11/29/2018 – The 2018 World Championship match in London concluded on Wednesday. Two days before his 28th birthday, Sven Magnus Øen Carlsen confirmed his status as World Champion for at least two more years. And he did it in style, getting a 3:0 wipe-out in the rapid tiebreaks over Fabiano Caruana. Both players were deservingly praised for their efforts afterwards, in what was considered one of the most far-reaching chess events in recent history. GM DANIEL FERNANDEZ and GM YANNICK PELLETIER analysed all the games of the tiebreaks. | Photos: World Chess
new: Fritz 20
Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally. FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before.
Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally. FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before.
EXPAND YOUR CHESS HORIZONS
Your entry into the great world of ChessBase with ChessBase Program '26, Big Database, CBM and Premium Account.
€249.90
Tour de force
A lot can be said about what happened during the classical portion of the match, especially about the fact that it ended without a single decisive result. However, the palpable tension and the increasing rise of expectation established before the tiebreaks gave way to a fascinating final showdown scenario. For the chess world, Wednesday was clearly the most important date in this year's calendar — a champion was to be crowned no matter what. For such high-class competitors as Magnus and Fabiano, it probably would not have made much of a difference if the tiebreaks would have been played on a desert island...
But they were far from isolated. Chess fans all over the world tuned in to follow the action, while mainstream media outlets also showed up in London to report for a much wider general audience — networks as big as NBC, ABC, CBS, USA Today, the New York Times and Eurosport were present. Lucy Hawking, the daughter of one of the most influential scientists of the twentieth century, Stephen Hawking, made the first move — she shared a childhood experience:
I used to play chess with my father, but since I was a little girl I didn’t understand that he was a genius…I was mystified [by] why he always won.
Lucy Hawking almost played 1.c3? for Magnus, but then corrected to 1.c4
For those of us more in touch with the game, Carlsen's decision to so intentionally go for the rapid tiebreaks made a lot of sense. After all, we have seen through the years how dominant he is when it comes to accelerated time controls. And not only that — we have also seen how this is clearly not Fabiano's forte. Before the games, the difference in rapid ratings between the two contenders was no less than 91 points (now the gap has widened to 136, with Magnus having an outstanding 2902 live rating!)
Nevertheless, Fabiano had shown great nerves throughout the match, and Magnus did not appear to be at his best. Everything was still possible.
Four games with 25 minutes per side plus a 10-second increment were to be played, with blitz mini-matches and Armageddon to follow in case of a tie. The first game started at 3 p.m. in London, so it was not hard to imagine for things to wrap up by around 9 or 10 in the evening, particularly if we take into account how close and tense the classical games had been.
But a different plot was in store...
Tiebreak summary
GM Daniel King presents a brief summary of the games
Game 1
Carlsen had the white pieces and opened with 1.c4, taking the battlefield to his terrain of controlled positional struggles — the Norwegian used a rare line with 4.e4 to reach this goal. Soon enough, it was clear that Fabiano was having problems in handling the position, and by move 27 the players reached a rook endgame in which White was a pawn up:
Essentially, the English Opening usually leads to reversed positions in which the first player enjoys the extra tempo. Then why not meet this 1.c4 move with 1…e5 and play the reversed Sicilian? In this 60 Minutes video, you will find a complete repertoire for Black based on the move 1…e5 against White’s most popular approach - the Reversed Dragon setup. Bulgarian GM Dejan Bojkov uses very recent top GM games to highlight the trends in the line and to explain the ideas behind Black’s development.
Would Magnus manage to convert this? After all, he could not take advantage of a very favourable position in the first classical game.
The maxim "all rook endgames are drawn" seemed close to being once again proven true, as Fabiano put up great resistance. However, first he let Magnus' king off the back-rank with 34...Rc3 — "not losing, but a bad idea" (D. Fernandez) — and then completely gave away his drawing chances when he grabbed the e-pawn:
37.Kxe4? turned out to be the losing blunder, when it was necessary to check White's king with 37...Ra2+ — the idea was to create mating threats on h1 with the kings on f3 and h3. Carlsen showed good technique and took the full point after 55 moves.
This was the first decisive game of the match, and one that was a definite turning point — Magnus' boost of confidence provoked by this victory was key in what was to come.
