CBM 192: Caissa has the last word

by Nagesh Havanur
12/8/2019 – ChessBase Magazine offers a window to the world of professional chess. The current issue offers a bird’s eye view of three major events, the 7th Sinquefield Cup Tournament, the 72nd Russian Championship Superfinal and the FIDE World Cup. In a previous article, NAGESH HAVANUR analysed the performance of Ding Liren, who figured prominently in the magazine. Here he examines the performance of others. This issue includes 1949 games, 11 opening surveys, demo lectures and exercises for training; games annotated by Anand, Anish Giri and Peter Heine Nielsen, just to mention a few. | Photo: Austin Fuller / Grand Chess Tour

Analyses by Giri, Anand, Nisipeanu, Huschenbeth, Vidit, Vitiugov, Tomashevsky and many more. Plus videos by King, Shirov and l'Ami, 11 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and training sessions in strategy, tactics and endgame!

A challenge for young readers

In my last article, I dealt with the games of Ding Liren who figured prominently in this issue. This time we shall take a look at the rest of the magazine. The current issue includes games from three important events, Sinquefield Tournament, FIDE World Cup and Russian Championship Superfinal.

First comes the Sinquefield Cup on our list. In this issue, Peter Heine Nielsen has annotated Carlsen's games against Wesley So and Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. I have an old issue with his writing. On occasion, he tends to go overboard in praising the play of Magnus; otherwise his analysis is worth a look. Don't forget that he is the world champion's second and shares his insights with readers.

In this magazine, you also find Anand's annotations of his frustrating draw with Wesley So, in which he missed a win.  As is known, he also missed wins over Ding Liren, Anish Giri and Mamedyarov. Here I shall mention the encounter with Mamedyarov. 

Shakhriyar Mamedyarov, Viswanathan Anand

Vishy Anand on the background, as Shakhriyar Mamedyarov ponders how to continue | Photo: Justin Kellar / Grand Chess Tour

Early in the game Anand was one pawn up. Instead of regaining the pawn, Mamedyarov offered him another and launched a brilliant counterattack. In the end it was a draw. Subsequently, analysts found a win in the following position. The challenge for young readers is to see what he missed.

 
Anand vs. Mamedyarov - 2019 Sinquefield Cup
White to move

Set your chess clock and give yourself a generous 10-minute time limit. Otherwise, tournament conditions have to be followed. It’s touch and move and you are not going to ask good old Fritz for advice...

Are you ready? 10 minutes are over. Some of you have played like Tal himself. As a result, you are a whole rook down! But where is the win? (Scroll down for the solution if you haven’t found it yet!)

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
19.Rd1! The game continued 19.Qe2? and was drawn after many vicissitudes. 19...Qe6 20.Rd7 a6 21.Ba4 Rac8 22.Rxe7 Eliminating the main defender of the king. Qxe7 23.Bxh6! gxh6 24.Nf5 Qf6 25.Nxh6+ Kg7 26.Nf5+ Kg8 27.Qg4+ Kh8 Apparently White's attack has come to a standstill. He cannot play Rd1-Rd3 preparing Rh3+ as Black would play ...Rd8 challenging him. 28.c4‼ The humble pawn makes way for Ra3 and Rh3+. Bxe4 If 28...Bd6 29.Rd1 followed by 12.Rd3 and Rh3+. The Black bishop comes in the way of his rooks challenging the occupation of the d-file by the white rook. 29.Qxe4 Rg8 30.Ra3 Rg5 31.Qh4+ Kg8 32.Nh6+ Kg7 33.Rf3+-
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Anand,V2756Mamedyarov,S276420197th Sinquefield Cup

Fate plays the game of dice

How else can one describe the play in the FIDE World Cup? Inspiration collided with insanity in this marathon event. This issue has more than 430 games — of which 12 are annotated. Anish Giri has annotated the games Radjabov vs Vachier Lagrave and Ding Liren vs YuYangyi  from the semi-finals. 

