The winner takes it all, the loser standing small...

by ChessBase
8/30/2011 – We are reporting enthusiastically on the FIDE World Cup in Khanty-Mansiysk, concentrating, as any news site would do, on the stars and the winners. But what about the players who on Tuesday all met at the airport for an early flight to Moscow? They had been knocked out in round one. Chess trainer Efstratios Grivas tells us the story of one of them, with two instructively annotated games.

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

The tournament is taking place in the Ugorian Chess Academy in the very heart of Khanty-Mansiysk, which has hosted three previous World Cups: 2005, 2007, and 2009. The 128 participants hail from 46 different countries, and are playing for a total prize fund of US $1.6 million. In addition the first three finisher get tickets to the Candidates tournament in the next World Championship cycle.

A different view: the underdog…

By GM Efstratios Grivas


The internationally known trainer Efstratios Grivas

The FIDE World Cup which started in the Russian city of Khanty-Mansiysk last Saturday, is an important event as it is not only gathering many of the (near to) top players but it is also a preliminary tournament for challenging the title of the World Champion. 128 players from around 50 countries are trying their best on this knock-out system but of course the main interest of the public is focused on the very cream of the top and rarely on the lowest rated players…

And this is a pity, as for these lower rated players and their countries their participation is an important moment for themselves, the federations and the countries. But this is life: the winner takes it all, the loser standing small, beside the victory (Abba). That's their destiny!


Grivas and the Turkish team in 2010 at a training camp in Bodrum

In the last European Individual Championship which held in Aix-les-Bains last March, I was helping (training – coaching) the Turkish participants in their try for qualification to the FIDE WC. I have been cooperating with the Turkish Chess Federation since middle 2006, from the position of the Head Trainer of the Men’s National Team, so in a way I grew-up with a lot of ‘kids’ that today they have become GMs or about to (Baris Esen, Emre Can, Mustafa Yilmaz, Kivanc Haznedaroglu, Mert Erdogdu and others).


One of the top Turkish players, GM Baris Esen, rated 2543

The mission was successful as one of them (Baris Esen) qualified… And if this does not look like something special for a lot of countries, for Turkey it was a nice touch, as this was the first time that a native Turkish player did it! The Turkish Chess Federation (and especially the ever active President Ali Nihat Yazici) was happy enough for that and tried of course to help its player to have a decent performance in the WC. Three GM trainers (Efstratios Grivas, Mikhail Gurevich and Evgeny Miroschnichenko) were involved in his preparation and accompanied him in Khanty Mansiysk.

Our squad was even the first to arrive on 23rd August for better acclimatisation and some more preparation. The opponent of the Turkish player, GM Alexander Moiseenko from Ukraine with a rating of 2715 was of course a very hard nut to crack and our GM player with an ‘only’ 2543 rating was the clearly underdog…

