Tata Steel Chess: Magnus keeps on drawing

by Antonio Pereira
1/15/2019 – The drawing streak of Magnus Carlsen continues as the World Champion tied his fourth round match-up against Vladimir Kramnik at the Tata Steel Masters. Meanwhile, Anish Giri and Vidit won their games to join Vishy Anand and Ding Liren in the chasing pack half a point behind sole leader Ian Nepomniachtchi. In the Challengers, Vladislav Kovalev beat Lucas van Foreest to seize his spot in the leading group. The action of the day was analysed by GM DANNY KING. | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Twenty-one draws

Usually a long streak of draws has something to do with a player showing a conservative and pragmatic style in order to maintain a stable performance against strong opposition. Magnus Carlsen — who has drawn his last twenty-one classical games — is known for choosing positions that lead to clear setups that allow him to prove his technical prowess. However, he is also praised for his seemingly indestructible fighting spirit. Such a long streak of half points is certainly not something we would expect of the Norwegian.

Certainly the most hotly anticipated match-up of the day | Photo: Alina l'Ami

In his last game, he faced an under-the-weather (chess-wise) Vladimir Kramnik — the Russian, who used to be a difficult rival for Magnus, came from having a lousy start in the tournament. Vlad showed he was up for the task, though, and kept the balance throughout the game despite having the black pieces. Shortly before the time control, Kramnik even gave up a pawn to go into a balanced endgame:

 
Carlsen vs. Kramnik
Position after 36.Ba4

Black could have continued 36...Ne5 37.c4 Nd3 in order to keep the material balance, but Kramnik considered that after 36...Nb6 37.Bxc6 Nxc6 38.Nxc6 Nc4 he had enough compensation for the pawn — and he was right. The game continued until move 56, when the draw was finally signed.

Vladimir gave his first interview in this year's edition and mentioned how he is well aware of the fact that he is perhaps taking too many risks:

I'm an old man, I just want to enjoy chess. [...] I know that I'm risking too much, but that is the way I want to play, and in such a strong tournament it's something that maybe doesn't pay, but at least I have interesting games.

Magnus, on the other hand, is still slowly losing rating points with these draws — Caruana is now exactly three points below him in the live ratings list. Nonetheless, he will play Jorden van Foreest in the next round, a player that has not drawn once in Wijk aan Zee this year.

Big Vlad is never afraid | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Two friends join the chasing pack

In last year's Olympiad, we saw how Vidit Gujrathi has established very good relations with the Dutch team. The same can be said about Twitter, where he and Anish Giri have gone back and forth joking around more than once in the past. Coincidentally, both players won their games on Tuesday and now share second place with Anand and Ding Liren.

Giri lost in round one against Nepomniachtchi, but has bounced back to contention with two victories. His latest win, against Richard Rapport, was achieved with the black pieces, after the Hungarian used an opening system that showed little ambition. When asked about how he prepared to face someone as unpredictable as Richard, Giri explained that it was useful to look at the games of other eccentric players:

I recall looking at the system once when I played Baadur [Jobava], and Richard and Baadur…I don't know if they work together, but certainly they look at each other's games.

Rapport's critical mistake came on move 21, in a position that Giri considered to be completely equal:

 
Rapport vs. Giri
Position after 20...Bf8

The Hungarian played the small combination 21.Nxb6 Qxb6 22.a4, getting back the piece but allowing Black to get an outside passed pawn on the queenside. From this moment on — and especially after the weakening 23.g4 — Giri had the upper hand on both sides of the board. The Dutchman showed good technique and got the point by move 40.

The number one player in the Netherlands | Photo: Alina l'Ami

For Vidit, on the other hand, the win was not as straightforward. The Indian confessed that he felt he was playing against a computer in the opening, as Jorden van Foreest spent less than three minutes on each of his first 31 moves! Clearly, the youngster was expecting to get the opposite-coloured bishop endgame that presented itself on the board, but then he was not able to assess it was necessary to calculate a bit to secure the draw:

 
Vidit vs. Van Foreest
Position after 36.Ke3

The procedure needed to draw the game required Black to keep his bishop on d1, in order to force White's king to stay close defending the e2-pawn or go to the kingside at the expense of his small material advantage. Jorden's 36...Ba4, therefore, was the critical mistake, as Vidit activated his monarch on the kingside and went on to win the game after 51 moves.

Vidit did not think he would win this game | Photo: Alina l'Ami

The rest of the games were drawn, with Teimour Radjabov, Shakhriyar Mamedyarov and Sam Shankland — besides Magnus — adding a fourth half point to their tallies. For Shankland, it has been a good run, given the strength of his opponents, but he certainly could have gotten at least a win, especially when he obtained a favourable position against Rapport. The current U.S. champion talked about his performance so far:


