11/23/2018 – The tenth game of the 2018 World Championship match in London was a highly tense affair. Fabiano Caruana surprised his opponent in the opening, but in the asymmetrical position that followed Magnus Carlsen seemed to have better chances. The Challenger, however, defended stubbornly and, in the endgame, Carlsen was a little too optimistic, lost a pawn, and nonetheless managed to secure a draw. The game was analysed by current U.S. champion SAM SHANKLAND and by ERWIN L'AMI. | Photos: Nikolai Dunaevsky / World Chess
Chess Festival Prague 2025 with analyses by Aravindh, Giri, Gurel, Navara and others. ‘Special’: 27 highly entertaining miniatures. Opening videos by Werle, King and Ris. 10 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and much more. ChessBase Magazine offers first-class training material for club players and professionals! World-class players analyse their brilliant games and explain the ideas behind the moves. Opening specialists present the latest trends in opening theory and exciting ideas for your repertoire. Master trainers in tactics, strategy and endgames show you the tricks and techniques you need to be a successful tournament player! Available as a direct download (incl. booklet as pdf file) or booklet with download key by post. Included in delivery: ChessBase Magazine #225 as “ChessBase Book” for iPad, tablet, Mac etc.!
Winning starts with what you know The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
Doesn’t every chess game get decided by mistakes? Absolutely. But most players never truly comprehend that they are making the same kind of mistakes over and over again.
€36.90
Five Sicilians
It has been two weeks since the start of the 2018 World Championship match and all the games have remarkably ended in draws...but we have seen some fighting chess. Magnus Carlsen had a great chance in game one, but Fabiano Caruana also found himself in very favourable positions later in the match.
For the mainstream media the fact that no decisive games have taken place might look like this has been a dull encounter, but for chess grandmasters these two players have shown great technical skills. As Robert Hübner said, "The players are not there to entertain the spectators, but to reach the highest possible sporting result". It is true, nevertheless, that a little more show would certainly help the popularisation of the game, but anyway the interest shown worldwide for this "mind competition" is remarkable.
The match has been portrayed in the biggest media outlets "on page one". And, on Thursday, the players gave everybody much to talk about, as the game was very exciting.
The press has paid a lot of attention to the match
The Challenger received the "advantage" of playing two Whites in the last three games, but this cannot be clearly seen as favourable, given the fact that the player with Black has been getting better positions throughout the match. On the other hand, the trend seems to be changing sides, as the last two games saw White getting better chances.
While Carlsen has played different opening moves (1.d4, 1.c4 and 1.e4), Caruana has remained faithful to moving the king's pawn first — and the World Champion has bravely gone for the Sicilian in all games. Nothing to reproach there, in terms of fighting spirit.
A repertoire of attacking lines against the four major defences to 1.e4 – that is, 1...e5, the Sicilian, the French, and the Caro Kann. These systems will put your opponent under pressure, and when players are under pressure, mistakes occur. This is a practical repertoire – if we study openings we want to be sure to use them in our games.
GM Daniel King provides a 6-minute look at the main events of the day:
Chaos on the board
Game ten saw Caruana launching a move that caught Carlsen by surprise in the previously explored Sveshnikov variation — he used a Bayonet Attack on the queenside with 12.b4. This variation gives Black the chance to expand on the kingside, inviting Magnus to build a direct attack against the king.
Vishy Anand, while giving some commentaries about the game, said about this move:
I think [Carlsen] had checked Bd2 again, but somehow b4 slipped his mind. [...] I feel Black is OK now, but it’s still very sharp.
The former World Champion, who actually faced Carlsen twice under similar circumstances, mentioned that he thought Fabi's white games were fascinating, while Carlsen's preparation with White has not impressed him.
