GCT Zagreb: Three out of three for Nepomniachtchi

by Antonio Pereira
6/29/2019 – Ian Nepomniachtchi was the sole winner in Zagreb for a second day in a row, as he took down Shakhriyar Mamedyarov with the black pieces at the Croatian Grand Chess Tour. The Russian grandmaster now has a one-point lead over Wesley So and Magnus Carlsen, after the world champion finished on the bad side of a draw against world's number two Fabiano Caruana in the stellar match-up of the day. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Still perfect

Magnus Carlsen is not the only player that is having a remarkable 2019. Ian Nepomniachtchi finished the Tata Steel Masters in shared third place, scored '+2' at the World Team Championship (in six games) and won the first leg of the FIDE Grand Prix in Moscow. His only subpar performance was seen at the Abidjan GCT event, where he did not fare well in the Rapid section. 

And now, in Zagreb, at the second leg of the Grand Chess Tour, he could not have dreamed of a better start, as he is currently leading the event on a perfect 3 out of 3 score. His good results in classical chess have propelled him to the fourth spot in the live ratings list, where he is already closing on the 2800 mark. The fact that all four games that did not have him on one side of the board finished drawn in rounds two and three has helped him get a one-point lead in the standings table.

Results of Round 3
NameRtg.Nt.Pts.Pts.NameRtgNt.
2774
1
0-1
2
2775
2819
1
½-½
2875
2779
½
½-½
2754
2779
1
½-½
½
2805
2767
½
½-½
1
2752
2748
1
½-½
½
2754

Ian Nepomniachtchi, Maurice Ashley

The man of the hour, Ian Nepomniachtchi | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Nepomniachtchi's rivals from the first two rounds got the upper hand out of the opening, which perhaps incited Shakhriyar Mamedyarov to try something risky right off the bat. The structure that ensued was double-edged, with White having doubled pawns on the d-file and the initiative on the queenside, while Black built up his army on the kingside. Mamedyarov's greedy decision on move 18 was a turning point in the game:

 
Mamedyarov vs. Nepomniachtchi
Position after 17...Qg5

Black has just put his queen on h5 and his light-squared bishop is threatening to take on h3. Thus, it was high time White defended his king's position with 18.♔h1 or 18.♔h2, but Mamedyarov was in the mood to go for a win and played 18.xc7. The game continued 18...xh3 19.f1 f8 20.xb7 f6 21.a6, and Black decided to push White to further weaken his pawn structure on the kingside by chasing the queen through light-squared diagonals, starting with 21...c8:

 
Position after 21...Bc8

After 22.a4 d7 23.d1 g4 White had nothing better than 24.f3, which opens more lines for Black's attack. Three moves later, Mamedyarov tried to muddy the waters with a knight sacrifice:

 
Position after 26...h4

White went for the slightly desperate 27.e5, as after 27...dxe5 28.dxe5 the d and e-pawns combined with the queen and dark-squared bishop might give White some chances. Although this was a perfectly playable alternative for Nepomniachthi, going for 27...h3 was even more alluring, continuing the attack while avoiding unnecessary risks. 

It all went Black's way from that point on and Mamedyarov resigned on move 32.

Ian Nepomniachtchi

Ian Nepomniachtchi building up his attack | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Not a Sveshnikov

The stellar match-up of round three was the game that faced world's numbers one and two, Magnus Carlsen and Fabiano Caruana, who also were the contenders of the 2018 World Championship match in London. A day after Caruana had employed the Sicilian Sveshnikov — Carlsen's main weapon against 1.e4 during the last semester or so — the world champion steered away from the Sicilian by going for 1.e5. The players delved into a Spanish Opening which left theory on move 12.

Black had the pair of bishops and an active rook in exchange for a pawn, but on move 19 Caruana decided to give back his material edge in order to get some activity:

 
Caruana vs. Carlsen
Position after 18...Rb4

White could have gone for 19.♕f3, defending everything but also allowing Black to further improve his pieces with 19...♜be4. Instead, the American chose 19.c4, when his rival needs to give up his dark-squared bishop if he wants to restore material equality. There followed 19...xe3 20.xe3 xe3 21.fxe3 xc4 and now each of the players had a queen, a rook and bishops of opposite colours.

