Senior Team Champions: USA and Russia

by Alex Yermolinsky
7/18/2018 – The participants rave about a well-organized Senior World Team Championship of seniors in Radebeul, Germany. In the 65+ section, the Russian team won gold. The 50+ category was more competitive, but in the end, the favourites from the USA pulled ahead. GM ALEX YERMOLINSKY reports. | Photo: Karsten Wieland

Winning starts with what you know
The new version 18 offers completely new possibilities for chess training and analysis: playing style analysis, search for strategic themes, access to 6 billion Lichess games, player preparation by matching Lichess games, download Chess.com games with built-in API, built-in cloud engine and much more.

USA wins 50+

All's well that ends well, our captain and team leader Alexander Shabalov posted on our WhatsApp group as the author of these words was about to board a Minneapolis-bound plane at Frankfurt Airport. My plans were made far in advance, and my teammates were aware they would have to cover for me in the last round. (The bad things is, I'm MIA on the Championship photo!) But cover they did, defeating Canada by the count 3-1.

Last round team photo

The North American derby: USA vs Canada

It wouldn't have been enough, however, had the English team not stumbled at the finish line by losing to Germany 1. The decisive margin was provided by IM Karsten Volke who beat James Plaskett in a smooth game. The Germans actually held an advantage on all boards except for board one, where GMs Schlosser and Speelman drew quickly.

Considering that fact that even a tie in that match would see our team finishing first on tie-breaks (most board points scored), it wasn't really such a nail-biting wait for the US team. My teammates took advantage of the free hours between the end of their games and the closing ceremony to take another short car trip to downtown Dresden.

Final standings

Pl. Mannschaft ELO Man.Pkt. Brt.Pkt. SoBerg
1. USA United States   16:2 28 310
1.   Alexander Shabalov 2567 7.5:0.5 43.5 37.25
2.   Joel Benjamin 2544 6:2 46.5 34.5
3.   Jaan Ehlvest 2536 5.5:2.5 47.5 30.25
4.   Alex Yermolinsky 2505 6:1 44 29.25
5.   Sergey Kudrin 2468 3:2 42.5 17.5
2. ENG England 1   15:3 26.5 282.5
1.   Jon S Speelman 2493 4.5:2.5 46.5 24
2.   John M Emms 2488 5:2 45.5 26.75
3.   H James Plaskett 2455 5.5:2.5 44.5 27.75
4.   Mark L Hebden 2423 5:2 47 27.25
5.   Keith C Arkell 2406 6.5:0.5 43.5 30.5
3. GER Lasker Schachstiftung GK   15:3 26 268.5
1.   Alexander Graf 2561 6:2 43.5 28.25
2.   Artur Jussupow 2580 5:3 44.5 25
3.   Felix Levin 2468 6.5:1.5 43.5 33.75
4.   Jakob Meister 2432 6:2 47 30.75
5.   Dr. Gerhard Koehler 2181 2.5:1.5 39.5 12.5
4. GER Germany 1   14:4 24.5 245.5
1.   Philipp Schlosser 2501 6:3 41 26
2.   Uwe Boensch 2560 4.5:2.5 44 22.5
3.   Klaus Bischoff 2510 4:2 45 19.5
4.   Karsten Volke 2474 5:2 43.5 25.5
5.   Raj Tischbierek 2436 5:2 47 29.25
5. GER Thüringen   13:5 23 226
1.   Peter Enders 2445 5.5:3.5 45 24
2.   Thomas Paehtz 2347 3.5:1.5 42 16.5
3.   Joachim Brueggemann 2293 6.5:2.5 41.5 30.75
4.   Thomas Casper 2354 5:2 43.5 26.75
5.   Rudolf Ruether 2118 2.5:3.5 44 11.5

...67 Teams

In terms of individual board winners, Shabalov won on first board with 7½/8, and I captured the fourth board with 6 out of 7. Aside from losing against England in Round 4, the US team won their remaining matches by at least the count of 3 : 1, including decisive wins over the Lasker team and Germany 1, where the score was 3½ : ½.

