Initiating fission

by Jonathan Speelman
8/15/2021 – In this week’s column, Jon Speelman looks at the dichotomy between energy and matter in chess. While some players choose material, others go for dynamism. To illustrate his points, Speelman analyses two recent wins by Magnus Carlsen and an early game by Mikhail Tal, in which he was able to recover and win from a material disadvantage “of a mere two knights”! | Pictured: Tal at the 1964 Amsterdam Interzonal | Photo: Harry Pot / Anefo

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Energy and matter

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

Robert HubnerWhen I was one of Nigel Short’s seconds at his world championship match against Garry Kasparov in London 1993, my main sparring partner was Robert Hubner [pictured / photo by Rob Bogaerts]. Nigel had bravely decided to take Garry on in one of the sharpest responses to the Najdorf — 6.Bc4. And in those far off days, when chess computers were still in their infancy, my job was to attempt to batter the Najdorf with vast injections of energy while Robert upheld the power of matter to resist.

Sadly, I have no memory of the specifics, but he’s a superb defender, and I was often surprised and awed as my efforts foundered and I was unable to initiate fission. I remain though in my own games very much in the camp of energy rather than matter. For instance, I would normally much rather have an intact position with no material advantage but some positional plus than an extra piece in a position which “should” be defensible if not winning but gives excellent scope for the defender to go astray (though of course if the attack is ridiculous then you do have to take the piece and suffer mildly for a short while).

The value of chess pieces of course varies wildly according to position, and in the days of Alpha Zero, energy is very much in fashion (even if Stockfish beat LCZero decisively by 56-44 in their latest 100-game match).