By move 36, the queens had left the board and it seemed like only White had some chances to fight for more. Not long afterwards, Carlsen offered a rook trade, trusting he would be able to defend the pure opposite-coloured bishops endgame:

 
Position after 42...Kxe4

It did not take long before White's d-pawn and Black's counterpart on the h-file were captured. Around that time, Hikaru Nakamura wrapped up his game against Sergey Karjakin and was interviewed by Maurice Ashley. The US champion declared that he felt White had a winning position, but the commentators thought the endgame was closer to a draw. 

Caruana kept trying until move 68, but Carlsen defended accurately and managed to get the half point. Stalemate put an end to the game:

 
Position after 67...Ka8

Caruana played 68.f4 and a handshake quickly followed.

Magnus Carlsen, Fabiano Caruana

A modern day classic, Magnus Carlsen vs Fabiano Caruana | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Players that are tough to beat

After a bloody first round, five out of six games on Thursday and Friday finished peacefully, with elite grandmasters showing good preparation, stubborn defensive technique and some degree of unwillingness to take unnecessary risks. In round three — besides Carlsen and Caruana — the players that fought the longest were Sergey Karjakin and Hikaru Nakamura.

Nakamura played a pet line of his in the Queen's Gambit Declined, which led to him getting an uncomfortable position with the black pieces. Karjakin converted his positional advantage into a tangible one when he chose to go into a rook endgame with 3 v 2 on the same flank:

 
Karjakin vs. Nakamura
Position after 37.Rxa5

Nobody thought White had much of a chance of winning this endgame, but Karjakin is known for his fighting spirit and kept trying until move 77. Nakamura later declared that these endgames require correct play to keep the balance, but that they should generally end up with the players splitting the point.

Grand Chess Tour Zagreb 2019

The elite of the chess world is back in Croatia | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Levon Aronian signed their third straight draws of the event, against Ding Liren and Vishy Anand, respectively. Meanwhile, Wesley So only needed 33 moves to get a half point with Black against Anish Giri — the American is currently sharing second place with Magnus Carlsen, thanks to his first round win over Ding Liren.

Anish Giri, Wesley So

Well-prepared pros, Anish Giri and Wesley So | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Grand Chess Tour Zagreb 2019

A crowded playing hall in Zagreb, with enthusiastic kids in the mix | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Standings after Round 3

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
TBPerf.
1
2775
3.0
3
3.50
3587
2
2875
2.0
3
2.25
2913
3
2754
2.0
3
2.25
2913
4
2779
1.5
3
2.25
2770
5
2819
1.5
3
2.00
2801
6
2752
1.5
3
1.75
2775
7
2748
1.5
3
1.50
2778
8
2779
1.0
3
1.75
2669
9
2767
1.0
3
1.75
2676
10
2805
1.0
3
1.50
2635
11
2774
1.0
3
1.25
2634
12
2754
1.0
3
1.25
2655
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger

Commentary webcast

Commentary by GM Yasser Seirawan, IM Jovanka Houska and GM Alejandro Ramirez


All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 e6 4.Bxc6 bxc6 5.d3 Ne7 6.h4 h5 B30: Sicilian: 2...Nc6 3 Bb5, lines without ...g6 7.e5 d6 8.exd6 Ng6 White is slightly better. 9.Nfd2N Predecessor: 9.Bg5 f6 10.Qe2 Bxd6 11.Qe4 Ne7 12.Nbd2 fxg5 13.hxg5 e5 0-1 (33) Lu,S (2514)-Yu,Y (2615) Beijing 2012 9...Bxd6 10.Nc4 Be7 11.Nc3 Ba6 12.Qf3 Bxc4 13.Qxc6+ Kf8 ...Rc8 is the strong threat. 14.dxc4 Nxh4 15.0-0 Nf5 16.Ne2 16.Rd1!? Qe8 17.Qe4= 16...Rc8 17.Qa4 17.Qe4= 17...Rc7 18.Bf4 Rd7 19.c3
19.Ng3= 19...g5!       Black has strong initiative. 20.Rad1? 20.Be5 f6 21.Rad1 Rxd1 22.Rxd1 20...Rxd1-+ 21.Rxd1
21...Qa8! 22.Bc7 h4 23.f3 h3 Accuracy: White = 39%, Black = 64%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2779Carlsen,M28750–12019B30GCT Zagreb 20191.1
Caruana,F2819Nakamura,H27541–02019D37GCT Zagreb 20191.2
So,W2754Ding,L28051–02019A23GCT Zagreb 20191.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Aronian,L2752½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20191.4
Anand,V2767Nepomniachtchi,I27750–12019C55GCT Zagreb 20191.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Karjakin,S2748½–½2019E20GCT Zagreb 20191.6
Carlsen,M2875Anand,V2767½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20192.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Caruana,F28191–02019B33GCT Zagreb 20192.2
Ding,L2805Karjakin,S2748½–½2019E11GCT Zagreb 20192.3
Aronian,L2752Giri,A2779½–½2019E05GCT Zagreb 20192.4
So,W2754Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019A30GCT Zagreb 20192.5
Nakamura,H2754Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019D85GCT Zagreb 20192.6
Caruana,F2819Carlsen,M2875½–½2019C84GCT Zagreb 20193.1
Mamedyarov,S2774Nepomniachtchi,I27750–12019E61GCT Zagreb 20193.2
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Ding,L2805½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.3
Anand,V2767Aronian,L2752½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.4
Giri,A2779So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.5
Karjakin,S2748Nakamura,H2754½–½2019D37GCT Zagreb 20193.6
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20194.1
Carlsen,M2875Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019A16GCT Zagreb 20194.2
So,W2754Anand,V2767½–½2019A20GCT Zagreb 20194.3
Aronian,L2752Caruana,F2819½–½2019D04GCT Zagreb 20194.4
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Giri,A2779½–½2019C83GCT Zagreb 20194.5
Ding,L2805Nakamura,H2754½–½2019D27GCT Zagreb 20194.6
Nakamura,H2754Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019D85GCT Zagreb 20195.1
Karjakin,S2748Carlsen,M2875½–½2019D31GCT Zagreb 20195.2
Caruana,F2819So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20195.3
Anand,V2767Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019B52GCT Zagreb 20195.4
Giri,A2779Ding,L28050–12019D45GCT Zagreb 20195.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Aronian,L2752½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20195.6
Ding,L2805Nepomniachtchi,I27751–02019A20GCT Zagreb 20196.1
Carlsen,M2875Nakamura,H27541–02019D37GCT Zagreb 20196.2
So,W2754Mamedyarov,S27741–02019A16GCT Zagreb 20196.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Caruana,F28190–12019C78GCT Zagreb 20196.4
Aronian,L2752Karjakin,S27481–02019C67GCT Zagreb 20196.5
Giri,A2779Anand,V2767½–½2019C81GCT Zagreb 20196.6
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Carlsen,M28750–12019B30GCT Zagreb 20197.1
Karjakin,S2748So,W2754½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20197.2
Caruana,F2819Giri,A2779½–½2019D78GCT Zagreb 20197.3
Nakamura,H2754Aronian,L2752½–½2019C65GCT Zagreb 20197.4
Anand,V2767Ding,L2805½–½2019C88GCT Zagreb 20197.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019E60GCT Zagreb 20197.6
Ding,L2805Carlsen,M28750–12019E05GCT Zagreb 20198.1
So,W2754Nakamura,H27541–02019C67GCT Zagreb 20198.2
Aronian,L2752Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019D91GCT Zagreb 20198.3
Anand,V2767Caruana,F2819½–½2019B52GCT Zagreb 20198.4
Giri,A2779Mamedyarov,S27741–02019B51GCT Zagreb 20198.5
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20198.6
Carlsen,M2875Aronian,L2752½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20199.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2775So,W2754½–½2019C65GCT Zagreb 20199.2
Caruana,F2819Ding,L2805½–½2019C90GCT Zagreb 20199.3
Karjakin,S2748Giri,A2779½–½2019D37GCT Zagreb 20199.4
Mamedyarov,S2774Anand,V27671–02019D24GCT Zagreb 20199.5
Nakamura,H2754Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019B51GCT Zagreb 20199.6
So,W2754Carlsen,M2875½–½2019E34GCT Zagreb 201910.1
Caruana,F2819Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019B01GCT Zagreb 201910.2
Ding,L2805Aronian,L2752½–½2019A14GCT Zagreb 201910.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019B11GCT Zagreb 201910.4
Giri,A2779Nakamura,H2754½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 201910.5
Anand,V2767Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 201910.6
Carlsen,M2875Vachier-Lagrave,M27791–02019D85GCT Zagreb 201911.1
Aronian,L2752So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 201911.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Giri,A27790–12019B51GCT Zagreb 201911.3
Karjakin,S2748Caruana,F2819½–½2019A61GCT Zagreb 201911.4
Mamedyarov,S2774Ding,L2805½–½2019D41GCT Zagreb 201911.5
Nakamura,H2754Anand,V2767½–½2019E35GCT Zagreb 201911.6

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.