For Bobby Fischer's 77th birthday

by Frederic Friedel
4/5/2020 – Last month, on March 9 2020, Bobby Fischer would have turned 77. We could have commemorated it with a detailed biography of the 11th World Champion – but who doesn't know all the details of the life of the most charismatic and enigmatic player in the history of the game? So instead I would like to retell one of my favourite stories, a birthday present to Fischer, wherever he might be. It is a lovely story, and has ideas that you can use in your own games.

No other World Champion was more infamous both inside and outside the chess world than Bobby Fischer. On this DVD, a team of experts shows you the winning techniques and strategies employed by the 11th World Champion.

Grandmaster Dorian Rogozenco delves into Fischer’s openings, and retraces the development of his repertoire. What variations did Fischer play, and what sources did he use to arm himself against the best Soviet players? Mihail Marin explains Fischer’s particular style and his special strategic talent in annotated games against Spassky, Taimanov and other greats. Karsten Müller is not just a leading international endgame expert, but also a true Fischer connoisseur.

The following story is taken from the book "Chess Phenomenon Bobby Fischer" by Aleksander Pasternjak. It is a lovely (and loving) work, originally published in Slovenian and now for many years out of print. A German language version was published without a date by Copress Verlag in Munich, excellently translated by Darko Dolinar. There are a few used copies available in Amazon Germany – I'd grab them if I were you. My own copy is in mint shape, and I tend to read it once every ten years.

To give you a feel for the contents here is some narrative from the first chapter – dutifully translated into English. At the end of the article you will find the games, with full analysis, on our JavaScript replay board. There you can analyse (with engine support) and pose any "What-if" and "Why-not" questions that might occur to you. And apart from that: it is not unlikely that you will learn some new tricks in the Sicilian.

The Sicilian Vespers

By Aleksander Pasternjak

It is the final round of the Portoroz Interzonal in 1958, in which the six finalists for the Candidates tournament to find a challenger to Mikhail Botvinnik's World Championship title will be chosen. The youngest participant is just fifteen years old and is playing against one of the tournament leaders. Robert James Fischer has black against Svetozar Gligoric, twenty years his senior and an experienced world-class GM.

Svetozar Gligoric – Robert Fischer [B98]
Portoroz Interzonal Portoroz (21), 1958

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Qf3 h6 9.Bh4 g5!?

Gligoric stares at the lad in amazement. Bobby Fischer has just played a daring idea of Herman Pilnik in the Sicilian Najdorf. It is not just a surprise to his opponent, it has the entire playing hall stunned. Fischer has gone for the notorious "Sicilian Vespers."

The boy is covering his eyes with his long, bony fingers. He is calm, his gaze is steady, the eyes occasionally dart across the chessboard. Even at this early age Fischer is considered a great expert in the Sicilian Defence. His Yugoslav opponent is baffled: is the lad trying to trick him with some new analysis, or is he simply desperate?

Gligoric vs Fischer at the Interzonal in 1958 in Portoroz

This famous encounter between Gligoric and Fischer actually began three years earlier. Fischer was using a line that had suffered an extraordinary fate at the Interzonal in Gothenburg 1955. The Argentinean players, Miguel Najdorf, Oscar Panno and German Pilnik had based their preparation for this tournament on the Najdorf Variation, but Paul Keres had defeated Panno with a novelty in the first part of the tournament, refuting their entire strategy of the South American team.

The Argentineans were in panic. But on a free day the temperamental Pilnik had come up with the 9...g5 improvement that seemed to give them a powerful weapon against Keres' new move. The Argentinean team and their helper spent 24 hours analysing every aspect of the devilishly clever Pilnik idea. In the end the great Najdorf made the decision: we play 9...g5.

This led to the "total chess war" in Gothenburg. Argentina was the second-strongest chess nation after the Soviet Union, and in round 14 chance would have it that the three top players had black against the leading Russians Efim Geller, Boris Spassky and Paul Keres.

About half an hour into the round the Argentinean plan struck like lightening out of a clear sky. Almost simultaneously the three GMs played the fateful move 9...g5, and the Soviet "analysis engine" came to a grinding halt.

The tension in the playing hall was tremendous. Three demo boards showed identical positions, and while the Russians sat there in deepest thought Miguel Najdorf wandered around the hall, merrily asking people what they thought of his position. One of them was Svetozar Gligoric, who was writing chess columns in Gothenburg.

On the boards the sharpest tactician amongst the Russian players, Efim Geller, was the first to play. After 30 minutes he played a three-move combination, sacrificing a knight, offering a bishop and then playing a quiet bishop move: 10.fxg5 Nfd7 11.Nxe6 fxe6 12.Qh5+ Kf8 13.Bb5 Ne5 14.Bg3. Spassky and Keres took almost an hour to find the same moves, which marked the end of the Argentinean dream. All three games were lost by Najdorf, Panno and Pilnik in very similar fashion.

