Tata Steel Chess: Three leaders, four rounds to go

by Antonio Pereira
1/23/2019 – Early leader Ian Nepomniachtchi defeated Vidit Gujrathi's Petroff Defence to join Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand at the top of the standings. Round nine also saw Vladimir Fedoseev bouncing back to 50% after tricking Teimour Radjabov in a rook endgame and Jorden van Foreest holding Anish Giri to a draw from a complex middlegame. In the Challengers, Maksim Chigaev is still the sole leader. Expert analysis by GMs DANIEL FERNANDEZ and DANIEL KING. | Pictured: Pia Sprong | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

The not-so-drawish Petroff

It is already a well-known fact that World Championship matches set opening trends both at the elite and amateur levels. Last year's challenger for the crown, Fabiano Caruana, used the Petroff as his main weapon with Black while getting his spot at the most prestigious chess event in the world and at the match itself. Vidit Gujrathi — like most elite players — probably looked into the 'Russian Defence' because of this and used it against Ian Nepomniachtchi in their ninth round game.

They followed the line played by Carlsen and Caruana in the sixth game of the match, when Magnus manoeuvred his knight no less than nine times in the first fourteen moves. 'Nepo' deviated on move six, however, and later confessed that he did not expect this opening, as Vidit is not an expert in said defence. The definite character of the position was established when Black exchanged his dark-squared bishop:

 
Nepomniachtchi vs. Vidit
Position after 23.Rd1

A queenless middlegame with bishops of opposite colours was set up after 23...Bxd4 24.Rxd4. The computer thinks it is a balanced struggle, but it is clearly more difficult to play with Black, as White has the space advantage and an easier path to progress on the queenside. Eventually, Nepomniachtchi managed to get an outside passed pawn on the a-file and went on to win the game after 37 moves:

 
Position after 37.Ba5

Black's position is hopeless. Vidit resigned.

The usual post-mortem discussion | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Chess is hard

Despite starring some of the strongest players in the world, some supertournament games finish with decisive results from apparently innocuous positions — for example, a non-expert eye would not have realised how hard it was for Vidit to defend the almost symmetrical queenless position he had against Nepomniachtchi.

A clearer example was seen in the game Teimour Radjabov vs Vladimir Fedoseev. A tense struggle turned into a rook endgame in which Black was a pawn up. White had an active king, though, and it was not clear how the Russian would break through. 

Probably Fedoseev was aware of the fact that the resulting pawn endgame was favourable, as he quickly played the winning combination that followed the exchange of rooks:

 
Radjabov vs. Fedoseev
Position after 83...b5

Black just pushed his pawn to b5, and after 84.axb5+ he quickly played 84...Kd6! instead of the 'automatic' 84...Kxb5 (which is a draw). The trick is that after 85.Kxg6 a4 86.f5 a3 87.f6 a2 88. f7 Ke7...

 
Analysis board
Position after 88...Ke7

...White needs to defend his f-pawn with 89.Kg7 and Black queens with check: 89.a1Q+! winning the game. After 84...Kd6, Radjabov simply resigned.

Fedoseev is back on 50% | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Mere mortals usually avoid giving up a queen, as it is way too difficult to judge if there is enough compensation for the sacrifice (...or we do it 'bravely', trying to speculate our way into a lucky win). The same cannot be said about Jorden van Foreest's sacrifice against Anish Giri — the younger Dutchman did not fear his opponent's abilities when he gave up his queen:

 
Giri vs. Van Foreest
Position after 16.dxe6

The simple 16...fxe6 was playable, but Jorden's 16...Nf3+ is the computer's first suggestion. The game continued 17.Bxf3 Qxd2 18.exf7 Kxf7 19.Bxa8 Bf8 and Black gave back the queen shortly afterwards. There are many alternative lines and you can try them out on the diagram above. (After trying some lines, do not miss the analysis provided by GM Daniel Fernandez below).