Another Sveshnikov
A critical moment arrived in move 23, when Carlsen gave up a pawn on the queenside:
The Sveshnikov Variation of the Sicilian Defence is considered one of the most promising replies to 1.e4, often giving rise to sharp and complex positions which require precise and inventive play from both sides. Thus, an opening tailor-made for Alexei Shirov (FIDE World Cup finalist in 2007), who has included it into his repertoire with both White and Black and knows the mutual tricks and traps all too well.
Caruana vs. Carlsen - Game 10
Position after 23...Qg5
Caruana did not dare to capture the pawn with 24.Bxb5. Anand said he would have captured "for specific reasons" as, "I would believe I'm not lost here and then I'm a pawn up". Instead of taking, Caruana went for 24.g3 and gave Black the opportunity to permanently threaten an attack against the weakened g2-square, as Carlsen shortly afterwards established a pawn on f3. Anand still preferred Caruana's position:
I like White more, even after g3, I like White…We shouldn’t forget that Black is attacking with one piece right now. Those bishops are very very far away from doing anything.
The queens were exchanged and, right before the time control was reached, the game turned into a double-rook endgame with Black having a strong central pawn chain:
Position after 38...Rc8
The asymmetrical position still offered a lot of play for both sides. Black had activated his king and his position was visually more attractive, but the super-computer Sesse still considered the position to be completely equal.
There was no lack of excitement in game ten
In an attempt to go for active play, Carlsen was a little too optimistic and lost a pawn, but he managed to convince his opponent that there was nothing to play for in the rook endgame with 3 v 2 on one flank. After 54 moves, the draw was signed in the following position:
Final position
It was definitely a chaotic game. Anand was proven right when the game finished, as he had stated, "I don’t think Magnus likes chaos…but he’s such a good calculator that he’ll probably cope. He’ll probably cope better than he thinks". Nonetheless, the Indian also made an important remark when he said that Magnus "is not someone who likes risk for risk's sake".
Only two classical games are left. Will we see the first World Championship match to end with all the classical games drawn? We will find out by Monday...
The continuous stream of new ideas in the Sicilian makes 1..c5 the most popular answer to 1.e4. On this DVD I do give an introduction to the most important Sicilian systems.
Game 10 analysed by Sam Shankland
Current U.S. champion Sam Shankland examined the game and thought both contenders could have taken the first full point of the match:
There were plenty of games where one side did not make the most of their chances, but this has been the only one where I thought both players at some point had very real winning chances.
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Players
Position not in LiveBook
Please, wait...
The 10th game of the World Championship match was the most back and forth
affair of any game thus far. There were plenty of games where one side did not
make the most of their chances, but this has been the only one where I thought
both players at some point had very real winning chances.1.e4c52.Nf3Nc6Magnus stays true to his Rossolimo/Sveshnikov repertoire for the 5th time in
a row. Starting from game 5, I have expected him to pivot every single game,
and been wrong every single time. Perhaps he will just play this the whole way
through?3.d4Caruana eschews Bb5, which he chose in his first 3 White
games.cxd44.Nxd4Nf65.Nc3e56.Ndb5d67.Nd5I was a bit surprised to
see Caruana enter the same line as game 8. Even though he got an excellent
position in that game, he had to figure Magnus would have come with
improvements, and the line is supposed to be okay for Black.7.Bg5Leads
to the mainline Sveshnikov.7...Nxd58.exd5Nb89.a4Be710.Be20-011.0-0Nd712.b4!?The first major deviation. Caruana chose Bd2 in the
previous game. Still, the move does not look too impressive to me.12.Bd2
Carlsen misplayed the position and quickly ended up worse.12...a613.Na3a5!?A very commital decision, but not a bad one. Magnus forces the
queenside open right away, a fearless decision against a prepared opponent,
but he had other options.13...b6Appeals the most to me. Black tries to
keep the queenside closed and will look for his own counterplay with f7-f5. In
fact, I actually prefer Black in a practical game here.14.bxa5Rxa515.Nc4Ra816.Be3Caruana was still playing very fast. He probably was in his
preparation.f5!Black absolutely needs counterplay, and f5-f4 is coming.