After he loses a match, the present world champion often dissipates the negative energy with a ferocious series of blitz or bullet. After losing to Jan-Krzysztof Duda in the semi-final of the recent World Cup, however, Magnus Carlsen still had another opponent to face in the 3rd/4th play-off — Vladimir Fedoseev. And Carlsen pumped his ire into two superb games in which he showed the destruction that exchange sacrifices can sometimes generate, with total  domination in both cases. The games have appeared here and elsewhere, but I’m quickly reprising them anyway.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.h4 As anti-Grunfeld idea. Of course, if d5 now there is no knight to exchange on c3 while after Bg7 Nc3 White is ready to meet d5 with h5. Bg7 3...d5 4.cxd5 c6!? is suggested by engines. 5.h5!? 4.Nc3 d6 4...d5 5.h5 5.e4 Nc6 A nice move trying to prove that h4 was mistaken, since it can't now control g4 from h3. 6.d5 6.Nge2 0-0 7.f3 e5 8.d5 Nd4 was played earlier in the World Cup: 9.Be3 c5 10.dxc6 bxc6 11.Nxd4 exd4 12.Bxd4 Rb8 13.Qc2 c5 14.Bf2 Be6 15.0-0-0 Nd7 16.Rxd6 Qa5 17.Be1 Ne5 18.f4 Nxc4 19.Bxc4 Bxc4 20.e5 Rfd8 21.Rxd8+ Rxd8 22.h5 Bxa2 23.hxg6 hxg6 24.Ne4
24...Qb6? 24...Qb5 is apparently okay for Black 25.Bh4 Rd4 26.Nf6+ Kf8 27.Bf2 Bxf6 28.exf6 Qxf6 29.Qxc5+ Rd6 30.Qc8+ 1-0 (30) Shankland,S (2709)-Svidler,P (2714) Krasnaya Polyana RUS 2021
6...Ne5 7.Be2 h5 8.Bf4 0-0 9.Nf3 Nxf3+ 10.gxf3!? Very natural, but later he surely regretted it. c6 11.Qd2 cxd5 12.cxd5 Kh7 to prevent the exchange of bishops 13.a4 Nd7 14.a5
14...f5 Shorn of the need to battle to win the tournament, Carlsen played tremendously fluently in this and the next game, allowing his "hand" to do its work. He now gets serious counterplay. 15.Ra3 15.Be3 15...Ne5 16.Be3 f4! A lovely move, sacrificing the pawn to preare an exchange sacrifice. 17.Bxf4 Bd7! This classy move gets a step closer to completing development while holding fire for the moment. 17...Rxf4 18.Qxf4 Bh6 19.Qg3 Qf8 might have been hasty. My engine now likes 20.Kd1 18.Nd1 Both blocking the king's escape to the queenside and taking the knigt a very long way from contesting f4. Rxf4! 19.Qxf4 Bh6 20.Qg3 Qf8
Whatever engines may say about this position, in practice it's utterly vile for White, who has no chance of becoming active in the foreseeable future. 21.Ne3 21.Rc3 b5 22.Kf1 22.b4 Bf4 23.Qg2 Rc8 22...b4 23.Rc2 Bf4 24.Qg1 Rc8 25.Rxc8 Qxc8 26.Kg2 Here White has consolidated to some extent, though Blck still has plenty for the exchange and pawn. 21.0-0 Bf4 22.Qg2 Qf6 23.Qh1 g5 splat! 21...Bf4 22.Qg2 Rc8 23.Rc3 Rxc3 24.bxc3 Qc8 25.c4 b5! 26.axb6 axb6
27.Qg1? Too slow. Strangely Houdini claims that 27.Kf1 b5 28.Kg1 bxc4 29.Qf1 c3 is okay for White, continuing 30.Kg2 c2 31.Qc1 Ba4 32.Qa3 Bd7 33.Qc1 Ba4= 27...Qa8 28.Kf1 Qa2 29.Ng2 Qa1+ 30.Ne1 Qb2
31.Ng2 31.Nd3 would at least eliminate Black's massive steed though Nxd3 32.Bxd3 Qc3 33.Be2 Qc2 looks nasty. I now wanted to advance the king via e5 but the engine laughs uproariously as it notes that as the king passes through e65 there is a snap mate... 34.Rh2 Kg7 35.Qh1 Kf6 36.Qg1 Be8 37.Rh3 Ke5? 38.Kg2! Qxe2 39.Qa1+ 31...Qc1+ 32.Ne1 Qd2 Black is now tied hand and foot. 33.Qg2 Kg7 34.Rg1 Kf8 35.Qh1 e6 36.Rg3 exd5 37.exd5 Bf5 38.Rg1 Kf7 39.Rg3
39...Nd7 en route to c5-b3-d4. Fedoseev tried returning the exchange, but it didn't help. 40.Rg5 40.Rg1 Nc5 41.Rg3 Nb3 40...Bxg5 41.hxg5 Ne5 41...Ne5 Here he resigned since Qc1 is coming, after which the threat of Nd3 (or indeed Nxc4) will win the house: 42.Qh2 42.Qh4 Qc1 43.Qh1 Nd3 42...Qc1 43.f4 Nd3 43...Nxc4 44.Bxd3 Bxd3+ 45.Kg2 Qxe1
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Fedoseev,V2696Carlsen,M28470–12021E60FIDE World Cup 20218.1
Carlsen,M2847Fedoseev,V26961–02021B12FIDE World Cup 20218.2

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Tal’s queen

Although the queen is the most powerful piece on the chessboard, she too varies greatly in her effectiveness depending on what targets are available. Her forte (apart from enthusiastically marshalling mating attacks) is in forking loose pieces, and if they are available then she can be utterly deadly. But if all the enemy forces are battened down then she can be fairly useless. Take a black bishop on c6 say. By itself this is a potential tasty morsel for a marauding queen, but if you add a black pawn on b7 then they protect each other perfectly and the prelate is off the menu.

Like all great attacking players, Misha Tal loved to use his queen. I whinged here a while ago about not being able to find the book I had on him when I was a kid, which is by Peter Clarke. Happily, while looking for something entirely different, I found it on my shelves. Of course, the analysis is often wrong when checked by modern-day software, but the spirit of Tal’s play shines through. I began putting the games in a database, though I’ve only thus far done a few. In an early game, he was able to recover and win from a material disadvantage of a mere two knights.   