That is the story of the "Sicilian Vespers", the tale of a variation that had appeared like a comet and gone down in a blaze. Who would ever dare to play the line again? The answer: a fifteen-year-old, and in a decisive game, one of the most important in his career!

Fischer arriving in Portoroz

Fischer knew that Gligoric had witnessed the events in Gothenburg, and that he knew all the analysis the Soviets had come up with. In fact earlier in the year he had actually asked Gligoric innocently about the variation. It was the last thing the Yugoslav could have expected, to see the move 9...g5 played by his last-round opponent against him.

With some female admirers

In secret Fischer had been working very hard on the Pilnik line, spending many hours unravelling its secrets, even studying the Russian language bulletins from the tournaments in Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk in search of new ideas. In the day before his game against Gligoric he ordered breakfast, lunch and dinner in his hotel room, going over the material he had produced in his Brooklyn laboratory, agonising over the decision whether to play the line in this decisive game or not.

10.fxg5 Nfd7 11.Nxe6 fxe6 12.Qh5+ Kf8 13.Bb5 Rh7!N

At the board in Portoroz Gligoric slowly began to realise that he had run into the firestorm of home preparation. The psychological advantage was entirely on Fischer's side. After the 13th move the young man got up for the first time and wandered around the hall. He was on familiar terrain and could spend some time looking at the other games. Gligoric on the other hand sat there, bent over the board, deep in thought. Behind him stood Mikhail Tal with sparkling eyes, obviously enjoying the complications he could see in this dramatic position.

Chess is like a symphony. The first phase of this piece was a furioso, leading to a quiet second movement, a positional struggle between two very different personalities. Fischer's 13th move blocked the path to White's mating attack, the rook on h7 held the tattered black position together with unusual tactical plans. But most importantly it forced his opponent to use all his energy solving problems which the lad from the USA had worked out up to move 30 at home.

But it was not without risk. Take a look at the standings before the final (21st) round:

Fischer's main rivals had easier tasks: David Bronstein had to play Rodolfo Cardosso, a Philippine IM who had lost five games in a row in this tournament. Fridrik Olafsson faced IM Boris de Greiff from Columbia, the second-last in the table. Ludek Pachman and Laszlo Szabo had Raul Sanguinetti and Oscar Panno, both without any further ambitions in this tournament.

In the previous 20th round Fischer had almost lost his place in the Candidates. Playing white against Cardosso he ran into some home preparation and, after taking a poisoned pawn on b7, found himself into a hopeless position. But with incredible determination Fischer managed to find all the right moves and, in a filigree 62-move effort he beat Cardosso to retain his chances for the Candidates.

Now in the last round Fischer had to play for a win against one of the top players of the tournament (and the world), and he had to do it with the black pieces. Svetozar Gligoric had won four of his last five games and was in the form of his life.

14.Qg6 Rf7 15.Qxh6+ Kg8 16.Qg6+ Rg7 17.Qxe6+ Kh8 18.Bxd7 Nxd7 19.0-0-0 Ne5 20.Qd5 Bg4 21.Rdf1 Bxg5+ 22.Bxg5 Qxg5+ 23.Kb1

At some stage Gligoric proposes a draw, which Fischer rejects, forcing the Yugoslav GM to play on with three pawns for a piece. Fischer is determined to win the game and maintains his positional advantage, even though Gligoric plays some very clever defensive moves.

23...Qe7 24.Qd2 Be6 25.g3 Rd8 26.Rf4 Qg5 27.Qf2 Kg8 28.Rd1 Rf7 29.b3 Qe7 30.Qd4 Ng6 31.Rxf7 Qxf7 32.Qe3

The tension has reached its highest point, Bobby Fischer is twitching in anticipation. But at this dramatic moment he sees a tragedy taking place on an adjacent board. David Bronstein, who had not dropped a single game so far in this tournament (or in two previous Interzonals) has a completely lost position in his game to Cardoso.

Suddenly the tension is gone, Fischer has a sure place in the Candidates. In the above position he accepts the draw and leaves the tournament hall beaming and proud. When asked by journalists about his greatest achievement in Portoroz he says "overtaking the great David Bronstein!" And his goal in life: "To fight for the world championship title against Mikhail Botvinnik."

Replay and analyse the games from this article

You probably know that in our replay boards there are a large number of functions you can use to really appreciate the games. Recently we published a comprehensive tutorial on how to get the most out of the live broadcast game viewer. Learn about all the powerful features and buttons that make the ChessBase's replay one of the best watching experiences around.