Magnus showing he is well-versed in rook endgames
Game 2
The pressure was now on Caruana, who opened 1.e4 for the seventh time in London, and Magnus offered to explore a similar Sveshnikov Sicilian as the one seen in game twelve — the champion did not change his strategy after getting the advantage in the match. Fabiano, true to the nature of the position, played 12.h4, a move favoured by the engine but also a manoeuvre that according to Judit Polgar was not easy for Fabiano, as "he couldn't feel the dynamics of the position".
In a rich position, the Challenger showed courage with a pawn break:
With his king still in the centre, Caruana opened up the position with the sharp 21.c5. Here is when Carlsen showed his class, though. In the following sequence of moves, he did not falter despite the difficulties — and then he took advantage of Caruana's mistakes. The American was already in deep trouble after, once again, pushing his c-pawn:
Play like Carlsen, avoid theory but without being passive or losing the initiative.
Black's knight is about to get to e5 with decisive effect, so it was imperative to defend against this strategical threat with 26.Bd4. Caruana's 26.c7?, on the other hand, was losing. It was evident that Carlsen had calculated this idea, as he immediately captured with 26...Bxc7. The game continued 27.Nxc7 Ne5, and Caruana erred again with 28.Nd5?:
Fabiano is counting on a knight fork from e7 — Carlsen, aware of this, did not take long to play the cool and accurate 28...Kh7. Everything is hanging in White's position. At this point, Caruana looked a bit shell-shocked; he took a few glances at the clock and resigned.
Carlsen was up 2:0 and only a miracle could save the American.
Three long weeks that followed a long preparation phase about to be over
Game 3
The previous game had proven that Carlsen was in 'beast mode', completely in control of his emotions and with his confidence up to its usual (very) high standard — that did not change in the third encounter. He set up a Maroczy Bind structure from a Sicilian and created a harmonious position, with total control over the d5-square:
The Maroczy System of the Sicilian Defence is one of the modern openings where Black attacks the white centre mainly with pieces. After the moves 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 g6 5.c4 Nf6 the pawns c4 and e4 secure White a space advantage in the middle, however, it is exactly these central pillars which may easily become targets of the black counterattack. Sergei Tiviakov has been applying this system with Black in his tournament practice since 1991 and is considered one its greatest experts.
Caruana started to look for chances with 21...Ne7, but in the long run, as it tends to happen in these situations, he only managed to give White space and opportunities.
The position was objectively balanced, but the match situation clearly called for Black to try to muddy the waters. Carlsen did not falter, though. It was all about control, and apparently nothing could perturb the champion's concentration. By move 49, he was already winning, and he even managed to finish off the match with two queens on the board:
The same c-pawn that caused Fabiano to lose game three promoted into a queen in the next encounter. After 50.c8Q f4 51.Qg4, Caruana resigned and Carlsen kept his title after getting a whopping 3:0 score in the tiebreaks.
Carlsen showed his strength
Tiebreak games analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez
English GM Daniel Fernandez provided expert analyses of Carlsen's three rapid victories:
The aftermath
A clearly satisfied Magnus started the press conference with a relaxed statement: "I felt that I had a really good day at work today. [...] Everything went perfectly". Caruana humbly accepted the result, declaring in a post-game interview: "I think the results show that he is the strongest player in the world…and he is the World Champion, so it's quite fitting".
The final press conference
In the closing ceremony that followed, Carlsen thanked his team and the organisers. He was emphatic when praising his opponent:
Thanks to my opponent for a great fight. He showed himself to be an extremely strong player, versatile and very, very tough to beat. [...] I don't think we've seen the last from Fabiano in this particular context.
Regarding his decision from the twelfth game, the champion said:
I made a sporting decision that I felt very comfortable with at the time, and I would have believed it to be the right one regardless of the result in the [tiebreaks].
He then clarified:
I've been a chess professional now for many years [...]. One of the things that I've never done very well is listen to other people's advice. I've always gone my way and that's what I did this time. [...] And it's brought me this trophy today.
Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.
A satisfied champion | Photo: Niki Riga
Former World Champion — and former Magnus' trainer — Garry Kasparov congratulated Magnus and Fabiano on Twitter. He noted what Caruana’s ‘mistake’ was:
Congratulations to @MagnusCarlsen, World Champion once more! Valiant fight from Caruana pushed Magnus to show his best, and, unfortunately for Caruana, today he did!
