Biel: Georgiadis lets Navara off the hook

by André Schulz
7/31/2018 – The fighting chess continues in Biel. Despite all games finishing in draws, we enjoyed three very interesting clashes on the eighth round. Svidler used an advanced passed pawn to draw Carlsen, Vachier-Lagrave and Mamedyarov explored an old variation in the Open Defence, while Georgiadis missed sharp tactics that could have given him the win against Navara. MIKHAIL GOLUBEV provided a thorough analysis of each game. | Photos: Lennart Ootes / Simon Bohnenblust / Biel International Chess Festival

Chess News


Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.

Exciting but not decisive

After seven rounds, the Accentus Biel GM Tournament did not have Carlsen at the top but Mamedyarov. They both had Black on Monday — Svidler was Magnus' rival, while Shakhriyar played against Vachier-Lagrave.

Magnus is one point behind Mamedyarov with two rounds to go | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Biel International Chess Festival

In their first encounter, Carlsen tried a sharp variation against Svidler's Najdorf, but at the end could not get the full point. In the return game, the World Champion was looking for more than a draw despite having the black pieces. He chose the Open Defence against his opponent's 1.e4, and the position soon turned into an Anti-Berlin with 4.d3. After 14 moves, three pairs of minor pieces already had been exchanged.

 
Svidler - Carlsen
Position after 14...cxb6

Svidler continued with 15.O-O and Carlsen castled on the opposite flank a few moves later. The Norwegian opened the h-file, but the material was too scarce for there to be a real attack. Svidler got a d-pawn as counterplay and pushed it all the way to d7. Black's heavy pieces were too busy guarding the passer to create enough play, so the game ended in a draw after 36 moves.

Mikhail Golubev looked at some practical chances that Black could have used to create more problems to his opponent:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.Bxc6 dxc6 6.Nbd2 This is the most common move, but no less than five other options also have been tried in the opponents' practice. Be6 Instead, 6...Bg4 7.h3 Bh5 had been played by Carlsen in his 2013 world championship match against Anand. 7.Qe2!? Nd7 8.Nb3 Introduced by Caruana in a game against Navara in 2013. Bb6!? 9.Ng5 Nf8!? 10.Be3N In Caruana-Nakamura, Internet blitz 2017 there was 10.0-0 Bxb3 11.axb3 f6 12.Nf3 Ne6 , transposing also to Caruana-Kramnik, Leuven blitz 2016. There is also 10.Nxe6 Nxe6= 10...Qe7 Engines suggest 10...Bd7!? , planning ...Ng6. 11.g3 Probably more accurate is 11.Nxe6 Nxe6 12.Qh5 11...Bxb3!? 12.axb3 f6 13.Nf3 Ne6 14.Bxb6 cxb6 15.0-0 a6! Instead of the banal 15...0-0, Carlsen prepares the long castle. 16.c3 Maybe 16.Qe3!? was worth trying. 16...0-0-0 If White would not have prepared d4 now, Black could get some attacking prospects on the kingside. 17.Rad1 Kb8 18.Qe3 Ka7 A true magic. The black king is completely safe on the queenside. Black gradually gained some chances from what seemed to be a completely equal position. 19.d4 exd4 20.Nxd4 After 20.cxd4?! Rhe8 White's pawns are vulnerable. 20...Nxd4 21.Rxd4 h5!? 22.Rfd1!? Rxd4 23.cxd4 After 23.Rxd4 Black plays h4 or 23...Qe6 24.b4 h4 23...h4 24.d5 A serious alternative was 24.g4 but also there some initiative is with Black. 24...hxg3 25.hxg3 Qe5 Curious is 25...cxd5!? 26.exd5 26.Rxd5 g5! 26...Qxe3 27.fxe3 Kb8! though I am not sure that Black has any significant winning chances after 28.d6!? 26.Qf3 Not 26.dxc6?? Qh5!-+ 26...cxd5 27.exd5 Qxb2?! Here 27...Rd8! 28.Qd3 Qxb2 29.d6 Qe5 if 29...Rd7 , White plays 30.Qf5! Qxb3 31.Qxd7 Qxd1+ 32.Kg2= with the inevitable draw, because the d6-pawn is too dangerous 30.d7 Qe6 was a better practical chance: Black plans to play, approximately, ...Qc6, b5, b6, Kb7 at some point threatening with ...Rh8, or .. .a5-a4. At least, White would have had to work for a draw. 28.d6! Rd8 29.d7 Qc2 Now White uses the opportunity to place his rook actively, equalizing. 30.Rd6! Qc5 31.Qd1!= Qf5 32.Rd5 Qe4 33.Rd4 Qc6 34.Rd6 Qe4 35.Rd4 Qc6 36.Rd6 Qe4 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Svidler,P2753Carlsen,M2842½–½2018C65ACCENTUS Biel GMT8.2