One big advantage is that you can start an engine (fan icon) that will help you to analyse. You can get multiple lines of analysis by clicking the + button to the right of the engine analysis window. The "!" key, incidentally, shows you the threat in any position, which is incredibly useful in the case of unclear moves.

There is one more thing you can do that is a lot of fun: Clicking on the rook icon below the notation window allows you to play out any position in the game against Fritz, at your level of playing strength (e.g. "Club Player"). The folder icon will retrieve lot more games in this line.

Note that your analysis, where you can delete, move or promote lines, is stored in the notation as new variations. In the end you will find the game with your analysis in the cloud. So nothing is ever lost.


Editor-in-Chief emeritus of the ChessBase News page. Studied Philosophy and Linguistics at the University of Hamburg and Oxford, graduating with a thesis on speech act theory and moral language. He started a university career but switched to science journalism, producing documentaries for German TV. In 1986 he co-founded ChessBase.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

adbennet adbennet 4/6/2020 11:19
Excellent coverage of Gligoric vs Fischer, I learned some things today. This event was before I was born, but as a youngster I did read the back issues of Chess Review which covered it. It's not quite precise to say "Spassky and Keres took almost an hour to find (sic) the same moves", since they could see them on the demo board. What happened was they waited an hour to see how it would turn out. When Geller looked to be winning, Spassky and Keres repeated his moves. Now Najdorf and Pilnik, respectively, had to think how to vary from Panno's example. They chose 13...Kg7 instead of 13...Ne5, but fared no better.
sligunner sligunner 4/6/2020 11:08
Moves of the Cardoso v Bronstein game: 1.e4d62.d4g63.Bc4Bg74.Ne2Nf65.Nbc3Nbd76.f3c67.a4a58.Bb3O-O9.Be3e610.Qd2Rb811.Nd1b612.Nf2Ba613.g4c514.h4h515.Ng3hxg416.fxg4d517.h5c418.Ba2c319.bxc3Qc720.e5Nh721.Nd3g522.h6Bh823.Nh5Rbc824.Rc1Qxc325.Qxc3Rxc326.Bd2Ra327.Bb1Rxa428.c3f629.Ng7Ra130.Nf2Rxb131.Rxb1fxe532.Nxe6Rc833.Rh3exd434.Nxd4Bxd435.cxd4Rc636.Rbb3Kf737.Rbe3Ndf638.Re5Re639.Rxe6Kxe640.Rb3Nd741.Nh3Kf642.Nxg51-0
Jarman Jarman 4/6/2020 10:02
Every time I read an amazing article like this one, I can't help to compare the magic of historical events to the anemia of modern ones. Despite the laudable efforts of several outstanding contemporary writers, today it's very hard to read such compelling stories. Btw, I would have loved to see the fateful game between Bronstein and Cardoso included in the game collection at the end as it impacted the outcome of the Gligoric-Fischer game - it would have surely lasted longer.
twamers twamers 4/6/2020 08:46
Thank you Frederic. A very interesting article about the very great Bobby Fischer - the reason I learnt to play to chess was because of him. What a player! So nice also that the article is about a game against Svetozar Gligoric who was a great player and whose games I have always enjoyed. Thank you.
Philip Feeley Philip Feeley 4/6/2020 06:27
<who doesn't know all the details of the life of the most charismatic and enigmatic player in the history of the game?>

Who knows something about his time between when he played the Polgars in Hungary and when he turned up in Japan - at least a 10-year period of "not much is known"?
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 4/6/2020 02:16
Frederic,
Gligoric DID hear before of Fischer’s novelty – as Fischer told him about it himself! See http://www.chessintranslation.com/2010/06/analysing-by-the-riverside-with-bobby-fischer/: “Imagine my amazement when in the 21st and final round of the Interzonal Tournament in Portoroz I played Fischer and he played the line that he’d shown me by the river! And not just that, he made the same move that I hadn’t considered worthy of my attention! I got a draw with white, but nevertheless I have to admit that in the final position where I had three pawns for a piece Fischer was better.”
It seems 13... Rh7 wasn’t found by Fischer, but by Keres, given by him in the Gothenburg 1955 tournier book, but as I don’t own that, I could not check it.
By the way, the Dutch IM Casper Schoppen won a game against Alina l’Ami with the novelty 14 e5. No proof that’s the refutation, however.
VercoranLeMas VercoranLeMas 4/6/2020 01:37
Enthralling article! Just for the sake of exactitude, the author refers several times to the opponents of the Argentinian team as "Russians" despite the fact that Paul Keres and Efim Geller were, respectively, Estonian and Ukrainian. I am sure that Mr Friedel knows this of course, we all make small mistakes from time to time. Thank you and I will read your future articles with great enthusiasm.
Frederic Frederic 4/6/2020 01:20
Glintvein, cool movie. I will link to it in a future article.
Frederic Frederic 4/6/2020 01:19
I will keep my great admiration for the sporting hero of my youth. He inspired me more than any other sporting figute (except Mohammed Ali and Franz Beckenbauer). I am lauding what he did for chess, how he electrified the game, like no other. Please do not move the discussion into the swamps he was trapped in, during his later years. A swamp that is still out there, still sucking in plenty of people.

