Grenke Classic: Carlsen widens the gap

by Antonio Pereira
4/27/2019 – The standings table at the 2019 GRENKE Chess Classic was seriously shaken up after Magnus Carlsen defeated Georg Meier and Vishy Anand lost against Arkadij Naiditsch in round six. Vishy gave up a pawn in the early middlegame and could never get enough compensation, while Magnus got a winning advantage before the time control but needed close to six hours to finally get the point. The rest of the games were drawn. | Photo: Georgios Souleidis

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

"I know I should be happy"

Magnus Carlsen has not lost a single one of his last 56 classical games and stands a full point ahead of the field at the GRENKE Chess Classic, but after getting his third win of the event he confessed his concern about the deterioration of his play. It might sound exaggerated, but for those who followed the round live it actually sounds understandable — after showing great play in the opening and middlegame, the world champion struggled to find a way to finish Meier off efficiently.

In the end, Carlsen got the point after 58 moves and almost six hours of play. Once again, the Norwegian was part of the longest game of the round, something that "it's definitely getting to me", as he stated in his post-game interview with Jan Gustafsson. Although he knows he should be happy for the result, he also added:

I misplayed it but I got lucky. [...] I was so tired, I couldn't calculate any more.

GRENKE Chess Classic 2019

Round six underway in Baden-Baden | Photo: Georgios Souleidis

In the game, Magnus got a better position right out of the opening. The world champion was critical of Georg's plan to put his knight on b5, a manoeuvre that cost the German two tempi but that only left him with a good-looking piece on the queenside:

 
Meier vs. Carlsen
Position after 14...Ra6

The computer does not consider Meier's plan after 15.a3 a8 16.b5 to be incorrect. And in the next ten moves the knight jumped around three times until capturing the black pawn from a5, via a7-c6. By that time, however, Black had correctly assessed that expanding on the centre and co-ordinating his pieces gave him more than enough compensation for the lost soldier on the side of the board. White's retreating 27th move illustrated Black's dominance:

 
Position after 26...Ndf6

Meier saw it necessary to play 27.e1, already down on time and aware of the fact that, despite the material advantage, he would need to defend an inferior position against the strongest player in the world. 

Georg Meier

Meier is having a tough time in the event | Photo: Georgios Souleidis

Carlsen kept improving his pieces, but on move 31 gave Meier a chance to untangle:

 
Position after 30...d4

The Norwegian described Meier's 31.e3 as "pretty suicidal", and precisely at that moment the computers evaluated 31.♘e3 as an equalizing attempt, with the idea of 32.♘ex4 the next move, finally harmonizing White's pieces. After this missed chance, it seemed like a matter of time before the German player would resign, but Carlsen did not find the most accurate continuation shortly afterwards:

 
Position after 34.Rc1

The game continued 34...xc1+ 35.xc1 xa4, but Magnus could have played 34...♝xb4 instead (or even 35...♝xb4 after the exchange of rooks), a manoeuvre that he confessed he had not even considered, which in his words "is pretty insane", especially given the fact that he had analysed 34...♝g7. 

When the time control was reached, Black had a pawn on d2 and White's defensive task looked daunting, but it was not all that clear how to break through...Magnus did not seem to find the right setup and Georg kept using time on his clock to find the most resourceful manoeuvres. 

But in the end, Black managed:

 
Position after 58...Qe4

Meier resigned, as Black's knight is going to f3 and the mating threats are impossible to parry.


Full interview with Magnus Carlsen


Winning with the Four Knights

Arkadij Naiditsch won the second edition of the GRENKE Classic, an eight-player single round robin with an all-German line-up. The following year, in 2015, he tied for first with Carlsen after defeating the world champion in their classical encounter — Arkadij lost the rapid/blitz/Armageddon tie-break, however. This year, the Azeri representative was on an even score before the sixth round — after losing against Svidler and beating Keymer — and went on to defeat co-leader Vishy Anand with the white pieces.

Naiditsch played the Four Knights Opening but Anand was the first one to leave theory:

 
Naiditsch vs. Anand
Position after 11.Re1

Vishy deviated from a 2015 game between Rublevsky and Bacrot with 11...c7 and provoked Arkadij to think for over 17 minutes before responding with 12.g5. Black gave up a pawn but seemed to have enough compensation to fight on. However, Naiditsch was ruthless in avoiding his opponent to get play and got the point when his knight had infiltrated into enemy camp:

 
Position after 30.Nxg7

Here Vishy resigned.

Arkadij Naiditsch

Naiditsch is now sharing second place with five other players | Photo: Georgios Souleidis

The three remaining games finished drawn, with Levon Aronian and Vincent Keymer fighting the longest to split the point. Out of a Sicilian, a rather quiet setup was established on the board. For a while, it seemed like Aronian was going to be the one pressing, but soon enough the Armenian overestimated his chances and found himself on the defending side. Sadly for Keymer, however, he could not get his second win of the event.

