12/4/2024 – Grandmaster Jon Speelman delves into the ongoing World Chess Championship match in Singapore, offering insightful analysis and drawing fascinating parallels to historic encounters like Botvinnik v. Petrosian in 1963. With Gukesh and Ding trading psychological blows as much as tactical ones, Speelman highlights critical moments that reveal each player's mindset and strategy under immense pressure. From Gukesh's bold refusal of a threefold repetition to Ding's cautious attempts to regain control, Speelman's commentary illuminates the evolving dynamics of a closely contested match. | Photo: FIDE / Eng Chin An
Chess Festival Prague 2025 with analyses by Aravindh, Giri, Gurel, Navara and others. ‘Special’: 27 highly entertaining miniatures. Opening videos by Werle, King and Ris. 10 opening articles with new repertoire ideas and much more. ChessBase Magazine offers first-class training material for club players and professionals! World-class players analyse their brilliant games and explain the ideas behind the moves. Opening specialists present the latest trends in opening theory and exciting ideas for your repertoire. Master trainers in tactics, strategy and endgames show you the tricks and techniques you need to be a successful tournament player! Available as a direct download (incl. booklet as pdf file) or booklet with download key by post. Included in delivery: ChessBase Magazine #225 as “ChessBase Book” for iPad, tablet, Mac etc.!
Winning starts with what you know The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.
In this dynamic and practical video course, IM Andrew Martin arms you with powerful antidotes to White’s most annoying sidelines.
€34.90
The importance of keeping a level head
[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]
I'm going to write this column incrementally, updating it after each game of the World Championship. Of course, these have been annotated in great detail all over the place, but I want to focus on just a few moments and what they reveal about the players and the state of the match.
My preliminary title, "Remember 1963", is an exhortation that presumably only a tiny proportion of my readers will be able to take literally. I was very much alive myself, and indeed had been taught the moves of chess on Boxing Day 1962 (which I recently discovered was the eve of the great freeze in the UK). But I wasn't really aware of Botvinnik v. Petrosian until my mum bought me my first "real" chess book – not a beginner's book like Bott and Morrison's excellent Chess for Children, and later The Chess Apprentice, which as I've said here before was Bob Wade's account of that match.
Considered a master of prophylaxis, Petrosian sensed dangers long before they actually became acute on the board. In his prime, Petrosian was almost invincible. Let our authors introduce you into the world of Tigran Petrosian.
Ding wasn't born until 1992 and Gukesh until more than 40 years after Botvinnik v. Petrosian in 2006, but I think that that match does teach us something about the importance of keeping a level head. I gave games one and five here a month ago so I won't repeat them, but the important point is that Petrosian, who had never beaten Botvinnik, played utterly abysmally in game one and, rather than panic, simply carried on as if nothing had happened. This seemed to confound Botvinnik, and Petrosian famously won game five and later the match.
Tigran Petrosian v. Mikhail Botvinnik in 1963
We'll see over the coming days how the match pans out but my advice to Gukesh today would have been very much not to take the game to heart and just to carry on and if possible not try "too hard". This applies to Ding too, of course. He was exceptionally nervous in game one because he hadn't won a classical game since January when he beat Gukesh himself and Max Warmerdam at Wijk ann Zee.
The most important thing under the crushing pressure of a match is to create a space in which you can operate and that has to happen in real time but can be planned for.
Game two was something of an interlude but also interesting, of course. After the opening, Gukesh needed to play accurately to avoid a long-term positional disadvantage, but he found a couple of good moves, solved the problem and drew (seemingly) pretty easily.
Then came game three, in which Gukesh created complicated tactical problems from the off. Ding reacted well to start with, but it seemed hubristic to leave his bishop trapped on c2, and Gukesh was able to take advantage. Admittedly retreating the bishop to f5 and then e6 would have been very complicated too. Computer engines find ways to get decent compensation, but that isn't really the point. If he'd just retreated the bishop to f5, then Ding would have had a very decent position and the engines even give him the edge.
As it was, Gukesh won the piece, consolidated really well and then won time as he was about to emerge a whole rook ahead. It was his first-ever win against Ding at classical chess, and at that moment I felt that the match tipped clearly in the challenger's favour again.
