The Candidates Tournaments 1950, 1953, and 1956

by Johannes Fischer
3/7/2018 – On March 10th, the Candidates tournament 2018 will begin in Berlin. In November, the winner of this tournament will play a match for the world championship against Magnus Carlsen in London. Candidates tournaments have always been special, providing memorable moments in chess history, with scandals, drama and, of course, brilliant games. In the run-up to the start of this year's tournament, it's a good time to take a look at some previous classics. | Photo: Herbert Behrens (ANEFO) (Cropped from GaHetNa (Nationaal Archief NL)) [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

History and games

For a long time, the world chess title was a private affair and the reigning World Champion could choose when and against whom he wanted to risk his title. In 1946, Alexander Alekhine had died as the reigning world champion and FIDE took over responsibility for organising the World Championships. This started with the world championship tournament in Moscow and The Hague which was won by Mikhail Botvinnik. From then on, the world champion would have to defend his title every three years though not against a player of his choice but against the winner of candidates tournaments in which the best players of the world would fight for the right to challenge the world champion.

Budapest 1950

The first official candidates tournament took place in Budapest, in 1950. Ten players started in a double-round-robin, organised by FIDE. However, this first tournament was not decided by strong play alone. After 18 rounds the Soviet players Isaak Boleslavsky and David Bronstein shared first place with 12.0 / 18 each, but Bronstein later admitted that the tournament finish was manipulated. After 16 rounds, Boleslavsky was sole leader and one point ahead of Bronstein but then he slowed down. In round 17, he drew with Alexander Kotov and in the final round, he made a quick draw against Gideon Stahlberg from Sweden, one of the weaker players in the field. This allowed Bronstein to catch up. He won in round 17 against Stahlberg and in the final round defeated Paul Keres:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6 5.0-0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0-0 8.d4 d6 9.c3 Bg4 10.h3 Bxf3 11.Qxf3 exd4 12.Qd1 dxc3 13.Nxc3 Na5 14.Bc2 Re8 15.f4 b4 16.Nd5 Nxd5 17.Qxd5 c6 18.Qd3 g6 19.Kh1 Bf8 20.Rf1 Bg7 21.Bd2 c5 22.Ba4 Rf8 23.Rab1 Qb6 24.f5 Bd4 25.Qg3 Nc4 26.Bh6 Bg7 27.Bxg7 Kxg7 28.f6+ Kh8 29.Qg5 b3?? The engine here recommends 29...Rfb8 30.Qh6 Rg8 31.Qg5 with a repetition of moves. 30.axb3 Qb4 31.bxc4 Qxa4 32.Rf4 Qc2 33.Qh6 After 33...Qxb1+ 34.Kh2 Rg8 35.Qxh7+ Kxh7 36.Rh4# Black is mated. 1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Bronstein,D-Keres,P-1–01950C91Candidates Tournament18

Final standings

Rg. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pts.
1 David Ionovich Bronstein   ½½ 10 11 01 ½½ 12.0 / 18
2 Isaak Boleslavsky ½½   ½½ ½½ ½½ ½1 11 12.0 / 18
3 Vassily V Smyslov 01   ½½ ½1 10 ½1 ½½ ½½ 10.0 / 18
4 Paul Keres ½½ ½½   ½½ 10 ½1 ½½ ½1 ½½ 9.5 / 18
5 Miguel Najdorf 00 ½½ ½0 ½½   ½½ ½½ 11 ½1 ½½ 9.0 / 18
6 Alexander Kotov 01 ½½   ½1 10 10 ½1 8.5 / 18
7 Gideon Stahlberg 10 ½½ 01 ½0 ½½ ½0   ½½ ½½ ½½ 8.0 / 18
8 Andor Lilienthal ½½ ½0 ½½ 00 01 ½½   01 ½½ 7.0 / 18
9 Laszlo Szabo ½0 ½½ ½0 ½0 01 ½½ 10   01 7.0 / 18
10 Salo Flohr 00 ½½ ½½ ½½ ½0 ½½ ½½ 10   7.0 / 18

Bronstein and Boleslavsky might have hoped that the tie in the candidates tournament would lead to a three-player world championship match between Botvinnik, Bronstein and Boleslavsky but of course, Botvinnik was not particularly fond of this idea. Therefore, Bronstein and Boleslavsky, who were close friends and training partners — Bronstein later even married Boleslavsky's daughter Tatjana — were forced to play a tie-break to establish the challenger. Bronstein won this play-off which in all likelihood had also been pre-arranged.

