Daniel Gormally’s take on lockdown life

by Daniel Gormally
8/2/2020 – Near the end of March, the world came to a halt — even FIDE had to cancel the second half of the Candidates Tournament, the last sporting event taking place amid the corona crisis. It’s been four months and the chess world has almost turned completely to online events. Great conditions have been given to those at the very top of the rating ladder, but how has this impacted the rest of chess professionals? Daniel Gormally sent us his take in his usual painfully honest, self-deprecating style. | Photo: John Upham / British Chess News

ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2020 with 8 million games and more than 80,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!


Endless chess, online

The other day I was sent an email from somebody at ChessBase asking if I’d like to give a “non-elite GM’s take” on life in the post-corona world. I thought that was a polite way of saying “weak GM” and I was tempted to reply, in my own mind I am an elite GM. But I doubt anyone would care.

It might be stretching the truth to say that I predicted the coming of Covid, but about 18 months ago I had a very strange dream. In the dream an evil virus ravaged mankind, killing millions, and bodies lined the streets. There was a goat (the devil?) walking through a laboratory and red lights were flashing. Eventually the goat ended up on a street corner, staring at me. This had such a powerful effect on me that I told a friend about it, because I’d never had a dream about a virus before, but then forgot about the whole thing until recently. Until all this madness, of a changed world, people dying alone on ventilators. Mask wearing and suspicious stares every time you visit a shop. At least I could be smug and say, well I foresaw all of this.

Daniel GormallyWhen the virus first revealed its potency and lockdown was imposed, I, like many others, was very anxious. I became even more fat because the gyms were closed and I didn’t leave the house. Eventually I forced myself to take lengthy walks and it greatly helped my state of mind as well as helping me to lose some weight. Sun-drenched afternoons, baking my skin in ultra-violet rays, with always the sense that you could disappear down a leafy path, invoking the sounds and smells of times long forgotten, and you’d be back in childhood. And all this would be all forgotten, it had been a dream all along, and you were back in a happier time when concerns about money and health were somewhere in the distance.

Part of the anxiety that I felt at the start was because I was confronted with what I was going to do with my life. My existence before had been the slightly unhappy one of the chess bum, but at least a chess bum who occasionally went away to chess tournaments. Not anymore. If I couldn’t play chess tournaments, then what was I? An internet chess bum? A coaching chess bum? I was forced to face up to the poverty of my existence, and like so many others I retreated into social media, gladly exchanging wild conspiracy theories with my equally bored friends.

I think if this coronavirus crisis has taught us anything, then it’s that we’re all the same. Not only can any of us die, but the illusion that some of us have superior lives has been shattered. Film star? Not anymore. Now at best, you’re a Tiktok creator. Singer? Now you do Zoom concerts. We’re all stuck at home, bored, bored, bored, none of us having any idea when things will be totally back to normal again. As I said on Facebook when the lockdown was first announced, we’ve been given the news that we're supposed to sit around at home and do nothing for the next few months. Well, I’ve been preparing for this for 44 years.

One thing I could do was play online, and at first I threw myself into this exciting, unfolding world of endless internet chess tournaments. It wasn’t long before I was dismantled by my first cheat. If online chess had exploded in popularity during the lockdown, then online cheating was just as popular, and it seemed as if everyone was at it. Seasoned pros, happy to flush their hard-earned reputations down the toilet. And particularly juniors, who were no doubt bored out of their tiny skulls and unused to doing so little, were acting out in a big way. Sites like Lichess and chess.com had to close endless accounts, and there were new ones opening up all the time, because lockdown has accelerated the pace of internet chess growth exponentially.

Internet chess is also worryingly addictive. Take today, for example. Using my account Carobee (like so many of my online chess accounts, named after a racehorse) I logged in at 6 am, intending to only play for an hour. However, when I went from 2615 to 2613, I “tilted”, and keen to actually gain points on the session, ended up playing for five hours. The sum product of this session? Seven points gained and the sense of time completely wasted. Here is one of those games.


Games like the previous example are quite likely to induce furious meltdowns, involving mishandled pillows and screamed profanities. Such is the mental torment inflicted by internet chess, that I’ve ended up closing more chess accounts than Magnus Carlsen has won online tournaments. In fact because now I play with an account that doesn’t use a title (to get a verified account there are several hoops to jump through) often my opponents will abort the game before it has even begun, sure that they are facing a computer cheater.

TorquayOf course an online blitz addiction is probably a more healthy addiction than some of my other ones, like watching Supergirl and betting on choking golfers. I have no idea when I will play again, and however bad things got in my life, at least I had tournaments like the British to go away to, every summer. I’d be there now in glorious Torquay [pictured] if this hadn’t happened. When will the next event in England be? I have a good idea that events like the London Classic and Hastings will eventually be cancelled. It’s a sad state of affairs, and I doubt I'm the only professional chess player who is questioning their chosen vocation.