After the tension was relieved, the players found themselves in a more controlled position and signed a draw after 30 moves, although Giri could have kept on pushing if he wanted to. He talked about his draw offer with Fiona Steil-Antoni:

Co-leaders Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand drew their games with Black against Sam Shankland and Richard Rapport, with Carlsen using a rather provocative defence against the U.S. Champion — he played both ...a6 and ...h6 before move five. Meanwhile, Ding Liren obtained a favourable position against Vladimir Kramnik — after the Russian got himself in time trouble — but could not convert it into a win in the end.

The second “Chess on Tour” round on Wednesday will see Carlsen having the white pieces against Anand in the much-awaited clash between co-leaders — the players of the Masters section will take a 45-minute trip (approximately) to the South Holland city of Leiden.

When colleagues admire your work... | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 9 - Masters

Loading Table...

All Masters games analysed by GM Daniel Fernandez

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 a6 A relatively major trend of the 2010's. Black threatens to take on d5 and obliges his opponent to enter a Carlsbad structure in which ...a6 will be useful rather than committal. 4.cxd5 4.Nf3 is of course playable, but after dxc4 5.a4 Nc6 6.e4 Na5 7.Be3 or similar, the compensation is less clear-cut than in a standard Moscow Gambit. 4.e4 attempts a favourable comparison to the 3...c6 4.e4!? gambit, but dxe4 5.Nxe4 Nf6= was just fine for Black in Roubalik,J-Zilka,S Czech Republic 2018 4...exd5 5.Nf3 h6 This is maximalist, and provocative. There isn't much reason why the 5...Nf6 6.Bg5 Be6 7.e3 Nbd7 8.Bd3 h6 9.Bf4 of Karjakin,S-Caruana,F Saint Louis 2018 should scare Black, but if the text can be played, then it should be. 6.Bf4 6.Qb3 Nf6 7.e4!? Nxe4! 7...dxe4 8.Ne5 Be6 9.Qxb7+- 8.Qxd5 Qxd5 9.Nxd5 Bd6 10.Bd3 Nf6 11.Nxf6+ gxf6 12.0-0 Nc6 13.Re1+ Kf8 14.Be3= Here a draw was agreed in Parligras,M-Rakhmanov,A Banja Vrujci 2017, on the premise that in the absence of queens, the isolated d-pawn is as weak as the doubled f-pawns. 6...Nf6 7.e3 Bd6 8.Bxd6 Qxd6 9.Qc2 0-0 10.Bd3 Re8 11.h3 It might turn out that this move is unnecessary, because Black wasn't planning ...Bg4 for some time yet. Let us examine: 11.0-0 Bg4 If Black plays 11...Be6 with the idea of ... Nbd7 as in the game, then h3 could have been saved. For instance, 12.b4 12.Ne5 c5! 12...Nc6 13.f4 should be something for White 13.Qa4!? 13.Qd2 b5 14.f4 Nc6 15.h3 cxd4 16.exd4 Be6 with play on both sides of the board 13...Be6 14.Qa3 b6 I think White has a nibble in this Barry-type position. The computer likes 13...Rxe5, but then Black is really playing for tricks. 11...Be6 12.0-0 Nbd7 It is reasonable to ask, given the game continuation, why Black didn't go for 12...c5!? immediately, so that his knight could use the c6-square and (probably) ...b5 would still be an option? 13.dxc5 Qxc5 14.Rac1 Nc6 15.Rfd1 12...c6 is a more aggressive way to handle the position, inviting White to play b4 at some moment if he wishes, but reserving options like ...Nd7-b6 in that eventuality. For instance: 13.a3 Nbd7 14.b4 a5 15.Qb2 b6!? Or ...Nb6. 13.a4 13.Na4 Ne4! This thematic counter-blow at first looks impossible, but in fact it's necessary to stop White developing a choke-hold on c5. 