Magnus Carlsen keeps the crown

by Antonio Pereira
11/29/2018 – The 2018 World Championship match in London concluded on Wednesday. Two days before his 28th birthday, Sven Magnus Øen Carlsen confirmed his status as World Champion for at least two more years. And he did it in style, getting a 3:0 wipe-out in the rapid tiebreaks over Fabiano Caruana. Both players were deservingly praised for their efforts afterwards, in what was considered one of the most far-reaching chess events in recent history. GM DANIEL FERNANDEZ and GM YANNICK PELLETIER analysed all the games of the tiebreaks. | Photos: World Chess

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Tour de force

A lot can be said about what happened during the classical portion of the match, especially about the fact that it ended without a single decisive result. However, the palpable tension and the increasing rise of expectation established before the tiebreaks gave way to a fascinating final showdown scenario. For the chess world, Wednesday was clearly the most important date in this year's calendar — a champion was to be crowned no matter what. For such high-class competitors as Magnus and Fabiano, it probably would not have made much of a difference if the tiebreaks would have been played on a desert island...

But they were far from isolated. Chess fans all over the world tuned in to follow the action, while mainstream media outlets also showed up in London to report for a much wider general audience — networks as big as NBC, ABC, CBS, USA Today, the New York Times and Eurosport were present. Lucy Hawking, the daughter of one of the most influential scientists of the twentieth century, Stephen Hawking, made the first move — she shared a childhood experience:

I used to play chess with my father, but since I was a little girl I didn’t understand that he was a genius…I was mystified [by] why he always won.

Lucy Hawking almost played 1.c3? for Magnus, but then corrected to 1.c4

For those of us more in touch with the game, Carlsen's decision to so intentionally go for the rapid tiebreaks made a lot of sense. After all, we have seen through the years how dominant he is when it comes to accelerated time controls. And not only that — we have also seen how this is clearly not Fabiano's forte. Before the games, the difference in rapid ratings between the two contenders was no less than 91 points (now the gap has widened to 136, with Magnus having an outstanding 2902 live rating!)

Nevertheless, Fabiano had shown great nerves throughout the match, and Magnus did not appear to be at his best. Everything was still possible.

Four games with 25 minutes per side plus a 10-second increment were to be played, with blitz mini-matches and Armageddon to follow in case of a tie. The first game started at 3 p.m. in London, so it was not hard to imagine for things to wrap up by around 9 or 10 in the evening, particularly if we take into account how close and tense the classical games had been. 

But a different plot was in store...


Tiebreak summary

GM Daniel King presents a brief summary of the games


Game 1

Carlsen had the white pieces and opened with 1.c4, taking the battlefield to his terrain of controlled positional struggles — the Norwegian used a rare line with 4.e4 to reach this goal. Soon enough, it was clear that Fabiano was having problems in handling the position, and by move 27 the players reached a rook endgame in which White was a pawn up:

 

Would Magnus manage to convert this? After all, he could not take advantage of a very favourable position in the first classical game. 

The maxim "all rook endgames are drawn" seemed close to being once again proven true, as Fabiano put up great resistance. However, first he let Magnus' king off the back-rank with 34...Rc3 — "not losing, but a bad idea" (D. Fernandez) — and then completely gave away his drawing chances when he grabbed the e-pawn:

 

37.Kxe4? turned out to be the losing blunder, when it was necessary to check White's king with 37...Ra2+ — the idea was to create mating threats on h1 with the kings on f3 and h3. Carlsen showed good technique and took the full point after 55 moves.

This was the first decisive game of the match, and one that was a definite turning point — Magnus' boost of confidence provoked by this victory was key in what was to come.

Magnus showing he is well-versed in rook endgames

Game 2

The pressure was now on Caruana, who opened 1.e4 for the seventh time in London, and Magnus offered to explore a similar Sveshnikov Sicilian as the one seen in game twelve — the champion did not change his strategy after getting the advantage in the match. Fabiano, true to the nature of the position, played 12.h4, a move favoured by the engine but also a manoeuvre that according to Judit Polgar was not easy for Fabiano, as "he couldn't feel the dynamics of the position".

In a rich position, the Challenger showed courage with a pawn break:

 

With his king still in the centre, Caruana opened up the position with the sharp 21.c5. Here is when Carlsen showed his class, though. In the following sequence of moves, he did not falter despite the difficulties — and then he took advantage of Caruana's mistakes. The American was already in deep trouble after, once again, pushing his c-pawn:

 

Black's knight is about to get to e5 with decisive effect, so it was imperative to defend against this strategical threat with 26.Bd4. Caruana's 26.c7?, on the other hand, was losing. It was evident that Carlsen had calculated this idea, as he immediately captured with 26...Bxc7. The game continued 27.Nxc7 Ne5, and Caruana erred again with 28.Nd5?:

 

Fabiano is counting on a knight fork from e7 — Carlsen, aware of this, did not take long to play the cool and accurate 28...Kh7. Everything is hanging in White's position. At this point, Caruana looked a bit shell-shocked; he took a few glances at the clock and resigned. 

