Zagreb GCT: A second win for Nepomniachtchi

by Antonio Pereira
6/28/2019 – Round two of the Croatian Grand Chess Tour finished with only one decisive game, but there was no lack of excitement as some big misses led to unexpected results. Ian Nepomniachtchi defeated Fabiano Caruana from a clearly inferior position, Magnus Carlsen could not convert a knight endgame a pawn up against Vishy Anand and Ding Liren failed to make the most of his advantage against Sergey Karjakin. These results left Nepomniachtchi as the sole leader with 2 out of 2. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

Turning it around

On opening day at the second leg of the 2019 Grand Chess Tour, Ian Nepomniachtchi found himself in a complicated position out of the opening against Vishy Anand, but managed to bounce back and eventually got a 32-move victory with Black. The Russian ace then went on to recover from an even worse position in round two, against Fabiano Caruana, and is now the sole leader in Zagreb.

But Caruana was not the only player to squander an advantegeous position on Thursday. Magnus Carlsen simplified into an endgame a pawn up against Vishy Anand but could not convert it into a win despite trying for 72 moves, while Ding Liren split the point with Sergey Karjakin after getting a strong initiative by giving up an exchange.

Results of Round 2

Ian Nepomniachtchi, Magnus Carlsen

Ian Nepomniachtchi and Magnus Carlsen crossing paths during round two | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

After Magnus Carlsen got good results with the Sicilian Sveshnikov at last year's World Championship match — and all through 2019 subsequently — his rival from said match, Fabiano Caruana, decided to give it a go with Black against Ian Nepomniachtchi. The players followed mainstream theory until move nine, repeating what had been seen in the London match and in many first-rate games from this year, including Svidler v Caruana from the Grenke Classic and Nepomniachtchi v Carlsen from the Abidjan GCT event.

The position got increasingly sharper, especially when Nepomniachtchi decided to castle queenside on move 20:

 
Nepomniachtchi vs. Caruana
Position after 20.0-0-0

Caruana immediately put his bishop on the long diagonal with 20...f6, targeting White's king position — later on, he also gave up his a-pawn in order to open up that file for his rook. The American had his pieces lined up for an attack, but he did not find the most effective continuation in a critical position:

 
Position after 30.Nxa5

Black's 30...xc3 does not give away the advantage but both 30...♝b5 and 30...♞c5 were better — and safer — alternatives. After the text, there followed 31.bxc3 a4+ 32.b1 xd1, when Black still had the upper hand with the rook and pawn against White's two pieces. 

But converting this position against Russia's number one was never going to be easy. Caruana did not find the precise way forward and the computer started showing a 0.00 evaluation. By move 38, it was Caruana who needed to find an only move to keep the equality:

 
Position after 38.Bc2

The only way to maintain the balance was with 38...♝c1+ as 39.♘xc1 is met with 39...♛g2, getting back the piece, defending the e4-pawn and doubling on the second rank. Instead, Black played 38...c4, allowing White to capture the d-pawn with 39.e6 f6 40.xd6

With three pieces protecting his king, White started pushing his d-pawn, which turned out to be a more valuable asset than Black's passer on the e-file. The game finished on move 50:

 
Position after 49...Qc2

Caruana resigned after 50.xf6, as the d-pawn will inevitably become a queen.

Ian Nepomniachtchi, Fabiano Caruana

The current leader in Zagreb, Ian Nepomniachtchi, had to work hard against Fabiano Caruana | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Missed chances

It has been a while already, but we must not forget that the last world champion prior to Magnus Carlsen was Vishy Anand. The Indian will turn 50 this year and is still going strong, currently placed ninth in the official FIDE ratings list. Unfortunately for him, though, on Thursday he had Black against Carlsen for a fifth time in a row, a daunting task for any human alive at the time.

The "Tiger of Madras" went into a theoretical line of the Vienna Variation out of a QGD and, by move 19, found himself in a slightly inferior position from a strategical point of view:

 
Carlsen vs. Anand
Position after 19.Rfd1

Carlsen, naturally, started looking for a way to get something with White, making use of Black's slightly damaged pawn structure. The world champion kept putting pressure on his opponent until gaining a pawn on move 36. Soon enough, all the rooks had left the board and White was a pawn up in a knight's endgame:

 
Position after 40...Kxh5

White has a passer on the f-file and an active king — it was not difficult to predict a Carlen's win at this point, especially given the phenomenal form he has shown this year. But Anand is a fighter at heart and kept looking for chances until the end. Carlsen was not as precise as the position called for and eventually gave up half a point, despite temporarily being a queen and a knight up: 

 
Position after 68.f8Q

This endgame is actually a draw. Anand continued to show correct technique until signing the peace treaty after 78 moves.

