World Championship Game 10: Double-edged

by André Schulz
11/23/2018 – The tenth game of the 2018 World Championship match in London was a highly tense affair. Fabiano Caruana surprised his opponent in the opening, but in the asymmetrical position that followed Magnus Carlsen seemed to have better chances. The Challenger, however, defended stubbornly and, in the endgame, Carlsen was a little too optimistic, lost a pawn, and nonetheless managed to secure a draw. The game was analysed by current U.S. champion SAM SHANKLAND and by ERWIN L'AMI. | Photos: Nikolai Dunaevsky / World Chess

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Five Sicilians

It has been two weeks since the start of the 2018 World Championship match and all the games have remarkably ended in draws...but we have seen some fighting chess. Magnus Carlsen had a great chance in game one, but Fabiano Caruana also found himself in very favourable positions later in the match. 

For the mainstream media the fact that no decisive games have taken place might look like this has been a dull encounter, but for chess grandmasters these two players have shown great technical skills. As Robert Hübner said, "The players are not there to entertain the spectators, but to reach the highest possible sporting result". It is true, nevertheless, that a little more show would certainly help the popularisation of the game, but anyway the interest shown worldwide for this "mind competition" is remarkable.

The match has been portrayed in the biggest media outlets "on page one". And, on Thursday, the players gave everybody much to talk about, as the game was very exciting.

The press has paid a lot of attention to the match

The Challenger received the "advantage" of playing two Whites in the last three games, but this cannot be clearly seen as favourable, given the fact that the player with Black has been getting better positions throughout the match. On the other hand, the trend seems to be changing sides, as the last two games saw White getting better chances.

While Carlsen has played different opening moves (1.d4, 1.c4 and 1.e4), Caruana has remained faithful to moving the king's pawn first — and the World Champion has bravely gone for the Sicilian in all games. Nothing to reproach there, in terms of fighting spirit.

Another 1.e4 by Fabiano


Game 10 summary

GM Daniel King provides a 6-minute look at the main events of the day:


Chaos on the board

Game ten saw Caruana launching a move that caught Carlsen by surprise in the previously explored Sveshnikov variation — he used a Bayonet Attack on the queenside with 12.b4. This variation gives Black the chance to expand on the kingside, inviting Magnus to build a direct attack against the king.

Vishy Anand, while giving some commentaries about the game, said about this move:

I think [Carlsen] had checked Bd2 again, but somehow b4 slipped his mind. [...] I feel Black is OK now, but it’s still very sharp.

The former World Champion, who actually faced Carlsen twice under similar circumstances, mentioned that he thought Fabi's white games were fascinating, while Carlsen's preparation with White has not impressed him.

Another Sveshnikov

A critical moment arrived in move 23, when Carlsen gave up a pawn on the queenside:

 
Caruana vs. Carlsen - Game 10
Position after 23...Qg5

Caruana did not dare to capture the pawn with 24.Bxb5. Anand said he would have captured "for specific reasons" as, "I would believe I'm not lost here and then I'm a pawn up". Instead of taking, Caruana went for 24.g3 and gave Black the opportunity to permanently threaten an attack against the weakened g2-square, as Carlsen shortly afterwards established a pawn on f3. Anand still preferred Caruana's position:

I like White more, even after g3, I like White…We shouldn’t forget that Black is attacking with one piece right now. Those bishops are very very far away from doing anything.

The queens were exchanged and, right before the time control was reached, the game turned into a double-rook endgame with Black having a strong central pawn chain:

 
Position after 38...Rc8

The asymmetrical position still offered a lot of play for both sides. Black had activated his king and his position was visually more attractive, but the super-computer Sesse still considered the position to be completely equal.

There was no lack of excitement in game ten

In an attempt to go for active play, Carlsen was a little too optimistic and lost a pawn, but he managed to convince his opponent that there was nothing to play for in the rook endgame with 3 v 2 on one flank. After 54 moves, the draw was signed in the following position:

 
Final position

It was definitely a chaotic game. Anand was proven right when the game finished, as he had stated, "I don’t think Magnus likes chaos…but he’s such a good calculator that he’ll probably cope. He’ll probably cope better than he thinks". Nonetheless, the Indian also made an important remark when he said that Magnus "is not someone who likes risk for risk's sake".

Only two classical games are left. Will we see the first World Championship match to end with all the classical games drawn? We will find out by Monday...


