“What do I have to do to kill this guy?”
Not only did Magnus Carlsen win an epic match that went down to the wire, but he also did it after having been down on the scoreboard once and again — he bounced back thrice after losing sets 1, 3 and 5, and in the seventh set won on demand after losing the first blitz tiebreaker to take the mini-match to Armageddon. As Yasser Seirawan put it, Hikaru Nakamura must have been wondering, “What do I have to do to kill this guy?”
Carlsen was aware of the fact that having such a long and fighting match go the distance and be decided by a single 5-minute game means a player will end up inevitably heartbroken. The world champion praised his opponent repeatedly during his interview:
In regard to sympathy for my opponent, the format is extremely harsh, such that at the end of the day it doesn’t really matter, there’s a winner and there’s a loser, so it’s extremely harsh on him — he played a great match, he made it extremely difficult for me, so it’s rough obviously.
On this DVD, well-known Indian WGM Tania Sachdev shows you how to evaluate certain positions and then find the right concepts and plans on the basis of her own games.
He had mentioned earlier to Tania Sachdev:
Ultimately, it’s a bit random that everything is decided by one game, but it has to end at some point. I don’t know what to say.
After many of his numerous tournament victories, the world champion has given the public a sense that he had everything under control from start to finish despite the presence of difficulties, while once this matchup came to an end he was markedly tired and could only refer to how tough it had been:
He’s just very, very resilient, that’s what I feel. I just found the whole match very difficult and unpleasant to play. At some point I felt that I was outplaying him, and then he started turning around — I never felt that I had the energy, I never felt that I was cruising. So it was a never-ending struggle.
We got to witness two gladiators facing off in a format in which, despite Nakamura’s marvellous display, the world champion proved to be the strongest player — not for having won the Armageddon decider, but for having consistently performed at the very highest level throughout the last five months, winning four out of the five events of his tour plus the Steinitz Memorial and the Clutch Chess International.
The Norwegian continues to add to his list of triumphs, and we can only wonder whether he is ever going to stop.

Click to enlarge
Carlsen* 3½ : 3½ Nakamura
*Drew with black in Armageddon
Coming from the cleanest set victory of the match, Carlsen kicked off the day with a win. Nakamura, much like the world champion the previous day, sacrificed a knight on g7 to start things off — his attempt at an attack was unsuccessful, however:
Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.
Nakamura vs. Carlsen - Game 1
28.Nxg7 failed to 28...Rxd4 29.Rxd4 Kxg7 30.Qg3+ Kf8 and, although White still tried some tricks against the somewhat exposed king, Black was simply a piece up with two strong passed pawns on the queenside to boot. Carlsen defended against the threats and went on to score a 43-move victory.
Carlsen had the upper hand in game 2 as well, but his edge was too small to be converted into a full point. After the 74-move draw, Nakamura evened the score with the white pieces:
Nakamura vs. Carlsen - Game 3
Black is two pawns up and has a strong passer on the a-file, while White is an exchange up and counts with the ever-present threat of a potential mate on g7. The engines think White is better, but, given the format, accidents could still happen. None of that mattered after Carlsen blundered with 29...Ra8 though — 30.Rxb1 axb1Q 31.Qxe5 wins on the spot.
A well-played draw in game 4 took the set to tiebreaks. The momentum was on Nakamura’s side, who seemed poised to win the epic match after getting ahead on the scoreboard by scoring a full point in the first blitz tiebreaker:
Dutch Grandmaster Roeland Pruijssers and International Master Nico Zwirs created a complete repertoire against the Sicilian that is based on the Open Sicilian and that is easy to learn. They show patterns you should know when playing the Open Sicilian
Nakamura vs. Carlsen - Game 5
Nakamura had outsmarted his opponent out of the opening to gain a pawn on the queenside. The American did not falter in conversion from this position, and only needed a draw with the black pieces to win the final.
In another position with rooks and bishops of opposite colours, it was Carlsen who was in the driver’s seat in the second blitz tiebreaker. Nakamura entered the inferior endgame after missing a chance to create practical problems for his opponent:
Carlsen vs. Nakamura - Game 6
The American grandmaster went for 34...Rdxf3 here, allowing 35.Rb2 Ba4 36.Rxb7 and White soon created a dangerous passed pawn on the queenside. Instead, Black could have played 34...Bd1 in the diagrammed position, when White would have needed to decide between giving up an exchange or defending passively with 35.Rf2. After the text, Carlsen went on to get the needed win to stay in the fight.
By entering the finals as the top seed thanks to his three tournament wins in the previous events of the series, Carlsen gained the right to choose his colour in Armageddon. He had lost after choosing white in set 5, and had a clear plan if the deciding set reached sudden death. He told Tania Sachdev:
It worked out so poorly with white the last time that I thought, if I get to this point, I’m gonna be so tired that it’s better if I can play for a draw. [...] Obviously, I was extremely worried that he would just play very fast and flag me, but that turned out not to be a problem.
A 67-move draw meant Carlsen had won the tournament. Has the world champion any big plans to celebrate such an epic victory? He happily replied:
I’m gonna relax, I’m gonna sleep and I’m gonna just have a big smile on my face!
Replay and check the LiveBook here |
Please, wait...
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.Bxc6 dxc6 6.Nbd2 0-0 7.h3 Nd7 8.Nc4 a5 9.Be3 f6 10.0-0 b5 11.Ncd2 Bxe3 12.fxe3 a4 13.Nh4 c5 14.Nf5 Nb6 15.Qe2 Be6 16.Nf3 Qd7 17.N3h4 Rad8 18.Rfd1 Kh8 19.d4 cxd4 20.exd4 exd4 21.Rxd4 Qc6 22.Rad1 Qc5 23.Qf2 Rxd4 24.Nxd4 Bxa2 25.b3 Rd8 26.Nhf5 axb3 27.cxb3 Bxb3 28.Nxg7 Rxd4 29.Rxd4 Kxg7 30.Qg3+ Kf8 31.Qe3 Nd7 32.Kh1 Ke8 33.Qd2 Be6 34.e5 Qxe5 35.Rh4 Nf8 36.Qb4 Kf7 37.Re4 c5 38.Qb1 Qd5 39.Rf4 b4 40.Qa1 Nd7 41.Qb1 Kg7 42.Qe1 b3 43.Qg3+ Qg5 0–1
- Start an analysis engine:
- Try maximizing the board:
- Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
- Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
- Drag the split bars between window panes.
- Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
- Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
- Create an account to access the games cloud.
Nakamura,H | 2736 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 0–1 | 2020 | C65 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.1 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Nakamura,H | 2736 | ½–½ | 2020 | B31 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.2 |
Nakamura,H | 2736 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 1–0 | 2020 | C65 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.3 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Nakamura,H | 2736 | ½–½ | 2020 | A20 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.4 |
Nakamura,H | 2736 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | 1–0 | 2020 | C65 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.5 |
Carlsen,M | 2863 | Nakamura,H | 2736 | 1–0 | 2020 | A28 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.6 |
Nakamura,H | 2736 | Carlsen,M | 2863 | ½–½ | 2020 | C65 | Carlsen Tour Final 2020 | 7.7 |
Please, wait...
Links