Candidates Round 7: Vachier-Lagrave takes down Nepomniachtchi

by Carlos Alberto Colodro
3/25/2020 – Ian Nepomniachtchi went into the second rest day of the Candidates Tournament leading by a full point. The only other player with a plus score was Maxime Vachier-Lagrave. Today the two played each other, and Vachier-Lagrave, who had the white pieces, outplayed the Russian and caught up with him in the standings table, a full point ahead of the field. The remaining three games ended drawn. Expert analysis by GMs DANIEL FERNANDEZ and SIMON WILLIAMS. | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

A Frenchman beats the French

The eight-player Candidates tournament is one of the most prestigious global chess events, held every two years. The event will determine who will challenge the defender Magnus Carlsen for the title of the World Chess Champion. This year’s event has a prize fund of 500,000 Euros, which is the highest ever in the history of the Candidates tournaments.


All the results from round seven:

Name Result Name
Caruana Fabiano ½ - ½ Wang Hao
Vachier-Lagrave Maxime 1 - 0 Nepomniachtchi Ian
Ding Liren ½ - ½ Alekseenko Kirill
Giri Anish ½ - ½ Grischuk Alexander

Round eight takes place on Thursday, March 26 at 4:00 p.m. local time. Pairings:

Name Result Name
Caruana Fabiano   Vachier-Lagrave Maxime
Wang Hao   Ding Liren
Nepomniachtchi Ian   Giri Anish
Alekseenko Kirill   Grischuk Alexander

The key encounter of round seven was the one that finished decisively, as Maxime Vachier-Lagrave caught up with Ian Nepomniachtchi in the standings by beating him with the white pieces in their direct face-off. 'Nepo' employed the Winawer Variation of the French Defence for a second time in Yekaterinburg and was duly outplayed after incorrectly deciding to close the structure on the queenside.

Nepomniachtchi's defeat reminds us of his backset at the Croatian leg of the Grand Chess Tour last year, when he started with three straight wins and went on to give up the lead by losing in rounds six and seven. Maxime Vachier-Lagrave's win against Nepomniachtchi could also be crucial should Vachier-Lagrave and Nepomniachtchi share first place at the end of this tournament: in this case Vachier-Lagrave would win the tournament on tie-break.

To quote the Candidates Tournament Regulations on tie-breaks:

If of two (2) or more players score the same number of points, the tie is decided by the following criteria, in order of priority:

a)The results of the games between the players involved in the tie.
b) Each tied player’s total number of wins in the tournament.
c) Sonneborn-Berger System.

After the first half of the tournament two players still remain undefeated: Vachier-Lagrave and Alexander Grischuk, who drew all seven of his games.

The remaining games of the round finished drawn. Fabiano Caruana could not get much against Wang Hao's Petroff Defence, Alexander Grischuk found a couple of critical moves to neutralize Anish Giri's new idea in the opening, and Ding Liren was disappointed with his play after needing to defend an inferior position with White against Kirill Alekseenko.

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave, Ian Nepomniachtchi

In contrasting moods — co-leaders Nepomniachtchi and Vachier-Lagrave leaving the stage | Photo: Maria Emelianova / FIDE

Vachier-Lagrave 1:0 Nepomniachtchi

By now we are already used to see an almost invariable set of openings at elite events — particularly the Candidates Tournaments and the World Championship matches. Berlins, Najdorfs, Petroffs, Italians and Slavs are intensely prepared by super-strong teams of grandmasters working for the protagonists. Seldom do we see these players using the Caro-Kann, the Pirc (unless when in absolute need of a win with Black) or the Scandinavian, to name a few. In Yekateriburg, however, Nepomniachtchi has already employed the French Winawer twice — not as a one-off surprise weapon. 

Against Alekseenko in round three, 'Nepo' did get a strategic edge, although his opponent also missed a tactical shot that might have completely changed the course of the event, while in his match-up against Vachier-Lagrave he was the one on the back foot from a rather early stage:

 
Vachier-Lagrave vs. Nepomniachtchi
Position after 18.Ne2

In the post-game interview, Vachier-Lagrave mentioned that he did not really expect his opponent to play the French, but that he was prepared for it given he had already used it against Alekseenko. He was also critical of his rival's decision to play 18...c4 here, explaining that usually closing the queenside makes sense for Black, except that here White is in time to advance his f and g-pawns — as was seen in the game — targeting the fairly vulnerable black monarch.

Vachier-Lagrave was happy with the way he handled his advantage, noting that his 35th move was important during the conversion:

 
Position after 34...Kf8

As 'MVL' explained, 35.a1 prevents Black from advancing his passer on the queenside while threatening to infiltrate the black position. The Frenchman showcased his calculation abilities to force Nepomniachtchi's resignation on move 42. He was satisfied with his performance:

