The Cockroach’s Carapace (and other opening disasters)

by Jonathan Speelman
7/19/2020 – Remembrances of his first chess books, analysis of a World Championship game, backstories from a Candidates Match and a ‘squashed’ Caro-Kann are all part of the latest column by Jonathan Speelman. The former world number four confesses: “Opening theory has never been my thing, and I was perhaps lucky to be active at a time when it was much less essential”. | Photo: David Llada

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

A squashed tarakan

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

When I was little, I had a row of chess books on a shelf above my bed. Of course I can’t remember all of them, but several are very clear.

After learning the moves of chess from my cousin on Boxing Day (December 26th) 1962, my first chess book was Chess for Children by Bott and Morrison, which gave me the basics.

My first-ever serious chess book though was Bob Wade’s account of the 1963 World Championship match between Mikhail Botvinnik and Tigran Petrosian. My mum bought it for me in Edgware Road presumably — the match ran from March to May — in the summer of 1963. With a distinctive dark red cover once it lost its jacket (I can see it on a shelf now)  I’ve enjoyed re-reading and dipping into it ever since. Some of the games — especially Petrosian's epic king march in game 5 — are truly memorable.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4       g6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.e3 0-0 6.Be2!? dxc4 6...c5 6...e6!? /\ ...b6, ...Bb7 7.Bxc4 c5 8.d5 e6?! 8...a6!? 8...Nbd7 9.dxe6 Qxd1+ 10.Kxd1 Bxe6 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.Ke2
Although this is really only about equal, in his book on Petrosian (half way down page 136) Viktor Vasilieiv quotes Petrosian as saying to his second Igor Boleslavsky that "If Botvinnik goes into this line, he will lose". 12...Nc6 12...Nd5!? 13.Nxd5 13.Ne4 Na6 13...exd5 14.Rd1 Rd8 15.Ng5 Na6 16.Ne6= 13.Rd1 Rad8? >= 13...Kf7! /\ ...Ke7 Flohr 14.Rxd8 Rxd8 15.Ng5 Re8 16.Nge4 Nxe4 17.Nxe4 b6 18.Rb1= Nb4!? /\ 19.a3 (19.Bd2) Nd5-f6= 19.Bd2! Nd5 19...Nxa2? 20.Ra1 Nb4 21.Bxb4 cxb4 22.Rxa7 Bxb2 23.Rb7± 20.a4 Rc8 21.b3 Bf8 /\ 22...c4 23.Rc1cxb3 24.Rxc8 b2 25.Rc1 bxc1Q 26.Bxc1= 22.Rc1
22...Be7? >= 22...Rc7 23.Ng5 Re7 24.e4 Nf6 25.Bc3 e5 26.f4± 22...a6 Tal 23.b4 c4 24.b5 axb5 25.axb5 Be7 23.b4!± c4? 23...Rc7 24.bxc5 bxc5 24...Bxc5 25.Ng5 [25.Nxc5] 25.Kd3 /\ 26.a5, 27. Kc4 +/-/+- 23...Kf7 24.b5! Kf7?+- 24...Ba3 25.Rc2 c3! e.g. 26.Bxc3 26.Nxc3 [26.Bc1] Nb4 26...Bb4 27.Kd2 27.Kd3? Bxc3 28.Nxc3 Nb4+! 27...Rc4 28.Bxb4 28.Kd3 Rxe4! 28...Rxe4 29.Bd6 Rxa4= Averbakh 25.Bc3! Ba3 26.Rc2 /\ 27.Nd2, 28.Be5 Nxc3+ Now with the knight resplendent on e4, White's advantage has solidified. 26...Ke7 27.Be5! /\ Nd2 +- 27.Rxc3 Bb4 28.Rc2 Ke7 28...e5 29.Nd2 c3 30.Ne4 Ke6 31.f3 h6 32.Kd3 Rd8+ 33.Kc4 Rd2 34.Kb3 Rxc2 35.Kxc2 Kd5 36.Kd3! c2 37.Kxc2 Kc4 38.Nd2+! Bxd2 39.Kxd2+- (PK) 29.Nd2! c3 29...Bxd2 30.Kxd2 Kd6 31.Kc3 Kc5 32.Rd2!+- 30.Ne4 Ba5 31.Kd3 Rd8+ 32.Kc4 Rd1 32...Rd7 33.Kb3+- 32...Rd2 33.Kb3 doesn't help 33.Nxc3+- 33.h3 33...Rh1?! >= 33...Bxc3!? 34.Kxc3 Rh1 35.h3 Kd7 /+/- 34.Ne4! Rxh2 35.Kd4 Kd7 35...Rxg2 36.Rc7+ /\ 37.Rxh7, 38. Ke5 +- 36.g3 36.g4?! h5! 37.g5 h4∞ 36...Bb4 37.Ke5 Rh5+ 37...Be7 38.Rd2+ 38.Kf6 Be7+ 39.Kg7! e5 40.Rc6! Rh1
The famous adjourned position. 41.Kf7! Ra1 41...Rh5 42.g4 Rh4 43.Re6 Bd8 44.Rd6+ 42.Re6! Bd8 42...Bc5 43.Rxe5 Rxa4 44.Nxc5+ bxc5 45.Rxc5+- 42...Bb4 43.Nf6+ Kc8 44.Rxe5 Rxa4 45.Re4 /\ 46.Nd5 +- 43.Rd6+ Kc8 43...Kc7 44.Ke8+- 44.Ke8! Bc7 45.Rc6 Rd1 45...Rxa4 46.Nc3 /\ 47.Nd5 +- 46.Ng5 Rd8+ 47.Kf7 Rd7+ 48.Kg8
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Petrosian,T-Botvinnik,M-1–01963D94World Championship 25th5