Daily round-up show

GM Daniel King analysed the games from round four


Standings after Round 4 - Masters

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM

1
GM
2783
1

2
GM
2835
½

3
GM
2777
1

4
GM
2817
½

Ø 2803
3/4
2763
3.0
4
2.00
2996
2
GM
GM
2695

1
GM
2738
½

2
GM
2813
½

3
GM
2835
½


Ø 2750
2.5/4
2695
2.5
4
1.50
2845
3
GM
GM
2813

1
GM
2835
½

2
GM
2695
½


4
GM
2724
½

Ø 2717
2.5/4
2813
2.5
4
1.00
2812
4
GM
GM
2773


2
GM
2724
½

3
GM
2725
½

4
GM
2757
½

Ø 2705
2.5/4
2773
2.5
4
1.00
2800
5
GM
GM
2783


2
GM
2777
1

3
GM
2817
½

4
GM
2731
1

Ø 2772
2.5/4
2783
2.5
4
0.50
2867
6
GM

1
GM
2725
½

2
GM
2757
½

3
GM
2783
½


Ø 2757
2/4
2817
2.0
4
2.00
2757
7
GM
GM
2835

1
GM
2813
½


3
GM
2695
½

4
GM
2777
½

Ø 2762
2/4
2835
2.0
4
1.50
2762
8
GM

1
GM
2817
½

2
GM
2731
½

3
GM
2773
½

4
GM
2738
½

Ø 2765
2/4
2725
2.0
4
1.50
2765
9
GM
GM
2738

1
GM
2695
½


3
GM
2724
1

4
GM
2725
½

Ø 2689
2/4
2738
2.0
4
1.00
2689
10
GM

1
GM
2777
½

2
GM
2817
½

3
GM
2731
½

4
GM
2773
½

Ø 2775
2/4
2757
2.0
4
1.00
2775
11
GM
GM
2731

1
GM
2724
½

2
GM
2725
½

3
GM
2757
½

4
GM
2783
0

Ø 2747
1.5/4
2731
1.5
4
1.00
2660
12
GM

1
GM
2731
½

2
GM
2773
½

3
GM
2738
0

4
GM
2813
½

Ø 2764
1.5/4
2724
1.5
4
1.00
2677
13
GM

1
GM
2773
0

2
GM
2738
1

3
GM
2813
0

4
GM
2695
0

Ø 2755
1/4
2612
1.0
4
1.00
2562
14
GM
GM
2777

1
GM
2757
½

2
GM
2783
0


4
GM
2835
½

Ø 2785
1/4
2777
1.0
4
1.00
2592
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Kovalev wins in the Challengers

Six out of seven games finished drawn in the Challengers, although it could have easily been a round with no decisive games. Like his older brother in the Masters, Lucas van Foreest was not able to keep the balance in a theoretically drawn endgame against Vladislav Kovalev. Lucas needed to give up a pawn to get enough counterplay in a tricky rook ending:

 
Kovalev vs. L. van Foreest
Position after 68.Re5

Van Foreest defended his b5-pawn with 68...Kc6?, when 68...h4 was a necessary pawn sacrifice according to the computers. The problem for Black is that White's f-pawn is now too fast, and there is no way for the black king to get the b4-pawn after the black rook sacrifices itself on f8. Kovalev got the point after 79 moves.

13-year-old against 14-year-old — Pragg versus Keymer | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 4 - Challengers

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM

1
GM
2687
½

2
GM
2643
½

3
GM
2500
1

4
GM
2679
½

Ø 2627
2.5/4
2584
2.5
4
2.50
2722
2
GM
GM
2687

1
GM
2584
½


3
GM
2604
½


Ø 2557
2.5/4
2687
2.5
4
2.00
2652
3
GM
GM
2604


2
GM
2650
½

3
GM
2687
½

4
GM
2643
½

Ø 2613
2.5/4
2604
2.5
4
1.50
2708
4
GM
GM
2699


2
GM
2615
½

3
GM
2477
½

4
WGM
2472
½

Ø 2561
2.5/4
2699
2.5
4
1.50
2656
5
GM
GM
2643

1
IM
2470
1

2
GM
2584
½


4
GM
2604
½

Ø 2549
2.5/4
2643
2.5
4
1.00
2644
6
GM

1
GM
2699
0

2
GM
2477
1

3
IM
2470
1

4
GM
2584
½

Ø 2558
2.5/4
2679
2.5
4
0.50
2653
7
GM

1
GM
2615
½

2
WGM
2472
½

3
GM
2650
1

4
GM
2687
0

Ø 2606
2/4
2502
2.0
4
1.50
2606
8
GM
GM
2615

1
GM
2502
½

2
GM
2699
½

3
WGM
2472
½

4
GM
2650
½

Ø 2581
2/4
2615
2.0
4
1.50
2581
9
GM
GM
2650


2
GM
2604
½


4
GM
2615
½

Ø 2565
2/4
2650
2.0
4
1.00
2565
10
GM
GM
2500

1
GM
2477
½

2
IM
2470
1

3
GM
2584
0


Ø 2518
2/4
2500
2.0
4
0.00
2518
11
GM

1
GM
2650
0

2
GM
2687
½

3
GM
2643
½

4
GM
2500
½

Ø 2620
1.5/4
2539
1.5
4
1.50
2533
12
WGM

1
GM
2604
0

2
GM
2502
½

3
GM
2615
½

4
GM
2699
½

Ø 2605
1.5/4
2472
1.5
4
1.50
2518
13
GM
GM
2477

1
GM
2500
½


3
GM
2699
½

4
IM
2470
½

Ø 2587
1.5/4
2477
1.5
4
1.00
2500
14
IM
IM
2470

1
GM
2643
0

2
GM
2500
0


4
GM
2477
½

Ø 2575
0.5/4
2470
0.5
4
0.00
2253
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Challengers 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.