GCT Finals: Trying something new

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
12/3/2019 – Two very different draws set the GCT semi-finals in motion at the Olympia Conference Centre in London. Levon Aronian played it safe with White against Ding Liren as he did not feel well after a bad night's sleep, while Magnus Carlsen decided to challenge Maxime Vachier-Lagrave in a rare line of the Sicilian Najdorf. The draw signed by the world champion and the Frenchman was as memorable as it was complex. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

An antidote to the Najdorf?

The punishing calendar of an action-filled year meant three of the four players in the Grand Chess Tour finals flew straight from Kolkata to London. Levon Aronian, who recently announced he will not be participating at the fourth leg of the Grand Prix due to health reasons, was the one needing to play it safe with White to avoid a major disaster. The Armenian said he had not slept enough, and went for a tame line against Ding Liren. The Chinese star was prepared for the sideline with 6.g3, and did not put a foot wrong in the ensuing struggle. Aronian forced a variation that led to a draw on move 24:

 
Aronian vs. Ding Liren
Position after 23...Qc8

After 24.xa7 xc3, perpetual check put an end to the game: 25.xf7+ h7 26.g6+ g8 and so on. Aronian explained:

When you have enough energy to prepare for half an hour only, then it's one of those things...you just need to let it pass. As they say, it's like a fog, it has to pass, and then you fight.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 c5 5.cxd5 Nxd5 6.g3 Nxc3 7.bxc3 cxd4 8.cxd4 Bb4+ D41: Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch with 5 cxd5 9.Bd2 Bxd2+ 10.Qxd2 b6 11.Bg2 Bb7 12.0-0 0-0 13.Rfc1 13.Rfd1 Nd7 14.a4 Rb8 15.Qb4 Nf6 16.Rac1 Qd5 17.Rc7 Qd8 18.Rcc1 Qd5 19.Rc7 Qd8 20.Rcc1 1/2-1/2 (20) Bu,X (2718)-Ma,Q (2629) Hangzhou 2018 13...Nd7 14.Qd3 Nf6N Predecessor: 14...Rc8 15.Qa3 a6 16.Rxc8 Qxc8 1/2-1/2 (43) Benjamin,J (2544)-Javakhadze,Z (2459) Indianapolis 2016 15.Ne5 Bxg2 16.Kxg2 Qd5+ 17.f3 Rac8 18.e4 Qb7 19.Qa3 h5 20.h4 Rfd8 The position is equal. 21.Rxc8 Rxc8 22.Rc1 Rc7 23.Rc3 Qc8 24.Qxa7 Rxc3 25.Qxf7+ Kh7 26.Qg6+ Kg8 26...Kh8!? 27.Nf7+ Kg8 28.Nh6+ Kh8 29.Nf7+ Kg8 30.Nh6+ Kh8 31.Nf7+= 27.Qf7+ Kh7 28.Qg6+ Kg8 Accuracy: White = 61%, Black = 65%. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Aronian,L2772Ding,L2801½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.2

Levon Aronian

Levon Aronian is well-versed in knock-outs | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Now on to the remarkable fight of the day. Many a time Maxime Vachier-Lagrave's reputation as the single most knowledgeable Najdorf player in the world has been referred to (perhaps only Caruana's prowess in the system can contest this statement). At the same time, Magnus Carlsen has shown this year that he is not afraid to go for sharp fights against all comers. On Monday, the world champion challenged 'MVL' to fight it out in an Open Sicilian, and then played an unexpected seventh move:

 
Carlsen vs. Vachier-Lagrave
Position after 6...e6

7.f3 is a move mostly seen in lower-rated encounters. Vachier-Lagrave thought for over seven minutes before responding with 7...h6, and after 8.e3 the position looks like an English Attack, except that Black used an 'extra tempo' on ...h6. Vachier-Lagrave later confessed he was not sure whether this favoured White or Black.

Carlsen declared:

I wanted to try something new, get some positions that he's not that familiar with, and I think that succeeded fairly well.

A couple of mysterious-looking manoeuvres were seen on move 14:

 
Position after 13...Rc8

At this point, the world champion spent around 70 minutes on his next three moves: 14.g1 c7 15.g3 e5 16.g2. Carlsen was analysing the ramifications that would have ensued had his opponent gone for the critical 15...d5, when he had calculated 16.♗f4 e5 17.exd5 ♞xd5, with a crazy struggle.

 
Analysis diagram
Position after 17...Nxd5

Notice that Carlsen had foreseen this possibility when he played 13.e1, lining up his most powerful piece with the king in the centre. Ideas with ♗h3 and other tactical concepts would have come into play. 

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Magnus Carlsen

Carlsen returning to the stage while Vachier-Lagrave ponders his possibilities | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

None of that happened tough, and after Vachier-Lagrave castled short, it was a race to see who got more play against the opposite king. It turned out Black was quicker:

 
Position after 22.Re2

This is the point in which the Frenchman could have pushed his initiative on the queenside more energetically. Instead of 22...b4 or 22...♜fd8, Vachier-Lagrave chose the safer 22...d5, planning to create a battery with the queen on the d5-a2 diagonal. The game continued 23.g2 c4 24.b3 c5 25.xc5 (now White is a piece up) ♛a2+ 26.c1 fd8.

