Throwback Thursday: Carlsen wins the Candidates

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
2/18/2021 – Now that FIDE has announced that the second half of the Candidates Tournament will be played in April, it’s a good time to remember how Magnus Carlsen qualified to play for the World Championship title for the first time, in 2013. The Norwegian was the favourite and started strong, but Vladimir Kramnik made an impressive comeback in the second half. The Russian, however, fell barely short at the very end, and Carlsen won the tournament on tiebreaks. | Photos: Ray Morris-Hill

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

A double round robin

After many years of FIDE — under Presiden Kirsan Ilyumzhinov — promising but not finding a way to create a stable and fair World Championship cycle, a big step forward was given in 2013, when the Candidates Tournament was organized as an 8-player double round robin. Magnus Carlsen, who was already the highest-rated player in the world, had twice rejected to participate in Candidates matches previously, but now agreed to take part, arriving in London as the clear favourite.

The tournament took place in the Institution of Engineering and Technology in Savoy Place, a historic building in England’s capital, from March 15 to April 1. The main sponsor was the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), and the prize fund shared by the players totalled €510,000.

Levon Aronian, Vladimir Kramnik, Boris Gelfand

Levon Aronian, Vladimir Kramnik and Boris Gelfand in good spirits

FIDE Candidates 2013 chess

The playing hall

Carlsen and Aronian start strong

While a 22-year-old Carlsen was the favourite, there were doubts regarding his ability to show his best under such pressing circumstances. Moreover, pundits and fans had many reasons to consider Vladimir Kramnik and Levon Aronian completely capable of outperforming the young Norwegian due to their experience in similar competitions.

Carlsen and Aronian drew their first-round encounter, and both won two out of their next three games, becoming the early co-leaders. They continued to fight neck and neck until reaching halftime, with both getting one more win in round 6. The co-leaders had a 1½-points lead over Kramnik and Peter Svidler after round 7.


Standings after round 7

FIDE Candidates 2013 chess


Levon Aronian

Levon Aronian

Replay all six decisive games played by Carlsen and Aronian in the first half of the tournament with expert analysis.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 c5 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nc3 g6 4.e3 After the humble draw in the first round, Aronian tried to reach the goal with less-known theory. Nf6 5.d4 cxd4 6.exd4 d5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Qb3 Nxc3 9.Bc4 Nd5 9...e6 is also possible 10.bxc3 Bg7 10.Bxd5 e6 11.Bxc6+ bxc6 12.0-0 Be7 12...Qd5 13.Qc3 f6 I think this idea is also quite wholesome for Black. 14.Bf4 g5 15.Bg3 Be7 16.Rfe1 Kf7 17.Rac1 Bb7 18.Re3 Rhe8 0-1 Pantsulaia,L (2575)-Short,N (2698)/ Istanbul 2012/CBM 151 (42) 13.Be3 Qd5 14.Rfc1! Levon starts demonstrating a very high technique. It's still much to fight, but the opened lines for both rooks and the good knight against the passive white-squared bishop gives White a stable advantage. Qxb3 15.axb3 Bb7 16.Ne5 0-0 17.Ra4 Rfd8 18.Nc4 Bf6 19.Na5 Rd7 20.Rb4 Ba6 21.Nxc6 Rb7 22.h3 Kg7 23.Rxb7 Bxb7 24.Ne5 Bd8 25.b4 Rc8? The fatal mistake! Gelfand misses a very delightful trick, which directly decides the game. The black pieces lose coordination like a painting of Picasso. The king is cut off from the game and the black-squared bishop has nowhere to go after g4. Instead of an extra pawn, Aronian still would have worked a lot to prove something in case of 25...Bd5 26.Bh6+! Kg8 26...Kxh6 27.Rxc8 Bxc8 28.Nxf7+ Kg7 29.Nxd8+- 26...Kf6 doesn,t work because of the same motive 27.Bg5+! 27.Rxc8 Bxc8 28.Nc6 Bf6 29.b5 Bd7 30.g4 g5 31.h4! gxh4 32.g5 Bxc6 32...Bg7 33.Bxg7 Kxg7 34.Nxa7+- 32...Bh8 33.Ne7# 33.bxc6 Bd8 34.Kg2 Bc7 35.Kh3 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Aronian,L2809Gelfand,B27401–02013FIDE Candidates2
Gelfand,B2740Carlsen,M28720–12013FIDE Candidates 20133
Ivanchuk,V2757Aronian,V28090–12013Candidates3
Carlsen,M2872Grischuk,A27641–02013FIDE Candidates 20134
Svidler,P2747Carlsen,M28720–12013Candidates6
Radjabov,T2793Aronian,L28090–12013FIDE Candidates6

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

Kramnik’s comeback

By then, the whole narrative of the event was focused on whether the young favourite would manage to outscore Aronian, who had broken the 2800-rating barrier back in 2010 and had been considered as a major contender to get the world title for many years. 

