Jon Speelman: May miscellany

by Jonathan Speelman
6/2/2024 – Study composition is one of the aspects of chess that has been both most helped and most muddied by computers. Sometimes it turns out that a study is actually unsound or at least has dual(s), and sometimes there are complications regarding the 50-move rule, for example. But if you have an idea, then it has never been easier to test it, so that a process that would once have taken days can now be finalised in mere minutes. | Photo: John Upham

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

With a little help from my friends

[Note that Jon Speelman also looks at the content of the article in video format, here embedded at the end of the article.]

I thought that this time I’d look at some miscellaneous action from last month, starting with a study which I composed a few weeks ago apropos of a game I was watching online.

Jon Speelman
White to play and win

Please have a look at it if you like, or if you prefer, you can see the solution in the games file.

Study composition is one of the aspects of chess that has been both most helped and most muddied by computers. Sometimes it turns out that a study is actually unsound or at least has dual(s), and sometimes for example there are complications regarding the 50-move rule. But if you have an idea, then it has never been easier to test it, so that a process that would once have taken days or at least many hours can now be finalised in mere minutes.

The idea for this study came from a queen ending in Sharjah, which I was watching:

Puranik v. Tabatabaei, Sharjah (2024)
Black to play

Obviously a strong grandmaster is not going to play 75...c2?? in a million years, but it set me thinking about possible mating patterns with queen and pawn v. queen, and my musings led me to the end of the study above.

Having got your final position you work backwards, and it’s not too hard to imagine that Black will just have played QxN on c4 before the final series of checks. You then have to place the white queen on the board, presumably on the long diagonal, and the knight so that it can go to c4, and after some false starts — I can't remember exactly, but I think that I tried with the knight on d6 which allowed ...Qb6+ at a bad moment. I put it on e3, checked the tablebase and was told that Nc4 was the only move. Then it was a question of going back a little bit further and I realised that the knight had to block the g-file en route to e3 so in fact in the initial position it could also start on g2.

I then wondered how to get the king to c1 and was gratified when Bb2-c1 worked once the king was on b1. Why can’t White just play Qg1 mate when the king is on c1? Well, the black knight stops that. So after less than an hour I had a possible starting position and somewhat to my surprise the engine (this is an eight-piece position so you can’t yet use a tablebase) told me that it was sound.

John NunnI normally ring John Nunn on his birthday which is April 25th (Tony Miles was April 23rd), but for some reason thought that he was away and tried a couple of weeks later when he was actually in Slovenia at the European Senior Team Championships (where the three England teams — over 50, over 65 and women’s over 50 — all won golds). We had a quick chat and agreed to talk longer once he was home. In the interim, I’d composed this glorious study and I sent it to him asking whether, as I strongly suspected, it was anticipated.

When John opened the email, it took him less than two minutes to solve, and he then did find a total anticipation. I had only searched for the final position as I had it and neglected to reflect the board about the centre line between the d and the e-files...

Leonard Katsnelson, IX USSR Team Ch. (1971)
White to play and win

Again, please have a go at solving it if you like. As you’ll see, the final position is identical modulo the reflection.

I was very slightly disappointed that there was such a total anticipation, but it would have been extraordinary had somebody not done this one before, and I was delighted that it in fact won a first prize.

At the end of our conversation, John told me about his last-round game in Slovenia. It’s a real throwback to his prime when he was an utterly ferocious 1.e4 player, and I'm sure that you will enjoy it.

I’ll be back on July 7th.

New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.Ne3+
1.Bxb2 c1Q 1...Kc1 2.Bxb2+ Kb1! 2...Qxb2 3.Qg1+ Kd2 4.Nc4+ Kc3 5.Qg7+ 3.Bc1! Tablebases confirm that other moves lose. The "best" try is perhaps Qb8. Kxc1 3...Qb8 4.Nc4 4.Qg1 Qc8 4...Qb4 4...Qh2+ 5.Ke3 Qh3+ 6.Kd2 Qh2+ 7.Kd3 Qh3+ 8.Ne3! 5.Qe5 Qb7 5...Kxc1 6.Qa1+ Qb1 7.Qa3+ Kd1 8.Qd3+ Kc1 9.Qd2# 6.Qe1 Qf7+ 6...Ka2 7.Qe3 Qf7+ 7...Kb1 8.Na3+ Ka2 9.Nxc2 7...Qb4 8.Qa3+ Qxa3 9.Nxa3 8.Ke1 7.Bf4+ Ka2 8.Qa5+ Kb3 9.Qa3+ Kxc4 10.Qa2+ 3...Qb6 4.Qc3 3...Qb4 4.Nc4 4.Qg1 Qh4+ 5.Ke2 Qh5+ 6.Kd3 is apparently winning but Black has several checks. 4...Qc5+ 4...Ka2 5.Qb2+ Qxb2 6.Nxb2 is mate-in-29. 5.Ke1! Qb4+ 6.Nd2+ Kxc1 7.Qa1+ Qb1 8.Nb3# 4.Nc4! 4.Qa1+ Qb1 5.Qc3 Qa2 6.Nc4 Kb1! is a draw 7.Qb4+ Ka1 8.Qc3+ Kb1 9.Nd2+ Kc1 10.Nc4 Kb1 4...Qxc4 4...Kb1 5.Nd2+ Ka2 6.Nxb3 Kxb3 7.Qa1 4...Qb6+ 5.Nxb6 Kb1 6.Qg6 Ka1 7.Qc6 Kb1 8.Qb5+ Ka1 9.Qa4+ Kb1 10.Qb3+ Ka1 11.Qc3+ Kb1 12.Nc4 12.Qd3 Kb2 13.Qd2 Kb1 14.Nd5 c1Q 15.Nc3+ Ka1 16.Qa2# is another way. 12...c1Q 13.Na3+ 13.Nd2+?? Ka2 14.Qxc1 5.Qa1+ Kd2 6.Qe1+ Kd3 7.Qe3#
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Speelman,J--1–02024White to win
Puranik,A2631Tabatabaei,M27070–12024C507th Sharjah Masters 20245.4
Katsnelson,L--1–019711st Prize, IX USSR team champ
Nunn,J2552Antunac,G23321–02024B43TCh-EUR Senior +65 20249.1

Select an entry from the list to switch between games



In this course, we will learn how to identify passively placed pieces in any given situation and how to improve their health by bringing them into active squares.


Links


Jonathan Speelman, born in 1956, studied mathematics but became a professional chess player in 1977. He was a member of the English Olympic team from 1980–2006 and three times British Champion. He played twice in Candidates Tournaments, reaching the semi-final in 1989. He twice seconded a World Championship challenger: Nigel Short and then Viswanathan Anand against Garry Kasparov in London 1993 and New York 1995.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.