But of course, put it into perspective. People are dying and I'm complaining about not being able to play chess. The lack of tournaments has also seen more possibilities open up on the coaching front. A new site, Cochess, linking chess students with potential coaches, has taken advantage of this gap in the market, although a brief perusal of the website seems to suggest it has something of an Instagram or Tinder feel to it. Matching up hot WFMs with horny virgin males, their bank accounts overflowing due to the lockdown giving them nothing to spend it on. All concerted efforts to take a more professional approach to my life, seem to be quickly ended when sites like Lichess come calling. The game against the Krygyzstani IM Markov was typical of the crash-bang wallop nature of blitz.


If you play for too long, then there is a good chance that after a certain point your chess will start to look utterly abysmal. In this position it looks as if White might be better because of the far-advanced pawn on e6, but matters are not so clear, because Black has some ideas of taking on g3. My response to these threats was not what was needed.


To replace the loss of classical chess, some of the leagues have moved online, for example the 4NCL had quite a popular online turnout and already plan to get season two started in August. Personally, I’m not sure about this development — I think we should reject this moving of everything online, because then people won't have the courage to organise chess tournaments over the board. I also found it very difficult to focus and take completely seriously when playing these classical online games. I’d get bored and start watching the TV, when waiting for the opponent to move.

If online chess can also be boring, then I wish I could also say that the lockdown has enabled me to spend a great deal of time studying chess, honing my opening repertoire to unbreakable proportions — unfortunately that has not been the case. If I was lazy before, coronavirus won't change that. And what is the motivation to study chess now? So you can play a little bit better online?

Something which has been a useful product of recent times, and is a useful educational tool for lazy people like me, has been the rise of banter blitz. Can you imagine forty of fifty years ago, players like Fischer or Karpov giving their thoughts on their games so openly? It’s something that I think is unique to these times, and is tremendously informative. To advertise the ‘chess24 Legends of Chess’ tournament, players like Caruana streamed some of their online encounters.


Caruana, despite having a reputation as not being that formidable at blitz, was ferocious in his stream, winning all of his games and displaying awesome feats of calculation.

In general, this is keeping with all the elite younger players — they are all fiercely ambitious and have very high online ratings. When watching the streams of players like Kramnik, Anand and Ivanchuk, while they were impressive you could also detect understandable rust. It’s also rather endearing how little regard they seem to have for the clock, and there isn't the obsession with flagging people that you get from other streamers. In fact, quite the opposite often happens — as they become so focused on the clock, they end up losing on time to much lower-rated players. I get the impression that the legends couldn’t care less what their online blitz ratings are.


Navigating the Ruy Lopez Vol.1-3

The Ruy Lopez is one of the oldest openings which continues to enjoy high popularity from club level to the absolute world top. In this video series, American super GM Fabiano Caruana, talking to IM Oliver Reeh, presents a complete repertoire for White.


Daniel is an English grandmaster with a FIDE rating of 2498 and a peak Elo of 2573. He became a Grandmaster in 2005, and played for England in Olympiad and European Championships. Author of Play Chess Like the Pros, Calculate Like a Grandmaster, Mating the Castled King and A Year in the Chess World, Gormally is also an established chess coach at St Mary’s School in Alnwick, England, where he lives.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register

fgkdjlkag fgkdjlkag 8/7/2020 09:57
I don't know if lichess has changed the policy, but it used to be that there were circumstances in which it was allowed to create another account, and it was confirmed on the forums. There had to be a "legitimate reason" for the secondary account.

Much of this article doesn't make sense. Why study chess for a few extra online rating points? Does the author think there will never be OTB tournaments again?

Obviously the author should give up online blitz and stop caring about his online rating, because they are not serving him. Easier said than done, but that is the obstacle between him and productive activity, not covid-19.

In the first game he is meaning to get around to looking at 8... d5, but doesn't have the time. That's the point of chess960, I wonder what his opinion of it is?