But the second half was all about Kramnik, who won 4 out of 5 games from rounds 8 to 12, only drawing Carlsen from the white side of a Catalan in that interim — in round 12, the Russian defeated Aronian by playing a Semi-Tarrasch Defence with the black pieces. In the meantime, the Armenian star had also lost his encounters against Boris Gelfand and Peter Svidler.

Going into the penultimate round, Kramnik was in fact the sole leader. But he was caught up by Carlsen, who beat Teimour Radjabov after the latter cracked under pressure in a minor-piece endgame.

The two top seeds reached the final round sharing the lead, with their closest pursuers unable to catch them. It was a two-horse race.


Standings after round 13

FIDE Candidates 2013 chess


Vladimir Kramnik

Vladimir Kramnik | Photo: Pascal Simon

Replay all decisive games played by Carlsen and Kramnik from rounds 8 to 13.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Nf3 c5 8.Be3 Qa5 9.Qd2 Nc6 10.Rc1 cxd4 11.cxd4 Qxd2+ 12.Kxd2 0-0 13.d5 Rd8 14.Kc2 Ne5 15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bc4 Bd7 17.f4 Bd6 18.Kb3 f6 19.a4 Rdc8 20.h4 Rab8 21.Bb5 Bxb5 22.axb5 a6 23.b6 Kf7 24.h5 Rxc1 25.hxg6+ Kxg6 26.Bxc1 Rg8 27.g4 h6 28.Rh5 Kf7 29.e5 Bc5 30.e6+ Kf8 31.Rh4 Kg7 32.f5 Rd8 33.Bxh6+ Kg8 34.Kc4 Bxb6 35.g5 Bf2 36.Rg4 Kh7 37.gxf6 exf6 38.e7 Rc8+ 39.Kb3 Bc5 40.Rc4 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Kramnik,V2810Svidler,P27471–02013FIDE Candidates8
Grischuk,A2764Kramnik,V28100–12013FIDE Candidates10
Carlsen,M2872Gelfand,B27401–02013FIDE Candidates10
Kramnik,V2810Radjabov,T27931–02013FIDE Candidates11
Aronian,L2809Kramnik,V28100–12013FIDE Candidates12
Carlsen,M2872Ivanchuk,V27570–12013FIDE Candidates12
Radjabov,T2793Carlsen,M28720–12013FIDE Candidates13

A dramatic final round

Some criticism to the regulations of the tournament was voiced once it was clear how the winner would be decided in case of a tie for first place. The first criterion, which has always been well-received by players and fans alike, was the head-to-head score among tied players. In this case, Carlsen and Kramnik had drawn both their games, so the second criterion would be decisive — the number of wins achieved by each player (or the number of losses, as critics of the system pointed out).

Carlsen had won one more game than Kramnik. The players were tied in points, but the Russian was undefeated with one round to go, while the Norwegian had lost against Vasyl Ivanchuk in round 12. Therefore, a tie would give Carlsen tournament victory; furthermore he had the white pieces in the last round (against Svidler) while Kramnik had black (against Ivanchuk).

The odds were in Carlsen’s favour, but the outcome would have more to do with how the players behaved in this unique, highly-tense situation, as Jeff Sonas explained:

So everything hinges upon the outcome of those two games. It is possible to simulate millions of possibilities, and to quote odds of each player winning the tournament. But these are not as trustworthy because the two games are not independent: obviously Carlsen and Kramnik will be paying close attention to each other’s games, and certainly adjusting their own plans accordingly.

Nerves were at breaking point, and both players ended up losing their games. Carlsen had gained the right to challenge Vishy Anand for the World Championship title.


