Recent dramatic history of the Candidates

by Johannes Fischer
3/25/2018 – In 2013 the classical candidates tournaments celebrated a comeback. With success: the Candidate Tournament in London 2013 was exciting, dramatic, and full of brilliant games. It also brought Magnus Carlsen one step closer to the title. The candidate tournaments 2014 and 2016, both held in Russia, were also fantastic. And you'll recognise many familiar names currently battling in Berlin. | Photo: Magnus Carlsen © Ray-Morris Hill

Master Class Vol.8: Magnus Carlsen Master Class Vol.8: Magnus Carlsen

Scarcely any world champion has managed to captivate chess lovers to the extent Carlsen has. The enormously talented Norwegian hasn't been systematically trained within the structures of a major chess-playing nation such as Russia, the Ukraine or China.

More...

Tournaments return: 2013, 2014, and 2016

After the scandal at the candidates tournament 1962 in Curacao, it took 51 years before the FIDE returned to this format to establish the challenger of the world champion. These 51 years saw candidate matches, with rivaling organisations that both organised world championships, a tournament that was called candidates tournament and took place in 1985 in Montpellier, in France, two tournaments, in which the players directly played for the title (San Luis in Argentina, 2005, won by Veselin Topalov, and Mexico City, 2007, won by Viswanathan Anand), but there was no classical candidates tournament, in which the winner gained the right to challenge the reigning world champion.

That is, until March 2013, when an eight-player double-round-robin candidates tournament took place in London. The way this tournament went and the drama of it gave provided supporters of this classical format with good arguments.

Candidates 2013: A nervous Carlsen

Tournament favourite in London was Magnus Carlsen. Since July 2011 Carlsen had been the world's number one and at the start of the tournament he had a rating of 2872 and was leading the world ranking list by a huge margin.

The Norwegian started well. After two draws in the first two rounds he scored two wins (against Boris Gelfand and Alexander Grischuk), followed by a draw in round five and another win in round six (against Peter Svidler). After another draw in round seven, Carlsen finished the first half of the tournament with 5.0 / 7 (+3) and seemed to be well on his way to becoming the challenger of reigning world champion Anand.

But then things started to get difficult. Though Carlsen won a nice game against Gelfand in round ten, he also seemed to get nervous because Vladimir Kramnik was suddenly winning one game after the other.

In the first seven rounds Kramnik had had a couple of good positions but did not win a single game — he started with seven draws. But then he got going and scored 4½ / 5 in rounds 8 to 12. Carlsen, however, lost in round twelve against Vassily Ivanchuk who until then had played rather erratically.

