Tata Steel Chess: Anand and Nepo win, Kramnik escapes

by Antonio Pereira
1/12/2019 – The elite chess season of 2019 took off on Saturday with the first round of the Tata Steel Masters. Seven fighting games left Vishy Anand and Ian Nepomniachtchi as co-leaders, after the rest of the encounters finished drawn. The biggest escape of the day was achieved by Vladimir Kramnik, who could not be taken down by Teimour Radjabov. Meanwhile, in the Challengers, experience got the better of youth, as Anton Korobov and Evgeny Bareev defeated their much younger colleagues to join a four-player leading pack. Expert analysis by GM ADHIBAN BASKARAN and IM MERIJN VAN DELFT. | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

No quick draws

Wijk aan Zee received a large mix of well-established, promising and veteran players at the 81st edition of the traditional Dutch event. An even larger group of amateurs filled the playing hall and recreated the atmosphere that customarily opens the chess season every year. Most of the eyes were, naturally, on the Masters tournament, and the protagonists did not let their fans down — fighting struggles were seen on all boards.

At the very outset of the event, we saw the first surprise, as six-time defending champion Magnus Carlsen was faced with a novelty on move five, courtesy of Ding Liren. The Norwegian confessed that for him the surprise arrived even earlier, given the fact that he did not expect Ding to play 1.Nf3, 2.g3. Soon enough, he gave up an exchange for compensation but, as he mentioned in the post-game interview, in the subsequent fight he "was the one that was always kind of fighting for my life".

It is not a simple task to defeat the World Champion, though, and Magnus pretty much closed the deal by going into an attractive forcing line that led to a draw:

 
Ding Liren vs. Carlsen
Position after 27.Rxf1

Magnus took two minutes to decide on 27...Rxf3 and after 28.Nxf3 e4 29.Qe3 Nxf3+ 30.Rxf3 Qxf3 31.Qxf3 exf3 32.Kf2 the players signed a draw in a completely equal opposite-coloured bishop position. (You can move the pieces yourself on the diagram above!)

The six-time champion strolling in the playing hall | Photo: Alina l'Ami

The Norwegian defending champion tied in points last year with local hero Anish Giri, but the Dutchman had a rough start in this edition, as he lost in only 26 moves against Ian Nepomniachtchi's Pirc Defence. Giri was already in trouble with the white pieces, but when he gave up a piece there was not much more to play for:

 
Giri vs. Nepomniachtchi
Position after 17...b4

Anish could only play the ugly 18.Nb1 to maintain some hopes, but instead gave up the knight with 18.exf5? and resigned the game only eight moves later. Nepomniachtchi talked about his opponent's decision later on:


Giri 0-1 Nepomniachtchi analysed by GM Adhiban Baskaran

Anish Giri would be happy to repeat his triumph from last year and to become the next legend of the Dutch chess, while Nepo was returning to Wijk aan Zee after a hiatus of one year. The score between them was equal though the last win was registered by Anish in the 2017 edition. And with Nepo you can always be sure that the game will always be entertaining!

