Speelman on Tal: “His feeling for the initiative has never been bettered”

by Jonathan Speelman
9/6/2020 – Star columnist Jon Speelman was asked to write about Mikhail Tal, and he happily obliged. Speelman points out that, had Misha Tal been alive today, he would certainly be playing blitz and bullet online, and adds, “He was able to play extremely strongly, even in a state in which the rest of us would have struggled to remain upright”. | Pictured: Tal analysing with Dutch IM Coen Zuidema in Wijk aan Zee 1973 | Photo: Dutch National Archive

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

The people’s champion

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

When I stream at twitch.tv/jonspeelman — at the moment rather sporadically —  I sometimes ask for ideas for this column. An Indian guy suggested that I do one on Mikhail Tal, and while we have seen some Tal games recently (notably when he splatted me at the Subotica Interzonal in 1987) I’m very happy to oblige.

Mikhail TalIn order to become a grandmaster you have at some stage to be obsessed by chess to the point of being in love with the game. It doesn’t have to persist, and while I myself still very much enjoy both playing and watching chess, my relationship with the game has matured to something more akin to a long term marriage than the passion of youth.  

Even the world's very best players don’t necessarily have to be crazy about the game — though they presumably very much like winning. And we are very lucky at the moment to have a world champion in Magnus Carlsen who not only obviously really likes playing but is also at times able to take himself sufficiently unseriously to play extended bullet sessions in which he’s bound to lose a serious number of games.

This is something which you couldn’t possibly imagine the Patriarch Mikhail Botvinnk doing (had the technology been available when he reigned supreme): and indeed Botvinnik reportedly disapproved of blitz chess. But you could certainly see Misha Tal playing blitz and bullet on the internet — he was able to play extremely strongly, even in a state in which the rest of us would have struggled to remain upright.

[Photo: Ron Kroon / Anefo]

I discovered this at the end of the Montetaxco Interzonal in Mexico 1985 — in the cycle which preceded the one in which I qualified to the Candidates via Subotica. I had a reasonable tournament but was never in the mix to qualify, while Tal qualified coming third behind Jan Timman and Jesus Nogueiras.

During and after the tournament there were a couple of times when Tal showed just how much he loved chess and how unflappable he was.

 
Tal vs. Saeed, 1985
Position after 41...Rf6

In round 3, Tal adjourned against Ahmed Saeed Saeed from the UAE about here. After a couple of hours’ play Tal won, but in the post-mortem after he’d already shown his opponent how to defend, they realized that Black's queenside pawns had been placed wrongly on the board — presumably on a6 and b7. After some sort of appeal by Saeed, it was agreed that they should play again, and Tal calmly accepted this and beat Saeed a different way!