In a confidential conversation with his fellow Minsk resident and favourite pupil Albert Kapengut, Boleslavsky admitted that just a few of those games were genuine, and to make the last game more convincing the players even had to employ a novelty that they had discovered. (Genna Sosonko, The Rise and Fall of David Bronstein, Elk and Ruby 2017, p. 50)

However, these manipulations brought Bronstein no luck. In 1951, he played a world championship match against Botvinnik but missed the title by half a point (the match ended in a 12 : 12 tie and because the challenger as challenger had to score at least 12½ points Botvinnik defended his title) and this missed chance haunted Bronstein for the rest of his life.

David Bronstein 1968 | Photo: Eric Koch / Anefo CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons

Zurich 1953

In 1953, three years after the tournament in Budapest, the second candidates tournament took place in Zurich. It was a gigantic event: 15 participants played a double-round-robin, that is, each participant had to play 28 games. Zurich 1953 is still one of the most famous tournaments in chess history, not least because of the legendary tournament book by Bronstein which many chess players consider to be one of the best chess books ever written. But though Bronstein is officially the author of this chess classic the idea to this book goes back to Bronstein's mentor Boris Vainshtein, a high-ranking and influential KGB officer. Vainshtein also wrote "the entire narrative part", Bronstein contributed only the analyses. (Cp. Sosonko, The Rise and Fall, p. 139)

This tournament book made some of the games played in Zurich 1953 famous. For example Euwe's win against Efim Geller, in which the former Dutch world champion comes up with one of the most stunning rook sacrifices in chess history:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 c5 5.a3 Bxc3+ 6.bxc3 b6 7.Bd3 Bb7 8.f3 Nc6 9.Ne2 0-0 10.0-0 Na5 11.e4 Ne8 12.Ng3 cxd4 13.cxd4 Rc8 14.f4 Nxc4 15.f5 f6 16.Rf4 In an aggressive opening White has sacrificed a pawn for a dangerous initiative on the kingside, and it seems that his plan is going to work. What can be done to prevent the simple attack on h7 with Rh4 and Qh5? Pushing the pawn from h7 to h6 is not a defence because of Bxh6, and the black king, left without pawn protection, will be an easy target for the white army. Does it mean that Black's whole strategy, based on a solid positional foundation, was a mistake? Of course not - counterattack is the answer! b5‼ One can argue that such moves are even nicer than beautiful sacrifices. Spotting a weakness on d4 Black forces his opponent to moderate his attacking plan. With an activated black queen White doesn't feel safe anymore and discovers that his position is quite vulnerable behind its shiny front. 17.Rh4 Qb6 18.e5! An excellent defensive move with a clear attacking purpose. The pawn on h7 cannot be protected. Nxe5 19.fxe6 Nxd3 20.Qxd3 20.exd7 is useless: Rxc1 21.Rxc1 Nxc1 etc. 20...Qxe6! The black king has resigned himself to an uncomfortable proximity to the white queen. A tricky attempt to avoid it... 20...g6? hoping for 21.exd7? 21.Bh6! Ng7 22.Bxg7 Kxg7 23.Nf5+! gxf5 23...Kh8 24.Qh3 h5 25.Rxh5+! mating 24.Qxf5 Rh8 25.Rg4+ with mate. 21...Qc6 led to a catastrophe, since White had 21.Bh6!... 21.Qxh7+ Kf7 22.Bh6
22.Qh5+? didn't do any good. g6 23.Qh7+ 23.Qxb5? Rxc1+! 24.Rxc1 Qe3+ 23...Ng7 24.Bh6 Rg8 and White's attack has evaporated and the crushing threat Rc8-c2 is inevitable. Now Black has time for a different consolidating actions. However, none can bring quick clarity to the positions. 22...Rh8 ?!! The question mark is in evaluation of the actual quality of the move - after perfect defence by White Black would probably lose all his advantage. Two exclamation marks for the brilliancy of this idea. The white queen is temporarily moved to a passive position, the black rook will rush to the second rank and the combination of Q+R+B will start chasing the white king, who was so far a distant observer of the shells crashing around his counterpart. At the same time just one knight on e8 is, for a few precious moments, able to keep his king out of trouble. But the price for all these accomplishments is - a full rook! 22...Qd5 23.Re4 I think now probably Qc4 was objectively the best option, although White's resources were far from being exhausted. But Euwe's mind was looking for a great adventure. 23.Qxh8 Rc2 24.Rc1? Shaken by his opponent's sudden and unexpected offensive, Geller immediately collapsed. His move prevents the deadly check on c4 after Rxg2+ Kf1. But unfortunately the black queen had another route for the final rendezvous with the white king! 24.d5‼ With this move White can break the perfect coordination of his opponent's attacking forces. Bxd5 In some analyses 24...Qb6+ was proposed as a possible improvement for Black, though the combination 25.Kh1 Qf2 26.Rg1 Bxd5 27.Re4! Bxe4 28.Nxe4 Qh4 looks quite risky. After 29.Nd6+ 29.Bxg7?? Qxe4 30.Qf8+ Kg6 31.Bh6 d5 with a much better game 29...Nxd6 30.Qxg7+ Ke6 31.Qg8+ Ke5 the black king is far too exposed. White is now winning: 32.Rd1! Qe4 33.Qg3+ 33.Be3‼ 33...Kf5 34.Rxd6 Rxg2! 35.Qe3 Qxe3 36.Bxe3 Ra2 with a probably winning endgame. But there is an even stronger continuation for White: 33.Bxe3 after which Black will not be able to survive. 25.Rd1! Keeping an eye on the ultra-dangerous bishop. Rxg2+ 26.Kf1 gxh6 and now 27.Rxd5 Even better is 27.Qxh6 Ng7 27...Bf3! 28.Rd2 and Black shouldn't be in serious risk of losing. 28.Rhd4! Bc6 29.Rxd7+ Bxd7 30.Kxg2 Qc6+ 31.Kg1 Qc5+ 32.Kf1 or 27...Bf3!... 27.Rxh6? loses after Rxg3! 28.hxg3 28.Rh7+ Rg7 28...Bc4+ 29.Kg2 29.Kg1 Qe3+ 30.Kh1 Qf3+ 31.Kh2 Qe2+ and the same. 29...Qe2+ 30.Kh3 Be6+ 31.g4 Qxg4+ 32.Kh2 Qxd1 33.Rh7+ Kg6 34.Rh6+ Kg5 etc., or 29.Kg1... 27...Qxd5 28.Re4 Ng7! 29.Kxg2 f5 30.Qxh6 fxe4 31.Qf4+ leads to an endgame where Black's chances to win are very problematic. Even better is 27.Qxh6... 24...Rxg2+ 25.Kf1 Qb3! Threatening Qf3 or Qd3+ with mate in a few moves. 26.Ke1 Qf3 and White resigned. A timely decision: 26...Qf3 27.Rf4 Qe3+ mates.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Geller,E-Euwe,M-0–11953E28Candidates Tournament2