The important thing is to play well, and so far, apart from the game against Wang Hao, I think I played reasonably well. So far I'm quite happy and I hope to continue this trend.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e6 Black decides not to venture the Najdorf against a fellow expert. 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 Ne7 7.h4 Qc7 Ian repeats his opening from a few rounds before. 8.h5 8.Nf3 b6 9.Bb5+ Bd7 10.Be2 Ba4 11.0-0 Nd7 12.Be3 h6 13.Ra2 Nf5 14.Bf4 Qc6 15.Rb2= Alekseenko, K-Nepomniachtchi,I Yekaterinburg 2020 8...h6 9.Rb1 b6 10.Qg4 Rg8!? 10...Kf8 11.Rh3 Ba6 12.Bxa6 Nxa6 13.Ne2 cxd4 14.cxd4 Qxc2 15.Rb2 Qe4 16.Qxe4 dxe4 17.Nc3 Rc8 18.Bd2 Rc4 19.Nxe4 19.Nb5! 19...Rxd4 20.Nd6 Nc5 21.Ke2 Rd5 Dominguez Perez,L-So,W Saint Louis 2017 11.Bb5+ White tries to finesse his bishop to d3 using an idea from various 1.d4 openings such as the Catalan or Nimzo-Indian. Both sides, as well as previous analysts, must have known that White really wants to develop the bishop to d3. However, here there are details that make it a less than ideal plan: 11.Bd3 cxd4 12.cxd4 Ba6! Challenging the d3-bishop in this way is Black's main idea in almost any French line involving ...b6. 13.Bh7 Kf8‼ White doesn't have time to take on g8 because of ...Qxc2, thus after the ...Rh8 which Black undoubtedly intends to play next he will have lost 2 tempi. 11...Kf8N A logical novelty. In the previous game Black played 11...Bd7 thus renouncing his wish to develop this piece to a6. White reacted with the principled 12.Bd3 threatening Bh7 and in my opinion he has a slight advantage here. Nf5 13.Qf4 Nc6?? 14.Bxf5 exf5 15.e6 Qxf4 16.exd7+ Kxd7 17.Bxf4+- Bartel,M-Jaroch,K Zgierz 2017 After 11...Nd7 White is under no obligation to retreat the bishop on b5; it can never really be trapped because he can always take on d7 at the last moment. 12.Bd3 12.a4 c4 12...Ba6 Obviously, White isn't going to play Bh7 now as there would be no point; rather, he will try and claim that ...Kf8 was also a concession of some kind. 13.dxc5 Bxd3 14.cxd3 Nd7 One of several moves of approximately equal value, in a tremendously complicated position. 14...bxc5= The computer also suggests the remarkably chilled-out 14...Rh8 intending ...Kg8-h7. 15.d4 bxc5 16.Qd1 Qa5 Over the next few moves Black drifts a bit, not improving his king position but also not grabbing pawns to compensate for it. 16...Nc6!? 17.f4 f5 17...Qa5?! is again a bit slow: 18.Bd2 Ke7 19.f5 Rab8 20.fxe6 fxe6 21.Ne2 18.g4 fxg4 19.f5! exf5 20.Ne2∞ White has to go all-in, and I think this works out for him. Therefore, it seems like a better order to start with 16...Rb8 : 17.Rxb8+ 17.Bd2 Nc6 Back to plan A, now that White can't simply reply with f4. 18.Ne2 18.f4 Rxb1! 19.Qxb1 Qb6 18...Ke7 19.0-0 Qa5 20.Rxb8 20.f4?! Rxb1 21.Qxb1 Nxd4 17...Qxb8 18.Ne2 c4! Closing the centre. 19.0-0 Qb3∞ With the idea of, for instance, ...Nb6 and ...Ke8-d7. Even if White somehow wins a pawn he won't be better. 17.Bd2 Rb8 18.Ne2 c4?! Black realises the catch-22 a bit late: to connect rooks his king has to get to the 7th rank, which means he has to move one or other knight, but then White will open the centre before Black has connected rooks, either with dxc5 or f4. There were still some workarounds like 18...Rxb1!? 19.Qxb1 Qa6 followed by ...Ke8-d8-c7 or ...f5. 20.a4!? 20.Be3 cxd4 21.cxd4 f5= 20.f3 Ke8 21.Kf2 Kd8 22.a4 Kc7= 20...f5 21.exf6 Nxf6 22.Qb5 Qxb5 23.axb5 Kf7 24.Bf4 cxd4 25.cxd4 Rc8 19.0-0 Rb6 20.Qc2 The problem is that Black cannot prevent f4-f5 in the long term, except by playing the (undesirable) ...f5 himself. Then White may be able to play g4, but definitely taking on f6 is also an option. Rh8?! This is a 'nothing' move. Against ... Nc6 White might well have intended Qh7, but then again he might not, and removing that optionality is not worth one tempo. 20...Qxa3 21.Bc1 Qa6 22.Rb2!± A 'computer move' which has the idea of Ra2 and Ba3. 20...f5 21.exf6 Nxf6 22.Rxb6 axb6 23.Nf4 Kf7 24.Re1± The lesser evil was probably 20...Nb8! 21.a4 Nbc6 which stalls the idea of Bc1-a3 while also cuing up ...Ke8-d7. 21.a4 Ke8 22.Rb4 It seems like White has decided to try and play Ba3 without improving Black's structure. 22.Rxb6!? axb6 23.Bc1± 22...Nc6?! 23.f4! Ne7 After all Black's dithering it seems he now has a nearly lost position. 23...Nxb4? 24.cxb4 Qa6 24...Rxb4 25.Qc3+- 25.b5 Qb7 26.Bb4+- 24.Rfb1 f5 25.Rb5 Qa6 26.Bc1 Kf7?! Black makes a decision to more or less sit tight. It was possible to try and run the gauntlet: 26...g6 27.Ba3 Rxb5 28.Rxb5 gxh5± though White has numerous appealing options, like the piece sacrifice 29.Bxe7 Kxe7 30.Ng3 h4 31.Nxf5+ exf5 32.Qxf5 with a strong attack. 27.Ba3 Rhb8 28.Bxe7 Kxe7 29.g4 Rxb5 30.axb5 Rxb5 31.gxf5 Rxb1+ 32.Qxb1 exf5 33.Ng3!+- The f5-pawn is doomed anyway and it's better to take there with the knight, so that he can continue on his route to d6 in some lines. White finishes very crisply. Qb6 34.Nxf5+ Kf8 35.Qa1 Qe6 36.Ng3 Qg4 37.Kg2 Qxf4 38.Qxa7 Ke7 39.Qa3+ Kd8 40.Qd6 g5 41.hxg6 h5 42.g7 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier-Lagrave,M-Nepomniachtchi,I-1–02020C18FIDE Candidates7

