Youth ravages Sharjah Masters

by André Schulz
4/16/2018 – The 2nd Sharjah Chess Masters is currently taking place in the UAE. Nearly 130 players compete for the first prize of $ 15,000, including five players over 2700. After six rounds, the young Iranian star Parham Maghsoodloo (pictured) is in the clear lead and is the man to beat (no one has!). | Photo: Niklesh Jain

ChessBase 14 Download ChessBase 14 Download

Everyone uses ChessBase, from the World Champion to the amateur next door. Start your personal success story with ChessBase 14 and enjoy your chess even more!


Along with the ChessBase 14 program you can access the Live Database of 8 million games, and receive three months of free ChesssBase Account Premium membership and all of our online apps! Have a look today!

More...

The 2nd Sharjah Chess Masters

According to popular theory, chess was invented in India was around 500 CE and spread from there in all directions. On the way to Europe, Persia was the next stop. When the Arabs conquered Persia in the 7th century, the game of chess was also introduced to the Arab countries. At first, it was highly valued, but then banned for religious reasons as it was presumed to be equivalent to gambling. 

The development of tournament chess moved beyond the Arab world long ago, but in recent years chess has been rediscovered there and since then it has been rapidly advancing. Strong top players were hired as coaches, the chess clubs (in the United Arab Emirates, for example), reside in palace-like buildings, and tournaments are regularly held that range from good to very high. 

After the chess boomed in the Emirates, then in Iran, even Saudi Arabia recently jumped on the chess as part of the modernization and opening of the country as it hosted the last World Blitz and Rapid Championship. Previously, chess was virtually non-existent in Saudi Arabia. The country's rankings include just 47 players. In Iran, things are looking very different. Iran now ranks 28th in the country ranking, not far from Norway and ahead of Italy or Sweden.

The best players in the country are also still quite young. Five players in the top ten are under 20 years old. Their Elo ratings may not seem so impressive at first glance, but like some other chess-developing countries, Iranian players are underrated because of lack of tournament participation.

See Iran ranking list...

Among the newer tournaments in the region is the Sharjah Masters, held this year for the second time. Sharjah connects to Dubai on the Gulf Coast in the north. The chess club has its domicile in a large dedicated building on a main road, the E88. Next door is a McDonalds. Next to it a gas station. Sounds a lot like your typical German highway...except the chess club, of course.

Google Maps

The Sharjah chess and cultural centre via Google Streetview

The prize fund of the tournament is $60,000. First prize: $15,000. The tournament is under the patronage of HH Sheikh Dr. Sultan bin Mohammad Al Qasimi, the head of government of the country.  

With Wang Hao, Yuriy Kryvoruchko, Vladislav Artemiev, Arkady Naiditsch, Bassem Amin and Pavel Eljanov, six players are over 2700, at the top of a list of about 30 other grandmasters. Like the recent Dubai Open, the bulk of the field is made up of Indian players, with nearly fifty. In comparison comparable European Opens, Sharjah is just around the corner from India. 

Iran is represented by nine players. Parham Maghsoodloo (18 years, number one in the country), Mohammad Amin Tabatabaei (17, and number two) and Alireza Firouzja (15, and third) lead the internal rankings.

Speaking of young people: in the field of the Sharjah Opens, you will find two of the world's best 14-year-olds: Nodirbek Abdusattorov (Uzbekistan) and Bibissara Assaubayeva (Russia). 

After five rounds, Sethuraman, the eldest of the Indian contingent, shared the lead with Maghsoodloo. Both players had won all their games so far. Parham Maghsoodloo defeated none other than Elo favourite Wang Hao in round five.

 

Maghsoodloo had survived massive pressure from Wang in the middlegame and battled back to equal. Now in this tricky endgame, Wang really needed to play Bd7 to put the breaks on black's pawns. After 37.Rb3 e4 the pawns are getting serious. Now 38.Bd7 comes too late. Black's pieces are too active and he won a dozen moves later.