Later, I got Euwe and Kramer’s two-volume work on the middlegame, Bent Larsen’s Selected Games 1948-69 and Peter Clarke’s book on Mikhail Tal (which annoyingly, although I can see at least five other books on Tal, I can’t at the moment bring to hand).  

And a couple of years later, I beat some 200ish ECF (2200ish) player in a simultaneous display at Foyles (the famous book shop on Tottenham Court Road) and won a whole selection of books from Pergamon Press, including Vladimir Vukovic’s wonderful The Art of Attack in Chess and a book on Petrosian by Alberic O’Kelly de Galway — the Belgian count who as an arbiter at some team competition in the 1970s once attempted to get the England team captain David Anderton to “order” myself and Jonathan Mestel to get our hair cut!

The Pergamon Tranche also included A Complete Defence to 1.P-K4, a study of the then backwater, the Petroff, by Bernard Caffery and David Hooper. Though our main opening bible in the English speaking world at that time was Modern Chess Openings.

I had the tenth edition (1965, completely revised by Larry Evans under the editorship of Walter Korn). Chess theory was then still very rudimentary compared to today, and there was a wonderfully whooly quote about the Yugoslav Attack against the Dragon which went, “Black must react  promptly and vigorously — just how is not quite clear”. I also found the 8th, 11th and 13th editions on my shelves. By the 11th (Walter Korn, 1972), defences had been found against the Yugoslav.

Opening theory has never been my thing, and I was perhaps lucky to be active at a time when it was much less essential. But of course I know lots of general information and in a few lines I was either a trail blazer (quite possibly losing track of the line later) or one of the main protagonists.