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

The man of the hour | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

Giri ½:½ Grischuk

The players repeated nine moves from a Tomashevsky v Grischuk game from last year's World Blitz Championship. Not surprisingly, Giri had something ready against this line, showing what he called 'an interesting new idea' with 10.e3. Grischuk thought for almost half an hour before responding with 10...h5, which Giri thought was, in fact, a very difficult move to make. After 11.d4 exd3 12.exd3, the Russian played another 'sophisticated move' (Giri):

 
Giri vs. Grischuk
Position after 12.exd3

Grischuk spent six minutes on 12...d4, and White had trouble looking for some way to create an imbalance in his favour. In the end, a well-played game left each player with half a point.

With his trademark sense of humour, Giri noted that perhaps he was not really looking for a win, as his opponent has drawn all his games so far and is 'threatening' to repeat his feat of drawing all fourteen games in a Candidates event:

I had a conflict of interests, because on the one hand I wanted to win of course, but on the other I wanted Alexander to make all the draws, so the spirit left from within me towards him.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.c4 e5 2.g3 c6 3.Nf3 Another major line is 3.d4 . 3...e4 4.Nd4 d5 5.cxd5 Qxd5 6.Nc2 Nf6 7.Nc3 Qe5 8.Bg2 Na6 As Black Giri had chosen to try and bring the knight to c6. 8...Be7 9.0-0 0-0 10.f4 10.Nxe4!? Nxe4 11.f4 Qe6 12.f5 Qd5 13.g4 Bc5+ 14.Kh1 Nd7 15.d3 Ndf6 10...exf3 11.Rxf3 c5! 12.Ne3 Nc6 13.Qf1 Nd4 14.Rf4 Be6 15.b3 Rab8 16.Nc4 Qc7 Grandelius,N-Giri,A Stavanger 2016 9.0-0 Be7 Waiting for White to make another move before pushing on the kingside. 9...h5?! This move is tempting but premature. Black can get away with these ideas in the thematically similar 4...Nf6 Caro-Kann, but not here. 10.d4! Qe6 11.Bg5 h4 12.Bxh4 Rxh4 13.gxh4 Qg4 14.Nxe4! Nxe4 15.f3 Qg6 16.fxe4 Bh3 17.Rf2 Bxg2 18.Rxg2 Qxe4 19.Qd3+- Martinez Alcantara,J-Vitiugov,N Riga 2019 10.Ne3 h5 Like Giri himself a couple of days ago, Grischuk doesn't really want to deliver mate along the h-file, but rather just hint that such a thing is possible to encourage his opponent to simplify. 11.d4 11.h4 Bc5= 11...exd3 12.exd3 Qd4 Black plays in principled fashion. He intends ...Nc5 and the position is basically equal. 13.Nc2 Qg4 14.Bf4 Qxd1 15.Raxd1 Bg4 16.Rd2 0-0-0= 17.d4 Nc7 18.Ne3 Be6 19.d5 White recognised that this pawn was about to be blockaded, so after half an hour's thought decided to push (even at the possible cost of killing the game.) After 19.Bxc7 Kxc7 20.d5 , unlike in the game, Grischuk could have very seriously considered playing Bc5!? forcing White to simplify on different terms. 20...cxd5 21.Rfd1 Rd7 22.Ncxd5+ Nxd5 23.Nxd5+ Bxd5 24.Rxd5 Rxd5 25.Rxd5 h4= 21.Rc2 21.Rfd1 Bxe3 22.fxe3 Bxd5 23.Bxd5 cxd5 24.Nxd5+ Rxd5 25.Rxd5 Nxd5 26.Rxd5 h4= Black can play on a bit in this equal rook ending due to his better structure. 21...Bxe3 22.dxe6 Rd2 23.Rxd2 Bxd2 24.exf7 Bxc3! 25.bxc3 Rf8= The position is imbalanced but dynamically equal. 19...Ncxd5 A sedate, sensible reply; Grischuk is happy to draw. Black had the incredible option of 19...Bc5!? but it isn't even clear to me that he benefits if White gives the exchange. 20.dxe6 Rxd2 21.exf7∞ 20.Ncxd5 Nxd5 21.Nxd5 Bxd5 22.Rxd5 22.Bxd5 is the same. With two pairs of rooks on the board Black can't recapture with the pawn: cxd5? 23.Rc1+ Kd7 24.Rc7+ Ke8 25.Rxb7± 22...Rxd5 23.Bxd5 cxd5 24.Rc1+ Kd7 25.Rc7+ Ke6 26.Rxb7 Rc8 27.Rxa7 Rc2 28.Be3 Bf6 29.Ra4 Bxb2 30.Kg2 d4 You could reasonably ask whether Black really had to destroy all the tension immediately. Was it possible to play for a later ...d4 instead, perhaps after preparing with ...g5? Well, I think it was possible, but Grischuk no longer felt it was conceivable that the game would leave the drawing margin, and so concluded things without spending too much energy. 30...f6!? 31.h4 Rc4 32.Ra7 d4 33.Bf4= 30...Rc4 31.Ra6+ Kf5 32.Ra7= 31.Bxd4 Bxd4 32.Rxd4 Rxa2 There follow some quite amusing non-moves to reach the point of allowed draw offers. 33.Re4+ Kf6 34.Rf4+ Ke6 35.Re4+ Kf6 36.Rf4+ Ke6 37.Re4+ Kf6 38.Rf4+ Ke6 39.h4 g6 40.Re4+ Kf6 A very correct draw. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A-Grischuk,A-½–½2020A20FIDE Candidates7

