Tata Steel Chess: Giri and Van Foreest bounce back

by Antonio Pereira
1/14/2019 – It was a good day for the locals in the Tata Steel Masters, as both Dutch participants recovered from their first round losses — Anish Giri got a third win in a row against Vladimir Kramnik and Jorden van Foreest defeated Jan-Krzysztof Duda with the black pieces after surviving a complicated time scramble. In the Challengers, young Vincent Keymer joined the leaders thanks to a win over Stefan Kuipers. GM DANIEL KING provides expert analyses of all the action. | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Home (dis)advantage

While playing at home is a clear advantage in other sports, chess players do not always find this as a preferable circumstance. Magnus Carlsen, for example, has won the Norway Chess supertournament only once — by his standards, this might be seen as a subpar performance — and has posted two disappointing results in 2015 and 2017. Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, on the other hand, won Shamkir Chess two years in a row (precisely when Magnus was not playing). In any case, some players regard the support they receive at home as an incentive while others feel that it creates unwanted extra pressure.

For Anish Giri and Jorden van Foreest, the start of this year's Tata Steel Masters was more like a rollercoaster ride. Only time will tell if playing in the Netherlands this time around works for or against them.

Giri was Kramnik's second at the Berlin Candidates Tournament | Photo: Alina l'Ami

In round two, Anish had the black pieces against his former nemesis Vladimir Kramnik — he had lost seven games in a row, not counting draws, in classical chess before beating the former World Champion twice in 2018 (first in Wijk aan Zee and then in Dortmund). The witty Dutchman declared afterwards that while he had played against Nepomniachtchi as a "drunk Tal" in round one, his round two performance was reminicient of a "drunk Petrosian".

The opening and early middlegame left Kramnik in a favourable position until he played what Giri considered to be a wrong pawn move:

 
Kramnik vs. Giri
Position after 18...Ng6

Anish — and the computers — thought that this was the right time to go 19.g3, while Vlad's 19.e5 allowed Giri to offer an exchange sacrifice á la Petrosian after 19...b6 20.Bf3 Ba6. The Russian could have taken the material a couple of moves later, but instead chose to keep his bishop to protect the light squares. Coincidentally, moving his pawn to g3 three moves later was a critical misstep:

 
Position after 21...c5

Giri felt that 22.Bxa8 was the right move here, albeit Black has enough compensation. However, Kramnik's 22.g3? allowed Anish to coordinate his pieces. White's expansion in the centre only weakened his pawns and left him material down before the time control. On move 42, Kramnik finally gave up.

This was Giri's third straight win over Kramnik. When asked about the reason for this shift in their personal record, Anish gave a straightforward answer:

I think it has mostly to do with the fact that his level clearly dropped. [...] Basically today it was in his hands, he could have won it...back in the day he would win it, go g3 instead of e5.

Meanwhile, Jorden van Foreest used the same weapon Vishy Anand had used to defeat him on Saturday to beat Jan-Krzysztof Duda: the Caro-Kann Defence. The young Polish grandmaster had the initiative on the kingside and was looking to create a direct attack against Black's king, but then played too ambitiously and was overtaken by Jorden's counterattack:

 
Duda vs. Van Foreest
Position after 45.Rxd4

White does have a pawn on h6 and his queen is always threatening to infiltrate. Nonetheless, Duda never had a chance to make anything of it and, after a wild time scramble, Black was left with this completely winning position. Van Foreest captured with 45...Nxg3 and went on to comfortably force his opponent's resignation five moves later.

A rather coincidental slip of the tongue by Jorden in the post-game interview reminded us that all four decisive games in the Masters favoured the player with the black pieces: "It's just a great feeling, and it's good to bounce black..." The 19-year-old quickly corrected his slight mistake, while expressing joy after getting his first ever victory in the main event of the traditional tournament.

Duda

Duda had a good position but could not break through | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Different ways to draw

Probably the most anticipated match-up of round two was Magnus Carlsen versus Ian Nepomniachtchi. The Norwegian has never beaten "Nepo" in a classical game and tried to go for it against his friend with an exchange sacrifice, which according to the defending champion "was supposed to be playable". A succinct description of the game was given by Carlsen, who said that like his encounter against Ding this one was "brief but exciting". 

For Nepomniachtchi, it was tough to kick off the event with two black games against last year's best performers in Wijk aan Zee. However, he still leads the competition together with Vishy Anand. It was undoubtedly a promising start for the Russian. 

Nepo and Magnus

Two good friends sharing some laughs | Photo: Alina l'Ami

The biggest escape of the day was achieved by Richard Rapport, who held an inferior position against Sam Shankland until signing a 95-move draw. Compatriots Shakhriyar Mamedyarov and Teimour Radjabov drew after 32 moves, while Anand vs Fedoseev and Ding Lirev vs Vidit lasted 33 and 34 moves, respectively.

Rapport grimace

Rapport fought hard to salvage half a point | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Anand

Vishy is still sharing the lead with Nepomniachtchi | Photo: Alina l'Ami


Daily round-up show

GM Daniel King analysed the games of round two for almost an hour 


Standings after Round 2 - Masters

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
2773
1.5
2
1.50
2861
2
2763
1.5
2
1.50
3002
3
2725
1.0
2
1.00
2774
4
2835
1.0
2
1.00
2788
5
2817
1.0
2
1.00
2741
6
2813
1.0
2
1.00
2765
7
2731
1.0
2
1.00
2725
8
2724
1.0
2
1.00
2752
9
2757
1.0
2
0.50
2797
10
2695
1.0
2
0.50
2776
11
2783
1.0
2
0.00
2770
12
2612
1.0
2
0.00
2756
13
2777
0.5
2
0.50
2577
14
2738
0.5
2
0.50
2461
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Keymer joins the leaders in the Challengers

Just like Giri and Van Foreest in the Masters section, Parham Maghsoodloo recovered from a loss on Saturday by defeating German IM Elisabeth Paehtz. 

The only other German participant — besides Paehtz — got a convincing victory to become the fifth co-leader in the Challengers tournament. Vincent Keymer showed great preparation to beat Stefan Kuipers in a 34-move game. The final position illustrates how White dominated his opponent positionally right from the get-go:

 
Keymer vs. Kuipers
Position after 34.Bb6

So the youngsters came back in round two. For Maghsoodloo, it might be time to take advantage of Kuiper's disastrous start — he lost both his games so far — as he will face the Dutchman with the black pieces on Monday.

playing hall

Always a huge chess celebration in Wijk aan Zee | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 2 - Challengers

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
2699
1.5
2
1.50
2840
2
2650
1.5
2
0.50
2765
3
2604
1.5
2
0.50
2754
4
2643
1.5
2
0.50
2720
5
2500
1.5
2
0.00
2667
6
2615
1.0
2
1.00
2601
7
2584
1.0
2
1.00
2665
8
2687
1.0
2
0.50
2562
9
2502
1.0
2
0.50
2544
10
2679
1.0
2
0.00
2588
11
2539
0.5
2
0.50
2476
12
2477
0.5
2
0.50
2397
13
2472
0.5
2
0.50
2360
14
2470
0.0
2
0.00
1772
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Challengers 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.