Aronian vs Kramnik

Kramnik took the lead in round twelve | Photo: World Chess

With two rounds to go Kramnik was suddenly half a point ahead of Carlsen and new favourite to win the tournament. The finish of the tournament could hardly have been more dramatic: in round 13 Kramnik and Gelfand drew while Carlsen showed against Radjabov why he enjoys the reputation of being able to win endgames that seem to be impossible to win.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Qc2 d6 5.Nf3 Nbd7 6.g3 A rare plan in the 4.Qc2 system. 0-0 7.Bg2 e5 8.0-0 8.dxe5 Nxe5 9.Nxe5 dxe5 10.0-0 c6 11.Rd1 Qe7 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bxf6 Qxf6 14.Ne4 Qe7 15.c5 Bf5 16.Rd6 Bxe4 17.Bxe4 Rfd8 18.Rad1 1-0 (59) Rajlich,I (2399)-Lomineishvili,M (2437) St Petersburg 2009 8...c6 8...exd4 9.Nxd4 c6 10.a3 Bc5 11.Rd1 Ne5 12.Na4 Qe7 13.Nxc5 dxc5 1/2 (46) Foisor,O (2495)-Hergott,D (2320) Saint John 1988 14.Nf3 9.Rd1 Re8 9...Qe7!? is probably more accurate ∆10.dxe5 Nxe5 10.dxe5! Otherwise 10...e4. 10.Bg5 Bxc3 11.Qxc3 e4 12.Ne1 h6 13.Bf4 Nf8 14.Nc2 Ng6 15.Be3 d5 16.b3 Be6 17.h3 Qd7 18.Kh2 h5 0-1 (43) Vitiugov,N (2594)-Tomashevsky,E (2646) Moscow 2007 10...dxe5 11.a3 11.Ng5 h6 12.Nge4 is positionally wrong: White should not trade knights as Black's minor pieces get in each other's way. Qc7 13.a3 Bf8 14.b4 Nxe4 15.Nxe4 f5 16.Nd2 Nf6 17.e4 a5 18.Rb1 axb4 19.axb4 Qf7 0-1 (46) Paulsen,D (2240) -Kuzmin,G (2545) Dortmund 1981 11...Bxc3 11...Bf8 deprives Black's d7-knight of a comfortable square. 12.b4 a5 13.Rb1 12.Qxc3 Qe7 13.b4 A courageous move, active but weakening the c4-pawn (square). Nb6 14.Be3?! 14.a4!? ∆e4 15.Ng5 h6 16.a5 Nbd7 17.Nh3 14...Ng4 15.Nd2 It is hard to say whether White missed 15.Bc5? Na4! or simply made a mistake in evaluation but after the exchange of his important dark-squared bishop the position roughly equalises. 15...f5 16.h3 Nxe3 17.Qxe3 e4 17...Qf7!? 18.Rac1 Be6 18.Rac1?! 18.c5 Nd5 19.Qd4 b5!? leads to complex play. After the passive text move Black seizes the initiative. 18...Be6 19.Qc3 19.c5 Nd5 20.Qd4 Rad8 21.Qe5 Nc7! , and White's knight can't get to c4 anymore. 19.f3 exf3 20.exf3 (S. Zagrebelny) is hardly enough: after Qf6 21.Bf1 Bf7 22.Qf2 Na4 White's position is very unpleasant. 19...Rad8 20.Bf1 20.c5 Nd5 21.Qe5 was relatively better after all. 20...c5?! Black fails to demonstrate prophylactic thinking (how to anticipate White's idea 21.e3 ?) and misses a strong resource: 20...Bf7! 21.e3 (what else?) Bh5 22.Re1 Nd7 (indicated by S.Zagrebelny and other commentators) 21.bxc5 Na4 22.Qb4 Nxc5 23.Nb3 After this the position nearly equalises. Rxd1 24.Rxd1 Na6 24...Nxb3 25.Qxb3 Rc8 26.e3 is hardly enough, too. 25.Qxe7 Rxe7 26.e3 Kf7 27.Be2 b6 28.Rd8 Nc5 29.Nd4 29.Nxc5 bxc5 30.Rb8 was good enough. But after the text move White obtains a strong outpost on d4, compensating for Black's c5 stronghold. 29...Kf6 30.Kf1 Rd7 31.Rf8+ Bf7 32.Ke1 g6 33.h4 h6 34.Rc8 Be6 35.Rf8+ Rf7 36.Rh8 Rc7 37.Nb5 Rd7 38.Nd4 h5 Otherwise h4-h5 could be an issue. 39.Rf8+ Bf7 40.Rc8 Ke5 41.Ra8 a6 42.Rc8 Rd6 43.Nc6+ Kf6 44.Nd4 Be6 45.Rf8+ Ke7 46.Ra8 Rd7 47.Rb8 47.Kd2 was simpler. 47...Rb7 48.Rxb7+ Why? White's rook was more active, and Black couldn't make any progress. The minor piece endgame should also be drawn but it requires accuracy from White as Black has ways to improve his position. Nxb7       49.Kd2 Kd6 50.Kc3 Bf7 51.Nb3 Ke5 52.Bf1 a5 53.Be2 Be6 54.Bf1 Bd7 55.Be2 Ba4 56.Nd4 Nc5 57.Kb2 Be8 58.Kc3 Bf7 59.Nc6+ Kd6 60.Nd4 Nd7 Black finds a plan: ...Ke5, Nc5 and ...a4 with a semblance of zugzwang. 61.Nb5+ Kc5 62.Nd4 Ne5 63.Nb3+ Kc6 64.a4?! A move, which amazed spectators and commentators. In normal circumstances a strong GM would never make such a move (creating a new serious weakness in his camp) even at gunpoint. GM Teimour Radjabov was probably in extremely bad shape. Meanwhile, the zugzwang was just an illusion; White simply needs to realise that he can play f2-f3 at some point: 64.Nd4+ Kd6 65.Nb3 a4 66.Nd2 Kc5 Zugzwang? 67.f3! 67.Bd1 Ng4 68.Bxa4 Nxf2 is indeed risky 67...exf3 68.Nxf3 Nxf3 68...Nxc4 69.Bxc4 Bxc4 70.Ne5 69.Bxf3 Bxc4 - White loses a pawn but after 70.e4 Be6 71.exf5 Bxf5 72.Bg2 Black can never break through. 64.Kd4 Kd6 65.Nd2 Nc6+ 66.Kc3 was possible, too. 64...Kd7 65.Nd4 Kd6 66.Nb5+ Kc5 67.Nd4 Be8 68.Nb3+ 68.Kb3 Bd7 This is indeed zugzwang! 69.f3 69.Bf1 Ng4 69.Nc2 Nd3 69...exf3 70.Nxf3 Ng4-+ is now a completely different story! 68...Kd6 69.c5+ Kc7! 69...bxc5 70.Nxa5 Bxa4 71.Nc4+ is a draw. 70.Kd4 Nc6+ 71.Kc3 Ne7! 72.cxb6+ Kxb6 73.Nd2 Bxa4 74.Nc4+ Ka6! 75.Na3+ Kb7 76.Nc4 Ka6 77.Na3+ Ka7! Black holds his extra pawn and gets fair winning chances. 78.Kd4 78.Nc4 Bb5 78...Nc6+ 79.Kc5 Ne5 79...Nb4!? 80.Nb5+ Kb7 81.Nc3 Bb3 80.Nc4? Probably the decisive mistake. 80.Kd4! was the right way although even after Nd3 (recommended by Alexey Dreev during a live broadcast) 80...Nc6+ 81.Kc5 Nb4 is possible, too 81.Bxd3 exd3 82.Kxd3 Bb3 we can't assume it is a clear draw. 80...Nd3+ 81.Kd4 Now 81.Bxd3 exd3 82.Kd4 Bc2 83.Kc3 a4 is hardly enough for a draw - both White's pieces are paralysed, and Black's king goes forward. 81...Nc1! White probably expected something like 81...Nxf2 82.Nxa5 Nh1 83.Ke5 Nxg3 84.Bc4 Kb6 85.Nb3 with good chances to recapture one of Black's pawns and survive 82.Bf1 Bb5 83.Nxa5? Desperation under time pressure. 83.Kc3 a4 84.Kb2 Nd3+ 84...Nb3!? 85.Bxd3 exd3 86.Nd2 Kb6 leads to a setup mentioned in the comment to White's 81st move. 83...Bxf1 84.Nc6+ Kb6 85.Ne7 Nd3 86.Nxg6 Kc7 87.Ne7 Bh3 88.Nd5+ Kd6 89.Nf6 Bg4 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Radjabov,T2793Carlsen,M28720–12013E32FIDE Candidates13