At first glance, the Hedgehog setup might appear somewhat passive but in fact Black is always waiting to launch a counterattack. Let Yannick Pelletier provide you with a complete repertoire against the English and the Reti!
GM Yannick Pelletier reviews the game
All games of the match
Macauley Peterson contributed reporting from London
Antonio PereiraAntonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.
My dream would be the whole game be play in no more than four hours. Players know already the first 20+ moves thanks to computer. Why play 7 hours of chess?.
manu1945 11/30/2018 03:23
Caruana has never been better. His problem is that he is a not elite when playing rapid and blitz.
Two years from now who knows who the challenger will be.
jsaldea12 11/30/2018 01:59
I believe Caruana suffered physical fatigue and mental also after that long wearisome rounds for several days. It probably was showing starting rounds 12 when he lagged in time. then rounds 13, 14, 15, his fatigue was evident.. Look at the quality of his play. Carlsen did not have symtom of this! any of this fatigue, was instead invigorated by the comments of Kasparov and Kramnik, Carlsen was just fortunate: He caught Caruana in his worse off-form. "Maybe next time, after two years, they will meet again." (Caruana)
Claudioarrau 11/30/2018 01:45
In boxing, if a match finishes without a knockout, a panel of judges decides the winner on points.
Why not do the same in chess matches, with a panel of engines as the judges? At the very least, it would deter players from making a mockery of classical chess by playing for rapid and blitz tie-breaks?
And psychologically, it would encourage players to take more risks to win, rather than suffer comparison with the engines' analysis.
Nimdog64 11/30/2018 12:42
I don't agree with all the Magnus detractors. His goal was to retain his title. He succeeded. He broke no rules. He gave himself the best chance to win this match under the format he was required to play by. Some say he has no fighting spirit. Guess what? 3-0 ! That's fighting spirit!
ChessSpawn49 11/30/2018 12:16
An absolutely disgusting way for the classical WCC to end two cycles in a row. Even more so this time after Carlsen offered his now infamous draw in game 12 from a clearly better position.
FIDE needs to completely rethink the WCC format. I suggest going back to a 24 game match. If its tied at 24, the champion keeps his title. If you must have a tiebreak, make it in sets of four games timed at G-90 with NO increment or delay. Play two games per day, no rest days until the match is decided by one payer winning a four game set,. Play the sets one after the other with no rest days between sets of four games.
I and some of my friends have frankly lost interest in this format. We don't plan to follow it next cycle unless there are substantial changes, particularly with tiebreaks. G-25 and Blitz? No thank you.
nbeqo 11/29/2018 11:22
Classical chess has been dead since the rating of Chess Engines went above 3000 ELO.
Congratulations to Magnus Carlsen for offering draw in game 12 so the chess world could finally watch some real chess, the type of chess that does not involve only the science aspect of it (home preparation with chess engines) but also the type of chess that involves Art (over the board creativity) and Sport such as mistakes, time control, excitement!
kburtram 11/29/2018 11:17
@Petrarlsen Kasparov fighting for his life on the brink of elimination in 1984 was exactly what I had in mind. Holding those draws for so long to come back to the verge of victory is one of most amazing performances in chess history.
Agreed though that including rapid rounds in the championship is a terrible format and the real problem that encourages Magnus's unsportsmanlike behavior.
Petrarlsen 11/29/2018 10:58
@ kburtram:
"I miss Kasparov's fighting spirit."... with his 17 and 14 consecutive draws in the 1984 World Championship match against Karpov, for example???
The playoff showed that a draw in the 12th game more or less meant one more World Title for Carlsen; objectively the results of the playoff demonstrated that he was right in his choice of drewing this game.
In short: "blame the format and not the players" (...which is also completely true about Kasparov in the 1984 match; with an adequate format as this was the case in his next four World Championship matches against Karpov, he never again drew long series of games as in the 1984 match; in this case also, the real culprit was the format and not the players...).
zedsdeadbaby 11/29/2018 10:47
ahhhh... the fighting spirt. The good old days when everything was always better than today.