Carlsen was up 2:0 and only a miracle could save the American.

Three long weeks that followed a long preparation phase about to be over

Game 3

The previous game had proven that Carlsen was in 'beast mode', completely in control of his emotions and with his confidence up to its usual (very) high standard — that did not change in the third encounter. He set up a Maroczy Bind structure from a Sicilian and created a harmonious position, with total control over the d5-square:

 

Caruana started to look for chances with 21...Ne7, but in the long run, as it tends to happen in these situations, he only managed to give White space and opportunities. 

The position was objectively balanced, but the match situation clearly called for Black to try to muddy the waters. Carlsen did not falter, though. It was all about control, and apparently nothing could perturb the champion's concentration. By move 49, he was already winning, and he even managed to finish off the match with two queens on the board:

 

The same c-pawn that caused Fabiano to lose game three promoted into a queen in the next encounter. After 50.c8Q f4 51.Qg4, Caruana resigned and Carlsen kept his title after getting a whopping 3:0 score in the tiebreaks.

Carlsen showed his strength


Tiebreak games analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez

English GM Daniel Fernandez provided expert analyses of Carlsen's three rapid victories:

 

The aftermath

A clearly satisfied Magnus started the press conference with a relaxed statement: "I felt that I had a really good day at work today. [...] Everything went perfectly". Caruana humbly accepted the result, declaring in a post-game interview: "I think the results show that he is the strongest player in the world…and he is the World Champion, so it's quite fitting".

The final press conference

In the closing ceremony that followed, Carlsen thanked his team and the organisers. He was emphatic when praising his opponent:

Thanks to my opponent for a great fight. He showed himself to be an extremely strong player, versatile and very, very tough to beat. [...] I don't think we've seen the last from Fabiano in this particular context.   

Regarding his decision from the twelfth game, the champion said:

I made a sporting decision that I felt very comfortable with at the time, and I would have believed it to be the right one regardless of the result in the [tiebreaks].

He then clarified:

I've been a chess professional now for many years [...]. One of the things that I've never done very well is listen to other people's advice. I've always gone my way and that's what I did this time. [...] And it's brought me this trophy today.

Carlsen with trophy

A satisfied champion | Photo: Niki Riga

Former World Champion — and former Magnus' trainer — Garry Kasparov congratulated Magnus and Fabiano on Twitter. He noted what Caruana’s ‘mistake’ was:

As per usual, Fabiano showed great sportsmanship and quickly posted:

It was a unique and hard-fought match, with a deserving winner and a worthy challenger. Will we see a rematch in 2020?  

A great Challenger


Replay the first moves of the tiebreaks with commentary

Judit Polgar and Anna Rudolf provided live commentary for the official boradcast


Final press conference

Carlsen: "Everything went perfectly"


Round-up shows

GM Yannick Pelletier reviews the game


All games of the match

 

Macauley Peterson contributed reporting from London

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Balthus Balthus 11/29/2018 03:16
@GeeMo how about Kramnik vs Leko? Did Kramnik show that level of dominance which you expect? You may have seen much but your memories are rather uneven of what you have seen.
badibadibadi badibadibadi 11/29/2018 03:06
@TWCAOnline : Will you still be if he loses the title ? #FanBoy #FakeLove

I remember there was a time when Carlsen cared more about being the undisputed #1 in the world than holding the title (when he was close to a stratospheric 2900).

Now he is the world champion, but definately not over the field as he used to be.

Still, it's fair he is still the World Champion because of his overall results over many many years, but it's not about him, it's about the format 12games, then 4 games rapid tie break which is not fit for a world championship; after Carlsen is gone, there will be many many world champions who simply will not be the best players in the world.
TWCAOnline TWCAOnline 11/29/2018 02:45
Congratulations Magnus Carlsen. Super proud of you. I am a fan and will always be. To the haters:- There were a lot of excitement in the games, you just could not see it. Carlsen reigned supreme. Great pushing back by Caruana.
badibadibadi badibadibadi 11/29/2018 02:37
The problem with this format is as long as Carlsen wins it's okay - not because of his performance during the match - but because of his overall tournament results over a decade.