With famous classical examples from the works of the giants, the author talks in detail about principles of chess and methods of play that we can use during every stage of the game.


Another legendary game is Kotov's win against Yuri Averbakh in which the black queen sacrifices itself to question the white king deep in Black's camp.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 d6 3.Nf3 Nbd7 4.Nc3 e5 5.e4 Be7 6.Be2 0-0 7.0-0 c6 8.Qc2 Re8 9.Rd1 Bf8 10.Rb1 a5 11.d5 Nc5 12.Be3 Qc7 13.h3 Bd7 14.Rbc1 g6 15.Nd2 Rab8 16.Nb3 Nxb3 17.Qxb3 c5 18.Kh2 Kh8 19.Qc2 Ng8 20.Bg4 Nh6 21.Bxd7 Qxd7 22.Qd2 Ng8 23.g4 f5 24.f3 Be7 25.Rg1 Rf8 26.Rcf1 Rf7 27.gxf5 gxf5 28.Rg2 f4 29.Bf2 Rf6 30.Ne2 Qxh3+ 31.Kxh3 Rh6+ 32.Kg4 Nf6+ 33.Kf5 Nd7 34.Rg5 Rf8+ 35.Kg4 Nf6+ 36.Kf5 Ng8+ 37.Kg4 Nf6+ 38.Kf5 Nxd5+ 39.Kg4 Nf6+ 40.Kf5 Ng8+ 41.Kg4 Nf6+ 42.Kf5 Ng8+ 43.Kg4 Bxg5 44.Kxg5 Rf7 45.Bh4 Rg6+ 46.Kh5 Rfg7 47.Bg5 Rxg5+ 48.Kh4 Nf6 49.Ng3 Rxg3 50.Qxd6 R3g6 51.Qb8+ Rg8 0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Averbakh,Y-Kotov,A-0–11953A55Candidates Tournament14

But in Zurich Bronstein could not repeat his success from Budapest. He scored 16.0 / 28 to share second to fourth place with Keres and Samuel Reshevsky. The tournament was won by Vassily Smyslov.