The English played very well, and they could have won it, but there's no doubt in my mind our team was the class of the field.

Shabalov

Alexander Shabalov had a stellar event

Going back to round-by-round coverage, I mention that Round 7 didn't give us any grounds for optimism. Both teams that were ahead of us, England 1 and Lasker Schachstiftung, whitewashed their opponents, while we surrendered one point to the Thuringen team thanks to a rare Ehlvest loss.

Unfazed, we took a car ride to one of the numerous castles in the Dresden area and surveyed the hunting grounds about.

Team photo

At the castle | Photo: Alex Yermolinsky

The next day was to answer if we were to stay in contention. The US team rose to the occasion by defeating the Lasker team. The only draw was given on board three, where Ehlvest couldn't get the game off the ground against the determined Felix Levin. The rest of the games went massively our way.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.f3 0-0 6.Be3 Nc6 7.Nge2 a6 8.Qd2 Na5!? It is funny how this game, or, even more particularly, this move (objectively not such a great one), finally made me realize that i am playing in World Seniors. I received so many compliments and comments from other players about the virtues of Na5 that it became blatantly clear - for most of them modern theory stopped developing about 20 years ago.Of course, currently 8...Na5 is probably even more popular than 8...Rb8. 9.Nc1 Nd7
10.Nb3 very solid continuation from a seasoned professional which took him way too much time (about 50 min). The reason was, as Alexander himself explained it after the game, that he simply could not believe that this move (Na5) exists and was actively looking for a direct refutation. During the game i interpreted his long thought a little different. by the way it is very easy to go wrong with white as the following game shown. 10.Be2 c5 11.0-0 cxd4 12.Bxd4 Ne5 13.b3 Nac6 14.Be3 Qa5 and yes, it is exactly here that visibly frustrated Aman stopped the clock ...0-1 (14) Hambleton,A (2463)-Shabalov,A (2557) Philadelphia 2013 10.b4 My pregame preparation was base on the following game Nc6 11.Rb1 e5 12.d5 Nd4 13.Nb3 Nxb3 14.Rxb3 a5 15.a3 axb4 16.axb4 Ra1+ 17.Rb1 Rxb1+ 18.Nxb1 i came up with some improvements for black and thought