So make it a point to check out those games in the magazine. The quarter-finals were also hard-fought. The following is a tragicomedy:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.d3 The Old Line of the Two Knights' Defence 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Na5 6.Bb5+ c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Be2 is well-analysed and no longer played at the GM level. 4.c3 Bc5 5.d3 is currently the main line of the Giuoco Piano or Italian Game. The previous line 5.d4 exd4 6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2 Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 offers little for White. 4...Bc5 5.c3 Transposing to the Giuoco Piano or the Italian Game. Both players have experience of this line. Levon has contributed much to the theory of this opening. a6 6.0-0 d6 7.a4 White can sweep the whole board moving on one front after another. Here he expands on the queenside. 0-0 8.Re1 8.Nbd2 transposes to the main line. So does 8.h3 8...Ba7 9.h3 A prophylactic move preventing ...Bg4 so that he can play d3-d4. h6 Black makes this move for similar reasons, preventing Ng5 so that he can play ...Be6. 10.Nbd2 Re8 11.b4 White goes ahead with the expansion on the queenside. Be6 12.Bxe6 Rxe6 13.Nf1 Qd7 Cautious play by Aronian who is known to strike with ...d6-d5 early in the opening. 13...d5 14.Qc2 Qd7 is otherwise played here. 14.Be3 14.Ng3 would have preserved tension in the position. 14...Bxe3 This is necessary as the bishop can do little with his counterpart across the diagonal "staring in its face". Also, the rook and the knight no longer have to guard him. The careless move 14...Rd8?? loses a piece after 15.b5+- 15.Nxe3 d5 Black has to initiate energetic counterplay in the centre. Otherwise he would be smothered first on the queenside and then on the kingside. 16.b5 Ne7 17.c4 White's invasion of the queenside is in full swing. d4 Complicating the position. If 17...dxc4 18.Nxc4 Or 17...c6 18.d4 Nxe4 19.Nxe5 The way to easy equality may be 17...dxe4 18.dxe4 Qxd1 19.Raxd1 axb5 20.axb5 c6= 18.Nf5 Usually, this move is strong in this line. However, here White no longer has the bishop to target dark squares like h3 on the kingside. Also, the black knight on e7 neutralises his counterpart on f5. 18.Nd5 Ng6 with chances for both sides is preferable. 18...Re8 19.N3h4 Ng6 20.g3 Nxh4 21.Nxh4 Qe7 22.Qc1 22.Nf5 Qb4 23.Qc2 deserves attention. 22...Nd7 23.Qa3 Nc5 24.f4? A terrible move. White breaks up his own kingside for an attack that never comes about. 24.a5 followed by 25. Red1 was a reasonable choice. 24...exf4 25.Nf5 Qf8 26.gxf4 Rf6! 26...Rd8 defending the pawn is too tame. 27.Rf1 27.Nxd4?? Rd8 28.Qc3 Rfd6 29.Nf5 Rxd3 30.Qe5 R8d7 31.bxa6 bxa6 32.Rab1 f6! 32...Rxh3?? 33.Rb8!+- 33.Qb2 Nb3! 33...Rxh3 34.Qg2 Rhd3 35.Nxh6+ Kh7 36.Nf5 34.Qg2 Nd2 35.Nxh6+ Kh7 36.Nf5 Nxb1 37.Rxb1 g6 38.Nh4 Qc5+ 39.Kh1 Qh5-+ If 27.Rad1 g6 28.Ng3 28.Nxd4 fails to axb5 29.axb5 Rxf4-+ Apart from the king, the knight on d4 would be targeted with...Rd8 and ...Qg7. 28...axb5 Black opens up the a-file so that the other rook can invade the seventh rank after playing ...Ra8. If White responds with 29.cxb5, the a4-pawn becomes a target for the knight as the queen has to reach the kingside to defend. 29.axb5 Rxf4-+ 27...Rxf5‼ 28.exf5 Re3 29.Rae1 Qe7 30.Rxe3 Qxe3+ 31.Kh2 Qe2+? Aronian has played superb chess so far. Now he falters. An immediate pawn capture with 31...Nxd3? would allow White to launch a counterattack with 32.f6! gxf6 33.Rg1+ Kh7 34.Qf8 forcing Black to take a draw with perpetual check. Qxf4+ 35.Rg3 Qf2+= He could have crowned his play with 31...Ne4‼ 32.f6 Qg3+ 33.Kh1 Qxh3+ 34.Kg1 Qg3+ 35.Kh1 Nd2 36.Qc1 Nf3 37.Rxf3 Qxf3+ 38.Kg1 Qxd3-+ 32.Kg1 Nxd3 33.bxa6 bxa6 34.Qb3 Qe3+ 35.Kh2 Qd2+ 36.Kg1 Qe3+ 37.Kh2 h5? Short of forces, Aronian hopes to press this pawn also into attack. There was nothing more than perpetual check with 37...Qe2+! 38.Kg1 Qe3+ 39.Kh2 Not 39.Kh1?? Nf2+-+ 39...Qe2+= 38.Qd1! Apparently the queen is targeting the pawn on h5. However, she has another concealed threat. h4?? While offering the threat 39... Qg3+ 40. Kh1 Nf2+, he has overlooked the danger to himself. He had to go for a draw with 38...Nxf4 39.Qf3 Nd3 40.Qxh5 Ne5 Or with the other line 38...Nf2 39.Qxh5 Ne4 39.Rf3!+- The point. Now the tide turns. Nb2 40.Rxe3 Nxd1 41.Rd3 Nb2 42.Rxd4 The rest is a matter of technique. c5 43.Rd5 Nxa4 44.Kg2 Kf8 45.Kf3 Ke7 46.Kg4 Nb6 47.Rxc5 Kd6 48.Ra5 Nxc4 49.Rxa6+ Ke7 50.Kxh4 Nd6 51.Rxd6! Kxd6 52.Kg5 Ke7 53.f6+ 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier Lagrave,M2774Aronian,L27581–02019C54FIDE World Cup 5.4

