World Problem Solving Championship 2011 – Solutions

by ChessBase
9/26/2011 – In his report on the competition, which was won by 19-year-old Kacper Piorun, the second-placed solver, GM Dr John Nunn, presented a selection of problems which the competitors had to face. Today he presents the solutions, in the unique explanatory style that has made his many chess books so popular. Studying his notes allows you to delve into the magical world of chess problems.

ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024 ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024

It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.


World Problem Solving Championship 2011 – Solutions

By John Nunn

Slobodan Mladenovic
4th Honourable Mention, Probleemblad 1987

White to play and mate in two moves

If it were Black to move, then White would be able to mate at once. For example, 1...f3 allows 2 g4#, a bishop move is met by 2 Re5#, and a move by one of the pieces surrounding the white queen allows the queen to mate at b1, e4 or h7. So Black is already in zugzwang and White only needs a waiting move to solve the problem. However, that would be too simple (it is a world championship, after all). A quick check shows that there is no viable waiting move, for example 1 Bg7? and 1 Re7? block the queen’s path to h7.

The solution involves disrupting, at least to some extent, the pre-existing mates. I found the key by noting that three of the mates (Qb1, Re5 and Qh7) cover the e4-square, and so it might be possible to release White’s guard on that square yet still preserve at least some of the mates. This suggests a move by the c3-knight, and noticing that 1...Ke4 could then be met by 2 Bg6# only reinforced the feeling that this is the correct path. Where should the knight move? One problem is that after 1...f3, the reply 2 g4 is no longer mate, so there has to be a substitute mate in this line. A natural idea is to replace the pawn mate by 2 Ng3#, but for this to work White’s first move must cover f4. This immediately leads to the key 1 Nd5!, which also substitutes 1...Rd6 2 Ne7# for the earlier mate by Qe4. The other mates stay the same: 1...Nb6 moves 2 Qb1#, 1...Nc7 moves 2 Qh7# and 1...B moves 2 Re5#. [Click to replay]

Rafael Kofman, 2nd Honourable Mention,
Shakhmaty v SSSR TT 1947-48 (version)

White to play and mate in three moves

The line-up of pawns on Black’s second rank suggests that his defence to White’s threat will be to move one of the pawns, threatening a check on the second move. Therefore, it’s reasonable to see if there are any mates prepared for these pawn moves. After 1...c5, White has the attractive 2 Rd3+ exd3 3 e4#, which must surely be one of the variations. There are also mates prepared for 1...dxe6 (by 2 Nf7 followed by Nf6#) and 1...d6 (by 2 Bg7 followed by 3 Ne3#, the choice of square for the bishop being determined by the need to prevent a black check).

However, there is no mate prepared for 1...c6. Thus we are looking for a key which does two things: makes a threat, and prepares a mate in reply to 1...c6. In fact there aren’t many moves which set up a threat, as the three white pieces on the kingside are all needed to stop Black’s king escaping. True, 1 b4 threatens the immediate 2 Bb3#, but this is unlikely to be the key as 1...d6 and 1...dxe6 don’t stop the threat, and a quick check shows that 1...c5 is an adequate defence. A bit of imagination is necessary to find the key 1 Bb5!, which threatens 2 Bd3! exd3 3 e4#. The only defences are the moves of the c- and d-pawns, and the key prepares a mate after 1...c6, namely 2 Bc4+ Kc5 3 Nxe4#. The other variations work exactly as before: 1...c5 2 Rd3+ exd3 3 e4#, 1...dxe6 2 Nf7 and 1...d6 2 Bg7. [Click to replay]

Mircea Manolescu
1st Prize, Buletin Problemistic 1998-9

Helpmate in 5 moves (2 solutions)

Remember that Black moves first! This tough problem defeated most of the competitors in the World Solving Championship. In a helpmate, spotting the mating position is usually the key step, working out how to get there is usually less difficult. The trouble here is that the mating position is not at all obvious, since there are many possibilities. It’s reasonable to suppose that the white king will not be involved, since the composer has made a big effort to keep it out with a wall of black pawns.

