Polgar: Playing Carlsen feels like you're drowning

11/29/2014 – The World Chess Championship in Sochi finished a week ago, but news reports of this achievement and result have not died down. Even the Financial Times has devoted space to analysing the result and interviews people like Judit Polgar on Carlsen's strength. Playing him feels like drowning,” she said. "It's frightening is to see him close to 2,900 points”. Judit thinks he can play even better.

ChessBase 15 - Mega package ChessBase 15 - Mega package

Find the right combination! ChessBase 15 program + new Mega Database 2019 with 7.6 million games and more than 70,000 master analyses. Plus ChessBase Magazine (DVD + magazine) and CB Premium membership for 1 year!

More...

His victory was, as Frederic Friedel, co-founder of the Chessbase chess software company, put it, “like a tennis player turning up to Wimbledon with an ancient wooden racket – and winning”. [Carlsen] does not rely on computer analysis nearly as much as his opponents and pays relatively little attention to opening theory. “With the modern computer age, there are some new ideas,” he said a couple of years ago. “But the principles are basically the same... I try not to over-focus on preparation.”

The result of this old-school approach has turned modern chess on its head. Whereas computer analysis has raised the relative importance of the opening for most players, Mr Carlsen has relegated it. He looks instead to win a game later on via the steady and patient accumulation of sometimes almost imperceptible advantages. “The space that chess occupies is so gigantic that in spite of all the computer work done today, you can get out of it,” says Mr Friedel, who occasionally chaperoned Mr Carlsen at tournaments when he was a teenager. “Magnus goes off into sidelines... then he just outplays people. It is extraordinary and amazing.”


For a professional chess player, he is utterly atypical. Most develop an obsession for the game within a couple of years of learning to talk; Carlsen was eight by the time he finally came around to it. Most eschew other activities; Carlsen loves football and skiing. As a boy, he practised ski-jumping. When he plays [chess], often in ripped denims, he fidgets and slouches. A few moves into the eighth game of last week’s match against Mr Anand, he propped his square jaw on his left hand – and appeared to take a nap.

But the most remarkable thing about this largely self-taught player is his unorthodox approach to the game. He sidesteps almost all of the computer wizardry that others consider essential. Paying far less attention to opening theory than his rivals, he is happy to go down paths that may offer no advantage yet have the benefit of dragging opponents out of their “openings book”. Once beyond the reaches of computer-aided openings, Carlsen starts to turn the screw.

Carlsen’s style is positional, relying more on the accumulation of tiny advantages than the attacking pyrotechnics of, say, Kasparov. For his victims, that means slow asphyxiation as he methodically snuffs out their hopes. Just ask Judit Polgar, one of the greatest chess players of all time, who has found herself more than once on the wrong end of Carlsen’s merciless technique. “When I played him, it felt like I was drowning,” she told the FT.

What next? Having arrived at the top, it is tempting to think that the only path runs downhill. But Ms Polgar thinks otherwise. “What is frightening is to see him close to 2,900 points,” she says. “I think he can play much better.”


November 23, 2014

In the end, Magnus Carlsen was simply the better player. Viswanathan Anand, the challenger, certainly made a fight of the World Championship match in Sochi, Russia, but he could not keep up with Carlsen. Anand acknowledged as much in the press conference after he lost Game 11, and the match. “In the end I have to admit he was superior,” Anand said. “His nerves held up better.”

Nerves and the ability to deal with them played a large role at critical points throughout the match. Anand cracked under pressure in Game 2, missed a golden opportunity after Carlsen blundered in Game 6, and then ceded the match with a questionable decision in Game 11. Anand called his 27th move, in which he sacrificed an exchange, “a nervous decision” and added later, “I obviously wasn’t thinking very clearly at this point.” Carlsen agreed in his own press conference, saying “There definitely were nerves, but I think I handled them better than he did.”

Anand was an unlikely challenger this time around as very few people expected him to bounce back after losing the title last year to win the Candidates tournament earlier this year. But he rose to the occasion, not only then, but in the match, playing much better than he did in Chennai. “I kept getting interesting positions to play, which wasn’t happening much in Chennai,” Anand said. Carlsen agreed : “For sure, he played better than he did last time.”

Still the odds of Anand doing it again will only grow longer as he will be 46 years old by the time of the next Candidates tournament in 2016. Viktor Korchnoi managed to become the challenger for the title in 1978, when he was 47, and again in 1981, when he was 50, but that was another era. Today’s players mature faster and there are now many young players, particularly Fabiano Caruana of Italy, currently No. 2 in the world, who is only 22 years old, who would seem to have a better chance.

