Magnus Carlsen keeps the crown

by Antonio Pereira
11/29/2018 – The 2018 World Championship match in London concluded on Wednesday. Two days before his 28th birthday, Sven Magnus Øen Carlsen confirmed his status as World Champion for at least two more years. And he did it in style, getting a 3:0 wipe-out in the rapid tiebreaks over Fabiano Caruana. Both players were deservingly praised for their efforts afterwards, in what was considered one of the most far-reaching chess events in recent history. GM DANIEL FERNANDEZ and GM YANNICK PELLETIER analysed all the games of the tiebreaks. | Photos: World Chess

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Tour de force

A lot can be said about what happened during the classical portion of the match, especially about the fact that it ended without a single decisive result. However, the palpable tension and the increasing rise of expectation established before the tiebreaks gave way to a fascinating final showdown scenario. For the chess world, Wednesday was clearly the most important date in this year's calendar — a champion was to be crowned no matter what. For such high-class competitors as Magnus and Fabiano, it probably would not have made much of a difference if the tiebreaks would have been played on a desert island...

But they were far from isolated. Chess fans all over the world tuned in to follow the action, while mainstream media outlets also showed up in London to report for a much wider general audience — networks as big as NBC, ABC, CBS, USA Today, the New York Times and Eurosport were present. Lucy Hawking, the daughter of one of the most influential scientists of the twentieth century, Stephen Hawking, made the first move — she shared a childhood experience:

I used to play chess with my father, but since I was a little girl I didn’t understand that he was a genius…I was mystified [by] why he always won.

Lucy Hawking almost played 1.c3? for Magnus, but then corrected to 1.c4

For those of us more in touch with the game, Carlsen's decision to so intentionally go for the rapid tiebreaks made a lot of sense. After all, we have seen through the years how dominant he is when it comes to accelerated time controls. And not only that — we have also seen how this is clearly not Fabiano's forte. Before the games, the difference in rapid ratings between the two contenders was no less than 91 points (now the gap has widened to 136, with Magnus having an outstanding 2902 live rating!)

Nevertheless, Fabiano had shown great nerves throughout the match, and Magnus did not appear to be at his best. Everything was still possible.

Four games with 25 minutes per side plus a 10-second increment were to be played, with blitz mini-matches and Armageddon to follow in case of a tie. The first game started at 3 p.m. in London, so it was not hard to imagine for things to wrap up by around 9 or 10 in the evening, particularly if we take into account how close and tense the classical games had been. 

But a different plot was in store...


Tiebreak summary

GM Daniel King presents a brief summary of the games


Game 1

Carlsen had the white pieces and opened with 1.c4, taking the battlefield to his terrain of controlled positional struggles — the Norwegian used a rare line with 4.e4 to reach this goal. Soon enough, it was clear that Fabiano was having problems in handling the position, and by move 27 the players reached a rook endgame in which White was a pawn up:

 
Carlsen vs. Caruana - Rapid game #1
Position after 27...Kxd7

Would Magnus manage to convert this? After all, he could not take advantage of a very favourable position in the first classical game. 

The maxim "all rook endgames are drawn" seemed close to being once again proven true, as Fabiano put up great resistance. However, first he let Magnus' king off the back-rank with 34...Rc3 — "not losing, but a bad idea" (D. Fernandez) — and then completely gave away his drawing chances when he grabbed the e-pawn:

 
Position after 37.Rc7

37.Kxe4? turned out to be the losing blunder, when it was necessary to check White's king with 37...Ra2+ — the idea was to create mating threats on h1 with the kings on f3 and h3. Carlsen showed good technique and took the full point after 55 moves.

This was the first decisive game of the match, and one that was a definite turning point — Magnus' boost of confidence provoked by this victory was key in what was to come.

Magnus showing he is well-versed in rook endgames

Game 2

The pressure was now on Caruana, who opened 1.e4 for the seventh time in London, and Magnus offered to explore a similar Sveshnikov Sicilian as the one seen in game twelve — the champion did not change his strategy after getting the advantage in the match. Fabiano, true to the nature of the position, played 12.h4, a move favoured by the engine but also a manoeuvre that according to Judit Polgar was not easy for Fabiano, as "he couldn't feel the dynamics of the position".

In a rich position, the Challenger showed courage with a pawn break:

 
Caruana vs. Carlsen - Rapid game #2
Position after 20...Qf5

With his king still in the centre, Caruana opened up the position with the sharp 21.c5. Here is when Carlsen showed his class, though. In the following sequence of moves, he did not falter despite the difficulties — and then he took advantage of Caruana's mistakes. The American was already in deep trouble after, once again, pushing his c-pawn:

 
Position after 25...e4

Black's knight is about to get to e5 with decisive effect, so it was imperative to defend against this strategical threat with 26.Bd4. Caruana's 26.c7?, on the other hand, was losing. It was evident that Carlsen had calculated this idea, as he immediately captured with 26...Bxc7. The game continued 27.Nxc7 Ne5, and Caruana erred again with 28.Nd5?:

 
Position after 28.Nd5

Fabiano is counting on a knight fork from e7 — Carlsen, aware of this, did not take long to play the cool and accurate 28...Kh7. Everything is hanging in White's position. At this point, Caruana looked a bit shell-shocked; he took a few glances at the clock and resigned. 