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave was knocked out of the World Cup in the semi-finals | Photo: FIDE

This brings us to games from the 72nd Russian Superfinal included in the magazine. The absence of players like Nepomniachtchi, Grischuk and Karjakin left a void. However, the performance of Tomashevsky and Vitiugov — who came first and second — redeemed the event a bit. While European Champion Vladislav Artemiev disappointed, other talents like Alekseenko shone. Nikita Vitiugov was a little unlucky to finish half a point behind Tomashevsky. I was particularly impressed by the standard of his play and the quality of annotations to the following game.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
This game was played in the sixth round. In the previous game, Vladislav dramatically lost to Dreev, having blundered a rook in a very good position. Looking back, it seems that this game was one of the crucial ones in the tournament. But this is just hindsight. Before this very game, Artemiev hadn't lost with White for quite a while. 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bb5 Nd4 The main answer. In general, the line is considered to be harmless for Black. 5.Bc4 Bc5 6.0-0 Vladislav is used to play 6.d3 d6 7.h3 The main position arises after 7.Na4 b5 8.Nxd4 bxc4 9.Nf5 Bxf5 10.exf5 cxd3 11.Nxc5 dxc5 etc. 7...h6 7...c6 8.Nxd4 Bxd4 9.Qf3 Be6 10.Ne2 Bb6 11.Ng3 Qd7 12.Bg5 Bd8 13.0-0 h6 14.Be3 Bb6 15.Rad1 Rd8 16.Bb3 Qe7 17.Bxb6 axb6 18.Qe3 c5 19.f4 1-0 (42) Artemiev,V (2703)-Bocharov,I (2565) Cheliabinsk 2018 8.Nxd4 Bxd4 9.Qf3 Qe7 10.Ne2 Bb6 11.Ng3 c6 12.0-0 g6 13.c3 Be6 14.Bb3 Nd7 15.Be3 h5 16.d4 1-0 (36) Artemiev,V (2706)-Oparin,G (2624) Sochi RUS 2018 6...d6 7.Nxd4 Bxd4 8.d3 Be6 The most natural. 8...0-0 9.h3 Be6 10.Bb3 h6 11.Qf3 Bxc3 12.bxc3 c5 13.Bxe6 fxe6 14.c4 Qd7 15.a4 Rf7 16.a5 and despite White eventually won, I don't think Black is in troubles. Kryvoruchko,Y (2678)-Adams,M (2740) Tromso 2013. 9.Ne2 Bb6 10.Ng3 0-0 10...h5!? 11.Bxe6 fxe6 12.h3∞ 11.Bb3 a5?! Wrong move order. Better was 11...h6 12.c3 and if 12.h3 a5 12...d5 12.c3 h6 13.h3 White had an extra option: 13.d4!? Bxb3 14.axb3 exd4 15.cxd4 Re8 16.Re1 with some chances for pressure. 13.Bc2 d5 13.Be3?! Bxe3 14.fxe3 Bd7! 15.Nf5? a4 16.Bc2 g6! and Black is better. 13...d5 14.Qf3 a4 15.Bc2 Re8 16.Rd1?! I think the logical 16.Nf5 Bxf5 17.Qxf5 c6 led to a balanced position. 16.d4? dxe4 17.Nxe4 exd4 18.Nxf6+ Qxf6 19.Qxf6 gxf6 20.Bxh6 a3 16...d4 Now White is obviously worse. 17.c4? I don't like this move at all. Better was 17.Bd2 Or even 17.Rf1!? 