GCT Finals: Evenly matched

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
12/4/2019 – Two more draws were signed on Tuesday at the Grand Chess Tour semi-finals in London. Magnus Carlsen once again looked to surprise Maxime Vachier-Lagrave in the opening, to which the Frenchman responded with cautious play. Meanwhile, Ding Liren found himself in an inferior position in his game with White, but Levon Aronian was not in physical conditions to push for more. Rapid and blitz games will decide the finalists on Wednesday. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

No six-pointer win

When a football match is played between two teams in similar — usually leading — positions in the standings table, the match is said to be a six-pointer. Getting a win not only adds three points to the team that got the victory but also denies three points to the losing squad. At the Grand Chess Tour finals, getting a win in a classical game literally gains the winning player six points, getting him a considerable advantage before the rounds of rapid and blitz. In this year's semi-finals, no one collected a six-pointer, as all four games ended in draws.

After signing an eventful draw on Monday, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Magnus Carlsen explored a line of the Ruy Lopez that the world champion had tested with Black against Fabiano Caruana at the Zagreb GCT event. Back then, Caruana had got a favourable position, but was not able to score a full point. With 11.b3, Vachier-Lagrave deviated from that game, following a line used by Hikaru Nakamura at the Sinquefield Cup — also against Caruana:

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs. Carlsen
Position after 11.b3

Carlsen called 11.b3 "the safe way to play here". The ensuing variations gave the world champion what he described as "very easy play". When it was Vachier-Lagrave's turn to make his 17th move, the Frenchman took his time — more than 15 minutes — before going for simplifications:

 
Position after 16...Qc6

'MVL' needed to evaluate specific continuations before choosing the forcing 17.c4. Talking to Maurice Ashley, Carlsen explained:

Basically his mindset here was that he's trying to equalize, since, even though his structure is better, the knight on a3 is so bad that there isn't anything [else] to do for him.

The world champion had a slight edge, but when he realized 21...♛b7 did not get him real chances to fight for more, he opted for 21...d7 and went on to force a draw. 

This means two of the strongest players in quicker time controls will decide their match-up in Wednesday's rapid and blitz encounters. Two rapid games, with each win worth four points, will be followed by four blitz games, with each win worth two points. A fine spectacle is in store for the fans. Vachier-Lagrave:

It's gonna be a tough fight tomorrow, but I hope I can play my trumps. [...] I think it will be vital not to get out-prepared like I did today, so I'll need to be more ready for the openings, and I think it can be a fair fight.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Nxe4 6.d4 Be7 7.Re1 b5 8.Rxe4
Threatens to win with Bb3. C84: Closed Ruy Lopez: Unusual White 6th moves 8...d5 9.Nxe5 Nxe5 10.Rxe5 Bb3 is the strong threat.White is slightly better. bxa4 11.b3 0-0 12.Ba3 Bxa3 13.Nxa3 Re8 14.Rxe8+ Qxe8
15.Qd2N Predecessor: 15.Nb1 axb3 16.axb3 1/2-1/2 (36) Balogh,C (2630)-Radjabov,T (2715) Warsaw 2013 15...Bf5 The position is equal. 16.Re1 Qc6 17.c4 axb3 18.axb3 h6 19.cxd5 Qxd5 20.Nc4 Be6 21.Re5 Qd7 22.d5 Rd8 23.dxe6 Qxd2 24.Nxd2 Rxd2= Endgame KR-KR 25.g3
Black must now prevent e7. 25.f3 seems wilder. fxe6 26.Rxe6 a5 27.Re5 Ra2 28.h4 25...fxe6 26.Rxe6 Ra2 27.Rc6 Ra3 28.Rxc7 Rxb3 29.Ra7 Ra3 30.g4 h5 31.gxh5 Kh7 32.Kg2 Ra5 33.f4 Ra3 34.Ra8 a5 35.Ra6 a4 36.f5 Rb3 37.Rxa4 Rb5 38.Rf4 Kh6 39.f6 gxf6 40.Rxf6+ Kxh5 41.h4 Rb2+ 42.Rf2 Rxf2+ 43.Kxf2 Kxh4 Accuracy: White = 55%, Black = 83%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier Lagrave,M2777Carlsen,M2870½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20192.1