With one round to go Carlsen and Kramnik both had 8½ /13 and shared the lead. In the last round, Carlsen played with White against Svidler, while Kramnik played with Black against the unpredictable Ivanchuk. Carlsen also had a better tie-break score than Kramnik. The rules stated that if two players had the same number of points after the end of the tournament,  their direct encounters would decide and after that the higher number of wins. Carlsen and Kramnik had drawn both of their games but Carlsen had won more games than Kramnik — though he, of course, also had lost more games than Kramnik, as critics of this tie-break system pointed out.

At any rate, Carlsen could take his fortune into his own hands: he "only" needed to beat Svidler to become the challenger. However, should he draw against Svidler while Kramnik won against Ivanchuk, Kramnik would play another world championship match against Anand.

No wonder Kramnik and Carlsen were both nervous — they simply did not know whether to take risks to win or to play it safe. In the end, they both lost.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.d3 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.a3 0-0 9.Nc3 Bb7 10.Bd2 Qd7 11.a4N 11.Ne2 Nd8 12.Ng3 Ne6 13.Nf5 c5 14.N3h4 Bd8 15.Qf3 d5 Mickiewicz,P (2271)-Malaniuk,V (2522)/Koszalin 2007/CBM 119 ext (0-1, 43) 11...Nd8 12.axb5 axb5 13.Rxa8 Bxa8 14.Ne2 Ne6 15.Ng3 c5 16.Nf5 Bd8 17.c4!? This way of fighting for the light squares justifies (at least partly) the loss of a tempo with a3-a4. bxc4 18.Bxc4 Bc7 19.Re1 Re8 20.Qc1 Nh5 21.g3 g6 22.Nh6+ Kg7 23.Ng5 Nxg5 24.Bxg5 d5 25.exd5 Bxd5 26.Ng4 Bf3 27.Bf6+ Kg8 28.Nh6+ Kf8 29.Qe3 Bb7 30.Bh4 Qh3 31.f3? 31.Bd5! This is not that difficult to spot, but evaluating the consequences requires some effort. Bxd5 32.Qxc5+ Kg7 33.Qxd5 Kxh6 34.Qxf7 Ba5 35.Qxe8 Bxe1 36.Qxe5 Threatening mate with Bg5# Bxf2+! 36...Bd2 37.Qe2 Bc1 38.Be7 allows White to maintain the initiative in conditions of material equality. 37.Kxf2 Qxh2+ with a probable draw. If White interposes his queen to one of the checks, Black can exchange and win the bishop with ...g5. 31...Nf4 32.gxf4 Qxh4 33.Nxf7 Bxf3 34.Qf2 Qg4+ 35.Qg3 exf4 36.Rxe8+ Kxe8 37.Qxg4 Bxg4 38.Ng5 h6 39.Nf7 h5 40.Nh6 Bd1 41.Kf2 f3 42.h3 Bf4 43.Nf7 g5 44.Ke1 g4 45.hxg4 hxg4 46.Kxd1 g3 47.Ke1 g2 48.Kf2 Bh2 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Carlsen,M2872Svidler,P27470–12013C77FIDE Candidates14
 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
The 2013 Candidates tournament in London, had the most exciting denouement of any tournament I can remember. The brilliant Norwegian Wunderkind Magnus Carlsen, was eventually to stagger over the line, after a war of attrition and nerves that will live in the memory for many years. But it was the Russian Vladimir Kramnik who will perhaps feel most aggrieved - he did not lose a game until the last round, a game we shall now analyse, and his chess was of a very high quality indeed. There are a lot of ifs and buts, but I would not criticise the format. One player had to qualify, and if there had not existed the tie-break format, and the tournament had gone to play-offs, perhaps you would have had a much more cautious approach from the players, resulting in the veritable bore-fest which was the previous candidates. Clearly this tournament format is the way forward. 1.d4 d6 2.e4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 Kramnik essays the Pirc, a surprising choice you might think in such an important encounter. But going into the game he must have felt that he needed to win, as he could hardly have expected Carlsen to lose with White to Svidler, so perhaps he felt that his normal repertoire was too solid, and that a sharper game was needed. However I have little doubt that if such a situation were to arise again, Kramnik would not choose this opening. Readers with a good memory, may recall that the Pirc has a mixed success rate in last round games at the world championship level. Famously, Korchnoi was to be thoroughly routed when he chose this defence against Karpov in the decisive last game of their 1978 Baguio match. It is my belief that a player should stick with the approach that has brought them to this point in the first place, and not change at the last moment when on the brink of success. If you are a strategic and positional player like Kramnik or Korchnoi, you should not play the Pirc, you should stick to what you know, even if there is a danger that the game will be too dry to play for a win. But that it is just my thought and I will never play a match for the world championship! 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Be2 0-0 6.0-0 a6 7.h3 Nc6 8.Bg5 Already we are in fairly unexplored territory. 8.d5 tries to "punish" Black for his loss of time, but White was unable to prove any advantage here either. Nb8!? 9.a4 e5 10.dxe6 Bxe6 11.Nd4 Bd7 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bh4 Nc6! 14.Nxc6 Bxc6 15.Bd3 Re8 16.Re1 Qc8 17.Qd2 Nd7 18.Rad1 Nc5 and Black had comfortably equalised in the game Khalifman,A-Svidler,P Tilburg 1994, which later ended in a draw. 8...b5! Gaining some useful space, while creating a threat of ...b4. 9.a3 h6 10.Be3 e5!? A firm and commital decision, but it does create some weaknesses on the queenside, like the c5-square for example. Black might ideally like to play 10...Nd7 so that he can recapture on e5 with a piece, but the problem is that this runs into 11.d5! Nce5 12.Nxe5 12.Nd4!? Bb7 13.f4 c5 14.Ndxb5! axb5 15.Bxb5 is also good for White 12...Nxe5 13.f4 Nd7 14.Bd4 with a nice edge for White. 