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.d4 d5 4.Bg5 Nbd7 5.e3 c6 6.cxd5 exd5 7.Bd3 Be7 8.Qc2 0-0 8...Nh5 9.Bxe7 Qxe7 10.Nge2 g6 is the main line nowadays. Black waits for White to castle and then follows him with his king to the same side of the board. 9.Nf3 Re8 10.0-0 Nf8 11.a3 Unusual and surely designed to confuse his opponent. Instead 11.Rae1 Ne4 12.Bxe7 Qxe7 13.Bxe4 dxe4 14.Nd2 f5 15.f3 exf3 16.Nxf3 Be6 17.e4 fxe4 18.Rxe4 is one critical line which is supposed to be fine for Black if he knows what he's doing. Rad8 19.Rfe1 Qf6 20.Re5 Ng6 21.Ne4 Qf8 22.Neg5 Bf7 23.Nxf7 Qxf7 24.Ng5 Rxe5 25.Nxf7 Rxe1+ 26.Kf2 Rde8 27.Ne5 Nxe5 28.Kxe1 Nf3+ 29.Kf2 Nxd4 30.Qa4 Rf8+ 31.Ke3 Nf5+ 32.Ke4 a6 33.Ke5 Ne3 34.Kd6 Nd5 35.Qe4 g6 36.g4 g5 37.Qe6+ Kg7 38.Kc5 h6 39.a3 Rf7 40.b4 Re7 41.Qc8 Rc7 42.Qd8 Rf7 43.Qd6 Re7 44.a4 Rf7 45.Qe5+ Kh7 46.h4 gxh4 47.Qh5 Kg7 48.g5 hxg5 49.Qxg5+ Kf8 50.Qxh4 Ke8 51.Qh8+ Kd7 52.a5 Ke6 53.Qe8+ Re7 54.Qg6+ Nf6 55.Kb6 Rd7 56.Ka7 Re7 57.Kb8 Rd7 58.Kc8 Re7 59.Qh6 Kf7 60.Qf4 Ke6 61.Qe3+ Kf7 62.Qh6 Ke6 63.Qg6 Rf7 64.Qd3 Re7 65.Qh3+ Kf7 66.Kd8 Re8+ 67.Kc7 Re7+ 68.Kd6 Ne4# 0-1 (68) Bu Xiangzhi (2691)-Nakamura,H (2670) Gibraltar ENG 2008 11.Bxf6 Bxf6 12.b4 starts the classic minority attack. and 11.h3 which was first popularised by Anatoly Karpov is probably the main line nowadays; one point being that if Ne4 12.Bf4 11...Ng6 11...Ne4 Relevant: 11...Ne4 12.Bf4 Ng5 13.Nxg5 Bxg5 14.Bxg5 Qxg5 15.Rae1 Bd7 16.f4 Qh6 17.Qf2 Re7 18.f5 g6 19.e4 dxe4 20.Nxe4 gxf5 21.Qg3+ Kh8 22.Nd6 f4 23.Rxe7 Qxd6 24.Rxd7 Qxd7 25.Qxf4 Rd8 26.Qf6+ Kg8 27.Kh1 Qxd4 28.Qxf7+ Kh8 29.Qe7 Ng6 30.Bxg6 hxg6 31.h3 b5 32.Rf6 Rg8 33.Rxc6 Rg7 34.Qg5 Kh7 35.Kh2 b4 36.Rf6 bxa3 37.bxa3 Qc4 38.Rf4 Qc7 39.Qh4+ Kg8 40.Qg3 a5 41.a4 Petrosian,T (2605) -Beliavsky,A (2570) Moscow 1983 1-0 12.Ne5 Ng4 12...Nxe5 13.dxe5 Ng4 14.Bxh7+ Kh8 15.Bf4 may well be fine for Black, but you'd need a lot of courage to play this against Tal. 13.Bxe7 Qxe7 14.Nxg4 Bxg4 15.Rae1
15...Bd7N Predecessor: 15...Qh4 16.f3 Bd7 17.Qf2 Qxf2+ 18.Kxf2 Ne7 19.g4 h6 20.h3 b6 21.f4 c5 22.f5 c4 23.Bc2 b5 24.Kg3 a5 25.f6 b4 26.fxe7 bxc3 27.bxc3 Rxe7 28.e4 Rae8 29.e5 Rb8 30.Rb1 Ree8 31.h4 Red8 32.h5 Be6 33.Ba4 Kf8 34.Kf4 Ke7 35.g5 hxg5+ 36.Kxg5 Rh8 37.Bc2 Bd7 38.Rxb8 Rxb8 39.Rb1 Rxb1 40.Bxb1 Bc8 41.Bc2 Bd7 42.Bd1 Bb5 43.Bg4 Bc6 44.e6 Be8 45.exf7 Georgiev,K (2430)-Inkiov,V (2490) Plovdiv 1984 1/2-1/2 16.f4 Nf8 17.f5 Qd6 18.Qf2
18...c5?! In pricniple Black would like to get some activity in the centre, but this encourages f6 which can now not be met by Qxf6. 19.f6 g6 20.Qh4 cxd4 21.Qh6 Ne6 22.exd4 Qf8 23.Qh4 Nc7 24.Qg3 Rac8 25.Rxe8 Qxe8 26.Re1 Be6 27.h4 Qf8 28.Qf4 h6 29.Bb1 Kh8 30.Re3 b6 31.Bd3 Kg8 32.Ne2 Kh8
33.Qe5?! Up to here, Tal has been outplaying his opponent so easily that he must have got complacent. 33.Rg3 Ne8 34.Qe5 Nd6 35.Bxg6 is crushing. 33...Bg4 34.Nf4? 34.Qf4 Bxe2 35.Rxe2 Ne6 36.Rxe6 fxe6 37.Bxg6 keeps control. 34...Re8 35.Qxc7 Rxe3 36.Nxg6+ fxg6 37.Bxg6 Qg8 38.Qf4? 38.f7 Qf8 39.Qf4 Re1+ 40.Kh2 Re6 41.Qxg4 reaches the game while avoiding a trick that draws. 38...Re1+ 38...Qxg6 39.f7 Qb1+ 40.Kh2 Rh3+! 41.gxh3 Qxb2+ 42.Kg3 Qxa3+ 43.Kxg4 Kg7 should be a draw. 39.Kh2 Qf8 40.f7 Re6 41.Qxg4
41...Rf6 And around here they resumed, initially with the pawns on a6 and b7!. I don't know how Tal won the first time, but this is the score which was recorded in the tournament book later: 42.Qg3 Re6 43.h5 Re7 44.Qg4 Qd8 45.Kg1 Qf8 46.Kf2 Qd8 47.g3 Qf8 48.Kg2 Qd8 49.Qf5 Kg7 50.Bh7 Rxf7 51.Qg6+ Kf8 52.Qxh6+ Rg7 53.Bf5 Qe7 54.Kh3 Qg5 55.Qxg5 Rxg5 56.Bg6!
This very pretty move traps the rook. Of course it wouldn't matter if the pawns were on a6 and b7 since White could sitll easily force zugzwang. 56...Kg7 57.Kh4 Kh6 58.a4
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tal,M2565Saeed,S24001–01985D36Taxco Interzonal3