MVL recovered from a bad start in Switzerland | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Biel International Chess Festival

Another Open Variation was seen in the game that faced Vachier-Lagrave against Mamedyarov. Until the fifteenth move, the players followed a Klaus Durga - Bent Larsen game from 1953. The old masters were even younger than the players in Biel when they explored this position, as they were participating in the U20 World Championship.

 
Vachier-Lagrave - Mamedyarov
Position after 15...Qd6

Vachier-Lagrave continued with 16.Ng3, which deviated from Darga's 16.Ng5 — the German player defeated Larsen in that game. After 16...h6 17.Qe1 Mamedyarov could have followed with an immediate 17...e4, but chose 17...Bg4 instead. Black gained the initiative, but later had to deal with White's pair of bishops.

The tactical skirmish that followed was analysed in-depth by Golubev:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 In Carlsen-Mamedyarov (Round 5) White preferred 5.d3 5...Nxe4 The Open Variation (or Open Defense) is used by a number of the world's best players. 6.d4 b5 7.Bb3 d5! 8.dxe5 Be6 9.c3 Another popular move 9.Nbd2 had been played in Navara-Mamedyarov, Round 2. 9...Bc5 It's normal at the top level to change lines all the time. The main alternative 9...Be7 was used by Mamedyarov against Carlsen in Stavanger earlier this year. 10.Nbd2 0-0 11.Bc2 This important theoretical position, known since the end of the 19th century, seemingly, occurs in the serious practice of both opponents for the first time. Nxf2!? Two other well-known moves are 11...f5 and 11...Bf5 12.Rxf2 f6 13.Nf1 White deviates from the main, more principled line 13.exf6 Bxf2+ weaker is 13...Qxf6?! 14.Qf1! Smyslov-Botvinnik, Moscow 1943 14.Kxf2 Qxf6 15.Nf1 or 15.Kg1 Rae8 15...Ne5 16.Be3 Rae8 13...Bxf2+ 14.Kxf2 fxe5 15.Kg1 White has B + N for Black's R + 2P; he is just a bit more active but Black is solid and, on the whole, chances are more or less equal. Qd6!? One of the good options. 16.Ng3? After 16.Ng5 Bf5! 17.Bxf5 17.Bb3?! Ne7 18.Ne3 Rad8! was better for Black in Darga-Larsen, World U20-ch Copenhagen 1953 17...Rxf5 18.Qd3 e4 19.Qh3 Qg6 20.Ng3 Rf6 21.Nh5 , normally, it's only Black, who, if wishes, can avoid the repetition and try to play for a win. White can be advised to play 16.Be3= Or maybe 16.a4 (as in S.Zamora-K.Pecotic, IECG 2004) 16...h6? Quite unpleasant for White would have been 16...Bg4! with the idea of 17.Bxh7+ Kh8! naturally, not 17...Kxh7? 18.Ng5+ 18.Bc2? Qc5+ 19.Kh1 Qf2! 17.Qe1 White could have played 17.Be3!? and if Bg4 18.h3 Bxf3 19.gxf3 ∆e4!? 20.f4 but if Vachier-Lagrave decided that this line looks too risky, it's easy to understand. 17...Bg4?! Engines suggest 17...e4! 18.Nd4 Nxd4 19.cxd4 c5! 20.Be3 c4! claiming that Black is better. Still, maybe it's not too dramatic for White after, say, 21.Qa5 18.Nh4! e4!? 19.h3! Bd7 20.Be3! Qf6 The attempt to win a knight by 20...g5? fails to 21.Nxe4! dxe4 22.Rd1± Qf6 23.Rxd7 , etc. A playable, even if uninspiring, alternative was 20...Ne7!? 21.Rd1 Qc6 and if 22.Bb3 Kh7 23.Bc2 Kg8 , repeating. 21.Nh5! Qe5 After 21...Qf7!? 22.Nf4 Black has to defend passively by Ne7! if 22...g5? 23.Nxd5!± 22.Nf4 More critical was 22.g4! Rf7 23.Rd1 23.Bb3!? 23...Ne7 with interesting play. Which is, possibly, more interesting for White. 22...Rxf4‼ A pretty combination saves Black. 23.Ng6 Rf1+! 24.Kxf1 If 24.Qxf1? Qg3! , regaining a piece. 24...Qf5+ 25.Nf4 g5 26.Qg3! Kh7 And Black will emerge with an extra pawn. But White's activity will provide enough resources for the first player. 27.Ke2!? gxf4 28.Qxf4! Qxf4 29.Bxf4 Rg8 30.Kf2 Or 30.g4!? h5 31.Rh1! 30...Rf8 31.Ke3! Ne7 32.Bxc7! Nf5+ 33.Ke2 b4 34.Bf4!? bxc3 35.bxc3 Nh4 36.g3! Ng2 37.c4! Nxf4+ 38.gxf4 Rc8 39.Rd1 Rxc4 40.Bb3 Ba4 41.Rxd5 Bxb3 42.axb3 Rc3 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Mamedyarov,S2801½–½2018C82ACCENTUS Biel GMT8.1

