
Round two report
By John Saunders
Round
2: Wednesday, December 9, 2009 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
1-0 |
Ni Hua |
Michael Adams |
½-½ |
Hikaru Nakamura |
Nigel Short |
½-½ |
David Howell |
Magnus Carlsen |
1-0 |
Luke McShane |
|
After two games played, Magnus Carlsen is already three points
clear of the field, on the 3-1-0 scoring system employed here. After the ‘Pearl
Spring’ (the tournament in China where Carlsen scored a runaway success)
comes the ‘London Winter’. Which means rain, of course, but so far
no water has fallen on Magnus Carlsen’s parade.
No. |
Player |
wins |
draws |
losses |
points |
Perf. |
1 |
Magnus Carlsen |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
3429 |
2 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2733 |
3 |
Luke McShane |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2754 |
4 |
Hikaru Nakamura |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2682 |
5 |
Michael Adams |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2656 |
6 |
David Howell |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2703 |
7 |
Nigel Short |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2413 |
8 |
Ni Hua |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2551 |
|
|
Scoring System:
3 - Points per win
1 - Point per draw
0 - Points per loss |
Let’s look at the games in the order in which they finished. All the
games were hard-fought and provided good entertainment to another large and
appreciative audience. The first players to take their places in the Commentary
Room were Nigel Short and David Howell after drawing a 44-move game which started
with Petroff’s Defence.

Lawrence Trent, David Howell, Nigel Short and Stephen Gordon comment for
visitors
in London and for a world-wide Playchess audience
This opening, named after Alexander Dmitreyvich Petroff (1794-1867), the best
Russian player of his day, is popular with super-grandmasters hoping for a solid
draw with Black but very unpopular with chess spectators who always fear they
are going to see a lifeless grandmaster draw. Not so in this tournament, of
course, as we are adhering to the so-called Sofia Rules. Do you need these rules
explained again? Yes, so do I and so do the players, it seems.

The lively exchanges have been recorded and will be made available later
Nigel Short told us at the press conference that, at some point during the
game, David Howell offered him a draw. Nigel wasn’t quite sure whether
this was strictly legal and, after the game finished asked the arbiter what
the procedure was. Arbiter Albert Vasse advised him that it was legal to offer
a draw but not legal to accept without consulting the arbiter who (with expert
advice) would pronounce it sufficiently dead for a draw to be agreed. It is
useful to have that explained in clear English as I’m sure we are all
a bit vague about the rights and wrongs of it. One other comment from Nigel
drew a big laugh from the audience at the beginning of the commentary session:
he said it was the first time in his career that he had been completely exhausted
after only one game of a tournament (a wry reference to his 163-move marathon
of the previous day, of course).
Whatever the motivating factor or Nigel Short’s generally positive approach
to the game, this was quite a spicy encounter where White might have won had
he found a few key moves at the right time (that is more or less Short’s
comment, paraphrased). It featured a sufficiently imbalanced pawn structure
and piece configuration to give computer engines a few problems in making a
convincing assessment – often a good sign of interesting chess. Nigel
had a strong positional advantage at one point but it seemed to fizzle out around
moves 30-34.
Short,Nigel (2707) - Howell,David (2597) [C42]
London Chess Classic London ENG (2), 09.12.2009
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.d4 d5 6.Bd3 Nc6 7.0-0 Be7 8.Re1
Bg4 9.Nc3 Nxc3 10.bxc3 0-0 11.Bf4 Qd7 12.Rb1 Bd6 13.Bxd6 cxd6 14.h3 Bh5 15.Rb5
Ne7 16.Qb1 b6 17.Nd2 Bg6 18.a4 Rac8 19.Qb2 Rfe8 20.Bf1 Qc7 21.c4 dxc4 22.Nxc4
Nc6 23.Ra1 Re4 24.c3 Rce8 25.Qd2 h6 26.a5 Nxa5 27.Nxa5 bxa5 28.Rbxa5 R8e7
29.f3. Offered an engine-generated alternative in the commentary
room, 29 f4!?, Nigel dismissed it: “Oh, that’s just a computer move
– that’s not the way I play chess.” 29...R4e6 30.h4
h5 31.c4 Rd7 32.d5 Ree7 33.Qd4 Qb8 34.Rb5 Rb7 35.Kf2 Rec7 36.Raa5 Rxb5 37.Rxb5
Rb7 38.Rxb7 Qxb7 39.c5 dxc5 40.Qxc5 Qb2+ 41.Ke3 Qe5+ 42.Kf2 Qb2+ 43.Ke3 Qe5+
44.Kf2 Qb2+ ½-½. A very interesting game, though, and
perhaps one that shows the Petroff has a little more bite than we think. [Click
to replay]
Kramnik,Vladimir (2772) - Ni Hua (2665) D15
London Chess Classic London ENG (2), 09.12.2009 [John Saunders]