But if he were to lose in the rapid or even worse blitz tiebreak, the new champion would hardly be considered the best player in the world. There will soon be the same situation again where one player is officially the FIDE world champion without being acknowledged as the world #1.
GeeMo GeeMo 11/29/2018 02:36
I'm old enough to have seen a number of World Championships and World Champions, starting, like many people, with Spassky v Fischer. This was hands down the least satisfying match of them all, and the least likely to have produced a satisfactory result. That Magnus is the Rapid World Champion is the best I can conclude from it. He certainly didn't show any of the superiority (much less dominance) in standard chess I expect from a World Champion. The question about who is the greatest chess player has definitely been answered for me: it isn't Carlsen. Fischer and Kasparov both played with more of a champion's spirit than Carlsen's timid play-not-to-lose approach. Boo. Let's hope there's a new prodigy being raised somewhere.
UBC UBC 11/29/2018 02:33
"he's just not a likeable person. Which is not something you can learn."

That depends on how one considers Magnus Carlsen, i.e., of which identity.
If Magnus Carlsen is seen here primarily as a chess player, then the so-called likability should not be the main criterion for the judgement of him. At least, not the only one and not the major one. Accordingly so is the interpretation of how one, a chess player as well, could learn from him.

Moreover, in fact even on a purely individual level, that is Magnus Carlsen the person, for an evaluation to be executed and a judgement extracted therein to make real sense, a full angle of perspectives must be taken into account as the very first step.

Here, particularly, Carlsen might not be likeable like many of his colleague players, but he is a far more interesting person psychologically speaking.
Balthus Balthus 11/29/2018 02:26
@badibadibadi: who told Caruana not to win or at least draw the first rapid game?

@michaelriber: whenever I hear this or that player "is not likeable", my built-in translator automat whispers to me "I don't like them". Which is okay, you can't like everyone, nor should you, but come on... I'm sure you can do better than that!

@morphic6 +1 I'm sorry to have added more words when you have already voiced the conclusive verdict.

@Adilson: so be it. I, too, think Carlsen has retained his title deservedly. (And Caruana agrees, too, which I think should put this entire debate to bed.)
badibadibadi badibadibadi 11/29/2018 01:55
The 12 games format for a classical world chess championship is absolute trash.

4 games rapid tiebreak is complete garbage too, after Caruana lost the first game, it was already life or death for him, that's why he had to do all in in the second game and lost it badly...

Garbage mainstream chess to gather a wider audience.
KevinC KevinC 11/29/2018 01:42
Being from the U.S., I wanted Caruana to win, but being objective, I honestly thought he would lose by two points in the classical portion. So, that said, I think he did really well, and he showed himself to be a true gentleman in the face of a tough defeat.
Adilson Adilson 11/29/2018 01:12
Carlsen will remain as World Champion for many years to come, he is young, professional and has proved to be the best chess player nowadays.
cjan25 cjan25 11/29/2018 01:09
Old WC matches seemed more interesting than the present tiebreak setup by FIDE. Nothing against Magnus, but I'd be more impressed on a World Champion who can outwit any challenger in classical matches, rather be crowned based on speed chess.
fixpont fixpont 11/29/2018 12:57
@michaelriber that is only true for game 12, before that, MC wanted to win the games you cant say the entire match was boring because of him
morphic6 morphic6 11/29/2018 11:59
I like Carlsen, and he won according to the rules. Both players fought well and people should keep their negative comments to themselves. Show some respect for yourself and these great players, and the game we know as chess.
Keshava Keshava 11/29/2018 11:41
@michaelriber,

re: "he's just not a likeable person. Which is not something you can learn."

His father carries himself with class and distinction. Carlsen could learn from him if he chose to.
Funtime Funtime 11/29/2018 11:39
Caruana is a true gentleman and a professional. Gracious even when he's having a tough time.
Magnus is immature. It's strange because he comes from what appears to be a very good and stable family. His parents must cringe at times! Sad really.
That press conference after game 12. Magnus behaved poorly.
What gets me is that people seemed to be amused at his poor responses which only encourages him.
Keshava Keshava 11/29/2018 11:37
It is time to be rid of Agon - the 'corporation' that was gifted the rights to control the World Championship cycle. With the interest of all those major networks how many deep pocketed U.S. sponsors did they get? Did they even try? The anemic (compared to earlier championships) prize fund could have been considerably larger.
michaelriber michaelriber 11/29/2018 11:26
It's not so much that Carlsen played cynically, made this one of the msot boring WC matches ever and took a big fat dump on classical chess because he figured tiebreaks would be his best chance of winning - he was obviously right about that. He didn't decide the format - FIDE should be criticized for allowing the WC to be decided in rapid/blitz games, not the player who took advantage of it.

The big problem with Carlsen as WC and the no. 1 ambassador for the game is that, unlike Caruana, Mamedyarov or Ding, he's just not a likeable person. Which is not something you can learn.