As White, these tended to be sneakily wimpy ways to try to get the advantage without having to learn the complexities of the then main lines. For instance, 6.a3 in the Symmetrical English, while it wasn't of course a novelty, was new to me when I played it against Jan Timman in the Reykjavik World Cup in 1988 and has since become the main line, slightly surpassing 6.g3 in number in recent games.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 46/53 c5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Nc6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e6
6.a3!? 6.g3 - 46/(53) d5 7.cxd5 exd5 8.Bg5 Be7 8...Bc5 9.e3 0-0 10.Bb5! 10.Be2 Qb6= 10...Bg4 10...Qb6? 11.Bxf6! 10...Bd7 11.0-0 11.Qa4 Nxd4?! 11...Ne5 12.Qxd4 a6 13.Bd3 Qd7 14.0-0 Rad8 15.Rac1 Bf5?! 16.Rfd1 Bg4 17.Rd2 Qe6 18.h3 Bh5 18...Bf5? 19.Bxf5 Qxf5 20.Bxf6! Bxf6 21.Nxd5! 19.Qh4 Bg6? 19...Qe5! 20.Bxg6 hxg6 21.Rcd1± Rd6 22.Qa4 Rfd8 23.Qb3 R6d7 23...Rb6 24.Qa2 24.Rd4 24.Bxf6? Bxf6 25.Nxd5 Bxb2! 26.Nf6+?? Bxf6 27.Qxe6 Rxd2! 28.Rxd2 fxe6 24...Kf8 25.R1d2 b5 26.Qd1 Qf5 27.h4 27.Bxf6 Bxf6 28.Rxd5 Rxd5 29.Nxd5 Bxb2 30.Nc3‼ Houdini 27...Qe6
28.e4? I gave this a ? but Houdini likes it. 28.Bxf6 Bxf6 29.Rxd5 Rxd5 30.Nxd5 Bxh4 30...Bxb2?? 31.Nc7 31.g3 Be7 32.Nxe7 Rxd2 33.Nxg6+ 28.g3  >>f6 28...Bc5! 29.exd5 Qe5 30.Bxf6? 30.R4d3 30...gxf6 31.Re4 Qd6 31...Qf5 32.g4 32.Qf3 f5 33.Re1 Re7 34.Rde2 Rxe2 35.Rxe2 Bd4 36.g3 Kg8 37.h5?! 37.Kg2 Bxc3= 37...Kg7? 37...gxh5 38.Qxh5 Qxg3+! 38.hxg6 Qxg6 39.Rd2 Qf6 40.Ne2?! 40.Nd1! 40...Bxb2 41.Nf4 Qc3! 42.Qh5! 42.Rd3? Qe1+ 43.Kg2 Qe4 42...Rh8! 43.Qg5+ Kf8 44.Qd8+
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Speelman,J2645Timman,J2660½–½1988A33Reykjavik

But perhaps the best known instance was against Nigel Short in our first Candidates Match. When a couple of weeks after Mikhail Gurevich introduced it on the Russian Championship, I was lucky enough to be able to play 10.0-0-0 in the Bf4 Queen's Gambit  