Insulting for the chessbase editor to ask for the perspective of a "non-elite GM". I suspect I might know who it is based on previous chessbase articles...
herr_doktor herr_doktor 8/5/2020 02:37
Curious why Danny, as a self-confessed 'Burger-King GM' would object to the e-mail from Chessbase. In any case, every very strong player will sympathise with the anguish shown in Danny's books, twitter feed and facebook page when, for example (sorry Danny), he loses to a French 1900 player, exposes online engine cheats or draws with a Scottish 1800 player. If the number of comments is any indication of how close to the reader's heart the articles are, then these by Danny are some of the finest ever published by Chessbase.
EEShelton EEShelton 8/5/2020 01:12
Another great article from Danny. I've enjoyed reading his articles and books, as well as working with him to improve my play. He is truly a "working man's GM" - he understands the game at a high level, but can help even a duffer like myself. He can even relate to the struggles of a weaker player, and that gives him great insight into how to help that player improve.
lajosarpad lajosarpad 8/5/2020 12:38
@e-mars you mix up rules with rule enforcement. Yes, it's very difficult to enforce rules in some cases, but that does not mean that the rules should not be respected. For example, it's pretty obvious that farting in the opera house is not welcome, but you cannot prevent people from doing so and in most cases it's virtually impossible to identify the "perpetrator". Even though it's virtually impossible to enforce the rule, nobody likes to smell a fart while watching the opera.
brabo_hf brabo_hf 8/5/2020 06:50
How in earth can you know somebody is not cheating online? This is the same type of question and we all know the answer.
Anyway my point is that I find it strange to admit publicly under your own real name that you did something which is forbidden by the rules. I am sure many players copy the behavior of grandmasters and if they don't care about rules then why would lesser mortals need to do.
e-mars e-mars 8/4/2020 12:46
@brabo_hf Now tell me how on earth you can verify a user only by their email since you can have multiple emails. It's impossible unless you do ask for PII which is not something any website would do light-hearted.
brabo_hf brabo_hf 8/4/2020 08:18
"I know many titled chessplayers on lichess who have multiple accounts. As long as the owner of account is verified by lichess, it is fine."
Then explain me why lichess asks at registration to clearly affirm by clicking a button below statement:
"I agree that I will not make multiple accounts".
Also I question that users are verifying multiple of their accounts. Most likely they only do maximum once as lichess should normally have a mechanism in place which detects that a verification of the same person already happened for another account.

You could of course argue what is wrong with having multiple accounts. Well for first the owner of the site defines the rules and not the players so in principal as a player you can't make any claims. Also I see some players using their multiple accounts to throw games. This can be for inflating/ deflating a rating but also to manipulate the standings in a tournament. Such actions damage the reputation of the site.
daftarche daftarche 8/3/2020 09:39
I know many titled chessplayers on lichess who have multiple accounts. As long as the owner of account is verified by lichess, it is fine.
brabo_hf brabo_hf 8/3/2020 01:10
"like so many of my online chess accounts, named after a racehorse"
Most sites have a strict policy which forbid having multiple accounts. This is definitely the case for lichess as you use which is clearly mentioned when you register.
"One possibility is to require that rated online chess be played by identifiable, real people providing a verified federation ID number."
Most titled players don't want thousands of their games registered as you risk that this information will be used against them in otb. I also mentioned this in one of my most recent articles see https://chess-brabo.blogspot.com/2020/07/clubchess-andor-internetchess-part-2.html
lajosarpad lajosarpad 8/3/2020 12:27
@Aighearach I'm not a native English speaker, as a matter of fact, English is my third language, but I agree that this is a self-deprecating style. He says that in his own mind he is an elite GM. He does not say that his elite GM-ness is a fact. Quite the contrary, he describes this as being a reality in his life, not necessarily in conformity with objective reality, which is a tone of self-irony. He calls himself a former chess bum and due to the fact that he has no opportunity to travel to tournaments these days, satirically searches for the correct self-deprecating term.
goeland goeland 8/3/2020 09:11
Great guy, with hypersensibility. I had the pleasure to face him twice in Isle of Man long time ago. He's not an elite GM but an elite dude with an ability to judge, not judge, go thru situations and people. I dont understand why he does not complete his chess with some academics like sociology or anthropology. His analysis and books would be great.
geeker geeker 8/3/2020 02:13
Agreed on banter blitz. I love to watch top GMs playing b.b.
ChessSpawn49 ChessSpawn49 8/2/2020 11:32
One possibility is to require that rated online chess be played by identifiable, real people providing a verified federation ID number.
anandymous anandymous 8/2/2020 10:43
I'm ready to purchase his next book. He just needs to write it.
tgavaga tgavaga 8/2/2020 08:46
Entertaining read and a candid look into Gormally's thoughts on the current situation in Chess.
Aighearach Aighearach 8/2/2020 08:02
When you describe an author as having a "self-deprecating style," but then in the first paragraph the author admits that in their own mind they're an elite, you're accidentally insulting them. This is not the best role for an editor to take on. It is better to give compliments that are accurate. I assume this is due to the editor not being a native English speaker, but maybe look up superlatives before using them, to see if they describe the work?

Self-deprecating means the opposite. Which is not bad, mind you! There is no problem with the article at all. But it is written in a comically-arrogant style, which is nothing even vaguely close to self-deprecating.

The article is great, why the awful intro?
daftarche daftarche 8/2/2020 06:06
He says it as it is with no censorship and I enjoy these articles and commentaries.
Sarangi53 Sarangi53 8/2/2020 05:50
I appreciate Danny's writing very much. He is incredibly sincere and writes very well. Should look forward to abook on the life of a professional GM. Sometimes a bit pessimistic but never too much too loose some irony, and the chess is top grade, thank Danny Gormally!!