However, unlike game 8, here White cannot comfortabll play f2-f4 himself to
keep his kingside secure.17.a517.f4Black is absolutely fine afterexf418.Bxf4Nb618...g5!?If Black is in a feisty mood17...f4!18.Bb6Qe8The battle lines are drawn. White clearly has an edge on the queenside,
Black's pieces (particularly the c8-bishop and d7-knight) look a little clumsy,
and the b6 square could prove to be a problem. But Black's kingside pawn mass
promises him decent counterplay.19.Ra3A not so mysterious rook move. It
looks pointless now but Black's plan is clearly to launch a kingside attack,
and the rook will be a good defender laterally along the third rank.19.Re1This is the computer's recommendation by a wide margin, but I don't really
understand the move? I guess it just serves as some vague prophylaxis against
e5-e4. It claims white is better but I am unconvinced because afterRf6!
Black is ready to challenge the b6-bishop via Be7-d8.19...Qg620.Bc7e4!Carlsen is in burn the bridges mode. His pawns are vulnerable and could
quickly fall if the center were to open at an inopportune moment, but he is
looking for direct counterplay against White's king, truly in the style of the
Sveshnikov.20...Ra6A quiet defensive move like this one was surely fine,
but I think the World Champion was right to go for it.20...b5!?It was
also possible to play in the same manner as the game, only without committing
to e5-e4. This could make some sense as the central pawns proved weak.21.Nb621.axb6?It's possible this move annoyed Magnus since e5-e4 no longer
works, but it is also insufficient.Rxa322.Nxa3The problem is here Black
needs a new attacking plan since e5-e4 fails to bring its desired returns.Nc5!The b-pawn is well under control, and most importantly, White's pieces are
totally unprepared to defend his king. How will the c7-bishop ever contribute
to a proper defense? Rf6-h6 is coming and Black should win.22...e423.Bh5!Qg524.Qg4!White is doing well. Getting his queen to g4 will really
lesse any attacking chances Black can hope for21...Nxb622.Bxb6This
leads to a similar position to the game, but Black does not need to play e5-e4
if he so desires. For instance, he seems to have a good position afterb423.Rb3Bf5!When it is clear there are reasons the pawn is good on e5 as well.21.Kh1b5!?A very commital move, but not a bad one.21...Qh6The
machines prefer a slower buildup with something like this. Black certainly
will have attacking chances by lifting the f8-rook, but I don't mind Magnus's
decision either.22.Nb6!22.axb6?This would be asking for trouble.
I find it unlikely White will survive after the energeticRxa323.Nxa3f3!24.gxf3Ne5!Black's attack looks devastating.22...Nxb623.Bxb6Qg5?!Technically, this move loses the game against best play, but it comes with a
very nasty idea of playing Rf6-h6 and delivering mate on the h-file. A machine
with its nerves of steel would have no trouble grabbing h5, but for a human,
it looks absurdly dangerous.24.g3Caruana's move makes a lot of sense.
Taking on f4 and bringing the rook to g3 should dispel any mating dreams.24.Bxb5!White could have gotten away with this.Rf6Extreme precision is
needed to beat back the attack, but it is possible.25.Re1!An important
move. White hits the e4-pawn while simultaneously clearing f1 for the bishop.Bf525...Rh626.Rxe425...Rg626.Bf1Bf526...Ba627.Rxe4!+-27.a6Rh628.a7Qh429.h3f3This loks absolutely terrifying for a human, but
apparently White wins with another only move:30.Qd4!+-The point is to
defend against the threat of Bxh3 followed by Qg4.Bxh331.gxh3Qg432.Rxf3!No more exf3 thanks to the pin exerted by the queen being on d4. AfterQxf3+33.Bg2The a-pawn will carry the day. One certainly cannot fault
Caruana for not seeing all of this.26.f3!e327.a6Rh628.Re2‼
An incredibly difficult only move that would have to have been prepared in
advance. White is ready to play Qg1 and hold the position together. Even then,
the variation continues.Qh529.Qg1Bh430.g4!fxg331.Raxe3!White
wins. But this is really just a machine line, and outside of human capability.24...b425.Rb325.gxf4I would have been tempted to clear the 3rd rank
for defensive purposes, and this probably is an easier route to equality.
