CBM 202: Nepo wins, Caruana shines and a Timman special

by Nagesh Havanur
8/27/2021 – ChessBase Magazine offers a window to the world of professional chess, and it also provides arsenal for the tournament player. This issue offers 456 games from 3 major events, Candidates’ Tournament, New in Chess Classic and the Russian Team Championship. It also includes games annotated by Ian Nepomniachtchi, Boris Gelfand and Anish Giri, to mention a few. The icing on the cake is a tribute to Timman who turned 70 this year, with 25 annotated games. Prof. Nagesh Havanur takes a look. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

ChessBase Magazine 202 ChessBase Magazine 202

Special: Jan Timman turns 70! Candidate Tournament 2020/2021 with analyses by Nepomniachtchi, Giri and others. Opening video by Kasimdzhanov, King and Marin. 11 opening articles with new repertoire ideas. Train tactics, strategy and endgame with our exper

More...

Three months away from the world title match

Chessbase MagazineEven as I write these lines, I read the announcement that Carsen would be playing in the Aimchess US Rapid, commencing on August 28.

Of course, he knows he will be playing the world championship match with Nepomniachtchi soon and only 90 days are left. Obviously, he believes the best preparation for the duel is practice with his peers in tournament arena. Recently he had done just that and participated in the World Cup only to be eliminated in the semi-final by Duda, who went on to win the precious title. The challenger on the other hand has waited in the wings and watched his rival’s play. He knows, a world championship match is different from a tournament, however high its category and rating may be.

In this issue of ChessBase Magazine, readers would find all the games from the Candidates’ Tournament. Nepomniachtchi annotates his own game with Wang Hao.

If we set aside his aggressive performance against Alekseenko, Nepomniachtchi played pragmatic chess and his survival skills paid off in the end (see his interview below).
I was more impressed by his game with Ding Liren in the first half, which is also included in this issue.

In creative terms, the Game of the Tournament was the Caruana vs Vachier-Lagrave encounter. In this issue, it is annotated by Romain Edouard. When I studied the game, I checked his analysis and those of other experts. I also found some recent developments related to the opening of this game. Now discerning readers know that this particular line, the Poisoned Pawn Variation, has a chequered history. Back in the 1950s, Keres and Tal upheld the line for White; subsequently, Tolush and Fischer did it for Black. If one has to appreciate this game, it helps to know how the whole line has evolved. Here I have kept the annotations relatively simple for readers not familiar with theory. The final phase of the game receives detailed treatment by Karsten Müller in this issue. Worth a look.

Before we look at the game, I have a suggestion for young players. First, study the game without GM annotations and engine analysis. Then you see it with the commentary here and ChessBase Magazine. You will find a wealth of variations.

 

Note that the first game in the list does not include annotations; the second one does

Fabiano Caruana, Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Fabiano Caruana facing Maxime Vachier-Lagrave | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

Magnus is at last happy!

The second tournament report is on the New in Chess Classic 2021, won by Carlsen. He hadn’t won a proper tournament for months this year. So this victory was very satisfying.
He dominated the event, first eliminating Radjabov and Aronian, and then overcoming Nakamura in the final.

Peter Heine Nielsen annotates the decisive encounter between the finalists:

 

Note that the first game in the list does not include annotations; the second one does

Readers should not miss out other games, though. Veterans Aronian and Mamedyarov shone time and again, while young talents Duda and Alireza Firouzja did not do badly.

St. Petersburg prevails over Moscow

This issue also includes all the games from the Russian Team Championship, Sochi. As is known, St. Petersburg’s Bronze Horsemen prevailed over the Moscow Chess Team that finished second. The rivalry between the two cities — St. Petersburg was known as Leningrad in the Soviet era — is legendary, and still continues.

Moscow fielded more than one team in this competition. None came close to crowning glory, and it was not for want of trying. In the following game, young Predke goes all out to beat his more experienced opponent:

 

Among other teams, “Tyumen Wild Berries Youth” made quite an impression. Here we see their leader, Daniil Dubov, playing Nikita Vitiugov on the first board for the St. Petersburg Bronze Horsemen.