In the first game the Turkish player chose an ‘easy’ line which brought him no problems, but he also didn’t pose any to his opponent as well. After a technical and rather correct game, a draw was agreed.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.Bg5 Nbd7 6.cxd5 exd5 7.Qc2 Other critical lines here are 7.e3 and 7.Rc1 . 7...c5 The most active line. 7...c6 is also playable by the way. 8.dxc5 h6 A matter of taste as well. Alternatives are 8...Nxc5 9.a3 Bxc3+ 10.Qxc3 Nce4 11.Bxf6 Nxf6 12.Qe5+ Qe7 13.Qxe7+ Kxe7 14.Nd4 Bd7 15.e3 Rhc8 16.f3 h5 17.Kd2 Ne8 18.Bd3 Nd6 19.b3 Leko,P-Aronian,L Ningbo 2011 and 8...Qa5 9.Bd2 Qxc5 10.e3 Qe7 11.a3 Bc5 12.Be2 0-0 13.0-0 a6 14.Rac1 Akopian, V-Morozevich,A Yerevan 2008. 9.Bd2 9.Bxf6 doesn't look like giving much to White: Qxf6 10.0-0-0 Bxc3 11.Qxc3 Qxc3+ 12.bxc3 Nf6 13.e3 0-0 14.Bd3 Bg4 15.Rd2 Rac8 16.Ne5 Rxc5 17.Nxg4 Nxg4 18.Kb2 g6 19.Bc2 Rfc8 20.Bb3 Nf6 21.Rd3 R8c6 22.Rhd1 Rb5 23.h3 h5 24.Rd4 Kg7 25.h4 Ra5 1/2-1/2 Turova, I-Aleksandrov,A Dubai 2009. 9...Bxc5 10.e3 0-0 11.Bd3 Another set-up is by 11.Rc1 Qe7 12.Be2 a6 13.Qd3 Nb6 14.0-0 Bg4 15.Nd4 Bd7 16.Bf3 Rfe8 17.b3 Ba3 18.Rc2 Rac8 19.Nce2 Rxc2 20.Qxc2 Be6 21.Bc1 Rc8 22.Bxa3 Qxa3 23.Qd2 Carlsen,M-Ivanchuk,V Medias 2011. 11...a6 12.0-0 b5 13.Rac1 Bb7 14.Ne2 A natural move, heading for the strong d4-square. Other tries are: a) 14.Qb1 Qe7 14...Bd6 15.Ne2 Ne4 16.Bc3 Nxc3 17.Rxc3 Ne5 18.Nxe5 Bxe5 19.Nd4 Qb6 20.Rd1 Rac8 21.Rxc8 Rxc8 22.Bf5 Rc7 23.g3 g6 24.Bh3 Kg7 25.Bg2 Qc5 26.Nf3 1/2-1/2 Dreev,A-Vitiugov,N Krasnoyarsk 2007 15.Ne2 Ne4 16.Bc3 Nxc3 17.Rxc3 Bb6 18.Ned4 Nc5 19.b4 Ne4 20.Rc2 Rfc8 21.Rfc1 g6 22.Qb3 Qe8 23.h4 Rxc2 24.Rxc2 Nf6 25.Qb2 Bd8∞ Lalith,B-Aleksandrov, A Dubai 2010. b) 14.Rfd1 Re8 15.Be1 Qb6 16.Bf5 Rad8 17.Nd4 Bd6 18.Qe2 Ne5 19.h3 Bb8∞ Halkias,S-Aleksandrov,A Mainz 2006. 14...Rc8 15.Qb1 Ne4 16.Bc3 Nxc3 A natural novelty. Earlier Black has tried 16...Bd6 17.Bd4 Ndc5 18.Ng3 18.Rfd1 Qe7 19.Bc2 b4 20.Bxc5 Bxc5 21.Bxe4 dxe4 22.Nfd4 a5 Lalith,B-Ramesh,R Mumbai 2008 18...Qd7 19.Rfd1 Qe6∞ Aronian,L-Grischuk, A Moscow 2009. 17.Rxc3 Nf6 An interesting battle is ahead. Black will try to exploit his bishop pair and White his better pawn-structure (Black has an isolated pawn on d5). Chances seems to be more or less equal. 18.Rfc1 Ne4! 19.R3c2 19.Bxe4?! dxe4 20.Nfd4 20.Rxc5? Rxc5 21.Rxc5 exf3 20...Qd5 is pleasant for Black. 19...b4 20.Nfd4 Qd6 21.Nb3 White tries to exchange some pieces (correct strategy) but unfortunately are the major pieces (rooks) that will be. In positions with isolated pawn it is important to exchange the light pieces in order to exploit the weakness of the weak pawn - so in a way White is going nowhere... Bb6 22.Rxc8 Rxc8 23.Rxc8+ Bxc8 24.Qc2 Bb7 25.Nbd4 g6 Black must control some squares around his king, so why not gain some more space in this part of the board. White cannot explore the 'weaknesses' created on the dark squares, as he is simply missing his dark squared bishop. But of course his position is solid enough without any weakness around. 