The strength of the young Uzbek player Nodirbek Abdusattorov was felt in the third round by Arkadij Naiditsch:

 

The sixth round clash between the leaders Maghsoodloo and Sethuraman was quite interesting for fans of the symmetrical English Rubinstein. 

 

The "normal" moves for white are 10.Rac1 or 10.d3, but Maghsoodloo's move has also been played and has the point of "threatening" to lop off the knight on c6. Normally White doesn't want to give up his fianchettoed bishop, but this is an exception. For this reason 10...Bd7 is the most common reply. Sethuraman instead played the novelty 10...Be6 and there followed 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.Nf3 with an equal but double-edged position. Soon after, the young Iranian initiates a series of mass exchanges into a queen and rook ending.

 

Move the pieces on the live diagram!

20.Bxc5 Nxc5 21.Nxc5 Bxf3 22.exf3 Bxc5 23.Rxc5 Qxd3 24.Kg2 Rxc5 25.Qxc5 Qa6.

White is better due to the weak black pawn on c6 which becomes a target. 

 

Black is tied down but is still holding after 41...Rd8. Unfortunately, despite the added time, Sethuraman missed a tactical shot and played 41...Kh7 in under a minute. Now 42.Qg6+! pins the f6 pawn, such that 42...Kh8 43.Rxe5 fxe5 44.Qxd6 left white with a clearly winning queen endgame. Maghsoodloo forced off the queens just five moves later and earned a handshake, leaving him as the sole leader by a full point, still undefeated, and gaining a boatload of rating points.

Results of the sixth round

Name Pts. Result Pts. Name
Maghsoodloo Parham 5 1 - 0 5 Sethuraman S.P.
Naiditsch Arkadij 4 1 - 0 4 Kovalev Vladislav
Petrosian Tigran L. 4 ½ - ½ 4 Eljanov Pavel
Iturrizaga Bonelli Eduardo 4 ½ - ½ 4 Inarkiev Ernesto
Tabatabaei M.Amin 4 0 - 1 4 Jones Gawain C B
Abdusattorov Nodirbek 4 ½ - ½ 4 Adhiban B.
Safarli Eltaj 4 1 - 0 4 Vignesh N R
Grandelius Nils 4 0 - 1 4 Dimakiling Oliver
Kryvoruchko Yuriy 1 - 0 4 Soumya Swaminathan
Narayanan.S.L 0 - 1 Wang Hao

Standings after six rounds (top 20)

Rk. Name Pts.  TB1 
1 Maghsoodloo Parham 6,0 0,0
2 Sethuraman S.P. 5,0 0,0
3 Safarli Eltaj 5,0 0,0
4 Naiditsch Arkadij 5,0 0,0
5 Dimakiling Oliver 5,0 0,0
6 Jones Gawain C B 5,0 0,0
7 Iturrizaga Bonelli Eduardo 4,5 0,0
8 Artemiev Vladislav 4,5 0,0
  Abdusattorov Nodirbek 4,5 0,0
10 Wang Hao 4,5 0,0
11 Adhiban B. 4,5 0,0
12 Firouzja Alireza 4,5 0,0
13 Petrosian Tigran L. 4,5 0,0
14 Kryvoruchko Yuriy 4,5 0,0
15 Eljanov Pavel 4,5 0,0
  Inarkiev Ernesto 4,5 0,0
17 Jumabayev Rinat 4,5 0,0
18 Kovalev Vladislav 4,0 0,0
19 Yakubboev Nodirbek 4,0 0,0
20 Vishnu Prasanna. V 4,0 0,0

...129 Players

All available games

 

Translation from German and additional reporting: Macauley Peterson

Correction April 17: Removed reference to "the first move after time control" since Sharjah uses 90 minutes for the entire game, plus a 30-second increment starting from move one. Maghsoodloo, Tabatabaei, and Firouzja, are actually the top 3 in Iran (and not 2-4 as originally written).

