Robert Ris: My most memorable game

by Robert Ris
7/18/2020 – Half his life he has spent teaching chess to players of all ages, especially young talents, and his success as a trainer has a lot to do with the fact that he himself was successful in his teens. In his ‘most memorable game’, Robert Ris analyzes the win that gave him tournament victory at the U20 Dutch Open when he was just 14 years old!

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

MMMG #6: Nerve-wracking

Robert Ris was born in Amstelveen, The Netherlands in 1988, and after learning the rules of the game at 7 he managed to get his IM title at 18. By then, however, he had already started passing his knowledge in schools, chess clubs, with private classes and online training. As he states on his official website, “Sharing my experiences with my students is at least as enjoyable and rewarding [as fighting to become a grandmaster]”. 

Focusing on teaching chess made him a great communicator of ideas and a prolific content creator. In fact, he has been presenting his own Fast & Furious show on the PlayChess server since 2012! He has also produced no fewer than fourteen ChessBase DVDs and has authored books for Thinkers Publishing — recently, his “The Modernized Sveshnikov” has been released.

That their trainer is so well-informed helps his students, as noted by one of his pupils:

Robert is an active, passionate player and teacher for the years I’ve known him. The focus of our training was working on my opening repertoire. His precise, in-depth analyzes were very up to date and relevant in practice.

In his most memorable game, Ris takes us through his last-round win at the 2002 Dutch Open.

An enthusiastic coach

Below we present the highlights of the annotations sent by the author. The full analysis can be found in a replayable board at the end of the article.


For my most memorable game I’d like to take you back to my last round game of the Dutch Open U20 in 2002, when I was 14 years old.

In the previous editions of this event I had been doing pretty well, winning the U12 in 1999 and sharing first in 2001 in the U14 category (even though I blew my one-point lead by losing in the last round, which actually brings back some of my most painful chess memories!). The next year I decided to play in the highest youth category, as I thought it would be more challenging playing more experienced youngsters. Being seeded around number 20 by rating, I entered the tournament pretty relaxed, without too many expectations. But once you enter the final round in the shared lead (6.5/8) and your main competitor makes a quick draw, you realise tournament victory is within reach.

I can’t remember I ever felt that amount of pressure during a game! That feeling in combination with the desirable outcome makes it one of those happy chess experiences that I cherish dearly. We are not talking about the quality of play (it isn't the best game), but the entertainment value compensates a lot — at least for me, as a go through this nerve-wracking game almost 18 years later.

Ris, Robert vs. Snuverink, Michiel
U20 Dutch Open - Hengelo, Netherlands
 

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.h3 Re8 9.c3 Bf8 10.d4 d6 11.Nbd2 Na5 12.Bc2 c5 13.Nf1 Bd7 14.Bg5

 

14...Nc4? Missing a little tactical idea, weakening Black's kingside.

15.dxe5! dxe5 16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.b3

 

There are options for White here as well, including ambitious ones, as giving up the pawn on b2 for developing an initiative on the kingside. However, as I didn’t see anything convincing, I decided to play it safe. 

17...Na3 18.Qc1 Nxc2 19.Qxc2 f5!? 20.exf5 Qf6?

 

This is a mistake, as I’m able to keep my extra pawn without allowing any counterplay.

21.Ng3 Bc6 22.Nd2 Qh4 23.Nde4 Bh6 24.Qe2 Not really a bad move, but playing for the trade of pieces (Qg4) is a bit too simplistic and later almost costs me tournament victory.

24...Kh8 25.Nd6 Re7 26.f6 Qxf6 27.Ngf5 Rg8 28.f3?

 

Just awful! Overwhelmed by the pressure (on the clock and the tournament situation), I simply trusted my opponent.

28...Bf4! 29.Nxe7 Qxe7 30.Rad1 Bd7?

 

The bishop was actually quite well placed on the long diagonal, targeting the white king.

31.Qe4! Qf6 32.g4?! The threats along the g-file (and on the h3-pawn) were unbearable.

32...Be6 33.Re2 Qh4 34.Nf5 Qxh3 35.Rg2 h5 36.Rdd2 Bxf5 37.Qxf5 Qxf3??