11.dxe5 11.d5?! Ne7 is really what Black wants. He can then look forward to very good King's Indian style play, with ...Nh5 followed by ...f5 ect. White is not helped in such structures by the fact that he has already played h3, which just gives Black an additional target on the kingside. 12.Nd2 c6 13.dxc6 Nxc6 14.Nd5 Nxd5 15.exd5 Ne7 16.c4 f5! 17.f3 Qd7 looks more than ok for Black. 11...dxe5 12.Qc1 Kh7 13.Bc5 Re8 14.Rd1 Bd7 15.b4 Qc8 16.Qe3 Nd8 17.a4 White is fighting for space for his pieces. He wants to put the bishop on c4, and also just to attack the black queenside. 17.Nd5 gets nowhere after Nxd5 18.Rxd5 Bc6 19.Rd2 Ne6 17...bxa4 18.Nxa4 Ne6! 19.Bc4 Kramnik's last turn smartly took advantage of the fact the e5-pawn is immune: 19.Nxe5? Nxc5 20.Qxc5 Nxe4 is not what the doctor ordered. 19...Nh5 20.Nc3 Nhf4 21.Nd5 Ivanchuk wants to challenge Kramnik's strong knight play in the centre, with some of his own. Serious consideration could have been given to 21.Bf1 creating an eventual threat of g3. Nxc5 22.bxc5 Ne6 with the threat of ...Nd4. 23.Nd5! sidesteps that threat, but even here play is not so clear after a5 21...Bb5!? 22.Bb3 22.Bxb5 axb5 23.Rxa8 Qxa8 only looks good for Black, he has his army very harmoniously posted, while he can start to pester White with moves like ...Qa2. 22...Bc6 Around about here Kramnik already started to think about taking over the initiative. One can only imagine the emotions raging through the players at this point, with so much at stake. Did Kramnik need to play for a win, or a draw? He was keeping a close eye on proceedings in the Carlsen encounter, which perhaps distracted him from his own game. 23.Ra5 Qb7 24.g3 Ivanchuk wants to force matters. Nxh3+ 25.Kg2 Nhg5 26.Rh1 Kg8 Jon Speelman enquired in the press conference afterwards, whether Kramnik had considered the possibility of the sacrifice 26...Nxe4!? Kramnik replied that he had, but was unsure about this as it might just be losing. However this is an excellent suggestion by the imaginative Speelman, as it would have given Black superb practical chances. One can also see Kasparov playing this way, but perhaps Kramnik found his usual instincts, to play solid, positional chess, difficult to desert? 27.Qxe4 f5 28.Qc4 Rad8 29.Be3! you see it is easy to go wrong here. At first I thought the simple 29.Rd1 was good, but this runs into e4! 30.Nh4 Bb5! 31.Rxb5 axb5 32.Qe2 c6 33.Nf4 Nxf4+ 34.gxf4 Rxd1 35.Qxd1 Bf6 and Black is taking over 29...Bb5 30.Qh4! Rxd5 31.Bxh6 It is important to make every move count Rd6 32.Bxg7+ Kxg7 33.Qh7+ Kf8 with an extremely sharp situation on the board. 27.Nxg5 Nxg5 28.f3 Bxd5 29.Bxd5 c6 30.Bc4 Qc8!? Trying to keep the game as sharp as possible, an understandable decision considering the tournament situation at this point. Afterwards Kramnik bemoaned the fact that he didn't just play 30...Ne6 here, which he considered to be close to a draw. But the problem is he didn't know which result he should be playing for at this point, as it wasn't clear yet that Carlsen was going to lose. 31.Bxe6 31.c3 Nxc5 32.Qxc5 Red8 33.Ra2 Rd7 also looks fairly equal, Black is a pawn up, but this is balanced out by his queenside weaknesses and the superb bishop on c4 31...Rxe6 32.Qd3 h5 33.Rha1 Bf8 does indeed look quite drawish. 31.Qb3 h5 32.Be3 Ne6 33.Rha1 h4 Another move that later brought sharp criticism by Kramnik, but for me this is a very human reaction - Black is becoming slowly squeezed, so it's human nature to want to grab some squares for his pieces. 34.gxh4 Qd8 35.Rxa6 Rc8? But only this move really cost Vladimir a rematch with Vishy. Now Black just has a bad position, without even a pawn to compensate for that. One can only imagine that Kramnik refrained for the seemingly natural continuation 35...Rxa6! 36.Rxa6 Qxh4 37.Rxc6 as perhaps he felt that Black is only fighting for a draw here. But at least he has some squares! Ng5 38.Bxg5 The computer makes the suggestion 38.Bxf7+ Nxf7 and now the calm 39.b5 a very sharp idea indeed, but would Ivanchuk have played this way? I somehow doubt it. Bf6 40.b6 Rd8∞ with the idea of ...Rd1, where there is still everything to play for 38...Qxg5+ 39.Kf1 Ra8 40.Ra6 Rxa6 41.Bxa6 Bh6 which should objectively end in a draw. 36.Rh1 The computer points out that it's possible to even ignore the threat on the h-pawn with 36.c3! Qxh4 37.Bxe6 Rxe6 38.b5! and the b-pawn comes through, with similar gruesome results to the game. 36...Rc7 37.Bxe6 Rxe6 38.b5! A move that effectively ended Kramnik's brave challenge for another two years, and ensured that the Norwegian Wunderkind Magnus Carlsen would challenge Anand for the World title. White's threats are murderous. Rb7 39.b6 c5 40.Rb1 Bf8 40...Bf6 41.Qd5 Rb8 42.Qxd8+ Bxd8 43.Bxc5+- 41.Qd5! By this stage it was clear that Carlsen was going to lose, but this must have been scant consolation for Vladimir, staring at the ruins of his position. Qb8 Kramnik had missed that 41...Rd7 runs into 42.Qa8! Rd2+ 43.Kg3 but his task is helpless in any case. 42.Rba1 Rd6 43.Ra8! Rxd5 44.Rxb8 Rxb8 45.exd5 Bd6 46.Ra6 Rb7 47.Kf1 The king simply runs to the queenside, while Black can't move a thing. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Ivanchuk,V2757Kramnik,V28101–02013B08FIDE Candidates14

