Carlsen @ Google

by ChessBase
1/23/2014 – On January 16, while visiting California, Magnus Carlsen stopped over at the Google headquarters, where he gave a simul to ten lucky participants, and a chat with Art Levinson, CEO of Calico, a new Google company. Freeman Ng, one of the players, provided a report, with the generous contributions of other players and attendees, who sent their commented games and pictures.
Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

by Freeman Ng

On January 16, 2014, Magnus Carlsen, the newly crowned world chess champion and the highest rated player in history, paid a visit to Google headquarters in Mountain View, CA, to give a talk and play a ten-board simultaneous exhibition. His ten opponents were basically chosen randomly, by taking the first ten employees to respond to an announcement email, and I was lucky enough to be watching my inbox at the time!

Magnus Carlsen is prepared for the event, and equipped
with a body mike for the mid-simul chat

Art Levinson, Aaron Gershenberg, and Magnus Carlsen before the games start. Aaron
Gershenberg is a managing partner of Silicon Valley Bank, and it is not his first time
with Carlsen. In late 2012, he spoke with him on what the game had taught him.

Carlsen walked from board to board making his moves. When he got to each person's board, that person would have to make his move right then so as not to slow down the event. This gave us very little time to think, as Carlsen pretty much played his moves instantly, and it got worse as players lost their games and he had fewer and fewer boards to visit. One player joked in email the day before that we should spread the tables far apart so the world champion would have to spend more time walking!

Panna Chowdhury, Daniel Felix, Lawrence Ip, and Ali Tamur

Don Burnette, Freeman Ng, Thorsten Brants, Eric Schwelm, Matthew Kelcey,
and Kenton Born. Magnus said that while Ali played the best game, Kenton
was the most courageous player - for playing the Scandinavian against him!

Finally, the games got started...

... and the players had their hands full.

For Magnus Carlsen, it was business as usual

As the results trickled in, the pace accelerated. The day before the players had joked that
they should space out the tables more to force Magnus to take more time between moves.

Carlsen went 10-0 with only one close game, against the highest rated player (2168) among us. I had no chance in my game, but thoroughly enjoyed it. What I wanted most was to have some real play (as opposed to blundering early and being done from the start) and to make him think at least once in the game, and as you'll see in my game notes, I got both wishes! The wish I didn't get was to mount an attack against him, but it was actually very educational seeing how he snuffed out any possibility of an attack before I could even dream of it.