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 d6 An interesting choice by Nepo to avoid mainstream theory which is Anish's forte! The only other winner of this round was 1...c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 cxd5 4.Bd3 Nf6 5.c3 Qc7 6.h3 g6 7.Nf3 Bf5 8.Ne5 Nc6 9.Bf4 Qb6 10.Bxf5 gxf5 11.Nd3 e6 12.Nd2 Rg8 13.0-0 0-0-0 14.a4 Ne4 15.Rc1 Bd6 16.Bxd6 Nxd6 17.b4 Kb8 18.Qe2 Qc7 19.Qe3 Ne7 20.f3 Ng6 21.Ne5 f4 22.Qe1 Nf5 23.Nxg6 Rxg6 24.Rf2 Rdg8 25.c4 Ne3 26.cxd5 Nxg2 27.Qe5 Qxe5 28.dxe5 Ne1+ 0-1 (28) Van Foreest,J (2612)-Anand,V (2773) Wijk aan Zee NED 2019 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 The fabled Pirc Defence! 4.Be3 a6 5.Qd2 b5 6.f3 This has never occured in the practice of Giri, while Nepo has some experience in this system trying out couple of ideas in shorter formats. Nbd7 6...Bb7 is premature and was convincingly met by 7.a4! b4 8.Nd1 a5 9.c3 Na6 (Fressinet-Nepomniachtchi W Blitz Berlin 2015) 10.Nf2± 6...Bg7 7.h4 7.Bh6 Bxh6 8.Qxh6 Nbd7 7.a4 b4 8.Nd1 0-0 8...a5 9.c3 9.Qxb4 c5 10.dxc5 Nc6 11.Qd2 d5 12.Nf2 Rb8 13.Rb1 7...h5 8.Nh3 8.a4!? b4 9.Nd1 0-0! 10.Qxb4 10.Bd3 c5! 11.dxc5 Nc6 12.Ne2 dxc5 13.Bxc5 Nd7 with good compensation for the pawn. 10...c5 with active play for the pawn. 8...Bxh3 9.Rxh3 Nbd7 10.0-0-0 Nb6 (Leko-Nepomniachtchi Rapid Beijing CHN 2014) Better was 10...c6!? 11.Bd3 Qc7 followed by c5 with a good game. 11.Bd3± 6...b4 is even more premature than Bb7 :). 7.Nd1 a5 8.a3! bxa3 9.Rxa3 c6 10.Bd3 Bg7 11.Ne2 0-0 the simple 12.0-0 offered a clear advantage. Comp likes the greedy 12.b4 winning the a-pawn. 7.0-0-0 Nb6 8.g4 Morozevich chose 8.h4!? b4 9.Nb1 a5 with a complex battle. 10.g4 10.Nh3!? offered better chances to fight for advantage. Comp's insane preference is 10.c4!? bxc3 11.Nxc3 10...h5! A typical idea to fight against the expansion. 11.g5 Nfd7 Black was already superior in (Moro-Zvjaginsev Rapid 2018) 8...Bb7 Nepo missed an interesting possibility in form of 8...h5! 9.g5 9.e5 Nfd5 10.Nxd5 Nxd5 with a nice position for Black. 9.gxh5 Nxh5 now Black can focus on the queenside. 9...Nfd7 10.f4 Bg7 11.f5 gxf5 12.Nh3 12.exf5 doesn't work due to Bb7 13.d5 b4 12...b4 13.Nd5 fxe4 14.Nxb4 Nf8 Black comes out slightly better out of the mess. 9.Nh3 9.a3 was better although Black could continue in the same spirit with h5! 9...Nfd7 10.Be2 e6 I wonder if this move is really required. 10...b4 11.Nb1 a5 was a better way to fight for the intiative. 11.Bg5 More to the point was 11.Nf2 though Black is completely fine after b4 12.Nb1 a5 11...Be7 12.Qe3 Slowly White is losing track. Bxg5 Once again 12...b4! was stronger. 13.Nb1 h5!? with better position. 13.Nxg5 h6 14.Nh3 Qh4 15.Nf2 0-0-0 Now we have an equal position according to comp, although I feel black's position is easier to handle as he has more potential to create something. 16.f4 A huge error. 16.Nd3 was better maintaining the balance, though Black can fight for something with f5!? Also possible is the dark-squared positional approach with 16...e5 17.d5 Qg5 18.Qd2 with equal endgame. 16...f5! White's over extended pawn structure start to feel the heat! 17.Bf3 b4 18.exf5 Desperation. 18.Nb1 fxe4 here both 19.Nxe4 and 19.Bxe4 Bxe4 20.Nxe4 Qxg4 19...Nd5 looks pretty hopeless for White. 18...bxc3 19.fxe6 cxb2+ 20.Kb1 Nf6 White doesn't have enough compensation... 21.Bxb7+ Kxb7 22.Qf3+ d5 23.Nd3 Ne4 24.Nc5+ Ka7 25.Qa3 Nxc5 26.Qxc5 Kb7 An important win for Nepo putting him and Vishy tied for the first spot...although the middlegame phase could have been played better by both the "Masters"! 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Nepomniachtchi,I27630–12019B0781st Tata Steel GpA1

The Modern Pirc is actually a mixture of the Caro-Kann and the Pirc. In many lines Black combines the ideas of the classical Pirc in which the fianchettoed bishop is important with the Caro-Kann idea to fight for the center with c6-d5.


The other winner of the round was five-time Wijk aan Zee champion Vishy Anand, who showed lowest-rated Jorden van Foreest how hard it will be for him to face such a strong field by beating him in 28 moves with Black from a Caro-Kann Defence. When Fiona Steil-Antoni talked to Vishy afterwards, she pointed out that players have been getting good positions with Black lately — referring to the fact that he and Nepo had won with the black pieces. A level-headed Vishy answered pragmatically:

There are only two colours in chess, and there will be a trend this way and there will be a trend that way. I think this is essentially meaningless, these trends.

Anand

A smiling Vishy after a good start | Photo: Alina l'Ami

While Anand started off on the right foot, his old-time friend and rival Vladimir Kramnik was suffering against Teimour Radjabov. The Azeri got a space advantage on the queenside and put pressure on Big Vlad until the Russian found himself in a clearly worse position. Kramnik kept on fighting, though, and his efforts paid off on the last move before the time control:

 
Radjabov vs. Kramnik
Position after 39...Ra4

A quiet move like 40.Rc1 or 40.Rb1 would have kept White's advantage, while after 40.Rxa4? Black got an active queen and managed to create a triple repetition. Draw.