 
Position after 26...Rfd8

The threats against the white king are certainly menacing, but Carlsen had foreseen this position and knew that 27.c4 was good for him. In fact, Vachier-Lagrave later confessed he had not seen this pawn push in advance, which largely influenced his decision to simply secure a draw later on, when he could have kept going. The Frenchman responded with the correct 27...bxc4, threatening ...c3.

 
Position after 27...bxc4

Here Carlsen spent two minutes on 28.ed2, when 29.♘a4 would have given him chances to look for more. However, given the sharpness of the position, the world champion would have needed to find plenty of tactical shots in advance to go for this. As it happened, the draw was signed after 28...a1+ 29.c2 a2 30.c1 a1+, etcetera. 

Magnus Carlsen, Maurice Ashley

Magnus Carlsen interviewed by Maurice Ashley — a large audience wants to know what the world champion has to say | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

The commentators recognized the amazing effort shown by both players, with the game reminding all involved how the use of slow time controls can lead to amazing struggles, the kind that keep everyone on the edge of their seats for the duration. A still befuddled Carlsen declared after the game:

I think it goes with the choice of opening. Clearly, when you play with no forced lines at the beginning and castling on opposite sides, then it's going to be very complicated. Definitely we were both angling for that, and that we got. In such cases, we often make some mistakes as well. That's the way it is.

GM Daniel King analysed the game in full:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f3 h6 B95: Sicilian Najdorf: 6 Bg5 e6, unusual White 7th moves 8.Be3 b5 9.a3 Nbd7 10.Qd2 Bb7 11.0-0-0 h5 12.Kb1 Be7 12...Rc8 13.h3 h4 14.Bd3 Ne5 15.Rhe1 Be7 16.Bg5 Nc4 17.Bxc4 Rxc4 0-1 (38) Mekhitarian,K (2559)-Topalov,V (2760) Caxias do Sul 2016 13.Qe1 Rc8 14.Rg1N Predecessor: 14.Be2 g6 15.Nb3 d5 16.exd5 Nxd5 1/2-1/2 (41) Aryan,C (2430)-Arribas Lopez,A (2536) Madrid 2015 14...Qc7 15.g3 Ne5 16.Rg2 0-0 17.h3 d5 18.f4 Nc4 19.e5! Nxe3 20.Qxe3 Ne4 21.Nxe4 dxe4 22.Re2 Bd5 23.Bg2 Qc4 24.Nb3! Bc5 25.Nxc5 Qa2+ 25...Rxc5= remains equal. 26.b3 26.Bxe4 Qa2+ 27.Kc1 Rfc8 26...Qc3 26.Kc1± Rfd8
27.c4! bxc4
Threatens to win with ...c3! 28.Red2 Of course not 28.Bxe4?! Bxe4 29.Rxd8+ Rxd8= White should play 28.Na4!± Hoping for Nc3. Bc6 29.Rxd8+ Rxd8 30.Nc3 Double Attack Qa1+ 31.Nb1 28...Qa1+= 29.Kc2 Qa2 And now ...c3! would win.The position is equal. 30.Kc1! Reject 30.Bxe4 Rxc5 31.Rxd5 Qb3+ 32.Qxb3 cxb3+ 33.Kxb3 exd5 30...Qa1+ 31.Kc2 Qa2 Strongly threatening ...c3! 32.Kc1! Accuracy: White = 84%, Black = 67%. Much weaker is 32.Bxe4 Rxc5 33.Rxd5 Qb3+ 34.Qxb3 cxb3+ 35.Kxb3 exd5
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2870Vachier Lagrave,M2777½–½201911th LCC GCT Finals 20191.1

Commentary webcast

Commentary by Jennifer Shahade, Peter Svidler, Alejandro Ramirez and Maurice Ashley


Schedule of the Grand Chess Tour Final

Times in UTC.

Date/Time Event Round
December 2, 16:00 Carlsen vs Vachier-Lagrave
Aronian vs Ding
Semi-final, Game 1
December 3, 16:00 Vachier-Lagrave vs Carlsen
Ding vs Aronian
Semi-final, Game 2
December 4 Semi-finals Rapid & Blitz  3-8
16:00 Rapid Game 1
17:30 Rapid Game 2
19:00 Blitz Game 1
19:30 Blitz Game 2
20:00 Blitz Game 3
20:30 Blitz Game 4
21:15 Playoff (If necessary)
December 5 Pro Biz Cup  
December 6, 16:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 7, 14:00 Final Classical Game 1
December 8 Final Rapid & Blitz  
14:00 Rapid Game 1
15:30 Rapid Game 2
17:00 Blitz Game 1
17:30 Blitz Game 2
18:00 Blitz Game 3
18:30 Blitz Game 4
19:15 Playoff (If necessary)

Closing ceremony to follow

Scoring

6 points for a win, 3 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Classic games
4 points for a win, 2 points for a draw and 0 points for a loss in the two Rapid games 
2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw 0 points for a loss in the four blitz games


Links

 

Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.