Let’s start with the simplest assumption, that the black king is mated on its current square, e6. One possible mating position has the white knight on f7 and bishop on c4, with d7, e7, f6 and f5 blocked by black pieces. Indeed, by playing ...Bd7, ...Re7 and ...Qd4-f6 this can be arranged with one black move left over. White’s knight can reach f7 in three moves, so White also has one spare move. Unfortunately, the spare moves (one white and one black) are not enough to arrange this mate, as two black pieces are controlling c4 and cannot be removed in time. However, even this negative result is helpful, as we now know why the knight on b2 and rook on c2 are on the board, to prevent an unintended solution. This suggests that perhaps these pieces won’t play an active role in the solution. It’s not an absolute guarantee, since a clever composer will often use pieces for multiple purposes, but at any rate we shouldn’t be surprised if the knight and rook don’t take part in the actual mates.

OK, so how about reversing the direction of the mate and having the white knight on d5 and bishop on g8, with d7, d6, e5 and f5 blocked? Black’s pieces can easily block these squares in five moves and the white knight takes only one move to reach d5, but there’s a problem getting the bishop to g8. The mating move must be Bh7-g8# and the only way the bishop can reach g8 in four moves is to take the f5-pawn, which destroys the mate. So again we are out of luck.

It seems that mating the king on e6 doesn’t work, so how about other nearby squares? Assuming the general mating pattern is correct, d5 is tempting because one square is already blocked by the c4-pawn and the queen can block d4 or c5 in one move. So let’s suppose that White’s knight is on e4 and bishop on b7. This can be arranged in four moves, leaving one spare. Black’s moves can be ...Kd5, ...Qd4, ...Re7-e5 and ...Be6 in some order. This looks promising, so how about the actual order of moves? ...Kd5 isn’t possible yet, so Black’s first move must be ...Re7 or ...Qd4. The white knight doesn’t have many routes to reach e4 without checking the black king, and Nd3-f2 (or c5)-e4 looks much the most promising. At first it seems that several move-orders should be possible, so let’s try one and see what the problem is. So let’s play 1 Qd4 (Black’s moves are written first in helpmate solutions) Nd3 2 Kd5 Nf2 3 Re7 Ne4 4 Re5 and now we can see a problem. White needs a pass move, to be followed by Black’s ...Be6, but there is no pass move. A knight cannot lose a move, and the white king has no moves, so the pass move must be supplied by the bishop. This means that Bc8 must be the pass move, but of course White must not take the bishop, as this would ruin the mate. This explains why the move-order is unique, since Black must get his bishop to e6 as soon as possible to allow the pass move Bc8 by White. The bishop can only move to e6 after the rook has moved to e5, so the solution is 1 Re7 Nd3 2 Kd5 Nc5 (f2 is still blocked, so the knight must go this way) 3 Re5 Ne4 4 Be6 Bc8 5 Qd4 Bb7#.

We have the first solution, and must look for the second. In helpmates with multiple solutions, there is usually a link between the solutions. Here is where imagination comes in, since the exact nature of the link is not clear. However, recall our earlier idea when we tried to swap round the positions of the two pieces in the mate. Could the same thing happen here, with the bishop and knight moving to opposite sides of the black king? The most likely arrangement would be the white knight on c6 and the bishop on f3. This looks promising as the knight only takes one move to reach c6, leaving four for the bishop to get to f3. Black needs five moves to block the other squares by ...Kd5, ...Rd7 (or f6)-d6, ...Be6 and ...Qc5. This leaves two questions; how the bishop reaches f3 in four moves, and the move-order. It’s clear that Bxc4 is not viable, as this destroys the mate, and Bc8xf5-g4-f3 is not possible as the black bishop is in the way, which only leaves Bb5-e8-h5xf3. This route means that the earliest white can play his knight to c6 is on move 3, and only then can the black king go to d5, so Black’s last two moves must be ...Kd5 and ...Be6. Thus the rook and queen must move to d6 and c5 respectively on the first three moves, forcing the rook to travel via d7. As 1 Qc5 Bb5 2 Rd7 blocks Be8, the order must be 1 Rd7 Bb5 2 Rd6 Be8 3 Qc5 Nc6 4 Kd5 Bh5 5 Be6 Bxf3#. There’s no white waiting move in this solution, but it’s still remarkable that the move-order should be uniquely determined in both solutions. [Click to replay]