Magnus Carlsen deciding on his move against Freeman Ng

Carlsen's game against Freeman Ng with comments by Freeman. He explains that the comments are entirely based on his own understanding and experience of the game:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
C63: Ruy Lopez: Schliemann/Jaenisch Defence 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 f5 A rarely seen opening because it's not really that good, and a terrible choice for the likes of me to play against a grandmaster, since it can lead to very complicated, tactical positions, but it's what I normally play, and I had decided to die as I lived. Magnus paused briefly before replying with the quietest continuation. 4.d3 Nf6 5.0-0 This took me out of my book. Oddly, it also takes Deep Junior, the chess engine I used to analyze this game, out of its book. Whether this is really a non-book move or not, it seems, along with 4. d3, very Carlsenesque: he avoids modern cutting edge opening moves that push for every last bit of advantage, and instead plays simple developing moves that just get him into the middlegame where he feels his natural strength will be enough to get the win. He's basically giving up some opening advantage in order to avoid possible opening tricks by his opponents. (And in order to not have to work so hard studying openings.) I believe this is a pretty new and radical approach at the championship level of chess, but it's made possible by a simple fact: Carlsen might be the only player in the world strong enough to make it work! Bc5 6.exf5 Carlsen takes the gambit pawn. Deep Junior has him up by 0.48, only half a pawn, at this point, even though he should be up by that one whole pawn plus a little more for white's natural advantage for moving first. One way of looking at the discrepancy is that I've obtained almost a pawn's worth of play from my sacrifice. Will I be able to do anything with it? 0-0 7.Be3 Bb6 8.Bxc6 dxc6 So far, according to Deep Junior, I haven't played any bad moves, but on the other hand, there have always been multiple good moves available, so the odds were better that I would happen to play one of them. It rates either recapture here roughly the same, for example, so there wasn't a wrong choice here. 9.Nxe5 Bxf5 10.Nc3 Qe8 I was wanting to swing the Queen over to the kingside, but even as I played the move, I realized that all the squares it might swing to were covered at the moment, and I was suddenly worried about having my Queen sitting exposed on the open file. Deep Junior says I'm still okay, though. 11.Bxb6 Qxe5 This was the first time there was one clearly best move, and I'm happy that it's the one I chose. I would have lost about a quarter pawn's worth of ground if I had taken the bishop. I don't actually understand why taking the knight was better, especially since bishops tend to be thought of as being slightly more valuable than knights. At the time, I thought this might be a way to get my Queen to the kingside, but that turned out not to be possible after all, so I was just lucky to make the right choice but for the wrong reason. 12.f4 Ah, I see now! It was purely tactical. White chases the queen off the c7-g3 diagonal and wins a second pawn with Bxc7. Well, I can see how Carlsen might have preferred maintaining containment of my pieces to winning a doubled pawn. Yet, Deep Junior now has white's advantage at less than a quarter of a pawn. 12.d4 Qf4 13.Ne2 12...Qd6 13.Be3 Nd5 angling to eliminate the bishop, and I did in fact consider the rook move initially, but then I got it into my head that it might be nice to force an exchange on d5 to undouble my pawns. I should have thought more about the landscape that would obtain in the aftermath of that! 13...Rae8 13...Ng4 14.Qd2 Deep Junior says Carlsen should have taken the knight to prevent it from taking his bishop... Rae8 ... and that I should now (of course) have taken the bishop. Instead, I forced him to do what he should have done in the first place! 15.Nxd5 cxd5 Deep Junior says recapturing with the queen was slightly better - so eliminating the doubled pawns turned out not to be that valuable a goal after all. 16.Bd4 This was the most memorable move of the game for me. At first, I didn't understand it, and then I realized where the bishop was going! That was a truly wonderful moment, partly because of the beauty of the smallness of the move compared to the big effect it will eventually have, and partly because it helped me to experience a way of looking at chess positions that was a bit more advanced than I was used to. I think I might have become a slightly better chess player in that moment! c5 I knew I couldn't stop the next move, and decided my best chance from here on out was to try drumming up counterplay on the queenside. 