Tata Steel Chess: Nepomniachtchi grabs the lead

by Antonio Pereira
1/14/2019 – Ian Nepomniachtchi is now the sole leader at the 81st edition of the Tata Steel Masters after knocking down Vladimir Kramnik's Berlin wall in the third round of the competition. Ding Liren beat Jorden van Foreest with the black pieces and now shares second place with Vishy Anand. In the Challengers, Andrey Esipenko and Parham Maghsoodloo won in round three to join the pack of co-leaders on 2/3. Expert analysis by DANIEL FERNANDEZ and DANNY KING. | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

A dream start

When Ian Nepomniactchi picked number eight during the drawing of lots of this year's edition he knew he would have to face Giri, Carlsen and Kramnik in consecutive rounds to kick off the first elite tournament of the year — and he was Black in two of these games! Probably a 50% performance by round three would have been enough to keep him hopeful before facing some nominally weaker players. Instead, he is now the sole leader of the event on 2½/3.

His victory over Kramnik increased his live rating up to 2774.5, a career best for the 28-year-old Russian. His peak official rating was 2768, in August 2018, as you can see yourself at Ian's personal page in our playerbase.

Peter Leko kicked off the round in traditional style | Photo: Alina l'Ami

On Monday's game he played the 5.Re1 line against the Berlin, a safe continuation that is "relatively new" (Nepomniachtchi) against Kramnik's weapon of choice. Vlad went for a variation with 13...b6, when 13...c6 had been chosen by Radjabov and Caruana recently. White had some pressure, but it was not necessary for Kramnik to just give up a bishop for a knight in the middlegame:

 
Nepomniachtchi vs. Kramnik
Position after 20.Bc4

Although there is nothing concrete immediately for White, Black's 20...Bxc3 "didn't seem like a good move" (Nepo), as White will keep pushing with his pair of bishops and an active rook. The former World Champion kept looking for ingenuous ways to get counterplay instead of going for a passive defence, but Ian did not falter and took advantage of his rival's adventurous play to get the point after 36 moves.

After miraculously saving a draw against Radjabov in round one, Kramnik lost two in a row and must face none other than Magnus Carlsen with the black pieces on Tuesday. As Alina l'Ami posted on Twitter, Big Vlad even needed to replace his glasses, as the old ones broke during round two. Nonetheless, it would not be a big surprise if Kramnik bounces back with some brilliant games in the rest of the tournament.

Focus | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Black is OK

Nepo's win was the first one with White in the Masters. Normal serve was seen on the rest of the boards, however — Ding Liren and Jan-Krzysztof Duda had Black and won their games in round three.

For the Chinese, it was not hard to remember his preparation in his game against Jorden van Foreest, as they followed the line that he played against Vachier-Lagrave during the last edition of the Shenzhen Masters — yes, the game that MVL won to stop Ding's amazing undefeated streak. The Chinese player showed confident play in the middlegame and got a clearly superior position, but Van Foreest defended tenaciously:

 
Van Foreest vs. Ding Liren
Position after 38...c6

Black is better, but a move like 39.a4 or 39.fxe4+ would have given White more chances to keep the fight alive. Instead, 39.b4 eased Ding's task, and the current number four in the ratings list finally got the win after 50 moves.

Ding Liren showed his strength | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Meanwhile, Duda had to face someone he considers to be a particularly difficult opponent, Vladimir Fedoseev. The Russian used his customary aggressive style and found himself unable to castle soon in the game. Duda started pushing, but Fedoseev seemed to have things under control, until he collapsed around move 25. In the final position, the Polish grandmaster had mate-in-four:

 
Fedoseev vs. Duda
Position after 36.Kh4

One of the reasons Duda finds it difficult to play against Fedoseev is his ability to keep a “poker face”, as he mentioned in the post-game interview. He recounted how even with forced mate on the board, Vladimir kept his cool and did not show any emotion.

A relieved Jan-Krzysztof Duda | Photo: Alina l'Ami

A long draw keeps a long streak alive

Magnus Carlsen drew his third game in Wijk aan Zee and, with it, he has now accumulated twenty straight draws in classical chess. His rival today, 24-year-old Vidit, had to suffer until move 131 from a 4 v 3 rook endgame with pawns on the same flank. During six and a half hours Magnus tried to break his streak of half points.

Given Magnus’ stratospheric rating, the streak of draws only brings world's number two Fabiano Caruana closer to him in the world rankings — the American is now 3.8 points away from the World Champion.

