Michael Adams repeats as British Champion

by Daniel Gormally
8/9/2019 – Wrapping up the the 2019 British Championship, GM DANIEL GORMALLY sends his final thoughts, including annotations of the key last round games, and musings on why draw offers should be banned. GM Michael Adams won his seventh British Champion title, undefeated with 7½/9, a half point clear of David Howell. Jovanka Houska was the best female player and thus won her record ninth British Women's Champion title. | Photo: John Upham

A Sicilian Stunner - The Kalashnikov A Sicilian Stunner - The Kalashnikov

This increasingly popular opening is easy to pick up as the Black pieces can usually be developed quickly and smoothly. Many of the ideas are thematic and Black can achieve attacking positions in several of the variations.

More...

Is Adams the best British player of all time?

While doing the British championship commentary during one of the earlier rounds, after the game Gary Lane vs Justin Tan had finished abruptly I suggested that the draw offer in chess is a very artificial concept. It seemed to me that this game was entering a very interesting stage, with plenty of play left, and ending at that point just looked rather strange when you looked at it more deeply.

I made the point then (and make the point now) that imagine if a tennis match between say Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer was agreed drawn, as neither of the players felt the need to continue. There would be a near riot in the stands. And yet in chess, we seem to have accepted this. I would be interested to know where the draw offer in chess originates from. Are any keen readers able to point out exactly when the draw offer came into being? And what prompted it?

Time-lapse video of the playing hall

The reason I mention all this is that in the final round of the British chess championships held in Torquay, IM Richard Palliser agreed to a draw when he still had a theoretical chance of winning the tournament.

 

The final position has been played at least half a dozen times before

To win the championship, Palliser would have had to win that game, hope that Stephen Gordon got a result against Adams, and then win the playoff. A tall order, to be sure, so perhaps it was understandable that he should want to curtail the game at that moment, to wrap up a good tournament and bag a decent prize. But others might argue that if he had any chance of becoming British Champion, and there was still plenty of play left in the position, then why agree a draw? It seemed to me that the fact that the draw offer exists at all harmed Palliser at that moment. And it’s not like I’m just picking on him. I have had plenty of such moments myself, like when I agreed a draw at the recent Scottish Championship in the last round, thus ending my hopes of winning the tournament. In my view the sooner the draw offer is done away with in chess the better, and then people would be forced to fight in any position.

Jovanka Houska

Jovanka Houska secured the British Women's Championship title | Photo: John Upham

One player who was presumably happy with Palliser’s draw offer was his opponent Jovanka Houska, who gladly accepted as she only needed a draw to win the Women’s Championship for the ninth time — a record.

“Jovie” as she is affectionately known, is a popular figure and is by far the strongest female player to regularly take part in the championship. It is up to the younger generation to emerge from the pack and challenge her, although it is somewhat worrying that out of the top 100 under 18s on the English grading list, the only female player listed is Cassie Graham. More needs to be done to encourage girls to continue with chess beyond their younger years.

In any case Richard was right, Stephen Gordon did not get a result, and Michael Adams reigned supreme in the British championships once again, for a remarkable seventh time. I think there is little argument now, if there ever was, that Adams is the strongest English chess player of all time. In the last two rounds he played near faultless chess.

 

IM Lawrence Trent reviewed this and other British Champs highlights in The Weekly Show

Gordon

GM Stephen Gordon took a shot in the last round, but became Adams' sixth victim | Photo: John Upham

Adams nearly perfect

Without descending into hero worship, what makes Adams so strong? Impressive analytical skills, cold-eyed objectivity and experience of playing in world-class tournaments are just some of the factors. But what perhaps stands out most of all is the consistency, with which Adams approaches a game of chess. Observing him from afar, it seems most of his mannerisms remains constant during play, he seems incredibly relaxed, and seldom does he leave the board. It’s this consistency that has enabled him to build a body of work over the last twenty years that other English players can only aspire to.