Anish Giri, Alexander Grischuk

Two of the strongest interviewees in the chess world | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

Caruana ½:½ Wang Hao

Wang Hao played the Petroff once again, and entered a line which Caruana himself had employed to draw Magnus Carlsen at the 2018 World Championship match. As the American explained, the variation is not very popular despite being very good, as White can only choose between entering an endgame — as happened in the game — or playing very sharp lines that need to be precisely remembered.

Wang's 21st move was praises by his opponent:

 
Caruana vs. Wang Hao
Position after 21.Bg5

21...f7 is the kind of move that perhaps would not cross many amateur players' minds. From this point on, Caruana started playing slightly carelessly and eventually needed to be precise to maintain the balance. Wang did not feel he had realistic winning chances, and the draw was signed after 41 moves.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Nxe5 d6 4.Nf3 Nxe4 5.Nc3 Nxc3 6.dxc3 Be7 7.Be3 0-0 8.Qd2 Nd7 9.0-0-0 Nf6 Of course, this opening by Wang is mostly notable due to having been Caruana's own choice in a certain other game with a fair amount of competitive significance. 10.Bd3 c5 11.Rhe1 Be6 12.Kb1 Qa5 13.c4 13.a3!? c4 14.Be2 Ne4 15.Qc1 d5 16.Bd4 I think this line still deserves a closer look. Rac8 17.Ne5 Nd6 17...Bc5!? 18.Bg4 Rfe8?? 19.Qf4? 19.Nxf7 Bxf7 20.Rxe7+- 19...Bf8 20.Re3 Qc7 21.Rde1 Ne4 22.Bxe6 Rxe6 23.f3 Nd6 24.Ng4 Caruana,F-Duda,J Paris 2019 13...Qxd2 14.Nxd2 14.Bxd2 h6 15.Nh4 15.b3 Rad8 16.Bf5 Bxf5 17.Rxe7 d5 18.Rxb7 dxc4 19.Kc1 Nepomniachtchi,I-Duda,J Paris 2019 15...Rfe8 16.Ng6 Ng4 17.Nxe7+ Rxe7 18.Re2 Ne5 19.Bf4 Nxd3 20.Rxd3 Rd7 21.Rxd6 Rxd6 22.Bxd6 Rd8 23.Rd2 Bxc4= Carlsen,M-Caruana,F London 2018 14...Rad8 15.f3 b6 16.g4!? Black was ready to play ...d5 and liquidate both his own backward pawn and White's doubled pawn, so that the structure would be completely symmetrical. Caruana decides to try and introduce some slightly more complex problems into the position. d5 16...Nd7!? 17.g5 Nh5 18.cxd5 Bxd5 19.Ne4 f5 20.gxf6 Nxf6 21.Bg5 Kf7 White's problem now is that all his efforts to unbalance the position have left him with a worse structure, and he needs to look for something concrete. Black's problem is that the present move gives White a sliver of a chance to justify his choices. 21...c4 22.Nc3 cxd3 23.Rxe7 Bxf3 24.Rxd3 Rxd3 25.cxd3 Rf7= White may need to limit his ambitions quite explicitly in order to keep this position equal. 22.Ng3 Not the most precise move, but to the human eye it seems much more tempting to bring the knight to f5 rather than b5. 22.Nc3!? Offering a pawn, but rather than take it Black should offer one of his own. Be6 The computer indicates that the compensation after 22...Bxf3 23.Rd2 h6 24.Bf4∞ is nebulous, but could well take on solid form soon. The key point is that Black's king cannot easily escape from its current position on f7, which is quite a weak one. 23.Nb5!? White has to continue playing with some imagination. 23.f4 Rfe8 24.f5 Bd7= is dull for Black, but also quite equal. 23...c4 23...Nd5 24.Bxe7 Nxe7 25.a4 White has some real initiative here. 24.Bf1 Rxd1+ 25.Rxd1 Rc8! I think this is probably the best way to meet the ideas of Nxa7 and Nc7. 