26.Ng3 Nc5 After further exchanges as 26...Nxg3 27.hxg3 Bxd4 28.exd4 it will be only White who has chances, due to his suberb bishop. Black's strategy to maintain pieces on the board is the correct one. 27.Bf1 h5 28.Nge2 Ne4 29.Nf3 Qf6 30.h4 White could also think of 30.Qa4 Bc5 31.Qe8+ Kg7 32.Ned4 Qe7 33.Qxe7 Bxe7= . 30...Bc6!? 31.Ned4 Bd7 As his d5-pawn is not under threat, Black decided to transfer his lightsquared bishop to a more active diagonal. 32.Bd3 Nc5 33.Be2 a5 33...Ne4 34.Bd3 Nc5 a draw could be agreed. 34.Ng5 A correct decision - White needs to control e4-square as well. Bg4 35.g3 Qe5 36.Kg2 36.Bxg4 hxg4 37.Qe2 is leading nowhere after Ne4! 37...f6? 38.Qb5+- 38.Nxe4 38.Qxg4 Bxd4 39.exd4 Qxd4 40.Nxe4 dxe4 41.Qe2= 38...Qxe4 39.Qb5 Bxd4 40.exd4 Qxd4 41.Qxa5 but maybe White should think of 36.Bf1!? and Bg2, putting some pressure on the isolated pawn. 36...Kg7 37.Qd1 Again a correct decision in slight time trouble. White could even lose after 37.Bxg4?! hxg4 38.Nb3 38.Qe2? f6 39.Qb5 Qd6-+ 38...Nxb3 39.axb3 Bd8 . 37...Bd7 Now 37...f6 is not a threat. After 38.Nh3 Bxh3+ 39.Kxh3 Ne6 40.Nxe6+ Qxe6+ 41.Kg2 d4 42.exd4 Qe4+ 43.Bf3 Qxd4 44.Qxd4 Bxd4 45.b3 there is not much left to play for... 38.b3 White could force things with 38.Bb5 Bg4 38...Bxb5 39.Nxb5 Ne4 40.Nxe4 dxe4 41.Nd6! Bc5 41...Qxb2? 42.Qd5!+- 42.Nc4 Qe6 43.b3 a4 39.Be2 Bd7= but in mutual (slight) time trouble he decided to keep it simple. 38...Ne4 If Black 'wanted' to ask something more from his position, it was time to go for 38...f6 39.Ngf3 Qe8 although I do not believe that the result could be changed easily... 39.Ndf3 Qf5 40.Bd3! Now it is Black who must play with accuracy. Bc6 41.Qc2 Bb7 42.Bxe4 dxe4 43.Nd2 Qe5! The best way to preserve equality. After 43...Bd5 44.Ngxe4 Qe5 45.Kf1 f6 46.Qd3 Qe6 47.Ke2 White would have some chances, although the black bishop pair looks strong enough to defend. 44.Nc4 44.Ngxe4? f5-+ . 44...Qc3! Again forced. If 44...Qc7? 45.Qd1! Bc5 then 46.Nxa5!± is excellent for White. 45.Qd1 Of course not 45.Qxc3+? bxc3 46.Na3 f6 47.Ne6+ Kf7 48.Nf4 Bc5 49.Nc2 Ba6 50.Ne1 Bd6 51.Nd5 Be5-+ . 45...Qd3! Forced again. Any other move would allow White to penetrate with his queen and win the game. 46.Qa1+ White hasn't much of a choice. 46.Qxd3 exd3+ 47.Kf1 Ba6! 48.Nd2 48.Ke1? Bxc4 49.bxc4 a4-+ 48...f6 49.Nh3 Kh6 would be too dangerous for him. 46...Qc3 47.Qd1 Qd3 48.Qa1+ Qc3 ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Esen,B2543Moiseenko,A2715½–½2011D38FIDE WC1.1