Rd. Bo. SNo   Name RtgI FED Club/City Pts. Res.
1 2 29 IM Rudd Jack 2275 ENG Barnstaple 4,5 s 1
2 2 19 IM Pigott John C 2384 ENG Little Heath 4,0 w 1
3 1 23 FM Ashton Adam G 2323 ENG 3cs 5,0 w 1
4 1 10 IM Haria Ravi 2430 ENG Wood Green 4ncl 6,5 s ½
5 2 17 IM Palliser Richard Jd 2399 ENG Eagle & Child 6,5 w 1
6 1 5 GM Tan Justin Hy 2513 AUS None 6,0 s ½
7 1 1 GM Howell David Wl 2697 ENG None 7,0 s ½
8 2 11 IM Pert Richard G 2430 ENG Brentwood 5,0 w 1
9 1 4 GM Gordon Stephen J 2516 ENG None 6,0 w 1

Here's how Adams' tournament shaped up



Adams before Torquay

Adams didn't play any tournaments in the months leading up to the British Championship, preferring to take a break and prepare. I caught up with him at a special event in London — a simul against secondary school students in downtown London at the Old Bailey courthouse. It was a beautiful and unusual venue for a chess event. Check out the video below which includes an interview with Mickey. — Macauley Peterson

The top board was 1700-rated Jason Covey, who essayed the French Defence. GM Nick Pert annotated the game:

 

GM Nick Pert who organized the simul for the King Edward's School, interviewed the players



David Howell finished alone in second place and, although I’m sure he wanted more, he was also impressive. It’s not just about winning tournaments and if you can continually finish up there, that shows something else — consistency. Perhaps that’s the holy grail that competitors really desire; the ability to keep producing a level of performance in line with their own expectations.

Howell

Howell finished 2nd, a half point behind Adams | Photo: John Upham

White against Keith Arkell in the last round turned into another weary battle of attrition for both players. I’ve known Keith for many years, and I know that he feels somewhat undervalued as a chess player, that somehow his efforts have been overlooked by the chess media at large. In defeat, he was probably more impressive than in his preceding wins in the rounds leading up to this one.

 

Howell

Keith Arkell finished tied for 8th place with 5½ points | Photo: John Upham

After the last game had finished, I challenged Keith to a game of golf. Sadly, my ability to access a back-right pin position to an elevated green with a soft draw, proved hopeless against Keith, who merely putted everything off the tee. I sympathised with him that 5½ points was unable to win a prize. Playing chess for money can be tough at times, and another one who came up short was John Emms, despite a brave effort against Ravi Haria.

 

Palliser and Haria

Palliser and Haria tied for 3rd with 6½ points | Photo: John Upham


Final standings (top 25)

Rk. Name Pts.
1 Adams Michael 7,5
2 Howell David Wl 7,0
3 Haria Ravi 6,5
  Palliser Richard Jd 6,5
5 Gordon Stephen J 6,0
  Tan Justin Hy 6,0
  Houska Jovanka 6,0
8 Emms John M 5,5
  Arkell Keith C 5,5
  Wadsworth Matthew J 5,5
  Eggleston David J 5,5
  Willow Jonah B 5,5
  Bradbury Neil H 5,5
  Derakhshani Borna 5,5
  Storey Charles H 5,5
16 Williams Simon K 5,0
  Pert Richard G 5,0
  Ward Chris G 5,0
  Ashton Adam G 5,0
  Claridge-Hansen William 5,0
21 Fernandez Daniel H 4,5
  Lane Gary W 4,5
  Bates Richard A 4,5
  Pein Malcolm 4,5
  Rudd Jack 4,5

Once the tournament was over it was traditional for some of the players to wind down with a few drinks. Back in the day, it used to be that Applebys bar was the place where everyone would hang out during the tournament although, as the grandmasters have begun to approach their twilight years, the thought of dragging our increasingly infirm bodies up even the small hill that approaches that particular establishment has proved less enticing, so more convenient venues have been found. But sentimentality kicked in and the inspiring views across the bay provided by that bar once again drew a strong chess crowd. The evening finished for me playing blitz chess for money in the beer garden outside, probably because like most chess players my social skills are unable to tolerate merely sitting there and having a conversation with a friend. As the British has visited Torquay so often, I’m sure it’s a question of when, not if, we’ll be back there soon.

All games

 

Links




Daniel is an English grandmaster with a FIDE rating of 2498 and a peak Elo of 2573. He became a Grandmaster in 2005, and played for England in Olympiad and European Championships. Author of Play Chess Like the Pros, Calculate Like a Grandmaster, Mating the Castled King and A Year in the Chess World, Gormally is also an established chess coach at St Mary’s School in Alnwick, England, where he lives.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Keith Arkell Keith Arkell 8/11/2019 12:56
A good piece by Danny, who always writes freely and honestly about his thoughts and perceptions.

In fairness though I'd say this ' I’ve known Keith for many years, and I know that he feels somewhat undervalued as a chess player, that somehow his efforts have been overlooked by the chess media at large' was maybe the case 15 to 20 years ago but certainly isn't today.

