Tournament of Peace: Trouble with Fischer

by André Schulz
4/9/2020 – After 18 months in hiding Fischer is back and in the two events he has played since his return to the chess arena he has shown superb chess. But only in a four-game match and a blitz tournament. Now, at the Tournament of Peace in Rovinj/ Zagreb things get serious and Fischer has to show if he is indeed the best. However, the opening ceremony in Rovinj did not go smoothly. | Photo: turnir-mira

No other World Champion was more infamous both inside and outside the chess world than Bobby Fischer. On this DVD, a team of experts shows you the winning techniques and strategies employed by the 11th World Champion.

Grandmaster Dorian Rogozenco delves into Fischer’s openings, and retraces the development of his repertoire. What variations did Fischer play, and what sources did he use to arm himself against the best Soviet players? Mihail Marin explains Fischer’s particular style and his special strategic talent in annotated games against Spassky, Taimanov and other greats. Karsten Müller is not just a leading international endgame expert, but also a true Fischer connoisseur.

Trouble with Fischer – again

For 18 months Bobby Fischer has been hiding from the chess scene but now he's back with a vengeance. In the "Match of the Century" in Belgrade, USSR against the "Rest of the World" that recently ended, Fischer won 3-1 against Tigran Petrosian. Two wins, two draws. Everybody knows how difficult it is to beat the former world champion. Fischer did it twice.

Some of the players stayed in Yugoslavia after the match and accepted an invitation to play a blitz tournament in Herceg Novi. Before this tournament Fischer had not been known as a particularly strong blitz player. But he dominated the event from beginning to end and won with 19/22, 4.5 points ahead of runner-up Mihail Tal. While the other players gave lessons to Yugoslavian chess fans before and after the tournament Fischer gave the best players of the world a lesson. The spectators reverently called him the "terrible Bobby".

The only player who managed to win a game against Fischer in blitz was Viktor Kortschnoi. After the blitz tournament some of the participants travelled from Herceg Novi to Rovinj to participate in the "2nd Tournament of Peace". The first "Tournament of Peace" was played five years ago, in 1965, in Zagreb. GM Wolfgang Uhlmann from East Germany and GM Boris Ivkov from Yugoslavia shared first prize.

This year the tournament celebrates the 25th anniversary of the United Nations and the World Chess Federation FIDE recognized it as a grandmaster tournament. Thus, lower ranked players have a chance to make the coveted GM-norms.

Until now FIDE has given the grandmaster title to 104 players but 16 of them are already dead. Currently, there are 88 grandmasters in the world, the oldest is the 73-year-old Friedrich Sämisch from West Germany, the youngest is the 18-year-old Soviet talent Anatoly Karpov.

Voices from Soviet chess circles claim that Karpov is indeed an exceptional talent. However, Mikhail Botvinnik, the "Patriarch of Soviet Chess" is said to have been much less flattering and supposedly advised against a career in chess when reviewing a number of games by Karpov. Time will tell.

18 players take part in the tournament, ten from Yugoslavia, eight from abroad.

The non-Yugoslavian players

Kortschnoi (USSR), Petrosian (USSR), Smyslov (USSR), Browne (USA), Fischer (USA), Hort (Czechoslovakia), Uhlmann (GDR), Ghitescu (Romania)

The Yugoslavian players

Bertok, Gligoric, Ivkov, Kovacevic, Kurajica, Marovic, Minic, Nicevski, Parma, Udovcic

The first eleven rounds of the tournament will be played in Rovinj, a small, quiet seaside resort on the Istrian peninsula.

Rovinj (Yugoslavia)

Then the tournament moves to Zagreb, where the remaining six rounds will be played.

At the opening ceremony when the lots were drawn Fischer created quite a stir. He demanded to ignore the usual procedure of drawing the lots and to pair the three Soviet grandmasters against each other in the first rounds.

Of course, there is a background story to Fischer's demand. Eight years ago, at the Candidates Tournament in Curacao, the then 19-year-old Fischer felt betrayed by the Soviet players. In Curacao three – Petrosian, Geller and Keres – of the five Soviet players in the eight-player tournament apparently had agreed to a non-aggression pact and played short draws against each other to save strength and energy and to make sure that Fischer would not win the tournament – had he done so he would have played a world championship match against Botvinnik, something Soviet officials wanted to avoid desperately.