17...c6 More flexible than ...c5 - now the knight may come to c5 and there is an option with ...b5. 18.Qe2 Nd7 19.Bd2 Ba5 20.b4 axb3 21.axb3 Bxd2 22.Qxd2 Qb6 Preparing to conquer the line by ...Ra6. Another way was 22...b5 23.cxb5 cxb5 24.b4 Qc7 23.Qe1! Not so difficult, but good. c5 24.Rdb1 Qd6 25.Qc1 Kh7 26.Ra3 Reb8 During the game I wasn't sure what was better - the way I played or trying to create some pressure on the kingside with more pieces on the board. But after for example 26...g6!? 27.Rba1 Rab8 28.Bd1 Rg8 29.Nf1 f5 30.exf5 gxf5 31.Ng3 Nf6 32.Bf3 Black has nothing special. 27.Rba1 Rxa3 28.Rxa3 g6 29.Ra7 Kg7 30.Kh2 Nf6 A good manoeuvre - the knight is going to c6. 31.Bd1 Ng8 32.Be2 White could have swapped bishops, but I am not sure it gives any relief: 32.Bg4 Bxg4 33.hxg4 Qe6 34.f3 Ne7 32...Ne7 33.h4?! Probably not so bad, but not necessary. Nc6 34.Ra3 Qd8 35.h5 Ra8 Now Black has two ways to disturb the opponent - the a-file and some squares on the kingside. 36.hxg6 fxg6 37.Rxa8 Qxa8 38.Kg1 Qa5! 39.f4?! An active move, but now definitely the wrong one. exf4 40.Qxf4 Qd8 Just in time - Black controls all the black squares! 41.Nf1 Qb8 42.Qh4 Qe5 43.Nh2 Qf6 44.Qg3 Qe5 45.Qh4 h5 Now Black's got two options to improve the position - the bishop goes to g4 and the king to h6. Another way was also good, but h5 is just stronger: 45...g5 46.Qf2 Qf4 47.Qxf4 gxf4 46.Nf3 Qf6 47.Qg3 Bg4 48.Kf2 Kh6 49.Qc7 h4 50.Qxb7 Bxf3?! Stronger was 50...Ne5! 51.Qb8 Bxf3 52.gxf3 h3 and the winning way being simple but nice: 53.Kg3 Kg5 54.Qc8 Qf4+ 55.Kxh3 Qh4+ 56.Kg2 Kf4 57.Qh3 Qxh3+ 58.Kxh3 Ke3-+ 51.gxf3 Qd6 Now after 51...Ne5 White has 52.Qc8 52.e5! Nxe5 53.f4 53.Qe4 g5 54.f4 Ng6 The queens' exchange is coming with an easily winning endgame for Black. 53...Nd7 54.Bf3 Nf6 We were playing mainly on the increment. Of course, it was very difficult for White to find the toughest defensive moves. 55.Qf7 After the game Vladislav suggested that 55.Qc8 was the way, but after g5 56.Qh8+ Kg6 57.fxg5 Qg3+ 58.Ke2 Qxg5 59.Be4+ Nxe4 60.Qe8+ Kg7 61.dxe4 White is lost. 55...h3 56.Kg3 h2 57.Kxh2? Loses on the spot. However, the only path to continue the game was 57.Kh3! Nh5 58.Kg4! which is almost impossible to find on seconds. 57...Qxf4+ 58.Kg2 Nh5! 59.Qd5 Not helping was 59.Qxf4+ Nxf4+ 60.Kg3 Kg5 Some chances might be there after 60...Nxd3 61.Be4 Nb4 62.Kf4 but even here Black is winning. 61.Be4 Ne2+ 62.Kf3 Nc1 63.Bc6 Nxd3-+ 59...Qd2+ 60.Kg1 Qe1+ 61.Kh2 Qf2+ 62.Bg2 Nf4 The pawn endgame is coming, White is lost. 63.Qa8 Qxg2+ 64.Qxg2 Nxg2 65.Kxg2 Kg5 66.Kg3 Kf5 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Artemiev,V2757Vitiugov,N27280–12019C48RUS-ch 72nd6