Daniil Dubov, Nikita Vitiugov

This game, with a fascinating opening experiment by Dubov, ended in a draw | Photo: Vladimir Barsky / Russian Chess Federation

He challenged Karpov and Kasparov

Before we come to the special feature in this issue, here is a question for our young readers:  who are the two friends sharing a carefree moment here?

Jan Timman, Hans Bohm

Here an older reader would interject, “I don’t wish to be a spoilsport, but aren’t they Jan Timman and Hans Bohm?”

That’s right. In the picture here they are seen in Biel Open Chess Tournament, 1969. Timman won the main event with 9/11 and Hans Böhm shared 3-6 places with other players on 7½/11. To his credit, Böhm also won the speed event.

Both became strong players. But it was Jan who went far and represented a serious challenge to both Karpov and Kasparov, competing with them in tournaments and matches. 

Only the other day he turned 70 and this issue offers him a tribute. There are 25 deeply annotated games with some of the greatest players in modern chess: Tal, Larsen, Korchnoi and Karpov, to mention a few. It’s a miniscule sample of his play. MegaBase alone offers more than 4000 of his games.

Opening videos and surveys

There are 3 opening videos in this issue. The first features a lecture on the Classical French by Rustam Kasimdzhanov; the second offers a lecture on the Smyslov Variation of the Grünfeld defence by Mihail Marin; and the third is an introduction to the Albin Counter-Gambit by Daniel King. Take your pick.

Incidentally, there are as many as 12 opening surveys, ranging from the Caro-Kann to the King’s Indian. Nimzo-Indian fans should check out the second part of the survey on the Saemisch Variation (4.f3).

Besides opening surveys, this issue has standard features on tactics, strategy and the endgame.

Summing up

The main database of the issue has 456 recent games, of which 48 are deeply annotated.
Commentators include Ian Nepomniachtchi, Boris Gelfand and Anish Giri, among others. Major contributions are made by Michal Krasenkov (16 games) and Romain Edouard 
(20 games).

It may be noted that there are more annotated games in the sections on opening theory and training. 

Well, practice makes perfect.


Notes 

  1. Both Nepomniachtchi and Vachier Lagrave have offered insights on the Candidates’ 2020-2021

Interview with Ian Nepomniachtchi conducted by the Russian Chess Federation

Maxime Vachier Lagrave wrote two blog posts on his performance in the Candidates’: Leading the Candidates | Candidates: see you next time!

There have been a couple of books on the Candidates’ Tournament 2020-2021. The first of them is Eight Good Men, edited by Dorian Rogozenco and published by Elk and Ruby. A pdf sample of the book can be found in this link

The second is a Russian title, Шахматная пьеса с антрактом на ковид. Турнир претендентов. Екатеринбург 2020–2021 by Vladimir Tukmakov.

Only the first half of the Russian text has found its way in English so far: A Feast of Chess in Time of Plague - Candidates Tournament 2020 - Part 1 – Yekaterinburg

  1. Way back in 1995 Jan Timman brought out a book, Timman’s Selected Games of Chess. This is still eminently readable. More recently New in Chess has published two titles, Timman’s Titans and Timman’s Triumphs.