17.Be5 The big move I saw coming with dread and delight. But I'm a little disappointed that Deep Junior still has white up by less than a pawn at this point, because at the time, I felt like this was a crushing move and the game (or at least the fun part of the game) was now over for me. The bishop dominates the board, and *can't ever be dislodged* because I have the wrong color bishop and no knights. Qc6 just to get rid of the bishop, but I guess I overreacted, since Deep Junior still thinks I'm in the game. The MC who was doing commentary mentioned the value of opposite colored bishops for holding draws in the endgame, and maybe that's why the engine evaluation is not so bad, but during the game, I was much more worried about the advantage that opposite colored bishops can give to the attacker! Could this be one of those cases where the human evaluation differs from the computer's because the human can see that the bishop can stay there forever and affect every corner of the board, while the computer only sees that the bishop can stay there as far ahead as it can look? Or is the bishop just not as powerful as I think? 17...Rxe5 18.Rae1 b5 While I carry on with my queenside plans... 19.h3 ...Carlsen begins his own kingside action. d4 Carlsen appeared at my board and I played this move, the second of two instances in the game of a single best move that I managed to find (though this one's much more obvious to me than the last one: before I can play c4 to try and open some lines on the queenside, I have to prevent the d3 pawn from advancing in response) and then, rather than reply instantaneously as he'd been doing all game (except for his very brief pause after 3. ... f5) he spent about ten seconds thinking things over! It was the biggest thrill of my chess playing life. 20.b3 I'm guessing what he spent all that time thinking about was whether he needed to do something to slow me down before getting on with his kingside attack, and I'm oddly pleased that he decided he did need to do something! a6 This was the first of three essentially random moves I made in the game, in positions where I needed to do a lot of thinking but before I could even get started Magnus was standing there and I had to move. I supposed this does do *some* good in that it makes both itself and its neighbor pawn safer, but really, it was essentially a "pass". Fortunately, Deep Junior considers it roughly as good as several other possibilities. But I was not as lucky the next two times! 21.g4 Bd7 22.f5 which forces me to either swap queens or diminish my own queen's scope and let him line up more heavy artillery behind his pawn storm. However, the move he played is not bad either, and it had the virtue of totally confusing me: I flat out failed to see that it opened the way for Qg5, and went into a little panic trying to figure out what was going on, and then suddenly, there was Magnus again at my board and I had to play *something*. 22.Qg2 22...Rd8?? The losing move because it lets him force an exchange of queens and win a second pawn in the deal. But even aside from that, what was I thinking, removing my rook from the open file? My fleeting, partial thought at the time was that my pawn on d4 needed protection before I could push c4. Here's the very clever alternative suggested by Deep Junior: 22...Qd5 23.Qh2 Bc6 What I didn't notice during the game was that f5 also weakened the bishop I had once thought an immovable object, so now it can be threatened, allowing my queen and bishop to reconfigure themselves into much more active positions. White is still better by that less-than-a-pawn margin that has persisted through most of the game, but at least I've still got plenty of play. I doubt I could have found this on my own, though, even if I had had much longer to think about it. The moment when Deep Junior showed me this maneuver was the second big educational moment that arose from this game for me. 23.Qg5 Qh6 24.Qxh6 gxh6 25.Bd6 Rfe8 26.Bxc5 I considered resigning after this, but the player next to me happened to say at that point that he was about to be mated, and so I decided to wait until after he lost his game to lose mine! Bc6 27.Rxe8+ Here (as well as on the previous and next moves) Deep Junior says f6 would have been even better. I was surprised Carlsen let me have the e file. Rxe8 28.Bxd4 Re2 And I get a rook to the seventh rank against Magnus Carlsen! (But all it's going to do is chase the white king where it wanted to go anyway.) 29.Rf2 Re1+? 29...Rxf2 30.Kxf2 Kf7 Okay, Deep Junior, I believe you when you say that this would have been objectively better, but I'm lost anyway, and there was no way I was letting go of my rook. That rook represented my continued presence in the game! 30.Kh2 Rh1+ 31.Kg3 Rg1+ 32.Kf4 Rh1 Carlsen lets me have a pawn so he can take over the e file and infiltrate with his rook. I accepted the deal because of, you know, my irrational attachment to my rook. Moving it back to e1 to resume guarding the e file would only have resulted in it being challenged by Magnus' rook and traded off eventually. 33.Re2 Rxh3 34.Re6 h5 The final "random" move. I had no idea what to do about the rook's attack, which was way more powerful than I thought it would be, so when it was time to move, I had no candidate moves in my head except this one that I'd thought about earlier. 35.Rxc6 1-0. I thought Carlsen had been moving "instantaneously" earlier, but when he saw me play this move, before he was even fully standing in front of the board, his hand shot out like a striking rattlesnake to snap off my bishop! 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2872Ng,F-1–02014C63Google Simul