To finish, I’ve got a very recent game from the Smyslov Memorial in Moscow. When I first saw it online, the position looked almost like a construction task. Later, Black's queen went on the rampage.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 I found this in Megabase with some variations and a few odd notes in French, which I've translated. I've added to this too. c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4 e5 7.Nf3 Nbd7 8.Bd3 8.a4 JS is much more common Be7 9.Bd3 0-0 10.0-0 exf4 11.Bxf4 Qb6+ 12.Kh1 Qxb2 13.Qe1 Qb6 14.Bg5 Nc5 15.Qh4 Nxd3 16.cxd3 Qd8!? Rizzitano 8...Be7 8...b5 9.0-0 0-0 10.Kh1 b5 11.a3 Qc7 12.fxe5 dxe5 13.Nh4 Nc5 14.Bg5
14...Qd8N RR 14...h6 15.Bc1 Be6 16.Nf5 Rfd8 17.Nxe7+ Qxe7 18.Qf3 Ncd7 19.Bd2 Re8 20.h3 Kh7 21.Ne2 Qd6 22.Ng3 g6 23.Rf2 Kg7 24.Raf1 Rac8 25.Qe3 Rh8 26.Ne2 h5 27.Bc3 Bc4 28.Bxc4 Rxc4 29.Qg5 Szymanski, A-Gadalinski,J/Krakow 1953/EXT 2002/1-0 (56) 15.Nf5 Bxf5 16.Rxf5 Nfd7 16...g6 17.Rf1 Nxd3 17.Bxe7 Qxe7 18.Nd5 Qd6 19.Qg4! g6 20.Raf1 20.Raf1 Rac8 21.h4 Qe6 22.h5 Kh8 23.hxg6 fxg6 24.Rxf8+ Rxf8 25.Qxe6 Rxf1+ 26.Bxf1 Nxe6 27.b4 is given in the notes I inherited, when the endgame is better for White. 20...f6 21.h4 21.R1f3!? Kh8 22.Rh3! Rg8 23.Qh4 Rg7 24.Nxf6! Nxf6 24...Qe7! is better JS 25.Rf2 Nxf6 26.Qxf6 Qxf6 27.Rxf6 Rc7 due to the strong knight Black should be okay. 25.Rxf6 Qe7 26.Qf2 21...Kh8 22.R5f3
22...f5 Bravely offering Tal a chance to sacrifice. It's a good decision, but whether his opponent would have had to bottle to play it once he was established is another matter. 23.exf5! Qxd5 24.fxg6 Rxf3 25.g7+ 25.Rxf3 e4 26.Rf5 Qe6 27.g7+ Kg8 28.Be2∞ Unclear is optimistic for White "in theory", but maybe not in practice. 25...Kg8 26.Bxh7+!? As the French notes said, Tal never missed a chance to muddy the waters, and at the board this usually worked. Kxh7 27.Rxf3 Ne4 27...Qe6 28.Qh5+ Qh6 29.Qf7 Qxg7-+ 28.h5 28.g8Q+ Rxg8 29.Qh5+ Kg7 30.Qg4+ Kh6! 28...Ndf6 29.Qg6+ Kg8 30.h6 Ra7 30...Rd8 31.Kh2 Qd7 "should" be winning for Black. 31.Kh2!
A great move to throw at your opponent. Realisng that nothing works directly, Tal got his king off the back rank giving Black a chance to move... and blunder. 31...Re7? And, of course, it worked. 31...Qd2 32.h7+ Nxh7 33.Qxe4 Qh6+ 33...Ng5 34.Rf8+ Kxg7 35.Qxe5+ Kxf8 36.Qb8+ Kg7 37.Qxa7+ Nf7 38.Qxa6 34.Rh3 Nf6! 35.Rxh6 35.Qxe5 Ng4+ 35...Nxe4 would have been a dififcult path to what should be a pretty clear win, though Black can still hope to fight. 32.Rh3! Nh7 33.Rd3 Qa8
33...Qxd3 34.cxd3 Nef6 34...Neg5 35.Qc6! 35.g4 34.Qxe4! And it all falls apart for Black. Qxe4 35.Rd8+ Kf7 36.g8Q+ Kf6 37.Rd6+ Kf5 38.Qg6+ Kf4 39.g3+ Ke3 40.Rd3+ Qxd3 41.Qxd3+ Kf2 Tal was lucky - but he normally was.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tal,M-Pasman,M-1–01953B93LAT-ch 10th
Sarana,A2643Paravyan,D26310–12021D37Smyslov Memorial 20213.3

Select an entry from the list to switch between games



On this DVD Dorian Rogozenco, Mihail Marin, Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller present the 8. World Chess Champion in video lessons: his openings, his understanding of chess strategy, his artful endgame play, and finally his immortal combinations.


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.