Still, while Caruana's choice gives him some only moves to find, he did find
the moves and he objectively was not worse.25...Bh326.Rg1!The rook
is needed for defensive purposes.26.Re1Bf6!Moves like Bc3 or Be5
could come next. White is in trouble.26...f3White is under a lot of
pressure. Around here I thought Caruana might crack and give Magnus the first
decisive result, but he defended very well.27.Bf1!This is a tough move.
I would have been tempted to just let the bishop stay on h3, since White can
always sacrifice an exchange on g2 very happily and otherwise it's not clear
what active role the bishop plays. But it was absolutely critical to play Bf1.27.Bb5?A move like this looks sensible...Rf6!Until you realize
White will simply be mated on the h-file! Rh6 and Qh5 is coming, and there is
nothing to be done.27...Bxf1!27...Qh5Caveman play does not work
here since White is in better shape to keep the h-file under control. The
queen coming to f1 is very important, for instance after28.Rxb4Rf629.Bxh3Qxh330.Be3!Black will not get Rh6 very easily, and e4 is hanging to boot.
White should win.28.Qxf1!Another important decision. White cannot
allow a disaster on the h-file. His position looks awful with the queen and
the rook so passively placed and the d5-pawn falling, but he remains solid and
can rely on the a5-pawn for counterplay.28.Rxf1?Keeping active pieces
comes at a heavy price. AfterQg4!29.Rxb4Rf5!White will promptly be
mated by Rh5 and Qh3.28...Qxd529.Rxb4Qe630.Rb5=The position is
dynamically balanced, but White has to be more careful than Black. He managed
without a ton of trouble.Bd831.Qe1!The queen returns to life.Bxb632.axb6Rab833.Qe3Qc434.Rb2Rb735.Rd1Qe2!Setting a devilish trap,
though it is not enough to claim an advantage.36.Re1!Far from the only
holding move, but I am awarding an exclamation point for not falling for
Black's idea.36.Qb3+?Kh837.c4Looks like it traps Black's queen. But
the nasty responseRxb6!-+Would promptly turn the tables!36...Qxe337.Rxe3d5The position is balanced as neither side can easily mobilize
their pawn majority. Black's center looks impressive, but he can't do anything
with it so long as he is left with a passive rook on b7.38.h4Rc839.Ra3Kf740.Kh2Ke641.g4Rc642.Ra6Ke543.Kg3h644.h5The position is some
kind of mutual stalemate where neither side can do anything. Magnus tried to
make something happen withKd4?But only made trouble for himself after
the strong response45.Rb5!When Black has to be somewhat accurate to not
get into trouble. Still, he has more than one route to a draw, and Magnus
found a very easy one.Rd6!Overprotecting the d5-pawn White was planning
to harass with Raa5.46.Ra4+Ke547.Rab4Ke6Nice and easy. White has no
good way to challenge Black's central pawn mass without allowing liquidation.48.c4dxc449.Rxc4Rdxb650.Rxe4+Kf751.Rf5+Rf6Black loses a pawn but
simplifies into an easily drawn 3 vs 2 on the kingside. Caruana did not even
bother trying. His winning chances are approximately zero.52.Rxf6+Kxf653.Kxf3Kf754.Kg3With only 2 games to go, each player has only one game to
try with White. Carlsen gets to go first, and I'll be interested to see what
first move he chooses, as well as if we will see a 6th 2.Nf3 Nc6 Sicilian in
the final game.
"My answer to this is to take, on the one side, the draw percentage of the Champions Showdown and, on the other side, the respective draw percentages in the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament in Rapid and in Blitz. The two competitions were played in the same period ; the player weren't the same, but their levels were rather similar, and the number of games quite important in one and the other event.
