Letter of support by the Romanian Chess Federation
Nr.306/28.05.2015
To the Organizers of the European's Women Championship 2015
Chief Arbiter of the European's Women Championship 2015
European Chess Union
Dear Sirs,
Romanian Chess Federation, being aware about some allegations regarding
the possible cheating by the Romanian Player WGM Mihaela SANDU
during EWICC 2015 which is happening in these days in
Chakvi – GEORGIA, hereby ask you to observe strictly
the FIDE Anti Cheating regulations and FIDE Ethic rules in this situation.
This field was recently regulated by FIDE in what regarding cheating
cases, false accusations and sanctions and that is why we draw your special
attention in dealing with the situation. In this particular case, it is
clear when a Cheating Complaint, without any evidence or clue, was forwarded
in the stage when Mihaela SANDU was leading the tournament, that a big
pressure was put on her. Here we mention also the negative atmosphere
around the case and that she is complaining about severe harassments,
situation that clearly affects the capacity of Mihaela SANDU to compete
at her best.
The Romanian Chess Federation (RCF) states that Mihaela Sandu had a irreproachable
fair play attitude during all her chess career and express its will to
support and protect Mihaela SANDU against any breach of Anti cheating
or Ethics rules and kindly ask you to inform RCF about the entire situation
and what actions were taken by the arbiters and organizer.
We assure you that our federation is supporting FIDE anti cheating policy,
including the protection against false accusations and for the sake of
chess, we ask your strong support in assuring a proper environment during
the EWICC 2015.
 |
Letter of complaint by Mihaela Sandu
Complaint
Dear organisers of the European Women's Chess Championship 2015,
I am writing in response to the attack I have been submitted to in the
past few days in the European Women's Chess Championship in Georgia.
First of all I would like to know what is the official reason of the
interruption of the transmission of my game in round 6 against Nino Batsiashvili?
That was a critical point in the tournament for me, I was leading the
tournament and that interruption started to generate suspicions about
my play.
I somehow managed to pull myself together after this incident and my
6th round loss, and win another game in round 7, but after this I was
submitted to a very strong attack from several women chessplayers in a
written letter.
In this letter they were expressing "concerns about the situation
with M. Sandu's performance" and asked to stop the live transrnissions
of my garnes. The letter was signed by 15 chessplayers, the first signature
on the list was of my next round opponent, N. Zhukova.
So I am writing this letter to file a complaint about their behaviour.
What they did was a very dirty attack, permanently damaging my name in
the chess world. Also want to mention Zhukova's paltry behaviour is standing
out as she was the main benefactor of the defamation campaign, making
psychological attacks right before our game.
I play chess for a long time now and I have never cheated in my life.
My life revolves around chess, I am both a chess teacher and a professional
chess player so my name in chess is very important to me. I have come
to this cornpetition after serious chess preparation, with great hopes
of a good result and confidence in myself. But some people seem to think
that if you have a good result, you have to be punished.
I have tried to stay calm and play as usual after this attack, but I
have learned it's impossible. There is an enormous psychological pressure
and it's difficult to find the energy to play normal chess. I even thought
about withdrawing from the tournament, but my family and my dear ones
support me and tell me to continue in spite of everything.
I also want to inform all 15 chessplayers who have signed the above mentioned
letter that what they did is a very serious crime, smearing my name, and
that together with my Federation we're seeking legal counseling to make
justice.
I hope this case is sent to FIDE and that they will take measures to
prevent such situations in the future. I am looking forward to your official
answer,
Mihaela Sandu
|
Friday, 29 May 2015
While studying hard for my final exams and having no time to throw away at
all, I simply couldn't help myself expressing my deepest disgust about the situation
where a few WGM's, ex World and European Champions and strong GMs amongst them,
accused my colleague from the National Team- WGM Mihaela Sandu for cheating.
WGM Mihaela Sandu
We have been colleagues and also opponents for quite a few years so far and
I find this accusations very disturbing, not only for Mihaela herself, but for
the chess community as well. She is a very dedicated player who loves playing
and teaching chess. All the games we played against each other were very combative
and fought until the last drop of blood. I have a high respect and consideration
for Mihaela's chess.
I understand that losing to a lower rated opponent can be quite frustrating,
but I don't understand the need of being so paranoid and unprofessional. I find
this whole situation simply outrageous and I want to point out that chess is
not war and not all the means that can be used to win are ok. I used to think
that professional chess players are very intelligent and highly sensible persons
and as sportsmen they all demonstrate a high level of fair play. Well, I guess
I couldn't be more wrong.
I understand that we all want our rights to be respected, then why not respect
the rights of others? I can understand the accusations made though I could never
agree with them. I understand that with so many cheating cases around, one might
get paranoid. What I don't understand is:
-
On what grounds could someone who didn't even get the chance to play against
Mihaela accuse her?
-
Why the arbiter to whom the accusations were presented after the game finished
didn't check Mihaela immediately in order to clarify the situation and avoid
all this fuzz?
-
Why the organizers, after thoroughly having analyzed the situation and
having come to the conclusion that there were no proof of any kind and the
player was wrongly accused didn't take out those shameful signed letters
from the walls of the playing hall? Why didn't they publicly apologize to
Mihaela?
-
Why the organizers didn't give a warning to the player who clearly took
advantage of this situation in order to put pressure on Mihaela before their
game?
Maybe some of you would think of this words to be somewhat harsh, but how
do you think Mihaela felt with all this false accusations? How should I feel
now as a professional chess player? Should I be afraid to play good chess and
to win against stronger opponents? Does it mean that in 10 years I will be cataloged
as an expired chess player who doesn't have the right to play strong? What is
with all this nonsense?
I am very disappointed that such kind of situations can happen nowadays and
I hope that conclusions will be drawn and measures will be taken so that such
unfair and abusing behavior would never happen again!
Mihaela, all your friends and colleagues are with you, cheering for you and
my admiration for your fighting spirit has only grown! Keep up the good work
and I cross my fingers for you to keep offending those high egos!
Top standings after ten rounds
Individual performance of Mihaela Sandu
| As we go into publication Mihaela Sandu is playing her final round
game in Chakvi against IM Alisa Galliamova, with the black pieces. A somewhat
deeper scan of the ten games played so far has not yielded anything that
would indicate that computer assistance might be involved. However, the
fact that Sandu without exception won all the games in which there was
live transmission and lost all in which the broadcast was delayed is going
to be used by her opponents to justify their suspicions. We once again
urge our readers to judge for themselves, using the computer correlation
function in ChessBase 13 (highlight the games in the games list, right
click and use "Edit – Let's Check Engine Correlation").
Please post your conclusions in the feedback section below, where possible
stating which engine were involved in the analysis.
|