After Curacao Fischer had sworn never again to participate in a tournament under such conditions. Well, Petrosian, the winner of Curacao who had dethroned Botvinnik in 1963, is here though without his title which he lost to Spassky in 1969. But Geller and Keres do not play in Rovinj and Kortschnoi vehemently assured that the alleged arrangements back then were also directed against him.

The organizers pointed out to Fischer that this was not an official tournament and asked the American whether he wanted to participate or not. Fischer was silent. He drew the number 18 and the organizers left it to the headstrong American to think about whether he wanted to play or not.

Fischer and Minic during the drawing of lots | Photo: Sindik

But the Czechoslovakian grandmaster Vlastimil Hort looked rather worn out. When asked whether he was ill, he answered cryptically: "I was at a simultaneous in Ogulin. From Ogulin we took the car. A long drive. And things happened to me that nobody would believe. Maybe I'll tell them later, in 50 years or so."

Fischer was the talk of the town in Rovinj. Does he have what it takes to become world champion? The result in Belgrade against Petrosian was nice, but after all it was only a short match. Four games, nothing more. And the tournament in Herceg Novi was only a blitz tournament, as impressive as Fischer's result might be. But journalists and spectators agree that Fischer has to show his mettle now, at the tournament in Rovinj-Zagreb.

We are trying to get a connection to Rovinj. Maybe we will have live-commentary in some of the rounds. In the meantime, we will broadcast the games of the current rounds by telex every day. All rounds start at 5 pm daily, the first round is scheduled for April, 9.

Translation from German: Johannes Fischer

Links

 


André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

branx branx 4/14/2020 10:45
In description above - Fischer and Minic during the drawing of lots | Photo: Sindik - it is wrong, it is Marovic with Fischer not Minic.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/13/2020 04:39
@fgkdjlkag

"To malign someone because he or she had mental illness is detestable."
I totally agree. Fischer's comments were unacceptable in many cases indeed, but that does not nullify his genius play.

@Isledoc

"To suggest that he needed psychiatric help is not maligning him at all merely stating the obvious. "
I assume that fgkdjlkag agrees that Fischer needed psychiatric help. I certainly agree. I do not debate that statement. I strongly disagree with advocating the avoidance of coverage about a chess grandmaster - world champion, no less - because of his ugly comments outside the board, which is even worse if we take into account the fact that he is no longer alive to defend himself against such attacks.

I agree with your last statement in your previous comment though.
Isledoc Isledoc 4/13/2020 05:11
@fgkdjlkag.You guys just like to insult anybody who has a different opinion on their hero. No they were my own opinions not some rehashing of opinions!Nobody ever changed a person's mind by insulting them as somebody once said.
What on earth has Fischer's facility at learning languages ( he learnt Russian to read their chess magazines) to do with anything? He was not a cultured man by all accounts and his reading mirrored his strange personality.To suggest that he needed psychiatric help is not maligning him at all merely stating the obvious.
Anyway ,enough said RIP, great chess player love his games unfortunate upbringing and maybe not adults around to curb his behaviours during his adolescence produced the tragic person he ended up being.
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 4/13/2020 01:20
"Fischer never developed a view of life outside of chess. He divided the world into patzers and non patzers and his most enjoyable moments were when he saw his opponents ego crack ,as he notably stated.He never realized that there was probably a lot more to the individuals he played than the 64 squares of the chessboard."

@Isledoc, this seems to be a rehashing from the media pieces of the day, but is in contrast to ppl who met him. Look at Susan Polgar or Yasser Seirawan's comments. Besides this, he reportedly developed fluency in several languages and was widely read. To malign someone because he or she had mental illness is detestable.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/12/2020 11:27
@KingZor

"But his virulent antisemitism hardly gets a mention in these articles. It is not a matter of "political correctness" to oppose on who advocates the slaughter of innocent people. It is a matter of human decency. And if you can't see that, then you have a serious moral blind spot."

In this discussion nobody admires Fischer's antisemitism and hatred, hence you are using a straw man. He had some very ugly comments, but here nobody seems to agree with those. So, if you cannot stop hating, of course, we will have to tolerate your comments. Believe me, if you play some brilliant games in the meantime, then we will not censor them just because of your hatred against Fischer.