And, incidentally, here I was more than happy to arrive on board two to play my friend and team-mate David Howell for the last round of a Swiss System event during which I had to default round 4 through illness.

P.S. I wasn't only putting off the tees, I was also putting out of bunkers, so it's nuts give Danny 20 shots next time - not over just 9 holes...but I guess I'm going to have to!
CMPonCB CMPonCB 8/9/2019 09:27
A really nice and fairly unique video presentation. My thanks to GM Nick Pert and all who contributed to it.
KevinC KevinC 8/9/2019 03:32
@Leavenfish, I agree there is no draw problem, in general, but when people don't play at all and agree to a short draw, that is a problem.
Leavenfish Leavenfish 8/9/2019 02:54
People who claim we need to 'fix the draw problem' in chess....always seem to miss all these tournaments where so much blood is drawn. <sigh>
thirteen thirteen 8/9/2019 02:20
I agree that Mr Gormally should write more chess bits, as they are fun to read in obviously an informative way. Congratulations to GM Adams as well as 'Jovie' for their amazing consistencies. Additionally it was really great to see GM Nick Pert there, with his microphone presented individually towards those taking part.
KevinC KevinC 8/9/2019 01:55
[Event "NE Cup (4)"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1992.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Cotreau"]
[Black "Dean, Lawrence"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D11"]
[WhiteElo "2200"]
[BlackElo "2085"]
[PlyCount "55"]
[EventDate "1992.??.??"]

1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 {I knew my opponent plays the Q-Gambit Accepted, so I thought
playing the Catalan would disturb him.} Nf6 3. g3 Bf5 4. Bg2 e6 5. O-O h6 6. c4
c6 7. Qb3 $6 {A faulty plan.} (7. b3 $142) 7... Qb6 8. Qxb6 axb6 9. b3 $2 {
/\a4,Ba3+/=} Bxb1 {He offered a draw, since he would win the tournament, $150.
00, and a large trophy, which now sits in my living room.} 10. Rxb1 {Played
after 6 minutes thought, I decided it was only rating points.} Rxa2 11. Bf4 $32
Nbd7 12. Ra1 Ra6 $2 (12... Rxe2 13. Ra8+ Ke7 $17 {He was afraid of ghosts.})
13. Ne5 {/\Ra6+/-. If white wins back the P, between the lead in development,
and B pair, it would be easy.} Nxe5 14. Bxe5 Be7 15. Rxa6 bxa6 16. Ra1 a5 17.
c5 bxc5 18. dxc5 Bxc5 19. Rxa5 Be7 20. Ra7 $1 {/\Bd6! Keeping the K in the
center.} Bd8 21. Bd6 Nd7 22. e4 $1 {Opening the position for the Bs.} Nb6 23.
Bc5 Nc8 24. Rb7 Rg8 {At first I couldn't understand this, but he wants to play
Be7 when the Rg8 would be protected by the Ne7.} 25. exd5 cxd5 (25... exd5 26.
Bh3 f5 (26... Ne7 27. Bd7+ Kf8 28. Rb8 $18) 27. Bxf5 Ne7 (27... Be7 28. Bxe7
Nxe7 29. Be6 $18) 28. Bd7+ Kf7 29. Bxc6 $18) 26. Bf1 Ne7 (26... Be7 27. Bb5+
Kd8 (27... Kf8 28. Bxe7+ $18) 28. Rd7+ Ke8 29. Rxd5+ Kf8 30. Rd8#) 27. Bb5+ Kf8
28. Bxe7+ 1-0
KevinC KevinC 8/9/2019 01:55
While I am a NM, I have never cared about money in a tournament. I have only cared about results, so I never have understood taking a draw when you can win it all.

Once, in the last round of a small tournament, I was white versus a guy, who was .5 in front of me. On top of it all, I blundered a pawn on move 9, and he offered a draw knowing he would win the tournament and the trophy. I saw a chance, and I took it. I won one of my favorite games ever in just 28 moves. Here is the PGN with my notes.
TheBlueGhost TheBlueGhost 8/9/2019 10:49
I refer the interested reader to Adams own webpage and his list of achievements. The guy was a winning machine....
Escargot Escargot 8/9/2019 04:23
I agree with anandymous.
anandymous anandymous 8/9/2019 02:56
Gormally needs to write much, much more. Like Yermo and Hort, he's always very entertaining while being somewhat instructive, as well.
1