In the Champions Showdown, the draw percentage was 42 % (cf. https://en.chessbase.com/post/champions-showdown-improving-the-format).
In the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament, in Blitz, the draw percentage was 41 % (https://en.chessbase.com/post/saint-louis-rapid-and-blitz-day-5-2018) ; in Rapid, it was 53 % (https://en.chessbase.com/post/saint-louis-rapid-blitz-day-3). Calculating with the Blitz / Rapid ratio of the Champions Showdown (70 blitz games and 30 rapid games), this would give a 45 % draw percentage.
So, on the one hand, we have a draw rate of 42 % at the Champions Showdown ; on the other hand, calculated with the percentages of the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament, a similar competition to the Champions Showdown but in traditional chess would give a 45 % draw rate.
In my opinion, a difference of 3 % between the draw rate in Chess960 and traditional chess is more or less negligible, so I think that our working hypothesis seems in fact to be that to use Chess960 in lieu of traditional chess more or less doesn't change anything in terms of draw rate. My impression is that you didn't fully take into account the difference in defensive level between an amateur (even a very good amateur - for example a 2200 player) and a 2700+ GM : these players really KNOW how to force a draw, and, even in Chess960, they don't lose much more frequently than in traditional chess..."
Petrarlsen 11/24/2018 07:18
@ Abraxas79 (1/2): About the comparative draw rates in traditional chess and Chess960, I will simply repost (in my next post, as this post would be too long otherwise) an excerpt of one of my previous posts (taken out of a discussion about the World Championship format on this page :https://en.chessbase.com/post/world-championship-out-of-the-box#discuss).
Petrarlsen 11/24/2018 03:33
@ Abraxas79:
Do you know that, in the Chess960's "Champion Showdown" in Saint Louis, the draw rate was approximately the same as in a comparable traditional chess' tournament? I haven't the time for the moment to check it, but I have precise numbers for this...
Abraxas79 11/24/2018 01:56
The game is played out. 16, 18 or 24 games would only mean more draws. The format needs to change to Chess960. Kill the opening theory and memorization and get back to playing chess.
Timothy Chow 11/24/2018 06:01
I was really hoping to see 24.Bxb5 in Game 10. I wonder if a longer time control or more games in the match would have made Caruana more willing to risk 24.Bxb5. If so then I think that that would be a good argument for changing the format of the World Championship. But maybe it's just a matter of personal style, and that's just how Caruana plays. I think someone like Korchnoi would have played 24.Bxb5 or maybe even 22.axb6 no matter what the format.
benedictralph 11/24/2018 01:32
@Pichy59: I was wondering the same thing.
Petrarlsen 11/23/2018 09:28
And globally, I must say that, personally, I find this match very interesting; the games are drawn, but this doesn't prevent them from having a quit rich chess content...
Petrarlsen 11/23/2018 09:26
It seems to me rather obvious that this match shows that a 12-games match isn't enough, in view of the incredible level of defense displayed by some of the top-players, like Carlsen and Caruana. And, furthermore, Carlsen himself explained in the press conference that he think that 16 or 18 games should be better.
I think also that the problem of the present format is that 12 draws is rather OK for the two participants, because, then, there is another match, with rapid time controls.
The simplest solution was what have been used for many World Championships of the past (including all the Kasparov - Karpov matches, apart from the infamous 1984 match): in case of a drawn match, the Champion keeps his title; as this solution always seems to be quite popular, judging by the comments on the pages about the World Championship format, this would seem to be a good solution to this problem. But other solutions are also possible...
It seems that in at least some of the Kasparov - Karpov matches, in case of a drawn match, the prize fund was divided equally between the two participants; I rather think that this is something positive, as the result of the match itself would be the same for the two players, so it seems to me rather logical that they would win the same monetary prize...