that Alex was also trying to find ways to avoid some nasty opening surprise. However during our conversation he failed to remember this game at all! It was only until much later that it dawned on me: Felix Graf and Alexander Graf are two different players.Welcome to Senior curcuit! f5 19.Nc3 Nf6 20.exf5 gxf5 21.Be2 Qe8 22.0-0 Qg6 23.Bd3 Bd7 24.c5 Kh8 25.Kh1 Qh5 26.b5 dxc5 27.Bxc5 Re8 28.Re1 b6 29.Bf2 Bh6 30.Be3 Bf8 31.Bg5 Ng8 32.g4 fxg4 33.Ne4 gxf3 34.Rg1 Bg7 35.d6 cxd6 36.Bc4 Be6 37.Nxd6 Bxc4 38.Nxc4 Rf8 39.Be3 Bh6 40.Bxh6 Nxh6 41.Qd6 Qf7 42.Qxe5+ Qf6 43.Rf1 Qxe5 44.Nxe5 Rf5 45.Nxf3 Rxb5 46.Nd4 Rb2 47.Ne6 b5 48.Rf8+ Ng8 49.Rf7 Re2 50.Nd4 Re7 1/2-1/2 (50) Graf,F (2479)-Vocaturo,D (2587) Barcelona 2014 10...c5 11.Be2 Nxb3 12.axb3 cxd4 13.Bxd4 Nc5! this is a clear improvement on my own game 13...Bxd4 14.Qxd4 Nc5 15.Ra3 Be6 15...e5 16.Qe3 Ne6 17.0-0 Bd7 18.Nd5 Bc6 19.Bd3 Bxd5 20.exd5 Nd4 21.f4 f6 16.b4 Nd7 17.Kf2 Rc8 18.Nd5 Ne5 18...Bxd5 19.exd5 Re8 20.f4 e5 21.dxe6 Rxe6 22.Bf3 b5 23.b3 d5‼ 19.Re3 f6 20.Rd1 Bf7 21.f4 Kg7 21...Nc6 22.Qc3 e5 23.Kg1 Be6= 22.c5 Rc6 22...Nd7 23.cxd6 e5 24.Qa7 Bxd5 25.Rxd5 exf4 26.Rc3 Rxc3 27.bxc3 Rf7 28.Qd4 23.cxd6 Qxd6 24.fxe5 fxe5 25.Qa7 Bxd5+ 26.Kg1 Qxb4 27.exd5 Rb6 28.Rxe5 Qc5+ 29.Kh1 Rf2 30.Re6 1-0 (30) Laznicka,V (2679)-Shabalov,A (2501) Arlington, Virginia 2014 14.Bxg7 14.Ra3!? 14...Kxg7 15.Ra3 Be6 16.Qd4+?! f6 17.b4 Nd7 18.0-0 Ne5 19.Nd5 Nc6 20.Qc3 White's inaccuracy on move 16 forces this ugly retreat and black seizes the initiative. Rc8 21.Kh1 Bf7 22.f4 e6 23.Ne3 e5 24.Nc2 Qe7 25.Qd2 exf4 26.Rxf4 Qe5 27.b3 Be6
It may look like a preparation for f6-f5, but in fact black sets up a cheap trap. In a very serious time trouble the leader of Lasker Chess Club steps right into it. 28.Ra1 Nxb4‼ the cheap shot , of course, but the funny one. It is a bad habit to overload your pieces. 29.Nd4 Nc6 30.Nxe6+ Qxe6 31.Rd1 Rcd8 32.Rf3? Giving up the second pawn was not necessary.The game is over Qxe4 33.Re3 Qf5 34.Bf3 Rd7 35.Bxc6 bxc6 36.Rd3 Rfd8 37.h3 d5 38.Rd4 Re7 39.Qa5 Rde8 40.cxd5 Qf2! The simplest solution.Black returns extra material for a mating attack 41.R4d3 Re1+ 42.Rxe1 Rxe1+ 43.Kh2 Qf4+ followed by Re3, so white resigns.
0–1
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Graf,A2561Shabalov,A25670–12018E83World Senior Team Ch8