1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 a6 5.Nf3 b5 6.b3 Bg4 7.h3 Bxf3 8.Qxf3 e5!?
Play gets lively very quickly in this variation. 9.dxe5 Bb4 10.Bd2 Bxc3
11.Bxc3 Ne4 12.Bb4 bxc4 13.Qg4 c5 14.f3. Of course, I could give you a hundred
variations from Fritz but let's take a deep breath and trust that the grandmasters
have correctly figured out the tactics around here. 14...cxb4 15.fxe4
Pause for breath. I think we should call this something pleasantly Anglo-Saxon
like the 'Pawn Brawl Variation' rather than using its current name in order
to attract the attention of street-fighting chessplayers. We are coming to the
end of a bruising fist fight between the little guys in the centre of the board.
It actually looks quite an entertaining line for club players to have a go at
but you would need to read up on the nuances of it before rolling up your sleeves
and getting stuck in. Nice to see Vladimir Kramnik ready to rumble in this way.
Incidentally, he turned up with visible designer stubble today after his defeat
of the day before. It recalls to mind the old story (probably apocryphal) that
Anatoly Karpov didn't wash his hair until after a defeat. I'm wondering if Vlad
has decided he isn't going to shave until he next tastes blood. 15...0-0
16.exd5 cxb3. I don't know about you but I couldn't have lived one more
move seeing those two big pawns in the centre and would have played the reflex
16...Qxd5 ; however, 17.Bxc4 Qxe5 18.0-0!? Qxe3+ 19.Kh1 and White gets good
compensation for the sacrificed pawn. 17.Qd4 Nd7 18.axb3 Qg5. Black's
plan is based on a long sequence of moves which both of them had worked out
but which has a sting in the tail in favour of White. 19.Qf4 Qxe5 20.Qxe5
Nxe5 21.Bxa6 Rfc8 22.Kd2 Rc3 23.Rhb1 f5 24.Ra4 Rc5
I suspect Ni Hua had seen it all to here but now White has a key move to maintain
his material edge. 25.e4! fxe4 25...Rd8 would allow White consolidate
with 26.Rxb4 fxe4 27.Bc4 and reach a comfortably winning ending. 26.Ke3 Rc2.
Black would like to play 26...Rxd5 but then 27.Bb7! Rd3+ 28.Kxe4 Re8 29.Ra8!
would ensure White's ultimate victory.; 26...Rc3+ 27.Kxe4 Re8 28.Kd4 also retains
an extra pawn. 27.Bd3! A neat way to simplify the position. 27...Rxa4
28.Bxc2 Ra2 29.Bxe4
That more or less concludes the major business of the game. Kramnik thought
he was winning comfortably here but admitted his finish may not have been the
most efficient. 29...Kf7 30.Rc1 Kf6 31.Rc2 Ra1. Exchanging the rooks
with 31...Rxc2 32.Bxc2 wouldn't offer much hope. One general principle that
even super-GMs tend to adhere to is that you should try to keep at least one
rook on the board if you are trying to defend an endgame a pawn down. Minor
piece endgames tend to be easier for the player with the advantage to convert
(except for opposite bishop endings, of course). 32.Kd4 Rd1+ 33.Kc5 h5 34.Rf2+
Ke7 35.Re2 Nd7+ 36.Kc6 Rc1+ 37.Bc2+ Kd8 38.Kd6 Nf6 39.Ke6 h4 40.d6 Rf1 41.Re5
Rf2. 41...Ne8 is more stubborn. 42.Bf5 g6 43.Bxg6 Nd7 44.Rg5 Rf6+ 45.Kd5
Nb6+ 46.Kc6 Nc8. White is not too bothered about the fate of the d-pawn
because he knows Black's other two pawns are ripe for the plucking. 47.Kc5
Nxd6 48.Bd3. 48.Bd3 Black has no convincing continuation, e.g. 48...Nf7
49.Rh5 Rf4 50.Bc4 and the knight doesn't have a good square: 50...Ke8 51.Bxf7+
Kxf7 1-0. [Click
to replay]

Vladimir Kramnik, Lawrence Trent, Stephen Gordon and Malcolm Pein...