 

Now I hear myself telling my students: Look at forcing moves first! [37...Be3+!]

38.Qf6+ Rg7 39.Rdf2?? Qe3 40.gxh5 Qe1+ 41.Rf1 Qe3+ 42.Rff2 Bg3??

 

43.Kh1!

I felt relieved to consolidate my king's position and quickly spotted the sequence played in the game.

43...Qe1+ 44.Rf1 Qe4 45.h6 Qxg2+ 46.Kxg2 Bh4+ 47.Kf3??

 

Played instantly, not having seen 47.Qxg7# at all. I can't remember ever to have missed a forced mate twice during one game. The good thing is that I didn’t realize both blunders during the game at all and entered the remaining ending full of confidence.

47...Bxf6 48.hxg7+ Bxg7 49.Ke4 Kg8 50.c4 bxc4 51.bxc4 f6 52.Kd5?

 

I just thought that after picking up the pawn on c5 the game is over, but a much more technical way of converting is to keep the pawns blockaded with the king.

52...Kf7 53.Kxc5 Ke6 54.Kb6 e4 55.c5 f5 56.c6 Be5 57.Re1 Kd5 58.Rd1+ Ke6 59.Re1 Kd5 60.Rc1 Ke6! 61.c7

 

61...Bxc7+ 62.Rxc7 e3 63.Rc8! The only move

63...Kd5 64.Rd8+ Ke4 65.Kc5 f4?

 

The final and decisive blunder. The position is still drawn after [65...e2! 66.Kc4 Ke3 67. Re8+ Kf2 68.Kd4 a5 69.a4 e1=Q 70.Rxe1 Kxe1 71.Ke5 Kd2 72.Kxf5 Kc3 73.Ke4=]