3-0 down fighting away:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1067119
I mean this as no disrespect to Kasparov. I consider him one of the elites that took the game to new heights. Even non chess people know him. Point is that what Magnus did what has been done before.
cyronix 11/29/2018 10:46
you shouldnt forget the match anand - topalov, topalov lost in the last round with white because he overpressed, but he only overpressed, because he knew he wouldnt stand a chance against Anand in the rapids, so this would be another match that wasnt really decided in classical chess.
kburtram 11/29/2018 10:25
Magnus's cowardly performance in Game 12 was a disgrace to the World Championship title. I miss Kasparov's fighting spirit. Magnus can claim to be better than Fabiano at rapid and that's about all.
Petrarlsen 11/29/2018 10:24
@ ChessBase:
Many thanks for all the annotated games during the World Championship; there was plenty of very interesting annotators - top-notch coverage!
Ajeeb007 11/29/2018 10:20
These last two world championship matches have been disappointing. They need to go back to 24 game matches and drop the silly speed chess. It's unfortunate that Fabiano Caruana didn't win the title as he presents a well mannered and professional image on behalf of the game.
Petrarlsen 11/29/2018 10:16
@ Nimdog64:
"However, I don't like the tiebreak system. The world classical chess title is decided by rapid play? This doesn't make sense."
No indeed, this doesn't make sense at all!
If you would want to confuse a little more still your non-chess playing friends, you could try to explain them that, on the one hand, the 2016 and 2018 Classical World Championships were decided in Rapid games (...so it would seem at first view that Carlsen is in fact more the King of Rapid chess than of Classical chess, isn't it?...)......... but that the World Rapid Chess Championship 2017 was won by Anand, so that, in fact, Carlsen is a "King of classical chess" thanks to Rapid games, but he is not the King of Rapid chess, as the King or Rapid chess is Anand!
After this, you can be reasonably sure that your friends will never ever want to know anything more about competitive chess!!!
zedsdeadbaby 11/29/2018 09:49
@ Geemo - 'Yes it was perfectly within the rules. No, it doesn't befit a real champion. '
I commented somewhere else that Magnus seems to be a cold winner. Nothing matters but the win. In your eyes 'a real champion' has to offer more than bringing home the win. Which is fair enough. But as far as getting results go Carlsen has shown that he'll do whatever it takes with in the rules. Change the format and Carlsen will change to win that format - because he just wants the win.
zedsdeadbaby 11/29/2018 09:42
maxharmonist - good comment. Time makes people forget details.
Nimdog64 11/29/2018 09:28
Congratulations to Magnus Carlsen on retaining his title. He's a true champion. Also congrats to Fabiano for giving it his all. However, I don't like the tiebreak system. The world classical chess title is decided by rapid play? This doesn't make sense. We need to go back to a 24 game match. Players will take more chances. 12 games is just too short. Before the match I was trying to get my non chess playing friends interested in the match. After about the 6th draw they were all bored with chess. Does anyone ever win they asked me. I said they do just watch. After the 12th draw I didn't know what to say.
GeeMo 11/29/2018 09:02
@Balthus You're correct in asmuch as Kramnik / Leko will not go down as one of the great world championships. That was a pretty dark period for chess IMO. I was hoping Carlsen would be a savior of sorts, but his play of late suggests more fear of losing than burning passion to win. I'm not faulting anyone for drawing, but I expect someone in the "greatest of all time" conversation to be willing to take a risk or two once in a while, to demonstrate that he's the best without question. I didn't see even a hint of that. Carlsen's play was merely adequate to the task; he enjoyed the advantage of equality benefiting the current champion. Even in a position with a lot of play left, he chose the easy way out. Yes it was perfectly within the rules. No, it doesn't befit a real champion.
zedsdeadbaby 11/29/2018 08:57
@michaelriber:
Carlsen divides opinion. He speaks honestly and behaves true to his own personality. He sometimes puts this above other social/professional obligations. The problem with Fabi is that he is very, very, nice. He says all the right things and does all the right things. He is very considerate of sponsors, audience, press and other players. Now this might tick all your boxes for a nice person that you'd like to see as WCC, others would see him a man dull as dish water. Being likeable alone does not draw attention to chess I am afraid. Now Tal, likeable, lust for life, mind bogging chess, pretty much everyone liked him as WCC, but he was much much more than likeable.