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

The other semi-final saw Levon Aronian getting a superior position out of the opening with the black pieces. Things seemed to be delving into regular paths until Ding Liren decided to force the issue with a pawn push:

 
Ding Liren vs. Aronian
Position after 10...Bh5

China's number one later declared that he saw nothing better than 11.g4, describing his play in the ensuing middlegame as "unnatural". After hearing Ding's interview, commentator Alejandro Ramirez gave some insights into the Chinese's declarations. Ramirez referred to Ding's use of the phrase "normal position", something that according to his experience with other Chinese players usually means "equal position". Apparently, Ding felt he needed to look for an advantage after Aronian's unprincipled exchange of pawns on move 8, which pushed him to look for more when the position did not really call for such measures.

As the game progressed, Aronian had reasons to be optimistic. But suddenly, on move 25, he went for a repetition:

 
Position after 25.Rh1

The draw was signed after 25...h4 26.f3 h8 27.d2 h4 28.f3 h8. Aronian did not attend the usual post-game interview, but Ding excused his rival by mentioning the fact that he still feels under the weather. With his typical mild demeanour, Ding concluded:

It seems he's not in his best physical shape, but I'm not in my best playing shape (smiles).   

Thus, the finalists of the 2017 World Cup — Aronian won that match-up — also go into the deciding third day of the semi-finals with the score tied. 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 0-0 5.Nf3 c5 6.Bd3 cxd4 7.exd4 d5 8.cxd5 exd5 9.0-0 Bg4 10.h3 B14: Caro-Kann: Panov-Botvinnik Attack with 5...e6 and 5...g6 10.Bg5 Bxc3 11.bxc3 Nbd7 12.h3 Bh5 13.c4 dxc4 14.Bxc4 Rc8 15.Rc1 h6 16.Bd2 Nb6 17.Bb3 Bxf3 18.Qxf3 Qxd4 19.Be3 Qe4 20.Qg3 Nh5 1/2-1/2 (33) Kovacevic,A (2564)-Ruck,R (2575) Bol 2013 10...Bh5 11.g4 Bg6 12.Ne2N The position is equal. Predecessor: 12.Bg5 Bxc3 13.bxc3 Nbd7 14.Ne5 Qc7 15.Nxg6 hxg6 16.Qb3 Nb6 17.Rab1 Rfe8 0-1 (41) Ahmed,E (2395)-Labib,I (2439) Cairo 2003 12...Nc6 13.Bg5! Re8 14.Bxg6 hxg6 15.Rc1 Qd7 16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.Qd3 Re4 18.Ng3 Re7 19.a3 Bd6 20.Rfe1 Rxe1+ 21.Rxe1 Kg7 22.Kg2 Nd8 23.Ne2 Ne6 24.Nd2 Rh8 25.Rh1 Rh4 26.Nf3 Rh8 27.Nd2! Rh4 28.Nf3 Rh8 Accuracy: White = 71%, Black = 44%. 28...Rh7 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ding,L2801Aronian,L2772½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20192.2

Ding Liren

Ding Liren | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour


Commentary webcast

Commentary by Jennifer Shahade, Peter Svidler, Alejandro Ramirez and Maurice Ashley


Schedule of the Grand Chess Tour Final

Times in UTC.

Date/Time Event Round
December 2, 16:00 Carlsen vs Vachier-Lagrave
Aronian vs Ding
Semi-final, Game 1
December 3, 16:00 Vachier-Lagrave vs Carlsen
Ding vs Aronian
Semi-final, Game 2
December 4 Semi-finals Rapid & Blitz  3-8
16:00 Rapid Game 1
17:30 Rapid Game 2
19:00 Blitz Game 1
19:30 Blitz Game 2
20:00 Blitz Game 3
20:30 Blitz Game 4
21:15 Playoff (If necessary)
December 5 Pro Biz Cup  
December 6, 16:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 7, 14:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 8 Final Rapid & Blitz  
14:00 Rapid Game 1
15:30 Rapid Game 2
17:00 Blitz Game 1
17:30 Blitz Game 2
18:00 Blitz Game 3
18:30 Blitz Game 4
19:15 Playoff (If necessary)

Closing ceremony to follow

Scoring

6 points for a win, 3 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Classic games
4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Rapid games 
2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw 0 points for a loss in the four blitz games


Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.