Then there was a nice win for Benjamin over Jussupow. After the game, Joel expressed his surprise at Artur's opening choice of a horribly passive line in the French Defense. I hoped to get Joel's notes to the game, but I guess Daddy was missed too much for the last couple of weeks for the kids (9 and 7) to let him sit at chess the first day back home.

I chipped in with a solid effort of my own.

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 In my quick preparation I managed to correctly guess the opening. The question remained which line to play against it. 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 c5 6.0-0 a6
An over-the-board decision. 7.Bd3!? I thought Jakob would be prepared to face my usual 7.Bb3 7.a4 Nc6 8.Qe2 Qc7!? 7...Nc6 Just as with the other bishop move the point of an unprovoked retreat is to meet 7...b5 with 8.a4! 8.Nc3 Qc7?! I don't think this works as well as in similar lines where White plays a2-a4. However, I wasn't too surpised with this move. A quick survey of Jakob's games had shown that he isn't very keen on playing against the IQP, which is rather strange for a QGA player. 8...cxd4 9.exd4 Be7 10.Bg5 0-0 is best. Against 11.Rc1 Black can depend on h6 but rather not 11...Nb4 as 12.Bb1 b5 13.a3 Nbd5 14.Nxd5 Nxd5 15.Qd3 g6 16.Bh6 Re8 17.Ne5 Bb7 18.Qf3 Bf6 19.Be4 Qe7 20.Bxd5! Bxd5 21.Qf4 brought White success in Giri-Laznicka, 2010 - one of the early games that showcased an exceptional talent of then 16-year-old player. 12.Bh4 Nh5 9.Qe2 I decided to disperse with unnecessary pawn moves. After the game I learned that 9.a3 b6 10.dxc5 bxc5 11.Ne4 Be7 12.Bd2 Bb7 13.Bc3 was good enough for Kasparov against Kamsky back in 1994 9...Bd6? Gifting White another tempo is just too much. 9...b6 10.Bd2 Bb7 11.Rac1 Be7 12.dxc5 bxc5 13.Ne4 Nd7 14.Bc3 0-0 Sokolov-Wan Vely, 1997. I have no idea how Loek survived this. 10.dxc5 Bxc5
Look, White took back on c4 in one move, while the black bishop took two steps, plus the white queen is better positioned. Add all that up, and White can claim a serious edge in a symmetrical pawn structure. 11.Bd2 Or 11.Ne4 right away. 11...Bd7 12.Rac1 Bd6 13.Ne4 Nxe4 14.Bxe4 f5 15.Bc2 Upon seeing f7-f5 I preferred a slow treatment rather than the hasty 15.Bxc6 Bxc6 16.e4 fxe4 17.Nd4 Bxh2+ 18.Kh1 Be5 19.Nxc6 bxc6 20.Qxe4 0-0 21.b3 where White stands better but may not be able to convert. 15...0-0 During the game I wondered about 15...0-0-0!? What does Black have to lose anyway? 16.Bb3 Rae8 17.Rfd1 Bc8 18.h3
Another one of those patented Grandmaster waiting moves. After doing this for 40+ years, it almost becomes you to play chess like this. 18...Qe7 19.e4 f4 20.e5 Bb8 21.Qe4 g5 22.Bc3 Qg7 23.Ba4 Knowing the game was in hand I let down a bit and missed some tactics (fortunately, for myself only) For example, 23.Bb4 was there: Nxb4 23...Rf7 24.Rxc6 bxc6 25.Qxc6 24.Rxc8 Rxc8 25.Bxe6+ Kh8 26.Bxc8 23...Kh8 24.Nd4!
24...Ne7 It looks strange, but in reality Black hardly had any better choices. 24...Bxe5 25.Nxc6 Bxc3 26.Rxc3 bxc6 27.Qxc6 catches the black pieces hampered by a weak back rank: Bb7 28.Qxe8 Rxe8 29.Bxe8 Bd5 30.Bc6 Qe5 31.Bxd5 exd5 32.Rc5 Qxb2 33.Rdxd5 25.Bxe8 Rxe8 26.Bb4 It's curtains already. Ng6 26...Nd5 27.Bd6 Ba7 28.Rxc8 Rxc8 29.Nxe6 27.Bd6 Once again, 27.Rxc8 Rxc8 28.Nxe6 Qg8 29.Nxg5 was there. 27...Bd7 28.Qxb7 Bxd6 29.exd6 e5 30.Rc7 Nf8 31.Nf5 Qf7 32.Ne7 Qxa2 33.Qd5 Qxd5 34.Rxd5 Kg7 35.Rxe5 Kf6 36.Re1 Rd8 37.Nc6 Bxc6 38.Rxc6 a5 He resigned before I could land my only tactical blow in the game. 38...a5 39.Re8 was what I had in mind.
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Yermolinsky,A2505Meister,J24321–02018D27World Senior Team Ch8

This crushing win all but assured the US team of finishing at least second. The rest of the day was split between watching the third-place match of the World Cup and a nice dinner in a downtown Dresden cafe “Alyonushka”, which features Russian cuisine.

The US Team headquarters | Photo: Alex Yermolinsky

Actually, I got lucky with my choice of room. Having what used to be called a "Murphy bed" proved useful when my room was used for team gatherings and meals.

On the morning of the last round, Shabalov drove me to Dresden Hauptbahnhof, where I boarded a fast train to Frankfurt, leaving my teammates to finish the business. 