Viktor Chepizhny and Valentin F. Rudenko, 3rd Prize,
M.Vukcevich-60 Jubilee Tourney, StrateGems2000 (version)

White to play and mate in six moves

Where does one start in a position like this? The first point to note is that the a3-rook is covering a mate on g3 and the g1-bishop is covering a mate on c5. These lines cross at e3 and at first sight the solution might appear to involve a white piece landing on e3. However, the only piece that can move there is the bishop, but after Be3 Black can play ...Kxe3.

Let’s play a game of what if. What if Black was somehow forced to play his rook or bishop to e3? It’s certainly possible to imagine this could happen, since both moves give the black king a flight at f4, and this might be the only way to defeat White’s threat. Imagine it’s Black to move and he plays 1...Be3. Can White mate then? The obvious continuation is 2 Nxg3+ Kf4 3 Nh5+ Ke4. If this were to be a variation, White would have to mate in three more moves. A quick check shows that this can be achieved by an attractive double sacrifice: 4 Bf3+! (thanks to the black bishop on e3, Black cannot take this with his rook) 4...Nxf3 (4...gxf3 is the same) 5 Nc5+! Bxc5 6 Ng3#. So now what if 1...Re3? Then 2 Nc5+ Kf4 leads to the analogous line 3 Rd4+! exd4 (3... e4 4 Nd3#) 4 Nd3+ Ke4 5 Nxg3+! Rxg3 6 Nc5#.

These two lines must surely be the main point of the problem, but there remains the question of the key and threat. White doesn’t actually have many pieces which aren’t occupied with important duties, and although 1 Bd1 threatens mate on c2, the reply 1...Nxg2 destroys any hope of mate. The only real prospect for a threat is to retreat the rook to d7 or d8, so as to make way for a check on d6. It looks as though 1 Rd8 is the more plausible move, threatening 2 Nd6+ Kd4 3 Nxf5+ Kc5 4 Rc8+ and mate next move. However, after 1...Nb6 or 1...Nc7 the threat is defeated, and then there is no mate in the required number of moves.

The solution is to play 1 Rd7, which has the neat threat 2 Nd6+ Kd4 3 Nf7+! Kc5 (3...Ke4 4 Ng5#) 4 Nd8 (intending Nb7#) 4...Rd3 5 Bxd3 followed by Nb7#, in which the white knight makes a complete circuit via d6, f7 and d8 to end up back at b7. The only defences to this threat are the moves to e3, and then White mates as in the variations given above: 1...Be3 2 Nxg3+ Kf4 3 Nh5+ Ke4 4 Bf3+ gxf3 (or 4...Nxf3) 5 Nc5+ Bxc5 6 Ng3# and 1...Re3 2 Nc5+ Kf4 3 Rd4+ exd4 4 Nd3+ Ke4 5 Nxg3+ Rxg3 6 Nc5#. [Click to replay]

Gerald F. Anderson
4th Prize, The Problemist 1970-1

White to play and selfmate in three moves

The line-up of black pieces on the first rank suggests that White will mate himself by forcing the black knight to move, discovering mate from the rook. The only plausible way to compel the knight to move is to play bxc3+, but at the moment this doesn’t work because the white rook can interpose on b1. Therefore one might consider a move such as 1 Ra6, threatening 2 bxc3+, but the problem is that Black can reply 1...Bxc5, so as to recapture with the king on c3. Still, the line-up of the bishop on c5 and the king on g1 suggests that in this case a different type of mate might be possible. 2 Ng4+ Kc4 3 Nxe3+ is certainly an idea, but unfortunately Black need not take the knight but can simply move his king to the b-file. That is a consequence of 1 Ra6?, and a quick check shows that the 2 Ng4+ and 3 Nxe3+ line is already prepared for 1...Bxc5, only provided the white rook stays on the b-file. But without moving this rook, how does White create a threat?