26.Nd6+ 26.Nxa7 Rc7 27.Nb5 Rc5 28.Bxf6 Kxf6 29.a4 Rg5 Black has at least adequate compensation for the pawn. 26...Bxd6 27.Rxd6 Rc5= Black's structural advantage compensates for the bishop-pair, but there are still very good chances for the better player to win. 22...c4 23.Bf1 b5 24.a4 a6 25.axb5 axb5 26.Nf5 White recognises that if he does nothing, his split kingside pawns will cause headaches in the future. Bc5 It seems marginally more precise to me to play 26...Bb4 27.c3 Bc5 when White's queenside pawns are a bit stuck. 27.Re5 Bxf3 28.Rxd8 Caruana keeps playing for a win, but seemingly not in an appropriate set of circumstances. In another three moves it will be Black trying. 28.Bxc4+ bxc4 29.Rxd8 Rxd8 30.Rxc5 Rd5 leaves less play in the position, and it seems Black's king might be better situated for the ending. Nevertheless, I think White should do this, and Black needs to be unafraid of ghosts to play in the most accurate fashion: 31.Rc7+ Kg6! 31...Rd7 32.Rxc4 31...Nd7 32.Ne3 Rxg5 33.Rxd7+ Ke6 34.Rd4 32.Bxf6 Kxf6 33.Ne3 Rh5 34.Rxc4 g5= In principle the bishop should be better in a pawn-race situation like this, though it isn't yet 100 percent clear that Black is getting to take on h2. 28...Rxd8 29.Rxc5 Rd1+ 30.Ka2 Rxf1 31.Rxb5 c3!? One of several very interesting attempts to win that Black has now. I wondered whether Black could be greedy in this position and try 31...Rf2 which should probably not be enough for an advantage, but is worth looking at. 32.Nd6+! After the natural 32.h4?! White's piece co-ordination is so terrible that even having a passed b-pawn doesn't restore the balance. Nd5! 32...Rxc2 33.Nd4 Rf2 34.Rf5± 33.Nd6+ Ke6 34.Nxc4 Rxc2 35.Nd2 35.Ne3 Nc3+ 36.Kb3 Rxb2+ 37.Kxb2 Nxb5 White should almost definitely draw this, but it's becoming harder. 35...Be2 36.Rb7 h6 32...Ke6 33.Nf5 Be4!? 34.Nxg7+ Kf7 35.Bxf6 Rxf6 36.Nh5 Rf2= If Black really wants to have some fun he can try 31...Nd5 immediately as well: 32.Nd6+ Ke6 33.Nxc4 Rf2 34.Nd2 Be2 35.Rc5 Rxh2∞ when both sides have 2 connected passed pawns. 32.Bxf6 32.bxc3?? Bd5+ wins material. 32...Kxf6 33.Ne3 Rf2 34.Rf5+?! This natural check lands White in trouble, though he can still defend. 34.b4!? g6 35.Kb3 Rxh2 36.Kxc3 h5 37.Rb8∞ keeps both winning and losing chances. 34...Ke6 35.Ka3! The safest bail-out in this case is to accept being a pawn down. It is not certain that 35.bxc3? is mathematically lost, but White is definitely in trouble. g6! 36.Rf4 36.Rb5 Rxh2 36...Ke5 37.Ng4+ Kxf4 38.Nxf2 Bb7 35...cxb2 36.Kxb2 h5 36...Rxc2+ 37.Kxc2 Be4+ 38.Kd1 Bxf5 39.Ke2 Ke5 40.Kf3 In this version White lacks protected squares for his knight (like g5) and so there are still some things Black can try. 37.h4 Rxc2+ 38.Kxc2 Be4+ 39.Kd2 Bxf5 40.Ke2 Ke5 41.Kf3 Bd3 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F-Wang,H-½–½2020C42FIDE Candidates7

Fabiano Caruana, Wang Hao

Caruana and Wang Hao are two of four players currently on fifty percent | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE

Ding Liren ½:½ Alekseenko

Ding's woes continue in Yekaterinburg, as he is not being able to find his usual flow at the event. The Chinese star called this 'not a good game', confessing that he had missed Alekseenko's reply on move 21:

 
Ding Liren vs. Alekseenko
Position after 21.Qa4

After spending close to 45 minutes on his last three decisions, Ding found himself having to invest other 11 minutes after his opponent blitzed out 21...c5 — he had simply failed to assess this alternative adequately. Alekseenko later said he was very happy with his position at this point, but Ding quickly adjusted his play and started to find correct defensive manoeuvres to keep things under control. 

