Mihail Marin: My most memorable game

by Mihail Marin
7/7/2021 – A multiple Romanian champion, Mihail Marin’s first major international success was achieved in 1987, when he qualified to the Interzonal Tournament played in Szirák. A famed author, he was described by Jeremy Silman as “one of the world’s finest chess writers”. Marin shares with us his most memorable game, a fantastic win with the white pieces played at the 1996 Chess Olympiad in Yerevan.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

MMMG #10: Optimal form

Mihail MarinMihail Marin was born in Bucharest on 21 April 1965. A multiple Romanian champion, his first major international success was achieved in 1987 when he qualified to the Interzonal Tournament played in Szirák. Three years later, he played at the Interzonal in Manila. In 1988, Marin won the bronze medal on board 3 at the Thessaloniki Olympiad — that was the first of twelve Olympiads in which he represented Romania, the last one so far being Baku 2016.

For many years, Marin worked as a second of Judit Polgar, and in 2005 he accompanied the Hungarian star to three elite tournaments, including the San Luis World Championship.

Besides being a strong player, Marin has written a number of well-received books. Learn from the Legends was named the 2005 ChessCafe Book of the Year, while Secrets of Chess Defence was nominated for the 2003 ChessCafe Book of the Year, just to name two of his biggest successes. Jeremy Silman, also a well-known author, wrote of Learn from the Legends: “I can’t recall having seen a better book in the last two decades”.

In a lengthy interview with the Romanian grandmaster after he won the ChessCafe Book of the Year award in 2005, the then 40-year-old was asked whether he planned to fully devote to his career as a writer and teacher. Marin responded:

Time and human resources are so awfully limited that I haven’t managed yet to entirely adapt myself to the dual character of my professional activity. I achieve the best results (in both fields!) when I manage to induce in myself the psychological approach of an amateur: the pure pleasure of practising my hobbies without any concrete purpose. However, it can also happen that I work on a book longing for the next tournament to come or, on the contrary, to ruin a well started tournament just because I bear in mind so many things to write.

Taimanov wrote that whenever he plays chess he relaxes from playing the piano and vice versa, adding that this allowed him to have a never-ending vacation. He must have had a very happy life. This is the state of mind I would dream of.

The Romanian is very much an active player still. In fact, he is currently playing the Benasque International Open in the heart of the Pyrenees.

Marin has authored or collaborated with more than 30 ChessBase FritzTrainers.

Mihail Marin

Photo: Andreas Kontokanis


Played at the 1996 Chess Olympiad in Yerevan, Marin’s most memorable game was a sharp struggle against Belarusian GM Aleksej Aleksandrov.

Marin, Mihail vs. Aleksandron, Aleksej
Chess Olympiad, 1996 - Yerevan 
 

How could chess players, be they professionals or amateurs, ensure reaching the best form during a tournament? Many generations of players and trainers have concerned themselves with this critical tension, but as far as I know, nobody has given a 100% valid answer yet.

You sit down for your first round game, hoping for the best and trying hard not to think of the worst. You must be aware of the fact that only a few rounds later, or maybe just after the end of the tournament, you will be able to find out whether you were in optimal form or not. I have since ever tried to train my mind before the tournaments by solving tactical puzzles, and this method usually gave good results.

With the passing of the years, I have discovered that in order to play tournaments and games I could be really proud of, one more ingredient, which I could not control, was necessary: I needed to feel well in the city or resort hosting the tournament. Judging from several points of view, the Yerevan 1996 Olympiad was anything but the optimal environment. Our hotel (was it called Yerebuny?!) was modest, and most of my teammates considered the food to be absolutely awful.

Personally, I did not feel anything of that. After having served in the army, I cannot be so easily scared about such details. Following the presidential elections and the ensuing failed putsch, tanks and soldiers invaded the streets and one could hear shootings and cries during the night. It was a bit weird, of course, but it also added a bit of excitement. I remember that I wanted to take a photo of the nicely aligned tanks in the central square, when a soldier indicated that I should not.

