Tata Steel Chess: The usual suspects

by Antonio Pereira
1/21/2019 – Magnus Carlsen and Vishy Anand defeated Richard Rapport and Shakhriyar Mamedyarov respectively to share the lead on 5½/8 at the Tata Steel Masters. Jan-Krzysztof Duda and Vladimir Fedoseev also won in Sunday's eighth round and received a boost of confidence before the second rest day. In the Challengers, Maksim Chigaev got his third straight win and is the sole leader. GM ADHIBAN BASKARAN sent expert analysis. | Photos: Alina l'Ami / Official site

ChessBase 18 - Mega package ChessBase 18 - Mega package

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

More...

The kings of Wijk aan Zee

It has already been over five years since Magnus Carlsen became the sixteenth undisputed World Champion in Chennai. His predecessor — and the challenger that faced him in Sochi just a year later — is none other than Viswanathan Anand. In fact, the Indian held the crown for six years. Despite a 21-year age difference, Vishy remains one of Carlsen's closest rivals in big tournaments today. And he is currently number six on the live ratings list.

Magnus and Vishy have also accumulated the most trophies in Wijk aan Zee, with Carlsen overtaking Anand with his 2018 triumph. The 16th World Champion has six titles against Anand's five. After winning their round eight games, both are the co-leaders in this year's edition.

The 15th undisputed World Champion | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Richard Rapport was Carlsen's victim. The Hungarian had defeated the Norwegian two years ago, exactly in round eight. When reminded about this, Magnus did not hide the fact that he arrived in the game with that in mind and said, "It was nice to get revenge". Rapport played inaccurately during the opening phase and a pawn push highlighted White's positional advantage:

 
Carlsen vs. Rapport
Position after 24...Rfe8

The central break 25.e5 clarified the situation in favour of White. Although Magnus declared that he was not sure whether this move was good or not, it was impossible for his opponent to defend against the threats created after the break. Carlsen used his positional edge to get a strong kingside attack and closed the deal with a blow:

 
Position after 39...Rxf6

It is the final move before the time control but it was not hard for White to find 40.Rxh7+, and Black quickly resigned.

When Carlsen was interviewed after his victory, Anand had not yet finished his game, despite the fact that he only needed 29 moves to force Mamedyarov's resignation. According to Vishy, things went downhill for the Azeri right from the start:

 
Anand vs. Mamedyarov
Position after 12.Nb3

Shak had played a Caro-Kann against Anand's 1.e4, but already spent over ten minutes on move eight. On the position above, he went 12...Bd7 and soon afterwards found his light-squared bishop completely stuck behind its own pawn structure — Vishy suggested 12...a5 as a good alternative.

White was dominating positionally and even got to 'sacrifice' a rook twice on d5. First, on move 21:

 
Position after 20...Rxc4

21.Rxd5 and Black cannot capture for obvious reasons. Then, seven moves later...

 
Position after 27...Rbe4

This time, Black captured the rook but resigned shortly afterwards: 28.Rxd5 exd5 29.Qxd5 1-0. The rook is coming to d1, the knight is about to jump to g5 and the e-pawn is a huge asset...there were more than enough reasons for Shak to stop the clocks. 

Two more wins for White

A few days ago it seemed like only the players that had the black pieces were capable of winning in Wijk aan Zee. Nonetheless, precisely Vishy Anand warned us about the fleeting nature of these trends:

There are only two colours in chess, and there will be a trend this way and there will be a trend that way. I think this is essentially meaningless, these trends.

Funnily, the opposite trend seems to be gaining strength, as all four decisive games on Sunday favoured White. First, Jan-Krzysztof Duda inflicted Vladimir Kramnik's fourth loss of the tournament, and he did it from an Italian Opening. The Polish grandmaster is back on 50%, while Kramnik is alone at the bottom of the standings with 2/8.

The other 'white win' was seen in the last game to finish, as Vladimir Fedoseev had to work extra to convince Sam Shankland that his position was resignable. It was the Russian's first win this year, despite having achieved great positions against Van Foreest and Carlsen in previous rounds. Black was doomed when the time control was reached:

 
Fedoseev vs. Shankland
Position after 41...Na6

42.f6 opened up the bishop's diagonal against Black's rook and increased the pressure against the king. Shankland kept on fighting and had to accept going into an endgame three pawns down. As expected, however, he finally resigned on move 52.

Yet another strong Russian grandmaster, Vladimir Fedoseev | Photo: Alina l'Ami

Monday will be a rest day, which will be followed by only two rounds before another day off. This might have something to do with the fact that the players in the Masters section will travel to Leiden on Wednesday, where, incidentally, the Carlsen-Anand clash will take place.