Links


Prof. Nagesh Havanur (otherwise known as "chessbibliophile") is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has been writing on the Royal Game for nearly three decades. His articles and reviews have appeared on several web sites and magazines.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/31/2021 10:09
The Editor has obliged by giving the correct description of the picture of young Timman and Böhm. He has also inserted the very useful analytical comment by "oxygenes" in the Caruana-Vauchier Lagrave game.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 8/30/2021 03:20
I thought the (Biel) photo wasn't likely to be from a solving contest, as these normally wouldn't contain opening positions... (See the board foreground left.)
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/30/2021 09:45
What happened in the last round of OHRA 1984? That story needs to be told separately.
Some day I intend to do it here. Watch this space!
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/30/2021 09:18
The picture of Timman and Böhm here was taken in Biel Open 1969 as reader, Frits
Fritschy pointed out. I also confirmed it from Hans Böhm himself.
“The photo is from Biel Open 1969, where Jan won the tournament and I won the speed-tournament.”
But when I selected the image from the following article
https://en.chessbase.com/post/jan-timman-s-65th-birthday-study-tournament

it had the wrong url indicating that they were participating in a solving tournament in 1965. Subsequently that picture description has been changed.
No games from Biel Open 1969 have made it to MegaBase and as of now there is little information on this event.
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/29/2021 07:37
Reader, oxygenes is right. I had inadvertently reversed the move order in Jorden van Foreest’s analysis in New in Chess Magazine, #4, 2021.
He gives 19...Bxd4! 20.Rxd4 Qb3 21.Qg3 Qb1+ 22.Kf2 Qc2+ 23.Ke3 g5 24.Ba3 (Not 24.Bxb8?? f5–+) 24...Nc6 (The immediate 24...f5?? would lose to 25.Qd6+– as pointed out by oxygenes (not 25.QQ7? Kf7! (oxygenes) 26.Nd6+ Kg6 -+ )26.Nd6+ Ke7 27.Ne4+ (27.Nxc8+?? looks tempting, but after 27...Kf6! it would be Black who would deliver mate.) 27...Ke8 28.Nd6+ Ke7= Draw by perpetual check

I shall be requesting the Editor, News Page to rectify the error.
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/28/2021 03:08
There is considerable curiosity here on account of Hans Böhm and Jan Timman. I think, Dutch readers are familiar with this site:
https://www.hansbohm.com/2013/

Others may try the Google Translate version: https://bit.ly/3jnTlzC
The site was mentioned in a previous tribute to Timman on the news page here:
https://en.chessbase.com/post/jan-timman-s-65th-birthday-study-tournament
chessbibliophile chessbibliophile 8/28/2021 04:07
Vauchier-Lagrave played Sicilian Najdorf again in the recent Sinquefield Cup (an event that he won) He lost to Dominguez and drew with Caruana. Both his opponents played 6.Be3. The game with Fabiano is noteworthy:
https://en.chessbase.com/post/sinquefield-cup-2021-r6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqiAfhKb7dU
oxygenes oxygenes 8/27/2021 11:45
Analyse of Jorden von Foreest has misplayed order of moves. Correct is 24.- Nc6 25.Qc7 f5, because 24.- f5 lead into problems for black 25.Qd6, instead of 25.Qc7, which loses for 25.-Kf7
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 8/27/2021 11:26
Portisch didn't win, so I guess it took too long for that to be clear – which would have made a 'grandmaster draw' a bit problematic, for both Timman and Böhm.
Timman was sole winner in the end.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 8/27/2021 10:27
That was the final round of the OHRA tournament 1984. Timman would have agreed to a draw if Portisch would have done the same, which would have made Timman co-winner. Portisch won, so Timman had to play for a win. Their friendship didn't suffer, it seems.
The photo is not from a solving contest (a mistake probably made because of the Timman 70th birthday composition tournament, written about on chessbase, with this photo), but from Biel 1969. I wonder, is that Sosonko on the right? Can't find the participants.
fravatel fravatel 8/27/2021 10:06
Indeed Hans Böhm never became a GM and the story that was told, was that it was actually his old friend that beat him, when he just needed a draw to score the final norm. I do not know whether that is true though, may be Frits knows this.
Frits Fritschy Frits Fritschy 8/27/2021 09:48
Hans Böhm never made it to grandmaster, although he was close to it (as older Dutch readers can tell you). He made a career however on Dutch television. Don't know whether there is anything true in late GM Donner's reaction that you've got to have something of a criminal to be successful in that trade.
1