13...Rac8 14.Rfc1 c5 On one hand, this move usually hands over a slight plus to White for the foreseeable future, but on the other, Black seems uniquely well placed in this case to carry out the standard mitigating procedures. 15.dxc5 Nxc5 16.Nd4 Bd7 17.Qd1 In case of any ...Nce4xf2 type ideas. 17.Bf5!? seeks to clarify matters a bit. Nce4 17...Ne6! seems best. Now say 18.Rd1 With e4 ideas in the pipeline. 17...Bxf5 18.Qxf5 g6 19.Qc2 Qe5 20.Nce2 18.Bxe4 Nxe4 19.Qb3 17...Rc7 18.Bc2 Rec8 19.Nde2 Ne6 20.Bb3 Bc6 21.Nd4 White suffers in this phase from a lack of obvious plans, being that d5 is defended as many times as Black needs. He ends up not finding one, and Black gets to consolidate further. Qb4 22.Nce2 Bd7 23.Rxc7 Rxc7 This is now just dead equal. 24.Qe1 Qxe1+ 25.Rxe1 Nc5 25...Kf8 Playing this first presents White with a small strategic problem. If he marks time, then ...Nc5 will come next. 26.Rd1 Nc5 27.a5 Ke7= 26.Rc1 a5 27.Bc2 Kf8 28.b3 Na6 29.f3 Nb4 Starting to give White things to think about. There needs to be, for instance, a serious response to ...b5, both immediately and in the future. 30.Kf2 Ne8 31.Ke1 Nd6 32.Bb1 And this is a tacit offer of a draw. 32.Kd2 b5 33.axb5 Bxb5 Black has his targets too. 32...Rxc1+ 33.Nxc1 Ke7 34.Bd3 Kf6 35.h4 b6 36.Kd2 Ke5 37.g4 g5 38.hxg5 hxg5 39.Nce2 Nxd3 40.Kxd3 Nb7 The attempt 40...f5?? is hugely ill-advised due to the tactic 41.f4+ Kf6 42.fxg5+ Kxg5 43.Nf3+‼ and White is basically winning. 40...b5!? is playable, though knights tend to be good in close combat such as this. 41.f4+ Kf6 42.Nc3 bxa4 43.Nxd5+ Kg7 44.Nb6! 44.bxa4?! Bxa4 45.fxg5 Kg6 is still a draw, but with Black having a very active king and passed a-pawn it could go wrong. 44...Bxg4 45.Nxa4 gxf4 46.exf4= and there isn't much left to play for. ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Shankland,S-Carlsen,M-½–½2019D31Tata Steel Masters9
Mamedyarov,S-Duda,J-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters9
Nepomniachtchi,I-Vidit,S-1–02019Tata Steel Masters9
Rapport,R-Anand,V-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters9
Giri,A-Van Foreest,J-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters9
Kramnik,V-Ding,L-½–½2019Tata Steel Masters9
Radjabov,T-Fedoseev,V-0–12019Tata Steel Masters9

The Reliable Petroff

The Petroff (or Russian) Defence which is characterised by the moves 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 has been popular at the highest levels for many years and enjoys the reputation of being an extremely solid defence.


Round 9 round-up

GM Danny King recapped the action from round nine

All Roundup shows


All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Three decisive games in the Challengers

Maksim Chigaev remains as sole leader of the Challengers tournament with four rounds to go — let us remember that the biggest prize in this event is a spot in next year's Masters section. Vladislav Kovalev and Andrey Esipenko are half a point behind and are still way within range of finishing on top.

The decisive games of Tuesday saw Benjamin Gledura beating Elisabeth Paehtz and getting his third win in four rounds; Stefan Kuipers winning for the first time in the tournament (against Lucas van Foreest); and Parham Maghsoodloo taking down Dinara Saduakassova with the black pieces.

Esipenko might qualify to the Masters at 16 | Photo: Alina l'Ami

A most-welcome visitor, Vlastimil Hort | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Standings after Round 9 - Challengers

Loading Table...

All games - Challengers

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.