Dubov faces criticism in Russia after working for Carlsen

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
12/14/2021 – Soon after defending the World Championship title in Dubai, Magnus Carlsen revealed the team of seconds that helped him keep his crown. Among them was Daniil Dubov, a member of the Russian team. A controversy erupted, with some of Dubov’s compatriots criticizing his decision to work for Ian Nepomniachtchi’s opponent. | Photo: Niki Riga

Your personal chess trainer. Your toughest opponent. Your strongest ally.
FRITZ 20 is more than just a chess engine – it is a training revolution for ambitious players and professionals. Whether you are taking your first steps into the world of serious chess training, or already playing at tournament level, FRITZ 20 will help you train more efficiently, intelligently and individually than ever before. 

Betrayal?

Few countries take as much as pride in the achievements obtained by their athletes as Russia. Following a Soviet-era practice, when the royal game was used as a symbol of intellectual superiority, the Russian government often gets involved (at the very least symbolically) when a representative of the country or the national team participate in international competitions.

Although the times of Soviet supremacy in chess are long gone, Russia continues to be a force to be reckoned with in the sport’s elite. Currently, 11 out of 39 players rated 2700 or above hail from Russia, with China and the United States tying in second place (in terms of number of players) with 5 representatives each. Moreover, at the latest edition of the Candidates Tournament, 3 out of 8 players were Russian — albeit including the organizer’s nominee, Kirill Alekseenko.

However, what the Russians are lacking is the World Championship title. Ever since Garry Kasparov — a vehement opposer of the Putin’s regime — dominated the world of chess and was then succeeded by his compatriot Vladimir Kramnik, Russia has failed to produce a player capable of taking the crown away either from Vishy Anand or Magnus Carlsen. They did get two challengers though: Sergey Karjakin in 2016 and Ian Nepomniachtchi in 2021.

Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin at the training camp of the Olympiad Russian teams in Sochi (2018)

While Nepo is not one to often voice his political opinions — or talk much about his private life in general — Karjakin openly showed his nationalistic pride during his preparations to face Carlsen five years ago. Thus, it was not very surprising to see him being the first one to question on social media the fact that a member of the Russian team had worked for Carlsen’s team as a second.

Karjakin was referring to Daniil Dubov. Right after the match, Peter Heine Nielsen, the world champion’s top aide, shared on Twitter the names of the players who had helped Carlsen prepare for the match in Dubai. None of the names was particularly surprising — not even Dubov’s, since it is a well-known fact that he had worked with the Norwegian in the past.

Daniil Dubov, Magnus Carlsen

Daniil Dubov right after winning the 2018 World Rapid Championship — the Russian finished ahead of Magnus Carlsen, shortly after helping the Norwegian defend his classical title against Fabiano Caruana in London | Photo: Maria Emelianova

The controversy was not obvious for non-Russians, although after seeing Karjakin’s tweet and given the factors mentioned above, it is not difficult to put two and two together, and note that Dubov most likely had to consider this aspect when deciding to work for Carlsen this time around. The 25-year-old clarified to Grigory Telingater for championat.ru (see an English translation of the interview by Colin McGourty here):

GT: And when did you start [working for the match in Dubai]?

DD: Before the start of the Candidates. I was asked what I thought about the idea of helping. I replied that it would be normal. That’s perhaps the first thing I’d like to point out about the rather strange criticism. In normal teams all the agreements are formulated in advance. 

You don’t have to wait for who wins the Candidates in order to start preparing.

The ever-confident Dubov was aware of the potential backlash once his compatriot became the challenger, though. His stance on the subject is clear, nevertheless, and is based on the fact that the match for the World Championship title is an individual competition, not a contest between national teams:

GT: When Ian won the Candidates Tournament, did you think that hate would come your way because of your cooperation with Magnus?

DD: That someone might not like it is nothing new. It’s not the first time I’ve encountered this and I’m relatively calm about it. For me there’s no issue. I think it’s the same for Ian. When people talk about the state or the Russia team, then that’s precisely the Russian team. Here, after all, it’s not Russia versus Norway.

Daniil Dubov

At Magnus Carlsen’s training camp

In the same outlet, championat.ru, Vishy Anand was asked about the whole controversy, with the Indian making a useful analogy:

We live in a globalized world, where people calmly work for foreign companies, move to other countries, take foreign players into their football teams and even support football clubs from other countries.

Dubov shared a similar sentiment, and even went as far as noting that his involvement in Carlsen’s team could be presented as a worthy achievement by a member of the Russian national team:

In general you could logically look at all this differently. From the point of view of the Russian team: one of the best Russian chess players, relatively young, has worked with the best chess player in history — he’s gained experience that will help him in his career.


Magnus Carlsen presents his team

Dubov: I think it’s kind of important for him to actually like the guys. For instance, the Russian team it’s exactly the opposite — they would normally bring all the biggest guns in, it’s basically you just use all the power. Here it’s a European approach — mostly you care about some atmosphere and so on, and only then you need people to work well.


There is talk about Dubov being banned from the Russian team after this ‘incident’. Not getting to see such a creative player in team events will surely be a huge loss for the chess community worldwide. Therefore, let us hope this issue is solved by different means, or that it be simply left alone.