Match standings

Loading Table...

Game 10 press conference


Game 10 analysed by Sam Shankland

Current U.S. champion Sam Shankland examined the game and thought both contenders could have taken the first full point of the match: 

There were plenty of games where one side did not make the most of their chances, but this has been the only one where I thought both players at some point had very real winning chances.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
The 10th game of the World Championship match was the most back and forth affair of any game thus far. There were plenty of games where one side did not make the most of their chances, but this has been the only one where I thought both players at some point had very real winning chances. 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 Magnus stays true to his Rossolimo/Sveshnikov repertoire for the 5th time in a row. Starting from game 5, I have expected him to pivot every single game, and been wrong every single time. Perhaps he will just play this the whole way through? 3.d4 Caruana eschews Bb5, which he chose in his first 3 White games. cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 e5 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Nd5 I was a bit surprised to see Caruana enter the same line as game 8. Even though he got an excellent position in that game, he had to figure Magnus would have come with improvements, and the line is supposed to be okay for Black. 7.Bg5 Leads to the mainline Sveshnikov. 7...Nxd5 8.exd5 Nb8 9.a4 Be7 10.Be2 0-0 11.0-0 Nd7 12.b4!? The first major deviation. Caruana chose Bd2 in the previous game. Still, the move does not look too impressive to me. 12.Bd2 Carlsen misplayed the position and quickly ended up worse. 12...a6 13.Na3 a5!? A very commital decision, but not a bad one. Magnus forces the queenside open right away, a fearless decision against a prepared opponent, but he had other options. 13...b6 Appeals the most to me. Black tries to keep the queenside closed and will look for his own counterplay with f7-f5. In fact, I actually prefer Black in a practical game here. 14.bxa5 Rxa5 15.Nc4 Ra8 16.Be3 Caruana was still playing very fast. He probably was in his preparation. f5! Black absolutely needs counterplay, and f5-f4 is coming. However, unlike game 8, here White cannot comfortabll play f2-f4 himself to keep his kingside secure. 17.a5 17.f4 Black is absolutely fine after exf4 18.Bxf4 Nb6 18...g5!? If Black is in a feisty mood 17...f4! 18.Bb6 Qe8 The battle lines are drawn. White clearly has an edge on the queenside, Black's pieces (particularly the c8-bishop and d7-knight) look a little clumsy, and the b6 square could prove to be a problem. But Black's kingside pawn mass promises him decent counterplay. 19.Ra3 A not so mysterious rook move. It looks pointless now but Black's plan is clearly to launch a kingside attack, and the rook will be a good defender laterally along the third rank. 19.Re1 This is the computer's recommendation by a wide margin, but I don't really understand the move? I guess it just serves as some vague prophylaxis against e5-e4. It claims white is better but I am unconvinced because after Rf6! Black is ready to challenge the b6-bishop via Be7-d8. 19...Qg6 20.Bc7 e4! Carlsen is in burn the bridges mode. His pawns are vulnerable and could quickly fall if the center were to open at an inopportune moment, but he is looking for direct counterplay against White's king, truly in the style of the Sveshnikov. 20...Ra6 A quiet defensive move like this one was surely fine, but I think the World Champion was right to go for it. 20...b5!? It was also possible to play in the same manner as the game, only without committing to e5-e4. This could make some sense as the central pawns proved weak. 21.Nb6 21.axb6? It's possible this move annoyed Magnus since e5-e4 no longer works, but it is also insufficient. Rxa3 22.Nxa3 The problem is here Black needs a new attacking plan since e5-e4 fails to bring its desired returns. Nc5! The b-pawn is well under control, and most importantly, White's pieces are totally unprepared to defend his king. How will the c7-bishop ever contribute to a proper defense? Rf6-h6 is coming and Black should win. 22...e4 23.Bh5! Qg5 24.Qg4! White is doing well. Getting his queen to g4 will really lesse any attacking chances Black can hope for 21...Nxb6 22.Bxb6 This leads to a similar position to the game, but Black does not need to play e5-e4 if he so desires. For instance, he seems to have a good position after b4 23.Rb3 Bf5! When it is clear there are reasons the pawn is good on e5 as well. 21.Kh1 b5!? A very commital move, but not a bad one. 21...Qh6 The machines prefer a slower buildup with something like this. Black certainly will have attacking chances by lifting the f8-rook, but I don't mind Magnus's decision either. 22.Nb6! 22.axb6? This would be asking for trouble. I find it unlikely White will survive after the energetic Rxa3 23.Nxa3 f3! 24.gxf3 Ne5! Black's attack looks devastating. 