Ali Tamur, the highest rated player among the participants shared his impressions:

Ali Tamur was the highest rated player in the simul. It bears mentioning that
this is not the first time he appears in ChessBase News. He authored an article
in 2009 called, "Refined Chess – a new proposal to combat draws"

It was a simultaneous event with ten boards. As far as I know, there were no other players with a 2000+ rating. As soon as the games started, a guy from Carlsen's team took the microphone and began to discuss the ongoing games, make jokes and so on, which was probably more fun for the kibitzers. Still, the whole event was more like an exhibition than a serious chess event.

After Carlsen made his 25th move, it was announced that it was time for the questions-and-answers and the games would continue afterwards. Carlsen took the stage. I was going to skip this and go on thinking about the game, but it would not look nice since we were just in front of him. Imagine Carlsen answering questions and some guy in front him has his back to him, looking at his board. I sighed and forgot about the game as I listened to him.

Art Levinson then sat down for a chat with Magnus. Art Levinson is a former
director of Google (2004-2009), and is now the CEO of Calico, an independent
biotech company established in 2013 by Google Inc. with the stated goal of
focusing on the challenge of combating aging and associated diseases.

Guess what one of the topics was

The conference was entertaining and Carlsen was confident, funny and candid. He claimed his rating would be about 2750 if he played blindfold in tournament conditions, only about 2500 in a simultaneous event like this and he would be about 2700 if he had a couple of drinks, he explained the lack of women in the top by their lack of killer instinct, said he was not worried by any opponent that he might face in the next world championship match and repeated his conviction that as long as he played his best he would beat anyone, and in answer to a question about god's rating, he suggested the god has better things to do than play chess, but since we and the computers understood chess so little he could not think of a limit.

It came down to just Ali and Magnus. You don't really have any doubts on what
the result was, right?
About our game, I think it went as well as I could hope for, with only ten boards I had to think much faster than I'm used to and many times my moves were backed more by hope than calculation. As the games progressed, there were fewer boards left, and the level of my my play went downhill. The last twelve to fifteen moves were played one on one where I had no chance regardless of the position in the board.

Pictures generously provided by Umesh Nair and Md Arifuzzaman Arif

Games commented by the players:

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.d3 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.a4 Rb8 9.axb5 axb5 10.Nbd2 0-0 11.Re1 Be6 12.c3 Qd7 13.d4 Bxb3 14.Nxb3 I was more worried about 14.Qxb3 where I was planning to play 14. ... b4 but was not sure whether the knight is misplaced or not after 15.d5 bxc3 16.Qxc3 Nb4. The engines seem to agree with Carlsen's choice Ra8 Thank god, 15.d5 Rxa1 is fine 15.Bg5 h6 16.Bh4 Rxa1 17.Qxa1 d5?! 18.Bxf6?! The engines suggest 18. exd5 Qxd5 19.dxe5 with an almost winning advantage for white, so, yes, when he spends 3 seconds per move, he sometimes makes mistakes Bxf6 19.Nc5 Qd6 20.exd5 Qxd5 21.Ne4 Be7 22.c4 I would probably miss this move even in a long game, I don't know if it is particularly good but I was very impressed how he played this within a second. He may even be planning it by 18th move Qxc4 23.dxe5 I was expecting 23.Rc1 where 23. ... Qd5 24.Nc3 should be good for white. Luckily, after 23. ... Qd3 there is no immediate disaster, for example 24.Rxc6 Qxe4 25.Rxc7 Bd6 Rd8 24.h3 Nd4 Most games had ended at this point and I did not have time to analyse Nb4. When under stress my reflexes always prefer exchanges and calm positions 25.Nxd4 Qxd4 I think black should even be a little better here 26.e6 I was hoping for 26.Ng3 Bc5 27.Re2 Qf4, which is very optimistic. These top players never yield the initiative like that fxe6 27.Qa6 Qd5? Qe5, Qc4 or even Qd7 would be good for black 28.Nc3 Qc4 29.Qxe6+ Qxe6 30.Rxe6 Bf6 31.Nxb5 Rd1+ 32.Kh2 Bxb2 33.Nxc7 Rd7 34.Nb5 Rd5 35.Rb6 Be5+ 36.g3 Bd4? After 36. ... Rd2 37.Kg2 Rb2 even I should be able to draw 37.Rb8+ Kh7 38.Kg2 Bc5 39.Nc3 Rf5 40.Ne4 Be7 41.Rb7 Re5 42.Kf3 Rf5+ 43.Kg4 Re5?? 44.Kf4 Re6 45.Kf5 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Magnus Carlsen2872Ali Tamur21681–02014Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Daniel Felix19001–02013Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Lawrence Ip18501–02013Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Don Burnette-1–02014Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Thorsten Brants-1–02014Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Eric Schwelm-1–02014Magnus@Google
Magnus Carlsen2872Mat Kelcey15001–02014Magnus@Google
Magnus,C2872Born,K17001–02014Magnus@Google

Click on the drop-down menu to see all the games

About the author

Freeman Ng is a software engineer at Google and a writer on the side. His writing projects include a novelization of the life of Joan of Arc and a daily haiku site where he has posted one new haiku a day since July, 2010. You can find all his writing online through his home page, www.FreemanNg.net. He plays chess online under the (brand new) username ... LostToCarlsen!
Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.