Joe Boronka 11/23/2018 08:47
I actually think it has been a great match , Both players fight hard , trying to squeese out a win, Both Fabi and Magnus are not pulling punches and playing safe, but trying hard every time, to win their games ,, the presuure now must be fantastic on each player , so nerves will be tight , who-ever blinks first will lose ...
Joe Boronka 11/23/2018 08:42
Hoping it does not go to Blitz or Rapid , I like the idea of extenting to 16 games as Carlsen suggests , more hard fought games at Classic time controls would be great for us chess enthusiasts :) (y) <3 Joseph
Pichy59 11/23/2018 05:43
Some people here and on the World want to see either GM Caruana or GM Carlsen win a least 1 of the 12 games, but when games are played without too many blunders it usually ends up in a draw, but that does NOT take away the fact that both played excellent chess, usually when one side win is because the other blunder or take the bait without seeing the consequences:
Copy this website and see what I mean these games are of the most high level of any World chess championship see the beauty and complication of each moves on game 10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=141&v=vVuIYcSxiG8
Pichy59 11/23/2018 04:46
My suggestion is that if the game end up in a draw the next day they should start the same game again from move 10 but with reverse color and improve on the previous day's mistake, but if it end up in a draw the second time then a new opening should be selected and so on and on. Some people might say well you know that in the 2nd game which will start with the same opening but with reverse colors they will go home with a computer and do some home preparation, so WHAT both will have the same opportunity to make home preparation with Komodo or SF latest version.
fixpont 11/23/2018 02:13
I dont see problem in time control, the problem is, nobody has won a single game yet, so there is no winning necessity on any side therefore they are playing safely and nobody takes any risk at all. Imbalance is always good for the match.
Werewolf 11/23/2018 01:36
Yeah let's speed up the time control so the World Chess Championship is just a blitz match. Actually let's make it bullet chess.
Then let's reduce the number of games to 4 so the public don't get bored.
*rollseyes*
RayLopez 11/23/2018 11:29
Along the lines of what BeFreeBusy says, the match for classical should be 24 games, or, dare I say it, "first to six wins". Sadly, it seems the 2018 WCC classical format will be decided either on blitz or rapid.
psamant 11/23/2018 10:15
@Eightxeight There are several chess tournaments for the general public to follow. Let the world chess championship be for people who are truly interested in chess. Because of the time available, we get to see a lot of deep diving into chess openings ... The Rossolimo and Sveshnivok here... and we see how these players evaluate middle game and end game positions. Lesser time means tactics hold sway without any deep plans.
BeFreeBusy 11/23/2018 09:50
Ah the "general public" argument. Well, who cares about it?! Chess is for chess players, while the public is rather stupid about it. There`s always tic-tac-toe.
Eightxeight 11/23/2018 08:26
The matches time limit needs to reduced to 40/90, for the general public the game is too slow and drawish
Ruy Lopez Powerbase 2025 is a database and contains a total of 12092 games from Mega 2025 and the Correspondence Database 2024, of which 1276 are annotated.
In this 60 Minutes, Andrew Martin guides you through all the key ideas you need to know to play with confidence. Whether you’re looking to surprise your opponents, or simply want a straightforward weapon against e5, the Centre Attack has you covered.
Videos by Mihail Marin: Najdorf Variation with 6.f4 and Nico Zwirs: Italian ‘giucco pianissimo’. ‘Lucky bag’ with 45 analyses by Edouard, Ftacnik, Gupta, Pelletier and others. Update service with over 50,000 new games for your database!
This video course provides a comprehensive and practical White repertoire in the Ruy Lopez! Through instructive model games and in-depth theoretical explanations, you will learn how to confidently handle both main lines and sidelines.
Chess Festival Prague 2025 with analyses by Aravindh, Giri, Gurel, Navara and others. ‘Special’: 27 highly entertaining miniatures. Opening videos by Werle, King and Ris. 10 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and much more.
€21.90
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.