Looking for the win... | Photo: Lennart Ootes / Biel International Chess Festival

The last game to finish had a very different nature. Against Georgiadis' Nimzo-Indian, Navara chose a setup with a knight on e5 reinforced by a pawn on f4, a system used often by the Czech player.

 
Navara - Georgiadis
Position after 11.Ne2

In this position, Black can follow either with 11...cxd4 or 11...c4. The Swiss grandmaster chose 11...cxd4, and the players started fighting for the central squares. However, at some point, Navara established his bishop in the awkward a7-square. This gave Georgiadis the initiative, as White's pieces are clearly less coordinated.

 
Position after 29...Bc6

Navara tried to defend the a7-bishop tactically with 30.Rxe4 dxe4 31.Bc4, but Black can play 31...Rxa7 anyway. Navara attacked the rook with 32.Qc5, threatening 33.Bxe6. With 32...Rd7 or 32...Ra4, Nico would have kept a clear advantage, but he went for 32...Rc7 and got himself in trouble on the c-file after 33.Rc1. White recovered the material and the game was drawn after 51 moves.

The curious battle was scrutinised by Mikhail Golubev:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 Nf6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Bd3 b6 7.0-0 Bb7 An old, solid variation of the Nimzo-Indian. 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Ne5 In the past, 9.a3 Bd6 10.b4 had occurred a number of games in Navara's practice, with both colors. 9...Nbd7 A curious game Peralta-Navara, FRA-ChT Mulhouse 2011 continued 9...Bd6 10.f4 c5 11.Qf3 11.g4!? 11...Nc6 12.Qh3 h6 13.Rf3 13.g4!? 13...cxd4 14.exd4 Nxd4 15.Rg3 Kh8 16.f5 Bxe5 17.Rxg7 Kxg7 18.Qxh6+ Kg8 19.Qg5+ Kh8 20.Qh6+ Kg8 21.Qg5+ 1/2 10.f4 After 10.Qa4 Black can play Nxe5! 11.dxe5 Bxc3 12.bxc3 Ne4= rather than 12...Nd7?! 13.Ba3! c5 14.f4 Furman-Antoshin, Rostov 1953 10...c5 Probably also playable is 10...Bxc3 11.bxc3 c5 , as in Piket-Illescas, Wijk aan Zee 1997 11.Ne2 Otherwise: 11.Rf3 Ne4!= Tolush-Antoshin, USSR Ch (Leningrad) 1956 11.Bd2 Ne4 12.Rc1 Rc8 13.Be1!? with approximately equal chances was I.Kovalenko-Georgiadis, Riga 2015 11...cxd4 11...c4 is a more principled move. 12.Bf5!? g6 13.Qa4?! gxf5! 14.Qxb4 Ne4 15.a4 f6 16.Nf3 Nb8! 17.Qe1 Nc6 was quite good for Black in Caruana-Adams, Wijk aan Zee 2016. 12.exd4 With a certain even if slight initiative for White. Bd6!? 13.Ng3 Two noteworthy alternatives were 13.Qa4!? and 13.Bf5!? 13...Ne4! 14.Nf5 Ndf6 15.Qf3 Instead, 15.g4!? makes sense, where Rc8!? 16.g5 Ne8 was tried in Avotins-Sanchez Ródenas, ICCF 2017 While the exchange 15.Nxd6 also can be considered by White 15...Bc7?! Better was 15...Bc8! 