Final standings

FIDE Candidates 2013 chess


Magnus Carlsen

Carlsen at the press conference, while Ivanchuk and Kramnik were still playing

Replay the two games that the co-leaders lost in the final round, analysed by grandmasters Mihail Marin and Daniel Gormally.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
The 2013 Candidates tournament in London, had the most exciting denouement of any tournament I can remember. The brilliant Norwegian Wunderkind Magnus Carlsen, was eventually to stagger over the line, after a war of attrition and nerves that will live in the memory for many years. But it was the Russian Vladimir Kramnik who will perhaps feel most aggrieved - he did not lose a game until the last round, a game we shall now analyse, and his chess was of a very high quality indeed. There are a lot of ifs and buts, but I would not criticise the format. One player had to qualify, and if there had not existed the tie-break format, and the tournament had gone to play-offs, perhaps you would have had a much more cautious approach from the players, resulting in the veritable bore-fest which was the previous candidates. Clearly this tournament format is the way forward. 1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 Kramnik essays the Pirc, a surprising choice you might think in such an important encounter. But going into the game he must have felt that he needed to win, as he could hardly have expected Carlsen to lose with White to Svidler, so perhaps he felt that his normal repertoire was too solid, and that a sharper game was needed. However I have little doubt that if such a situation were to arise again, Kramnik would not choose this opening. Readers with a good memory, may recall that the Pirc has a mixed success rate in last round games at the world championship level. Famously, Korchnoi was to be thoroughly routed when he chose this defence against Karpov in the decisive last game of their 1978 Baguio match. It is my belief that a player should stick with the approach that has brought them to this point in the first place, and not change at the last moment when on the brink of success. If you are a strategic and positional player like Kramnik or Korchnoi, you should not play the Pirc, you should stick to what you know, even if there is a danger that the game will be too dry to play for a win. But that it is just my thought and I will never play a match for the world championship! 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0 a6 7.h3 Nc6 8.Bg5 Already we are in fairly unexplored territory. 8.d5 tries to "punish" Black for his loss of time, but White was unable to prove any advantage here either. Nb8!? 9.a4 e5 10.dxe6 Bxe6 11.Nd4 Bd7 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bh4 Nc6! 14.Nxc6 Bxc6 15.Bd3 Re8 16.Re1 Qc8 17.Qd2 Nd7 18.Rad1 Nc5 and Black had comfortably equalised in the game Khalifman,A-Svidler,P Tilburg 1994, which later ended in a draw. 8...b5! Gaining some useful space, while creating a threat of ...b4. 9.a3 h6 10.Be3 e5!? A firm and commital decision, but it does create some weaknesses on the queenside, like the c5-square for example. Black might ideally like to play 10...Nd7 so that he can recapture on e5 with a piece, but the problem is that this runs into 11.d5! Nce5 12.Nxe5 12.Nd4!? Bb7 13.f4 c5 14.Ndxb5! axb5 15.Bxb5 is also good for White 12...Nxe5 13.f4 Nd7 14.Bd4 with a nice edge for White. 11.dxe5 11.d5?! Ne7 is really what Black wants. He can then look forward to very good King's Indian style play, with ...Nh5 followed by ...f5 ect. White is not helped in such structures by the fact that he has already played h3, which just gives Black an additional target on the kingside. 12.Nd2 c6 13.dxc6 Nxc6 14.Nd5 Nxd5 15.exd5 Ne7 16.c4 f5! 17.f3 Qd7 looks more than ok for Black. 11...dxe5 12.Qc1 Kh7 13.Bc5 Re8 14.Rd1 Bd7 15.b4 Qc8 16.Qe3 Nd8 17.a4 White is fighting for space for his pieces. He wants to put the bishop on c4, and also just to attack the black queenside. 17.Nd5 gets nowhere after Nxd5 18.Rxd5 Bc6 19.Rd2 Ne6 17...bxa4 18.Nxa4 Ne6! 19.Bc4 Kramnik's last turn smartly took advantage of the fact the e5-pawn is immune: 19.Nxe5? Nxc5 20.Qxc5 Nxe4 is not what the doctor ordered. 19...Nh5 20.Nc3 Nhf4 21.Nd5 Ivanchuk wants to challenge Kramnik's strong knight play in the centre, with some of his own. Serious consideration could have been given to 21.Bf1 creating an eventual threat of g3. Nxc5 22.bxc5 Ne6 with the threat of ...Nd4. 