TePe Sigeman & Co: Jones and Harikrishna on top

by Antonio Pereira
5/5/2019 – After three rounds, two players co-lead the TePe Sigeman & Co Tournament in Sweden's third largest city, Malmö. Top seeds Gawain Jones and Pentala Harikrishna drew two and won one to position themselves ahead of the field on 2/3. Meanwhile, Nihal Sarin wasted a big chance to take down Ivan Saric in round one — still, the 14-year-old Indian became the youngest 2600+ rated player in the world (in the live ratings). SAGAR SHAH analysed two of Nihal's games. | Photo: Official site

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

Eight players at the 25th edition

The first edition of the Sigeman & Co Chess Tournament was played in 1993, when Swedish grandmaster Ferdinand Hellers finished ahead of nine other players after scoring 6½ points. The event was a ten-player single round robin until 2008 — except in the year 2000, when Judit Polgar won a four-player double round robin ahead of Jan Timman, Ulf Andersson and Tiger Hillarp Persson. From 2009 until 2018, six times the event had a six-player field and twice it included eight participants, the format used this year.

Traditionally, the tournament shows a nice mix of local representatives and strong players that are either on the rise or are known for showing a pleasant disposition in previous appearances. Or at least that is how it looks from the outside. Everybody seems to enjoy playing at the long-established event!

Nihal Sarin, Pentala Harikrishna

Nihal Sarin with his trainer Srinath Naryanan (centre) and Harikrishna during the opening ceremony | Photo: Official site

The first round saw three games last over sixty moves! Nils Grandelius and Liviu-Dieter Nispeanu were the only ones to have a short day of work, as they drew in 22 moves; Pentala Harikrishna missed a couple of chances to take down Tiger Hillarp Persson (although the Sweden GM was the one pushing at times); while Nihal Sarin had Ivan Saric against the ropes but could not convert (more on that below). In the end, only Gawain Jones got a full point, after beating Parham Maghsoodloo with the black pieces.

TePe Sigeman & Co Chess Tournament

The playing hall during round one | Photo: Official site

Gawain had a better position out of the opening and missed a big forcing shot on move 24:

 
Maghsoodloo vs. Jones
Position after 24.Nac6

You can try your own variations on the diagram!

24...♞h3+ forces 25.♗xh3 ♛xh3 26.f3 and now Black has 26...♞g4!

 
Analysis diagram
Position after 26.Ng4

If White captures with 27.♘xg4 Black can go 27...♝xf3! — the game would continue 28.♕xf3 ♝xd4+ 29.♘xd4 ♜xc1+ 30.♔f2, when either 30...♛f1+ or 30...♜f1+ leave White busted.

That is not what Jones played, though. He went 24...xc1+ and ended up with a material advantage after the time control (a piece for a pawn). With good technique, he transformed his advantage into a full point after 61 moves. The player from Keighley had a good performance at the recent Reykjavik Open, which helped him surpass the 2700-mark and become England's number one in the last official rating list.

In round two, Harikrishna had the upper hand in the middlegame against Maghsoodloo, but was also in slight danger in the endgame — it all resulted in a 60-move draw. Nisipeanu was a pawn up against Sarin, but the youngster showed good defensive skills to hold the balance. Jones and defending champion Nils Grandelius split the point after 29 moves.

The only winner of the day was Hillarp Persson, who methodically took down Saric in 37 moves. In an already dire position, the Croatian player faltered by capturing White's 'free' a-pawn:

 
Hillarp Persson vs. Saric
Position after 27.Rxe5

27...xa4 allows White to gain the exchange almost by force: 28.xf5 gxf5 29.e6 f7 30.g3+ g7 31.xg7 xg7 32.h6+ and Black resigned five moves later.

Tiger Hillarp Persson, Nils Grandelius

The locals mingling during the opening ceremony | Photo: Official site

Hillarp Persson confidently went on to play the Sicilian against World Junior Champion Parham Maghsoodloo. With active play, however, the Iranian bounced back from his loss in round one, despite having confessed afterwards that he mistakenly prepared for the other Swedish player in the event, Nils Grandelius! This result left both players on an even 1½/3 score.