When asked to evaluate his performance so far, Ding did not hide his disappointment while referring to the fact that the tournament could be interrupted at any moment:

My play was very bad. [...] I don't know whether the tournament will end somewhere, but I hope so.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 Be7 5.Bg2 d5 6.Nf3 0-0 7.0-0 Nbd7 The main line and probably also the sharpest one is 7...c6!? intending to grab the c4-pawn soon. 8.Qc2 The most critical approach is to ditch the c4-pawn again. I updated my old analysis in what follows. 8.Nc3 c6 9.Bf4 dxc4 This is one of a few places where Black can try and make a draw with 9...Nh5 10.Bc1 Nhf6 . 10.e4 Re8 10...b5!? This move is possible, but Black needs a lot more knowledge in order to make it work. 11.d5 Qb6! 11...e5?! 12.Nxe5 Nxe5 13.Bxe5 Ng4 14.Bf4 g5 15.Bd2 b4 16.Na4 Ne5 17.a3! bxa3 18.Bc3 11...cxd5 12.exd5 Qb6 13.dxe6 fxe6 14.Nd4 12.dxc6 12.Be3?! Bc5= Matlakov,M-Grandelius,N Doha 2015 12...Nc5 13.e5 Nd5 14.Bg5 Bxg5 14...Rd8?! 15.Nxb5! is a very strange decoy tactic. 15.Nxg5 Nd3! There is no need to fear sacrificing a pawn on d5. 15...h6 16.Nge4 Nd3 17.Qh5 Qd4?! 18.Nxb5 Qxe5 19.Qxe5 Nxe5 20.Nec3 Gupta,A-Ankit,R New Delhi 2011 16.Nxd5 16.Nxh7 Kxh7 17.Qh5+ Kg8 18.Be4 g6 19.Bxg6 fxg6 20.Qxg6+ Kh8 21.Nxd5 exd5 22.Qh6+= 16.Bxd5 exd5 17.Nxd5 Qd8-+ 16...exd5 17.Bxd5 Bf5! 17...h6 18.Nxf7 Rxf7 19.a4! Black's structure is broken and so his position is harder to play. 18.a4 Nxe5! 18...Rad8 19.Qf3 Bg6 20.Nxf7 Rxf7 21.axb5 Nxe5 22.Bxf7+ Bxf7 23.Qf5± 19.Re1 Nd3 20.Qf3 Bg4!∞ The complications continue, but Black is holding his own. 11.a4 b6 12.d5!? exd5 13.exd5 Bb7! 14.a5 a6! 14...bxa5?! 15.d6 Bf8 16.Nd2 Nb6 16...Nd5?! 17.Nxd5 cxd5 18.Nxc4 Now White takes the bishop-pair. Nakamura,H-Karjakin,S Saint Louis 2018 16...Rc8! This machine-precise move is the only way, it seems, to equalise reliably. 17.Nxc4 Ba6 18.b3 Nc5= 17.Nde4 Nfd5 17...Nxe4 18.Nxe4 Nd5 19.Bg5 Qb6 20.d7 Reb8 20...Re5 21.d8Q Rxd8 22.Bxd8 Qxd8 23.Qd4 21.Qg4 Ba6 22.Nf6+ Nxf6 23.Bxf6± Zontakh,A-Grigoryan,A Legnica 2013 18.Nc5!? Nxf4 19.gxf4 Qb8 20.N3e4 Nd5 21.Qg4∞ 15.d6 Bf8 16.axb6! 16.b3?! b5! 16.Nd4 Rc8 17.axb6 Qxb6 18.Nf5∞ White's position looks easier to play, but assuming Black can get away with ...c5, this does not translate into an actual advantage. 16...Nxb6 17.b3 c5 18.bxc4= 8...c6 9.Bf4 A couple of years ago White came up with a nuance here. 9.Rc1 b6 10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Bf4 Bb7 12.Qb3!? The idea is that Black probably cannot make do without ...a6, whether or not White places his queen on a4. 12.Qa4 a6 12...Rc8! 13.Nbd2 13.Rc7!? is an exchange sacrifice that gives White quite good compensation. 13...Rc8 14.Qd1 Nh5 15.Rxc8 Bxc8 16.Rc1 Nxf4 17.gxf4 Bb7 18.e3 Qb8= Ghaem Maghami,E-Wei,Y Tashkent 2016 12...Rc8 13.Rxc8 Qxc8 14.Nc3 See my annotations to Karjakin,S-Wei,Y Tata Steel Masters 2018. 