Derek880 11/29/2018 08:55
If you are a player with any kind of chess strength, you would be able to see that the match was far from boring. These weren't 15 move draws. Many were tense draws. Even Carlsen's poor draw offering in game 12 was from a really tense game. However, I'm not a fan of Carlsen's entitled behavior. We have a current U.S. president who displays the same type of man-baby actions and responses as Carlsen has shown in some of his interviews. It's a bit ridiculous and it's not funny or cute. While I can appreciate Carlsen's chess, I have very little appreciation for his personality or demeanor. It's the same reason that I've never been a big Fischer fan. Give me a Caruana or a Wesley So any day of the week. Charisma sells chess. Not entitlement.
twamers 11/29/2018 07:20
Congratulations to Magnus on retaining his title and congratulations to Caruana for a fantastic year. The match was settled as per the rules (e.g. Tiebreak by Rapid/Blitz in event of a drawn match). Personally however I do not like the 12 game format for the Classical Chess World Championship. It seems the players are too scared to lose because there are so few games. In my estimation a longer match of 20/24 games is needed. If we take the Karjakin and Caruana matches (total 24 games) we have only 2 wins. One only needs to look back at say Kasparov/Karpov 24 games matches for something better. This of course is not a fault of the players who both played to fully respect the match rules. For me this is an issue for FIDE and I hope the new President will give this thought. For me the 12 game match was also fairly sterile. But Carlsen is the best player and whilst I think by his own high standards he may feel he's not played as well as he has done in the past he's still the best player. I've seen comments on here about who is the greatest player etc (and is it Carlsen) etc. For me as Marnus is still young and has probably a reasonable amount of time left in the game I do not put him as the best simply because much of his career is to come. But he is the best current player and others are going to have to improve quite a lot to beat him.
badibadibadi 11/29/2018 07:15
@profylax : Yes, maybe, but because of the ghost of the kasparov-karpov 1984 unlimited match, it is unlikely to happen.
@Green22 : Of course that was an overstatment, but definately theses blitz Classical Chess matches with classical time control involve much more luck than previously. The first to win one game is already a very huge favorite, which is one of the reason why they were so unwilling to take risks. Also, Carlsen's decision to draw the last game he was winning was completely legit from a sporting point of view but only because of this match format. I think the people who are happy with the match format would be as happy if classical chess was dropped altogether and all tournaments would just be rapid/blitz chess. Those who like classical chess can't be satisfied with the way things are going now.
@mc1483 : Much easier to draw with black than to win with white despite the time deficit at this level.
mc1483 11/29/2018 06:39
If draws are such a big issue, there is a radical, simple solution: armageddon for all games. Let's say, 3 hours for White, whole game, 2 hours for Black, whole game (with or without increment, nothing changes) . If game is drawn Black wins; problem solved. At least it should be worth a try in some big tournament, just to see what happens. Much better than to forbid agreed draws or give 3 points for a victory. And something like that has already been done in Go, and it worked.
Raymond Labelle 11/29/2018 05:56
Who is the best chessplayer in the world? If two players are as good one with the other in classical chess, then the best of the two, globally, is the one who is the best in rapid chess - which still has something of classical chess.
Well, that's one way of seeing things which is debatable, but still reasonable.
Raymond Labelle 11/29/2018 05:42
Mr. Royce Campbell, below, reminded this sentence of Carlsen at the presse conference: " ... in classical chess, [Fabiano] has, at this point, just as much ... right as I do to call himself the best in the world."
Important reminder. Magnus has the grace of declaring Fabi the real and moral co-champion of classical chess. Kudos.
marek1969 11/29/2018 05:36
Great battle.
Wembley 11/29/2018 05:32
Congratulations Magnus. So who is now regarded as the best player of all time?
Green22 11/29/2018 05:17
Chess will never become like Poker in Poker theres so much damn luck and horrible players who get rich playing like morons - in Chess that can never happen thank God. Both games are really based on making good decisions. You need talent for Chess as for poker anyone can play and get rich and not know anything about the game to be honest. Ya see it on TV all the time.
Raymond Labelle 11/29/2018 05:06
For reasons that I already explained, I think that if the result is equal after classical games, both Champion and Challenger should be declared co-champions.
Nevertheless, I also think that the current rules providing for a tiebreak are an improvement as compared to the previous rule providing that in case of equality in classical games, the Champion keeps the title. That old rule was a blatant injustice – even if it means an absence of tiebreak and all games are classical. If the result is equal, well, you did not really win. Sorry. Let’s not forget that the current rules were created to remedy that blatant injustice.