22...Nxb6 23.Bxb6 Qg5?! Technically, this move loses the game against best play, but it comes with a very nasty idea of playing Rf6-h6 and delivering mate on the h-file. A machine with its nerves of steel would have no trouble grabbing h5, but for a human, it looks absurdly dangerous. 24.g3 Caruana's move makes a lot of sense. Taking on f4 and bringing the rook to g3 should dispel any mating dreams. 24.Bxb5! White could have gotten away with this. Rf6 Extreme precision is needed to beat back the attack, but it is possible. 25.Re1! An important move. White hits the e4-pawn while simultaneously clearing f1 for the bishop. Bf5 25...Rh6 26.Rxe4 25...Rg6 26.Bf1 Bf5 26...Ba6 27.Rxe4!+- 27.a6 Rh6 28.a7 Qh4 29.h3 f3 This loks absolutely terrifying for a human, but apparently White wins with another only move: 30.Qd4!+- The point is to defend against the threat of Bxh3 followed by Qg4. Bxh3 31.gxh3 Qg4 32.Rxf3! No more exf3 thanks to the pin exerted by the queen being on d4. After Qxf3+ 33.Bg2 The a-pawn will carry the day. One certainly cannot fault Caruana for not seeing all of this. 26.f3! e3 27.a6 Rh6 28.Re2‼ An incredibly difficult only move that would have to have been prepared in advance. White is ready to play Qg1 and hold the position together. Even then, the variation continues. Qh5 29.Qg1 Bh4 30.g4! fxg3 31.Raxe3! White wins. But this is really just a machine line, and outside of human capability. 24...b4 25.Rb3 25.gxf4 I would have been tempted to clear the 3rd rank for defensive purposes, and this probably is an easier route to equality. Still, while Caruana's choice gives him some only moves to find, he did find the moves and he objectively was not worse. 25...Bh3 26.Rg1! The rook is needed for defensive purposes. 26.Re1 Bf6! Moves like Bc3 or Be5 could come next. White is in trouble. 26...f3 White is under a lot of pressure. Around here I thought Caruana might crack and give Magnus the first decisive result, but he defended very well. 27.Bf1! This is a tough move. I would have been tempted to just let the bishop stay on h3, since White can always sacrifice an exchange on g2 very happily and otherwise it's not clear what active role the bishop plays. But it was absolutely critical to play Bf1. 27.Bb5? A move like this looks sensible... Rf6! Until you realize White will simply be mated on the h-file! Rh6 and Qh5 is coming, and there is nothing to be done. 27...Bxf1! 27...Qh5 Caveman play does not work here since White is in better shape to keep the h-file under control. The queen coming to f1 is very important, for instance after 28.Rxb4 Rf6 29.Bxh3 Qxh3 30.Be3! Black will not get Rh6 very easily, and e4 is hanging to boot. White should win. 28.Qxf1! Another important decision. White cannot allow a disaster on the h-file. His position looks awful with the queen and the rook so passively placed and the d5-pawn falling, but he remains solid and can rely on the a5-pawn for counterplay. 28.Rxf1? Keeping active pieces comes at a heavy price. After Qg4! 29.Rxb4 Rf5! White will promptly be mated by Rh5 and Qh3. 28...Qxd5 29.Rxb4 Qe6 30.Rb5= The position is dynamically balanced, but White has to be more careful than Black. He managed without a ton of trouble. Bd8 31.Qe1! The queen returns to life. Bxb6 32.axb6 Rab8 33.Qe3 Qc4 34.Rb2 Rb7 35.Rd1 Qe2! Setting a devilish trap, though it is not enough to claim an advantage. 36.Re1! Far from the only holding move, but I am awarding an exclamation point for not falling for Black's idea. 36.Qb3+? Kh8 37.c4 Looks like it traps Black's queen. But the nasty response Rxb6!-+ Would promptly turn the tables! 36...Qxe3 37.Rxe3 d5 The position is balanced as neither side can easily mobilize their pawn majority. Black's center looks impressive, but he can't do anything with it so long as he is left with a passive rook on b7. 38.h4 Rc8 39.Ra3 Kf7 40.Kh2 Ke6 41.g4 Rc6 42.Ra6 Ke5 43.Kg3 h6 44.h5 The position is some kind of mutual stalemate where neither side can do anything. Magnus tried to make something happen with Kd4? But only made trouble for himself after the strong response 45.Rb5! When Black has to be somewhat accurate to not get into trouble. Still, he has more than one route to a draw, and Magnus found a very easy one. Rd6! Overprotecting the d5-pawn White was planning to harass with Raa5. 46.Ra4+ Ke5 47.Rab4 Ke6 Nice and easy. White has no good way to challenge Black's central pawn mass without allowing liquidation. 48.c4 dxc4 49.Rxc4 Rdxb6 50.Rxe4+ Kf7 51.Rf5+ Rf6 Black loses a pawn but simplifies into an easily drawn 3 vs 2 on the kingside. Caruana did not even bother trying. His winning chances are approximately zero. 52.Rxf6+ Kxf6 53.Kxf3 Kf7 54.Kg3 With only 2 games to go, each player has only one game to try with White. Carlsen gets to go first, and I'll be interested to see what first move he chooses, as well as if we will see a 6th 2.Nf3 Nc6 Sicilian in the final game.
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Caruana,F-Carlsen,M-½–½2018B33World Chess Championship 201810

