Proposal: A new World Championship format

by Frederic Friedel
11/4/2019 – When Paul Morphy played Adolf Anderssen in 1858, only two games of the eleven in total were drawn. Steinitz vs Lasker in 1894 produced four draws in 19 games, but when Capablanca played Lasker in 1921 there were already ten draws in 14 games. In the Carlsen-Caruana match last year all twelve regular games were drawn, so the title had to be decided in tiebreaks. But such tiebreaks involve rapid chess game, blitz and even the ominous Armageddon. Is there a way to decide the World Championship in classical games only? Problemist Werner Keym has proposed a format that does exactly this. What do you think?

Komodo Chess 14 Komodo Chess 14

Last year Komodo won the world championship title on two occasions and can call itself "2019 World Computer Chess Champion" and "2019 World Chess Software Champion". And the current Komodo 14 has been clearly improved over its predecessor!

More...

Decide the World Championship by classical chess

The tie-break systems that are currently used in chess are designed to break ties between players who have the same total number of points after the last round. This is especially necessary when prizes such as titles, trophies, or qualification for another tournament cannot be shared. And of course in the World Championship, where there is a title to be awarded. But here the system used to break a tie between two players is either:

  1. the challenger needs to win; or
  2. rapid and blitz games, including the ominous Armageddon.

Nobody cheers when a World Championship takes course, it did last year.

Wikipedia describes how it continued: "Before the tiebreak, it was expected that Carlsen would be advantaged because of his prowess at rapid time controls. Although the rating gap between Carlsen and Caruana in classical chess was a mere 3 points, in rapid chess it was 91 points. However, Carlsen's showing in the classical games, and the way in which he offered a draw in a favourable position in game 12 led Kasparov to opine that Carlsen appeared to be losing his nerve. But this was the result:

  • Game 01: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen
  • Game 02: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana 
  • Game 03: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen
  • Game 04: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana
  • Game 05: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen
  • Game 06: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana
  • Game 07: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana
  • Game 08: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen
  • Game 09: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana
  • Game 10: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen
  • Game 11: Carlsen ½–½ Caruana
  • Game 12: Caruana ½–½ Carlsen

Tie-break games

  • Game 13: Carlsen 1–0 Caruana, 
  • Game 14: Caruana 0–1 Carlsen
  • Game 15: Carlsen 1–0 Caruana

Both players were gracious in the press conference after the match, and paid tribute to their opponent. Caruana said the results showed that Carlsen is the strongest player in the world, while Carlsen said Caruana had just as much right as he has to call himself the best player in the world in classical chess. Carlsen's strategy to draw game 12 and win the tiebreaks had been vindicated, a point he emphasized in the press conference. Both players recognized that the other was a formidable opponent. Carlsen said he was very happy for having overcome such a strong obstacle, and would work to get better in the future. For his part, Caruana lamented the fact that one needs to find one's best form to win a tiebreak, which he wasn't able to do, but he looked forward to making another title attempt in the future.

A proposal

Recently we received a letter from Werner Keym, who is a teacher (of French and Latin) and is one of the most creative problemists in the world. He is also a profound thinker in all things related to chess, and came up with the following interesting proposal:

Current rules

For Swiss chess tournaments for individuals (not teams), FIDE recommends — in an Annex to the FIDE Tournament Regulations regarding tiebreaks:

  • The result of the direct encounter(s) between the players (if any)
  • The greater number of wins
  • The greater number of games with Black (unplayed games shall be counted as played with White)
  • The Average Rating of Opponents Cut (the average rating of opponents, excluding one or more of the ratings of the opponents, starting from the lowest-rated opponent)
  • Buchholz Cut 1 (the Buchholz score reduced by the lowest score of the opponents)
  • Buchholz (the sum of the scores of each of the opponents of a player)
    Sonneborn-Berger

The Chess World Championship Match should be decided neither by rapid chess nor by blitz chess nor by Armageddon, at the end of the match, but instead by classic chess. For this the World Championship match should be split into of two parts: a prologue and the match itself.

1. Prologue

1.1 This consists of four classic chess games.
1.2 The player with the lower Elo rating plays white in the first game.
1.3 The player who gets more than two points is the prologue winner.
1.4 In case of tie (2:2) the player with the higher Elo rating is the prologue winner.
1.5 We now have a prologue winner and a prologue loser.

2. Match

2.1 This consists of twelve classical chess games.
2.2 The prologue loser plays white in the first game.
2.3 If the prologue loser gets more than six points in the match, he will be the champion.
2.4 If the prologue winner gets at least six points, he will be the champion.

Comments
  • Lots and chance play no role
  • Conditions for the champion and the challenger are equal
    There are at most 16 classic chess games
  • The prologue will take at most four days
  • In the prologue the player with the lower Elo number has nothing to lose and must play aggressive for a win
  • The player with the higher Elo, however, only needs to play for a draw 
  • The championship match is decided in at most 12 games and there may be much excitement towards the end: in case of a drawn score in the 12th game the prologue loser must win, whereas the prologue winner must at least draw
  • The match will end by a fixed day — this is important for organizers, sponsors, media, and audiences
  • The process is similar to gaining the pole position in F1 racing — a favourite is found in advance, and gets an advantage due to his pre-race performance. But it can be taken away during the race itself.

Tell us what you think of the proposal of Werner Keym. Should World Championship matches in the future be held in this way? Please comment in our feedback section below.



Editor-in-Chief emeritus of the ChessBase News page. Studied Philosophy and Linguistics at the University of Hamburg and Oxford, graduating with a thesis on speech act theory and moral language. He started a university career but switched to science journalism, producing documentaries for German TV. In 1986 he co-founded ChessBase.

Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register