On top of that, I had a permanent headache during the first half of the tournament. The travel had been long and tiring and there might have been some mystic influence of the Ararat mountain, the place where Noah’s Ark had landed long, long time ago. Despite all these factors, I greatly enjoyed my participation in this Olympiad. A quarter of a century has passed, so my memories are not so vivid any more, but I believe that I was touched by the
people’s kindness and warmth, and the fact that I was permanently curious about the culture of this small and remote country.

In short, the place offered me the best environment — it made me feel like in a genuine love story with the city and its people. I started with two wins and after a day off I drew with black against Michael Adams. I remember how amused I was during that game, noticing that my opponent’s rating was 155 points higher than mine. During my numerous opens, I usually got the reversed situation!

Ye Jiangchuan, Vladimir Kramnik

China’s Ye Jiangchuan facing Russia’s Vladimir Kramnik at the 1996 Olympiad | Photo: Rosa de las Nieves

In the fifth round, we faced the strong team of Belarus, with Boris Gelfrand on top board. On the second board, I was playing against a very talented and strong young player, Aleksej Aleksandrov. Some of my colleagues took good care to scare me in regard to the “beast” I was going to play against.

Things developed my way and I managed to win a beautiful game. A friend of mine, belonging to the world’s elite in those years, congratulated me and said that he thinks this would be the best game of the whole Olympiad!

Towards the end of the tournament, I found out that there was a contest for the best three games, rewarded by the Armenian president Levon Ter Petrosian with 4000, 2000 and 1000 US dollars respectively. I quickly annotated the game — handwritten on paper — and handed it to the coordinator of the contest, the legendary grandmaster Eduard Gufeld. I vividly
remember the scene. Gufeld, who was eating a huge sandwich, used his free hand to take my paper and crumple it while carelessly putting it in one of his pockets.

I did not have big expectations after that episode, but one year later, the results of the contest were announced: my game was awarded with the second prize! I was very pleased, of course, both sentimentally and financially, but was annoyed by a small detail. My aforementioned friend, who was part of the jury, did not award any point to my win! I do not know what made him change his mind, but had he placed it even on the third place in his evaluation, I would have got the first prize!