Gukesh levelled the score in game three | Photo: FIDE / Eng Chin An
In this Fritztrainer: “Attack like a Super GM” with Gukesh we touch upon all aspects of his play, with special emphasis on how you can become a better attacking player.
In game two, Ding as White had created some strategic problems for Gukesh which needed to be met accurately. He did something similar (in a different opening) in game four, but again Gukesh was well up to the task and when Ding had the choice between hand-to-hand fighting and equalising, he probably pretty sensibly chose the latter. The pattern which has been emerging is of Ding trying to get control but shying away from messy positions, the more so after he was out-calculated in game three.
In game five, Gukesh returned to 1.e4 and, when Ding persisted with the French, switched to the Exchange Variation. It soon got quite tense, but as Gukesh strove to create opportunities for himself, he somewhat overstepped the mark and was in some danger, at least for a move or two. But he pulled himself together and found a decent defence, and Ding really didn't seem to believe that he had real winning chances since he immediately bailed out. Neither of them was hugely impressive in this game, and if I were to add another fairly empty exhortation, it would be to both of them to believe in themselves when they have real chances. Apart from game one, this probably applies more to Ding than Gukesh, who has been pretty optimistic for the rest of the match.
Gukesh was certainly optimistic in game 6, when in this diagram, he spurned a draw by threefold repetition which at this moment he could have claimed: by writing 26...Qg5-e7 on his scoresheet.
Ding v. Gukesh
"Tis but a scratch!"
As I've noted in the game file, by refusing the draw, he asserted regarding the gaping wound on his queenside, "Tis but a scratch". Later in the press conference, he said, "I thought I always have counterplay... It's not for playing for a win or anything. I just wanted to make a few more moves and see what happens". But I think that he was being pretty optimistic, and our lords and silicon masters broadly agree.
Of course, Gukesh did survive pretty easily and emerge more or less without a scratch. This looks as I write like a psychological victory for him. But maybe Ding has been sucking him in playing rope-a-dope?
Ding Liren during game six | Photo: FIDE / Eng Chin An
New ...
New Game
Edit Game
Setup Position
Open...
PGN
FEN
Share...
Share Board (.png)
Share Board (configure)
Share playable board
Share game as GIF
Notation (PGN)
QR Code
Layout...
Use splitters
Swipe notation/lists
Reading mode
Flip Board
Settings
Move
N
Result
Elo
Players
Replay and check the LiveBook here
Please, wait...
1.e4 The overwhelming impression of this game is the extreme nervousness of both players. Of course it was Gukesh's first ever game in the World Championship while Ding hadn't won a classical game since January.e62.d4d53.Nc3Nf64.e5Nfd75.f4Given that he's going to play Nce2 next move, it's interesting that he didn't do so here:5.Nce2c56.c35...c56.Nce2Nc67.c3a5After 28 minutes!8.Nf3a49.Be3Be710.g4Gukesh was still following his preparation and played this novelty after less than 30 seconds. It's presumably a perfectly decent move, and what it does show is that he wanted to hit the ground running because he thought, or at least hoped, that Ding would continue his bad form.Qa5After about 14 minutes.11.Bg2a312.b3cxd413.b4If13.Nfxd4Bh4+14.Bf2Bxf2+15.Kxf2g5!undermines the defence of the crucial e5-pawn13...Qc714.Nexd4Nb615.0-0Engines suggest instead Nb5 or even Bf1, but castling is obvious for a human.Nc416.Bf2Bd7
Gukesh had played quickly up to here, but he now thought for 33 minutes and produced a not especially good move.17.Qe217.Nd2Looks like the most sensible to me with a very decent game and no danger.17...Nxd418.Nxd4?!Playable, but Bxd4 was much easier.18.Bxd4Bb519.Rfe118...Nb2!An excellent idea which seemed to discombobulate Gukesh.19.Qe3I think I'd have acceded to19.Rfc1Qc4but it's already getting unpleasant for a person.19...Rc820.Rac120.Rfc1h521.g5g6is very pleasant for Black and a miserable way to start the match as White - but safer.22.Kh10-020...Qc4
21.f5?A very human move but bad.Qd322.Qe122.Qf4h622...g523.f6g522...Bg5!23.Rc2Rc4threatening Rxd423...0-0was also strong but not23...Ba4?!24.fxe6!with massive complications.24.h4Bf425.Qb1!