16.Ne3 Bb7 16.Be3?! Also unconvincing is 16.Qh3 Bc8 17.g4 Bxf5 18.gxf5 But 16.Bxe4! dxe4 16...Nxe4?! 17.Qg4 g6 18.Nh6+ Kg7 19.f5 17.Qg3 g6 18.Be3! and if Nh5 19.Qg4 would have been hard to meet. White's main idea is Kh8 20.Nh6 followed by f5!. 16...Nd6!? 17.Rac1! Nfe4? Tempting but wrong, 18.Nxd6? After 18.Nxg7! Kxg7 19.f5 White's attack brings him decent winning chances. For example, 19.Qh5!? 19...f6 20.Qg4+ or maybe 20.Qh5 fxe5 21.f6+ Rxf6 22.Bxe4 dxe4 23.Rxf6 Qxf6 24.Rxc7+ Nf7 25.Rxb7 exd4 26.Qg4+! Kf8 27.Bd2 Qg6 28.Rxf7+! Kxf7 29.Qd7+ Kf6 30.Qc6+ Ke5 31.Qxa8 e3 32.Be1 Qb1 33.Qe8+± 20.Qh3!? 20...Kh8 21.Ng6+ hxg6 22.Rf3! Qe7 23.Qxg6 Qg7 or 23...Rf7 24.Rh3+ Rh7 25.Rxh7+ Qxh7 26.Qxh7+ Kxh7 27.Rxc7+ Kg8 28.Bxe4! dxe4 29.Bf4 24.Rxc7 Rf7 if 24...Qxg6 25.fxg6 Kg8 26.Bh6! 25.Rh3+ Kg8 26.Rxf7 Nxf7 27.Rh7! Qxg6 28.fxg6 Nfd6 if 28...Nd8 29.Bh6! 29.Bxe4 dxe4 30.Bf4 e3 31.Bxd6 18...Bxd6= Now Black is OK. 19.f5 Rc8 20.Rce1 f6 21.Ng6 Re8 Indeed, not 21...hxg6? 22.fxg6 Re8 23.Qh3+- 22.Nf4 He could have tried 22.Qh5!? Qd7 23.Nf4 Bxf4 24.Rxf4 though this isn't a problem for Black. 22...Bxf4! 23.Bxf4 A bit more accurate is 23.Qxf4 23...Qd7! Black attack the f5 pawn, and it's easy to see that he already developed some initiative. 24.Qd1?! Perhaps, the passive 24.Be3 had to be preferred. 24...Qxf5 25.Bb8 Bizarre. But if 25.Bb5 Bc6! 26.Ba6 Ra8! and White has no compensation for a pawn. 25...Qe6 26.Bxa7? White has regained a pawn, but his bishop is in a desperate situation. Ra8?! Quite good was 26...Qd6 ∆27.Qb3 Re6 or maybe Black can go for 27...Nd2 28.Rxe8+ Rxe8 29.Qxb6 Qxb6 30.Bxb6 Nxf1 31.Kxf1 and 26...Red8 ∆27.Qb3 Rd6 27.Qb3! Qf7! 28.Qxb6?! The best defense was 28.Rf4! f5 28...Rxa7 29.Rfxe4 ∆dxe4? 30.Bc4 29.Bxe4 Rxe4 30.Rexe4 dxe4 31.Qxf7+ Kxf7 32.Bxb6 though also here it's Black who's better after Bc8! 28...Re6 29.Qa5 Bc6! 30.Rxe4?! Objectively, White had to go for 30.Bxe4 dxe4 31.d5 Re5! 30...dxe4 31.Bc4 Rxa7 32.Qc5 Rc7? Missing 32...Rd7!-+ with a point 33.d5 Qh5! 34.Qxc6 Rxc6 35.dxc6+ Rf7 36.b4 Qe5 33.Rc1! e3 34.b4? Correct was 34.d5! Bxd5 35.Qxd5 Kh8 36.Re1 Rxc4 37.Qxc4 with good chances for a draw. 34...e2! 35.Re1 Kh8?! A more or less clearly winning opportunity was 35...Rc8! 36.Rxe2 36.d5 Re4! 36...Bd7-+ 36.b5!? Qe7? Here again Black had a good chance: 36...Bxb5! 37.Qxb5 Qe8! where, I suspect, he should be winning in the long run. 37.Bxe6! Qxc5 38.dxc5 Bxb5= And this interesting game ended in a draw. 39.Bg4 Rxc5 40.Bxe2 Ba4 41.Rb1 g6 42.Rb4 Rc2 43.Bd1 Rc1 44.Rxa4 Rxd1+ 45.Kf2 Rd2+ 46.Kf3 Kg7 47.Ra7+ Kh6 48.a4 Ra2 49.a5 Kg5 50.a6 h5 51.Ra8 Kf5 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Navara,D2741Georgiadis,N2526½–½2018E52ACCENTUS Biel GMT8.3