While his compatriot suffered a loss against a player that was ready to face him, Nils Grandelius had Harikrishna across the board — a player that arrived in Malmö after scoring five wins in Shenzhen. Out of a complex Italian Opening, 'Hari' simplified into a knight v bishop endgame with four pawns per side.

 
Grandelius vs. Harikrishna
Position after 36...exd4

India's number two went on to squeeze a fine technical 72-move win from this position.

Pentala Harikrishna

In good form: Pentala Harikrishna | Photo: Official site

Ivan Saric could not convert a queen endgame with a pawn to the good against Nisipeanu, while leader Gawain Jones played a highly interesting draw against Sarin.

Nihal Sarin crosses 2600

The official site published short interviews with all the participants of this year's edition. When they asked Nihal what he considered to be his main strength as a chess player, the 14-year-old answered pragmatically:

I don’t know yet. I just love playing. Too early to think about these things for me I suppose.

A fine attitude, when you know you have a long road ahead! Nihal's rating prior to this event was 2598, and after drawing his first three games against higher-rated opposition he crossed the 2600-barrier, thus temporarily becoming the youngest 2600+ rated player in the world. It remains to be seen whether he can maintain that 'title' until the next official list, but he has certainly shown he has what it takes to compete against the big guns.

Nihal Sarin

Fearless Nihal | Photo: Official site

GM Sagar Shah analysed Nihal's games from rounds one and two:

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 e6 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Bg2 0-0 7.0-0 c6 8.Qc2 Nbd7 9.Bf4 b6 10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Rc1 Bb7 12.Bc7 Qe8 13.Qb3 Ne4 14.Nc3 Nd6?! 14...Ndf6 15.a4 15.Bxd6 Bxd6 16.Nb5 Qe7 17.e3 a6 18.Nxd6 Qxd6 19.Rc3 Rfc8 20.Rac1 Rxc3 21.Rxc3 Rc8 22.Rxc8+ Bxc8 23.Qc2 White has a small but pleasant edge here. 15...Rc8 15...Nc4 16.a5 Qc8 17.Bf4?! Nxa5! 18.Nxd5? Bxd5-+ 16.Bxd6 Bxd6 17.a5 Bb8 18.a6 Bc6 19.e3 Nf6 20.Bf1 Qe7 21.Rc2 Rc7 22.Ne5 Ba8 23.Nb5 Rxc2 24.Qxc2 Bxe5 25.dxe5 Ng4 26.Qc3 f6 27.exf6 Nxf6 28.Bg2 28.Qc7 was a powerful move, simply winning the house. The a7 pawn is falling and hence Black must do something quickly. Qxc7 29.Nxc7 Ne4 30.Bh3+- 28...Qd7 29.Nd4 Rc8 30.Qd2 e5 31.Ne2 Qf5 32.Nc3 d4? 32...Qe6∞ 33.exd4 Bxg2 34.Kxg2 Rd8 35.d5! h5 35...Nxd5 36.Kg1! It's quite possible that Saric missed this move. 36.Re1 h4 37.Kg1 e4 38.Qf4!? An interesting decision by Nihal. True, his pawn structure is mangled, but at the same time he gets the queens off the board and his king is no longer under grave threat. Qxf4 39.gxf4 Kf7 40.Rd1 h3 41.f3 exf3 42.Kf2 Rc8 43.Kxf3 Rc4 44.d6 Ke6 45.Re1+ 45.Rg1+- 45...Kxd6 46.Nb5+ Kc5 47.Nxa7 Nd5 48.Nc8 Rxf4+ 49.Kg3 Ra4 50.Rc1+ Kb4 51.a7 Kb3 52.Rc6 Kxb2 53.Rd6 Ra3+ 54.Kh4 Ra4+ 55.Kxh3 Nf4+ 56.Kg4 b5 57.Rd4! Rxd4 58.a8Q At this point there was no doubt that White is winning. b4 59.Qa7 Kc3 60.Qa1+ Kd3 61.Qd1+ Kc3 62.Qc1+ Kd3 63.Kf3 Nd5 64.Nd6 64.Qb1+ Kc3 65.Nd6+- 64...Rf4+ 65.Kg3 Nc3 66.Qa1 66.Qb2 g5 67.Qb3 White will win this with some more careful moves. 66...Rf6 67.Qa6+ Kc2 The sad part is that now Rxd6 followed by Ne4+ fork is a big threat. 68.Qc4 68.Kg2 Rg6+ 69.Kh3 b3= 68...Rxd6 69.Qxb4 Rd4 70.Qb7 g5 71.Qg7 Rd5 72.Qg6+ Kb3 73.Kg4 Kb2 74.Qxg5 Nihal ends the game. Rxg5+ 75.Kxg5 Ne2 76.h4 Ng3 77.h5 Nxh5 Quite a depressing draw for the Indian youngster. But he can draw heart from the fact that he was winning without too much effort against a 2694 player. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Nihal,S2598Saric,I2694½–½2019D0225th Sigeman & Co 20191.4
Nisipeanu,L2667Nihal,S2598½–½2019B3325th Sigeman & Co 20192.3