My second at Montetaxco was Will Watson, the magnificent attacking player who — I think it was Boris Spassky — was described as a “drunken machine gunner”, who later became a very successful lawyer.

At dinner one day during the tournament, one of the other player’s seconds decided to have dinner with us rather than with his principal and his wife. Afterwards one of the iconic conversations in chess history took place, and it went something like:

Principal: “Are you happy?”
Second:  “Are you bothering me?”
Principal: “Are you happy?”
Second:  “Are you bothering me?”

After which the second was sacked! He definitely lasted longer than I did when I was Victor Korchnoi’s second at the Montpellier Candidates later that year.

After the tournament finished, Will asked Tal if he could play some blitz. Tal was drinking and said that they could do it later, and at some time in the wee hours with Tal fairly stocious Will played him and, not wanting to take advantage of his hero, had a very polite series of games.

When Will had finished, Guillermo Garcia, the Cuban who won one of the big US Opens at one stage (perhaps the World Open?) and very sadly died in a car crash in 1990, sat down opposite the very drunk Tal and set about killing him, drunk or not. On the contrary, Tal slaughtered him!

Tal’s feeling for the initiative and sacrifice has never been bettered.

I could have chosen any of dozens of his games and have gone for this one from the 1960 World Championship match, which I’ve re-annotated taking some notice of the prognostications of our silicon lords and masters, but not too much.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 Nf6 2.Nf3 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 0-0 5.d4 d6 6.Nc3 Nbd7 7.0-0 e5 8.e4 c6 9.h3 Qb6 10.d5 10.Re1 is most common when Black ususally surrendes the centre immediately with exd4, since if Re8 d5 White can reasonably claim that Re1 is more useful than Re8. exd4 10...Re8 11.d5 11.Nxd4 Re8 10.c5 dxc5 11.dxe5 Ne8 12.e6 fxe6 is critical and was played wth success by Anatoly Karpov several times in the 1990s with wins against John Nunn twice and Judit Polgar. 10...cxd5 11.cxd5 Nc5 12.Ne1 Bd7 13.Nd3 Nxd3 14.Qxd3 Rfc8 If 14...Nh5 15.Be3 Qd8 Tal disliked 16.Qe2 to prevent f5 for the monment, though in fact 16.Nb5! Bxb5 17.Qxb5 looks better, when if f5 18.exf5 gxf5 19.Bf3 Nf6 20.Rac1 Black of course has practical play but it's a bit dubious. 16...Qe8 preparing f5 (when Black could recapture with the g-pawn since the queen would then defend h5) is perfectly decent. 15.Rb1 Nh5 This is definitely what Black wants to play and surely the right thing to do against Botvinnik, who above all craved control of the poition. But given that the tactics shouldn't quite work for Black after Nh5, then simply 15...Qd8 was perhaps better "theoretically speaking". 16.Be3 Qb4 17.Qe2 Rc4 18.Rfc1 Rac8 19.Kh2 Black's build up on the queenside looks impressive but his a-pawn is hanging and after 19.a3 Qb3 19...Qa5 20.Bf1 Qd8 21.Qe1 and Black will have to sacrifice the exchange somehow, probably with Rd4 20.Bxa7 b6 21.Bf1 19...f5 20.exf5 Bxf5 21.Ra1