Carlsen vs Radjabov

A remarkable finish to a wild tournament | Photo: Ray Morris-Hill

This made Carlsen tournament winner on tie-break and challenger of Vishy Anand — and in November 2013 Carlsen also became new World Champion.

Final standings

Rk. Title Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pts.
1 GM Magnus Carlsen   ½½ ½½ 01 11 ½1 8.5 / 14
2 GM Vladimir Kramnik ½½   ½½ 8.5 / 14
3 GM Levon Aronian ½½   ½0 ½½ 10 11 11 8.0 / 14
4 GM Peter Svidler 10 ½1   ½½ ½½ ½1 ½1 8.0 / 14
5 GM Alexander Grischuk ½½ ½½   ½½ ½½ 6.5 / 14
6 GM Boris Gelfand 00 ½½ 01 ½½ ½½   ½½ ½1 6.5 / 14
7 GM Vassily Ivanchuk 00 ½0 ½½   10 6.0 / 14
8 GM Teimour Radjabov ½0 00 ½0 ½½ ½0 01   4.0 / 14

Candidates 2014: Vishy Anand's convincing comeback

Anand

Vishy Anand | Photo: Amruta Mokal

After Anand had lost the world title a lot of people believed that he would withdraw from tournament chess. But the Indian grandmaster proved them wrong. Though Anand later admitted that he had not been sure whether he should indeed play in the candidates tournament 2014 in Khanty-Mansiysk, he overcame his concerns after some encouragement from his friend and rival Kramnik. The right decision because Anand, to everyone's surprise, won the tournament convincingly. The very first round indicated that the former world champion should not be written off easily. He won a fine game against Levon Aronian, one of the favourites of the tournament, against whom Anand hitherto always had had problems.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.h3 This is one of the ways to avoid the Marshall. Bb7 9.d3 d5 Still, if Black insists on sacrificing the pawn, he can do just that. 10.exd5 Nxd5 11.Nbd2 Anand repeats the move he employed last year against Caruana. After 11.Nxe5 Black has a choice between Nxe5 or 11...Nd4 12.Rxe5 Qd6 In both cases he has adequate compensation. 11.c3 has appeared numerous times as well, but Black has achieved fine results after Qd7 11...Qd7N Levon immediately comes up with a novelty. 11...f6 12.c3 12.c4 bxc4 13.Nxc4 Bb4 14.Bd2 Kh8 15.d4 exd4 16.Bxb4 Ndxb4 17.a3 Nd5 18.Nxd4 Nf4 19.Nxc6 Bxc6 20.Qxd8 Rfxd8= 1/2-1/2 (50) Dominguez Perez,L (2726)-Kasimdzhanov,R (2696) Tashkent 2012 12...Kh8 13.Bc2 13.d4 exd4 14.cxd4 is worthy to be checked in practice. The isolated pawn is a drawback, but White will have some dynamic play exploting some weak spots in Black's camp. 13...Qd7 14.Nb3 a5 15.a4 bxa4 16.Rxa4 Ncb4 17.Rxa5 Nxc2 18.Qxc2 Nb6 19.Rxa8 Rxa8 0-1 (47) Anand,V (2786)-Caruana,F (2774) Moscow 2013 11...Nf4 12.Ne4 Na5 13.Bxf4 exf4 14.d4 Nxb3 15.axb3 Qd7 16.Qd3 Rad8 17.c4 Bb4 18.Nc3 bxc4 19.bxc4 Bxf3 20.Qxf3 Qxd4= 1/2-1/2 (24) Giri,A (2737)-Tomashevsky,E (2706) Elancourt 2013 12.Nxe5 Accepting the challenge. Nxe5 13.Rxe5 Nf6 13...Nf4?! 14.Nf3 and now the piece sacrifice Nxh3+? doesn't work in view of 15.gxh3 Qxh3 16.Bd5 Qg4+ 17.Kf1 Qh3+ 18.Ke2 The king escapes safely. 14.Re1 The rook should go back as it is vulnerable in the centre. Rae8 Black doesn't have immediate threats, but the activity of all his pieces normally yields him enough play to maintain the balance, which is quite typical for this line. 15.Nf3 Bd6 15...Qf5?! 16.Nh4 and the queen has to go back, losing time. 16.Be3 Re7?! This is too innocuous. Black's play should be somewhat more dynamic. 