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 e6 2.g3 b5 3.Bg2 Bb7 4.d4 Nf6 5.0-0 c5 6.Na3 b4 I was familiar with 6...Qb6 and 6...a6 7.Nc4 cxd4 8.Qxd4 d5 9.Nce5 Ne4 9...Be7 was safer, but White would have maintained an edge with 10.a3!? bxa3 Black's delay in development does not allow him to maintain his queenside space advantage. In the event of 10...a5?! 11.axb4 axb4?! 12.Rxa8 Bxa8 13.Bd2 the pawn on b4 would be in doomed, for instance Qa5 14.b3! Followed by Ra1. 11.b3 0-0 12.Bxa3 With excellent play on dark squares and along the a-file. 10.c4 I briefly considered 10.Nxf7!? Kxf7 11.Ne5+ Ke8 12.Bxe4 dxe4 13.Qxd8+ Kxd8 14.Nf7+ Ke8 15.Nxh8 The knight on h8 is trapped and Black will soon have two minor pieces against a rook and one or two pawns. I generally like to play with the minor pieces and frequently sacrifice the exchange, so this line did not appeal to me. Besides, I did not see how I could make use of my rooks. 10...bxc3 10...Bc5 was absolutely obligatory. Black has to develop at any cost, disregarding the tension on d5. 11.Qd3 Qb6
What could White do? AFter 12.Be3 he would have good compensation for his spoiled structure, but probably not more than that. The most interesting continuation is 11...0-0 12.Be3 would yield me a pleasant version of the Catalan. 12.cxd5 Bxf2+? is likely to lead to trouble. 12...Nxf2 13.Rxf2 Bxf2+ 14.Kh1 exd5 15.e3 13.Rxf2 Nxf2 13...Qxf2+ 14.Kh1 threatens Be3 followed by Rf1, trapping the queen, while the knight on e4 is also hanging and Qb5+ is an annoying threat. 14.Qd4
The daring knight is in trouble. In the following lines, one can feel that White is fighting with a material advantage, as part of Black's army is undeveloped. 14...Ne4 14...Nd1 15.dxe6 fxe6 16.Nd3 traps the knight soon. 15.Nc4 Qxd4+ 15...Qc5 16.Be3 does not change much. It actually helps White to develop. 16.Nxd4 Nc5 16...Bxd5 runs into 17.Bxe4 Bxe4 18.Nd6+ winning a piece. 17.Nd6+ Ke7 18.Nxb7 Nxb7 19.dxe6 White will soon have a decisive material advantage.
11.bxc3 f6 12.Rb1 12.Qa4+ justifies Black's concept: Nd7 13.Nxd7 Qxd7 14.Qxd7+ Kxd7 15.c4 Nc3 with better chances for Black. 12.Nd3 Nd7 is not appealing for White, either. 12...fxe5 13.Qxe5 Nc5 When sacrificing the knight, I saw that 13...Bc8 14.Rxb8 Bd6 is refuted by 15.Qxg7 I planned to meet 13...Qd7 with 14.Rxb7!? Qxb7 15.Qxe6+ Be7 15...Qe7 16.Qxd5 leads to disaster along the long diagonal. 16.Ne5 with a decisive attack. 14.Qh5+ I rejected 14.Rxb7 because of Nbd7 14...Nxb7 15.Qxe6+ Qe7 16.Qxd5 followed by Nd4 wins. 15.Rxd7 Qxd7 In fact, with one pawn for the exchange, the better development and strong pressure on light squares, White's advantage is decisive in the technical phase after 16.c4 Bd6 17.Qd4 . 14...Kd7 I planned to meet 14...g6 with 15.Qe5 Rg8 16.Rxb7 Nbd7 17.Qe3 Nxb7 18.Qxe6+ Qe7 19.Qxd5 I thought that 19.Qxg8 would not worke due to Nf6 20.Qh8 0-0-0 21.Bg5 Bg7 , trapping my queen, overlooking the simple 22.Qxh7 19...Nf6 20.Qc6+ Qd7 20...Kf7 21.Ng5+ leads to a similar situation. 21.Ne5 with three pawns for the exchange and strong initiative in both cases. 15.Ne5+ Kc8 15...Kc7 allows 16.Nf7 Qe8 17.Qe5+ unpinning the knight in order to take on h8. 16.Bg5 16.Nf7 was also strong. Qe8 17.c4 I only noticed that 17.Nd6+?? Bxd6 defends the queen. 17...dxc4 18.Rxb7 Nxb7 19.Bf4 followed by Rb1, with similar play as later in the game. 16...g6 Forced since 16...Be7 allows 17.Nf7 Qe8 18.Bxe7 Qxe7 19.Nxh8 17.Qh4 Qe8 17...Qc7 is no improvement in view of 18.Nxg6 Rg8 19.Bf4 18.Bf6 Rg8 19.c4 19.Qxh7 was also good, but I did not wish to deviate my queen so far from the main trajectories. 19.Rxb7 Kxb7 20.c4 might have been a more practical move order, since after Nbd7 21.Nxd7 Qxd7 22.cxd5 exd5 23.Qc4 the win is much simpler. 19...Nbd7 20.Rxb7 I thought that 20.Nxd7 Qxd7 would improve Black's coordination, but after 21.cxd5 Bxd5 22.Rfd1 his position would be hopeless. 20...Nxf6 21.Qxf6 Kxb7 22.cxd5 Kc7 In the event of 22...Ka6 I would have continued 23.Nc6 Planning Qc3 Bg7 24.Qf4 with decisive threats. 