Certainly not 21.Ne4?? Rxe4! 22.Rxc8+ Bxc8 and wins. 21...Nf4!? This caused a sensation at the time, and apparently the players had to be moved away form the main hall due to the hubbub. It's not a move you'd consider for long against a modern chess computer, but they wouldn't be invented for another thirty plus years, and rather than retreat and allow his opponent to start grinding it made every sense to gamble. 22.gxf4 exf4 23.Bd2 23.a3! Qb3 24.Bxa7! was more or less a refutation. Ra8 24...b6 25.a4 25.Nb5! 25.f3 Rxa7 26.Nb5 Rxc1 27.Qe8+ Bf8 28.Rxc1 Ra6 doesn't work for White. 25...Rxc1 26.Rxc1 Be5 27.Nd4! 27.Bf3 Bd3 27...Qa4 28.Nf3! Rxa7 29.Nxe5 Qe8 30.Rc7 and Black ends up in deep trouble after eg: Ra8 31.Rxb7 Qxe5 31...Rc8 32.a4 32.Qxe5 dxe5 33.Re7 23...Qxb2?! 23...Be5! was Tal's inital intention but he became concerned by 24.f3 24.Kg1 Qxb2 25.Rcb1 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 24...Qxb2 25.Nd1 Qd4 25...Qxa1 26.Rxa1 Bxa1 is possibly better. 26.Rxc4 Rxc4 27.Rc1 Rxc1 28.Bxc1 Qxd5 when he didn't feel that he had quite enough 29.Bf1 29.Nf2 24.Rab1 f3
The point, but it doesn't quite work. 25.Rxb2? Cracking under the immense pressure which he has been put under. Later it was discovered that 25.Bxf3 Bxb1 26.Rxb1 Qc2 27.Be4 Rxe4 28.Nxe4! 28.Qxe4 Be5+ 28...Be5+ 29.Kg2 Qxb1 30.Nxd6! gives the advantage, and in fact after Bxd6 31.Qe6+ Kg7 32.Qd7+ Kg8 33.Qxc8+ Bf8 34.Qe6+ Kg7 35.Bc3+ Kh6 36.Qf6 36.d6 36.Qg4 Qf5 37.Qh4+ Qh5 38.Qxh5+ Kxh5 38...gxh5 39.Be5 Bg7 40.Bxg7+ Kxg7 41.f4 b5 42.Kf3 a5 39.Be5 Be7 39...Bc5 40.Bc7 Bd4 41.d6 Be5 42.Bb8 Bf6 43.f4 g5 44.Kf3 40.Bc7 36...Qf5 37.Qh4+ Qh5 38.Qxh5+ Kxh5 38...gxh5 39.Be5 Kg6 40.d6 Kf7 41.d7 Ke7 42.Bd6+ 39.Be5 Kg5 39...Be7 40.Bc7 Bg5 41.f4 Bh6 42.Kg3 g5 43.f5 Bg7 44.d6 Be5+ 45.Kf3 Kh6 46.Bb8 Bf6 47.d7 Bd8 48.Be5 40.d6 White is simply winning. 25...fxe2 26.Rb3 Rd4! 27.Be1 Be5+ 28.Kg1 Bf4! not 28...Rd1 29.Rxd1 exd1Q 30.Nxd1 Rc1 31.Bf3 Bc2 32.Bd2 Ra1 33.Rxb7 Bxd1 34.Kg2 29.Nxe2 If 29.Ra1 Rxc3 30.Rxc3 Rd1 31.f3 Bd2 29...Rxc1 30.Nxd4 Rxe1+ 31.Bf1 Be4 32.Ne2 Be5 33.f4 Bf6 34.Rxb7 Bxd5 35.Rc7 Bxa2 With an immense effort, Botvinnik has avoided immedaite defeat but the ending is hopeless anyway. 36.Rxa7 Bc4 37.Ra8+ Kf7 38.Ra7+ Ke6 39.Ra3 d5 40.Kf2 Bh4+ 41.Kg2 Kd6 42.Ng3 Bxg3 43.Bxc4 dxc4 44.Kxg3 Kd5 45.Ra7 c3 46.Rc7 Kd4
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Botvinnik,M-Tal,M-0–11960E69World Championship 23th6

