The 'Game of the Champions' begins

by ChessBase
4/7/2006 – It is a four-game match, being played between FIDE world champion Veselin Topalov of Bulgaria, and reigning European Champion Dieter Nisipeanu of Romania. The venue is Bucharest, the time controls are classic. The first game ended in a draw. We bring you an illustrated report with commentary by GM Mihail Marin.

ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024 ChessBase 17 - Mega package - Edition 2024

It is the program of choice for anyone who loves the game and wants to know more about it. Start your personal success story with ChessBase and enjoy the game even more.


A match between FIDE World Champion Veselin Topalov (Bulgaria) and European Champion Dieter Nisipeanu (Romania) is taking place in Bucharest. There will be four games, played on April 6th to 9th, 2006, starting at 14:30h local time (= 13:30 CEST). Time controls are 40 moves in 2 hours, then 20 moves in 1 hour, and finally 15 min and 30 sec increment per move for the rest of the game.

The venue of the match is the World Trade Center, New York Hall (April 6) and Vienna Hall (April 7 - 9). Commentators are GM Mihail Marin, IM Mircea Pavlov and IM Andrei Cioara, doing live commentary in the Cairo hall. GM Dorian Rogozenko is doing live commentary on the Internet.

Auction: the board and the pieces that are being used for this match will be signed by Romanian President, Mr Traian Basescu, and by the players. It will then be auctioned on

The Game of the Champions

FIDE World Champion Veselin Topalov arrives in Bucharest

... and drives to the hotel in a limousine with manager Silvio Danialov

The official web site writes:

“The match between the World champion Veselin Topalov and the actual European champion Dieter Nisipeanu represents the most important event in the chess history of Romania. It will take place under the highest command of the Romanian President, which will make the first move in the game.

. . It`s the first time in the chess history when the world champion meets the European champion in a match. Also it is one of the most important sport events hosted by our country. By winning the European championship in 2005, Dieter Nisipeanu has proved that he is more than a world top player and he can be considered a future pretender for the world crown. His opponent in this match is the world champion Veselin Topalov, winner of chess the reunification championship that took place last fall in Argentina and considered the true successor of the legendary Garry Kasparov.

. . But this game isn't just a sport event. Thru both representatives, Romania and Bulgaria demonstrate that by accepting them in the European family, EU gains also one of the sharpest human intelligences.”

Waiting for the President: Veselin Topalov, Dieter Nisipeanu and Silvio Danialov, Topalov's manager

Romanian President Traian Basescu arrives for the start of the match

The Presedintele Romaniei greets the players

... and has a nice little chat before the first game can begin.

In attendance: Mariana Bitang, one of the most successful gymnastics trainers in history

The President ceremonially executes the first move

And game one of the match is under way

The first game of this match was annotated by Romanian GM Mihail Marin, in his usual didactic style. Even though it was a short Berlin Defence game that ended in a 29-move draw there is a lot you can learn from GM Marin's commentary. At the end of the game there is a link which allows you to play through the moves on a JavaScript board. Note that on that page you can click the notation to follow the moves and analysis on the board.

Nisipeanu,LD (2693) - Topalov,V (2801) [C67]
Match Bucharest ROM (1), 06.04.2006 [Mihail Marin]

1.e4 This move has been effectuated by the President of Romania, Traian Basescu, who mentioned in his characteristic cheerful manner that he had received very clear indications to advance the king's pawn two squares. Later, reporter Florin Orban from Radio Romania International speculated about the matter about who would the President receive "indications" from. 1...e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 Nd6 6.Bxc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 Nf5 8.Qxd8+ Kxd8

By refraining from his beloved Najdorf Sicilian and choosing the rock-solid Berlin variation, Topalov gave the sensation that he aimed to take some preliminary contact with a player whom he had only faced some 15 years ago in a youth event, which also took place in Romania. However, this might be pure speculation, since the Berlin variation occurs with increasing frequency in the FIDE World Champion's games. 9.Nc3 Ne7 10.Ne4 h6 11.Nd4!? Surprisingly, this active move has never been played before. The knight enjoys only temporary stability in the centre, because after taking the b5-square under control Black will be able to drive it away with ...c5. The outcome of the battle greatly depends on White's possibility of provoking some damage to the enemy position with the help of this knight, before it gets attacked. The more common continuation is 11.h3 Ng6 12.Re1; I have found a game where, in spite of a different move order, White managed to obtain an improved version of White's position after 14 moves. However, this was only as a consequence of Black's careless play at some moment. 11.Bf4 Ng6 12.Bg3 Be7?! (Black should have prepared the transfer of the king to the queen side with 12...Bd7!) 13.Rad1+ Ke8 14.Nd4 Bd7 15.Rfe1

Now, all White's pieces are optimally placed, while the black king feels quite uncomfortable. 15...c5 16.Nb3 b6 17.Nf6+! gxf6 18.exf6 with better chances for White, Dervishi-Zaja, Austria 2003] 11...b6 12.Rd1. This is a small concession White has to make in order to prevent the enemy king from reaching absolute safety on the queen side. Of course, he would prefer to place his rooks on the central files (d1 and e1), but 12.Bf4 (preparing the same setup as in the aforementioned game) could be met by 12...c5 13.Nb5 Be6 14.Rad1+ Kc8 and Black has little to complain about. 12...Ke8 13.Bf4 Ng6 14.Bg3. White could threaten win a pawn and threaten mate in one with 14.Nxc6? just to resign one move later after 14...Bb7 when all his minor pieces would be handing. 14...Bb7