Round-up shows

GM Erwin l'Ami reviews the game


All games of the match

 
Loading...
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.

Translation from German and additional reporting by Antonio Pereira

Links


André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/25/2018 08:22
@ bornforchess007: Hi to you too!!
bornforchess007 bornforchess007 11/25/2018 01:35
hi
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/24/2018 07:19
@ Abraxas79 (2/2):

"My answer to this is to take, on the one side, the draw percentage of the Champions Showdown and, on the other side, the respective draw percentages in the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament in Rapid and in Blitz. The two competitions were played in the same period ; the player weren't the same, but their levels were rather similar, and the number of games quite important in one and the other event.

In the Champions Showdown, the draw percentage was 42 % (cf. https://en.chessbase.com/post/champions-showdown-improving-the-format).

In the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament, in Blitz, the draw percentage was 41 % (https://en.chessbase.com/post/saint-louis-rapid-and-blitz-day-5-2018) ; in Rapid, it was 53 % (https://en.chessbase.com/post/saint-louis-rapid-blitz-day-3). Calculating with the Blitz / Rapid ratio of the Champions Showdown (70 blitz games and 30 rapid games), this would give a 45 % draw percentage.

So, on the one hand, we have a draw rate of 42 % at the Champions Showdown ; on the other hand, calculated with the percentages of the Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz tournament, a similar competition to the Champions Showdown but in traditional chess would give a 45 % draw rate.

In my opinion, a difference of 3 % between the draw rate in Chess960 and traditional chess is more or less negligible, so I think that our working hypothesis seems in fact to be that to use Chess960 in lieu of traditional chess more or less doesn't change anything in terms of draw rate. My impression is that you didn't fully take into account the difference in defensive level between an amateur (even a very good amateur - for example a 2200 player) and a 2700+ GM : these players really KNOW how to force a draw, and, even in Chess960, they don't lose much more frequently than in traditional chess..."
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/24/2018 07:18
@ Abraxas79 (1/2): About the comparative draw rates in traditional chess and Chess960, I will simply repost (in my next post, as this post would be too long otherwise) an excerpt of one of my previous posts (taken out of a discussion about the World Championship format on this page :https://en.chessbase.com/post/world-championship-out-of-the-box#discuss).
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/24/2018 03:33
@ Abraxas79:

Do you know that, in the Chess960's "Champion Showdown" in Saint Louis, the draw rate was approximately the same as in a comparable traditional chess' tournament? I haven't the time for the moment to check it, but I have precise numbers for this...
Abraxas79 Abraxas79 11/24/2018 01:56
The game is played out. 16, 18 or 24 games would only mean more draws. The format needs to change to Chess960. Kill the opening theory and memorization and get back to playing chess.
Timothy Chow Timothy Chow 11/24/2018 06:01
I was really hoping to see 24.Bxb5 in Game 10. I wonder if a longer time control or more games in the match would have made Caruana more willing to risk 24.Bxb5. If so then I think that that would be a good argument for changing the format of the World Championship. But maybe it's just a matter of personal style, and that's just how Caruana plays. I think someone like Korchnoi would have played 24.Bxb5 or maybe even 22.axb6 no matter what the format.
benedictralph benedictralph 11/24/2018 01:32
@Pichy59: I was wondering the same thing.
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/23/2018 09:28
And globally, I must say that, personally, I find this match very interesting; the games are drawn, but this doesn't prevent them from having a quit rich chess content...
Petrarlsen Petrarlsen 11/23/2018 09:26
It seems to me rather obvious that this match shows that a 12-games match isn't enough, in view of the incredible level of defense displayed by some of the top-players, like Carlsen and Caruana. And, furthermore, Carlsen himself explained in the press conference that he think that 16 or 18 games should be better.