16...Nd5 It's recommended for Black to get one of the opponent's bishops. 17.a4 17.Bd2 Rxe1+ 18.Nxe1 Qf5 19.Qg4 Qe5 With a double threat on h2 and b2. 20.Nf3 Qxb2 21.Re1= 17.Bxd5 Bxd5 is clearly okay for Black. 17...Nxe3 18.Rxe3 Rxe3 19.fxe3 Re8!? 19...c5 is also perfectly playable. 20.Ng5 Some exciting variations could arise here. Qe7! 21.Bxf7+ Kf8 21...Kh8?! 22.Bxe8 Qxe3+ 23.Kh1 Qxg5 24.Qg1 24.Qg4?? Qe5-+ 24...Qf5 25.Qe3 Bc5 26.d4 Bxd4 27.Qg3 22.Bxe8 22.Qf1 Qxe3+ 23.Kh1 Qxg5 24.Bd5+ Bf4 25.Bxb7 Qg3 26.Qg1 Re2 27.Rf1 Rxc2 28.Rf3 Rc1 29.Rxg3 Rxg1+ 30.Kxg1 Bxg3= 22...Qxe3+ 23.Kh1 Qxg5 24.Qe2 g6! 25.Rf1+ Kg7 26.axb5 Qg3 27.Rf7+ Kg8 28.Kg1 Bc5+ 29.Kf1 Qg5 30.bxa6 Bxg2+ 31.Qxg2 Qc1+ 32.Ke2 Qxc2+ 33.Kf3 Qxd3+ 34.Kg4 Qc4+ 35.Rf4 Qe6+ Black gives a perpetual check. 17.d4 17.a4 It also makes sense to open the a-file, but after c5 it won't be easy for White to play d3-d4 and perform the simplifying idea that Anand realised a couple of moves later. 17...Rfe8 17...Nd5 18.Bd2 Rxe1+ 19.Nxe1 Qf5 20.Qg4± Black doesn't have the move Qf5-e5 as in the line 16...Nd5. 18.c3 h6 Probably Levon underestimated the consequences of the move that now follows. On the other hand, it seems that White is already better. The pressure along the e-file doesn't bring Black any dividends. 18...Nd5 19.Bd2 Rxe1+ 20.Nxe1 c5 21.dxc5 Bxc5 22.Nd3 Bb6 23.Qg4 19.Ne5! Sacrificing back the pawn just at the right moment. Bxe5 20.dxe5 Rxe5 20...Qc6 21.f3 Rxe5 22.Qd2 21.Qxd7 Nxd7 22.Red1 White's two bishops are not going to allow Black to enjoy this endgame. Nf6?! I think here was the last chance to change the course of the game. 22...Nc5!? 23.Bxc5 Rxc5 24.Rd7 Re2 25.Bxf7+ 25.Rxf7 Bd5 26.Rf5 c6 27.Rb1 g6 getting rid of the pin across the fifth rank 25...Kh7 Black is a pawn down, but has decent chances to hold thanks to his active rook. 23.c4! c6?! This is an ugly move to play, but Black's position is really unpleasant. 23...bxc4 24.Bxc4 Nd5 25.Bd4 R5e7 26.Rac1 Nf4 27.Bf1± 24.Rac1 R5e7 25.a4! bxc4 26.Bxc4 Now White enjoys the pair of powerful bishops and the superior pawn structure. Nd5 27.Bc5 Re4 28.f3 R4e5 29.Kf2 Slowly, but surely Anand improves his position. Bc8 30.Bf1 R5e6 31.Rd3 The rook is going to find some penetration squares on the b-file. Nf4 32.Rb3 Rd8 33.Be3 33.Rb8 Ree8 34.Ba3 Nd3+ 35.Bxd3 Rxd3 36.Rxc6 was also great for White, but, at least here Black has some hope thanks to the opposite coloured bishops. 33...Nd5 34.Bd2 Nf6 34...Bd7 35.Bxa6 Ra8 36.Bc4 Rxa4 37.Ra3 Rxa3 38.bxa3 The passed a-pawn will most likely decide the game in White's favour. 35.Ba5 Rde8 36.Rb6 Re5 37.Bc3 Nd5 38.Bxe5 Nxb6 39.Bd4! 39.Rxc6 Nd5 40.Rc5+- 39...Nxa4 The knight will not be able to come out alive from a4, but I wouldn't even put a question mark to this move, as Black's position is beyond saving anyway. 40.Rxc6 Rd8 41.Rc4 Bd7 41...Nxb2 42.Bxb2 Rd2+ 43.Ke3 Rxb2 44.Rxc8++- 42.b3 Bb5 43.Rb4 Nb2 44.Bxb5 axb5 45.Ke3 Re8+ 46.Kd2 Rd8 47.Kc3 A very good game by Anand, which definitely gave him a boost of confidence from the very beginning of the Candidates tournament. 47.Kc3 Nd1+ 48.Kc2 capturing the knight. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Anand,V2770Aronian,L28301–02014C88FIDE Candidates1