 
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Qc7 My opponents choice was an easy guess - David has 25 years history with this line and at this tender age changes aren't coming too often. 6.Be3 a6 7.f4 7.Qf3 is a top fashion line these days. However the line white choses in this game is not without poison. 7...b5 8.Bd3 Bb7 8...Nxd4 9.Bxd4 Qxf4 10.Rf1 is suicidal. 9.Nb3 d6 10.Qf3 Nf6 11.0-0 Be7
12.Qh3 First real intersection for white. Other than the text white has two ways to prevent Nb4 12.a4 12.a3 12...Nb4 This is how black was dealing with this setup last century. 12...h5 is the modern way 13.Rac1 White openly demonstrates that he wants to save a tempo on a2-a3 move. 13.a3 Nxd3 14.cxd3 0-0 15.Nd4 Rac8 16.Rf3 Rfe8 17.Raf1 Bf8 18.Rg3 g6 19.f5 exf5 20.Nxf5 h5 21.Bd4 Re6 22.Ne3 Ne8 23.Ncd5 Qd8 24.Nf4 Re5 25.Nxg6 fxg6 26.Bxe5 Kh7 27.Rxg6 Kxg6 28.Qf5+ Kh6 29.Qxf8+ 1-0 (29) Mitkov,N (2461)-Van Foreest,J (2629) chess.com INT 2018 13...Nxd3 13...0-0!? Black does not have to comply 14.cxd3 Qd7? allowing the knight on a5 is wrong. 14...Qd8!? 15.Na5 0-0 16.f5 exf5 17.Rxf5 Objectively 17.Qxf5 Qxf5 18.Rxf5 Bc8 19.Nc6 Bd8 20.Rf3 is stronger, but i did not feel like playing the endgame in the final round 17...b4 18.Ne2 Rac8!
Excellent choice by David. Now white faces a tough choice again 19.Re1 the idea of 19.Rff1! Qxh3 20.gxh3 Ba8 21.Nd4 and the knight goes to c6 does not occur to me. 19...Ba8 20.Bd4 d5 21.e5 Ne8 22.Nf4 Nc7 23.Nb3?! white unwillingless to play any endgame could have lead to problems. 23.e6 Nxe6 24.Nxe6 fxe6 25.Rxf8+ Bxf8 26.Qxe6+ is an easy win due to tragicomic bishop on a8. 23...Ne6 24.Rh5 h6 25.Be3
25...Rc7 Black could have made white to pay for his previous mistakes with 25...d4 26.Nxd4 Bg5! and white has to play precise to hold. 26.Qg3 Kh7 26...d4 27.Nxe6 fxe6 28.Bxh6 27.Nd4 Nxf4? the final mistake. Black position is hard to hold anyway. 27...Bc5 28.Ndxe6 Bxe3+ 29.Rxe3 Rc1+ 30.Kf2 fxe6 31.Rxh6+ Kg8 32.Rf6 28.Qxf4 Bc5 29.Rxh6+ gxh6 30.Qxh6+ Kg8 31.Qg5+ Kh7 32.Nf5 f6 33.Qh6+ Kg8 34.Bxc5
34...Qxf5 34...Rxc5 35.exf6 is also hopeless. 35.Qxf8+ Kh7 36.exf6 d4 37.Re7+ Rxe7 38.Qxe7+
1–0
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.
WhiteEloWBlackEloBResYearECOEventRnd
Shabalov,A2567Cummings,D23361–02018B82World Senior Team Ch9

The Sicilian has been known for decades as the most reliable way for Black to obtain an unbalanced but good position. Among the most popular Sicilians at the top level the two that certainly stand out are the Najdorf and the Paulsen.


All games

 
Loading...
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.

The World Cup 65+ Russia wins with 18 : 0

The over 65 age group was a clear and unambiguous affair. The Russian team won with 9 wins and 18 : 0 points tally. The gap to the following teams, St. Petersburg and Germany 1 is a whopping four points. "Germany 2" with Vlastimil Hort on board 1 finished fourth.