Standings after Round 8 - Masters

Loading Table...

Round 8 round-up

GM Yannick Pelletier analysed the action of round eight

All Roundup shows


All games - Masters

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6 5.d3 d6 6.0-0 a6 7.a4 0-0 8.Re1 C54: Giuoco Piano: 4 c3 Nf6, main lines with 5 d4 and 5 d3 a5 8...h6 9.h3 Be6 10.Bxe6 fxe6 11.Be3 Bxe3 12.Rxe3 Qd7 13.Nbd2 Qf7 14.g3 Nd7 15.Kg2 a5 0-1 (45) Giri,A (2798)-Anand,V (2784) Zuerich 2016 CBM 171 [Marin,M] 9.h3 h6 10.Nbd2 Be6 11.Bb5 Na7 12.d4 LiveBook: 6 Games Nxb5 13.axb5 exd4 14.Nxd4 Re8 15.Nf1
15...Bc4N Predecessor: 15...Bd7 16.Ng3 d5 17.e5 Ne4 18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Rxe4 Qd5 20.Qf3 Bxd4 21.cxd4 Re6 22.Rf4
½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Giri,A2783Anand,V2773½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Shankland,S2725Ding,L28130–12019C8881st Tata Steel Masters 20195
Fedoseev,V2724Vidit,S2695½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Masters 20195

Three in a row for Chigaev

After round six, the Challengers section had a sole leader in Vladislav Kovalev after the Byelorussian had accumulated three straight wins; two rounds later, Maksim Chigaev is in the same position, as he won three in a row to command the standings on 6 out of 8. His Sunday victory came against Stefan Kuipers, who is not having a good time so far in Wijk aan Zee.

Curiously, only two games finished drawn on the eighth round, but one of these two draws was a sharp fight between the two highest rated players in the field, Anton Korobov and Vladislav Kovalev — GM Adhiban analysed the game deeply: 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
I decided to take a look at the top clash at the challengers! 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 exd4 An interesting offbeat line which was probably a surprise to Korobov. 7...Nc6 is the undisputed mainline. 8.Nxd4 Re8 9.f3 c6!? 10.Kh1 10.Be3 d5 11.cxd5 Nxd5 12.Nxd5 cxd5 13.Rc1 a5!? would lead to the amazing masterpiece in this line (Gustafsson-Kramnik 2012) 10...Nh5 11.g4!? White is more or less obilged to take up the gauntlet as other moves don't offer him anything. 11.Be3 f5 followed by f4. 11.f4 Qh4! 12.Bxh5 Qxh5 11...Nf6 11...Qf6 doesn't work due to 12.Nf5! gxf5 13.gxh5± 12.Bf4 12.Bg5 h6 13.Bh4 a6 with a messy position. Another tempting possibility but for some reason underrated. 12.Be3!? h5 12...Qe7 13.Rg1 13.g5 Nfd7 14.Qd2 Nb6 15.Rfd1 12...h5 12...a6 13.Qd2 13.Rg1 d5 13...d5 14.e5 Nfd7 15.Bg5 Qc7 16.f4± 13.Nf5! First introduced in Shomoev-Ganguly Aeroflot rapid 2013. Always a decent alternative to the h5 idea is 13.g5 Nh7 14.Qd2 Qe7 14...Nd7 15.Rad1 Ne5 16.Be3 Bh3 17.Rg1 15.Rad1 Nd7 Black has sufficient counterplay. 13...gxf5 14.gxf5 d5 14...Nbd7 15.Rg1 Kh8 16.Qe1 Ne5 17.Qh4 Nh7 18.Qxh5 Qe7 19.Rg3 and white soon won in the origin game of this Nf5 line. 15.cxd5 cxd5 16.e5 Previously Kovalev had faced 16.Rg1!? which should be the real test of this line. dxe4 16...Kh8 17.Rxg7 was the spectacular (Gelfand-Amonatov Oly 2014) 17.Nxe4 Qxd1 18.Nxf6+ Kh8 19.Raxd1 Bxf6 20.Rd6 Nd7 21.Bb5 Rg8 22.Re1 a5 23.Bxd7 Ra6 24.Rd5± is clearly better according to comp but looks like Kovalev was apparently ready to defend this! 24.Rxf6 Rxf6 25.Bxc8 Rxc8 26.Be5 Rcc6 (Zontakh-Kovalev 2014) which eventually ended in a draw. 16...Bxf5 17.exf6 Qxf6 The following sequence is forced for both sides. 18.Nxd5 Qxb2 19.Ne7+ Rxe7 20.Qd8+ Bf8 Kasim-Topy from 2013 continued 20...Kh7 21.Qxe7 Bg6 Here white improved with 22.Qe8!± (Albornoz-Hernandez 2018) 21.Rg1+ Bg4!N Only this is the novelty. 21...Bg6 22.Bc4 was a complete disaster for black in (Landa-Grigoryan 2014) 22.fxg4 Nd7 23.gxh5+ Kh8 24.Qxa8 Rxe2 Black has enough compensation to hold the balance. 25.Rae1 25.Raf1 Qb5! 26.Rg2 Qd5 27.Rfg1 Rxg2 28.Rxg2 Qd1+ 29.Rg1 Qf3+ 30.Rg2 Qxf4 Black is the one with chances. 25.Rab1 Qd4 26.Qxb7 Qxf4 27.Rg2 Rxg2 28.Qxg2 Nf6 25...Rxe1 26.Rxe1 Qf2 27.Bg3 Qf3+ 28.Kg1 Kh7! I guess black more or less finished the game at home! 29.Rf1 Bc5+ 30.Bf2 Qg4+ 31.Kh1 Qe4+ 32.Kg1 Qg4+ An interesting choice followed by deep opening preparation.If I was to choose someone from the challengers group to make it to the masters, Kovalev would be my pick! Although I am not entirely ruling out the leader Chigaev who seems to have finally woken up with a sudden burst of power and has won three in a row! ½–½
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel GpB8