Bottom line: This debate is about having the moral right or whatever right to write about a person with poor mental health, who happened to be world champion. We are not debating about his views, however, suggesting a chess news site not to write about one of the chess world champion because of his views and because many things are more important than chess is a ridiculous position. If many things are more important than chess, then maybe you want to focus on those. If chess still has some importance for you, at least as much as to visit this website (assuming that your visit here is not only about hatred against Fischer), then you should at least understand that we value good chess games and Fischer had a tendency to produce them. Believe me, if Fischer was only hating about Jews and his chess games would have been forgettable, than nobody would speak about him now. Hence, the reason we speak about him is that he was a brilliant chess player. And if that means that you think that we have a serious moral blind spot, then so be it.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/12/2020 11:21
@Isledoc My position in this debate is not about Fischer being "the best". I merely say that he was a brilliant chess player and as such, his games are worthy of analysing and his chess activity of the early 70 is very interesting. You can skip all the articles about Fischer if you like, but please, do not attempt to put pressure on journalists not to write about Fischer.

"Let us focus on the many great players out there with great achievements to read about in their professional and personal lives rather than spending time continually on this very disturbed individual who needed psychiatric help."

Let's understand this correctly. You are presenting writing about Fischer as something which prevents the possibility of writing about other players and you present the two as a choice, which is, of course a logical fallacy. Have you read the recent articles about Lékó, Steinitz or Dake? Those are great writings and their existence proves that articles about Fischer and other great players can exist at the same time and that your point about choosing between Fischer and everybody else is baseless.

Again: You do not have to read the articles about Fischer, but let these articles exist.
Isledoc Isledoc 4/12/2020 02:56
@saturn23 -'People appreciate what he did for chess',yes he confirmed the stereotype of the chess genius as some crazed loner! Magnus Carlsen's feat of going undefeated in the age of computer analysis is a more remarkable achievement. In terms of popularizing chess, Garry Kasparov for instance has done a great deal with his instructional books and endless advocacy for the game. Vishy Anand has hugely promoted the game to millions of people in India and is one of the main reasons that the country over the last years has produced many talented players.
Fischer never developed a view of life outside of chess. He divided the world into patzers and non patzers and his most enjoyable moments were when he saw his opponents ego crack ,as he notably stated.He never realized that there was probably a lot more to the individuals he played than the 64 squares of the chessboard.
saturn23 saturn23 4/11/2020 07:07
@KingZor - Again, it doesn't matter if Fischer did not play a single game as a World Champion. What matter is that destroyed top players by a huge difference (6-0, 6-0, etc). He took the title from the Soviet chess school. The Soviet players had much better resources than Fischer but they did not stand a chance against him.

Kasparov never won 20 consecutive games in a row. He never beat a top player with 6-0. He dominated because he had much better resources than any other player (he had teams of 4-5 grandmasters working for him while many other players could not afford a second, he got the newest computer software and game databases in the 80's while almost all other players used books and magazines, etc.). The difference between Fischer and Kasparov is that Fischer did almost everything by himself (with some exceptions), while Kasparov got a huge amount of help. And Fischer still shined brighter!

Why does this "Fischer adulation" bother you so much? People don't "adulate" Fischer because of his antisemitism. Fischer is part of the chess history and people appreciate what he did for chess. Should we just stop talking about Fischer because of some things he said? In that case we should stop talking about many historical and political figures that directly contributes to the death of a huge amount of people. In fact we should stop talking about the human race altogether, because we drove to extinction not only a large number of animal species but also humans like us.
fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 4/11/2020 06:56
@KingZor, so every article about Fischer needs to give a warning that he had mental illness? Ridiculous!
KingZor KingZor 4/11/2020 05:33
@saturn23 - My concern is the degree of Fischer adulation that occurs here, and as can be seen from other commentators, I am not the only one to notice it. True, one can not be a chess fan or study chess without encountering Fischer (although the "most dominant modern player" was unquestionably Kasparov. One does not "dominate" chess by playing zero games as champion). But his virulent antisemitism hardly gets a mention in these articles. It is not a matter of "political correctness" to oppose on who advocates the slaughter of innocent people. It is a matter of human decency. And if you can't see that, then you have a serious moral blind spot. It is possible to cover Fisher's chess career while at the same time making no bones about his racist views. I've seen it done by other authors. I wish there was more of that on this site instead of one article of blind adulation after another.
Isledoc Isledoc 4/11/2020 05:23
Fischer was the most dominant player for quite a short period between 1970 and 72 prior to that he had a negative score against Spassky who beat him in the Siegen Olympiad of 1970, I believe. Contrast that with our last champions who have been willing to stand up and defend their title over many gruelling battles.Look at the kasparov-karpov matches.
There is no evidence that Fischer had other players in mind when he wanted better prize money otherwise he might have continued playing and using his public prominence to continue to advocate on chess player's behalf.The life of a professional chess player I imagine is still a hard slog.Yes he helped to create a spike in interest for the game but this soon ended as did his interest in defending his title.
Nobody is hating just calling for Fischer not to be idolized .Let us focus on the many great players out there with great achievements to read about in their professional and personal lives rather than spending time continually on this very disturbed individual who needed psychiatric help.
Jarman Jarman 4/11/2020 05:08
I like these articles as they often include little-known information and pictures. On the other hand Fischer's views are widely known, but I have no trouble focusing just on what he did as a chessplayer.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/11/2020 11:46
@KingZor