BTW there is YABI coming, one that tells about my interaction with Bobby. (Yet Another Big Interview). I never met him, but spoke more than a dozen times by phone with him. Usually half to one hour each time. Amazingly interesting.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 4/6/2020 01:13
sivakumar, I appreciate the genius of your comment, as after reading and rereading several times, I still don't have a clue what you mean to say.
sivakumar R sivakumar R 4/6/2020 12:48
The (not so simple) fact is that if the world (or in particular the US) did not have the tolerance to accept Fischer's great eccentricity, it does not have the moral right to appreciate his great genius either.
Denix Denix 4/6/2020 11:58
Placing second, Bronstein did an amazing job annotating the games between many of the greatest players of the day at the 1953 Zurich International Chess Tournament. It is one of the most famous chess books, a testament of Bronstein's greatness and even one of Karpov's favorites.
dumkof dumkof 4/6/2020 11:12
Fischer was real. No pretentious politeness, no lies, no political a** licking, but just facts. Most of his statements, others may consider as ill or racial, were pure facts. He was just one of the rare courageous persons to say all these publicly. He was a genius, who certainly saw and evaluated things much better and deeper than anyone else.
Glintvein Glintvein 4/6/2020 11:07
Hi, can you estimate my short movie about Fischer:
https://youtu.be/WzdL77VpkaY
Glintvein Glintvein 4/6/2020 11:05
Hi, can you estimate my short moovie
lajosarpad lajosarpad 4/6/2020 10:11
I'm much more interested in Bobby's games and his life than his unfortunate comments.
alphamaster alphamaster 4/6/2020 08:30
Actually in 1968 Fischer invited and played in a tournament in Israel (Netanya). Even in this article, we see that he praised a Russian - Jew, David Bronstain, as "great".
Logos Logos 4/6/2020 06:12
@Justino Pereira

Fischer suffered from bad mental health in his later years - after he became world champion. I do not know of any racist or anti-semitic comments that he made before he became world champion. If you do, please share.
bbrodinsky bbrodinsky 4/6/2020 03:35
Great story. No need to rehash Fischer’s unfortunate mental states off the board every time. Let’s enjoy the wonderful chess he left
SunriseK SunriseK 4/6/2020 02:26
I'm astonished by the rude comments by Justino Pereira and goeland! Really,years later this event, Fischer suffered by racism, anti-semitism and so on, but it was caused by his problems of mental health and even considering all of these facts... he was a much better person than you two, who aren't even able to understand all of this and are so bad without a minimum of human sympathy for an already dead man who was such a great champion! What would be needed according to you to further punish him and be satisfied? To bomb his grave? I would be ashamed if I were you!
John Maccormack John Maccormack 4/6/2020 02:17
Great story. Keep 'em coming. No one ever said Fischer was a great person. Perhaps not even a good one. But he was a unique chess genius. JXM
alphamaster alphamaster 4/6/2020 02:12
He was the greatest. Excellent article.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 4/6/2020 01:17
Fischer had already played the Gothenburg Variation against the same Rodolfo Tan Cardoso in their 1957 match, so I'm not so sure Gligoric was surprised. Maybe he just wanted to find out what Fischer had found.
Cardoso in the 1957 game was not so eager and played 11 0-0-0 instead of Nxe6, but to no avail.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 4/6/2020 12:32
What a tremendously deep analysis of the person Robert Fischer, Justino Pereira. I bet Frederic Friedel will, out of shame, not dare to go out of the door for the next few weeks.
goeland goeland 4/5/2020 10:56
+1 Justino
Justino Pereira Justino Pereira 4/5/2020 09:53
He was a very bad person. Racist, anti-jews, and so on. Been a great chess player isn't enough to celebrate him. Shame on you.
rohuegel rohuegel 4/5/2020 09:40
Really "the most charismatic… player in the history of the game"?! How about Tal, for example? And as for "enigmatic", there is no shortage of there. How about Akiba Rubenstein or Vasil Ivanchuk?
r2r-02020 r2r-02020 4/5/2020 08:58
Love this story! could have been a monumental struggle between Gligoric and Bobby Fischer had not IM Rodolfo Tan Cardoso vanquished the great David Bronstein.
1