A clever defence thretening Rxb2.25...Rxc3!?Perhaps the best move but allowing huge complications. Instead25...Na4!?26.Rd1Nxc327.Rxd3Nxb128.Rxc4dxc429.Rh3h5gives Black a clear advantage without too much mess, so looking at it now it doesn't feel that clear, so Ding's Rxc3 was a reasonable decision.26.Rxc3Qxc327.fxe6I presume that Ding calculated up to the Qd4+ trick and so aimed for it.fxe6?27...Bxe6!28.Ne2Qxe529.Nxf4Qxf4would have kept control30.Qc2Qc431.Qxc4Nxc432.Rd1Kd733.Bxd5Bxd534.Rxd5+Ke628.Ne2Qxe529.Nxf4Qxf4
Here Gukesh thought for 6 of his remaining 10 minutes and made an extraordinarily bad choice. I think that this is the moment in the game which most exemplifies the enormous pressure he was under and how much it affected him.30.Qc230.Bc5!Qxg4was obvious and now, discouragingly for White, the clever hit Qxh7 fails, but Rf3! is very decent.31.Rf3!threatening both Qf1 and Rxa3.31.Qxh7?Qd4+!32.Bxd432.Kh2Qxh4+33.Qxh4Rxh4+34.Kg3Rh832...Rxh7and the extra pawns should win.31...Nc431...Na432.Qxh7Qd4+33.Bxd4Rxh734.Bf2And with the a-pawn falling, White is OK.32.Qf1Kd8!33.Qf2with a total mess which could go either way.33.Rf4Qg334.Rf3Qxh433...Kc733...h534.Rf4Qg635.Kh2e536.Rxc4dxc437.Bb6+Ke834.Rf4Qd1+35.Kh2Qh536.Rxc4dxc437.Bb6+30...Qc4!31.Qd20-0!-+Now Black is in control.32.Bd4Nd333.Qe3e5!34.Bxe534.Rxf8+Kxf835.Bxe5Nxe536.Qxe5Qxb4should win but was perhaps a better chance for White.37.g534...Rxf1+35.Bxf1Qxg4+36.Bg2Bf537.Bg3Be438.Kh2h638...Bxg2??39.Qe8#39.Bh3Qd140.Bd6Making the time control with just a second remaining, but he is completely busted.Qc2+41.Kg3Qxa242.Be6+Kh8!
A good game by Ding but pretty terrible by Gukesh. I've been trying to decide whether he played worse than Tigran Petrosian did in game one in 1963, given here last month. It's quite a close-run thing.But not42...Kh7??43.Qxe4+dxe444.Bxa242...Kh8Now if43.Qxe4Qf2+Gukesh resigned.0–1
Jonathan SpeelmanJonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.
ChessBase is re-releasing this timeless classic in the modern ChessBase Media format - complete with brand-new training features. Get ready to rediscover a masterpiece of chess instruction!
How do you play the Queen's Gambit Accepted? Does White have promising variations or can Black construct a water-tight repertoire? The Powerbook provides the answers based on 300 000 games, most of them played by engines.
The Queen's Gambit Accepted Powerbase 2025 is a database and contains a total of 11827 games from Mega 2025 and the Correspondence Database 2024, of which 240 are annotated.
Rossolimo-Moscow Powerbase 2025 is a database and contains a total of 10950 games from Mega 2025 and the Correspondence Database 2024, of which 612 are annotated.
€9.90
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.
Pop-up for detailed settings
We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies, analysis cookies and marketing cookies. You can decide which cookies to use by selecting the appropriate options below. Please note that your selection may affect the functionality of the service. Further information can be found in our privacy policy.
Technically required cookies
Technically required cookies: so that you can navigate and use the basic functions and store preferences.
Analysis Cookies
To help us determine how visitors interact with our website to improve the user experience.
Marketing-Cookies
To help us offer and evaluate relevant content and interesting and appropriate advertisement.