In the second game White did not go for the most critical lines and choose instead a ‘quiet’ variation. The Turkish player didn’t ‘understand’ his position in depth, he didn’t play well and he went down rather in no time.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.Bg5 Nbd7 6.e3 Qa5 7.cxd5 Nxd5 8.Qd2 Bb4 9.Rc1 0-0 Some previous games of Moiseenko went 9...c5 10.a3 Bxc3 11.bxc3 h6 12.Bh4 b6 13.c4 Qxd2+ 14.Nxd2 N5f6 15.f3 Moiseenko, A-Krasenkow,M Mulhouse 2011 and 9...h6 10.Bh4 b6 11.Bd3 c5 12.0-0 0-0 13.a3 Bxc3 14.bxc3 Ba6 15.Bxa6 Qxa6 16.e4 Nc7 17.d5 exd5 18.exd5= Moiseenko,A-Nadyrhanov,S Krasnodar 1999. 10.Bd3 h6 11.Bh4 e5 12.0-0 White decided to go for an 'easy' line which could promise him almost no advantage, but he could get away from Black's pre-game preparations. A previous example is 12.a3 Bxc3 13.bxc3 exd4 14.cxd4 Qxa3 15.0-0 Re8 16.e4 Nf4 17.Bb1 Ng6 18.Bg3 a5∞ Salgado Lopez,I-Esen,B Aix-les-Bains 2011. 12...Re8 13.Qc2 exd4 14.Nxd5 In an older game White chose 14.exd4 Nf8 15.Nxd5 Qxd5 16.Bc4∞ Moiseenko,A-Ovetchkin,R Rotterdam 1998. 14...Qxd5 15.Nxd4! White keeps it simple with this novelty. Known is 15.Rfd1 Ne5 16.Bh7+ Kh8 17.Nxe5 Qxe5 18.Rxd4 Be7 19.Rcd1 Be6 20.Bxe7 Rxe7 21.Bd3 c5 22.Re4 Qh5 23.Be2 Qg6 24.Qxc5 Bh3 25.Bf3 Rxe4 26.Bxe4 Qxe4 27.gxh3 Qg6+= Jobava,B-Gurevich,M Batumi 2002 and 15.exd4 Nb6 16.b3 16.Bg3?! Qxa2 17.Ne5 Be6 Shirov,A-Piket,J Aruba 1995 16...Qh5 17.Bg3 Be6 18.Ne5 Nd5= Pekarek,A-Pinkas,K Myslowice 1985. 15...Nb6?! 15...Qxa2? 16.Nb3! is out of the question, but the black knight has nothing to do on b6. Black should go for 15...Nf8!? 16.Bc4 Qh5 17.Bg3 Ne6 18.Nxe6 Bxe6 19.Bxe6 Rxe6 20.Rfd1 or even better 15...Bf8 16.Rfd1 Nc5 17.Bh7+ Kh8 18.Bg3 . 16.Rfd1? White did not need to sacrifice his a-pawn, so he should opt for 16.Nb3 Qh5 17.Bg3 Be7 18.Rfd1 or for 16.a3 Be7 17.Bxe7 Rxe7 18.Rfd1 . 16...Qh5? Black was obliged to take the challenge and grab the pawn by 16...Qxa2! Then maybe the best variation is 17.Bg3 17.Nb3 Be6 18.Nd4 Qa4 19.b3 Qa5∞ 17...Bg4 18.f3 Bd7 19.Ra1 Qd5 20.Nb5 Qc5 21.Bh7+ Kh8 22.Nd6 Qxc2 23.Bxc2 Bxd6 24.Bxd6 Nd5 25.Bc5 b6 26.e4 bxc5 27.exd5 cxd5 28.Rxd5 Be6 29.Rxc5 Re7= . 17.Bg3 Now White stands clearly better, and his plan is to advance his centre pawn majority. On the other hand Black has little to do but to wait passivly, and usually this is not a good strategy against a strong opponent. Bg4 18.f3 Bd7 19.Qf2 19.Bh7+ Kh8 20.Bf5 Bxf5 21.Nxf5 g6 22.Qb3 Qxf5 23.Qxb4± was good as well, but White is not obliged to exchange pieces yet, an action which would help Black's position to improve a bit. As Black is missing an active plan, White can take his time as he pleases... 19...Be7 20.Bb1?! This is losing time. 20.e4 was good and should be prefered. 20...g6?! Passive. Black should go for activity with 20...Bg5! 21.Re1 21.f4 Be7 22.e4 Rad8∞ 21...Rad8 22.Rc5 Nd5 23.e4 Be7 24.Rcc1 Nb6 25.a3 . 21.e4 c5?! The natural 21...Rad8 22.e5 Bc8 was clearly better, although White keeps an advantage after 23.a3 Bf8 24.Ba2 . The expansion on the queenside is false and just gives White more targets... 22.Ne2 Bf8 Black could (and should!) think of 22...c4!? 23.e5 Bf8 and 24.Be4 when both 24.Nf4 Qg5 25.h4 Qe7 26.h5 g5 27.e6 27.Nd5 Nxd5 28.Rxd5 Be6 29.Qc2 Bg7 30.Rd6 Rad8 31.Rcd1 Rxd6 32.exd6 27...Bxe6 28.Qc2 Qc5+ 29.Kh2 Bf5 30.Qxf5 Qxf5 31.Bxf5 gxf4 32.Bxf4± 24...Rxe5!? 25.Bxb7 25.Bxe5? Qxe5 26.Bxb7 Bc5 27.Nd4 Rd8 28.b4 cxb3 29.axb3 Bc8 30.Rxc5 Qxc5= 25...Rd8 26.Nf4 Qf5 27.Be4 Qf6 28.Nd5± looks fine for White, but Black can still put up a fight. 23.e5 Rxe5? A mistake in an already difficult position. Black had to go for the previous line with 23...c4 24.Nf4 Qg5 25.h4 Qe7 as was analysed in the above note. 24.Nf4! Of course 24.Bxe5? Qxe5 would be fine for Black. 24...Qg5 25.Nxg6! The point of White's combination. Ree8 25...fxg6 26.f4 Qg4 27.fxe5 is just curtains. 26.Nxf8 Kxf8 27.Rxc5 White won a good pawn and he has also increased his positional advantages (bishop pair, wrecked black pawn structure) . Qe3 28.Qxe3 Rxe3 29.Bf4 Re6 30.Rh5 30.Rh5 Black is losing more material after Kg7 31.Bf5 so he decided to call it a day... 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Moiseenko,A2715Esen,B25431–02011D00FIDE WC1.2