I think also that the problem of the present format is that 12 draws is rather OK for the two participants, because, then, there is another match, with rapid time controls.

The simplest solution was what have been used for many World Championships of the past (including all the Kasparov - Karpov matches, apart from the infamous 1984 match): in case of a drawn match, the Champion keeps his title; as this solution always seems to be quite popular, judging by the comments on the pages about the World Championship format, this would seem to be a good solution to this problem. But other solutions are also possible...

It seems that in at least some of the Kasparov - Karpov matches, in case of a drawn match, the prize fund was divided equally between the two participants; I rather think that this is something positive, as the result of the match itself would be the same for the two players, so it seems to me rather logical that they would win the same monetary prize...
Joe Boronka Joe Boronka 11/23/2018 08:47
I actually think it has been a great match , Both players fight hard , trying to squeese out a win, Both Fabi and Magnus are not pulling punches and playing safe, but trying hard every time, to win their games ,, the presuure now must be fantastic on each player , so nerves will be tight , who-ever blinks first will lose ...
Joe Boronka Joe Boronka 11/23/2018 08:42
Hoping it does not go to Blitz or Rapid , I like the idea of extenting to 16 games as Carlsen suggests , more hard fought games at Classic time controls would be great for us chess enthusiasts :) (y) <3 Joseph
Pichy59 Pichy59 11/23/2018 05:43
Some people here and on the World want to see either GM Caruana or GM Carlsen win a least 1 of the 12 games, but when games are played without too many blunders it usually ends up in a draw, but that does NOT take away the fact that both played excellent chess, usually when one side win is because the other blunder or take the bait without seeing the consequences:

Copy this website and see what I mean these games are of the most high level of any World chess championship see the beauty and complication of each moves on game 10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=141&v=vVuIYcSxiG8
Pichy59 Pichy59 11/23/2018 04:46
My suggestion is that if the game end up in a draw the next day they should start the same game again from move 10 but with reverse color and improve on the previous day's mistake, but if it end up in a draw the second time then a new opening should be selected and so on and on. Some people might say well you know that in the 2nd game which will start with the same opening but with reverse colors they will go home with a computer and do some home preparation, so WHAT both will have the same opportunity to make home preparation with Komodo or SF latest version.
fixpont fixpont 11/23/2018 02:13
I dont see problem in time control, the problem is, nobody has won a single game yet, so there is no winning necessity on any side therefore they are playing safely and nobody takes any risk at all. Imbalance is always good for the match.
Werewolf Werewolf 11/23/2018 01:36
Yeah let's speed up the time control so the World Chess Championship is just a blitz match. Actually let's make it bullet chess.

Then let's reduce the number of games to 4 so the public don't get bored.
*rollseyes*
RayLopez RayLopez 11/23/2018 11:29
Along the lines of what BeFreeBusy says, the match for classical should be 24 games, or, dare I say it, "first to six wins". Sadly, it seems the 2018 WCC classical format will be decided either on blitz or rapid.
psamant psamant 11/23/2018 10:15
@Eightxeight There are several chess tournaments for the general public to follow. Let the world chess championship be for people who are truly interested in chess. Because of the time available, we get to see a lot of deep diving into chess openings ... The Rossolimo and Sveshnivok here... and we see how these players evaluate middle game and end game positions. Lesser time means tactics hold sway without any deep plans.
BeFreeBusy BeFreeBusy 11/23/2018 09:50
Ah the "general public" argument. Well, who cares about it?! Chess is for chess players, while the public is rather stupid about it. There`s always tic-tac-toe.
Eightxeight Eightxeight 11/23/2018 08:26
The matches time limit needs to reduced to 40/90, for the general public the game is too slow and drawish
1
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.