66.Kc4 f3 67.Re8+ Kf4 68.Kd3 e2 69.Kd2 Kg3 70.Ke1 Kf4 71.Kf2 Kg4 72.Re3

1-0


Full annotations

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
For my most memorable game I'd like to take you back to my last round game of the Dutch Open U20 in 2002, when I was 14 years old. In the previous editions of this event I had been doing pretty well, winning the U12 in 1999 and sharing first in 2001 in the U14 category (even though I blew my one-point lead by losing in the last round, which actually brings back some of my most painful chess memories!). The next year I decided to play in the highest youth category, as I thought it would be more challenging playing more experienced youngsters. Being seeded around number 20 by rating, I entered the tournament pretty relaxed, without too many expectations. But once you enter the final round in the shared lead (6.5/8) and your main competitor makes a quick draw, you realise tournament victory is within reach. I can't remember I ever felt that amount of pressure during a game! That feeling in combination with the desirable outcome makes it one of those happy chess experiences that I cherish dearly. We are not talking about the quality of play (it isn't the best game), but the entertainment value compensates a lot — at least for me, as a go through this nerve-wrecking game almost 18 years later. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.h3 Re8 9.c3 Bf8 10.d4 d6 11.Nbd2 Na5 12.Bc2 c5 13.Nf1 Bd7 14.Bg5
14...Nc4? Missing a little tactical idea, weakening Black's kingside. 15.dxe5! dxe5 15...Nxe5 16.Nxe5 Rxe5 is bad, in view of 17.f4 Re8 18.e5 and White wins. 16.Bxf6 gxf6 16...Qxf6 17.Qxd7+- 17.b3?! There are options for White here as well, including ambitious ones, as giving up the pawn on b2 for developing an initiative on the kingside. However, as I didn't see anything convincing, I decided to play it safe. Na3 18.Qc1 Nxc2 19.Qxc2 f5!? I didn't see this one coming. 20.exf5 Qf6? This is a mistake, as I'm able to keep my extra pawn without allowing any counterplay. After 20...e4! 21.Rxe4 Bxf5 22.Rxe8 Bxc2 23.Rxd8 Rxd8 White is better, but Black has some compensation for the pawn. 21.Ng3 Bc6 22.Nd2 Being nowadays a professional trainer, I'm recommending my students to bring all their pieces to the party. Looking back at this game I realize that 22.Re3 intending Rae1 feels more appropriate, but I think that idea didn't cross my mind at that time. 22...Qh4 23.Nde4 Bh6 24.Qe2 Not really bad move, but playing for the trade of pieces (Qg4) is a bit too simplistic and later almost costs me tournament victory. Kh8 25.Nd6 Re7 26.f6 Qxf6 27.Ngf5 Rg8? 27...Rd7 28.Nxh6 followed by Qxe5 had been my idea. 28.f3? Just awful! Overwhelmed by the pressure (on the clock & tournament situation), I simply believe my opponent. However, I could just have played 28.Nxe7! since after Rxg2+ 29.Kf1 there isn't much Black can do, e.g. Qh4 29...Rg1+ 30.Kxg1 Qg5+ 31.Qg4+- 29...Qxe7 30.Qxe5+ Qxe5 31.Nxf7+ Kg7 32.Nxe5+- 30.Qxe5+ Bg7 31.Nxf7# 28...Bf4! 29.Nxe7 Qxe7 30.Rad1 Bd7? The bishop is actually quite well placed at the long diagonal, targetting the white king. Instead, Black should have played 30...Rg6!? when Black retains excellent play for the exchange. The following lines give a nice illustration of Black's dynamical potential: 31.Qd3 31.Nf5 Qg5 and now apparently the knight would have to return to d6, as it isn't very stable on f5. 31...c4 32.bxc4 bxc4 33.Nxc4 Qc5+ 34.Kh1 34.Ne3 Bxf3 is definitely something I would have ever allowed, though after 35.Rd2 White is still holding his position together. 34...Qf2 35.Ne3 Bxe3 36.Re2! Qxf3‼ 37.Qxe3 37.gxf3? Bxf3+ 38.Rg2 38.Kh2 Bf4# 38...Bxg2+ 39.Kh2 Bf4+ 40.Kg1 Be4+ and Black wins. 37...Qxe3 38.Rxe3 Rxg2 39.Red3 which objectively should be about equal, though anything could still happen (especially with the same players under these circumstances!) 31.Qe4! Qf6 31...Bxh3 32.Qxf4! was my idea. 32.g4?! The threats along the g-file (and pawn on h3) were unbearable, though stepping aside with 32.Kf1 without further weakening the kingside is more sound. 32...Be6 Protecting f7. 32...Qh4? 