Meanwhile, Peter Svidler and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave seemed to be heading towards a big fight, until they got to a standstill that resulted in a 35-move draw. Finally, Francisco Vallejo Pons had the white pieces against Fabiano Caruana and went into a line that allowed Black to force a draw after giving up a rook. Paco talked about how hard it is to prepare against such strong opposition:


Round-up show

Merijn van Delft recapped the action from Round 6


Standings after Round 6

Loading Table...

All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 g6 4.Nc3 d6 5.e4 Bg7 6.Nf3 0-0 7.Be2 e5 8.0-0 Ne8 9.Ne1 f5 10.exf5 gxf5 11.f4 E92: King's Indian: Classical: 6 Be2 e5: 7 dxe5, 7 Be3 and Petrosian System without 7...Nbd7 Nd7 11...e4 12.Nc2 Na6 13.Be3 Nac7 14.Rf2 a6 15.a4 Bd7 16.g4 Bxc3 17.bxc3 fxg4 18.Bxg4 Nf6 19.Bxd7 Qxd7 ½-½ (43) Cruz,F (2344)-Rojas Keim,L (2330) Sant Aria de Besos 2017 12.Nd3 e4 13.Nf2 White is slightly better. 13.Ne1 feels hotter. Nc7 14.Nc2 Qe7 15.a4 Nf6 16.Bd2 13...Bxc3 14.bxc3 Ndf6 15.Be3 Ng7N Predecessor: 15...Qe7 16.h3 Ng7 ½-½ (48) Edwards,R (2013)-Turner,D (1832) High Wycombe 2011 16.Qe1 Bd7 17.Nd1 Ba4 18.h3 Bxd1 19.Qxd1 Qe8 20.Kf2 Qg6 21.Rg1 White should play 21.g4± 21...Kh8 22.a4 Rg8 23.Qf1 Nfh5 23...h5!= 24.g3 Raf8 25.Qg2 25.Rg2! 25...Qf6!= 26.Rac1 Qd8 26...Nxg3= 27.Qxg3 Nh5 28.Bxh5 Rxg3 29.Rxg3 Qh4 27.Qh2 Nf6 28.g4 Nd7 29.g5 Qa5 30.g6 30.Qh1± 30...h6 30...Nf6= keeps the balance. 31.Rb1 Rb8 32.Qg3 Qh4! is the strong threat. Qd8! 33.Ke1 33.Ra1 33...Ne8 34.Kd2 34.h4= 34...Nf8! 35.Bf2 Qe7 36.Ke3 36.h4 36...Qf6 Don't do 36...Nxg6 37.Bh5 36...Rxg6-+ 37.Qh4 Qg7 37.Kd2 Nxg6 38.h4 Ne7 39.Qh3 Rxg1 40.Rxg1 Qf7 41.h5 Nf6 42.Bh4 b6 43.Rb1 Qf8 44.Rg1 Qf7 45.Rb1! Qg7 46.Rg1 Qf8! 47.Kc2 Nfg8 48.Kd2 Qf7 49.Kc2 Rf8 50.Kd2 Qe8 51.Ra1 Rf7 52.a5 bxa5 53.Rxa5 Nc8 54.Ra1 Qf8 55.Rb1 Nb6 56.Rg1 Rg7 Better is 56...a5 And now ...a4 would win. 57.Rb1 Rb7 57.Rxg7!= Kxg7 58.Qg3+ Kh8 59.Qg6 a5       60.Bf1 a4 61.Kc2 a3       Black has some pressure. 62.Kb3
62...Na4!       63.Bh3 63.Kxa4 a2 63...Qg7 64.Qxg7+ Kxg7 65.Bxf5       Endgame KBB-KNN Nf6 66.Kxa3 Nxc3 67.Bf2? 67.Kb3= Ne2 68.Bxf6+ Kxf6 69.Bxe4 67...Ne2 68.Ka4? 68.Kb2 was the crucial defense. 68...Nxh5-+ 69.Ka5 Nf6 70.Kb6 Kf7 71.Kc7 Ke7 72.Be3 Nd4 73.Bg6 intending f5. h5 74.Bf2 Nf3 75.Bf5 75.Kb6 Ng4 76.Bxe4 Nxf2 77.Bxf3 75...Nd2 76.Bh4 e3 77.Bd3
77...Nf3! 78.Bxf6+ Kxf6 79.Kxd6 h4 Black mates. 80.Kc7
80...Nd4! 81.Kc8 e2 Accuracy: White = 48%, Black = 61%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Keymer,V2516Carlsen,M28450–12019A566th GRENKE Chess Classic 20191.1
Svidler,P2735Caruana,F2819½–½2019B346th GRENKE Chess Classic 20191.2
Vachier-Lagrave,M2773Anand,V2774½–½2019B126th GRENKE Chess Classic 20191.3
Aronian,L2763Naiditsch,A2695½–½2019B906th GRENKE Chess Classic 20191.4
Meier,G2628Vallejo Pons,F2693½–½2019A066th GRENKE Chess Classic 20191.5