At this point an imaginative step is necessary. How about if Black is in zugzwang after the key? This idea is reinforced if one notices that 1...Na6/c6 can be met by 2 Rb4+ Nxb4 3 bxc3+ Nxc3#. The key must cope with 1...cxb2, for which there is currently no obvious reply, and moves of the bishop to squares other than c5.

Let’s look at 1...cxb2 first. Then 2 c3+ would force Black to mate. except for the unfortunate fact that the white bishop can interpose on b1. This is a hint that the key must provide a method of destroying the bishop’s guard of b1 on move 2, so as to allow c3+ on move 3. This leads to the idea of 1 Bh7!, which provides the line 1...cxb2 2 Ng6+! Be5 3 c3+ Nxc3#. But wait a moment! Doesn’t the bishop move to h7 release the guard on d5 in the line 1...Bxc5 2 Ng4+? Yes, it does, but it doesn’t matter because whether the black king moves to c4 or d5, 3 Nxe3+ still forces the knight to be taken. All this clearly indicates that we are on the right track, so it only remains to cope with the other moves of the black bishop. Most moves are met by 2 Rd6+! Bxd6 3 bxc3+ Nxc3#, but 1....Bxe5 cunningly defends against this by self-pinning the bishop so that playing the rook to d6 mates Black. This move leads to the nicest variation of the whole problem, because by immobilising his own bishop Black allows the beautiful move 2 Rg6!, which cuts off the bishop’s guard of b1 in a different way, and threatens 3 bxc3+. The only defence is 2...cxb2, and then 3 c3+ leads to the usual mate. To summarise, the lines are:

1...Na6/c6 2 Rb4+ Nxb4 3 bxc3+ Nxc3#
1...Bc7/e7/f8 2 Rd6+ Bxd6 3 bxc3+ Nxc3#
1...cxb2 2 Ng6+ Be5 3 c3+ Nxc3#
1...Bxc5 2 Ng4+ Kc4/d5 3 Nxe3+ Bxe3#
1...Bxe5 2 Rg6!
(threat 3 c3+) 2...cxb2 3 c3+ Nxc3# [Click to replay]

If you would like to try solving the other problems from the World Championship, a complete set may be found here, while the solutions are here (both files in PDF). If you are interested in problems, try one of the following:

Now the obligatory detour into the world of astronomy. The following images were taken with telescopes at GRAS (Global-Rent-a-Scope), an organisation which offers top-quality telescopes for hire at various locations around the world. You can click on them to see larger versions.

The Iris Nebula lies about 1,300 light-years away in the constellation of Cepheus. It consists of a cloud of dust and gas illuminated from within by a bright star. It appears blue because the dust in the cloud, which is about six light-years across, scatters blue light better than other wavelengths (a similar process creates the blue sky on Earth).

This image shows part of the Gamma Cygni nebula, which is a huge area of nebulosity in the direction of the bright star Gamma Cygni (also known as Sadr). Gamma Cygni, the bright star to lower left in this image, is only 1,500 light-years away, and so cannot be physically connected to the nebula, which lies at twice the distance. The nebula is a huge gas cloud and it is emitting the pinkish light typical of excited hydrogen gas.

Please note that there will be an astronomy presentation by Dr John Nunn and Dr Christian Sasse during the London Chess Classic in December. We hope that Vishy Anand, who is also a avid user of GRAS, will look in and show us some of the images he has recorded with Dr Sasse's remote telescopes.

Copyright Nunn/ChessBase

Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register