33.Nxf7+ Kg7 34.Rxd7 wins, since after Qg3+ 35.Kf1 Qxh3+ 36.Ke2 Qg2+ 37.Kd1 the checks are over. c4 33.Re2 Qh4 34.Nf5 Qxh3 35.Rg2 h5 36.Rdd2 Bxf5 I was hoping for 36...Bxd2? 37.Rxd2 after which I can bring my rook to the h-file. 37.Qxf5 Qxf3?? Now I hear myself telling my students: LOOK AT FORCING MOVES FIRST! 37...Be3+! when I'm forced to give back the exchange with 38.Rdf2 38.Kf1? Qh1+ 39.Ke2 Bxd2-+ 38.Qf6+ Rg7 38...Kh7 39.Qxf7+ Rg7 40.Qf5+ leads to mate as well. 39.Rdf2?? Don't ask me why I didn't look at 39.Rd8+ Kh7 40.Qf5+ (did I miss this backward queen move?) Rg6 41.Qxf7+ which is leading to mate by force: Rg7 41...Kh6 42.Rh8+ Kg5 43.Rxh5# 42.Qf5+ Rg6 43.Rd7+ Kh8 44.Qf8+ Rg8 45.Qf6+ Rg7 46.Qxg7# Yes, I missed a forced mate, which can happen, of course... :) 39...Qe3 40.gxh5 Qe1+ 41.Rf1 Qe3+ 42.Rff2 A disappointment, but I had to accept a repetition: 42.Kh1? Qh3+ 42...c4 43.Kg1 Qxg2# 42...Bg3?? 42...Qe1+= 43.Kh1! I felt relieved to consolidate my king's position and quickly spotted the sequence played in the game. The immediate 43.h6? doesn't work, since after Bxf2+ 44.Qxf2 Qxf2+ 45.Kxf2 Rxg2+ 46.Kxg2 f5 the pawn ending is lost. 43...Qe1+ 44.Rf1 Qe4 45.h6 Qxg2+ 46.Kxg2 Bh4+ 47.Kf3?? Played instantly, not having seen 47.Qxg7# at all. I can't remember ever to have missed a forced mate twice during one game. The good thing is that I didn't realize both blunders during the game at all and entered the remaining ending full of confidence. 47...Bxf6 48.hxg7+ Bxg7 49.Ke4 Kg8 50.c4 bxc4 51.bxc4 f6 52.Kd5? I just thought that after picking up the pawn on c5 the game is over, but a much more technical way of converting is to keep the pawns blockaded with the king, e.g. 52.Rf3! Kf7 53.Kf5 and the pawn on a6 will be taken next. 52...Kf7 53.Kxc5 Ke6 54.Kb6 e4 55.c5 f5 56.c6 Be5 57.Re1 Trying to stop the pawns from marching. After 57.c7? Bxc7+ 58.Kxc7 Ke5 the two pawns and king are stronger than the rook. 57...Kd5 58.Rd1+ Ke6 I was hoping for 58...Kc4 59.Rc1+ Kd4 60.Rc5! followed by Rxe5. 59.Re1 I was trying to make everything tactically work, but the positional move 59.Rd8! , rook behind the passed pawns, and threatening to take the bishop would be a relatively simple win. 59...Kd5 60.Rc1 Ke6! 60...e3? loses to 61.Rc5+ Ke4 62.Rxe5+ Kxe5 63.c7 e2 64.c8Q e1Q 65.Qe8+ and White wins the queen. 61.c7 61.Kxa6 f4 62.Kb7 e3 63.Re1 Kf5 64.c7 64.a4 Ke4 65.a5 f3 66.c7 Bxc7 67.a6 f2 68.Rh1 e2 69.a7 e1Q 70.a8Q f1Q 71.Rxf1 Qxf1 72.Kxc7+= 64...Bxc7 65.Kxc7 Ke4 66.a4 f3 67.a5 f2 68.Ra1 e2 69.a6 e1Q 70.Rxe1+ fxe1Q 71.a7= and White is in time to secure a draw. Apparently, after 61.Kc5!? White still retains some winning chances, but retreating the king wasn't something I had in my mind. 61...Bxc7+ 62.Rxc7 e3 63.Rc8! The only move. 63.Kxa6? e2 64.Rc1 f4 and Black wins. 63...Kd5 64.Rd8+ Ke4 65.Kc5 f4? The final and decisive blunder. The position is still drawn after 65...e2! 66.Kc4 Ke3 67.Re8+ Kf2 68.Kd4 a5 69.a4 e1Q 69...f4 70.Kd3 f3 71.Kd2= 70.Rxe1 Kxe1 71.Ke5 Kd2 72.Kxf5 Kc3 73.Ke4= 66.Kc4 f3 66...e2 67.Re8+ Kf3 68.Kd3+- 66...Kf3 67.Kd3 Kf2 68.Re8 a5 69.Re4+- 67.Re8+ Kf4 68.Kd3 e2 69.Kd2 Kg3 70.Ke1 Kf4 71.Kf2 Kg4 72.Re3
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ris,R-Snuverink,M-1–02002C96Hengelo U20 op9
Ris,R-Snuverink,M-1–02002C96Hengelo U20 op9

Pattern recognition is an important tool in modern chess, as it helps you to understand better the characteristics of a position. Particularly when you have been confronted with a surprise opening system played by your opponent, it helps when you can just


Links


Robert is an International Master who mostly spends his time training and coaching talented youngsters. On the PlayChess server The Fast and the Furious is a popular show where he explains sharp opening lines for a wider audience. He is also a well-known ChessBase author who produced numerous DVDs and regularly contributes to ChessBase Magazine as well. Since 2015 he is the organizer of the Dutch Rapid Championships in his home town Amstelveen. He has started a YouTube channel with chess analysis as well.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.