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

KevinConnor KevinConnor 12/14/2021 05:49
There it is, Russian nationalism. Something the (chess)world can do without.
lagrigorescu lagrigorescu 12/14/2021 05:44
The whole story shows again the great character of Carlsen, who trusted Dubov to be in his team despite Daniil's background and circumstances. Given the fact Dubov worked in his team before, it would have been a betrayal for him to switch sides to helping Nepo with "insider information". We do not know - and from available info we can assume - that Daniil and Nepo are close to each other either, so not a betrayal of Nepo as well. As for betraying Russia, I do not think that's the case either (others may see it differently), as these matches are more about the individual than the country (we can not conclude that due to this match Norway is better than Russia).
oxygenes oxygenes 12/14/2021 05:37
@arzi
Not, i think, that trolling started ArgueiroNegro, his twice wrong comment. Cold war is here again, this accept even our russophobian news media. If compare Crimea to Kosovo, in Crimea was referendum, in which crimean citisens voluntarily agreed join to Rossia. Crimea was under Osman empire rules before, so rest is just Awkuz personal oppinion, even as Negro comment is.
Somewhat Experienced Somewhat Experienced 12/14/2021 05:20
Nationalism is the religion of inferiority complexes...
malfa malfa 12/14/2021 05:05
Some days after I initially read of this nonsense on a different chess website, I see no reason to change my original reaction to it: it's not the first time that GM Karjakin, when shouting his opinions to the world, looks to me like a sort of idiot savant, one who, outside of his highly professional field, is as authoritative as a complete imbecile. Apart from this, the overall affair just looks like a matter of wounded national pride by sore losers.
Cajunmaster Cajunmaster 12/14/2021 04:54
Remember when it was considered ungentlemanly to analyse, alone (!), one's own adjourned game?

It has been downhill ever since!
BabyBoy751 BabyBoy751 12/14/2021 04:37
Best Chess player in History? Every time and then you find a writer, chess lover or a Journalist with a lack of chess knowledge or driven by the emotion of the moment (writing symbolism). I'm have followed Carlsen since he was 13 years old and he is my favourite player since then, every time he plays is so enjoyable, but the best chess player in history, MMM, Kasparov, Fisher, Capablanca might have a saying on this.
arzi arzi 12/14/2021 04:01
I think @Awkuz is just a troll because nobody can be so stupid.

Troll: person who provokes others for their own personal amusement or to cause disruption.
stumpy stumpy 12/14/2021 03:59
I think Karjakin should be asking himself - 'Did Carlsen win the match or did Nepo loose the match?' I think Nepo lost because of his poor selection of moves not anything Carlsen or anyone else did. Nepo had a strong position in game 6 and many thought he should win, the others were down to unforced blunders that any 2000 rated player should see.
arzi arzi 12/14/2021 03:50
Translation: @AWKUZ "What a stupid reaction."

Thanks, @AWKUZ, I appreciate your opinion. :)
agatti agatti 12/14/2021 03:46
Awkuz: while this whole forum is in English, you don't make a step towards taking the time to translate your text into English.

This already tells quite some things to the people here.

I'll do it for you:

"Crimea has always been Russian, and Putin is the best president in the world. Dubov turned out to be a narrow-minded, selfish person. I would not go on reconnaissance with Dubov."
KjarHS KjarHS 12/14/2021 03:44
Stupidity in its purest form.
Kenulphus Kenulphus 12/14/2021 03:31
@AWKUZ
Какая глупая реакция.
arzi arzi 12/14/2021 03:31
Translation: "Crimea has always been Russian, and Putin is the best president in the world. Dubov turned out to be a narrow-minded, selfish person. I would not go on reconnaissance with Dubov."
Hah, what a nice fairytail! What can we learn about this? Do not ever hire any manager from Russia for your talent in any sport because the manager will be in trouble in that day when your talent is competing against Russian player/athlete. I am really sorry for the great and young player, Dubov.
calvinamari calvinamari 12/14/2021 03:18
Sam Shankland helped Magnus twice before, including in the match against Fabi. Nobody thought that was a sign of some great tear in the chess matrix. Other than being smothered in thick fondue of Russian hyper-nationalism, it isn’t. Btw, Karjakin, also suggested that Magnus’s win in game nine may be illegitimate because he adjusted a piece on the board. All this commentary and dissent from Russia merges into one thing — dysentery.
AWKUZ AWKUZ 12/14/2021 02:45
Крым - всегда был Российским, а Путин - лучший президент в мире. Дубов же оказался недалёким, корыстным человеком. С Дубовым я бы в разведку не пошел.
Denix Denix 12/14/2021 02:34
Dubov's main assignment in Team Carlsen should have been the training for tiebreaks. Although it's not useless, it was not even used in this match. Banning Dubov from the National Team will not give any positive contribution.
ArqueiroNegro ArqueiroNegro 12/14/2021 02:03
Someone please tell Karjakin the Cold War is over. Besides, he's got some nerve pointing fingers at Dubov when he himself not only switched from Ukraine to Russia, but also supports the illegal Russian annexation of Crimea.
fixpont fixpont 12/14/2021 02:00
this is beyond stupid