Six hours into the game | Photo: Alina l'Ami

The rest of the games also finished in draws, with Shakhriyar Mamedyarov showing great preparation in the Gruenfeld against Giri. Anish talked about how bad things have gone for him so far in the openings, and about how this is a normal sort of coincidence at the top level:


All Masters games analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 b6 The main interesting thing about this move is that it isn't ...c5. 7.Bd3 7.cxd5 This appears natural, but it transpires that ...b6 isn't that much of a concession in and of itself. Nxd5 7...exd5 is also played, but I believe the knight on c3 to do more work than its equivalent on f6, not least because of the a5-e1 diagonal. 8.Ne5 8.Nxd5 Qxd5 Perhaps cleaner than 8...exd5 9.Bd3 c5 when White can choose his structure: sensible seems 10.Ne5 with slightly better co-ordination. 9.a3 Bd6 10.Bxd6 cxd6 11.Rc1= 7...dxc4 8.Bxc4 Ba6 9.Bxa6 Nxa6 10.Qa4 At this point, White decided to control c6 rather than e4 with the queen- it isn't feasible to do both. 10.Qe2!? Qc8 11.0-0 c5 12.e4 cxd4 13.Nxd4 probably peters out after a timely minor-piece exchange from Black, but he has to set it up first. Qb7?! 13...Rd8 seems a better way to prepare ...Nd5 14.Rad1 14.e5 Nd5 15.Nxd5 Qxd5 16.Nb5 14...Rfd8 15.Bg5 h6 16.Bh4 Rd7 17.Ndb5 Rad8 18.Rxd7 Rxd7 19.e5 Ne8 20.Bxe7 Rxe7= Kuljasevic,D-Dragnev,V Le Castella 2018 10...Qc8 10...Nb4 11.0-0 Qe8!= is the computer's suggestion, when it is plausible that Black is trying to be better as well. 11.0-0 c5 12.Rac1 Qb7 13.a3 Preparing to restrict the a6-knight further. Rfc8 13...Nd5 14.Nxd5 exd5 15.Qb5 isn't the minor-piece trade Black is looking for: the hanging pawns are a little clunky right now. 13...Nc7!? seems a good bet for equality, setting up ...Ncd5 unless White ventures 14.e4!? a6! when White's centre is under enough pressure from ...b5-b4 and ...Nb5 ideas to nearly necessitate 15.dxc5 bxc5 16.Bxc7 Qxc7 14.Nb5 Now it seems to me that White has a small something. Nb8 15.dxc5 bxc5 16.Ne5 16.Nd6 Bxd6 17.Bxd6 Nbd7 18.Ne5 White's bishop is, by a small margin, the best minor piece on the board; it seems to me that he can probably press. 16...Nbd7 17.Nxd7 Now on 17.Nd6 Bxd6 18.Nxd7 there follows Bxf4 18...Be7?! 19.Bg5 Qxb2 20.Bxf6 19.Nxf6+ gxf6 20.Qxf4 Qxb2! and White has no more than a draw. 17...Qxd7 18.Rfd1 Qc6?! 18...Qb7 maintained equality because after 19.Bd6? there is a6! 19.Bd6 Qb7 19...a6 20.Rxc5! axb5 21.Rxc6 bxa4 22.Rxc8+ Rxc8 23.Bxe7 Nd5 24.Bd6 is an unlosable endgame for White, and a slightly treacherous one for Black. 20.Be5 20.Bxe7 Qxe7 21.h3 kept a slight plus due to pawn structure. 20...Nd5 21.Qg4 g6 22.e4 Now the pieces are sucked off the board as if by magic. Qxb5 22...Ne3 23.fxe3 Qxb5 was mildly ambitious and maybe worth a punt if Black was very keen to play a game. 23.exd5 exd5 24.Rxd5 Rd8 25.Rcd1 Rxd5 26.Rxd5 Qc6 27.Qd1 Re8 28.Bc3 Bf6 29.Rd6 Qxd6 30.Qxd6 Rd8 31.Qa6 31.Qxd8+ Bxd8 32.Kf1 is only optically better: with the king on c6 Black holds with ease. 31...Rd1+ 32.Qf1 Rxf1+ 33.Kxf1 Bxc3 34.bxc3 Kf8 35.Ke2 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Shankland,S-Anand,V-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters 3
Radjabov,T-Rapport,R-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters3
Fedoseev,V-Duda,J-0–12019Tata Steel Masters3
Vidit,S-Carlsen,M-½–½2019E64Tata Steel Masters3
Nepomniachtchi,I-Kramnik,V-1–02019C67Tata Steel Masters3
Giri,A-Mamedyarov,S-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters3
Van Foreest,J-Ding,L-0–12019Tata Steel Masters3