Radjabov

Radjabov was very close to victory | Photo: Alina l'Ami

The rest of the games were more balanced, but debutants Fedoseev, Duda and Shankland were the ones pushing in their games against Rapport, Vidit and Mamedyarov.


Daily round-up show

IM Merijn van Delft analyses the games from the venue itself 


Standings after Round 1 - Masters

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM
GM
2773


Ø 2612
1/1
2773
1.0
1
0.00
3412
2
GM
2763
1.0
1
0.00
3583
3
GM
GM
2835

1
GM
2813
½

Ø 2813
0.5/1
2835
0.5
1
0.50
2813
4
GM

1
GM
2725
½

Ø 2725
0.5/1
2817
0.5
1
0.50
2725
5
GM
GM
2813

1
GM
2835
½

Ø 2835
0.5/1
2813
0.5
1
0.50
2835
6
GM
GM
2777

1
GM
2757
½

Ø 2757
0.5/1
2777
0.5
1
0.50
2757
7
GM

1
GM
2777
½

Ø 2777
0.5/1
2757
0.5
1
0.50
2777
8
GM
GM
2738

1
GM
2695
½

Ø 2695
0.5/1
2738
0.5
1
0.50
2695
9
GM
GM
2731

1
GM
2724
½

Ø 2724
0.5/1
2731
0.5
1
0.50
2724
10
GM

1
GM
2817
½

Ø 2817
0.5/1
2725
0.5
1
0.50
2817
11
GM

1
GM
2731
½

Ø 2731
0.5/1
2724
0.5
1
0.50
2731
12
GM
GM
2695

1
GM
2738
½

Ø 2738
0.5/1
2695
0.5
1
0.50
2738
13
GM
GM
2783


Ø 2763
0/1
2783
0.0
1
0.00
1963
14
GM

1
GM
2773
0

Ø 2773
0/1
2612
0.0
1
0.00
1973
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Experience beats youth in the Challengers 

Three out of four winners in the first round of the Tata Steel Challengers obtained victories with the black pieces — it should just be a coincidence, according to Vishy! 

In the four-player leading pack, we find Evgeny Bareev who, at 52, defeated the youngest participant of the event, 13-year-old Indian prodigy Praggnanandhaa. The Russian-born veteran now represents Canada, and he actually won the event sixteen years ago, before Pragg was even born!

The youngest against the oldest in the Challengers | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Anton Korobov is almost twenty years younger than Bareev but can also be considered a veteran next to the current Junior World Champion Parham Maghsoodloo. The ambitious Iranian youngster allowed Anton to give mate on the board:

 
Maghsoodloo vs. Korobov
Position after 38.Qf5

38...Qxh2#.

Besides Bareev and Korobov, Dutchman Erwin l'Ami and Russian 22-year-old Maksim Chigaev started with wins on the first day.

Korobov tends to start well in Wijk aan Zee | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 1 - Challengers

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM
GM
2699


Ø 2679
1/1
2699
1.0
1
0.00
3479
2
GM
GM
2650


Ø 2539
1/1
2650
1.0
1
0.00
3339
3
GM
GM
2643

1
IM
2470
1

Ø 2470
1/1
2643
1.0
1
0.00
3270
4
GM
GM
2604


Ø 2472
1/1
2604
1.0
1
0.00
3272
5
GM
GM
2687

1
GM
2584
½

Ø 2584
0.5/1
2687
0.5
1
0.50
2584
6
GM
GM
2615

1
GM
2502
½

Ø 2502
0.5/1
2615
0.5
1
0.50
2502
7
GM

1
GM
2687
½

Ø 2687
0.5/1
2584
0.5
1
0.50
2687
8
GM

1
GM
2615
½

Ø 2615
0.5/1
2502
0.5
1
0.50
2615
9
GM
GM
2500

1
GM
2477
½

Ø 2477
0.5/1
2500
0.5
1
0.50
2477
10
GM
GM
2477

1
GM
2500
½

Ø 2500
0.5/1
2477
0.5
1
0.50
2500
11
GM

1
GM
2699
0

Ø 2699
0/1
2679
0.0
1
0.00
1899
12
GM
2539
0.0
1
0.00
1850
13
WGM

1
GM
2604
0

Ø 2604
0/1
2472
0.0
1
0.00
1804
14
IM
IM
2470

1
GM
2643
0

Ø 2643
0/1
2470
0.0
1
0.00
1843
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Challengers 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.