... analysing the game against Ni Hua for the public

It is amazing for everyone who witnessed it in London and on Playchess how adept
Vladimir is with the computer and with what speed he rattles off complicated
variations
Carlsen,Magnus (2801) - McShane,Luke (2615) E94
London Chess Classic London ENG (2), 09.12.2009 [John Saunders]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 Na6. A
slightly off-beat way of playing the King's Indian Defence, but not bad. 8.Re1
Qe8 9.Bf1 Many players would have chosen 9 Be3 but, as in his previous game,
Magnus quite likes putting his bishops back on their original squares in a manoeuvring
game. 9...c6 10.Rb1. As a 12-year-old, Magnus played 10.d5 in the 2002
Gausdal tournament and won a long game. 10...Bg4 11.d5 c5
The typical closed structure of a King's Indian Defence game. White's game
will hinge around a pawn advance on the queenside, while Black will look to
mobilise on the kingside whilst keeping a careful on White's queenside play.
12.Be2 Kh8 13.a3 Bd7 14.b4 b6 15.Bg5 Ng8 16.Nb5 f6 17.Bh4 Qe7. This
opening can be very hard on dark-squared bishops. For example, 17...g5 would
force the h4 bishop back to g3 where it is hemmed in. The snag is that it does
much the same thing to Black's own bishop. If you were to suggest such a move
to a top player, they would probably tell you it was "/portals/all/_for_legal_reasons.jpg".
By that, they mean that it doesn't fit in with the general strategy of theopening.
18.Nd2 Nh6 19.Nf1 Rfc8 20.Ne3 Nc7 21.bxc5 Nxb5 22.cxb5 Rxc5 23.f3 Rac8 24.Bd3
Qf8 25.Bf2 f5. One of the signature moves for Black in a number of King's
Indian Defence variations. Sometimes it presages an exchange on e4, followed
by pressure on e4 or occupation of f4 by a minor piece, but rather more often
it is followed by f5-f4 and then an advance of the g and h pawns to start a
full-scale kingside attack. 26.a4 R5c7 27.h3 Bf6 28.Qd2 Bg5 29.a5 fxe4.
Here, 29...f4?! would only serve to undermine Black's kingside counterplay.
Magnus had already taken the precaution of playing h2-h3 to restrain a possible
advance on that side of the board. 30.fxe4 Nf7 31.axb6 axb6 32.Qe2 Rb7.
Bearing in mind that White's knight is about to come to c4 with pressure on
b6, one's mind turns momentarily to 32...Bxe3 but after 33.Bxe3 Rb7 34.Rf1 the
dark squares will be a nightmare for Black. A case of the cure being more lethal
than the disease. 33.Nc4 Qd8 34.Rf1 Kg7 35.Kh1 Be8 36.Qb2 Nh6
37.Bxb6! Luke McShane said he had missed this but there is probably
not much he could have done. 37...Qe7 37...Rxb6 38.Qf2 threatens mate
with Qf8 and also the rook on b6, so White would emerge with a healthy material
advantage. 38.Qf2 Rcb8 39.Rb3 Ng8 40.Be2 Nf6 41.Bf3. I've been racking
my brains to think of something intelligent to say about Carlsen's manoeuvre
Bd3-e2-f3, where it seems worse placed than it had been on d3, but I have to
give up. Perhaps White was concerned about the black knight entering the fray
via h5 and this stops it happening. 41...Rxb6!? 1-0. [Click
to replay]

Magnus Carlsen joins Lawrence Trent and Malcolm Pein in the
commentary room

After a while he is joined by Luke McShane in our "Playchess
studio"
Photos by Frederic Friedel in London
Schedule and results
Round
1: Tuesday, December 8, 2009 |
Magnus Carlsen |
1-0 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
Luke McShane |
1-0 |
Nigel Short |
David Howell |
½-½ |
Michael Adams |
Hikaru Nakamura |
½-½ |
Ni Hua |
|
|
Round
2: Wednesday, December 9, 2009 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
1-0 |
Ni Hua |
Michael Adams |
½-½ |
Hikaru Nakamura |
Nigel Short |
½-½ |
David Howell |
Magnus Carlsen |
1-0 |
Luke McShane |
|
|
Round
3: Thuesday, December 10, 2009 |
Luke McShane |
- |
Vladimir Kramnik |
David Howell |
- |
Magnus Carlsen |
Hikaru Nakamura |
- |
Nigel Short |
Ni Hua |
- |
Michael Adams |
Games – Report |
|
Friday, December 12, 2009
Rest day
|
|
Round
4: Saturday, December 12, 2009 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
- |
Michael Adams |
Nigel Short |
- |
Ni Hua |
Magnus Carlsen |
- |
Hikaru Nakamura |
Luke McShane |
- |
David Howell |
Games – Report |
|
Round
5: Sunday, December 13, 2009 |
David Howell |
- |
Vladimir Kramnik |
Hikaru Nakamura |
- |
Luke McShane |
Ni Hua |
- |
Magnus Carlsen |
Michael Adams |
- |
Nigel Short |
Games – Report |
|
Round
6: Monday, December 14, 2009 |
Vladimir Kramnik |
- |
Nigel Short |
Magnus Carlsen |
- |
Michael Adams |
Luke McShane |
- |
Ni Hua |
David Howell |
- |
Hikaru Nakamura |
Games – Report |
|
Round
7: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 |
Hikaru Nakamura |
- |
Vladimir Kramnik |
Ni Hua |
- |
David Howell |
Michael Adams |
- |
Luke McShane |
Nigel Short |
- |
Magnus Carlsen |
Games – Report |
|
Tournament Schedule
Monday |
7th December |
Press Conference + blindfold display |
|
Tuesday |
8th December |
Round 1 |
2.00pm |
Wednesday |
9th December |
Round 2 |
2.00pm |
Thursday |
10th December |
Round 3 |
2.00pm |
Friday |
11th December |
Rest day and Community / School events |
|
Saturday |
12th December |
Round 4 |
2.00pm |
Sunday |
13th December |
Round 5 |
2.00pm |
Monday |
14th December |
Round 6 |
2.00pm |
Tuesday |
15th December |
Round 7 |
12.00pm |