Daily round-up show

GM Daniel King analysed the games from round three


Standings after Round 3 - Masters

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM

1
GM
2783
1

2
GM
2835
½

3
GM
2777
1

Ø 2798
2.5/3
2763
2.5
3
1.50
3071
2
GM
GM
2813

1
GM
2835
½

2
GM
2695
½


Ø 2714
2/3
2813
2.0
3
1.00
2839
3
GM
GM
2773


2
GM
2724
½

3
GM
2725
½

Ø 2687
2/3
2773
2.0
3
0.50
2812
4
GM
GM
2835

1
GM
2813
½


3
GM
2695
½

Ø 2757
1.5/3
2835
1.5
3
1.50
2757
5
GM

1
GM
2725
½

2
GM
2757
½

3
GM
2783
½

Ø 2755
1.5/3
2817
1.5
3
1.50
2755
6
GM

1
GM
2817
½

2
GM
2731
½

3
GM
2773
½

Ø 2774
1.5/3
2725
1.5
3
1.50
2774
7
GM
GM
2695

1
GM
2738
½

2
GM
2813
½

3
GM
2835
½

Ø 2795
1.5/3
2695
1.5
3
1.50
2795
8
GM
GM
2731

1
GM
2724
½

2
GM
2725
½

3
GM
2757
½

Ø 2735
1.5/3
2731
1.5
3
1.00
2735
9
GM

1
GM
2777
½

2
GM
2817
½

3
GM
2731
½

Ø 2775
1.5/3
2757
1.5
3
1.00
2775
10
GM
GM
2783


2
GM
2777
1

3
GM
2817
½

Ø 2786
1.5/3
2783
1.5
3
0.50
2786
11
GM
GM
2738

1
GM
2695
½


3
GM
2724
1

Ø 2677
1.5/3
2738
1.5
3
0.50
2677
12
GM

1
GM
2773
0

2
GM
2738
1

3
GM
2813
0

Ø 2775
1/3
2612
1.0
3
1.00
2650
13
GM

1
GM
2731
½

2
GM
2773
½

3
GM
2738
0

Ø 2747
1/3
2724
1.0
3
1.00
2622
14
GM
GM
2777

1
GM
2757
½

2
GM
2783
0


Ø 2768
0.5/3
2777
0.5
3
0.50
2495
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Esipenko and Maghsoodloo are the new co-leaders

While in the Masters no less than six players have drawn all their games so far, in the Challengers only Vladislav Kovalev and Benjamin Gledura have split points three times in this year's edition. Nevertheless, no one in the "B group" has managed to take the sole lead like Nepomniachtchi did in the main event.

Andrey Esipenko is only 16 years old but already looks set to be one of Russia’s leading players in the future. In round three, he defeated the even younger Vincent Keymer in an old-style Sicilian battle with both players going for the throat on opposite sides of the board:

 
Esipenko vs. Keymer
Position after 35...Kh8

Evidently, White won the attacking race, as his bishop on b4 worked as a great shield for the king on the b-file. Esipenko already has mate-in-nine on the board and quickly played the decisive 36.Qxb5. Keymer resigned after 36...Rxb5 37.Rd8 Qe4+ 38.Ka1 (you can try more variations on the diagram above!)

Junior World Champion Parham Maghoodloo also joined the leading pack after inflicting Stefan Kuipers' third straight loss. Lucas van Foreest (Jorden's younger brother) defeated Evgeny Bareev, making it a great day for the youngsters in the Challengers event. 

Maghsoodloo has not drawn a single game so far | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 3 - Challengers

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
TBPerf.
1
GM

1
GM
2687
½

2
GM
2643
½

3
GM
2500
1

Ø 2610
2/3
2584
2.0
3
2.00
2735
2
GM
GM
2699


2
GM
2615
½

3
GM
2477
½

Ø 2590
2/3
2699
2.0
3
1.50
2715
3
GM

1
GM
2615
½

2
WGM
2472
½

3
GM
2650
1

Ø 2579
2/3
2502
2.0
3
1.50
2704
4
GM
GM
2604


2
GM
2650
½

3
GM
2687
½

Ø 2603
2/3
2604
2.0
3
1.00
2728
5
GM
GM
2643

1
IM
2470
1

2
GM
2584
½


Ø 2531
2/3
2643
2.0
3
0.50
2656
6
GM

1
GM
2699
0

2
GM
2477
1

3
IM
2470
1

Ø 2549
2/3
2679
2.0
3
0.00
2674
7
GM
GM
2687

1
GM
2584
½


3
GM
2604
½

Ø 2576
1.5/3
2687
1.5
3
1.00
2576
8
GM
GM
2615

1
GM
2502
½

2
GM
2699
½

3
WGM
2472
½

Ø 2558
1.5/3
2615
1.5
3
1.00
2558
9
GM
GM
2650


Ø 2548
1.5/3
2650
1.5
3
0.50
2548
10
GM
GM
2500

1
GM
2477
½

2
IM
2470
1

3
GM
2584
0

Ø 2510
1.5/3
2500
1.5
3
0.00
2510
11
GM

1
GM
2650
0

2
GM
2687
½

3
GM
2643
½

Ø 2660
1/3
2539
1.0
3
1.00
2535
12
GM
GM
2477

1
GM
2500
½


3
GM
2699
½

Ø 2626
1/3
2477
1.0
3
1.00
2501
13
WGM

1
GM
2604
0

2
GM
2502
½

3
GM
2615
½

Ø 2574
1/3
2472
1.0
3
1.00
2449
14
IM
IM
2470

1
GM
2643
0

2
GM
2500
0


Ø 2607
0/3
2470
0.0
3
0.00
1807
TBs: Koya, Wins, Direct encounter

All games - Challengers 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.