Rustam Kasimdzhanov, the FIDE World Champion in 2004, has been extremely successful with the Nimzo-Indian with 4.Qc2 with White and with Black. In over 4 hours of video, Rustam Kasimdzhanov explains all the important ideas, strategies and tricks helped by sample games in which the white side is represented, e.g., by Kasparov, Anand, Kramnik and Ivanchuk as well as the author himself.

Commentary of Round 8

Commentary by GM Daniel King and IM Anna Rudolf

Current standings

Rk.NameRtg.Nt.Pts.n
1
2
3
4
5
6
TBPerf.
1
2801
6.0
8
18.00
2904
2
2842
5.0
8
19.25
2829
3
2753
4.5
8
13.75
2773
4
2779
4.0
8
15.00
2757
5
2741
3.5
8
11.25
2691
6
2526
1.0
8
4.25
2454
TBs: Sonneborn-Berger

All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 d5 3.c4 e6 4.Bg5 Bb4+ 5.Nc3 h6 6.Bxf6 Qxf6 7.e3 0-0 8.Rc1 dxc4 9.Bxc4 c5 D38: Queen's Gambit Declined: Ragozin Defence (4 Nf3 Bb4) 10.dxc5 Nd7 11.0-0 LiveBook: 3 Games Nxc5 The position is equal. 12.Nb5 a6 13.Nbd4
13...b5N Predecessor: 13...Ba5 14.a3 Bb6 15.b4 Ne4 16.Qd3 Ng5 17.Nxg5 hxg5 1-0 (36) Salem,A (2638)-Peralta,F (2556) Sitges 2017 14.Be2 e5 15.Nc2 15.a3 is more complex. exd4 16.Nxd4 Ne6 17.axb4 Rd8 18.Bf3 15...Rd8 16.Nxb4 Rxd1 17.Rfxd1 a5 18.Nd5 Qd6 19.Nxe5 Bb7 20.Bf3 Rc8 21.Ng4 Qf8 22.h4 Nd7 With the idea ...Rxc1. 23.Rxc8 Bxc8 24.a3 h5 25.Nh2 g6 26.Be2 Ne5 27.Bxb5 Bb7 28.Nc3 Qe7 29.Rd4 Qe6 30.Nf1 Qb3 31.Rd2 Nc4 32.Rd7 Bxc4 is the strong threat. Nxb2 33.Rxb7 Qxc3 34.Be8 Kf8 35.Bxf7 Qc6 36.Rxb2 Kxf7=       Endgame KQ-KRN 37.Rd2! Qa4 38.Rd3 Qxh4 39.Rd7+ Kg8 40.Rd4! Qe7 41.a4 Qa3 42.g3 Qa1 43.Kg2 g5 44.Nd2 g4 45.Ne4 Qc1 46.Nf6+ Kf7 47.Nxh5 Qc6+ 48.Kg1 Threatens to win with Rf4+. Qc1+ 49.Kh2 Kg6! 50.Nf4+ Kf6 51.Ng2 Kg5 52.Rf4 Qd1 53.Nh4 Hoping for Rf5+. Qc2 54.Nf5 Qd3 55.e4       Qd7?      
55...Qd1!= and Black has nothing to worry. 56.e5!+- Qh7+ 57.Kg1 aiming for e6. Qg6
58.Nd6! Qe6? 58...Qb1+ 59.Kh2 Qc1 59.Rf5+ Qxf5 60.Nxf5 Kxf5 61.f4 Kg2 would kill now. gxf3 62.Kf2 Kxe5 63.Kxf3 Kf5 64.Ke3 Precision: White = 75%, Black = 65%.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2842Navara,D27411–02018D30ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20181
Mamedyarov,S2801Georgiadis,N25261–02018A15ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20181
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Svidler,P2753½–½2018C84ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20181
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Carlsen,M28420–12018B07ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20182
Svidler,P2753Georgiadis,N25261–02018B51ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20182