Carlsen was up 2:0 and only a miracle could save the American.

Three long weeks that followed a long preparation phase about to be over

Game 3

The previous game had proven that Carlsen was in 'beast mode', completely in control of his emotions and with his confidence up to its usual (very) high standard — that did not change in the third encounter. He set up a Maroczy Bind structure from a Sicilian and created a harmonious position, with total control over the d5-square:

 
Carlsen vs. Caruana - Rapid game #3
Position after 21.Qf2

Caruana started to look for chances with 21...Ne7, but in the long run, as it tends to happen in these situations, he only managed to give White space and opportunities. 

The position was objectively balanced, but the match situation clearly called for Black to try to muddy the waters. Carlsen did not falter, though. It was all about control, and apparently nothing could perturb the champion's concentration. By move 49, he was already winning, and he even managed to finish off the match with two queens on the board:

 
Position after 49...Qe3

The same c-pawn that caused Fabiano to lose game three promoted into a queen in the next encounter. After 50.c8Q f4 51.Qg4, Caruana resigned and Carlsen kept his title after getting a whopping 3:0 score in the tiebreaks.

Carlsen showed his strength


Tiebreak games analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez

English GM Daniel Fernandez provided expert analyses of Carlsen's three rapid victories:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3 Bb4 4.e4!? This move is extremely rare, and judging by the time situations that followed, it seems this came as a surprise to the Challenger. 0-0 4...Bxc3 is possible, but super-GM opinion coalesced against White's position in the line 5.dxc3 Nxe4 6.Qd5 Ng5 7.Qxe5+ Ne6 Black's position is slightly worse, even if from my modest perspective I consider it to be relatively easy to play! 5.Nge2 c6 This move makes sense in conjunction with ...Ba5-c7, or alternatively... 6.Bg2 a6!? At this point, if not on the move before, Black commits to a plan which might be practically interesting, but doesn't particularly inspire confidence on an objective level. 6...d6 7.0-0 a5 8.d3 Nbd7 is a more 'traditional' English follow-up. 7.0-0 b5 8.d4! This has to be critical. White is a little better, but with the murky strategic situation and the rapid time control anything could happen. d6 9.a3 9.f4?! exd4 10.Nxd4 bxc4 9...Bxc3 9...Ba5 10.b4 Bc7 11.cxb5 axb5 12.d5 may simply be a strategic disadvantage, so it's wise to try and avoid this. 10.Nxc3 bxc4 11.dxe5 It is not yet time for 11.f4 : Bg4! 12.Qd2 Qb6 11...dxe5 12.Na4 12.Qe2 was the engine suggestion, and it seems to me that Black has to play another unusual move in order to avoid being clearly worse. a5 12...Qd3? 13.Qxd3 cxd3 14.Rd1± 12...Be6 13.f4± 13.Na4! Ba6 14.Nc5 Qb6 15.Nxa6 Qxa6 White should be a little better, but nothing is too clear yet. 12...Be6! Black has to play this cold-blooded move in my opinion- recognising that Nc5 isn't quite the dramatic positional masterstroke that it seems. 12...Nbd7 13.Qc2 Nb6 14.Nxb6 Qxb6 15.Qxc4 is miserable. 13.Qxd8 13.Nc5 Qe7 14.Nxe6 Qxe6 15.Be3 Rc8! With ...c5 and ...Nc6-d4 to come; Black seems to be emerging from his difficulties now. 13...Rxd8 14.Be3 Nbd7 15.f3 White opts for a steady approach, seemingly convinced of having some kind of edge. Indeed, in practical games between ordinary mortals this would be the case. Rab8 16.Rac1 Rb3 17.Rfe1 Ne8?! This move is strategically desirable, but only if Black can also get ...f6, ...Nd6 and ... Kf7 without being interrupted. Now, he probably risks being somewhat worse again. 17...Rdb8! is better, intending to give back the pawn in a way that makes White's structure a little weaker. 18.Bf1 c3 19.Rxc3 Rxc3 20.bxc3 Rb3 21.Ra1 a5= 18.Bf1 Nd6 19.Rcd1 Nb5? 19...Nb7! was required, followed by the cold-blooded sequence 20.f4 g6 21.f5 gxf5 22.exf5 Bd5 23.Nc3 Nf6 when despite the strange location of some of Black's pieces, there is no objective problem. I suspect that Fabiano saw this, didn't notice that the Nb7 defended the Rd8 and opted for a move that stopped Nc3. 20.Nc5! This is a key move for White to see, after which he is clearly better. Rxb2 21.Nxe6 fxe6 22.Bxc4 Nd4 23.Bxd4 exd4 24.Bxe6+ The engine suggests the brutal and unfindable 24.Rxd4 Kf7 25.Kh1‼+- when Black has no defence against Red1 and Rd6; White will probably come out 2 pawns ahead. 24...Kf8 25.Rxd4 Ke7 26.Rxd7+ Rxd7 27.Bxd7 Kxd7 28.Rd1+ Ke6 29.f4 c5 Watching this position live in the 'kibitzing' area, I was shocked to discover that barely anyone else thought the position was closer to a draw than a win. 30.Rd5?! 30.Rc1 Kd6 31.a4!? is the engine opinion. Almost all these positions will come down to some version of 3v2 on the kingside with an extra a-pawn each to confuse the players; the point is to identify which versions entail Black having a worse rook! For instance, see the line Rd2?! 32.e5+ Kd5 33.e6 Kxe6 34.Rxc5 g6 35.Re5+ Kf6 36.Ra5 Ke6 37.h3 Rd6 38.Kf2+- when White is close to winning. 30...Rc2 31.h4 c4 32.f5+ Kf6 33.Rc5 h5 34.Kf1 Rc3?! Not losing, but a bad idea. Following 34...c3 35.Ke1 Rg2 36.Rxc3 Ke5= Black would have very comfortably held this ending even two pawns down. 35.Kg2 Rxa3 36.Rxc4 Ke5 37.Rc7 Kxe4? Based on a flawed trick. This is probably the decisive error. 37...Ra2+! could have been played first, and then the trick works as in the next note: 38.Kh3 Kxe4 39.Rxg7 Ra1 and since White has to think about getting mated, he is not able to stay in position to deliver Rg5+. 38.Re7+ 38.Rxg7 Ra2+ 39.Kh3 Ra1!= is the tricky point. 38...Kxf5 39.Rxg7 Kf6 40.Rg5 a5 41.Rxh5+- Now the position is winning for Carlsen. Sometimes, a flank pawn can hold off two central pawns in such cases, but definitely not when the opponent's two pawns are both on the opposite side of the board. a4 42.Ra5 Ra1 43.Kf3 a3 44.Ra6+ Kg7 45.Kg2 Ra2+ 46.Kh3 Ra1 47.h5 Kh7 48.g4 Kg7 49.Kh4 a2 50.Kg5 Kf7 51.h6 Rb1 52.Ra7+ Kg8 53.Rxa2 Rb5+ 54.Kg6 Rb6+ 55.Kh5 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M-Caruana,F-1–02018A22WC Playoffs 20181
Caruana,F-Carlsen,M-0–12018WC Playoffs 20182
Carlsen,M-Caruana,F-1–02018B44WC Playoffs 20183

