Speelman on Tal: “His feeling for the initiative has never been bettered”

by Jonathan Speelman
9/6/2020 – Star columnist Jon Speelman was asked to write about Mikhail Tal, and he happily obliged. Speelman points out that, had Misha Tal been alive today, he would certainly be playing blitz and bullet online, and adds, “He was able to play extremely strongly, even in a state in which the rest of us would have struggled to remain upright”. | Pictured: Tal analysing with Dutch IM Coen Zuidema in Wijk aan Zee 1973 | Photo: Dutch National Archive

ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

The people’s champion

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

When I stream at twitch.tv/jonspeelman — at the moment rather sporadically —  I sometimes ask for ideas for this column. An Indian guy suggested that I do one on Mikhail Tal, and while we have seen some Tal games recently (notably when he splatted me at the Subotica Interzonal in 1987) I’m very happy to oblige.

Mikhail TalIn order to become a grandmaster you have at some stage to be obsessed by chess to the point of being in love with the game. It doesn’t have to persist, and while I myself still very much enjoy both playing and watching chess, my relationship with the game has matured to something more akin to a long term marriage than the passion of youth.  

Even the world's very best players don’t necessarily have to be crazy about the game — though they presumably very much like winning. And we are very lucky at the moment to have a world champion in Magnus Carlsen who not only obviously really likes playing but is also at times able to take himself sufficiently unseriously to play extended bullet sessions in which he’s bound to lose a serious number of games.

This is something which you couldn’t possibly imagine the Patriarch Mikhail Botvinnk doing (had the technology been available when he reigned supreme): and indeed Botvinnik reportedly disapproved of blitz chess. But you could certainly see Misha Tal playing blitz and bullet on the internet — he was able to play extremely strongly, even in a state in which the rest of us would have struggled to remain upright.

[Photo: Ron Kroon / Anefo]

I discovered this at the end of the Montetaxco Interzonal in Mexico 1985 — in the cycle which preceded the one in which I qualified to the Candidates via Subotica. I had a reasonable tournament but was never in the mix to qualify, while Tal qualified coming third behind Jan Timman and Jesus Nogueiras.

During and after the tournament there were a couple of times when Tal showed just how much he loved chess and how unflappable he was.

 

In round 3, Tal adjourned against Ahmed Saeed Saeed from the UAE about here. After a couple of hours’ play Tal won, but in the post-mortem after he’d already shown his opponent how to defend, they realized that Black's queenside pawns had been placed wrongly on the board — presumably on a6 and b7. After some sort of appeal by Saeed, it was agreed that they should play again, and Tal calmly accepted this and beat Saeed a different way!

 

My second at Montetaxco was Will Watson, the magnificent attacking player who — I think it was Boris Spassky — was described as a “drunken machine gunner”, who later became a very successful lawyer.

At dinner one day during the tournament, one of the other player’s seconds decided to have dinner with us rather than with his principal and his wife. Afterwards one of the iconic conversations in chess history took place, and it went something like:

Principal: “Are you happy?”
Second:  “Are you bothering me?”
Principal: “Are you happy?”
Second:  “Are you bothering me?”

After which the second was sacked! He definitely lasted longer than I did when I was Victor Korchnoi’s second at the Montpellier Candidates later that year.

After the tournament finished, Will asked Tal if he could play some blitz. Tal was drinking and said that they could do it later, and at some time in the wee hours with Tal fairly stocious Will played him and, not wanting to take advantage of his hero, had a very polite series of games.

When Will had finished, Guillermo Garcia, the Cuban who won one of the big US Opens at one stage (perhaps the World Open?) and very sadly died in a car crash in 1990, sat down opposite the very drunk Tal and set about killing him, drunk or not. On the contrary, Tal slaughtered him!

Tal’s feeling for the initiative and sacrifice has never been bettered.

I could have chosen any of dozens of his games and have gone for this one from the 1960 World Championship match, which I’ve re-annotated taking some notice of the prognostications of our silicon lords and masters, but not too much.

 

To finish off a very nice if quite slight victory form a few years earlier.

 


Master Class Vol.2: Mihail Tal

On this DVD Dorian Rogozenco, Mihail Marin, Oliver Reeh and Karsten Müller present the 8. World Chess Champion in video lessons: his openings, his understanding of chess strategy, his artful endgame play, and finally his immortal combinations.


Links




Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Raymond Labelle Raymond Labelle 9/8/2020 11:55
Ha, I should have checked his birthdate before asking the question - thanks wb!
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 9/8/2020 04:12
Is it Jan Timman?
wb_munchausen wb_munchausen 9/7/2020 01:27
In '73, Short would have been around 8-9 years old, much too young to be the young man in the photo
Raymond Labelle Raymond Labelle 9/7/2020 10:57
Thank you Harry for answering... Short, faithful to himself...
Harry Pillsbury Harry Pillsbury 9/7/2020 05:31
No,that is not Nigel Short. Short wore his hair much....shorter !
tom_70 tom_70 9/6/2020 07:10
I remember Magnus Carlsen being asked a question somewhere about if he played a lot worse after drinking alcohol. He said it didn't really work that way. For him, and I assume other world class talents, they see the board in a certain way, no matter what. They probably lose a few rating points after getting drunk, but it would probably take another world class talent to beat them even then.
Raymond Labelle Raymond Labelle 9/6/2020 06:22
Is it Nigel Short with the glasses about in the middle of the picture? I am not a great physionomist, so I am wondering.
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 9/6/2020 03:48
On White’s move,14.h3 Speelman writes, “You have to wonder what planet Gurgenidze was living on. Here he is inviting the most dangerous attacking player in the world to make a sacrifice.”
Now that observation comes with hindsight. When Tal played the 24th USSR Championship he was recognized as a brilliant talent, but not as “the world’s most dangerous attacking playe”. That reputation was to come later.
In fairness to Gurgenidze, he must have thought he had defended “everything” with 17.Nd1. He merely had to play 18.Nf3 and he could beat back the attack. How was he to anticipate 17…Qxh3!! ?
Speelman is very modest about his defeat in the hands of Tal. Only he had the courage and confidence to provoke Misha the way he did. It was not his day and he was punished.
Otherwise on his day Speelman could be as dangerous as young Misha. It’s a pity that he did not fulfil his potential.
1