Russian Chess Superfinal 2019

The playing hall at this year's Russian Superfinal | Photo: Eteri Kublashvili

Apart from standard features on middlegame tactics, endgame play and training, this issue has as many as eleven opening surveys, ranging from the Caro-Kann to the King's Indian. Among them, Igor Stohl’s commentary on the Chinese Dragon and Tanmay Srinath’s analysis of the Four Pawns Attack against the Modern Benoni merit special mention. Stohl mentions, inter alia, how the Chinese Dragon got its name: Belgian FM Luc Henris spent some years in China and during those days he analysed this variation. When he wrote an article on the same for the New in Chess Yearbook 2002 he gave it this name and it stuck.

Among the opening videos Alexie Shirov’s commentary on the Najdorf with 6.h3 e5 7.♘b3 merits special mention. For reasons of space, I have not dealt with these opening surveys and videos here, as they deserve a more detailed consideration.

Analyses by Giri, Anand, Nisipeanu, Huschenbeth, Vidit, Vitiugov, Tomashevsky and many more. Plus videos by King, Shirov and l'Ami, 11 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and training sessions in strategy, tactics and endgame!

The main database of the issue has 1949 recent games, of which 28 are deeply annotated. Apart from the GMs I have already mentioned, the commentators include Niclas Huschenbeth, Liviu-Dieter Nisipeanu, Rustam Kasimdzhanov and Evgeny Tomashevsky, among others. It may be pointed out that there are more annotated games in the sections on opening theory and training.

Recommended.  

Links


Prof. Nagesh Havanur (otherwise known as "chessbibliophile") is a senior academic and research scholar. He taught English in Mumbai for three decades and has now settled in Bangalore, India. His interests include chess history, biography and opening theory. He has been writing on the Royal Game for more than three decades. His articles and reviews have appeared on several web sites and magazines.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.