So, the next morning we had to make our way back home. We found ourselves in an early flight to Moscow with a lot of other unhappy faces – players who had been knocked out as well! The show will go on and life will continue. The Turkish player went back home wiser and with more passion to further improve his position in the chess world in the years to come… And what is for sure, the Turkish Chess Federation will stand next to him…


Efstratios Grivas

Efstratios Grivas is a grandmaster and highly experienced chess trainer and chess author. He lives in Athens, and he is also a FIDE Senior Trainer (Secretary of the FIDE Trainers' Commission), an International FIDE Chess Arbiter and an International FIDE Chess Organizer. He has represented his country on a great many occasions, winning the fourth position in the World Junior Championship 1985, an individual gold medal at the 1989 European Team Championship and an individual silver medal at the 1998 Olympiad.

In 2010 he was awarded the worldwide highly important FIDE TRG Awards – the Boleslavsky Medal (best author) for 2009.

Visit the Efstratios Grivas chess site

Training DVDs by Efstratios Grivas


Chess Expertise Step by Step Vols. 1 and 2. Click for more informantion

See also

Grivas Training: Building a Repertoire
18.04.2011 – "In contrast to the middlegame and the endgame, where theory is objective and accepted by everyone, in the opening each chess player makes his choices in accordance with his emotions and his personal experience. No opening loses, no opening wins." World renown chess trainer GM Efstratios Grivas explains how you should build your repertoire in Part 3 of his lecture series.
Grivas Training: Getting to Know Ourselves
13.02.2011 – Young chess players need to be able to identify the assets and weaknesses of their chess personalities. Many trainers and trainees have wondered how this can be done properly. The basic resource are one's recent games, which are used to produce an "X-ray image" of one's chess-self. GM Efstratios Grivas, a world-class trainer, tells us how to go about it, in Part 2 of his lecture series.
ChessBase Training with GM Efstratios Grivas (Part 1)
28.01.2011 – How do you help talented young chess players to realize their potential? Working with a world-class trainer is a good way to start. ChessBase has started a program to sponsor a series of training sessions, which started, logically, in our offices in Hamburg. Five young talents got a full-day session with an internationally known chess coach, who has graciously placed his entire lecture at our disposal.

Copyright ChessBase


Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.