Post-mortems and princes

by Jonathan Speelman
9/20/2020 – Star columnist Jon Speelman reminisces on the days chess players indulged in a post-mortem discussion — across a table — after their game was over. Speelman also talks about the very strongest players never to become world champion, particularly two that he faced repeatedly during his career — Viktor Korchnoi (pictured) and Vassily Ivanchuk. | Photo: Mary Delaney Cooke/Corbis

Komodo Chess 14 Komodo Chess 14

Last year Komodo won the world championship title on two occasions and can call itself "2019 World Computer Chess Champion" and "2019 World Chess Software Champion". And the current Komodo 14 has been clearly improved over its predecessor!


Bronstein, Korchnoi, Ivanchuk

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

Long long ago, when all serious chess was still played by two people sitting across a table (without a perspex partition in-between) sometimes with a wooden board and wooden pieces and even with a clock that actually ticked, the players often used to indulge in a post-mortem afterwards.

Personally, I always saw and see the post-mortem as a time for a cordial exchange of ideas to examine the game as objectively as possible, though I’m happy to show off a bit with more or less (im)plausible variations which I’ve seen. But for others it’s a quite different affair.

There are some players who like to maintain dominance during the post-mortem as well (as the game itself) with an eye to possible future games against the same opponent. And some very strong players express views which are obviously totally unrealistic (they always have a good position unless something palpably awful happens) whatever their real internal view of the battle. There’s also plenty of opportunity for more or less genial verbal exchanges and I’ve been told that the great Viktor Korchnoi actually used to prepare his post-mortem insults before the game, depending on the result!

Viktor Korchnoi

Viktor Korchnoi

Korchnoi lived his formative years during the Siege of Leningrad so it’s completely understandable that he wasn’t the easiest of men. I had a minus score against him though with quite a few wins as well, and we had perfectly good relations though they were a little strained when for a very short time during the Montpelier Candidates tournament of 1985 — which I had come to as first reserve — I was employed by him as a second before he sacked me. 

“Viktor the Terrible” was one of the very strongest players never to become world champion and I can only think offhand of a handful of others from the mid-twentieth century onwards who were “(Crown) Princes”  to the same extent: Paul Keres, David Bronstein and Vassily Ivanchuk. I may well be missing somebody, and readers are more than welcome to carp in the comments. When I streamed later in the day after writing this, Akiba Rubinstein was suggested as an earlier one.  

Vassily IvanchukI never played Keres — after all he sadly died in 1975 when I was still a teenager — and had a single game with Bronstein, a draw at the Lloyds Bank Masters in 1989. But I have played a lot of games with Ivanchuk and more or less maintained an “even” score — as many draws as losses — without ever winning. I’ve always considered him, Karpov and Kasparov included, to be the best player I've ever faced and had his nerves been anything like as good as those Ks then he would more than likely have become world champion.

Before a few of my games against the “Princes”, a lovely word which I came across during the week through “A word a day”, the free newsletter from It is verbigerate, which is defined as:

verb intransitive.: To obsessively repeat meaningless words and phrases.

Feel free to find suitable contexts for this and please post them in the comments if you like.


Select an entry from the list to switch between games

My Life for Chess Vol. 1

Victor Kortchnoi, two-times contender for the world championship, is a piece of living chess history. He is known as one of the greatest fighters in the history of chess. On this DVD he speaks about his life and shows his game.


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register

Yasser Seirawan Yasser Seirawan 9/22/2020 02:56
"Wins the house and the garden..." The second part is a lovely addition to the common, "wins the house." I must remember that bit. Cheers Jonathan!
ulyssesganesh ulyssesganesh 9/21/2020 12:18
Alexander Belyavsky was a one more crown prince!
Álvaro Pereira Álvaro Pereira 9/21/2020 02:31
I had the pleasure of maintaining several long conversations with Bronstein, when he came for the 1997 Lisbon's Chess Week, organized by João Pereira, who invited, in other years, players like Kasparov, Karpov, Spassky, Judit Pólgar and Timman.
Bronstein was a highly cultured man and from his arrival he visited several museums and monuments, including Jerónimos Monastery, where is the tomb of Vasco da Gama, the captain of the Portuguese fleet who reached India by see, in 1498. At the Week's opening cerimony, with lots of TV cameras and journalists, Bronstein was sitting at my side. He didn't speak Portuguese, but he understood "Vasco da Gama" on the speech of Rita Magrinho, the City Councillor for Sports. "What did she say about Vasco da Gama?", he asked me. "Something I didn't know: that some of the crew members of Gama's fleet entertained themselves playing chess, on the way to India." He had a naughty smile. "Oh... I told that to João and certainly the lady heard it from him. I just invented that. But it's a nice story, isn't it?" And that "nice story" was reproduced on several newspapers!
Included in the Week, there was a four-players tournament man+machine vs. man+machine, perhaps the first one of that kind staged in the World. Bronstein decided to play without the computer's help. When I faced him, I also leaved the computer alone. It was my chance to play with a former World Vice-Champion! I had White, and the game ended with a draw by repetition. He was in a peaceful mood, and preferred another talk about chess and culture to force matters on the board.
Those enjoyable conversations with David will remain forever on my mind.