Standings after Round 8 - Challengers

Loading Table...

All games - Challengers

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.Be3 e5 7.Nb3 Be6 8.f3 h5 9.Nd5 B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5 9.Qd2 Nbd7 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.exd5 g6 12.Be2 Bg7 13.0-0-0 0-0 14.g4 a5 15.a4 Nb6 16.gxh5 Nxh5 17.Bb5 Nf6 0-1 (71) Leko,P (2690)-Vachier Lagrave,M (2780) Batumi 2018 9...Nxd5 10.exd5 Bf5 11.Bd3 Bxd3 12.Qxd3 Nd7 LiveBook: 20 Games 13.0-0 Be7 14.Qd2 0-0 15.Na5N Predecessor: 15.c4 Qc7 16.Na5 Bd8 ½-½ (33) Jacobsen,J (2151)-Kuhne,D (2273) ICCF email 2010 15...Qc8 16.c4 Bd8 17.Rac1 Re8 18.Kh1 e4 19.Nb3 exf3 20.gxf3 Ne5       21.c5 Qh3       Black has strong initiative. 22.Qd1
22.Bd4 22...Ng6!-+ 23.Qd2 Rc8 24.Bg1 Nh4 25.Qf2? 25.Rcd1 is a better defense. 25...Bg5 26.Rc4 Nf5 27.Qg2
27...Ng3+!       Deflection 28.Qxg3 Qxf1 29.Rc2 Bf6 30.Rf2 Qb5 31.cxd6 Rcd8 32.Rd2 h4       33.Qf4 Re1 34.Rg2 Qxf6 is the strong threat. h3 35.Rg4 White threatens Qxf6 and mate. Be5 36.Qg5 Rxd6 ( -> ...Qe2) 37.Nd2 Qe2 38.Qf5 Qxh2# Accuracy: White = 18%, Black = 93%.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Maghsoodloo,P2679Korobov,A26990–12019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Chigaev,M2604Saduakassova,D24721–02019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Esipenko,A2584Kovalev,V2687½–½2019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Praggnanandhaa R2539Bareev,E26500–12019C1581st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Van Foreest,L2502Gledura,B2615½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Paehtz,E2477Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Kuipers,S2470L'Ami,E26430–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20191
Korobov,A2699Gledura,B2615½–½2019D8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Kovalev,V2687Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B3181st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Maghsoodloo,P2679Paehtz,E24771–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Bareev,E2650Chigaev,M2604½–½2019A4581st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
L'Ami,E2643Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C8881st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Keymer,V2500Kuipers,S24701–02019D1281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Saduakassova,D2472Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20192
Gledura,B2615Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Chigaev,M2604Kovalev,V2687½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Esipenko,A2584Keymer,V25001–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Praggnanandhaa R2539L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Van Foreest,L2502Bareev,E26501–02019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Paehtz,E2477Korobov,A2699½–½2019A6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Kuipers,S2470Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019B6281st Tata Steel Challengers 20193
Korobov,A2699Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019E5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Kovalev,V2687Van Foreest,L25021–02019C6781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Maghsoodloo,P2679Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Bareev,E2650Gledura,B2615½–½2019D0381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
L'Ami,E2643Chigaev,M2604½–½2019C7781st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Keymer,V2500Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019D2481st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Paehtz,E2477Kuipers,S2470½–½2019C1381st Tata Steel Challengers 20194
Gledura,B2615Kovalev,V26870–12019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Chigaev,M2604Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Esipenko,A2584Paehtz,E2477½–½2019D1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Praggnanandhaa R2539Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Van Foreest,L2502L'Ami,E2643½–½2019B5681st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Saduakassova,D2472Bareev,E26500–12019A5881st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Kuipers,S2470Korobov,A26990–12019B3281st Tata Steel Challengers 20195
Korobov,A2699Bareev,E2650½–½2019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kovalev,V2687Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B26150–12019C9281st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Paehtz,E2477Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019E0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20196
L'Ami,E2643Gledura,B2615201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.3
Keymer,V2500Van Foreest,L2502201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.4