Magnus Carlsen

World champion Magnus Carlsen could not break Vishy Anand's defences | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Meanwhile, Ding Liren was trying to create a model game with the white pieces against Sergey Karjakin. After thinking for over eleven minutes, the Chinese star decided to give up an exchange in order to get the initiative against Black's undeveloped army:

 
Ding Liren vs. Karjakin
Position after 18...dxc4

Although 19.bxc4 is totally playable, Ding felt 19.xc4 was worth a try, given the fact that Black's dark-squared bishop is his best-placed piece on the board. Karjakin accepted the challenge by responding with 19...xc1.

In the battle that ensued, Black lost his kingside pawns (except the one on the h-file) and found himself defending against a set of well-coordinated attackers. However, Ding could not find the right idea in a critical position:

 
Position after 37...Rf8

Here, and at some other points of the game, the computer suggested that the best course of action was to opt for 38.♗c4, when exchanging the pieces would be bad for Black, while the white bishop would be excellently placed on the a2-g8 diagonal otherwise. Ding chose 38.g4 instead, and Karjakin went on to prove his defensive prowess until getting a 51-move draw.

Ding Liren

Ding Liren apparently knew that he had thrown away a great chance | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour 

The other three draws of the day were less eventful, with both Wesley So vs Maxime Vachier-Lagrave and Hikaru Nakamura vs. Shakhriyar Mamedyarov lasting less than thirty moves. Levon Aronian and Anish Giri played a rook endgame with 3 v 2 pawns on the same flank until move 55, but the result was never in doubt.

Vishy Anand

Former world champion Vishy Anand taking a stroll | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Fabiano Caruana, Magnus Carlsen

The board  is already set up for the top game of round three | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Grand Chess Tour

Standings after Round 2

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
TBPerf.
1
2775
2.0
2
1.50
3593
2
2754
1.5
2
1.00
2985
3
2875
1.5
2
0.75
2966
4
2779
1.0
2
1.25
2753
5
2774
1.0
2
0.75
2751
6
2752
1.0
2
0.75
2779
7
2748
1.0
2
0.75
2790
8
2819
1.0
2
0.50
2765
9
2767
0.5
2
0.75
2632
10
2805
0.5
2
0.50
2558
11
2779
0.5
2
0.50
2621
12
2754
0.5
2
0.50
2604
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger

Commentary webcast

Commentary by GM Yasser Seirawan, IM Jovanka Houska and GM Alejandro Ramirez


All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 e6 4.Bxc6 bxc6 5.d3 Ne7 6.h4 h5 B30: Sicilian: 2...Nc6 3 Bb5, lines without ...g6 7.e5 d6 8.exd6 Ng6 White is slightly better. 9.Nfd2N Predecessor: 9.Bg5 f6 10.Qe2 Bxd6 11.Qe4 Ne7 12.Nbd2 fxg5 13.hxg5 e5 0-1 (33) Lu,S (2514)-Yu,Y (2615) Beijing 2012 9...Bxd6 10.Nc4 Be7 11.Nc3 Ba6 12.Qf3 Bxc4 13.Qxc6+ Kf8 ...Rc8 is the strong threat. 14.dxc4 Nxh4 15.0-0 Nf5 16.Ne2 16.Rd1!? Qe8 17.Qe4= 16...Rc8 17.Qa4 17.Qe4= 17...Rc7 18.Bf4 Rd7 19.c3
19.Ng3= 19...g5!       Black has strong initiative. 20.Rad1? 20.Be5 f6 21.Rad1 Rxd1 22.Rxd1 20...Rxd1-+ 21.Rxd1
21...Qa8! 22.Bc7 h4 23.f3 h3 Accuracy: White = 39%, Black = 64%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2779Carlsen,M28750–12019B30GCT Zagreb 20191.1
Caruana,F2819Nakamura,H27541–02019D37GCT Zagreb 20191.2
So,W2754Ding,L28051–02019A23GCT Zagreb 20191.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Aronian,L2752½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20191.4
Anand,V2767Nepomniachtchi,I27750–12019C55GCT Zagreb 20191.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Karjakin,S2748½–½2019E20GCT Zagreb 20191.6
Carlsen,M2875Anand,V2767½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20192.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Caruana,F28191–02019B33GCT Zagreb 20192.2
Ding,L2805Karjakin,S2748½–½2019E11GCT Zagreb 20192.3
Aronian,L2752Giri,A2779½–½2019E05GCT Zagreb 20192.4
So,W2754Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019A30GCT Zagreb 20192.5
Nakamura,H2754Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019D85GCT Zagreb 20192.6
Caruana,F2819Carlsen,M2875½–½2019C84GCT Zagreb 20193.1
Mamedyarov,S2774Nepomniachtchi,I27750–12019E61GCT Zagreb 20193.2
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Ding,L2805½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.3
Anand,V2767Aronian,L2752½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.4
Giri,A2779So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20193.5
Karjakin,S2748Nakamura,H2754½–½2019D37GCT Zagreb 20193.6
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20194.1
Carlsen,M2875Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019A16GCT Zagreb 20194.2
So,W2754Anand,V2767½–½2019A20GCT Zagreb 20194.3
Aronian,L2752Caruana,F2819½–½2019D04GCT Zagreb 20194.4
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Giri,A2779½–½2019C83GCT Zagreb 20194.5
Ding,L2805Nakamura,H2754½–½2019D27GCT Zagreb 20194.6
Nakamura,H2754Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019D85GCT Zagreb 20195.1
Karjakin,S2748Carlsen,M2875½–½2019D31GCT Zagreb 20195.2
Caruana,F2819So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 20195.3
Anand,V2767Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019B52GCT Zagreb 20195.4
Giri,A2779Ding,L28050–12019D45GCT Zagreb 20195.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Aronian,L2752½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20195.6
Ding,L2805Nepomniachtchi,I27751–02019A20GCT Zagreb 20196.1
Carlsen,M2875Nakamura,H27541–02019D37GCT Zagreb 20196.2
So,W2754Mamedyarov,S27741–02019A16GCT Zagreb 20196.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Caruana,F28190–12019C78GCT Zagreb 20196.4
Aronian,L2752Karjakin,S27481–02019C67GCT Zagreb 20196.5
Giri,A2779Anand,V2767½–½2019C81GCT Zagreb 20196.6
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Carlsen,M28750–12019B30GCT Zagreb 20197.1
Karjakin,S2748So,W2754½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20197.2
Caruana,F2819Giri,A2779½–½2019D78GCT Zagreb 20197.3
Nakamura,H2754Aronian,L2752½–½2019C65GCT Zagreb 20197.4
Anand,V2767Ding,L2805½–½2019C88GCT Zagreb 20197.5
Mamedyarov,S2774Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019E60GCT Zagreb 20197.6
Ding,L2805Carlsen,M28750–12019E05GCT Zagreb 20198.1
So,W2754Nakamura,H27541–02019C67GCT Zagreb 20198.2
Aronian,L2752Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019D91GCT Zagreb 20198.3
Anand,V2767Caruana,F2819½–½2019B52GCT Zagreb 20198.4
Giri,A2779Mamedyarov,S27741–02019B51GCT Zagreb 20198.5
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 20198.6
Carlsen,M2875Aronian,L2752½–½2019D39GCT Zagreb 20199.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2775So,W2754½–½2019C65GCT Zagreb 20199.2
Caruana,F2819Ding,L2805½–½2019C90GCT Zagreb 20199.3
Karjakin,S2748Giri,A2779½–½2019D37GCT Zagreb 20199.4
Mamedyarov,S2774Anand,V27671–02019D24GCT Zagreb 20199.5
Nakamura,H2754Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2019B51GCT Zagreb 20199.6
So,W2754Carlsen,M2875½–½2019E34GCT Zagreb 201910.1
Caruana,F2819Mamedyarov,S2774½–½2019B01GCT Zagreb 201910.2
Ding,L2805Aronian,L2752½–½2019A14GCT Zagreb 201910.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Nepomniachtchi,I2775½–½2019B11GCT Zagreb 201910.4
Giri,A2779Nakamura,H2754½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 201910.5
Anand,V2767Karjakin,S2748½–½2019C67GCT Zagreb 201910.6
Carlsen,M2875Vachier-Lagrave,M27791–02019D85GCT Zagreb 201911.1
Aronian,L2752So,W2754½–½2019C54GCT Zagreb 201911.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2775Giri,A27790–12019B51GCT Zagreb 201911.3
Karjakin,S2748Caruana,F2819½–½2019A61GCT Zagreb 201911.4
Mamedyarov,S2774Ding,L2805½–½2019D41GCT Zagreb 201911.5
Nakamura,H2754Anand,V2767½–½2019E35GCT Zagreb 201911.6

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.