To finish off a very nice if quite slight victory form a few years earlier.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 e6 4.Nc3 exd5 5.cxd5 d6 6.Nf3 g6 7.e4 Bg7 8.Be2 0-0 9.0-0 Re8 10.Nd2 Na6 11.Re1 Nc7 12.a4 b6 13.Qc2
13...Ng4?! Setting a nice trap, but 13...Rb8 14.Nc4 Ba6 is better, to challenge the knight before it gets settled. 14.h3? You have to wonder what planet Gurgenidze was living on. Here he is inviting the most dangerous attacking player in the world to make a sacrifice. which cursory examination reveals to be at the very least extremely dangerous. 14.Bxg4! Bxg4 15.Nc4 Qf6 16.Be3 With a beautiful knight on c4 White has a very pleasant advantage. 14...Nxf2! 15.Kxf2 Qh4+ 16.Kf1 16.Kg1 simply drops the rook while if 16.g3 Bd4+ and mate soon follows. 16...Bd4 17.Nd1
17...Qxh3! Very pretty - and murderous to boot. Even if you didn't see Qxh3, then Bxh3 should have been enough to deter White from risking 14.h3: 17...Bxh3 18.Ra3 Bf5 18...Bxg2+? 19.Kxg2 Qxe1 20.Nf3 Qb4 21.Bd2 19.Ne3 Bxe4 20.Nxe4 Rxe4 21.Bf3 Re5 22.Qf2 and it's still pretty dangerous - though engines give several paths to equality. 18.Bf3 Qh2 19.Ne3 f5! Opening up more lines 20.Ndc4 fxe4 21.Bxe4 Ba6
Even without any analysis it's obvious that with no good home for his king and pinned to the eyeballs White is going to be slaughtered. 22.Bf3 The least bad option. If 22.Ke2 Qh4 23.Bf3 23.Bd3 Nxd5 23...Bxe3 24.Bxe3 Rxe3+! even stronger than Bxc4+ 25.Kxe3 Qd4+ 26.Ke2 Bxc4+ etc 22...Re5 23.Ra3 Rae8 24.Bd2 Nxd5! 25.Bxd5+ Rxd5 26.Ke2 Bxe3 27.Rxe3 Bxc4+ 27...Bxc4+ 28.Kd1 Rxe3 29.Rxe3 29.Qxc4 Rxe1+ 30.Kxe1 Qe5+ 29...Qg1+ 30.Re1 Qf2 31.Kc1 Bb3 32.Qc3 Qxe1+! 33.Bxe1 Rd1# is one nice possible finish.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Gurgenidze,B-Tal,M-0–11957A78URS-ch2418


Master Class Vol.2: Mihail Tal

On this DVD Dorian Rogozenco, Mihail Marin, Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller present the 8. World Chess Champion in video lessons: his openings, his understanding of chess strategy, his artful endgame play, and finally his immortal combinations.


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.