Maghsoodloo,P2679Chigaev,M2604201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.5
Kuipers,S2470Esipenko,A2584201981st Tata Steel Challengers 20196.7
Bareev,E2650Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Gledura,B2615Keymer,V25001–02019A0781st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Chigaev,M2604Paehtz,E24771–02019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Esipenko,A2584Korobov,A26991–02019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Praggnanandhaa R2539Kuipers,S24701–02019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Van Foreest,L2502Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019B0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Saduakassova,D2472L'Ami,E2643½–½2019A8581st Tata Steel Challengers 20197
Korobov,A2699Kovalev,V2687½–½2019E9481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Maghsoodloo,P2679Gledura,B2615½–½2019A0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
L'Ami,E2643Bareev,E26501–02019D1981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Esipenko,A2584Praggnanandhaa R25391–02019B6981st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Keymer,V2500Saduakassova,D24721–02019A1881st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Paehtz,E2477Van Foreest,L25020–12019E0681st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kuipers,S2470Chigaev,M26040–12019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20198
Kovalev,V2687L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Bareev,E2650Keymer,V2500½–½2019D0281st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Gledura,B2615Paehtz,E24771–02019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Chigaev,M2604Esipenko,A2584½–½2019C5081st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Praggnanandhaa R2539Korobov,A2699½–½2019C5481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Van Foreest,L2502Kuipers,S24700–12019C1181st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Saduakassova,D2472Maghsoodloo,P26790–12019A3481st Tata Steel Challengers 20199
Korobov,A2699L'Ami,E2643½–½2019D0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Maghsoodloo,P2679Bareev,E26501–02019B1281st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Esipenko,A2584Van Foreest,L25021–02019D3781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Praggnanandhaa R2539Chigaev,M26040–12019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Keymer,V2500Kovalev,V26870–12019A1081st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Paehtz,E2477Saduakassova,D2472½–½2019B4781st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kuipers,S2470Gledura,B2615½–½2019B4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201910
Kovalev,V2687Maghsoodloo,P26791–02019B0181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Bareev,E2650Paehtz,E2477½–½2019A0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
L'Ami,E2643Keymer,V2500½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Gledura,B2615Esipenko,A2584½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Chigaev,M2604Korobov,A2699½–½2019B9081st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Van Foreest,L2502Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019B4181st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Saduakassova,D2472Kuipers,S2470½–½2019D4381st Tata Steel Challengers 201911
Korobov,A2699Keymer,V25001–02019D3581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Maghsoodloo,P2679L'Ami,E2643½–½2019C0281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Chigaev,M2604Van Foreest,L2502½–½2019E3281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Esipenko,A2584Saduakassova,D24721–02019C4281st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Praggnanandhaa R2539Gledura,B26150–12019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Paehtz,E2477Kovalev,V26870–12019A4881st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kuipers,S2470Bareev,E26500–12019B1381st Tata Steel Challengers 201912
Kovalev,V2687Kuipers,S24701–02019C0781st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Bareev,E2650Esipenko,A25841–02019A4981st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
L'Ami,E2643Paehtz,E24771–02019E0081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Gledura,B2615Chigaev,M26041–02019B0881st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Van Foreest,L2502Korobov,A2699½–½2019B3081st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Keymer,V2500Maghsoodloo,P2679½–½2019D7181st Tata Steel Challengers 201913
Saduakassova,D2472Praggnanandhaa R2539½–½2019A0581st Tata Steel Challengers 201913

Links


Antonio is a freelance writer and a philologist. He is mainly interested in the links between chess and culture, primarily literature. In chess games, he skews towards endgames and positional play.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.