This had been published in a Norwegain newspaper which Marianne, my second Jonathan Tisdall's then girlfriend (and now ex-wife), had bought on the way here. And I was able to play it before Nigel or his second John Nunn were able to see it in Schachwokke.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 0-0 6.e3 c5 7.dxc5 Nc6 8.Qc2 Bxc5 9.a3 Qa5
10.0-0-0!? Although I was the second person ever to play 0-0-0 (after two games by Gurevich) I don't follow the line at all nowadays. But I have included the two stem games. Be7 10...Ne4!? 10...dxc4 11.Bxc4 Be7 12.g4 b5 13.Bxb5 Bb7 14.Nd2 Nb4 15.axb4 Bxb4 16.Nc4 Qa1+ 17.Kd2 Bxc3+ 18.Ke2 Qa2 19.Ra1 1-0 (19) Gurevich,M (2630)-Sokolov,A (2600) Moscow 1988 11.g4 Rd8 11...Ne4!? 12.h3 a6 N 12...dxc4 13.Rxd8+ Nxd8 14.Bxc4= 12...Bd7 13.Nd2 h6 14.Be2 Rac8 15.g5 Ne4 16.Ndxe4 dxe4 17.Nxe4 Ne5 18.Rd4 Bc6 19.Rhd1 Ng6 20.Rxd8+ Rxd8 21.Rxd8+ Bxd8 22.Bg3 Qe1+ 23.Bd1 Qh1 24.Qd2 Be7 25.Bd6 Qxe4 26.Bxe7 Qxc4+ 27.Bc2 Qf1+ 1/2-1/2 (27) Gurevich,M (2630)-Kharitonov,A (2550) Moscow 1988 13.Nd2
13...e5? 13...b5 14.cxd5! 14.cxb5? axb5 15.Bxb5 Bd7 14.g5 Nh5! 15.cxd5 exd5 16.Nb3 Qb6 17.Nxd5 Rxd5! 18.Rxd5 Nxf4 19.exf4 Be6 14...Nxd5 15.Nxd5 Rxd5! 15...exd5?! 16.Qxc6 Bf5 17.Nb3! 17.Bc7? Rac8! 17.gxf5? Rac8 18.Qxc8 Rxc8+ 19.Kb1 Bf6! 17...Qa4 18.gxf5 Rac8 19.Bc7 Qxb3 19...Bd6? 20.Nc5! 20.Bg2!± 16.Kb1 Qb6 16...Rc5? 17.Nb3 17.Bg2 Rc5 18.Qd3 Nunn,J 14.g5! Ne8 14...Nh5 15.Bh2!± 14...Ne4 15.Nb3 Qxc3 16.bxc3 Bxa3+ 16...Bf5 17.Kb2 17.Kb1 Bf5 18.Ka2! 18.Bd3? dxc4 19.Bxe4 cxb3 18...Bb4 19.Bxe5! +/= 15.Nb3!? 15.Nxd5!? exf4 16.Nb3 Rxd5! 17.cxd5 Qa4!? 17...Qb6 - 15.[]b3 15...Qb6 16.Nxd5 Rxd5 17.cxd5 exf4 18.dxc6 fxe3 19.fxe3! (+)f7, ><f Bxg5 20.Kb1 bxc6!? 20...Bf6 21.Bc4 Qxc6 ><c 21.Bc4!± Ra7 22.Rhf1 Bf6?
22...Re7 23.Nd4± 23.Qe4!+- Kf8 23...Re7 24.Qxe7! Bxe7 25.Rxf7+- 24.Qxh7 g6 25.e4 c5 26.e5 Bg7 27.e6  27...>>e6 g6
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Speelman,J2645Short,N26651–01988D37London (m/3)

As Black I tend to like to maintain my pawn structure, and have for many years had a love/hate relationship with the Caro-Kann or “Cockroach” (a mild joke — the  Russian for cockroach is tarakan). It’s an opening which works splendidly if White gives any quarter, since your position is intrinsically sound and eventually, once you’re developed, then the extra centre pawn on e6 may come to the fore.

However, if White is suitably dismissive — and able to back up his or her scepticism with sufficient kinetic energy — then even the cockroach may get squashed as in this game against the great Misha Tal: the only one I lost while qualifying from the Subotica Interzonal in 1987.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 Blatny,P c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Bc4 Ngf6 6.Ng5 e6 7.Qe2 Nb6 8.Bb3 h6 9.N5f3 a5 10.a3 Be7 N; 10...g6 - 43(173) 11.Bd2! Nbd5?! 11...c5 12.c4 Nc7 13.Bc2
13...0-0? '?!' Blatny,P. JS Pulling the tiger's tail! 13...b5 14.Ne5 Bb7 15.c5 Ncd5 16.Ngf3± 14.Ne5! '!?' Blatny,P. Qxd4 15.Bc3 15.0-0-0 Bxa3!∞ 15...Qd8 16.Ngf3 16.Rd1! Qe8 17.Qd3  []g4 '+/=' Blatny,P. g6 16...Nce8 17.g4! b5 18.g5! 18.Nxc6!? Qc7 19.cxb5± 18...hxg5 19.Nxg5 Ra6 20.Qf3 b4 21.Qh3! g6 21...bxc3 22.Bh7+ Kh8 23.Nexf7+ Rxf7 24.Bg6+ Kg8 25.Bxf7+ Kf8 26.Qh8+ Ng8 27.Qxg8# 22.Bxg6 bxc3 22...fxg6 23.Nxg6 Kg7 24.Qh7# 23.Nexf7 Qd2+ 24.Kf1 Rxf7 25.Bxf7+! 25.Nxf7? Kf8! 25...Kg7 26.Rg1  1/4h8# 26.Qh8+ Ng8 27.Bh7 Nef6 28.Rg1 Bc5! '~~!' Blatny,P. 25...Kg7 26.Rg1
26...Qxg5 26...cxb2 27.Nf3+ Ng4 28.Qxg4+ Bg5 29.Rb1 Qd3+ 30.Kg2+- 27.Rxg5+ Kxf7 28.bxc3! 28.Qxc3 Ne4 29.Qf3+ N8f6  []d2 28...e5? And I resigned not waiting for Qxc8. Exactly what Black's hubris deserved.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Tal,M2605Speelman,J25501–01987B17Subotica (izt)