Navara,D2741Mamedyarov,S2801½–½2018C80ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20182
Carlsen,M2842Svidler,P2753½–½2018B94ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20183
Mamedyarov,S2801Vachier-Lagrave,M27791–02018A04ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20183
Georgiadis,N2526Navara,D27410–12018E62ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20183
Mamedyarov,S2801Svidler,P2753½–½2018D71ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20184
Navara,D2741Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2018D85ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20184
Georgiadis,N2526Carlsen,M2842½–½2018C17ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20184
Carlsen,M2842Mamedyarov,S2801½–½2018C77ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20185
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Georgiadis,N25261–02018A18ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20185
Svidler,P2753Navara,D2741½–½2018A28ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20185
Svidler,P2753Vachier-Lagrave,M27790–12018A34ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20186
Navara,D2741Carlsen,M2842½–½2018D41ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20186
Georgiadis,N2526Mamedyarov,S28010–12018B92ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20186
Carlsen,M2842Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2018B90ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20187
Mamedyarov,S2801Navara,D27411–02018E10ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20187
Georgiadis,N2526Svidler,P27530–12018B90ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20187
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Mamedyarov,S2801½–½2018C82ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20188
Svidler,P2753Carlsen,M2842½–½2018C65ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20188
Navara,D2741Georgiadis,N2526½–½2018E52ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20188
Mamedyarov,S2801Carlsen,M28421–02018E65ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20189
Navara,D2741Svidler,P2753½–½2018A33ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20189
Georgiadis,N2526Vachier-Lagrave,M2779½–½2018D71ACCENTUS Biel GMT 20189
Carlsen,M2842Georgiadis,N25261–02018A00ACCENTUS Biel GMT 201810
Vachier-Lagrave,M2779Navara,D27411–02018C50ACCENTUS Biel GMT 201810
Svidler,P2753Mamedyarov,S2801½–½2018A18ACCENTUS Biel GMT 201810

Translation from German and additional reporting: Antonio Pereira

Links


André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.