23.Rc1 Rb8 24.Nd3 Rb5 25.a4 Ra5 26.Qd4 Qxa4 The point behind 25.a4 was that 26...Qe7 loses to 27.Qb4 After 26...e5 I would have, of course, played 27.d6+ Bxd6 28.Qd5 with a decisive attack. Nimzowitsch' theory about unblocked pawns (the d5-pawn in this case) was long familiar to me. 27.Nxc5 Qxd4 28.Nxe6+ Kb7 29.Nxd4 Bd6 30.Rb1+ Kc7 I was dissapointed that, even in severe time trouble already, my opponent did not fall into the trap 30...Ka8? 31.Nb5 Rb8 32.Nc7+ Bxc7 33.d6+ , winning. I now spent most of my time looking for a forced win, until joining him in the time trouble. Instead of that, I should have just searched for the optimal static setup. White is not worse from material point of view and he should just coordinate his pieces in order to maintain his attack with opposite-coloured bishops. 31.Rc1+ Kb7 32.Rb1+ Kc7 33.Nb5+ 33.Ne6+ was the right way to proceed, leaving the b-file available for the rook's intrusion. Kd7 33...Kc8 is worse: 34.Bh3 Ra2 35.Nd4+ Kd8 36.Rb7 with a decisive attack. 34.Rb7+ Kc8 35.Rxh7 Ra1+ 36.Bf1
White's bishop will be passive for a few moves, but Black does not have the time to organise real counterplay. 36...a5 37.e3 a4 38.Kg2 a3 39.Nd4! This is the right move order. My old analysis went 39.Ba6+ Kb8 40.Nd4 , threatening mate in two, but I overlooked Rc1! planning to meet Nc6+ with ...Rxcc6 and ...a3-a2-a1. White would not have anything better than forcing a eprpetual: 41.Nb5 a2 42.Rb7+ 39...Rc1 With the a-file available for the white rook, this fails to defend. For instance: 40.Nc6 Rxf1 41.Kxf1 Bc5 42.Rh4 winning.
33...Kd7 34.Bh3+ Ke7 35.Nd4 Kf6 35...Rxd5? loses material: 36.Rb7+! In the mutual time trouble we might have calculated only 36.Be6? but this offers Black an unexpected chance: Rb8 37.Rxb8 Rxd4! 36...Kf6 37.Be6 winning, since Rb8 is parried with 38.Bxd5 . After the last move, I understood that things were not clear at all, but decided to try to retrieve my advantage in the mutual time trouble. By the way, we did not have a time increment in those years yet, so time trouble was something genuine. 36.e4 Ra4 37.Rd1 g5 37...Rb8 looks more practical. 38.Bd7 I was already happy about the way my pieces were dancing around at this moment. The last move takes e8 under control with gain of time. You may imagine how disspointed I was when recently discovering that precisely in this moment the database gives a different move order: 38.Rd2 Rc4 Would I really al;low 38...g4 . Not really... 39.Nf5 Be5 40.Nh6 1-0. Actually, with the e8-square available for the rook, this is not entirely clear. 38...Rc4 39.Nf5 Be5 40.Nh6
I played the last move before the control with just few seconds on the clock and rushed out to the rest room, in order to fulfill a dream I had been hosting since the start of the time trouble. On the way there and back, I more or less understood that my position was winning again. Things were even better than I had thought, since in the meanwhile my opponent lost on time, failing to make his 40th move. There might have been a discussion between him and the arbitre, since when I reached the board he was just nervously signing the score sheets, under the observation of the latter. 40.Nh6 White wins material, and maintains his coordination, for instance Rd8 41.Ng4+ Ke7 42.Nxe5 Rxe4 43.d6+ Kf8 44.f4 gxf4 45.gxf4 Rxf4 46.Bh3 Threatening Nc6. Rf6 47.Nd7+
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Marin,M2530Aleksandrov,A25501–01996A46Olympiad-325.2

The aim of these Dvd's is to build a repertoire after 1.c4 and 2.g3 for White. The first DVD includes the systems 1...e5, the Dutch and Indian setups. The second DVD includes the systems with 1...c5, 1...c6 and 1...e6.


Links


GM Mihail Marin, born in 1965, has several times been Romanian champion, played in 12 Olympiads (earning an individual bronze medal in 1988) and first made the leap over the Elo barrier of 2600 in 2001. Marin possesses a rare gift for a grandmaster — he is able to explain in readily comprehensible terms the ideas behind moves, variations and positions. This ability is there for all to admire in his contributions to ChessBase Magazine.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.