At least, under the current rules, if the result is equal in classical games, you still have to play tiebreaks before having the title. And a mini-match of four rapid games is not totally unreasonable. Rapid still has something of the classical game – even though it is different of course (which explains my preferred position of co-championship in case of equality).
profylax 11/29/2018 05:02
First congratulations to Magnus. I think a better World Cup system would have been to play 16 games, then draw on color and the first win thereafter will be world champion
badibadibadi 11/29/2018 04:24
No wonder Unibet was a sponsor, Chess is becoming like Poker nowadays.
ulyssesganesh 11/29/2018 04:18
congrats to magnus ..... and to caruana too ...... it is a pity that the match was not decided on classical games .....i think during the rapids ....caruana was overawed by the occasion .....his choice of openings backfired .....he should have just looked at a few fisher games for inspiration and fighting spirit.....
badibadibadi 11/29/2018 04:16
@Wallac : The failure is on the regulations which are not fit for a Classical Chess World Championship.
Blitz Tie Break ? Are you kidding me ?
Hope that happens someday so we can all see how mad it is.
Caruana and Carlsen are two gentlemen nothing about them, they just played with what they were given. It's bad for both of them, because Carlsen didn't show any superiority in his two last Classical Chess Matches, because of the 12 games format. And Caruana didn't win the title in a rapid tie break after a completely even Classical encounter.
Both players deserve praise, but the format is trash, this match will just be reminded as "all draws, then some rapid". Quicker time controls leads to more decisive results but also badly lowers the quality of the play obviously. Maybe, even in classical tournaments, there should be a mix of both Classical, rapid and blitz, just like in the grand chess tour, add classical chess also, maybe that's what it'll come to at the end.
ssakom 11/29/2018 04:10
After Kramnik's and Kasparov's comments on Carlsen's method (on my mind shared by many chess fans) and Carlsen's acid answer, sure the chess world is divided now between romantics and realistics...Anyway even if I don't like at all Carlsen's behaviour, I have to admit he did well what he wanted to do, a kind of perfection!
badibadibadi 11/29/2018 04:09
@Wallac : The failure is on the regulations which are not fit for a Classical Chess World Championship.
Blitz Tie Break ? Are you kidding me ?
Hope that happens someday so we can all see how mad it is.
royce campbell 11/29/2018 03:47
Carlsen at the presser: " ... in classical chess, [Fabiano] has, at this point, just as much ... right as I do to call himself the best in the world." I thought this was the most telling comment of the day, and alleviates a bit of the maturity questions.
Wallac 11/29/2018 03:33
My comments from a previous post yesterday (different thread)
still stand. bottom line.
Carlsen did not fail at all. The rules are fully understood by both players going into this match.
Carlsen is already (and has maintained) the world champion.
If any one failed here it is Caruana, it is up to him To Beat Carlsen, the onus is on Caruana to Become world champion by beating the world champion. He failed to do so. Carlsen playing the way he did was pure sport. He thrawted his opponent using every means available. Bravo Carlsen. Both these players played on the same field.
thirteen 11/29/2018 03:31
Congratulations to the new World Champion, but truly, we MUST have a future, CLASSICAL format decider, somehow.
maxharmonist 11/29/2018 03:20
”Fischer and Kasparov both played with more of a champion's spirit than Carlsen's timid play”
How was it now? Fischer refused to even defend the title once unless the challenger had to win with a margin of two games, and Kasparov lost the title in a match where he took draws in 11 and 14 moves as white?
Opening videos: Sipke Ernst brings the Ulvestad Variation up to date + Part II of ‘Mikhalchishin's Miniatures’. Special: Jan Werle shows highlights from the FIDE Grand Swiss 2025 in the video. ‘Lucky bag’ with 40 analyses by Ganguly, Illingworth et al.
In this video course, Grandmaster Ivan Sokolov explores the fascinating world of King’s Indian and Pirc structures with colours reversed, often arising from the French or Sicilian.
EXPAND YOUR CHESS HORIZONS
It doesn't get any better than this: the premium equipment perfect for tournament players and professionals: with ChessBase program '26, Mega Database, CORR-Database and much more.
Even more power forFritz. Even more Chess knowledge for you.
€89.90
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.