9...b6 9...Nh5 This is another place where White will have to think of something new. 10.Rd1 Ba6 11.Nbd2 Rc8 12.Rac1 Nh5 13.Be3 Nhf6 14.Bg5 White decides to play on. This move introduces ideas of e4, and Black's next move is prophylaxis against exactly that. Bb7 It isn't so clear that White is better after 14...h6 15.Bxf6 Bxf6 16.e4 Be7 , but still Black felt he was not obliged to allow e4. 15.Ne5! 15.e4 would give Black a couple of ways to equalise. c5 15...dxe4 16.Nxe4 Nxe4 17.Bxe7 Qxe7 18.Qxe4 Nf6 19.Qf4 c5 could also work, but Black should remember to take back on c5 with the pawn, and have a plan in mind in case White opts to play d5 instead and sacrifice a pawn. 15...h6 16.Bxf6 Nxf6= 16.cxd5 exd5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Bxe7 Qxe7= Playing 15.Bxf6 unprovoked is rarely clever: Bxf6 16.e4 c5 15...Nxe5!? A double-edged decision. 15...h6 16.Bxf6 Bxf6 17.f4 c5= 16.dxe5 Ng4 The text move was directed against the idea of 16...Nd7 17.Bxe7 Qxe7 18.f4 with some kind of dark-squared blockade. 17.Bxe7 Qxe7 18.Nf3 f6 After this move Black was always going to suffer for a few moves. White repays the favour before long though. 18...c5! 19.cxd5 Bxd5 19.exf6 The computer suggests the impractical 19.Qa4 Nxe5 20.Nxe5 fxe5 21.Qxa7 19...Nxf6 20.Bh3 20.Ne5 looks quite safe to me. 20...Rce8 21.Qa4!? c5 Black gets the right idea, but he could probably have sacrificed one pawn rather than two. 21...Ne4! 22.Qxa7 Qc7 23.cxd5 exd5 24.Rxd5 24.Qa3 c5 24...Nxf2! 25.Bf5 25.Kxf2?! Qe7 25...Rxf5 26.Rxf5 Nh3+ 27.Kg2 Ra8 28.Qxa8+ Bxa8 29.Kxh3 c5 22.b4?! It wasn't clear to me, while watching live, exactly what happened if White grabbed the pawn. 22.Qxa7 d4!? 22...Qc7 23.Nd4‼ Now there are some ridiculous lines, mostly involving queen sacrifices. Ra8 23...cxd4 24.cxd5 Qe7 25.d6 Qf7 26.Rc7 Nd7 27.f3 24.Nxe6 Qc6 25.cxd5 Nxd5 26.Qxb7 Qxb7 27.Nxf8 Kxf8 28.Bg2 Rd8 29.Rc3 23.Qxb6 Ne4∞ Black has very active pieces, but even so, full compensation for 2 pawns might be a slight stretch. 22...cxb4 23.Qxa7 Ne4! Alekseenko conducts this phase of the game quite well. A much riskier approach was: 23...dxc4 24.Rxc4 Nd5 25.Bxe6+ Qxe6 26.Qxb7 when Black has to find the un-intuitive line Nc3 27.Rd7 Nxe2+ 28.Kg2 Rxf3! 29.Rxg7+ Kf8 30.Rxh7 Rf7= 24.Qxb6 24.a3 bxa3 25.cxd5 exd5 26.Qxb6= 24...Nc3 25.Re1 dxc4 26.a3 Bd5 A less ambitious move, but not wrong. 26...Nxe2+ was possible, due to a resource that would only be obvious to me with hindsight: 27.Rxe2 Bxf3 28.Rxe6 Qg5 29.Rce1 Rb8! 29...Qh6?! 30.Bf1‼ 30.Qe3 Qxe3 31.R6xe3 b3‼ Black doesn't need both the queenside pawns, and the material balance isn't that important either. 32.Be6+ Kh8 33.Bxc4 b2 27.Qxb4 Qxb4 28.axb4 Nxe2+ There was no point playing 28...Na2 29.Ra1 Nxb4 30.e4 when White's better structure gives him a small advantage. 29.Rxe2 Rxf3 30.Bg2 Rff8 31.Rd2 Rb8 32.Bxd5 exd5 33.Rxd5 Rxb4 34.Rc2 White couldn't find anything better than heading for this rather equal rook ending. Rc8 35.Kf1 c3 36.Ke2 Rb7 37.Rd3 Rb2 38.Kd1 Rb1+ 39.Ke2 Rb2 40.Kd1 Rb1+ ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ding,L-Alekseenko,K-½–½2020E08FIDE Candidates7