The aftermath

A clearly satisfied Magnus started the press conference with a relaxed statement: "I felt that I had a really good day at work today. [...] Everything went perfectly". Caruana humbly accepted the result, declaring in a post-game interview: "I think the results show that he is the strongest player in the world…and he is the World Champion, so it's quite fitting".

The final press conference

In the closing ceremony that followed, Carlsen thanked his team and the organisers. He was emphatic when praising his opponent:

Thanks to my opponent for a great fight. He showed himself to be an extremely strong player, versatile and very, very tough to beat. [...] I don't think we've seen the last from Fabiano in this particular context.   

Regarding his decision from the twelfth game, the champion said:

I made a sporting decision that I felt very comfortable with at the time, and I would have believed it to be the right one regardless of the result in the [tiebreaks].

He then clarified:

I've been a chess professional now for many years [...]. One of the things that I've never done very well is listen to other people's advice. I've always gone my way and that's what I did this time. [...] And it's brought me this trophy today.

Carlsen with trophy

A satisfied champion | Photo: Niki Riga

Former World Champion — and former Magnus' trainer — Garry Kasparov congratulated Magnus and Fabiano on Twitter. He noted what Caruana’s ‘mistake’ was:

As per usual, Fabiano showed great sportsmanship and quickly posted:

It was a unique and hard-fought match, with a deserving winner and a worthy challenger. Will we see a rematch in 2020?  

A great Challenger


Replay the first moves of the tiebreaks with commentary

Judit Polgar and Anna Rudolf provided live commentary for the official boradcast


Final press conference

Carlsen: "Everything went perfectly"


Round-up shows

GM Yannick Pelletier reviews the game


All games of the match

 
Loading...
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.

Macauley Peterson contributed reporting from London

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.