Final standings

Rg. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Pts.
1 Vassily V Smyslov   11 ½½ ½1 ½½ ½½ 11 ½0 ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½ 11 18.0 / 28
2 Paul Keres 00   ½½ ½1 ½½ ½1 ½½ ½½ 11 ½1 ½½ 11 16.0 / 28
3 David Ionovich Bronstein ½½   11 ½½ ½½ ½0 ½½ ½½ ½½ 01 ½½ ½½ 16.0 / 28
4 Samuel Herman Reshevsky ½0 ½½ 00   ½½ ½½ ½½ 10 ½½ ½1 ½1 ½1 11 16.0 / 28
5 Tigran V Petrosian ½½ ½0 ½½ ½½   ½½ ½½ 00 ½½ ½½ 11 ½1 11 15.0 / 28
6 Miguel Najdorf ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½   00 ½0 ½½ ½½ ½½ 11 14.5 / 28
7 Efim P Geller 00 ½0 ½1 ½½ ½½ 11   ½0 01 ½½ 01 ½1 01 ½½ 14.5 / 28
8 Alexander Kotov ½1 ½½ ½½ 01 ½½ ½1   10 00 10 01 14.0 / 28
9 Mark E Taimanov ½½ ½½ ½½ 11 10 01   10 ½½ ½½ ½0 11 14.0 / 28
10 Yuri L Averbakh ½½ ½½ ½0 ½½ ½1 ½½ 01   ½½ ½½ 11 00 13.5 / 28
11 Isaak Boleslavsky ½½ 00 ½½ ½0 ½½ ½½ 10 11 ½½ ½½   ½0 ½½ ½1 ½½ 13.5 / 28
12 Laszlo Szabo ½½ 10 00 ½½ 01 ½½ ½½ ½1   ½½ 13.0 / 28
13 Svetozar Gligoric ½0 ½0 ½0 ½½ ½0 ½1 ½½   ½1 11 12.5 / 28
14 Max Euwe 00 ½½ ½½ 00 10 00 ½0 ½½ ½0   11.5 / 28
15 Gideon Stahlberg 00 ½½ 00 00 ½½ 10 00 11 ½½ 00   8.0 / 28

However, Smyslov failed to overcome Botvinnik: just like Bronstein in 1951 he "only" tied the world championship match 1954 against Botvinnik and Botvinnik once again narrowly defended the title.

Amsterdam 1956

Missing the title narrowly must have been a bitter disappointment for Smyslov but he did not lose heart. After winning the candidates tournament in Zürich 1953 he also won the next candidates tournament in Amsterdam 1956 — a remarkable success.

Final standings

Rg. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Pts.
1 Vassily V Smyslov   ½½ ½½ ½1 ½½ 11 ½1 ½1 ½1 11.5 / 18
2 Paul Keres ½½   ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½ ½0 10.0 / 18
3 Tigran V Petrosian ½½ ½½   ½½ ½0 ½½ 01 ½½ 9.5 / 18
4 Boris Vasilievich Spassky ½½ ½½   ½1 ½0 ½0 ½½ ½½ 9.5 / 18
5 David Ionovich Bronstein ½0 ½1 ½0   ½½ ½½ 9.5 / 18
6 Laszlo Szabo ½½ ½½ ½½ ½1 ½½   ½½ 01 9.5 / 18
7 Efim P Geller 00 ½½ 10 ½1   11 9.5 / 18
8 Miroslav Filip ½0 ½1 ½½ 00   01 8.0 / 18
9 Oscar Panno ½0 ½½ ½½ ½½ ½½ 10   8.0 / 18
10 Hermann Pilnik ½0 10   5.0 / 18

Smyslov lost only one game in Amsterdam – against the 19-year old Spassky who made his first attempt to become world champion. In the end, Spassky shared third to seventh place but after this promising beginning, another nine years should pass before Spassky became a candidate again after sharing first to fourth place at the Interzonal Tournament 1964 in Amsterdam.

In Amsterdam 1956 Smyslov was particularly successful against his fellow Soviet player Efim Geller — Smyslov won 2-0. In candidates tournaments Geller always had problems against Smyslov: they played four games in two candidates tournaments against each other and Smyslov won all four of them. In other events Geller fared much better against Smyslov: the ChessBase Mega Database contains 56 games of Geller vs Smyslov. Geller won 11, Smyslov 8, 37 ended in a draw. And in their candidates match 1965 Geller was almost as dominant as Smyslov had previously been in the candidates tournaments: Geller won the match 5½ : 2½ (3 wins, 5 draws).

Winning his second candidates tournament in a row gave Smyslov to play another world championship match against Botvinnik in 1957. Smyslov's second attempt went much better than the first and he won the match 12½-9½ and became new World Champion. However, his luck did not last long because in the return match in 1958 Botvinnik regained the title with a 12½-10½ win. Botvinnik was world champion again and Smyslov had to play another candidates tournament — in Yugoslavia 1959.

Vassily Smyslov 1977 | Photo: Koen Suyk, via Wikimedia Commons)

Next: the candidates tournaments 1959 and 1962...

Links


Johannes Fischer was born in 1963 in Hamburg and studied English and German literature in Frankfurt. He now lives as a writer and translator in Nürnberg. He is a FIDE-Master and regularly writes for KARL, a German chess magazine focusing on the links between culture and chess. On his own blog he regularly publishes notes on "Film, Literature and Chess".

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.