In round two followed a draw with Black against Topalov and in round three the next win — with Black, against Shakhriyar Mamedyarov. After three rounds Anand led the field with 2½ / 3 and in the later course of the tournament he used his vast experience to defend the lead until the end of the tournament. In the entire tournament Anand did not lose a single game and though he managed to win only one more game in the next eleven rounds (against Topalov in round 10) this was enough to become clear first with 8½ / 14.

Final standings

Rk. Title Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pts.
1 GM Viswanathan Anand   ½½ ½1 ½½ ½½ ½½ 8.5
2 GM Sergey Karjakin ½½   ½½ 10 ½½ 10 ½1 ½½ 7.5
3 GM Shakhriyar Mamedyarov ½0 ½½   ½1 01 ½½ 7.0
4 GM Vladimir Kramnik ½½ 01   ½½ ½½ 10 7.0
5 GM Dmitry Andreikin ½½ ½½ ½0 ½½   ½0 7.0
6 GM Levon Aronian 01 10 ½½   ½½ 6.5
7 GM Peter Svidler ½½ ½0 ½1   10 6.5
8 GM Veselin Topalov ½½ ½½ 01 ½½ 01   6.0

This success gave Anand the right to play another world championship match against Carlsen. But Anand also lost his second match against Carlsen who defended the title for the first time.