Kirill Alekseenko

It is not at all easy to face the best in the world on a daily basis | Photo: Lennart Ootes / FIDE


Round-up shows

IM Merijn van Delft chose Vachier-Lagrave's win as the Game of the Week, while GM Simon Williams recapped the remaining encounters of the day.

Game of the Week #405 by IM Merijn van Delft

GM Simon Williams reviews the action of the day


Commentary webcast

Commentary by Evgenij Miroshnichenko and Daniil Dubov 


Standings after Round 7

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TBPerf.
1
2820
0.0
0
0.00
0
2
2791
0.0
0
0.00
0
3
2789
0.0
0
0.00
0
4
2777
0.0
0
0.00
0
5
2776
0.0
0
0.00
0
6
2763
0.0
0
0.00
0
7
2758
0.0
0
0.00
0
8
2696
0.0
0
0.00
0
TBs: Koya, Wins with black, Wins

All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Qb6 8.Qd2 Qxb2 9.Rb1 Qa3 10.e5 h6 11.Bh4 dxe5 B97: Sicilian Najdorf: Poisoned Pawn. 12.fxe5 Nfd7 is currently scoring better than 12...g5. 13.Ne4! Qxa2 The position is equal. 14.Rd1 Qd5 15.Qe3 Qxe5 Avoid the trap 15...Nxe5? 16.Nb3+- 16.c3 Bc5 White must now prevent ...f5. 17.Bg3 Qd5
18.Bc4N Predecessor: 18.Bd6 Bxd6 19.Nb5 Qxd1+ 20.Kxd1 Be5 21.Nbd6+ Ke7 22.Nc4 Rd8 23.Kc2 Bc7 24.Be2 1-0 (37) Beveridge,C (1963)-Milde,L (2075) ICCF email 2013 18...Qxc4 19.Bd6
Threatens to win with Bxc5. 19...Nf6! 20.Nxc5 Nd5 21.Qe5
21...Rg8 22.Ndxe6! fxe6 23.Nxe6 Qxc3+ 24.Qxc3 Nxc3 25.Nc7+       Double Attack Kf7 26.Rd3 Ne4 And now ...Ra7 would win. 27.0-0+ Kg6 Strongly threatening ...Ra7. 28.Nxa8 Nc6 28...Rd8= remains equal. 29.Nb6 Bf5 29.Nb6± Rd8 30.Nxc8 Rxc8 31.Ba3 Rc7 32.Rf4 Nf6 33.Bb2 Ne7 34.Bxf6 gxf6       Endgame KRR-KRN 35.h4 h5 36.Rg3+       White has strong compensation. Kf7 37.Rg5 Rc1+ 38.Kh2 Ng6 39.Rf2 Nxh4 39...Kg7 40.Rxh5 Ne5 40.Rxh5 Ng6 41.Rh7+ Ke6 42.Rxb7 Rb6+ is the strong threat. Ne5 Threatening ...Ng4+. 43.Rb6+ Rc6 44.Rxc6+ Nxc6+- KR-KN 45.Kg3 Kf7 46.Rc2 Nb4 47.Rd2 Nc6 48.Kf4 Kg6 49.Rd6 Ne5 50.Rxa6 Nf7 51.Ke4 Nh6 52.Ra5 Nf7 53.Ra3 aiming for Rg3+. Nd6+ 54.Kf4 Nf5 55.Rd3 Nh6? 55...Ne7 56.Ra3 Nc6 57.Rg3+ Kf7 56.Rg3+ Kf7 57.Ke4 Ng8 58.Kf5? 58.Rb3 Ne7 59.Ra3 58...Ne7+ 59.Kf4 Nd5+ 60.Kg4 Kg6 61.Kf3+ Kf7 62.Ke4 Ne7? 62...Nc7 63.Rc3 Ne8 63.Kf4? 63.Rc3+- has better winning chances. Ke6 64.Ra3 63...Nd5+!± 64.Kf5 Ne7+ 65.Ke4? 65.Kg4 65...Ng8!+- 66.Rh3? 66.Ra3 Ne7 67.Ra7 66...Kg6 67.Ra3 Kf7? 67...Ne7 68.Rd3 Nc6 68.Kf4 Nh6 69.Rg3 Ng8
70.Kg4! Ne7 71.Kh5 Nd5 72.Rf3 Ke6 73.g4 Ke5 74.Kg6 Weighted Error Value: White=0.21/Black=0.09
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F2820Vachier-Lagrave,M27581–02021B97FIDE Candidates 20208.1
Wang,H2763Ding,L2791½–½2021C45FIDE Candidates 20208.2
Nepomniachtchi,I2789Giri,A2776½–½2021B33FIDE Candidates 20208.3
Alekseenko,K2696Grischuk,A27771–02021C11FIDE Candidates 20208.4
Alekseenko,K2696Caruana,F2820½–½2021C54FIDE Candidates 20209.1
Grischuk,A2777Nepomniachtchi,I2789½–½2021D85FIDE Candidates 20209.2
Giri,A2776Wang,H27631–02021E05FIDE Candidates 20209.3
Ding,L2791Vachier-Lagrave,M2758½–½2021E60FIDE Candidates 20209.4
Caruana,F2820Ding,L2791½–½2021C90FIDE Candidates 202010.1
Vachier-Lagrave,M2758Giri,A2776½–½2021B33FIDE Candidates 202010.2
Wang,H2763Grischuk,A2777½–½2021C11FIDE Candidates 202010.3
Nepomniachtchi,I2789Alekseenko,K26961–02021A13FIDE Candidates 202010.4
Nepomniachtchi,I2789Caruana,F2820½–½2021C47FIDE Candidates 202011.1
Alekseenko,K2696Wang,H2763½–½2021C55FIDE Candidates 202011.2
Grischuk,A2777Vachier-Lagrave,M27581–02021B23FIDE Candidates 202011.3
Giri,A2776Ding,L27911–02021C85FIDE Candidates 202011.4
Caruana,F2820Giri,A27760–12021B45FIDE Candidates 202012.1
Ding,L2791Grischuk,A27771–02021D37FIDE Candidates 202012.2
Vachier-Lagrave,M2758Alekseenko,K26961–02021B12FIDE Candidates 202012.3
Wang,H2763Nepomniachtchi,I27890–12021C01FIDE Candidates 202012.4
Wang,H2763Caruana,F28200–12021B22FIDE Candidates 202013.1
Nepomniachtchi,I2789Vachier-Lagrave,M2758½–½2021A50FIDE Candidates 202013.2
Alekseenko,K2696Ding,L27910–12021C54FIDE Candidates 202013.3
Grischuk,A2777Giri,A27761–02021E16FIDE Candidates 202013.4
Caruana,F2820Grischuk,A2777½–½2021B45FIDE Candidates 202014.1
Giri,A2776Alekseenko,K26960–12021E16FIDE Candidates 202014.2
Ding,L2791Nepomniachtchi,I27891–02021E60FIDE Candidates 202014.3
Vachier-Lagrave,M2758Wang,H27631–02021C67FIDE Candidates 202014.4

Links


Carlos Colodro is a Hispanic Philologist from Bolivia. He works as a freelance translator and writer since 2012. A lot of his work is done in chess-related texts, as the game is one of his biggest interests, along with literature and music.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.