and its people. I started with two wins and after a day off I drew with black against Michael Adams. I remember how amused I was during that game, noticing that my opponent’s rating was 155 points higher than mine. During my numerous opens, I usually got the reversed situation!

Ye Jiangchuan, Vladimir Kramnik

China’s Ye Jiangchuan facing Russia’s Vladimir Kramnik at the 1996 Olympiad | Photo: Rosa de las Nieves

In the fifth round, we faced the strong team of Belarus, with Boris Gelfrand on top board. On the second board, I was playing against a very talented and strong young player, Aleksej Aleksandrov. Some of my colleagues took good care to scare me in regard to the “beast” I was going to play against.

Things developed my way and I managed to win a beautiful game. A friend of mine, belonging to the world’s elite in those years, congratulated me and said that he thinks this would be the best game of the whole Olympiad!

Towards the end of the tournament, I found out that there was a contest for the best three games, rewarded by the Armenian president Levon Ter Petrosian with 4000, 2000 and 1000 US dollars respectively. I quickly annotated the game — handwritten on paper — and handed it to the coordinator of the contest, the legendary grandmaster Eduard Gufeld. I vividly
remember the scene. Gufeld, who was eating a huge sandwich, used his free hand to take my paper and crumple it while carelessly putting it in one of his pockets.

I did not have big expectations after that episode, but one year later, the results of the contest were announced: my game was awarded with the second prize! I was very pleased, of course, both sentimentally and financially, but was annoyed by a small detail. My aforementioned friend, who was part of the jury, did not award any point to my win! I do not know what made him change his mind, but had he placed it even on the third place in his evaluation, I would have got the first prize!

 

Marin's English Love Vol.1 and 2 - A complete repertoire for White after 1.c4

The aim of these Dvd's is to build a repertoire after 1.c4 and 2.g3 for White. The first DVD includes the systems 1...e5, the Dutch and Indian setups. The second DVD includes the systems with 1...c5, 1...c6 and 1...e6.


Links


GM Mihail Marin, born in 1965, has several times been Romanian champion, played in 12 Olympiads (earning an individual bronze medal in 1988) and first made the leap over the Elo barrier of 2600 in 2001. Marin possesses a rare gift for a grandmaster — he is able to explain in readily comprehensible terms the ideas behind moves, variations and positions. This ability is there for all to admire in his contributions to ChessBase Magazine.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

DrNg DrNg 7/14/2021 06:35
Mr Marin's choice of words for describing the Yerevan situation may not have been ideal, but he was only a spectator to events which should not be over-dramatized either (there was no fatality, for instance). If something was out of line here, it's the arrogant and ignorant judgment of his human quality. Otherwise, I guess congratulaions are in order for a good performance in Benasque.
Mihail Marin Mihail Marin 7/8/2021 09:07
@lajosarpad
Thank you very much for your warm words and thoughts!
When writing, I always try to be myself, displaying certain self-irony and telling all the truth I know. That becomes a bit more difficult when playing... But at least I try to have fun at it!
Cu mulțumiri si stima,
Mihail
lajosarpad lajosarpad 7/8/2021 04:12
@Mihail Marin I appreciate your writings and the help you have provided to Polgár for many years and you have a decent share of excellent moves over the board as well. I appreciate honest writings more than sugar-coated self-censorship in these strange times. Keep up the good work and remember that for every critical remark, there are ten readers who think about your work and person fondly. While Romanian is not my main language, I'm quite fluent in it. My mother had packed bags to flee to Hungary if the revolution fails in 1989, while my father was doing what brave men had to do at dire times. As a little boy I could not understand anything at the time. Cu stima (with respect), Lajos Árpád.
Mihail Marin Mihail Marin 7/8/2021 01:05
@mfoob
Your interpretation is wrong. I was under terror, too.
What I meant was that the dangerous situation, the same as the bad food and other negative elements eventually stimulated me to do the only thing I could: play chess.
The same happened when we had shootings in my home town after Ceausescu’s fall. I concentrated on chess and a few weeks later I was rewarded with one of my best results ever.
I could have tried to explain what a hero I was to survive in Yerevan, but that would have been nonsense. When everything is bad, you have to find a way for the good.
Anyway, I don’t mind if people “question the man” in me, as long as they find this uplifting spiritually.
mfoolb mfoolb 7/8/2021 09:36
@Mihail Marin
to sum it all up what, in my opinion, was wrong - and you are probably missing - is how your wording suggest that the origin of your positive emotions was the terror of people in a war situation.
Mihail Marin Mihail Marin 7/7/2021 06:35
@lajosarpad
Thank you!
Mihail Marin Mihail Marin 7/7/2021 06:33
mfoolb
I could have, of course, written that we were all scared to death, which was not far from truth. I don’t think it was wrong that we continued playing in this critical situation. If it was wrong, then you should question all the men and women playing there, including the best in the world.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 7/7/2021 10:56
@mfoolb at least he was honest. I would have been extremely sad to hear those things if I was in the same situation.

Domnu Marin, belated congratulations for the second prize for brilliancy!
mfoolb mfoolb 7/7/2021 10:03
As much as his game could be a great game, the following passage made me want to avoid continue reading and question the man forgotting about the player:

"Following the presidential elections and the ensuing failed putsch, tanks and soldiers invaded the streets and one could hear shootings and cries during the night. It was a bit weird, of course, but it also added a bit of excitement."
philidorchess philidorchess 7/7/2021 04:44
Beautiful!!
1