Click or tap the second game in the list below the board to switch games


Standings after Round 3

Loading Table...

All games

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Bd3 Bc5 6.Nb3 Be7 7.Qg4 g6 8.Qe2 d6 B42: Sicilian: Kan Variation: 5 Bd3 9.a4 9.0-0 Nc6 10.Nc3 b5 11.a4 b4 12.Na2 Bb7 13.a5 Nf6 14.Bh6 Qc7 15.Rfc1 Rg8 16.c3 bxc3 17.Nxc3 0-1 (36) Erenburg,S (2589)-Caruana,F (2828) chess.com INT 2019 9...Nc6 10.Nc3 Nf6N White is slightly better. Predecessor: 10...Ne5 11.h3 Bd7 12.Be3 Nf6 13.Bh6 Bc6 14.0-0 Nh5 15.Be3 0-0 16.g4 1-0 (72) Tazbir,M (2520)-Jaracz,P (2558) Mrzezyno 2011 11.Bh6 Ne5 12.h3 Nfd7 13.Be3 b6 14.0-0 0-0 15.Bh6 Re8 16.Qe3 Nxd3 17.cxd3 Bb7 18.d4 Rc8 19.Nd2 Qc7 20.Nf3 Qc4 21.Rfc1 Qb3 22.Qe2 e5 22...Nf6 is interesting. 23.Bg5 Qb4 24.Qe3 e5 25.Qd2 Kg7 23.dxe5 23.Ra3 is more complex. Qc4 24.Qd1 Qb4 25.Rb3 Qa5 26.Ra1 23...Nxe5 24.Nxe5 dxe5 25.Nd5 Bxd5 25...Rxc1+ keeps more tension. 26.Rxc1 Bxd5 27.exd5 Qxa4 28.b3 Qd4 26.Rxc8 Rxc8 27.exd5 Qxd5 28.Qxa6 Qe6 28...Qd8= 29.Be3± Rc6 30.Qb5 f5 31.Re1 31.a5± bxa5 32.Rxa5 31...Kf7 32.Bd4 e4 33.Be3 Bf6 34.b3 h5 35.Rd1 h4 36.Kf1 36.b4= 36...g5 37.Rc1
37...Rxc1+ Black should try 37...Rd6! Strongly threatening ...f4. 38.Rc7+ Kg6 38.Bxc1= f4 39.Bd2 Kg6 40.f3 exf3 41.Qd3+ Kg7 42.Qxf3 Bd4 43.Qd3 Qe5 44.b4 Kh6 45.a5 bxa5 46.bxa5 With the idea Bb4. Kg7
46...Qc5= 47.a6 47.Bb4!± 47...Qc5 48.Ke2 Qd5 49.Kf1 Qc5 50.Qb3 Hoping for Qb4. Kf6 50...Kh6= keeps the balance. 51.Qb4± Qd5 52.Bc3 Bxc3 53.Qxc3+       Endgame KQ-KQ Kg6?       53...Ke6± is more resistant. 54.Qc2+? 54.a7+- Qb5+ 55.Ke1 Qb1+ 56.Kd2 54...Kh6= The position is equal. 55.a7 Qb2 is the strong threat. f3 56.gxf3 Qxf3+ 57.Kg1 Qe3+ 58.Qf2 Qc1+ 59.Kg2 Qc6+! 60.Kf1 Threatens to win with Qf8+. Qc1+ 61.Qe1 Qc4+ 62.Qe2 Qf4+ 63.Ke1 Qc1+ 64.Kf2 Qf4+ 65.Kg1 Qg3+ 66.Qg2 Threatening mate with Qxg3. Qe3+ 67.Qf2 Qc1+ 68.Kg2 Qc6+! 69.Kf1 aiming for Qf8+. Qc4+ 70.Ke1 Qc1+ 71.Ke2 Qc2+ 72.Ke3 Qc5+ 73.Kf3 Qc6+ Accuracy: White = 51%, Black = 61%.