Vallejo Pons,F2693Carlsen,M28450–12019C786th GRENKE Chess Classic 20192.1
Anand,V2774Keymer,V25161–02019B906th GRENKE Chess Classic 20192.2
Caruana,F2819Vachier-Lagrave,M2773½–½2019B236th GRENKE Chess Classic 20192.3
Naiditsch,A2695Svidler,P27350–12019C686th GRENKE Chess Classic 20192.4
Meier,G2628Aronian,L2763½–½2019B526th GRENKE Chess Classic 20192.5
Carlsen,M2845Anand,V2774½–½2019A226th GRENKE Chess Classic 20193.1
Svidler,P2735Meier,G26281–02019C116th GRENKE Chess Classic 20193.2
Keymer,V2516Caruana,F28190–12019E166th GRENKE Chess Classic 20193.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2773Naiditsch,A2695½–½2019C676th GRENKE Chess Classic 20193.4
Aronian,L2763Vallejo Pons,F2693½–½2019C116th GRENKE Chess Classic 20193.5
Caruana,F2819Carlsen,M2845½–½2019B346th GRENKE Chess Classic 20194.1
Naiditsch,A2695Keymer,V25161–02019B236th GRENKE Chess Classic 20194.2
Aronian,L2763Svidler,P27351–02019C886th GRENKE Chess Classic 20194.3
Vallejo Pons,F2693Anand,V27740–12019B116th GRENKE Chess Classic 20194.4
Meier,G2628Vachier-Lagrave,M27730–12019D906th GRENKE Chess Classic 20194.5
Carlsen,M2845Naiditsch,A2695½–½2019A296th GRENKE Chess Classic 20195.1
Anand,V2774Caruana,F2819½–½2019C676th GRENKE Chess Classic 20195.2
Vachier-Lagrave,M2773Aronian,L2763½–½2019C886th GRENKE Chess Classic 20195.3
Svidler,P2735Vallejo Pons,F2693½–½2019C556th GRENKE Chess Classic 20195.4
Keymer,V2516Meier,G26281–02019D376th GRENKE Chess Classic 20195.5
Vallejo Pons,F2693Caruana,F2819½–½2019C486th GRENKE Chess Classic 20196.1
Naiditsch,A2695Anand,V27741–02019C486th GRENKE Chess Classic 20196.2
Meier,G2628Carlsen,M28450–12019A056th GRENKE Chess Classic 20196.3
Aronian,L2763Keymer,V2516½–½2019B236th GRENKE Chess Classic 20196.4
Svidler,P2735Vachier-Lagrave,M2773½–½2019A346th GRENKE Chess Classic 20196.5
Vachier-Lagrave,M2775Vallejo Pons,F26981–020196th GRENKE Chess Classic 20197.1
Keymer,V2516Svidler,P2735½–½2019E156th GRENKE Chess Classic 20197.2
Carlsen,M2845Aronian,L27631–02019D376th GRENKE Chess Classic 20197.3
Anand,V2774Meier,G26280–12019C106th GRENKE Chess Classic 20197.4
Caruana,F2819Naiditsch,A26951–02019E016th GRENKE Chess Classic 20197.5
Vallejo Pons,F2693Naiditsch,A2695½–½2019D306th GRENKE Chess Classic 20198.1
Meier,G2628Caruana,F28190–12019B316th GRENKE Chess Classic 20198.2
Svidler,P2735Carlsen,M28450–12019B306th GRENKE Chess Classic 20198.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2773Keymer,V25161–02019B226th GRENKE Chess Classic 20198.4
Aronian,L2763Anand,V2774½–½2019C656th GRENKE Chess Classic 20198.5
Naiditsch,A2695Meier,G26281–02019A106th GRENKE Chess Classic 20199.1
Caruana,F2819Aronian,L2763½–½2019C896th GRENKE Chess Classic 20199.2
Carlsen,M2845Vachier-Lagrave,M27731–02019A376th GRENKE Chess Classic 20199.3
Keymer,V2516Vallejo Pons,F26930–12019A616th GRENKE Chess Classic 20199.4
Anand,V2774Svidler,P2735½–½2019C846th GRENKE Chess Classic 20199.5

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.