"Some things--many things--are more important than chess."
That's true in general, but false on a chess news site. For a chess news site chess is the most important. If you find Fischer to be a disgrace, then you do not have to read the articles about him, but you probably knew about this as well.

@chessgod0 and @saturn23
I couldn't agree more with both of you. Fischer's unfortunate comments and mental state in his later years are sad. But erasing, even censoring his brilliancy can only come from a judgement clouded by political correctness and the whole modern madness with safe spaces and things like that. I disagree with Fischer's opinion on 9/11 and about Jews, but I like his games. He was a brilliant guy, a mad genius.
saturn23 saturn23 4/11/2020 08:55
@KingZor - as far as I know this is a chess website. Chessbase publishes articles about Bobby Fischer, the chess player. This article is about Fischer playing a chess tournament, not about some unfortunate thing Fischer said.

It's true that Fischer said some unfortunate things but he never killed anyone. Most people say unfortunate things at one point. Hundreds of millions of people believe in the "word" of the Bible, a book that promotes slavery and the punishment of gay people, among other things. Hundreds of millions of muslins believe that the people who leave Islam should be killed. USA is a country founded on genocide and slavery. How is Fischer worse that the US presidents that caused the unnecessary death of millions of innocent people? If you think Fischer is a horrible person then you have no idea in what kind of world you live in. Get over it.

Calling Fischer a disgrace to chess is laughable. He had a huge impact on chess, more than any other player in the last 100-150 years. He set records that will probably never be equaled. He was the most dominant modern chess player. He open the road to professional chess. He made chess popular. He inspired millions of people to play chess. Many consider Fischer the greatest chess player ever. The fact that he retired, by choice or by force, doesn't undermine his legend.

Stop hating! It's not good for your health. Get used to the fact that you will see more articles about Fischer on this website.
chessgod0 chessgod0 4/11/2020 03:22
I love the Fischer articles---keep them coming! I do not care about his politics or about political correctness more generally.
KingZor KingZor 4/10/2020 06:10
I have to agree that the amount of Fischer worship on this site is becoming disturbing. Great games do not make a great person. Some things--many things--are more important than chess. And it is not a matter of "political correctness." He was a disgusting racist who cheered the death of thousands on 9/11 and advocated the slaughter of Jews. And he was the worst world champion ever. After winning the title, he did nothing with it. He was a disgrace to the title and a disgrace to chess.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/10/2020 09:25
I'm not sure why people are bashing Fischer so many years after his death. He was an extraordinary player, even if, from the safe spaces of some very sensible people, their political dislike of Fisher's views takes precedence over his talent. Let's forget political correctness and all that nonsense and focus on chess, if possible.
Isledoc Isledoc 4/10/2020 03:26
when one was a teenager in 1972 one saw Fischer as very cool fighting the Ruskies and playing great chess but as one grows older and reads more one sees what an awful person he was on many levels. Maybe it is time for chess players to stop idolizing him and ignoring the many unsavoury aspects of the man and I do not need to enumerate these.Boris Spassky was a true gentleman in putting up with his gamesmanship.Thankfully we now have a world champion we can admire and recommend as a role model to the young and who takes the time to promote the game in a positive way.
herr_doktor herr_doktor 4/10/2020 12:50
All real chess players have an unhealthy Fischer obsession.
saturn23 saturn23 4/9/2020 09:12
@gerker Many people enjoy these historical articles. Fischer is a legend!
furtom furtom 4/9/2020 08:39
@gerker

Oh, come on. All in good fun.

It's rather a clever idea. What else do chess news sites have to write about under the circumstances?

Don't worry, I'm sure if this goes on, we'll get to Karpov-Kasparov, etc.
geeker geeker 4/9/2020 03:32
IMO Chessbase has an unhealthy Fischer obsession.
1