Links



André Schulz started working for ChessBase in 1991 and is an editor of ChessBase News.
Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Fario Fario 4/23/2018 10:29
Folks,
Why did you stop the coverage on this tournament? It had a very interesting outcome with Parham Maghsoodloo gaining 8/9 final score.
Best regards,
Fario
original sin original sin 4/18/2018 11:51
Persian gulf. Iran's powerful hero "Parham Maghsood Lu"
An athlete never plays a political game
Ahriman Ahriman 4/17/2018 06:35
@macauley , Thank you for the correction.
macauley macauley 4/17/2018 03:17
@daftarche - Yes, there is some bug in the internal updating we are investigating. Thanks.

@milanam - I checked with several native speakers who say that in German "Arabischen Golf" is quite a common geographic description. But indeed that is not the case in English. Again that was a translation error, not in any way an editorial / political decision.

As far as I'm aware, the only comments that were moderated by an editor were two (neither of which were yours) that were clearly against our "discussion rules" (https://en.chessbase.com/pages/discussion-rules). This is rarely necessary, although sometimes comments are automatically queued for moderation and would have to be manually switched on. None have been "deleted" - editors can see and do review all comments.

However, the comments section is primarily meant for context-relevant discussion among readers, which this is not. We also offer the "feedback to the editors" page for everything else (e.g. https://en.chessbase.com/feedback/sharjah-masters-2018) and we review all feedback we receive and even respond personally in many cases (time permitting). In fact, if you have a specific criticism for an author/editor, then then feedback form is a more reliable way to communicate it than the comments section. Thanks for your interest.
daftarche daftarche 4/17/2018 12:30
That Iran ranking list does not seem to be updated since 4 months ago.
milanam milanam 4/17/2018 12:02
@maculey I do not think that in German language such a term exists!! Even in the arab world it did not exist before 70s! This body of water has a unique name everywhere!!Please do not consider your readers as kids. Just accept the mistake. What do you mean by it is known in Germany as Arabischen Golf? The author has changed a historical name.

My 2 comments and 2 comments of another reader were deleted. My last comment where I asked why you had deleted my comments can not be seen. I could see them for 6 hours then suddenly they disappeared. I have the screenshot of those comments. You returned only one of my comments.
macauley macauley 4/17/2018 11:20
@chesscounter - Thanks corrected.
@Ahriman - This was a translation from German where it is actually known as "Arabischen Golf". There was no political motivation or intent. Changed to "UAE", since that is surely non-controversial.
@milanam - No comments were deleted. Some comments are automatically moderated and so do not appear, but editors read all of them. Thanks for your understanding.
Ahriman Ahriman 4/17/2018 09:35
please dont write about the history of chess when you dont know the name of the gulf."THE PERSIAN GULF"
mehrab2015 mehrab2015 4/17/2018 09:32
It has been and will always remain Persian Gulf
sayros87 sayros87 4/17/2018 09:04
there are couple of mistakes in this article.
Parham ranked number 1 and 2 in his country
There is no added time on move 40 in this tournament.
sad that you did not check basic facts
chesscounter chesscounter 4/17/2018 08:07
In this tournament there is no added time on move 40. 90 min plus 30 sec for the whole game
milanam milanam 4/17/2018 03:47
Mr André Schulz please look at your school geography book. The name of this body of water has been Persian gulf for thousands of years. You have also mentioned the word "Gulf" once. Is it just because you do not want to annoy the host country that wants to change the name of this body of water to the fake name?

Why does this valuable website want to enter this political games by changing the historical name of a body of water?. The arabs around the Persian gulf want to change the name because of hate. Please do not enter these racist games by doing such cheap things. You are mentioning victories of an Iranian and then you enter a cheap political and racist game that arabs are doing for the last 50 years by spending millions of dollars to change a historical name.

The name you have mentioned never existed before 70s. I really demand you to correct this or give an explanation,
1