The Fashionable Caro-Kann Vol.1 and 2

The Caro Kann is a very tricky opening. Black’s play is based on controlling and fighting for key light squares. It is a line which was very fashionable in late 90s and early 2000s due to the successes of greats like Karpov, Anand, Dreev etc. Recently due to strong engines lot of key developments have been made and some new lines have been introduced, while others have been refuted altogether. I have analyzed the new trends carefully and found some new ideas for Black.


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

marek1969 marek1969 7/21/2020 04:44
Long road White King in the game Petrosyan -Botwinnik !
Jack Nayer Jack Nayer 7/20/2020 10:28
Also, O'Kelly "de Galway" was not a Belgian count.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 7/20/2020 01:55
KevinC, thank you for your comment.
My main problem is that in the analysis (which part is Jon Speelman's and which part is the automated chessbase commentary?) there seems to be no connection between the punctuation and the conclusions. But I agree with your variations after 24... Ba3: a rook quite often beats the light pieces in the endgame when there are just pawns, as you can only move one piece at a time.
TimSpanton TimSpanton 7/20/2020 09:44
I hate to be picky, but Foyles is on Charing Cross Road. However, Tottenham Court Road tube station is fairly close. https://beauchess.blogspot.com/
KevinC KevinC 7/19/2020 11:44
@Frits Fritschy, I am not sure what you mean by “According to the comments, white made the best possible moves.” Yes, mostly, and he punished black for making those questionable moves. Maybe the following will help.

Sometimes a mistake might not be a pure mistake to a computer, but it can be a practical mistake because it gives your opponent a clear plan. Chess players tend to make more mistakes when they have choices to make.

13...Rad8 was definitely a mistake since from a practical point of view, it was important to stop Ng5, or at least, be prepared for it. Black’s one real problem is the Pe6, so patience by delaying Rad8, and first playing either Kf7-e7, or even h6, was called for, and would have made the defense much easier. As played, the remaining black rook was passive on e8. White had a definite edge after Rxd8 Rxd8 Ng5.

Instead of 22…Be7, it might have been better to simply side-step the pin with something like 22…Rd8. Again, it was simply more practical to take away white’s one clear threat. As it turned out, white was able to artificially isolate the black c-pawn, and ultimately win it.

23…c4? was a clear error per modern engines. It just loses the pawn by force. The Averbakh analysis contains a mistake and after 24…Ba3; 25. Rc2 c3; 26. Bxc3 Bb4; 27. Kd2 Rc4; 28. Kd3! Re4; 29. Ke4 is better for white after both 29…Bc3; 30. Kd3 Be1 31. Kd4 and e4 next; or 29…Nc3+; 30. Kd4 Na4; 31. Rc4 Bc5+; 32. Ke5 Nb2; 33. Rc2 Nd3+; 34. Kxe6 Nb4 (only move); 35. Rd2 since white is very active. Black still may find a way to hold, but it is unpleasant.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 7/19/2020 10:40
I don't get it. In the Petrosjan-Botvinnik game, 13... Rad8, 22... Be7 and 23... c4 all get question marks. According to the comments, white made the best possible moves. The verdict after 23 b4 [exclamation mark!] is +/-, big advantage for white. How come that according to the comments (not just the computer evaluation) 24... Ba3 leads to equality?
1
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.