As for Carlsen, who will be 24 in a few days, he is still very much in his prime. He doubtless will benefit from the experience that he gained in the last two matches. But, for the moment, he can relax and enjoy being champion for the next two years.

Source: Official match web siteDylan McClain wrote the chess column for The New York Times for eight years until the column was discontinued last month.

If you can't get enough of such reports then there are well over 2000 more on broadsheets and news portals to read, currently listen in Google News when you search for "Carlsen Anand Chess World Championship Sochi"



Discussion and Feedback Join the public discussion or submit your feedback to the editors


Discuss

Rules for reader comments

 
 

Not registered yet? Register

Aaronsky72 Aaronsky72 2/18/2016 07:25
@Dysanfel and Niima

Carlsen is ahead of Fischer. Today's chess is far tougher in which to gain an edge. The knowledge is so vast and with computers it has become incredibly hard to forge definitive advantages out of the opening. The fact that Carlsen still manages to outplay opponents and try different openings and dubious lines shows that his natural talent is unmatched.
Aaronsky72 Aaronsky72 2/18/2016 07:22
Really libyantiger? You mean the 3 game winning lead he has over Caruana? You must mean drowning in victory.
Aaronsky72 Aaronsky72 2/2/2015 12:32
" Judit Polgar, one of the greatest chess players of all time"

Wrong.

She at her peak reached number 8 in the world, that hardly qualifies as one of the greatest of all time. She's not in the league of Kasparov, Fischer, Carlsen, Capablanca etc. She has beaten the top players once or twice in individual games but a weaker player can occasionally triumph over a much stronger one.

She is the greatest female chess player of all time by a long way, but Hou Yifan is gaining on her legacy.
cptmajormajor cptmajormajor 12/1/2014 10:47
@ dysanfel
Personally , my definition of the greatest world champion has to include sizeable time with the crown on the head. Since Fischer peaked then retired , he cannot be included. I am sure if Caruana retired after his sinqufield cup win he could claim he would have had strong chance of being a world champ one day without having to actually do it-and there would be many who would agree. Could Fischer have been the greatest ever if he had not retired? Possibly, but considering he suffered from mental illness, possibly not :)
Camembert Camembert 12/1/2014 12:12
@ jhoravi

We regret your previous avatar !
:)
jcaleb jcaleb 12/1/2014 12:35
Why are they downplaying Carlsen's preparation? I think his preparation is underrated
Paredes Paredes 11/30/2014 11:51
@jhoravi, agreed completely, specially sparkling the fact that Carlsen is winning against lads that posses lots of theory and computers to back them up, Fischer opponents didn't count on this support, so this makes Carlsen performance more astonishing too.
Camembert Camembert 11/30/2014 11:34
@ jhoravi
Do you really playchess or are you simply a Top-Model ?
LOL !
Niima Niima 11/30/2014 10:20
@ jhoravi

I assume you are equating Hou Yifan strength to Petrosian's based on ratings. If so, that makes little sense. Comparing players of different eras using nothing but a number is a deficient approach. Petrosian was a world champion who climbed an extremely difficult ladder to reach the top. That represents extraordinary dedication and talent that enable a contender to surpass his peers and reach the summit in a given era. By the same token, you imply that if you take Humpy, Crush and Hou back to the fifties and sixties, they would reach the men's top ten - wrong; that is far from certain and highly unlikely. It just does not compare. Too many variables are involved and it is too simplistic to make such a comparison.
jhoravi jhoravi 11/30/2014 09:25
@ dysanfel
Do you mean Fischers winning streak against Larsen, Taimanov and Petrosian? These opponents are just equivalent to Humpy, Irina Crush and Hou Yifan respectively.
libyantiger libyantiger 11/30/2014 07:10
well when he playing caruana ..carlsen is the one who is drowning
dysanfel dysanfel 11/30/2014 05:15
Lets see Magnus pull off a 24 game tournament winning streak (including ex-world champs) and then another 19 game winning streak against the best of the best, and then we can mention his name in the same breath as Fischer. In 5 world championship matches Kasparov had only 21 wins, 19 losses, and 104 draws in 144 games against Karpov, including once retaining his title on a tie. In my mind Carlsen has already surpassed Karpov and Kasparov in dominance, but is nowhere near what Fischer accomplished.
1