Candidates 2016: A defensive artist with strong nerves

The candidates tournament 2016 was played from March 10th-28th, 2016, in Moscow, and was good publicity for chess and this mode of the candidates tournament. It was an eight-player double-round-robin again and exciting to the very end. Before the last round Sergey Karjakin and Fabiano Caruana shared the lead with 7½ / 13, and in the last round, they played each other. In this crucial game Karjakin, who during the course of the tournament had managed to defend a number of precarious positions, once again showed strong nerves and played his best game in the tournament:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Position not in LiveBook
1.e4 No Nf3 for today! It would be silly to say that 1.e4 is more solid than 1.Nf3, which had been Karjakin's choice in the first half of the event. But sometimes you want to fall back on the lines which you are most comfortable with, and for Karjakin that is 1.e4. c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 d6 This is not the first time that Caruana has played the Classical Sicilian, however the last time he played it was six years ago in 2009. 6.Bg5 e6 7.Qd2 a6 8.0-0-0 Bd7 9.f4 h6 10.Bh4 Main moves here for Black are g5 and Nxe4. But Caruana goes for the relative sideline with 10...b5. b5 11.Bxf6 gxf6 12.f5 A top level game that reached this position was Ivanchuk-Piket which continued h5. But Caruana is still in his preparation and goes for Qb6. Qb6 13.fxe6 fxe6 14.Nxc6 Karjakin tries to play as solidly as possible. Qxc6 14...Bxc6 was also possible. 15.Bd3 h5 16.Kb1 b4 17.Ne2 Qc5 18.Rhf1 Bh6 19.Qe1 a5!? A very interesting pawn sacrifice on f6. Of course White should be careful in taking it, because after Qe5 and Bg7 his position might just collapse. 19...Ke7 20.Qg3 Rag8 20...h4 21.Qxh4 Bg5 22.Qg3 e5 23.Nf4 exf4 21.Qf3 Rf8 22.Bxa6 20.b3!? A very double-edged move. On one hand it weakens the dark squares and on the other it prepares Bc4. Who benefits the most from it? The one who plays the best chess from here onwards. 20.Rxf6 Bg7 21.Rf3 Qe5 22.c3 a4∞ 20...Rg8 20...a4?! No matter how natural this move looks it is a mistake because it weakens the b4 pawn. As the famous trainer Mark Dvoretsky explains, Black wants his queen on e5, not on c5 defending the b4 pawn. That is the task of the a5 pawn! 21.Bc4! axb3 22.Bxb3± 21.g3 Ke7 21...Qe5 was a natural move and is met with 22.Bc4! Qxe4 23.Nd4! Qxe1 24.Rfxe1+- White is just better. 22.Bc4 Be3 23.Rf3 23.Nf4!? was a natural move and maybe better. Bd4 24.Qd2 Bc3 25.Qd3± 23...Rg4 Caruana's position looks quite attractive on the surface. His pieces are actively placed and he has good chances. However, his king is on e7 and that should always be kept in mind. 24.Qf1 Rf8 25.Nf4 Bxf4 26.Rxf4 a4 26...Bc6 keeping the status quo was also possible. 27.bxa4!? A bold decision by Sergey who is ready to ruin his structure but at the same time realises that the bishop will sit well on b3. Bxa4 28.Qd3 Bc6 29.Bb3 Rg5 30.e5!? The most critical moment of the game. Karjakin finds the right moment to break through in the center. Although the position is roughly equal the responsibility on Black's shoulders to make accurate moves has increased sharply as his king is in the centre. Rxe5! 30...Qxe5 31.Rxb4 31.Rc4!? Rd5 32.Qe2!? White has sacrificed a pawn but hopes to get to the black king in some way or the other. 32.Qxd5 Qxd5 33.Rxd5 Bxd5 34.Rxb4 would result in a drawish endgame. 32...Qb6 33.Rh4 Re5?! 33...Rxd1+ 34.Qxd1 Rh8 Exchanging one rook would have reduced White's attacking chances. Here Black has lesser dangers. 35.Rxh5 Rxh5 36.Qxh5 Qg1+ 37.Kb2 Qd4+ 38.Kb1 Be8 34.Qd3 Bg2 Caruana want to play d5 but would like to keep his bishop actively placed on e4. In some ways this is a highly ambitious move. 35.Rd4 d5 36.Qd2 Re4? Caruana was in terrible time pressure and missed White's next move. As Karjakin described it, this sacrifice was not particularly difficult to calculate. 36...Be4 37.Rxb4 Qc7 and position is complicated but Black is not worse. 37.Rxd5 exd5 38.Qxd5 Qc7 38...Rd4 39.Qxd4 Qxd4 40.Rxd4± was the best defence, but this pawn down endgame looks lost. 39.Qf5! Qh7 is an extremely difficult threat to meet. 39.Qxh5 was also very strong. Re6 40.Bxe6 Kxe6 41.Qe2+ Kf7 42.Qxg2+- White shouldn't have too many difficulties converting this. 39...Rf7 40.Bxf7 Qe5 40...Kxf7 41.Rd7++- 41.Rd7+ Kf8 42.Rd8+ What a stunning finale. The moment Caruana extended his hand, the playing hall erupted in a thunderous applause for the new Challenger - Sergey Karjakin! 42.Rd8+ Kxf7 43.Qh7+ Ke6 44.Qd7# 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Karjakin,S2760Caruana,F27941–02016Candidates 201614

Sergey Karjakin (left) during the press conference after the last round | Photo: Vladimir Barsky

Final standings

Rk. Title Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Pts.
1 GM Sergey Karjakin   ½1 01 ½½ ½½ ½½ 8.5 / 14
2 GM Fabiano Caruana ½0   ½1 ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½ 7.5 / 14
3 GM Viswanathan Anand 10 ½0   ½0 ½½ 7.5 / 14
4 GM Levon Aronian ½½ ½½   ½½ ½1 7.0 / 14
5 GM Hikaru Nakamura ½1   ½½ ½½ 11 7.0 / 14
6 GM Anish Giri ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½   ½½ ½½ 7.0 / 14
7 GM Peter Svidler ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½   ½½ 7.0 / 14
8 GM Veselin Topalov ½½ ½0 00 ½½ ½½   4.5 / 14

With this scintillating win, Karjakin gained the right to challenge Carlsen for the world championship in New York 2016. And he came close to becoming the new champion. After 12 games the match ended with a 6-6 tie and went into a four-game rapid tie-break — which, however, was convincingly won by Carlsen.

The reputation of the candidates tournaments 1950 to 1962 always suffered from suspicions of manipulations by the Soviet delegations. But such suspicions never came up in the three "modern" candidates tournaments. Instead, all three tournaments were exciting, dramatic, full of interesting games, and surprises. Will we see history repeat itself in the final rounds of Berlin?

Some statistics

In all three tournaments the winner scored 8½ / 14 (+3) but the drawing ratio was relatively low for such top tournaments. 168 games (56 in each tournament) were played all together, and 105 of these games ended with a draw. But Black has to be careful: 46 of the decisive games were won by White and only 17 by Black. The trend shows the difficulties Black faces in modern chess: in 2013 Black won ten games, 2014 four, and in 2016 only three.

Of the eight participants in 2018, only Ding Liren and Wesley So have never played a candidates tournament before. For Levon Aronian, however, it is the fourth candidates tournament. But has we have seen, experience doesn't always pay off.

Links


Johannes Fischer was born in 1963 in Hamburg and studied English and German literature in Frankfurt. He now lives as a writer and translator in Nürnberg. He is a FIDE-Master and regularly writes for KARL, a German chess magazine focusing on the links between culture and chess. On his own blog he regularly publishes notes on "Film, Literature and Chess".

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.