White's advantage of space and activity look impressive, but this is usually a delusive sensation in the Berlin variation. 15.f4. Nisipeanu decides to include more forces into the attack. The tempting 15.e6 would have been also double edged, because it would give up the advantage of space and would help Black develop his king. For instance 15...a6 (Threatening ...c5, with simultaneous attack on both knights. If played immediately, 15...c5? would lead to disaster after 16.Nb5 Bxe4 17.Nxc7+ Ke7 18.Rd7+ Kf6 19.Rxf7+ Kg5 20.Nxa8 with some material advantage and, more important, a crushing domination for White.) 16.f3!? (This move was suggested by Topalov immediately after the game. White intends to maintain some stability in the centre.) 16...c5 17.exf7+ Kxf7 18.Nf5 Ke6 19.Ne3 Rc8 (The more radical 19...Bxe4 20.fxe4 c6 is also entirely playable for Black. His king would feel very comfortable under the shelter offered by the enemy e-pawn, while his compact queen side mass of pawns could become dangerous if advanced gradually.) 20.Rd2 Be7 and Black has a comfortable position because of his active pair of bishops and the centralised king. 15...a6 16.f5!? White decides to start concrete action, hoping to take advantage of his advance in development. In the press centre, 16.Re1 Rd8 17.Nf5 was considered to be a better alternative, but Nisipeanu indicated that Black can evacuate the dangerous zone with 17...Kd7 when the concentration of white forces on the king side has a rather sterile character. 16...c5 Once the long diagonal has been opened for the bishop, Black can hope for adequate counterplay. 17.fxg6 cxd4

18.Rxd4. The only way to maintain the initiative. 18.gxf7+ would have the drawback of allowing the enemy king to be activated with 18...Kxf7 . The position would suddenly become double-edged, for instance 19.e6+!? (An interesting resource, suggested by IM Mircea Pavlov. After 19.Rxd4?! Ke6 Black is definitely not worse in spite of his small material deficit. His king enjoys safe centralisation, while his pair of bishops is more active than White's minor's pieces. As for the e5-pawn, it will most likely be lost after the previsible exchange of all rooks.) 19...Kg6! (19...Kxe6?! looks slightly risky. After 20.Rxd4 the king feels slightly uncomfortable in the absence of the e-pawn. The attempt to win material with 20...c5?! would only weaken Black's sixth rank when after 21.Rd2 Bxe4 22.Re1 White would recuperate the piece maintaining the more active position.) and now, in view of the threat ...Re8, it would be time for White to think about equality with 20.Rxd4 c5 21.Rd2 Bxe4 22.Re2 Bf5 23.e7 when the presence of opposite coloured bishops in a symmetrical position would make a draw the most probable result. 18...fxg6 With his poor development, Black cannot afford to maintain the tension in this area. 19.e6. White opens the diagonal for his bishop, putting the whole black queen side under some danger. He would have no winning chances after 19.Rad1 Bxe4 20.Rxe4 Bc5+ 21.Kf1 Rf8+ 22.Ke2 Rd8 either. His central pawn can be easily blocked and does not present any danger even in the case of exchanging all rooks. 19...Rd8! Black defends his c7-pawn by indirect means and forces the exchange of one pair of rooks, which reduces White's attacking potential. The other possible way to simplify the position would be 19...Bxe4?! 20.Rxe4 Bc5+ (driving the king further from the centre) 21.Kh1 Bd6 22.Bxd6 cxd6 but after 23.e7 Ra7 24.Rae1 Black would have big problems with the activation of his king's rook. White would most likely find a favourable way to exchange his e-pawn for any Black pawn from the sixth rank in order to obtain a better single-rook endgame. 20.Rad1 Rxd4 21.Rxd4

21...Bxe4 Now, this exchange is well timed for reasons that will be highlighted in the next comment. 22.Rxe4 Bc5+ 23.Kf1 The king has to get out of his castle because after 23.Kh1 Black would win a tempo with 23...Rf8 anyway in view of the weakness of the first rank, not protected by White's other rook any more. 23...Rf8+ 24.Ke1 24.Ke2 looks more active, but would hardly chance anything if Black plays in the same way as in the game. Instead of that, 24...Ke7? would be bad because after 25.Bxc7 Rf2+ 26.Kd3 Rxg2 27.b4 the bishop would have to leave his king alone against the concentrated action of White's pieces, for instance 27...Bg1 28.Bd6+! Kd8 29.Rf4 Rf2 and now, apart from the fact that the bishop ending is easily winning for White, the forced sequence 30.Rf8+ Rxf8 31.e7+! queens immediately. 24...Bd6 25.Bxd6 cxd6

In spite of the mass simplifications, White seems to maintain some initiative. 26.Rc4 White has no better way to attack the enemy queen side. 26.Rb4 (suggested by IM Vlad Barnaure) can be met by 26...b5 27.a4 (In case of 27.c4?! Rf4 28.b3 d5 White can get the worse position already.) 27...Rf5 and White cannot make any progress. 26...Rf5! This simple move solves all Black's problems. 27.Rc8+ White's intended 27.Rc6 can be adequately met by 27...Rc5 with general exchanges and an obvious draw. 27...Ke7 28.Rc7+ Kxe6 29.Rxg7 Re5+

Remarkably, the black rook is supported by the own pawns along the whole fifth rank. In order to escape from checks, the king has to hide passively behind his pawns, which would hardly look like a winning attempt. I am not sure whether a draw was agreed here or after some more checks, because after Black's 25th move the electronic transmission of the moves was broken. 1/2-1/2. [Click to replay]

Reports about chess: tournaments, championships, portraits, interviews, World Championships, product launches and more.


Rules for reader comments


Not registered yet? Register