The winners of the 65+ group, Russia in the back row | Karsten Wieland

Final standings

Pl. Mannschaft ELO Man.Pkt. Brt.Pkt. SoBerg
1. RUS Russia   18:0 27 282
1.   Evgeny Sveshnikov 2464 7.5:1.5 41 33.75
2.   Yuri S Balashov 2423 5.5:1.5 42.5 25.75
3.   Nukhim Rashkovsky 2483 5.5:1.5 43 27
4.   Vladimir V Zhelnin 2453 3.5:2.5 44 18.5
5.   Nikolai Pushkov 2311 5:2 46 26.25
2. RUS Saint-Petersburg   14:4 23.5 242.5
1.   Vadim Z Faibisovich 2312 5:4 41 24.25
2.   Nikolai M. Mishuchkov 2311 5:4 45 25.5
3.   Vladimir I Karasev 2337 6:3 45.5 31.75
4.   Vladimir Shushpanov 2198 7.5:1.5 39.5 31
3. GER Germany 2   14:4 22 233.5
1.   Jefim Rotstein 2318 4:4 44 20
2.   Yuri Boidman 2358 7.5:1.5 40.5 34.75
3.   Anatoly Donchenko 2301 2.5:3.5 41 13.25
4.   Boris Khanukov 2273 5:3 42 24.25
5.   Boris Gruzmann 2176 3:2 43 12.25
4. GER Germany 1   13:5 22 212.5
1.   Vlastimil Hort 2421 5.5:2.5 42 24.5
2.   Bodo Schmidt 2344 5:4 44.5 26
3.   Stephan Buchal 2329 4:4 45 19.5
4.   Ulrich Schulze 2313 5.5:1.5 45 25.5
5.   Juergen Haakert 2302 2:2 36.5 9
5. ENG England 1   13:5 21.5 224
1.   Robert Bellin 2333 3.5:4.5 45 17.75
2.   Stephen H Berry 2298 4:3 42 20.5
3.   Nigel E Povah 2245 7:1 41 33.25
4.   Anthony J Stebbings 2257 5:2 45 25
5.   Roger Emerson 2211 2:4 40 9.75
6. GER Schwäbische Franken   13:5 21 196.5
1.   Klaus Klundt 2318 5:4 37 22.75
2.   Rainer Oechslein 2228 3.5:3.5 42 15.5
3.   Prof. Dr. Peter Krauseneck 2147 4.5:2.5 38.5 19.25
4.   Dr. Hubert Seibold 2113 4:3 42 19.75
5.   Horst Weisenburger 2096 4:2 41.5 17
7. FRA France   12:6 24.5 248.5
1.   Anatoly Vaisser 2502 5.5:1.5 45 30.25
2.   Mehrshad Sharif 2353 5.5:1.5 39.5 24
3.   Jean-Luc Seret 2353 3.5:3.5 41.5 18.25
4.   Nicolas Giffard 2260 5:2 41 22.5
5.   Christophe Bernard 2253 5:3 41.5 23.75

...61 Teams

All games

 
Loading...
New ...
Open...
Share...
Layout...
Flip Board
Settings
MoveNResultEloPlayers
Replay and check the LiveBook here
  • Start an analysis engine:
  • Try maximizing the board:
  • Use the four cursor keys to replay the game. Make moves to analyse yourself.
  • Press Ctrl-B to rotate the board.
  • Drag the split bars between window panes.
  • Download&Clip PGN/GIF/FEN/QR Codes. Share the game.
  • Games viewed here will automatically be stored in your cloud clipboard (if you are logged in). Use the cloud clipboard also in ChessBase.
  • Create an account to access the games cloud.

Links


Yermo is enjoying his fifties. Lives in South Dakota, 600 miles way from the nearest grandmaster. Between his chess work online he plays snooker and spends time outdoors - happy as a clam.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

We use cookies and comparable technologies to provide certain functions, to improve the user experience and to offer interest-oriented content. Depending on their intended use, analysis cookies and marketing cookies may be used in addition to technically required cookies. Here you can make detailed settings or revoke your consent (if necessary partially) with effect for the future. Further information can be found in our data protection declaration.