23.Nd5! sidesteps that threat, but even here play is not so clear after a5 21...Bb5!? 22.Bb3 22.Bxb5 axb5 23.Rxa8 Qxa8 only looks good for Black, he has his army very harmoniously posted, while he can start to pester White with moves like ...Qa2. 22...Bc6 Around about here Kramnik already started to think about taking over the initiative. One can only imagine the emotions raging through the players at this point, with so much at stake. Did Kramnik need to play for a win, or a draw? He was keeping a close eye on proceedings in the Carlsen encounter, which perhaps distracted him from his own game. 23.Ra5 Qb7 24.g3 Ivanchuk wants to force matters. Nxh3+ 25.Kg2 Nhg5 26.Rh1 Kg8 Jon Speelman enquired in the press conference afterwards, whether Kramnik had considered the possibility of the sacrifice 26...Nxe4!? Kramnik replied that he had, but was unsure about this as it might just be losing. However this is an excellent suggestion by the imaginative Speelman, as it would have given Black superb practical chances. One can also see Kasparov playing this way, but perhaps Kramnik found his usual instincts, to play solid, positional chess, difficult to desert? 27.Qxe4 f5 28.Qc4 Rad8 29.Be3! you see it is easy to go wrong here. At first I thought the simple 29.Rd1 was good, but this runs into e4! 30.Nh4 Bb5! 31.Rxb5 axb5 32.Qe2 c6 33.Nf4 Nxf4+ 34.gxf4 Rxd1 35.Qxd1 Bf6 and Black is taking over 29...Bb5 30.Qh4! Rxd5 31.Bxh6 It is important to make every move count Rd6 32.Bxg7+ Kxg7 33.Qh7+ Kf8 with an extremely sharp situation on the board. 27.Nxg5 Nxg5 28.f3 Bxd5 29.Bxd5 c6 30.Bc4 Qc8!? Trying to keep the game as sharp as possible, an understandable decision considering the tournament situation at this point. Afterwards Kramnik bemoaned the fact that he didn't just play 30...Ne6 here, which he considered to be close to a draw. But the problem is he didn't know which result he should be playing for at this point, as it wasn't clear yet that Carlsen was going to lose. 31.Bxe6 31.c3 Nxc5 32.Qxc5 Red8 33.Ra2 Rd7 also looks fairly equal, Black is a pawn up, but this is balanced out by his queenside weaknesses and the superb bishop on c4 31...Rxe6 32.Qd3 h5 33.Rha1 Bf8 does indeed look quite drawish. 31.Qb3 h5 32.Be3 Ne6 33.Rha1 h4 Another move that later brought sharp criticism by Kramnik, but for me this is a very human reaction - Black is becoming slowly squeezed, so it's human nature to want to grab some squares for his pieces. 34.gxh4 Qd8 35.Rxa6 Rc8? But only this move really cost Vladimir a rematch with Vishy. Now Black just has a bad position, without even a pawn to compensate for that. One can only imagine that Kramnik refrained for the seemingly natural continuation 35...Rxa6! 36.Rxa6 Qxh4 37.Rxc6 as perhaps he felt that Black is only fighting for a draw here. But at least he has some squares! Ng5 38.Bxg5 The computer makes the suggestion 38.Bxf7+ Nxf7 and now the calm 39.b5 a very sharp idea indeed, but would Ivanchuk have played this way? I somehow doubt it. Bf6 40.b6 Rd8∞ with the idea of ...Rd1, where there is still everything to play for 38...Qxg5+ 39.Kf1 Ra8 40.Ra6 Rxa6 41.Bxa6 Bh6 which should objectively end in a draw. 36.Rh1 The computer points out that it's possible to even ignore the threat on the h-pawn with 36.c3! Qxh4 37.Bxe6 Rxe6 38.b5! and the b-pawn comes through, with similar gruesome results to the game. 36...Rc7 37.Bxe6 Rxe6 38.b5! A move that effectively ended Kramnik's brave challenge for another two years, and ensured that the Norwegian Wunderkind Magnus Carlsen would challenge Anand for the World title. White's threats are murderous. Rb7 39.b6 c5 40.Rb1 Bf8 40...Bf6 41.Qd5 Rb8 42.Qxd8+ Bxd8 43.Bxc5+- 41.Qd5! By this stage it was clear that Carlsen was going to lose, but this must have been scant consolation for Vladimir, staring at the ruins of his position. Qb8 Kramnik had missed that 41...Rd7 runs into 42.Qa8! Rd2+ 43.Kg3 but his task is helpless in any case. 42.Rba1 Rd6 43.Ra8! Rxd5 44.Rxb8 Rxb8 45.exd5 Bd6 46.Ra6 Rb7 47.Kf1 The king simply runs to the queenside, while Black can't move a thing. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ivanchuk,V2757Kramnik,V28101–02013FIDE Candidates14
Carlsen,M2872Svidler,P27470–12013FIDE Candidates14

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.