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Harikrishna,P2730Hillarp Persson,T2563½–½2019B42TePe Sigeman&Co 20191.1
Maghsoodloo,P2671Jones,G27020–12019E60TePe Sigeman&Co 20191.2
Grandelius,N2688Nisipeanu,L2667½–½2019C07TePe Sigeman&Co 20191.3
Nihal Sarin2598Saric,I2694½–½2019E08TePe Sigeman&Co 20191.4
Harikrishna,P2730Maghsoodloo,P2671½–½2019C78TePe Sigeman&Co 20192.1
Jones,G2702Grandelius,N2688½–½2019A34TePe Sigeman&Co 20192.2
Nisipeanu,L2667Nihal Sarin2598½–½2019B33TePe Sigeman&Co 20192.3
Hillarp Persson,T2563Saric,I26941–02019A21TePe Sigeman&Co 20192.4
Grandelius,N2688Harikrishna,P27300–12019C54TePe Sigeman&Co 20193.1
Maghsoodloo,P2671Hillarp Persson,T25631–02019B42TePe Sigeman&Co 20193.2
Nihal Sarin2598Jones,G2702½–½2019C78TePe Sigeman&Co 20193.3
Saric,I2694Nisipeanu,L2667½–½2019C13TePe Sigeman&Co 20193.4
Harikrishna,P2730Nihal Sarin25981–02019B30TePe Sigeman&Co 20194.1
Maghsoodloo,P2671Grandelius,N2688½–½2019B31TePe Sigeman&Co 20194.2
Jones,G2702Saric,I26941–02019B51TePe Sigeman&Co 20194.3
Hillarp Persson,T2563Nisipeanu,L2667½–½2019C00TePe Sigeman&Co 20194.4
Saric,I2694Harikrishna,P2730½–½2019C88TePe Sigeman&Co 20195.1
Nihal Sarin2598Maghsoodloo,P26711–02019C54TePe Sigeman&Co 20195.2
Grandelius,N2688Hillarp Persson,T25631–02019B41TePe Sigeman&Co 20195.3
Nisipeanu,L2667Jones,G2702½–½2019D00TePe Sigeman&Co 20195.4
Harikrishna,P2730Nisipeanu,L2667½–½2019C11TePe Sigeman&Co 20196.1
Maghsoodloo,P2671Saric,I2694½–½2019D45TePe Sigeman&Co 20196.2
Grandelius,N2688Nihal Sarin25981–02019B31TePe Sigeman&Co 20196.3
Hillarp Persson,T2563Jones,G27020–12019A36TePe Sigeman&Co 20196.4
Jones,G2702Harikrishna,P2730½–½2019C54TePe Sigeman&Co 20197.1
Nisipeanu,L2667Maghsoodloo,P2671½–½2019B08TePe Sigeman&Co 20197.2
Saric,I2694Grandelius,N2688½–½2019C44TePe Sigeman&Co 20197.3
Nihal Sarin2598Hillarp Persson,T2563½–½2019A33TePe Sigeman&Co 20197.4

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.